Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Auto-regulating Strategies
That gives us a checklist of things we need going in to written workout: the rep range, a goal RPE, and a time limit. Heres some different ways to put it together into workable strategies.
Percentages
Earlier I was complaining about percentages, but I dont think theyre totally worthless as long as you can regularly update them, say every month or so. I wouldnt really suggest testing a new 1RM every month, but you should have some way of being in the ballpark of where you are. The big problem to get around with percentages is their inaccuracy. You might think youre at 75% when youre really at 70% or 80%. Or maybe you really are at 75%, but youre so beat up that it ends up being too much on the day. Percentages arent flexible.
Block Periodization
Block periodization fits well with autoregulation, because all it does is give you some guidelines for your workout variables according to each block. Theres three kinds of blocks that youll come across. Verkhoshansky calls them A-B-C. Issurin calls them Accumulation, Transmutation, and Realization. They both do the same thing. A or Accumulation Lots of volume in the form of sub-maximal sets in the 2-5 range; this would translate to RPEs of 7-8. Fast, smooth lifting. Youd want to train things
All this talk about autoregulation and about getting strong in more general ways has had me doing a lot of thinking. This workout scheme in particular was inspired by this post of mine and the paper it references. Autoregulated Progressive Resistance Exercise (APRE) is similar to plain old PRE, which some of you may know as linear progression. You show up, do a workout, and next time you throw more weight on the bar. Pretty simple. It also has a tendency to build you up to a plateau that is very hard to break through. Usually you have to go on some more complicated and varied workout to keep improving. Thats where the A-for-autoregulated part comes in. Instead of just mindlessly adding weight each workout, the APRE protocol introduces a little testing and adjusting. Which means Im a fan. Ive discussed elsewhere how I think some kind of linear progression is probably the best idea for most people looking to get strong. The problem is in finding a smart linear progression. I laid out a few options in that post which are worth a look. At the same time, the results of the comparison between APRE and that simple linear progression are intriguing. This fits with a long-held belief of mine: an autoregulated program that has built-in ways to adjust itself will prove superior to any pre-planned workouts. Despite what wed like to believe, the body
3RM Protocol 50% of 3RM 6 reps 75% of 3RM 3 reps Reps to failure with 3RM Adjusted reps to failure
6RM Protocol 50% of 6RM 10 reps 75% of 6RM 6 reps Reps to failure with 6RM Adjusted reps to failure
10RM Protocol 50% of 10RM 12 reps 75% of 10RM 10 reps Reps to failure with 10RM Adjusted reps to failure
Reps in third set (6RM protocol) 0-2 3-4 5-7 8-12 > 13
Adjustment for fourth set (kg) -2.5 to -5 0 to -2.5 No change +2.5 to +5 +5 to +7.5
*The adjustments vary slightly for the 3RM and 10RM protocols, but this is the basic idea.
As you can see, thats not a workout. Thats just some suggestions. But theyre powerful all the same, so what we have to do is decide how to use them in a gym-friendly routine. The templates are influenced by a lot of things.
Now lets take a look at what to do here. First things first, Id group this into two days on, one day off. That is, train Monday-Tuesday, rest Wednesday, then again Thursday-Friday and take the weekend off. This is designed for a heavy-light rotation between the lifts so that everything gets one heavy day and one light day, except the deadlift which doesnt seem to like that much volume. The top lift is the main lift for the day to train hard, the bottom lift gets the easy work. Finally Id make it a point to add in an upperback movement on each day for shoulder health
and overall balance of development. You can get away with skipping this on the day you deadlift. I wouldnt do much assistance work beyond this; maybe a few sets of abs or arms would be about it. The pros: youll get a lot of practice with and exposure to the lifts. The cons: if you arent conditioned to frequent training, if you have a lot of real-life stress, or both, this will probably beat you up pretty good and may not be the best choice.
If that template isnt your cup of tea, heres an alternative. This is a more traditional type of upper/lower or body-part split arrangement that will probably be familiar to most of you. Each day will focus on a big lift and then follow up with assistance work, much like any old powerlifting workout or the 5/3/1 template.
Other Options
As with any of these templates, youre free to adjust them as needed as long as you dont screw up the intent behind them. If you can only train three days a week, then rotate through the four workouts in order. If you dont like an exercise I picked, then replace it with something else. Use your head: if you want to replace a bench press with weighted dips, thats fine. If you want to replace back squats with leg extensions, never speak to me again.
Which protocol?
The APRE gives us three options to choose from: 3RM, 6RM, and 10RM. The paper by Mann et al said they used all three over the six weeks of the study. The paper didnt go into a lot of detail regarding how they used the three, except to say that they used the 6RM option most frequently as it was most compatible with the goals of their football players (i.e., strength and muscle mass). In Supertraining, Siff suggests using the 6RM option for the first 6-8 weeks, then switching to the 3RM version. He suggests that the 10RM version can be used at any point as a way of stimulating hypertrophy and local muscular endurance. Its also noted that the
Examples
Its push press day with close-grip bench as the second exercise. Im starting the cycle with a push press of 803, so the warm-ups are 406, 603, and then the 3RM test set with 80. I hit 6 reps with 80, which means that I should go up to 82.5-85 on the next set. I go to 85 and knock out three reps, so thats where Ill start on the next workout. If Id only hit say 2 or 3 reps, then Id probably clock it back to 77.5 or even 75 on the fourth set, and use it for the next workout. You see how this is not at all unlike 5/3/1, only the number of reps you get determines the weight you use next time. For back-offs it was a good day, so I decide to take 90% and do a few doubles. Top weight was 85, so Ill use 75 for doubles. Since Im still doing close-grips, I dont want to go to fatigue so I do two doubles and call it done. For close-grips, I know Im good for 110 for 6 reps, so Ill stick to around 80% (90) of that for six reps. Upper back work is weighted chins, so I start throwing them in between the back-off sets of push presses and the close-grips. Do a set of pushing, then a set of chins. And thats it. I would add that if you want to do more bodybuilder-ish work, theres nothing stopping you. Do your big lift, maybe the second light lift if you care, and then have fun with chest/shoulders/triceps as you see fit. Id still limit that to a few quality sets of 8-10 reps on a few solid exercises, rather than the usual 5-set
10
Theres been a recent resurgence of interest in frequent daily training and the Bulgarian weightlifting system, and yet very little written about how to adapt this system from weightlifting to more traditional gym-lifting or powerlifting programs. I want to use this article to sketch out some ideas on how to organize such a system. Those of you familiar with Boris Sheikos powerlifting workouts will find a lot of similarities. Sheiko is far more Russian than the system Im going to outline, with a much more structured approach to daily and weekly volume. As different as these systems appear, superficially, they have the same goal to manipulate intensity and volume between harder and lighter workouts, and across heavier and lighter weeks. The Russian-ness of the Sheiko system means a rigid structure. Percentages are planned in advance, as are exercises and working sets for the following month. While this strategy unquestionably works, I prefer a more flexible approach. While the end-goal is the same, the Bulgarian system manipulates intensity and volume using a fluid, self-adjusted system that doesnt require a previous max or confine you to pre-planned numbers. The wisdom behind this method startles most old dogs (or those that like to think of themselves as old dogs): you train with max lifts on a (near) daily basis, and then plan the rest of your workout from that performance. This goes against nearly everything taught by the mainstream strength & conditioning field. And yet, it works. You get your Hardgainers and other recovery minimalists convinced that Doing Less is the only way to succeed, but Im not going to let theoretical arguments argue with my own results. Make no mistake, I was skeptical as anyone until I tried it. A few months later,
11
The Workout
I adapted this system from a variety of sources. John Broz, Glenn Pendlay, Michael Hartman, Jamie Lewis, and Anthony Ditillo would be the largest inspiration. Although this is a Bulgarian-inspired system of training, the target is strength in the pool of core barbell lifts. Yes, Ive heard all the arguments about how you can only train the quick lifts (snatch and clean & jerk) frequently because they dont have an eccentric phase and all of that. Let me address that with two observations. 1. Squatting and pressing movements can be trained in the same way as the quick lifts. It is possible to treat even maximal (above 90%) loads as explosive lifts. They will never be fast, but they can be smooth. Im going to suggest that paying attention to your RPE, how the lift feels on a continuum from smooth to grinding, is critical for making this system work. Your nervous system is remarkably adept at matching your perception of difficulty with its actual difficulty, and were going to make use of that. 2. See the above point about your body being more robust than you think. You have an incredible safety margin built into your movement (see Tim Noakess central governor), and if youre smart about organizing your training according to autoregulatory feedback, you can thrive on a
Pull
The squat is self-explanatory. The mainstay is the back squat, but you can sub in front squats or box squats as you see fit. Pressing can be the bench press, or military press, or push press, or inclines. Pulling means either deadlifts or Olympic pulls (whether full lifts, power versions, or just high pulls) for the lower body, or rowing and chinning movements for the upper. On squat days, I lean towards doing the pull for the upper body. On days with two pulls, you can do one upper and one lower (i.e., deads and chins), or two lower (i.e., snatch pull and power clean). Ill cover more on exercise substitutions further down. Ive found that two big lifts for the day is about right. Youd want to focus most of your effort on the squat (or pull) and press movements, while leaving the third exercise as an easier accessory movement. If youre squatting and pressing hard, leave the pull for an easier upper-back exercise like chin-ups or high-rep (Kroc) rows. You could throw real effort into all three, if you think that will be valuable. I can only tell you what Ive found to be useful for myself. Adding more exercises is certainly possible if youve got the time and energy, but beware. This quickly turns into adding things for the sake of adding things, and you do not want that with this style of training. Keep the exercises to the minimum set of most-effective lifts.
12
Adding Workouts
If you went with the three-day template, youll have the option to start adding workouts as you adapt. These will be light speed sessions at first, limiting weights to around 7080% of your most recent daily max. If you worked up to a 200kg squat on Monday, then you might do a light session the next day with doubles at 140-160kg.
13
Substituting Exercises
Im of two minds on exercise substitution. I think that variety has its place if you arent training for a specific competition (i.e., powerlifting). Variety can be psychologically motivating. You might find that rotating through different kinds of squats (back, front, box) or using different bars (regular, cambered, SSB) is productive. You might likewise use boards or floor presses, or different kinds of overhead work. Pulling can rotate through deadlifts (from the floor, from a deficit, or off blocks at different heights), cleans and snatches, high pulls with clean and snatch grip, or even good mornings. There are no hard rules here. If you want to stick to a pool of just 3-4 movements, thats fine. If you want to rotate, that seems like it would work fine too. What Im getting at is, do what you like and what you find to be most productive.
14
15
No Musts or Oughts
Everything Ive written in this article should be taken with a grain of salt and always subject to your own findings. Ive tried to qualify everything as opinion, either mine or someone I feel is worth listening to, which means that there are no rules. Training this way is very subjective. I cant give you a fixed list of things you should do, or must do, or ought to do. If you disagree with any point I made and find you do better by ignoring my guidelines, I encourage you to keep doing what youre doing. Nothing here is beyond challenge, and I find that the lack of Must Do rules is a strength of this method. There are only good ideas worth trying for yourself. Your success or failure on this system depends entirely on your frame of mind. Walking into this kind of training with a defeatist attitude, convinced that it wont work, that youll overtrain, that youll get hurt, all but guarantees that these things will happen. The first step to success in this program (or any program) is to trust what youre doing. Believing in the program and enjoying what youre doing creates a placebo effect. Your frame of mind can generate stress or it can encourage recovery.
16
17
18
19
Myo-reps
Myo-reps have already integrated the principle of auto-regulation via the exhaustion point. The idea behind the Myo-reps is to achieve maximum fiber activation by training to exhaustion in the first set - the so-called activation kit - and then remain at this point, with successive sets of 2-5 reps with short breaks in Myo-reps series. So there is a balance between fatigue and explosive, effective repetitions at high fiber activation. Since we achieve maximum fiber activation from the first rep when we lift heavier weights in the range of 1-6 reps, it is for the reps up in the range of 6-8 reps to 15-25 reps, that Myo-reps have their distinct advantages. And again - when I say "near exhaustion" lot of people take this literally, and train to exhaustion (RPE 10) on both the activation set and sets of the Myo-reps series. Think explosive, imagine the quality of each repetition - think RPE 8-9 on Myo-reps. Both the amount of exercise and stress are auto-regulated by Myo-reps. In the notation 9-12 3x, 9-12 reps is the activation kit, and sets of 3 reps are Myo-reps series, that you do until you reach a RPE 9 again. Load progress is ensured by using the same weight the next time if you only manage nine reps on the activation kit, and by increasing the weight next time if you manage 12 reps. The number of Myo-reps series after activation kit, and a total number of reps are auto-regulated. You can play with it from workout to workout, because you can also do 2x or 4x instead of 3x, and achieve different effects and training volume by being closer or farther away from exhaustion on every set. Let's say you get 9 reps, and you are close to exhaustion on the activation kit. You can use fewer reps in Myo-reps series, longer breaks, and thus bring in more total reps. So instead of 9+3+3=15 with 5 breathing pause (about 10 seconds) you can do 9+2+2+2+2+2=19 with 10 breathing pause (about 20 seconds). I'm not saying one way is more correct than the other in any situation, as I said earlier in the article that working closer to the point of exhaustion once in a while may be beneficial. The advantage of Myo-reps is just that you will automatically limit the amount of exercise and stress you cause to the system, no matter how you slice it up. Next time, if you became stronger, you could maybe do
20
Volume Training
First we have the classic volume training, for which I use a notation such as 4-6 sets of 8 reps or 3-5 sets of 12 reps, depending on how many exercises I use for the same muscle group. Here I use the recommendations from Wernbom's meta-analysis - 30-60 total reps per muscle group per workout with heavier weights, more reps at lighter weights, up to 80-120 reps if you train in the 15-25 reps range. If you have two exercises that overlap in the same muscle group, divide it up into 2-3 sets of 8 reps or 1-3 sets of 12 reps on each exercise. Volume Training is certainly nothing new, it is an "old school" method to train and most bodybuilders train this way. When you read an article in FLEX and Muscle Mag and see 4 sets of 12 reps of each exercise, there are many who believe that all the sets are trained to exhaustion. Max hardcore intensity explosion, yeah! Those who have seen in reality how these bodybuilders train, knows that this is not true - it is rather "pumping" with relatively light weights in question. Not to mention that both genetics, training experience and pharmaceutical assistance allow these elite bodybuilders to get away with doing 20 sets for biceps. This is not to say that you will get the same results by copying them, rather the contrary. By staying within the guidelines I provide, and auto-regulating, you will get far better results.
21
Drop Set
I also use drop sets, with a notation such as 12 reps -10% -10%. I will illustrate this with an example: The first set is max reps Take 10% weight (it is of course perfectly fine to round up numbers upwards or downwards, to the nearest available weight) Take 5-15 deep breath pause (10 -30 seconds) enough time to change weights and catch your breath Second set is also maximum repetitions New 10% reduction in weight and brief rest Third and final set of max reps again Note that when I say "max repetitions", I still believe that it may be advantageous to remain at RPE 8-9, with RPE 10 (to failure) used only once in a while. Drop rate is kept within the effective range of mechanical loads, so I would not recommended, for example, 15 reps -50% -50% - that is more endurance training than it is resistance training. In the area of 12-15 reps I use the 10% drop, and it may look like this: 50kg x 12 reps, 45kg x 8 reps, 40kg x 7 reps. In the area of 8-12 reps I
Summary
I find it hard to be brief, because I want to describe each method with more detail, but hopefully, you have understand the basics, and also got some useful tools that you can begin to use immediately to improve progress.
22
Growing bigger
Lets first look at the primary identified mechanisms of hypertrophy: I Mechanical deformation: Stretch and contraction under load will initiate a signaling cascade translating into a cellular response, increasing the contractile machinery of the muscle cell. You need to lift weights to grow. Fundamental stuff, indeed. II Motor unit and muscle fiber recruitment: The research is pretty clear on the fact that you eventually need to recruit most of/all of the
23
24
A great summary of the above principles can be found in Keith Baars meta-review. Two things to note here: Kaatsu (blood flow occlusion by pressure cuffs) increases the EMG signal, and hence fiber recruitment earlier. After the first set and a short rest period, you achieve higher fiber recruitment earlier in the subsequent set. This forms the basis for Myo-reps.
25
26
Concluding remarks
As you can see, a Myo-rep set takes advantage of the primary mechanisms of muscle growth mechanical load, increasing fiber recruitment and maintaining it at a high level to get more effective reps, increasing the muscle sensitivity to the growth stimulus via metabolic stress, modulated by the volume effect (total sets and reps) and doing more work in less time. With Myo-reps you can get in and out of the gym in 30 minutes if you are short on time, you can provide a different stimulus to a muscle group from the traditional way of structuring sets and reps, and it can even serve as a deload following a high-volume phase. Myo-reps is a great tool to have in your toolbox in the quest for a massive and strong physique, feel free to play around.with.it.
What exercises?
I wont go much into detail on exercise selection and template structure, there are many ways of programming your training strategy and I would rather save that for a later article. I will just briefly mention that I usually do at least 2 exercises for major muscle groups, and more if it
27