Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
tive study of otitis media with effusion in the first two years of
life. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33: 188-194.
Gravel, J.S., Wallace, I.F. & Ruben, R.J. (1996) Auditory conse-
quences of early mild hearing loss associated with otitis media.
Acta Otolarygol (Stockh) 116: 219-221.
Haggard, H. & Hughes, E. (1991) Screening Childrens Hearing:
A review of the literature and the implications of otitis media.
Medical Research Council - London HMSO.
Hall, J.W., Grose, J.H. & Pillsbury, H.C. (1995) Long-term effects
of chronic otitis media on binaural hearing in children. Archives
of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 121: 847-852.
Lous, J. (1995) Otitis media and reading achievement: A review.
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 32: 105-121.
Simms, Sue (1994) Mother and child - building the bonds
beyond speech. Human Communication 4 (1): 22 -24.
Schilder, A.G.M., Snik, A.F.M., Straatman, H. & van den Broek, P. (1994)
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 2002 28
how I
or most deaf children, the development of their com-
munication skills requires long-term commitment from
themselves, their parents and therapists. For deaf chil-
dren, communication covers sign, lip-reading, talking,
use of gesture and the ability to read contextual clues. All of us
who have been to signing classes know just how difficult this is
- especially signing and speaking simultaneously.
For deaf children born to deaf parents, British Sign Language (BSL) is
the first language of the home. BSL has its own grammatical structure,
lip patterns and facial expressions, and therefore does not follow spoken
English word order. After many years of hard work following the 5-14
curriculum (the Scottish equivalent of the National Curriculum for
England and Wales) taught in sign supported English, many of these sec-
ond-generation deaf people become skilled lip-readers, perhaps because
they had a well established first language at an early age. But for many
deaf children, lip-reading does not come naturally. Slow language acqui-
sition, difficulties in understanding, limited vocabulary development, and
so many words that look alike on the lips, all make lip-reading difficult.
Deaf people - mainly children, but also deafened adults - make
up my entire caseload, and I have a cross-Tayside advisory role. I
see children from birth through to the end of secondary school if
necessary, including those in units and others who are supported
in mainstream school. Like most speech and language therapists,
I am all too familiar with the task of keeping teenagers motivated
in therapy. Many have lost interest and some are too embar-
rassed to practise their communication skills. For a long time I
looked for a reward for these hard working deaf teenagers - a
certificate that would show colleges of further education, and
future employers, that these students had reached a recognised
standard and proficiency in lip-reading, and that it was not just
naturally acquired. I also wanted to highlight the deaf students
who were lip-reading in a second language.
The Scottish Qualifications Award in Lip-Reading is a free
standing module with no formal entry requirements which
enables the hearing impaired student and / or the deafened stu-
dent to develop lip-reading skills. There are four learning out-
comes and, by the end of the module, students should.
1. know the factors which affect lip-reading and be able to
apply coping strategies.
2. be able to lip-read short sentences presented at a slow
conversational rate and within a known context.
3. participate in and respond to a series of related short
sentences presented at a slow conversational rate and in a
known context by a variety of speakers.
4. participate in a group discussion.
Learning outcome one teaches the students about difficult lip-
reading situations. This can cover everything from trying to lip-
read someone who talks with their hand over their mouth, to
someone who over-exaggerates and talks too slowly. This also cov-
ers badly lit rooms and people sitting with their back to the light.
Deaf children, like most children with special needs, very seldom
have to think about how other people communicate with them.
We have all been trained to sit still, to speak carefully, and to ensure
good lighting and quiet rooms. As a result, these students have
never had to think what to do about other peoples poor commu-
nication styles - they have always been busy perfecting their own.
It is difficult for any of us to ask for clarification or repetition, but it
is particularly difficult for deaf teenagers lacking in confidence. As
one teenager said to me, But youre a teacher - we cant say.
Then we wonder why so many deaf adults nod and smile politely...
Learning outcome two teaches the student to keep their mind
focused on a theme. For the examination, they have to lip-read
and give the gist of ten short sentences full of information.
Learning outcome three tests the students ability in holding a
one to one conversation on a known familiar topic. Learning
outcome four tests the ability to participate in a group discus-
sion. This is particularly difficult for people with a hearing loss;
trying to locate who is talking and also to contribute to a dis-
cussion without interrupting.
Functional knowledge
I felt that all of these outcomes were areas that I would be cov-
ering in therapy, and that the students could achieve this module
through planned cooperative working between the teachers and
myself. The teachers of the deaf within the secondary unit were
not only interested but totally supportive and involved, as were
the mainstream teachers. I had not initially realised the extent
of involvement that would be required from the other profes-
sionals within the school, but this became clear as the module
progressed. This was not just about passing an exam, but about
being able to lip-read different people in different settings with-
in the school, therefore demonstrating functional knowledge.
Throughout the school year I led a team of teachers making up
worksheets and checklists, giving in-service training and devising
record sheets to record the pupils progress. There was only one
significant problem. The Scottish Qualification Agencys (SQA) rules
would not permit me to assess the module because I was not a reg-
istered secondary teacher. To overcome this, the Trusts Training and
Development Centre made the decision to put me through the SQA
Assessors Award, thus enabling me to deliver and assess the mod-
ule. This involved an incredible amount of work. Throughout the
year I attended tutorials at the Training and Development Centre,
the head teacher of the unit assessed me assessing the pupils, and
a verifier came from SQA and assessed all of us.
Meanwhile, the school pupils were entered for their exam, which
I found daunting as I had now taken on a teachers role, and I
found myself willing these children to pass. Success was important
as the module would appear on their leaving certificate. I had to
find people to test learning outcomes three and four. This turned
into real interagency working as I brought in social workers for the
deaf, lip-speakers (who convey a speakers message to lip-readers
accurately), teachers and other speech and language therapists.
For learning outcome one, I enlisted the help of another speech
and language therapist and a deafened adult who was a retired
actor. Between us we made a video of a role-play of an interview
situation with the interviewer being un-deaf aware. This was
fun, but difficult to make because we all found it so hard to be so
un-deaf aware and to have such poor communication skills.
The morning of the exam dawned. I was relaxed until I arrived
at school to find a line of chairs outside the medical room for the
candidates. Inside, the room was all set up examination style, with
a video camera ready to run. The day went well and the candi-
dates were relaxed and confident - even though the participating
adults were nervous and anxious about their communication
skills! We put everything on video because this was the first time
this module had been used for many years in Scotland.
The students passed the module and I passed my assessors
award. At that time speech and language therapy was part of
the Primary Care Trust, and the Chairman and Chief Executive
presented the certificates at a special ceremony. The module
appears on the pupils leaving certificates as part of a group of
modules including deaf studies and an introduction to signing.
Since then, several other speech and language therapists in
Scotland have run this module and I run and assess it in school. It has
given us all a sense of achievement and the students well deserved
recognition. But it also makes the ultimate outcome measure.
Resources:
For further information on the module discussed in this article, see
www.sqa.org.uk then click on QUALIFICATIONS DATABASE, then click on
National Unit by title, then insert lip-reading into the search box. This
will take you to the National Certificate Module Descriptor for E7M3
(Intermediate) Lip-Reading Skills (SEN Hearing Impaired).
The
utmate
outcome
measure
lor many dea
chdren, p-readng
does not come
naturay. Susan
Howden ound out
how derent
agences coud
work together to
ensure that the
eort needed by
dea teenagers to
master ths sk
coud be
recognsed and
rewarded.
l