The American Theater of the Sinthome

; aLacanian journey through the roar of Edward Albee and the desert dust of Sam Shepard The American Phantasm voiced

[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome

Voices becoming other voices. Voices from the dead and living. Hypnotized voices. Sober voices. Working voices. Voices in anguish. Sam Shephard fromTongues.

The object a, Voice Right out of the gateLacanian psychoanalysis is performative.In this paper I will concentrate on the resonance that occurs whenan aesthetic production yields to an untranslatable aspect of voicethe voice as partial object.As Lacannotes, the voice can move as a partial object through the partial drive, evocatory drive. Just as the object little a is hidden in the visual field,

so the conception of the function of language as communication hides the object of the voice. (Stafford,Ex Nihilo). How does the voice travel so that something might also be heard? How does the object a in the visual field Rather its

catch the ear, not the eye, even though it is never fully heard. enigma is heard?

I believe when we speak of psychoanalysis, we speak of the words through which the untranslatable object a moves forth, but we often speak to the object a of the imaginary as if it is only a sighted image, yet this sighting is moving andsensed through oral and written aspects of transmission. The gaze and the

voice are not so discreet and a very crude read of Lacan is that the image is imaginary and that language is symbolic. But if words do indeed appear to dissolve in such a way that only images are seen, this temptation to get lost in the imaginary simply emphasizes that the words that are actually conveying the imaginary are dismissed. The words in analysticsessions (the talking

cure)are conveying the image. There is much to say about the difference between writing and oration that is beyond the scope of this paper, but it is
[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome 2

not incidental that the fiction writer, poet, andplaywright concern themselves with this thing calledvoice. Sometimes you come close to the thing,

sometimes it has you in its grip or you have it in your grip, sometimes you chase it down, sometimes it chases you down. Sometimes you lose it. It loses you. Sometime you get lost in it. But when you can catch that place where it The subject speaks.

belongs to you and other.

I would like to follow a line of thinking where the partial object in language that passes between a speaker to a listener operating in poetics,

theater, fiction, where free association is primary, is also operating in similar fashion in the setting of psychoanalysis, particularly type that works patterns of sound and associations, writing of the where imaginal

associations might be less tightly bound to being inhibited by any one signifier, rather there is a way of working that offers a greater possibility

of para praxis, slips and slippages, where these interruptions in any tightly wound narrativeenables the voice(s) of a story to find its way. say a piece of the subject finds its way. So it appears to sound not as a voice of piece(s) are heard. We might

Memory, reverie, thought, affect.

taken on, but rather the voice(s)

Voice(s) because the voice is operating betweenthe

body and the other of language. Between conscious and unconscious, between signification and signified.Voice operates in such a way that any central speaker dissolves, the identification to the central speaker disappears. Yes...this is why we go to analysis to discover. Who is this voice? We want to know

Lacan indicates we want to know and we dont want to know.

and dont want to know about our symptom that remains mute, that is also speaking in riddles. We want to hear all about it, and we dont want to hear it at all. The real is foreclosed. The drive cannot be accessed.The subject

resides in words.Lacan says it is in words that you will find the subject
[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome 3

(Lacan, 1975). The symptom embodied in the real offers itself into the symbolic when it speaks. The voice is the conduit, the real location

through which an opening operates and through which openings can occur. This object a of the voice operates such that the analysand who attempts to present a picture of himself to the analyst...suddenly finds that this picture dissolvingthrough the words voiced in the context of the analytic setting. The words tell another picture/story..photo/fiction beginning their operation of sliding in and around and outside the image conveyed through words. But as we deal with language that is notseparated from the signified, we are never fully operating outside of imaginary identifications to self and other as we speak. Yet, the signifier offers a slip into other

signifieds..other signifiersthese associations that comprise the chain of signifiersinclude the signified as well. If a signified is slipping out

from a metaphoric bind to the signifier, another signified.. a pictorial association is on the horizon. The signified in its detachment gives way to

hinge onto another signified. In other words images set off by a signifier may produce the next signifier. But signifiers are always operating in relation to imagery.The capacity of the associative quality of links produced out of a metonomy has to do with the signifieds that move in the same way that the dream images work to bring forth the sound of language that offer the

routes breaking through the more tightly wound fabric and weaves of language that move through conscious processes. We are not simply textual machines,

but rather letters are related to perception, and the unconscious of the dream world that subjects inhabit. And the voice of a subject who speaks with breath, pauses, laughter, sighs, sobbing and at times, like with Dora, coughing.

[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome

An analystsidentifications to the patient begins towork in consort with the analysands representations so there is a moving in and out of these snap shots in a variety ofplacements.As Lacan draws in his Schema L (Lacan, 1955). The analysts snapshots and the analysands snapshots are crossing

on an imaginary axis. The analyst in tracking the nuances, plays of language, phrases, words, utterances within framework ofanalytic knowledge is attempting to follow the unconscious through the axis that cuts across the imaginary axis.The analyst is tracking words, staying close to the analysands words that may be directing the analyst towards an object a embedded, camouflaged in the visual fieldthrough an a that resides in an enigma of the word, the signifier hidden in the field of speech. The analyst is

attempting to follow a symbolic axis, byhearing the words, the sound of words, that may speak beyond the snap of the picture that the analysand wishes the analyst to seethat may sneak out of the meaning the analysand wishes to make and the meaning the analyst wishes to make through conscious ego processes. In the analytic setting there are two divided subjects, two personal unconsciouses, and with language the concealing and revealing aspects of the unconscious through words at play. The analyst, bydialing down the noise of countertransference that is vulnerable to the pull of the analysand who wishes to place the analyst in a variety of positionsthrougha snap shot, is guided by the analysands words. By serving as a transferential analyst has a possibility of discovering where object, the he/she is

objectified/represented through the lens of the imaginary. The transference position enables what is enacted in the setting to serve as another

cluethrough which the analyst can make sense of what transpires beyond what the analysand is showing in words. It is a clue of what the analysand wishes

to enact in these photo/ fantasies of which the analyst is implicatedof

[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome 5

which the analysand is loath to speak.

If the analyst does not gratify the

analysand through a reenactment(a belief that the scene is real or authentic), butenables him/herself to be implicated in a mise- en- scene through transference operating, the ongoing curiosity about these placements

enable a further speaking about what lies outside the snap shot, but once another snap shot is spoken another mise-en-scene arises the real is foreclosed but just outside the edges of what is shown in words. What is shown in words, have little to do with the letter. When Lacan says that actors make good analysts the liquidity of ego serves the analyst in ways that enable the analyst to move forth through the role in his/her person in a way that honors and respects actual experiential exchanges produced by the mise- en- scene. As well as to further the

direction of the Lacanian cure through being able to also live outside the mise- en-scene in the analytic room using the artificial setting of the

analytic room to enable a subjects words to fall on the side of the hidden object a conveyed through its voice(s). The analyst to do this is

framing through an analytic knowledge resting in the symbolic, but is also resonating to this attempt (impossible to capture the object a.).that is moving beyond reach to a tune. It is the moving target..that drives the

repetition compulsion..the sufferingthe symptom of the analysand. This object a of The voice is again emphasized when Lacan mentions in his homage to Duras, It is there where the writer goesthat the psychoanalysts should be (Lacan,1975).Lacan is indicating that the writer moves to the other jouissance, the feminine jouissance that he begins to articulate in hisencounter of James Joyces voice.

[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome

Voices to voices. Scenes of memory and fantasy

rising and falling. Where

the voice of the analyst melts into the brother, where the voice of the analysand speaks to this brother. Where the voice of the analysand becomes her father speaking to the analyst who is moved to the position of lover. Put another way the actor that can act is not being an actor. Being an

actor, interferes with performance in the same way that being an analyst interferes with analysis. In this sense psychoanalysis is not merely

knowledge, or a profession, it is very much a craft. That is passed through analysis, transmission, voicessupervising, attuning the listening of those committed to learning the craft; Learning to listen to the sense of the object a through voice. Lacan in his notion of the paranoic ego working to maneuver knowledge through the mirror stage in a defense against the unknown sees at some level the communication of knowledge, the teaching of knowledge through the academic discourse as inhibiting speech at the site of the production of desire. Because many times the speech utilized in academic discourse remains in the service to produce replication and redundancy of prior knowledge by operating in the service of thought, mentation, cogito, intellectualizations that eclipse the partial object of voicethrough demand or command to resound to The object a of the voice, like the

bodiesof thought..epic bodies of thought.

object a through the visual field rests in the realthe body. Not of bodies of thought. rims of the body. But in the erogenous zoneson the edge of the lips, the The symptom is carved through speech, the letter that is

first place between transgression and prohibition where the subject .resides. ..this letter may speak or not. May reach its destination or not. But if it doesthe subject speaks at the intersection of transgression and

prohibiton..at the corner of abjection and acceptability.

[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome 7

For the academic discourse this necessitates a certain severing of the voice that is in fact compelled in the analytic setting where an entirely different form of speaking and listening to words are moved through the practice of free association. We could say this practice is much more kindred to the

stream of consciousness of Joyce, Beckett, and their influences on the American playwrights such as Albee and Shephard moving through the specific history and themes of American theater .

Voices becoming other voices. Voices from the dead and living. Hypnotized voices. Sober voices. Working voices. Voices in anguish. Those working on Shepards production Sam Shepard.

Tongues, purposively changed locations

as they were writing. Shepard describes writing scenes in different settings; a restaurant, a beach , a park, hotel rooms, we sat in a truck and then towards the end of writing the piece we would meet up at the location of the Magic Theater San Francisco and perform the piece. Shepard remembers;

Sometimes we would just talk without trying to push the content into the structure of the piece. Other times the talk would be translated verbatim and we would write things down on the spot dialogue, trance poem or whatever. and then turn it into monologue or

These improvisational, spontaneous ways

of finding voice offers a less intellectualized approach to expression that is more in keeping with making sense of free associations. Derived through specific locations. Derived through subjects in specific locations. In the place and time of the personal unconscious.

[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome

Style The writing productions that were also influencing Lacan through a stylethat was meandering ruminatingobscure poeticrunning up against the grain of the more reasoned academic American style of writing about analysis. The Americans were emphasizing the tamable aspect of the threat of a wild unconscious through an adaptive ego writing style that that was clear, crisp andreasoned. The Americans would emphasize shoring up,Lacan on the other saw the danger that was being created by attempting to damn up the unconscious through a psychoanalysis that was moving towards a winning approach; the successful analysis based on a capacity to function and adapt to society. Lacan in returning to Freud fought the tendency to normalize the subject in the image of the analysts ego concerned that analysis would be hygienized rather than separated from the conventions that through the psychoanalytic discourses that could be deconstructed. What the analysand does with what he hears of his own unconsciouswould lie in the hands of the subject. By studying the way the voice works in the theater as opposed to academic discourse, we may in fact be much closer in line to the voice operating as partial object in an analysis. It is this type of voicing that is operating

in the analysis that then crosses back over into the psychoanalytic discourse to become the transmission of psychoanalytic discourse. The subject speaks.

When this aspect of voicing is not reached within the analytic setting or is lost on the way to explication in a theory of psychoanalytic discourse that turns into academic discourse then the voice as partial object disappears and the transmission of psychoanalysis fails. This is important consideration in

any question of how psychoanalytic transmission occurs. The voice speaks the specificity of the objectthrough a name, an inheritance, a location, a
[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome 9

symptom. It is spoken through the voices of voiceof a subject operating in the time of a personal unconscious. Operating on knowledges; overt, covert, subliminal, transhistorical, unconscious, consciousof the Other.Operating

through a symptom speaking that exist in between the real and symbolic suspended in the imaginary if there is to be an honest performance of Freudian psychoanalysis where the analytic voicecan find its release and can take its flight home to the personal unconscious.Intimations, particularities, its tricky arrangements rearrangements through the way, the route, a pass, that this voice might travel enabling another radical return to the Freudian unconscious. The component of the voice explored through method acting , particularly during the Strasbergs actingmethod based on the Stanislavskis work

depicted a certain reality which was catering less to the audience and more to an actuality that would work through a theater set (here actors backs, for example, might be turned away from the audience). The audience was no longer

being entertained, accommodated. Strasbergsmethod - acting required actors to switch scenes, switch characters, to increase the flexibility with the whole entire script for the purpose of understanding where each actor was located as one of an entire ensemble , a voice, fragmenting into many voices through characters. The American theater, no doubt bolstered by the influence of stream of consciousness and nonplot plays offered the space to

experiment with and express the transient and fragmented nature of an American identity that was being produced to resist forces that championed the postworld war assembly line of a mass production. The theater was tracing the disillusionment ofthe complexity of the post -war

transienceand

Americanpathos.The American theater was generating, through a style of acting and writing a way to voice theobject athe death drive. Speaking through
[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome 10

subjects.

Subjects

existing

in

the

time

of

the

personal

unconsciousinfluenced by intimate knowledges of family, location, time. The theater influenced by Beckett and others, as well as Freud in operation through the avantgarde as opposed to academia, and the American

psychoanalytic organizations shutting out the lay analysts openedto the Freudian death drive and ushered it into the American public. Institutionalized Freudlost its voice. The voice of id. It is important to note that this was also time of exodus from Europe of psychoanalytic immigrants attempting to gain a foothold through the medical establishment. Interestingly, their discourses established American ego The American

psychology which in many ways indicated that these immigrants harbored anidealism about the ego that was no doubt impacted by their own relationship to a lived nightmare that may have spawned a strong Darwinian message. The strong survive, the weak parish. The immigrants capacity to survive World

War II became something of special credence perhaps regarding these survivors of the holocaust. The individuals capacity to survive mass destruction was based on an individual will against all odds perhaps meshing well with the American success of winning the war. This survival orientation along with the lure of authorizing psychoanalysis through medical establishments in America anchored the voice of a psychoanalysis that was on the side of the adaptive ego defenses rather than on the side of maintaining the Freudian unconscious. Yet, the medical establishment was not the only route where

psychoanalysis traveled. However, when psychoanalysis began to become a profession, the American professional associations distanced themselves from the lay analyst movement that wasprominent in Europe. While Freud abstracted from the clinic through academic routes, the voice that would continue to

[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome

11

carry Freuds unabridged death drivewas the voice of American Dramatic Theater. Theater productions were much more influenced by Paris than the medical establishment through which Freuds death drive would be obliterated. Lacan

in returning to Freud moves against the edification of Freud to fit the bourgeoisieAmerican post- war attitude. In Lacans later work as he begins

to place more emphasis on the real, Lacan returns to the erogenous impasses Freud maps on the real of the body to further his commitment to the Freudian unconscious and to place the symptom as a lens through which any body of knowledge is generated so that the partial drives, would not be lost in revisions of psychoanalysis through the clinical practice or the academic explorations. We could say thatin both instances, the clinic and in academia, the voice as partial object became faintdifficult to hear. Lacans voice as a psychoanalyst, however, was loudly resonant. Meandering,

associative, jokes, puns, playing around all the while transmitting the analytic discourse that was directed towards death drive. His performance

spoke the return to theunconscious in a speaking that often occurs in the analytic setting. The transferences to Lacan were in large part to a voice that could resonate to the tune of the object a performatively speaking. Here we note that for some this would be an irresistible seductionthat would prompt speaking, talking, and acting and dressing in imitation Lacans style. Memorizing text or seminars line by line. A certain mirroring transference

occurred wherein this taking on of the personae of the person of the analyst in some way offers this possibility of finding the voice imagined by the neurotic as ultimate jouissance afforded to Lacan as the originator the lead actor in his radical return to Freud. The Primal father. Or in some more perverse sense a fetish through which the pervert becomes bound in an
[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome 12

instrumental way to fetishize, to slip into the skin of Lacan.

To in a sense

complete Lacan, parasitically.But this is exactly why Lacan indicates that the

actor makes a good analyst in that psychoanalysis cannot work through

symptomatic placements of Lacan on the side of inhibition of the neurotic or disinhibition of the pervert. relations to law is offered Rather the subject regardless of symptomatic a time to find their own voice between

transgresson and prohibition.Sinthomatic voice. We can acknowledge that Lacan found his very Frenchvoicing of Freud, but psychoanalysis is not owned by any geography. As the unconscious is not specific to a cultural location. It rises and falls in accordance to where it is permitted to speak and whereit is heard. This could as easily be Harlem as Paris. And might be.In this sense Psychoanalysis rises and falls on the singular voice in the time of the personal unconscious. It is an intimate enterprise. That is transmitted in letters. Letters that are often received as intimate, not necessarily

disclosing, but intimate. The letter lies in between transgression and prohibition. These letters that are spoken and are as hidden as they are revealing. These letters of psychoanalysis. The Sinthome as Stylized Voice Lacan describes the kernel of the symptom as that which holds a residue of the Real. Joyce. His work in Le Sinthome (1975) was influenced by the writings of James Lacan traced the structure of the symptom through the complex written about psychoanalysis

They can bar, as well as raise the bar.

linguistic productions that manifests through a stream of conscious writing that was not so held back or oppressed by the cohesive meaning that comprises a social conversation..or we might even say a rational dialectic. This does not mean that the rational or secondary processes are devalued. Not at all. But as both repression and revelation happen in language,
13

the

[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome

deconstruction

of

the

intellectual

paranoic

egoic

defenses

comprising

languaginggive way to voice. The snap shot of intellectual ideas, give way to the voice (s) that stray out of the shot. But are within ear shot. places the inhibition of the symptom Lacan

between the imaginary and symbolic. We

might say that in Seminar XX, Lacan begins to look at the relationship to the symbolic in terms of phallic and feminine jouissance wherein the symptom is either constrained by a fear of castration related to transgression of the law, or the symptom may be less bound to the phallic jouissance and more resonate with a feminine jouissance which emphasis the imaginary that has a certain access to the foreclosed real through a less encumbered relationship to the law of the father. Lacans encounter, Bakero (2012) will say transference?to Joyces text. Lacanhears asuppleance in Joyces text location

that expressed the relationship between the subject and a phantasmic .. set between the Imaginary and Real.

That we might say could plug up the

real (in words) to ward off a full immersion into psychosis. This suppleance enabled Joyce to function by utilizing signification to work through an underlying psychotic structure by engaging a symbolic. The symbolic was not a father, but rather words we could

so taken over by a neurotic accommodating

say were more on the side of the realand in this way would transgress, the law of the father. Here Lacan could challenge the languaging pressured by a But we have to It

superegoic force that would threatened to cooptpsychoanalysis.

ask what does this say about the audience that got Joycereally got Joyce. actually says quite a bit.

The audience that appreciated Joyce was not

comprised of only psychotics. There was a resonance with perhaps another jouissance, the Other jouissance that was not phallic and not necessarily psychotic. The other jouissance could dismantle the symbolic structures that truth.Lacan began to

begin to get stagnant and confused with the

understand that the symbolic often fossilized into phallic meaning such that a
[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome 14

regression to a gaze stifled the subjects speech and catered to a knowledge that believed it was the real . This worked against and inhibited the

kernel of the Real within the symptom where the layer of the gaze would have to be deconstructed through a retroactive movement against the conclusive meanings breaking out the enigma of the signifiers so that the mirage of the gaze, the veneer that covered the unconscious in a bounded way that protected castration anxiety could give way to an encounter of what was not so bound by the law of the fathernot so bound in inhibition..a fear of the transgression of which the letter was lodged. It was this piece of clinical analytic articulate

workthat Lacan began to move through his reading of James Joyce to

how the symptom might develop into a sinthome where a subjects voice could be heard. Where the symptom is no longer weighted by a phallic jouissance where

the foreclosed real will inevitable returning in the trauma through the repetition compulsionrather than falling as a voice into making a sense, a jouissense , that is not perhaps so intellectual, but enables a speaking on the side of the voice. Carving what is uncarvedof the symptom in a way that

enables the tick or the affliction to now work on the side of the life of the subject so thatthe subject speaks. References: Bakero, Martin 2012, Presentation Apres Coup, NYC Lacan, Jacques (1975) Le Sinthome, Cormack Gallagher (trans) Ireland

Lacan, Jacques (1985) Homage to Duras, Onicar Journal, Paris Lacan, Jacques (1975)_Geneva Lecture on the Symptom, Russell Griggs (Trans) Shepard, Sam (1984) Seven Plays, Random House, Inc. NYC (have yet to track down date ) Ex Nihilo, Apres Coup

Stafford, Mark Archives.

[Type the company name] | The American Theater of the Sinthome

15