Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Course Formats
Course Formats
H. Zhang
H. Zhang
Student #5/6
Student #7/8
Mar 29
Course Formats
Peer evaluation due date Project final due date Final examination
Course Formats
Course Requirements: (1) (2) (3) Each student is required to make 1 presentation (giving one lecture) on one selected subject as assignment. (30%) Each student is required to submit a review on one subject same as his/her presentations. (30%) (25% given by instructor, 5% by student peer-review) There will be an final examination by the end of the term. (40%) (18% on long questions and 18% on short, multiple-choice questions, plus an additional 4% mark given on review comments provided as part of the peer-review process) Calculators of any kind are permitted during examination. Lecture Presentations The following guidelines are suggested for your presentations: (1) Always present a general picture at the beginning when the topic is introduced (2) Try to start from the basics, explain intuitively (3) Prepare several heading pages to break the talk into sections (4) Use fewer transparencies, but explain each clearly (5) When a figure is presented, always go through the axes, legends etc. first (6) Colour key words/symbols/curves etc. to highlight important information (7) Draw sketches to help illustrate the mechanism and explain your arguments (8) Prepare short summary sheets to highlight your points / conclusions (9) Always try to relate to chemical reactor design
Course Formats
Review Chapter (Project Report) (30% 25% by the instructor, 5% by other students) Reviews/reports are due by 4:00 pm on the announced due date, via email to the instructor. The text part of the review/report should be between 20 to 25 pages, 1.5 spaced typing, not including Notations, References, Figures and Tables, and any Appendix. Your review/report should be a comprehensive review of the subject and can be used as a chapter for future course notes. If the subject is too big, you can limit your discussions to several aspects after you give an overview of the subject. You must also ensure that the review is well written and easy to follow, so that other students can learn the subject from your review. You may also refer to the "review evaluation" section below for other requirements.
Peer Evaluation of the Project Review/Report (4% on your evaluation review) The review/report will also be evaluated by your fellow students, and in turn, you must also evaluate others' reports. Each student is required to submit a 1-2 page evaluation sheet for each review marked, to provide your comments following the points suggested below. A mark (out of 100) should also be given to each review/report. Your evaluation sheets will then be marked by the instructor, counting for 4% of your total course mark. (This is due one week after the review is handed in.) When you evaluate others' review/report, please pay special attention to the following: Is the review/report clearly written? (structure, logic, grammar etc.) Does the review/report give a comprehensive coverage of the subject? Does the review/report provide a good understanding of the subject? Is this a critical review/report, or just a summary of facts without additional analyses? Are the statements made in the review/report correct? Are there any limitations for certain statements made? Are enough references provided? Is the format good, including: overall structure (heading arrangement etc.) quality of tables and figure (too small? no source?) citation of references (clear? correct format?) notation list (complete and clear?)
Course Formats
(4) (5)
References
Assignments No. 1
/30% /30%
Questions ??%/5%
Classroom Participation ??%/5% Students peer Evaluation ??%/5% Marks on Peer Evaluation ?%/5%
Project
/30%
Additional Notes:
References
Student Presentations
Student Name ______________________________ Marks
Presentation #1:
/20%
Knowledge (10%) Explanation (4%) Organization (2%) Visual aids (2%) Voice/Posture (2%)
Questions #1:
/5% 3.0 1.0 1.0 2.4 0.8 0.8 1.8 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.2
Classroom Participation:
/5% 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.6 1.6 0.8 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2
References
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
(40%) 20 10 5 5 16 8 4 4 12 6 3 3 8 4 2 2 4 2 1 1
Additional Comments:
References
Items Chapter introduction, background, significance etc. (correct, clear and easy to follow?) Literature review comprehensive and covering all essential area? Additional analyses and discussions (critical review with additional analyses) New points, arguments, and inputs Figures/tables
(Clear and informative, enough to support the presentations - can draw your own additional figures)
Mark
References (complete?) Structure, logic, grammar (Clear, logical, with enough explanation) Report format (correct?)
(Title, table of content, sections with proper titles, nomenclature, reference citation, with tables and figures inserted right after they are referred. No need for abstract, conclusion and lists of tables/figures.)
Overall impression
10%
Additional comments:
References
References
4.2 Flowability and Flowability Evaluation 4.3 Particle Surface Modifications and Compositional Modifications 4.4 Mechanical/Electrical Dispersion Aids (for Fluidization, Mixing, Reaction and Transportation etc.) 5. Functionalization of Fine Particles 5.1 Particle Surface Functionalizations Physical coating methods Chemical coating methods Equipment for surface funtionalization 5.2 Compositional Functionalizations 5.3 Functionality Evaluation Methods 6. Applications of Fine Powders 6.1 In Plastics Industries 6.2 In Coating Industries 6.3 In Pharmaceutical Industries 6.4 In Powder Metallurgy Industries 6.5 In Other Industries (Environmental, Energy, Electrical, Food, Mineral etc.)
References
Books For All Chapters *Handbook of Powder Science and Technology Chapman & Hall Call# TP156.P3H35 1997 *Introduction to particle technology Wiley, c2008. Call#TP156.P3R48x 2008 For Chapter 2 and 4 Powder Testing Guide: Methods of Measuring the Physical Properties of Bulk Powders Elsevier Applied Science Call# TA418.78.S83 1987 For Chapter 2 and 3 Characterization of Powders and Aerosols Wiley-VCH Call#TA418.8.K388 1999 For Chapter 3 Hand book of Powder Technology, Vol 12: Particle Breakage Elsevier Call# TA418.78.P358 2007 Small Particles Technology
References
Plenum Press Call# TA418.78.O88 1998 Nanoparticle Technology Hand Book Elsvier Call# TA418.78.N356 2007
Papers and Patents For Chapter 2, 4 and 6 Research on the composite dispersion of ultra fine powder in the air Jun Ren, Shouci Lu, Jian Shen, Chunhong Yu, Materials Chemistry and Physics 69 (2001) 204 209 Review on testers for measuring flow properties of bulk solids Jorg Schwedes, Granular Matter 5, 143 _c Springer-Verlag 2003, DOI 10.1007/s10035-0020124-4
For Chapter 3, 4 and 6 Ultrafine powder coatings: An innovation Jesse Zhu and Hui Zhang, Powder Coating, Fluidization Additives to Fine Powders Zhu, J. and H. Zhang, U.S. Patent 6833185. December 21, 2004. In-situ, Simultaneous Milling and Coating of Particulates with Nano-particles Qi Zhang etc, 2009, Powder Technology, POWTEC-D-09-00118 For Chapter 4 and 6 Improving Flowability of Cohesive Particles by Partial Coating on the Surfaces
References
Chunbao Charles Xu, Hui Zhang and Jesse Zhu, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.87, 2009, 403-414 For Chapter 2, 5 and 6 Mechanistic study of the bactericidal action of silver-loaded chabasite on acidithiobacillus thiooxidans T. Haile, G. Nakhla, J. Zhu, H. Zhang, J. Shugg,Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 127 (2010) 3240 Durability of Hydrophilic and Antimicrobial Zeolite Coatings under Water Immersion Cory ONeill, Derek E. Beving, Wilfred Chen, and Yushan Yan, AIChE Journal, 2006 Vol. 52, No. 3, 1157 Antimicrobial zeolite and antimicrobial composition
Yasuo Kurihara , Kumiko Miyake , Masashi Uchida ,
Method for forming self-cleaning coating comprising hydrophobically-modified particles Yuan-chang Huang, etc, US Patent Pub# 2006/0147705A1 Hydrophobic metal particles for magnetorheological composition Vardarajan Iyengar etc. US Patent Pub#: 2002/0000533A1