Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
=55.4
: Degrees of freedom = (c 1) (r 1)
= (3 1) (2 1) = 2.
The table value of _
2
for two degrees of freedom at 5 per cent level of significance is 5.991. The calculated
value of _
2
is much higher than this table value which means that the calculated value cannot be said to have arisen
just because of chance. It is significant. Hence, the hypothesis does not hold good. This means that the sampling
techniques adopted by two investigators differ and are not similar. Naturally, then the technique of one must be
superior than that of the other.
Q4. What do you mean by cost of living index? Discuss the methods of construction of
cost of living index with an example for each.
The cost-of-living index, or general index, shows the difference in living costs between cities. The cost of living
in the base city is always expressed as 100. The cost of living in the destination is then indexed against this number.
So to take a simple example, if London is the base (100) and New York is the destination, and the New York index is
120, then New York is 20% more expensive than London. Similarly, if London is the base and Budapest is the
destination, and the Budapest index is 80, than the cost of living in Budapest is 80% of London's.
The cost-of-living index expresses the difference in the cost of living between any two cities in the survey. How
is this index calculated?
Using exactly the same price data, but different methods of calculation, a number of different people could come
up with a number of markedly different indices. The challenge, therefore, when seeking to construct an index is to
know which method is best for the problem at hand and to represent equitably (in one figure) the general trend of
price differences in separate locations. To illustrate this point, let us take a simple price survey comparing two
fictional cities, "Westwood" and "Leville."
Westwood Leville
Bread (1kg) 1.00 1.25
Potatoes (1kg) 3.00 2.00
Coffee (1kg) 2.50 1.75
Sugar (1kg) 1.00 1.75
TOTAL 7.50 6.75
Assuming we give equal weight to each of the products, which of the two towns deserves the higher cost of
living index number? The answer is: it all depends on how the calculation is made.
1) Westwood is more expensive if we simply add up the prices of the four items in the index and compare the
two cities on that basis.
2) Leville, however, is more expensive when we use Westwood as a base city and calculate an index based on
the average of relative prices in the two cities:
Westwood Leville
Bread 100 125
Potatoes 100 67
Coffee 100 70
Sugar 100 175
Index 100 109
However, if the same calculation is done with Leville serving as a base city, Westwood becomes the more
expensive city:
Leville Westwood
Bread 100 80
Potatoes 100 150
Coffee 100 143
Sugar 100 57
Index 100 107.50
Thus with the standard price-relatives calculation we can end up in the paradoxical situation where each city is
more expensive than the other.
3) Using a different method, both Leville and Westwood would have the same index number, ie 100, and neither
would be considered more expensive than the other. Such a calculation would be made according to a well-
established statistical formula that takes prices in both cities, makes an average of them, and uses this average as the
basis for the index comparison. This formula, adopted by the Economist Intelligence Unit for its indices, has some
distinct advantages over the standard price-relatives calculation described in Step 2 above.
With the EIU formula, for example, the paradoxical situation of the two cities being more expensive than each
other cannot arise: if city A = 100 and city B = 110, then this relationship is maintained, even if city B is used as a
base (when B = 100 then A = 91). In other words, the EIU indices are reversible. This property ensures that the cost
of living allowances established with the aid of the indices are consistent in that executives transferred from city A to
B can be dealt with on the same footing as those transferred from city B to A. In addition, the indices are nearly
circular. This means that the relationship between any three cities is maintained regardless of which of the cities is
used as a base with which to compare the other two. This logical inter-relationship is important in assuring equitable
cost of living compensation as executives are transferred from location to location.
The index formula. The index is based on the arithmetic mean of price levels in the two selected cities. In order
to calculate the index for the two hypothetical cities examined on the previous page, we must first calculate the
average price of each item:
Westwood Leville Average price
Bread 1.00 1.25 1.125
Potatoes 3.00 2.00 2.500
Coffee 2.50 1.75 2.125
Sugar 1.00 1.75 1.375
Next we compare prices in each town to these average prices:
Average Westwood Leville
Bread 100 89 111
Potatoes 100 120 80
Coffee 100 118 82
Sugar 100 73 127
General Index 100 100 100
As we can see the relationship between Westwood and Leville prices remains intact: bread is still 25% more
expensive in Leville, potatoes are still 50% more expensive in Westwood. If we want to compare Westwood as a
base city to Leville, we must divide Leville's index by that of Westwood and multiply by 100. The result is 100. If
we reverse the operation and use Leville as base, the result is also 100. The two cities are equally expensive.
There is another element to the discussion. In the example above, we have assumed that each item is as
important as the other. But that's clearly not true of every product in the survey: the price of a car is more important
in determining the index than the cost of a loaf of bread, for example. Every EIU Cost of Living index therefore
applies an identical set of weights for each product in the survey.
The weights have been selected on the basis of research that indicates that while there are certainly differences
among the various national spending patterns, there are also some average figures that can probably be accepted by
most companies.
The figures below indicate the sum of individual weights attributed to all the items which compose each of the
index categories. They are as follows:
%
Shopping basket 25.0
Alcoholic beverages 3.5
Household supplies 4.5
Personal care 4.0
Tobacco 2.5
Utilities 6.5
Clothing 13.0
Domestic help 3.5
Recreation & entertainment 18.0
Transportation 19.5
TOTAL 100.0
Of course, the average weightings shown above should not be taken to indicate that the average expatriate
spends 25% of his total income on food. What is meant is that of the amount spent on products included in sections
one to ten of the present survey, about 25% on average goes into the types of products included in section one
(shopping basket).
Q5.Define trend. Enumerate the methods of determining trend in time series.
Trend estimation is a statistical technique to aid interpretation of data. When a series of measurements of a
process are treated as a time series, trend estimation can be used to make and justify statements about tendencies in
the data, by relating the measurements to the times at which they occurred. By using trend estimation it is possible to
construct a model which is independent of anything known about the nature of the process of an incompletely
understood system (for example, physical, economic, or other system). This model can then be used to describe the
behaviour of the observed data.
3 methods for measuring the trends in a times series graph:
1. Free Hand Method:
In this method all of the data is plotted on a graph. A smooth curve is then drawn through the midpoints of each
fluctuation. The advantage of this method is that it is simple, flexible and does not need any complex mathematical
formula. However its main disadvantage is that it is based on subjective judgements and its lack of mathematical
accuracy can lead to bias of the results.
2. Moving Means Method
This method smooths out seasonal variations in a graph by taking data averages over each cycle. When
calculating moving means, take the same number of intervals as the length of the seasonal patterns. The advantage of
this method is that it is easy and simple to compute. The disadvantage is that if the proper period of the moving
means is not used then the results can be misleading.
3. Least Square Method
Mathematically this is the most accurate method of finding a trend line. This approach can be used to fit a
straight line, parabolic trend or exponential trend. In this book we will only deal with the straight line trend. The
calculations used in this method can be quite time consuming, however a number of graphic calculators and/or Excel
can easily compute the equations of a straight line, parabolic or exponential trend. The method involves taking the
sum of the deviations from the actual values and forming a mathematical equation which can be used for forecasting.
The disadvantage is that the computations can be complex and if data is added later then all computations have to be
repeated.
Answer
Null Hypothesis
(a) The machines are homogenous
i.e.,
A =
B=
C =
D
(b) The workers are homogeneous
i.e.,
1 =
2 =
3=
4 =
5
Alternative Hypothesis
(a) At least two of the machines differ significantly
(b) At least two of the workers differ significantly
In the usual notation, we have:
K = 5, H = 4, N = KH = 5 4 = 20
G = Xij = 20;
Calculation of various s.s
Raw S.S (RSS) = Xij
2
= [(16+4+49+16)+(36+0+144+9) + (36+16+16+64) + (9+4+36+49)
+ (4+4+81+1)]
= 594
Total S.S = RSS - CF = 594 - 20 = 574
Workers Machine Type Total
A B C D
I 4 -2 7 -4 R
1 =
5
II 6 0 12 3 R
2 =
21
III -6 -4 4 -8 R
3 =
-14
IV 3 -2 6 -7 R
4 =
0
V -2 2 9 -1 R
5 =
8
Total C
1 =
5
C
2 =
-
6
C
3 =
38
C
4 =
-17
G = 20
S.S Rows (Workers) =
=161.5
S.S Columns (Machine Type) =
=338.8
SSE = Error S.S = TSS SSR SSC
= 574 161.5 338.8
= 73.7
Since the various sum of the squares are not affected by change of origin, the ANOVA
table for the original data and the given data obtained on changing the origin to 20 will
be same and in given in following table.
Degrees of Freedom for various S.S
d.f for TSS = n -1 = 20 -1 = 19
d.f for Rows (Workers) = 5 -1 = 4
d.f for Column (Machines ) = 4 -1 = 3
d.f for SSE = 19 - (4 + 3) = 12
OR d.f for SSE = (d.f for Rows) (d.f for columns)
= (3 4) = 12
: SSE = Error S.S = TSS SSR SSC
= 574 161.5 338.8
= 73.7
Since the various sum of the squares are not affected by change of origin, the ANOVA
table for the original data and the given data obtained on changing the origin to 20 will
be same and in given in following table.
Degrees of Freedom for various S.S
d.f for TSS = n -1 = 20 -1 = 19
d.f for Rows (Workers) = 5 -1 = 4
d.f for Column (Machines ) = 4 -1 = 3
d.f for SSE = 19 - (4 + 3) = 12
OR d.f for SSE = (d.f for Rows) (d.f for columns)
= (3 4) = 12