Sie sind auf Seite 1von 23

Bt Brinjal- Biological Terrorism or Agro-Biotechnology Invention?



At the outset, we would like to express our deep sense of gratitude to Natural Resource Management Centre, NABARD Mrs. T.S.Raji Gain, General Manager for nominating us to carry out this research paper. We would also like to express our sincere gratitude to the Assistant General Manager of NRMC, NABARD, Mr. Mrinal Kanti De for giving us all the opportunities for this research study and sparing his valuable time in exchanging the thoughts. Our special thanks are due to The National Library Kolkata for allowing us and providing information for our research study. We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to our parents for their kindness, inspiration, patience and understanding. And at last but not at the least we would like to express our thanks to our friends for their friendly support.

Thanking you, Nitin Abhishek Swaireeta Dutta B.Sc.LLB School of Law KIIT University

Serial Number Contents Page Number

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18.

Introduction What is Bt Brinjal? What is the Controversy About? What is the Official Response to the Controversy? Why is the Brinjal Important to India? What are the known Features of the Brinjal Crop in India? Genetically Modified Crops and the Bt Brinjal How Plants are Genetically Modified? What is the History of Development of Bt Brinjal in India? Arguments For And Against the Release of Bt Brinjal in India? Is Bt Brinjal A Threat? Bt Toxins Unsafe Collective No to GMO Bt Brinjal has Enormous Potential to Benefit Farmers and Consumers Brinjal And Beyond Decision Rendered by MoeF Conclusion Bibliography

1 2 2 2 3 4 5 7 8 10 12 13 13 14 16 17 19 20

The survey is based upon the invention of Bt Brinjal. The agro-biotechnology product was introduced into the public domain to have a disease resistant product. The scientists claim it to be an invention for the welfare of the farmers and people whereas strict opposition was given by the general people. The positive and negative aspects of it have been dealt in this survey. The objective of the survey is to bring forth the prospects of agro-biotechnology product and to present the view of the common people. The controversy regarding Bt Brinjal has been in the public domain since it was introduced. The future prospect of agro-biotechnology product has also been dealt. The initiatives taken by the Government to arrive at a common conclusion has also been discussed. The survey was carried out by referring to books and journals. Valuable information regarding the survey was gathered by referring to different websites. Important advice was also given by NABARD administrators.

Bt Brinjal is a transgenic brinjal created by inserting a gene cry1Ac from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis into brinjal. This is said to give the brinjal plant resistance against lepidopteran insects like the brinjal fruit and shoot borer Leucinodes orbonalis and fruit borer Helicoverpa armigera. 1


Bt Brinjal has generated much debate in India. The promoters say that Bt Brinjal will be beneficial to small farmers because it is insect resistant, increases yields, is more cost-effective and will have minimal environmental impact. On the other hand, concerns about Bt Brinjal relate to its possible adverse impact on human health and bio-safety, livelihoods and biodiversity.


The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoeF) has a statutory body called the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) which has recommended the environmental release of Bt Brinjal in India based on the recommendations of the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM), a statutory body and two expert committees constituted by the GEAC between 2006 and 2009. However the Minister of State (I/C) for Environment and Forests, responding to strong views raised both for and against the introduction of the Bt Brinjal, has called for public consultations across the country before taking a final decision on this issue.

Available at last visited on 04/06/2011


The brinjal Solanum melongena is said to have originated in India Kingdom : Plantae and is known to have been cultivated for over 4000 years. Second Class: Magnoliopsida only to the potato in terms of the total quantity produced, Subclass : Asteridae the brinjal continues to be an important domestic crop cultivated Order : Solanales across the country accounting for 9% of total vegetable production Family : Solanaceae and covering 8.14% of the land under vegetable cultivation. There Genus : Solanum are approximately 2500 varieties of brinjal in India of various Species : melongena shapes extending from oval or egg-shaped to long or clubshaped and colours ranging from white, yellow, green and purple to nearly black. Many popular commercial varieties of brinjal available today are derivatives of older varieties from India and China. The brinjal is low in calories and fats and contains mostly water, some protein, fibre and carbohydrates. It is also an excellent source of minerals and vitamins and is rich in water soluble sugars and amide proteins among other nutrients. The brinjal is a popular component of the Indian diet across the country. It is an important ingredient in Ayurvedic medicine and is of special value in the treatment of diabetes and liver problems. The brinjal is known to be consumed both cooked and raw. Some of the most well-known brinjal dishes in India include the begun bhaja of Eastern India, the gutti vankaya kura of Andhra Pradesh, the katharikai kozhambu of Tamil Nadu, upperi in Kerala, vangi bath in Karnataka, wangyacha bharit in Maharashtra, olo, bharatu in Gujarat and baingan jhonga in Bihar. Folk songs in different parts of the country such as Guthi vankya kooroyi baava in Andhra Pradesh, Konkani songs in Maharashtra, Jaina in Karnataka, Bihu folk songs in Assam often allude to the brinjal.2 The role of brinjal in religious rituals is best exemplified by one of the traditional varieties in Udupi District of Karnataka called the Mattu Gulla. This particular variety has been cultivated in the region for at least 500 years and is used as an offering to the main deity of the region at the Sode Matha temple.

Series of Crop Specific Biology Documents, Biology of Brinjal, available at http:// last visited on 04/06/2011


The brinjal is usually self-pollinated. However, it has been reported that the extent of crosspollination can range from 2% to as high as 48%. It is thus classified as a cross-pollinated crop. While the biological structure of the anthers favours self pollination, the stigma projects beyond the anthers, thus providing ample opportunity for cross-pollination. The genotype, location, and insect activity further determine the actual rates of natural cross-pollination. Pests affecting the brinjal crop include the brinjal fruit and shoot borer, the brinjal stem borer, the mealy bug, lace wing bug, leaf hopper, leaf rollers, red spider mite, leaf-eating beetle, jassids, aphids, white fly and root knot nematodes. Amongst these the brinjal fruit and shoot borer is the greatest threat and can cause a major loss in the marketable yield. The brinjal crop is typically grown in small plots or as inter crop. The major brinjal producing states in India are West Bengal, Orissa, Bihar, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh. Depending on the variety and the season, the average yield of brinjal varies from 15 to 30 tonnes per hectare. Many of the hybrid varieties have shown a potential yield of upto 50 tonnes/ha. The brinjal is generally considered a high value crop yielding high net benefits for the farmer. Studies have shown an input-output ratio of 1: 2.01. The total area under brinjal cultivation in 2006 according to the National Horticulture Board was 0.55 million hectares, with a total production of 9.13 million tonnes. In 2007-08, India exported 338 tonnes of brinjal worth Rs 1.92 crores. The United Kingdom is the largest importer (258.84 tonnes worth Rs 1.38 crores) followed by countries like Saudi Arabia, France and Germany.3



Supra n1

What is Genetic Engineering? It is a technique involving transfer of a selected piece of genetic material capable of performing new functions from one organism to another. Genetic Modification (GM), Genetic Manipulation and Genetic Engineering (GE) all refer to the same thing. It is also known as recombinant DNA technology.4 What are Genetically Modified (GM) crops? A genetically modified (GM) crop is a plant that has been altered by an external process which alters the genetic make-up of the cells. The modification is accomplished by the insertion of a gene from a different species through genetic engineering. The process of traditional breeding involves finding individual plants with favorable characteristics and crossing them with each Other. The final plant variety or breed of plant will have the desired traits inherited from its ancestors along with the associated genes for those traits. GM technology is used because it can change the genes of an organism in a way not possible through traditional breeding technology. Consequently only GM can engineer totally new plant varieties with traits that range from the ability to survive adverse environmental conditions and pest attacks to a longer shelf life and enhanced nutritional value. What is the history of GM crops in India? In the 1980s, the Indian government took proactive steps to build up the country's R&D capacities in biotechnology through setting up the Department of Biotechnology [DBT]. Recognizing the potential risks in the indiscriminate use of modern biotechnology in healthcare, agriculture, environment and process industries, the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India notified the rules 1989 of the Environment Protection Act (EPA) 1986 to regulate products derived from modern biotechnology. The belief that agrobiotechnology tools like Genetic Engineering could help increase agricultural production in a country where agriculture is the mainstay for the majority of its population has strongly driven government funding and promotion of Genetic Engineering and GM crops. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) were first put on the global market in the early 1990s. Over the past two decades the development of biotechnology tools like Genetic Engineering and Marker Assisted Breeding have opened up new possibilities in increasing agricultural production. The new techniques for understanding and modifying the genetics of living organisms have led to large investments in agro-biotechnology research and development. While Bt cotton is the only transgenic crop which is being commercially cultivated in the country, according to currently available information, 12 crops (11 of which are food crops) are under different stages of development.5

4 5

Available at last visited on 05/06/2011 ibid

The focus of GM research in India is to develop crops that can withstand6: Biotic stress: Pest and disease resistance crops and management of weeds Abiotic stress: Crops tolerant to flood, drought and salinity Product improvement

Supra n5


Genetic modification involving the copying and transfer of genes from other organism to a plant is possible because of the presence of a molecule called deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in every cell of all the organisms. Genes are discreet segments of DNA that encode a set of instructions in the cell and contain all the information concerning the form and functions of all living cells that give characteristics to an organism including plants. The complete set of genes in any plant is called the plant genome. All the cells in a plant carry an identical and complete genome, which means every cell contains at least one copy of every gene, although it may not be active. By switching different combinations of genes on or off cells develop into different types e.g. leaf, root and flower cells in plants.7 The first step is to identify a particular characteristic from any organism (plant, animal or microorganism) and find out which gene or genes in the organism are responsible for producing that characteristic. Once a gene has been isolated, a gene construct is prepared consisting of a promoter sequence, a termination sequence and a marker gene for successful integration and expression in the plant genome. The next step is the plant transformation i.e. uptake and establishment of introduced DNA. There are two main methods for transformation of plants i.e. the Agrobacterium mediated method and the gene gun method. There are a number of ways through which genetic modifications of plants are accomplished. Essentially, the process has five main steps: Isolation of the genes of interest Insertion of the genes into a transfer vector Transfer of the vector to the organism to be modified Transformation of the cells of the organism Selection of the genetically modified organism (GMO) from those that have been successfully modified8 Following the gene insertion process, plant tissues are transferred to a selective medium containing an antibiotic or herbicide, depending on which selectable marker was used. Only plants expressing the selectable marker gene will survive and it is assumed that these plants will also possess the transgene of interest. Thus, subsequent steps in the process use these surviving plants. To obtain whole plants from transgenic tissues such as immature embryos, they are grown under controlled environmental conditions in a series of media containing nutrients and hormones by tissue culture. Once whole plants are generated and they produce seeds, evaluation of the progeny begins. To verify whether the inserted gene has been stably incorporated without detrimental effects to other plant functions, product quality, or the intended agro ecosystem, initial evaluation includes attention to activity of the introduced gene, stable inheritance of the gene and unintended effects on plant growth, yield, and quality. The plant is then crossed with improved varieties of the crop because only a few varieties of a given crop can be efficiently transformed, and these generally do not possess all the producer and consumer qualities required of modern cultivars. The initial cross with the improved variety must be followed by several

Available at last visited on 06/06/2011 ibid

cycles of repeated crosses to the improved parent, a process known as backcrossing. The goal is to recover as much of the improved parent's genome as possible, with the addition of the transgene from the transformed parent. The next step in the process is multi-location and multiyear evaluation trials in greenhouse and field environments to test the effects of the transgene and overall performance. This phase also includes evaluation of environmental effects and food safety9.


Chronology of the development and approval of Bt Brinjal 2000 2001-2002 2002-2004 Transformation and greenhouse breeding for integration of cry1Ac gene into brinjal hybrids and seed purification. Preliminary greenhouse evaluation to study growth, development and efficacy of Bt brinjal. Confined field trials to study pollen flow, germination, aggressiveness and weediness, biochemical, toxicity and allergenicity studies and backcrossing into the regular breeding programme. RCGM approves conducting multi-location research trials of seven Bt brinjal hybrids. Through a MoU under the aegis of Agribiotechnology Support Programme II (ABSP II) of USAID Mahyco shares the technology with TNAU, DAU and IIVR to develop open pollinated varities of Bt Brinjal. Back crossing and integration of EE1 into 4 varities of TNAU, Coimbatore and 6 varities of UAS, Dharwad is done. Biosafety data on the effects of Bt brinjal on soil micro-flora, efficacy against fruit-shoot borer, pollen flow, germination, aggressiveness and weediness; toxicity and allergenicity studies, chemical composition etc submitted to the Review Committee on Genetic Modification (RCGM). RCGM recommends large scale trials to the GEAC. Mahyco submits bio-safety data to Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) and seeks permission for large scale trials. GEAC posts the biosafety data on Bt brinjal on GEAC website GEAC constitutes a sub committee to look into the concerns raised by civil society. Supreme Court stops ongoing field trials of GM crops due to a PIL filed by civil society representatives. The subcommittee submits its report, recommends that 7 more studies on biosafety be repeated for reconfirmation of data generated during confined multilocation trials but gives a green signal for large scale trials. Supreme Court lifts ban on GM crop field trials subject to conditions such as isolation distance etc.

2004 2005




Supra n5


2009 Oct 14th 2009 Oct 15th

GEAC approves large scale trial. As per GEAC direction, Indian Institute of Vegetable Research [IIVR] takes up the responsibility of large scale trails of Mahyco's Bt Brinjal trials at 10 research institutions across the country in 2007 and 11 in 2008 . January- IIVR submits the results of the large scale trails. Due to concerns raised by several stakeholders including some national and international experts, GEAC constitutes a 2nd sub-committee [Expert committee 2 or EC2] to look into adequacy of biosafety data generated as well as the concerns raised by all stake holders. The Subcommittee submits its report based on which GEAC approves the environmental release of Bt Brinjal containing the event EE1. Responding to strong views expressed both for and against the release of the Bt Brinjal, the Minister of State for Environment and Forests (I/C) (to whom the GEAC reports) announces a nationwide consultation in January and February of 2010 pending a final decision on this issue.10


Available at last visited on 06/06/2011

The development of Bt brinjal and the regulation process so far have caused a raging debate in the country on the relevance and need for a Bt brinjal. This debate has revolved and evolved around issues of its safety to human health, environment, farmers' seed rights, consumer choice etc. Industry promoters as well as public and private sector scientists consider Bt Brinjal a breakthrough in agricultural research and development in India. On the other hand opponents including scientists, civil society groups, farmers unions and even some political parties argue that the risks far exceed the benefits.11

Arguments made in favour of Bt brinjal

Brinjal cultivation involves usage of huge amounts of pesticide. 60% of plant protection cost is for controlling fruit and shoot borer. Small and marginal farmers use 25-80 sprays of pesticides in Brinjal cultivation

Arguments made against Bt brinjal

Effective non-pesticide pest management and Integrated Pest Management exist and is being practiced by farmers. The question of internal destruction of pests is dangerous to the health of the consumer. The integrated pest management systems, in combination with good farming practices, are the only healthy solution to good crops. A healthy farm ecosystem is the key to pest management. This includes selection of good seeds, appropriate irrigation system and improving soil quality India is a centre of origin and diversity of brinjal which has been cultivated here for over 4000 years. There are about 2000 varieties grown across India. The transgene transfer to local and hybrid varieties of brinjal will effectively destroy our brinjal diversity. As a general rule GM crops should not be cultivated in the center of origin as it could lead to the loss of original varieties by transgenic cross pollination. Inadequacy of tests :No third party or independent tests have been conducted so far on the Bt impact on human health The longest study has been a 90 day subchronic test on a healthy adult rat. This does not address the possible health impact on

There is no threat to wild brinjal germplasm as brinjal S. melongena, the cultivated variety, does not cross naturally with any of the wild relatives to produce fertile offspring Bt brinjal does not exhibit any different agronomic or morphological traits compared to non-Bt brinjal that may give it a competitive advantage over other species in the ecosystem.

Bt brinjal has been found to be safe for human consumption and safe for the environment. Human health concerns due to pesticide use can be reduced with this transgenic brinjal and its in-built resistance to pests.

Available at last visited on 06/06/2011

humans of Bt brinjal as brinjal is a regularly eaten vegetable Farmers will be able to continue to save and re- Majority of the farmers in India are small and use their seeds for the hybrids varieties. marginal farmers, so the possibility for maintaining isolation distances is inexistent. Mahyco, the developer of the technology, says they have shared it with three Indian public sector research institutions, Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University and Dharwad Agricultural University, to create Open Pollinated Varieties (OPVs) which would help the small and marginal farmers benefit from the technology at a low price. While Mahyco shared the truncated gene cry1Ac construct they developed with the public sector research institutions, there are conditions in the MoU stopping these institutions from developing their own hybrids or having a free hand in marketing of the OPVs.12


Supra n12

Against Bt Brinjal-----


Bt toxins are derived from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringenesis. Natural Bt toxins have never been authorized for mammalian consumption and are known to be harmful to health. Seralinis appraisal also cautions against synthetic and genetically modified Bt toxins such as the hybrid toxin contained in Bt brinjal that mixes two toxins, the Cry 1 Ab and Cry1Ac engineered sequences together. Another flaw in the Monsanto-Mayhco toxicity tests on non-target insects was that the single toxin Cry1Ac was used because this was easier than the hybrid. 13 Debjeet Sarangi, speaking for GM Free India said he was surprised that the regulatory bodies did not consider it appropriate to consult the Health Minister, as well as doctors' groups and other associations before pushing this highly toxic food down the gullets of an uninformed public. This is not science, he said. If regulators such as the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) had been doing long term research to assess the claims of GM crop companies and taken up the analysis of the company's data itself then the two year large scale trials of Bt brinjal approved in 2007 would not have been allowed to go ahead. In fact, the results only came to light when a Supreme Court battle forced GEAC to put the Monsanto-Mahyco test dossier on Bt brinjal into the public domain.

Brinjal ( Solanum melongena ) also known as aubergine or egg plant is an important vegetable in India 's food culture and consumed every day by rich and poor alike. Concern about GM crops and Bt brinjal in particular has prompted the PMK ( Pattali Makkal Katchi) party Health Minister Dr Anbumani Ramadoss to speak out against them, and the first government minister to do so . He said: When there are so many indigenous varieties of brinjal in each region of India , where is there a need to borrow this Bt brinjal from other countries? He called for collective opposition to GM crops and has the support of farmers, consumers, environmental organizations, and women's and organic farming groups from all over India.14 India is the home of brinjal, where it has been cultivated for four thousand years without the help of fertilizers or pesticides. So far, over 70,000 Indians have signed the I am No Lab Rat anti-GM protest in India that is also battling large scale cultivation of Bt cotton. GM Free India says that alternative strategies for pest management exist and pests only became a problem after the introduction of the Green Revolution. Agriculture is a culture that should receive holistic treatment and not the piecemeal introduction of highly toxic inputs that poison a regions daily food.


Available at last visited on 07/06/2011 Available at last visited on 07/06/2011


In favour of Bt Brinjal-----


Bt Brinjal its need, benefits, safety and partnership & collaborative efforts was at the focus of the discussion at the 7th Pacific Rim Conference on the Biotechnology of Bacillus thuringiensis and its environmental impact organized by ICAR, DBT, Calcutta University and AICBA, at National Agricultural Science Complex, New Delhi. Key speakers from the industry and scientific community made presentations to the delegates from all over the world who include leading scientists, industry professionals, academicians and students of Biotechnology. Bt brinjal has been indigenously developed by Indian seed & biotech company Mahyco, in collaboration with public sector institutions. Researched over a period of nine years, Bt Brinjal will be the first genetically modified food crop to be cleared for commercial cultivation in India and the first genetically modified brinjal in the world. The Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC), the Indian regulatory authority, has approved Bt brinjal for environmental release in India and its commercial release is subject to the approval from the Ministry of Environment & Forests, in 2010.15 Mahyco has donated Bt brinjal technology to public research institutions to benefit a large number of resource-poor vegetable farmers in India. The Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, and the University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS), Dharwad have successfully back-crossed event EE-1 into locally adapted open-pollinated brinjal varieties. Both these institutions are testing and evaluating different open-pollinated Bt brinjal varieties under the multi-location research acai berry trials (MLRTs) and these varieties are likely to be made available to farmers in the near future. Additionally the technology has been shared internationally with University of Philippines, Bangladesh Agriculture Research Institute and East West Seeds Bangladesh for development of different varieties of Bt Brinjal. Dr. Bharat Char, Lead Biotechnology Mahyco, in his presentation on Shoot and Fruit Borer Resistant Bt Brinjal, mentioned that Bt Brinjal incorporates the cry1Ac expressing insecticidal protein to confer resistance against fruit and shoot borer and is compositionally identical to conventional brinjal, with same nutritional value. He said, With Bt brinjal, farmers will use 70% less insecticide for FSB control and, as a result, 42% less pesticide overall for control of all insect pests. In addition to the reduced pesticide use, overall yield of marketable fruit is expected to rise 116% over conventional hybrids and 166% over conventional varieties. Higher yields and better quality produce would result in higher net income for brinjal farmers amounting to Rs 16,000-19,000 per acre, approximately Rs 2,000 crores to farmers across India.


Article dated November 30, 2009, available at last visited on 07/06/2011

Dr. B. Mazumdar, Bejo Sheetal Seeds Pvt. Ltd., in his presentation on Bt Brinjal An example of Public Private Partnership shared the success story of public private partnership for development of Bt Brinjal and its commercialization. NRCPV, IARI , New Delhi has developed Bt Brinjal technology indigenously and collaborated with Beejo Sheetal Seeds Ltd. Jalna for technology application and commercialization. Bt Brinjal was developed using a transformation process similar to the one used in the development of Bt Cotton. While replying queries from the delegates Dr, Mazumdar said Bt Brinjal has enormous camsex potential to acai berry benefit both farmers and consumers. The Chairperson for the session was Prof A. Zaritsky from Ben-Gurion University, Israel and the rapporteur was Dr. Sajiv Anand, Director All India Crop Biotechnology Association.16


Supra n16


The Genetic Engineering Approval Committees recommendation that Bt brinjal be commercialized is a significant marker in the countrys slow and somewhat hesitant embrace of agro-biotechnology. The nod has come a full seven years after approval for the countrys first transgenic crop Bt cotton. But Bt brinjal is the countrys first approved genetically modified (GM) food crop and the decision of the GEAC, the high-level committee under the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests, may be read as an affirmation of a key principle. It is that transgenic seeds will be approved for commercialization as long as they adhere to the bio safety and other requirements demanded by the regulatory process. This may well spur the process for clearance of other transgenic food crops at different stages of the regulatory and approval process. It is imperative that Union Minister for Environment and Forests Jairam Ramesh, who says he will study the GEACs recommendation in depth before giving a final stamp of approval, bases his decision solely on the body of scientific data, culled from Bt brinjal trials. He should ignore the huge pressure from organizations that have no time for the scientific evidence while claiming to speak for the environment and the public. It is not just the organic movement but also the pesticide industry lobby that is viscerally opposed to Bt crops, which acquire a pest-resistant character with the introduction of a gene derived from a common soil bacterium ( bacillus thuringiensis).17 Introduced commercially in the United States in the mid-1990s, genetically modified crops have expanded substantially in recent years. An estimated 125 million hectares were under such cover in 2008 in 25 countries, including China, Brazil, Egypt, and Australia. Even in GM-phobic Europe, seven countries, including Germany and Portugal, grow genetically modified maize commercially. It is nobodys case that the massive spread of agro-biotechnology is proof of its safety. Indias regulatory process must continue to put transgenic plants through a battery of rigorous tests for toxicity, allergenicity, bio safety, agronomic worth, and so forth before recommending commercial release. It is also important that the country addresses issues such as labeling GM products through an independent regulatory process that commands public confidence. Legislation must be speedily introduced to set up a National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority, as recommended in 2004 by a task force led by eminent agricultural scientist M.S. Swaminathan. In a country where agricultural productivity and food security are vital issues, agro-biotechnology holds great promise. We need to regulate its application, not allow it to be strangled by misconceived or motivated campaigns.18

17 18

Available at last visited on 08/06/2011 ibid


Bt brinjal will not make it to your dinner table for now. The Environment Ministry announced its decision to impose a moratorium on the release of the transgenic brinjal hybrid developed by Mahyco, a subsidiary of global seed giant Monsanto. The moratorium will last till such time independent scientific studies establish, to the satisfaction of both the public and professionals, the safety of the product from the point of view of its long-term impact on human health and environment, including the rich genetic wealth existing in brinjal in our country, said Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh.19 Public consultations The Ministers decision comes after a month of public consultations in seven cities, which were attended by approximately 8,000 people. They were organized after widespread protests against the Genetic Engineering Approval Committees (GEAC) recommendation of approval of Bt brinjal in October 2009. Mr. Ramesh attributed the decision to several factors: the lack of clear consensus among the scientific community opposition from 10 State governments, especially from the major brinjal-producing States questions raised about the safety and testing process the lack of an independent biotechnology regulatory authority negative public sentiment and fears among consumers and the lack of a global precedent

My decision is both responsible to science and responsive to society, he said adding he did not come under pressure from any quarter in arriving at the decision. Fresh studies Mr. Ramesh said the moratorium period would be used to commission fresh scientific studies and reform the testing process. If you need long term toxicity tests, then you must do it, no matter how long it take there is no hurry. There is no overriding urgency or food security argument for Bt brinjal, he said. Our objective is to restore public confidence and trust in the Bt brinjal product. If it cannot be done, so be it. The moratorium period should also be used to operationalise an independent regulatory authority and hold a parliamentary debate on private investment in agricultural biotechnology. I dont believe India should be dependent on the private sector seed industry, said Mr. Ramesh. I believe seeds are as strategic to India as space and nuclear issues.20

19 20

Available at last visited on 08/06/2011 ibid

Independent biotechnology regulator India needs an independent biotechnology regulator and a transparent testing system, according to Union Minister of State for Environment And Forests Jairam Ramesh, who declared a moratorium on Bt brinjal. As a first step in the transparency process, he said the Genetic Engineering Approvals Committee (GEAC), which had recommended approval of Bt brinjal last October, would soon have a name change with Approvals changed to Appraisal.21 Its psychologicalmore than a name change, its a mindset change, Mr. Ramesh told. People should not think they are coming for automatic approvals. They take it for grantedThey must remember that we have a right to reject it as well. If approved, Bt brinjal would have been the worlds first genetically modified vegetable. While Indian farmers already produce Bt cotton, Mr. Ramesh said that a food crop had to be handled with more caution. Tests for food products must be made more stringent than tests for drugsThat has not been the case in Bt brinjal. He was careful to say that his decision should not be read as an indictment of genetic engineering or discourage research to develop crop improvement tools. I have not decided on the future of Bt bhindi or tomato or rice. This is a rejection of this particular case for the time beingFuture proposals has to be examined and decided on a case-by-case basis, he said. However, Mr. Ramesh said there was no question of a review of the moratorium until there is scientific consensus, public confidence and agreement on the tests needed for health and safety. With several international experts criticizing the GEACs testing norms, the Minister said that the Committee must become more transparent. A National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority has been on the anvil for six years and will be set up during the moratorium period, he said. He defended the transparency of his own decision. My conscience is clear. I have followed a democratic, transparent, often acrimonious process, he said, adding that the reports on the public consultations as well as letters from the State governments, scientists and other stakeholders were all addressed to him. I had to balance science and society, producers and consumers, Centre and States.22

21 22

Supra n20 ibid

The dispute over Bt Brinjal still continues and a proper decision has not yet been reached neither by the Ministry Of Environment And Forests nor by the general public and scientists. The invention of Bt Brinjal is a work of research and biotechnology. With the recent development in science and technology Bt Brinjal was introduced into the public domain to benefit them. The invention was introduced to have a brinjal plant resistance against lepidopteran insects and to have better yield through which the farmers of India would benefit. The transgenic brinjal hybrid is developed by Mahyco, a subsidiary of global seed giant Monsanto. The key argument used by those who support BT brinjal is that it will boost yields while reducing dependence on pesticides. On average, a brinjal crop undergoes between 50-80 rounds of pesticide spraying. The invention rather being accepted was hugely criticized by the general public, NGOs and Government. Large scale protests were held all throughout India against it. Consumption of Bt Brinjal would affect arguing that the genes were toxic and would affect the health of the consumers. Several studies on Bt crops in particular and GM crops in general show that there are many potential health hazards in foods bio-engineered in this manner. GM-fed animals in various studies have shown that there are problems with growth, organ development and damage, immune responsiveness and so on. The debate still continues whether Bt Brinjal should be used for human consumption or not. The biotechnology techniques that are introduced into agricultural products for the benefit of common people still need to be answered and dealt properly. The decision rendered by Union Minister of State for Environment And Forests Jairam Ramesh, to put a suspension on Bt Brinjal until proper investigation is done is justified as public safety is more important.

1. 2. Centre for Sustainable Agriculture (2006). Briefing Paper on Bt Brinjal. Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, Secunderabad, 3. Information on GM crops/foods and related issues in India. Accessed at

4. Kapoor, L., D (1990). Handbook of ayurvedic medicinal plants. CRC Press LCC, Florida, USA. 5. Kavitha, K and G. V. Ramanjaneyulu (2008). Genetic Engineering in Indian Agriculture: An Introductory Handbook (For private circulation only). Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, Secunderabad. 6. Report of the Expert Committee (EC-II) on Bt Brinjal Event EE- 1.: (2009) Developed by: M/s Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Company Ltd. (Mahyco), Mumbai, University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS), Dharwad and Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore. Genetic Engineering Approval Committee, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi 7. 8. Sadashivappa, P and M. Qaim, (2009). Bt Cotton in India: Development of Benefits and the Role of Government Seed Price Interventions. Agro BioForum, 12(2): 172-183. 9. Shukla, V and L.B. Naik (1993). Agro-techniques of solanaceous vegetables, In Advances in Horticulture', Vol. 5, Vegetable Crops, Part 1 (edited by K. L. Chadha and G. Kalloo). Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi, p. 365 (sic). 10. Series of Crop Specific Biology Documents, Biology of Brinjal. 11.