HELLENIC AIR NAVIGATION SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY

HANSA 2012 monitoring report

for the Performance Plan of GREECE

RP1 2012-2014

DOCUMENT SIGN OFF SHEET

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Document Title HANSA 2012 monitoring report for the Performance Plan of Greece REFERENCE PERIOD 1 2012-2014 MEMBER STATE: ORGANIZATION WHICH REPRESENTS MEMBER STATE: CONTACT PERSON: K. Anastasopoulou GREECE HELLENIC AIR NAVIGATION SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY (HANSA) TEL: +30210 8984133 UNIT: HANSA

DOCUMENT APPROVAL AUTHORITY HANSA NAME & SIGNATURE PANAGIOTOPOULOS M. DATE 08/07/2013

ACTING DIRECTOR

VERSION Final

DATE OF ISSUE 08/07/2013

Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................5

1.1 Period covered by the monitoring report and reference to Performance Plan. 5 1.2 Description of deviations from assumptions in the Performance Plan..............5 1.3 Description of sources and dates of data used in the monitoring report/ data completeness.............................................................................................................7 1.4 Follow up on recommendations of the Commission ..........................................7 2. Safety ..................................................................................................................8 2.1.1. Achievement of Safety KPIs/PIs: ................................................................8 Effectiveness of Safety Management (State and ANSP level): ...............................8 Application of the severity classification of the Risk Analysis Tool (RAT) methodology: ............................................................................................................8 Just Culture (State and ANSP level): .........................................................................9 2.1.2. Achievement level of all additional safety KPIs/PIs, if any, from the Performance Plan ......................................................................................................9 3. 3.1 Capacity ..............................................................................................................9 Achievement of Capacity KPIs/PIs .................................................................9

3.2 Achievement level of additional capacity KPIs/PIs, if any, from the Performance Plan ..............................................................................................................................10 3.3 4 Description of achievement .............................................................................10 Environment .....................................................................................................11

4.1 Achievement of Environment KPIs/PIs ................................................................11 4.2 Achievement of additional environment KPIs/PIs, if any, from the Performance Plan ..............................................................................................................................11 4.3 Description of achievement .................................................................................12 5 Cost-efficiency .....................................................................................................12 Achievement of Cost-efficiency KPIs/PIs .....................................................12 5.1.1.

En-route Determined Unit rate (and in particular en route actual costs as well as service units): ...............................................................................................................12 Terminal air navigation services costs and unit rates: ................................................13 5.1.2. Achievement of additional cost-efficiency KPIs/PIs, if any, from the Performance Plan ........................................................................................................13 5.1.3. Description of achievement .........................................................................13 5.1.4. Information on the difference between the determined costs and the actual costs caused by uncontrollable costs; ..............................................................14
3

Reporting on uncontrollable costs: .............................................................................14 6 6.1 6.2 7 Investment reporting...........................................................................................15 Reporting of capital expenditure: ....................................................................15 Change in investment planning: ......................................................................16 Conclusions on overall performance as observed in reporting period ............16

ANNEX .....................................................................................................................18

1. Introduction 1.1 Period covered by the monitoring report and reference to Performance Plan. This report covers the year 2012 of the first reference period (2012-2014.) 1.2 Description of deviations from assumptions in the Performance Plan. The general picture of the evolution of the Greek economy is presented in the following table1:
Greece (annual percentage changes unless specified) 2011 2012

GDP Total domestic demand (contribution) Private consumption Public consumption Foreign balance (contribution) Exports of goods and services Imports of goods and services GDP deflator GDP at current prices (billion ) GDP at current prices CPI (annual average) HICP (annual average) Core inflation (annual average)

-7.1 -9.5 -7.7 -5.2 2.3 0.3 -7.3 1.0 208.5 -6.1 3.3 3.1 1.0

-6,4 -10.2 -9.1 -4.2 3.5 -2.4 -13.8 -0.8 193.7 7.1 1.5 1.0 -0.3

Unemployment (annual average rate)

17.7

24.2

HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY, THE GREEK ECONOMY 2013 28 June http://www.statistics.gr/portal/page/portal/ESYE/BUCKET/General/greek_economy_28_06_ 2013.pdf 5

According to EUROSTAT2, the real GDP growth rate volume as a percentage change on previous year, was calculated as follows:
Year GDP (%, yoy) P. Plan forecast 2009 -3.1
p

2010 -4.9
p

2011 -7.1
p

2012 -6.4
p

-2.3

-4.2

-3.0

1.1

As far as the inflation rates3 concerns, the annual average rate of change (%) was formed as presented in the following table:
Year Inflation (%, yoy) P. Plan forecast 2009 1.3 1.35 2010 4.7 4.70 2011 3.1 2.54 2012 1.0 0.50

The traffic trend for 20124, as opposed to the one estimated at the beginning of the reference period, was:
Period 2012 ER service unit [NPP] 4,698,000 ER service unit [actual] 4,357,569 [act. vs. NPP] -7.2%

After the February 2012 agreement on a Second Economic Adjustment Programme and the large-scale debt restructuring operation in March 2012, a period of uncertainty surrounded the implementation of the programme. Nonetheless, there has been a significant catching-up over the past few months. With the recent crucial decisions and the extent of the commitments under the new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), Greece has revamped its reform effort and fulfilled important conditions.

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=t ec00115
3

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&language=en&pcode=tec00118& tableSelection=1&footnotes=yes&labeling=labels&plugin=1
4

http://prudata.webfactional.com/Dashboard/pp_view_2012.html 6

1.3 Description of sources and dates of data used in the monitoring report/ data completeness. The origin of the key data used and reported in this annual monitoring report are from official and/or well established sources such as EUROSTAT, the IMF and the PRU Dashboard. All data and their source are mentioned in the footnotes of each page. 1.4 Follow up on recommendations of the Commission The Commission Recommendation (2012/C 228/01)5 on the implementation of performance plans and targets in consistency with the European Union-wide performance targets adopted pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 and the preparation for the second performance reference period included Greece in the part of improving its capacity target. Given the circumstances in 2012 Greece managed to improve its target6: Plan/target Period [annual] 2012 1.10 Actual Total [YTD] [min.] 0.15 96,693 Capacity/ staffing [%] 58.4% ATC other [%] 41.5% Weather Other [%] [%] 0.0% 0.1%

As far as the cost effectiveness target of the Performance Plan, it was in line with and consistent to the EU wide targets:
2012

En-route Unit Rate Real en-route determined unit rate/unit cost in national currency (at 2009 prices) % n/n-1

Currency NPP 32,55

Actual

32,73 0.55%

5 6

OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 1 http://prudata.webfactional.com/Dashboard/pp_view_2012.html 7

2. Safety The Safety reporting is fed by the on-line survey, as it was performed by EASA in February 2013 and presented on the PRU on line dashboard. 2.1.1. Achievement of Safety KPIs/PIs: Effectiveness of Safety Management (State and ANSP level): Reporting Status of Effectiveness of safety management GREECE 2012 2013 State level 40.2% HANSP 42.1% (based on AMC/GM in EASA ED Decision 2011/017R)

2014

Application of the severity classification of the Risk Analysis Tool (RAT) methodology: Reporting Separation Minima Infringements (SMIs) 2012 2013 2014 % % % Number severity Number severity Number severity GREECE of assessed of assessed of assessed reported reported reported with with with SMIs RAT SMIs RAT SMIs RAT ATM ground value 0% ATM overall value 95% Reporting Runway Incursions (RIs) 2012 % severity assessed with RAT

2013 % severity assessed with RAT

2014 % severity assessed with RAT

GREECE

Number of reported RIs

Number of reported RIs

Number of reported RIs

ATM ground value 75% ATM overall value 18% Reporting ATM specific technical events (ATM) GREECE 2012 2013 % % Number severity Number severity of assessed of assessed reported reported with with ATM RAT ATM RAT ATM overall value 87% (based on AMC/GM in EASA ED Decision 2011/017/R)

2014 Number of reported ATM % severity assessed with RAT

Just Culture (State and ANSP level): Part I: No of questions answered with YES or NO STATE Number of questions answered with: Policy and its implementation Legal/Judiciary Occurrence reporting and investigation Total Yes 5 4 0 9 No 5 4 2 11

HANSP Number of questions answered with: Policy and its implementation Legal/Judiciary Occurrence reporting and investigation Total

Yes 7 3 4 14

No 6 0 4 10

It is recognised that the total number of NO answers may not reflect an absence of Just Culture. 2.1.2. Achievement level of all additional safety KPIs/PIs, if any, from the Performance Plan The Performance Plan of Greece for the first reference period (2012-2014) did not contain any additional safety KPIs/PIs. 3. Capacity 3.1 Achievement of Capacity KPIs/PIs Minutes of en route ATFM delay per flight (national KPI): 2012 1.10 0.15 -0.95 2013 1.00 2014 0.95

Minutes of ATFM Delay per flight Greece Target Actual Difference

Total of ATFM delays attributable to terminal and airport air navigation services (for monitoring purposes): 2014

Minutes of ATFM Delay attributable to terminal and airport ANS Greece 2012 2013 Actual 0.02

The additional time in the taxi out phase (for monitoring purposes): 2012 1.28 2013 2014

Additional time in taxi out phase Greece Actual

The additional time for arrival sequencing and metering area (ASMA) (for monitoring purposes): 2014

Additional time for Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) Greece 2012 2013 Actual 0.7

3.2 Achievement level of additional capacity KPIs/PIs, if any, from the Performance Plan The Performance Plan of Greece for the 1st reference period did not contain additional capacity KPIs/PIs. 3.3 Description of achievement The main reason behind the actual capacity target for 2012 is the traffic that declined substantially. In this it should be added the E.C. recommendation of 26-72012 which was asking for better capacity rates for Greece and ANSP staff efforts. According to the forecast summary of the annual total en-route service units 20132014, as presented in the EUROCONTROL 7-year IFR Flight Movements and Service Units Forecast: 2013-2019 of February 2013, the latest forecasts for the service units are:
Charging Area 2012 Actual TSU 4,357,569 2013 STATFOR Forecast TSU 4,344,504 2013/2012 Forecast Growth -0.3% 2014 STATFOR Forecast TSU 4,545,947 2014/2013 Forecast Growth 4.6% 2013 States Forecast TSU 4,860,000 2013 STATFOR/ States -10.6%

Greece

From the above table it is evident that the forecasts calculated by STATFOR and used by Greece as data for the Performance Plan projections were considerably off target resulting in discrepancies in actual capacity and cost efficiency (traffic risk sharing). Furthermore, if the 2013 estimation of STATFOR is to be materialized (-10.6%), an alert mechanism will need to be activated which will cause further implications especially from the traffic risk sharing mechanism. This is an important issue that needs to be attended so that data that is obligatory to use is as accurate as possible.

10

Nevertheless, and despite the grim outlook for the Eurozone the country's key source region which affected the prospects for Greek tourism in 2012, recovery is expected from 2013 onwards. Greek tourism revenues are expected to bounce back this year to pre-crisis levels, according to industry and government experts. 2013 is expected to be a record year in terms of foreign tourist arrivals. If this forecast is met, receipts will rise to their highest level since 2009.This leaves room for estimating that the amount of the actual service units for 2013 might be better than forecasted. If this situation materializes, the existing personnel, who are additionally expected to decrease due to scheduled retirements, cannot easily cope with significant traffic increase. On the other hand, there is no clear evidence so far that investments for infrastructure can be undertaken on time so that they could lead to capacity increase. The economic situation in Greece, being under the Economic Support Mechanism, and the austerity measures taken, in conjunction with the fact that the ANSP staff is part of the public sector, cannot guarantee immediate actions in personnel recruitment nor investments. In order to ensure that improved capacity targets will be achieved the next years of the reference period, the following elements should be taken into consideration by all parties and stakeholders involved: Retention of existing number of personnel as a minimum with eventual recruitment if necessary to maintain present operational levels. Continuous monitoring on personnel training. Timely implementation of necessary investments. Incentives to personnel for their full commitment in achieving the targets. 4 Environment 4.1 Achievement of Environment KPIs/PIs Effective use of civil-military airspace structures (for monitoring purposes) The data for this section is presently not available. 4.2 Achievement of additional environment KPIs/PIs, if any, from the Performance Plan The Performance Plan of Greece for the 1st reference period did not contain any environment KPIs/PIs.
11

4.3 Description of achievement Not applicable for the Performance Plan of Greece (no KPIs/PIs set) for the 1st Reference Period 5 Cost-efficiency

In this section and sub-sections, the following items are being described: The reported actual costs and their difference against the determined costs; The reported actual service units and their differences against the forecast; The amounts resulting from uncontrollable costs by nature and by factor.

5.1.1. Achievement of Cost-efficiency KPIs/PIs En-route Determined Unit rate (and in particular en route actual costs as well as service units): 2012 2013 2014 En-route Unit Rate Total ANS costs in nominal terms (in national currency) Inflation % Inflation index (100 in 2009) Total ANS costs in real terms (in national currency at 2009 prices) Total en-route Service Units Real en-route determined unit rate/unit cost in national currency (at 2009 prices) % n/n-1 Currency NPP Actual NPP
Actual

NPP

Actual

165.000.188

155.483.966

165.541.828

165.909.828

0,5% 107,9

1,0% 109,0

0,7% 108,6

1,0% 109,6

152.928.670

142.612.925

152.420.985

151.322.256

4.698.000

4.357.569

4.860.000

5.041.000

32,55

32,73

31,36

30,02

0.55%
12

As with the capacity target, the service units originally forecasted by STATFOR were off target resulting in Greeces being out of the -2% dead band of the traffic risk sharing mechanism. Terminal air navigation services costs and unit rates: Terminal air navigation services costs and unit rates Greece 2012 Terminal ANS costs Actual 21.002.810 Terminal Unit Rate (1/1/2012 -31/3/2012) Actual 228,37 Terminal Unit Rate (1/4/2012 -31/12/2012) Actual 74,68 Terminal Service Units Actual 82.938

2013

2014

5.1.2. Achievement of additional cost-efficiency KPIs/PIs, if any, from the Performance Plan The Performance Plan of Greece for the 1st reference period did not contain additional cost-efficiency KPIs/PIs. 5.1.3. Description of achievement According to the PRB assessment report of Performance Plans for RP1, Greeces Performance Plan is assessed as passing the Unit rate level check. The PRB also noted that there were good indications from Greeces Performance Plan that the identified areas for improvement were effectively addressed in RP1. In line with its commitment to SES objectives, the actual real en-route determined unite rate for 2012 increased by only 0.55% compared to the unit rate originally forecasted. The unit rate for 2012 was achieved without any financial incentives been applied.

13

5.1.4. Information on the difference between the determined costs and the actual costs caused by uncontrollable costs; Reporting on uncontrollable costs: In nominal terms (in national currency) Total uncontrollable costs Uncontrollable costs by entity State/NSA ANSP METSP Uncontrollable costs by nature Staff Other operating costs Depreciation Cost of capital Exceptional items Uncontrollable costs by factor Unforeseen changes in pension regulations Unforeseen changes in national taxation law Unforeseen new cost item required by law Unforeseen changes from international agreements Significant changes in interest rates on loans Total to be carried over to RP2 -866.270 2012 -866.270 Actual data 2013

2014

-866.270

-866.270

-866.270

Uncontrollable costs refer to the difference between EUROCONTROL costs as forecasted in the Performance Plan of Greece and the actual costs charged.

14

6 Investment reporting The difference between the investments of the ANSP recorded in the performance plan and the actual spending on the relevant projects, as well as between the planned date of entry into operation of these investments and the actual situation is reported in this section and sub-sections: 6.1 Reporting of capital expenditure:

The following table presents updated data for capital expenditure: Investments Years: 2012 2014 Amount of Capital Date of entry into Name of investment Expenditures operation (as specified in Planned Actual Updated Planned Actual Updated Performance Plan) Upgrade of PALLAS 2011 5.250.000 System main 8.060.000 2014 2015 FDPS/RDPS/ODS 2009 PATROCLOS 2013 2.250.000 2012 Upgrade (FDPS) HACAS Hellenic 20111.800.000 2014 AFTN/CIDIN AMHS 2016 Athinai/Makedonia 20118.500.000 2015 ACC main VCS/RCS 2014 Five (5) Airports 20122.400.000 2.900.000 2015 VCS/RCSs 2014 Thessaloniki /Makedonia 2009 3.800.000 2013 International Airport 2012 SMR/ASMGCS Elementary Mode S 2012radar SENSOR at 1.750.000 2014 2014 Himittos CRISTAL ADS B 2012OUT (In coop. with 600.000 2014 2013 EUROCONTROL) Comparing the updated data with the ones provided in the original Performance Plan of Greece it is noted that in two occasions the amount of the capital expenditure has been recalculated and in all the cases the date of entry into operation has moved forward.

15

6.2

Change in investment planning:

Despite the strict budget of the ANSP that did not allow the full implementation of the CAPEX as originally described in the Performance Plan of Greece, the following systems have been put into operation: EN ROUTE % 100 Amount of Date of TERMINAL Capital entry into % Expenditures operation () 100 2012 152.320 100 100 2012 2012 2012 242.059 90.500 550.000

SYSTEM F/S Samos Airport Upgrade of three (3) Mini AFTN centers Better signal selection devices (BSS) RMCDE Upgrade

Conclusions on overall performance as observed in reporting period

The overall view on achieved performance for Greece is positive. Both Capacity and Cost effectiveness targets were consistent and in line with the EU targets as set out in the Commission Decision No 2011/121/EU of 21 February 2011 setting the European Union-wide performance targets and alert thresholds for the provision of air navigation services for the years 2012 to 2014. The only area that did not comply fully with the forecasts in the Performance Plan is the CAPEX due mainly to the strict austerity measures taken. Furthermore, the capacity target should be seen in conjunction with the downturn in traffic.

7.1.

Interpretation and justification of the developments of the various KPIs and PIs by the national supervisory authorities:

Capacity, which originally was the only target that was not in line with the EU wide targets, improved dramatically though mainly due to loss of traffic. The new target of 0.15 Minutes of en-route ATFM delay per flight that was achieved in even lower that the EUROCONTROL reference value of 0.37 Minutes of en-route ATFM delay per flight for 2012.

16

Capacity KPI ANSP Minutes of enroute ATFM delay per flight EUROCONTROL ANSP reference value Performance Plan ANSP forecast ANSP Actual

2012 F Intermediate Value 0.37 1.10 0.15

2013 F Intermediate Value 0.32 1.00

2014 T

0.26 0.95

The cot-effectiveness target remained in line with the one forecasted in the original Performance Plan of Greece.
ER costs ER costs ER service [actual] ER service [NPP] Period unit (real terms, unit [NPP] (real terms, [actual] 2009 2009 prices) prices) 2012 2013 2014 4,698,000 4,357,569 152,928,670 142,612,900 4,860,000 5,041,000 152,420,985 151,322,256 Inflation Inflation ER DUR [NPP] [actual] [NPP] (2009 (2009 (EURO) =100) =100) 107.9 108.6 109.6 109.0 32.55 31.36 30.02 ER DUR [actual] (EURO) 32.73

It is important to note that no alert mechanisms were activated. In the context of further improving its services, Greece also established Safety KPIs for ATM/ANS for the monitoring of the first reference period.

7.2.

Key conclusions of the monitoring in this reporting period:

The monitoring in this reporting period shows that Greece, despite its economic difficulties and their related implications, managed to be in line and contribute greatly to the pan European targets as set out in the Commission Decision No 2011/121/EU of 21 February 2011.

7.3

Presentation of the planned performance for future reporting year(s):

For the two remaining years of the first reference period, Greece is aiming at reaching its goals as they were presented in its Performance Plan leaving room for improvement were possible.

17

ANNEX The reporting tables referred to in the relevant annexes of the revised charging Regulation are attached to this annual monitoring report.
Table 1 - Total Costs and Unit Costs Charging zone name Currency Entity name: GREECE Euro All Entities
Forecast Determined costs (performance plan)

Period of reference : 2012-2014

Actual costs

Cost details 1. 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Detail by nature (in nominal terms) Staff Other operating costs (1) Depreciation Cost of capital Exceptional items Total costs Total % n/n-1 Staff % n/n-1 Other op. % n/n-1 Detail by service (in nominal terms) Air Traffic Management Communication (2) Navigation (2) Surveillance (2) Search and rescue

2010F

2011F

2012

2013

2014

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

122.033,0 33.509,0 7.400,0 3.400,0 0,0 166.342,0

118.533,0 32.534,0 7.200,0 3.450,0 0,0 161.717,0 -2,8% -2,9% -2,9%

119.632,7 34.304,7 7.498,0 3.568,8 0,0 165.004,2 2,0% 0,9% 5,4%

119.632,7 34.692,3 7.598,0 3.618,8 0,0 165.541,8 0,3% 0,0% 1,1%

119.632,7 34.960,3 7.648,0 3.668,8 0,0 165.909,8 0,2% 0,0% 0,8%

121.426,7 33.233,0 7.344,5 3.381,9 0,0 165.386,0

109.983,6 35.541,0 7.302,3 3.523,1 0,0 156.350,1 -5,5% -9,4% 6,9%

110.829,4 33.643,9 7.432,2 3.578,4 0,0 155.484,0 -0,6% 0,8% -5,3%

2. 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

139.854,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

140.434,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

141.213,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

141.691,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

141.791,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

140.056,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

135.055,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

135.113,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

18

2.6 Aeronautical Information (2) 2.7 Meteorological services (2) 2.8 Supervision costs 2.9 Other State costs (1) 2.10 Total costs Total % n/n-1 ATM % n/n-1 CNS % n/n-1 3. Complementary information (in nominal terms) Average asset base 3.1 Net book val. fixed assets 3.2 Adjustments total assets 3.3 Net current assets 3.4 Total asset base Cost of capital % 3.5 Cost of capital pre tax rate 3.6 Return on equity 3.7 Average interest on debts Cost of common projects 3.8 Total costs of common projects Costs exempted from cost sharing (Article 14(2)(b)) 3.9 Total costs exempted from cost sharing

0,0 10.654,0 3.272,0 12.562,0 166.342,0

0,0 8.654,0 1.566,0 11.063,0 161.717,0 -2,8% 0,4%

0,0 9.612,0 2.077,4 12.101,8 165.004,2 2,0% 0,6%

0,0 9.612,0 2.077,4 12.161,4 165.541,8 0,3% 0,3%

0,0 9.612,0 2.077,4 12.429,4 165.909,8 0,2% 0,1%

0,0 9.698,0 3.272,0 12.360,0 165.386,0

0,0 7.918,7 2.186,1 11.189,9 156.350,1 -5,5% -3,6%

0,0 8.580,7 719,3 11.070,7 155.484,0 -0,6% 0,0%

137.228,6 0,0 0,0 137.228,6 2,5% 4,0%

123.017,6 0,0 0,0 123.017,6 2,8% 4,1%

105.002,3 0,0 0,0 105.002,3 3,4% 4,1%

105.002,3 0,0 0,0 105.002,3 3,4% 4,1%

105.002,3 0,0 0,0 105.002,3 3,5% 4,1%

137.200,0 0,0 0,0 137.200,0 2,5% 4,0%

123.000,0 0,0 0,0 123.000,0 2,9% 4,1%

106.555,0 0,0 0,0 106.555,0 3,4% 4,1%

-866,3

4. Total costs after deduction of costs for services to exempted flights (in nominal terms) 4.1 Costs for exempted VFR flights 523,0 523,0 523,0 523,0 523,0 523,0 523,0 523,0

19

4.2 Total determined/actual costs

165.819,0

161.194,0

164.481,2

165.018,8

165.386,8

164.863,0

155.827,1

154.961,0

5. Cost-efficiency KPI - Determined Unit Rate/Actual Unit Cost (in real terms) 5.1 Inflation % (3) 5.2 Price index (4) 5.3 Total costs real terms (5) Total % n/n-1 5.4 Total Service Units Total % n/n-1 5.5 DUR / Unit cost Total % n/n-1 4,70% 104,7 158.874,9 4.406,1 36,06 2,54% 107,4 150.631,5 -5,2% 4.560,1 3,5% 33,03 -8,4% 0,50% 107,9 152.928,7 1,5% 4.698,0 3,0% 32,55 -1,5% 0,66% 108,6 152.421,0 -0,3% 4.860,0 3,4% 31,36 -3,7% 0,95% 109,6 151.322,3 -0,7% 5.041,0 3,7% 30,02 -4,3% 4,70% 104,7 157.961,8 4.454,0 35,47 3,10% 107,9 144.841,4 -8,3% 4.546,4 2,1% 31,86 -10,2% 1,00% 109,0 142.612,9 -1,5% 4.357,6 -4,2% 32,73 2,7%

Costs and asset base items in '000 - Service units in '000 (1) Including EUROCONTROL costs (see details in Table 3). (2) To be left empty when such services are provided under the provisions of Article 3 (3) Actual/forecast inflation used for establishing the determined costs in nominal terms actual/revised forecast inflation (4) Forecast price index - base 100 in 2009 Actual price index - base 100 in year 2009 (5) Determined costs (performance plan) in real terms actual/revised forecast costs at 2009 prices

20

Table 1 - Total Costs and Unit Costs Charging zone name Currency Entity name: GREECE Euro ANSP
Forecast Determined costs (performance plan)

Period of reference : 2012-2014

Actual costs

Cost details 1. 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Detail by nature (in nominal terms) Staff Other operating costs (1) Depreciation Cost of capital Exceptional items Total costs Total % n/n-1 Staff % n/n-1 Other op. % n/n-1 Detail by service (in nominal terms) Air Traffic Management Communication (2) Navigation (2) Surveillance (2) Search and rescue Aeronautical Information (2) Meteorological services (2) Supervision costs Other State costs (1)

2010F

2011F

2012

2013

2014

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

122.033,0 20.947,0 7.400,0 3.400,0 0,0 153.780

118.533,0 21.471,0 7.200,0 3.450,0 0,0 150.654 -2,0% -2,9% 2,5%

113.197,6 19.185,5 7.016,0 3.379,8 0,0 142.779 -5,2% -4,5% -10,6%

113.197,6 19.513,5 7.116,0 3.429,8 0,0 143.257 0,3% 0,0% 1,7%

113.197,6 19.513,5 7.166,0 3.479,8 0,0 143.357 0,1% 0,0% 0,0%

115.275,7 18.073,0 6.781,5 3.197,9 0,0 143.328,0

104.900,3 21.511,7 6.838,7 3.370,7 0,0 136.621,3 -4,7% -9,0% 19,0%

104.772,0 20.025,6 6.907,0 3.408,7 0,0 135.113,3 -1,1% -0,1% -6,9%

2. 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9

139.854,0

140.434,0

141.213,0

141.691

141.791,0

140.056,0

135.055,3

135.113,3

10.654,0 3.272,0 0,0

8.654,0 1.566,0 0,0

0,0 1.566,0 0,0

0,0 1.566,0 0,0

0,0 1.566,0 0,0

0,0 3.272,0 0,0

0,0 1.566,0 0,0

0,0

21

2.10 Total costs Total % n/n-1 ATM % n/n-1 CNS % n/n-1 3. Complementary information (in nominal terms) Average asset base 3.1 Net book val. fixed assets 3.2 Adjustments total assets 3.3 Net current assets 3.4 Total asset base Cost of capital % 3.5 Cost of capital pre tax rate 3.6 Return on equity 3.7 Average interest on debts Cost of common projects 3.8 Total costs of common projects Costs exempted from cost sharing (Article 14(2)(b)) 3.9 Total costs exempted from cost sharing

153.780

150.654 -2,0% 0,4%

142.779 -5,2% 0,6%

143.257 0,3% 0,3%

143.357 0,1% 0,1%

143.328,0

136.621,3 -4,7% -3,6%

135.113,3 -1,1% 0,0%

137.228,6 0 0 137.228,6 2,5% 4,0%

123.017,6 0 0 123.017,6 2,8% 4,1%

105.002,3 0 0 105.002,3 3,2% 4,1%

105.002,3 0 0 105.002,3 3,3% 4,1%

105.002,3 0 0 105.002,3 3,3% 4,1%

137.200,0 0,0 0,0 137.200,0 2,3% 4,0%

123.000,0 0,0 0,0 123.000,0 2,7% 4,1%

106.555,0 0,0 0,0 106.555,0 3,2% 4,1%

4. Total costs after deduction of costs for services to exempted flights (in nominal terms) 4.1 Costs for exempted VFR flights 4.2 Total determined/actual costs 523,0 153.257,0 523,0 150.131,0 523,0 142.256,0 523,0 142.734,0 523,0 142.834,0 523,0 142.805,0 523,0 136.098,3 523,0 134.590,3

5. Cost-efficiency KPI - Determined Unit Rate/Actual Unit Cost (in real terms) 5.1 Inflation % (3) 4,70% 2,54% 0,50% 0,66% 0,95% 4,70% 3,10% 1,00%

22

5.2 Price index (4) 5.3 Total costs real terms (5) Total % n/n-1 5.4 Total Service Units Total % n/n-1 5.5 DUR / Unit cost Total % n/n-1

104,7 146.876,8 4.406,1 33,33

107,4 140.326,8 -4,5% 4.560,1 3,5% 30,77 -7,7%

107,9 132.330,0 -5,7% 4.698,0 3,0% 28,17 -8,5%

108,6 131.902,5 -0,3% 4.860,0 3,4% 27,14 -3,6%

109,6 130.752,4 -0,9% 5.041,0 3,7% 25,94 -4,4%

104,7 136.894,0 4.454,0 30,74

107,9 126.564,9 -7,5% 4.546,4 2,1% 27,84 -9,4%

109,0 123.928,5 -2,1% 4.357,6 -4,2% 28,44 2,2%

Costs and asset base items in '000 - Service units in '000 (1) Including EUROCONTROL costs (see details in Table 3). (2) To be left empty when such services are provided under the provisions of Article 3 (3) Actual/forecast inflation used for establishing the determined costs in nominal terms actual/revised forecast inflation (4) Forecast price index - base 100 in 2009 Actual price index - base 100 in year 2009 (5) Determined costs (performance plan) in real terms actual/revised forecast costs at 2009 prices

Table 1 - Total Costs and Unit Costs Charging zone name Currency Entity name: GREECE Euro MET
Forecast Determined costs (performance plan)

Period of reference : 2012-2014

Actual costs

Cost details 1. Detail by nature (in nominal terms)

2010F

2011F

2012

2013

2014

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

1.1 Staff 1.2 Other operating costs (1)

5.926,0 3.015,0

5.926,0 3.015,0

5.926,0 3.015,0

6.151,0 2.800,0

4.465,6 2.836,9

5.488,1 2.397,6

23

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6

Depreciation Cost of capital Exceptional items Total costs Total % n/n-1 Staff % n/n-1 Other op. % n/n-1 Detail by service (in nominal terms)

482,0 189,0 0,0 9.612,0

482,0 189,0 0,0 9.612,0 0,0% 0,0% 0,0%

482,0 189,0 0,0 9.612,0 0,0% 0,0% 0,0%

563,0 184,0 0,0 9.698,0

463,7 152,4 0,0 7.918,7 -18,3% -27,4% 1,3%

525,2 169,7 0,0 8.580,7 8,4% 22,9% -15,5%

2.

2.1 Air Traffic Management 2.2 Communication (2) 2.3 Navigation (2) 2.4 Surveillance (2) 2.5 Search and rescue 2.6 Aeronautical Information (2) 2.7 Meteorological services (2) 2.8 Supervision costs 2.9 Other State costs (1) 2.10 Total costs Total % n/n-1 ATM % n/n-1 CNS % n/n-1 3. Complementary information (in nominal terms) Average asset base 3.1 Net book val. fixed assets 3.2 Adjustments total assets 3.3 Net current assets 3.4 Total asset base Cost of capital %

9.612,0

9.612,0

9.612,0

9.698,0

7.918,7

8.580,7

9.612,0

9.612,0 0,0%

9.612,0 0,0%

9.698,0

7.918,7 -18,3%

8.580,7 8,4%

24

3.5 Cost of capital pre tax rate 3.6 Return on equity 3.7 Average interest on debts Cost of common projects 3.8 Total costs of common projects Costs exempted from cost sharing (Article 14(2)(b)) 3.9 Total costs exempted from cost sharing

4. Total costs after deduction of costs for services to exempted flights (in nominal terms) 4.1 Costs for exempted VFR flights 4.2 Total determined/actual costs 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 9.612,0 0,0 9.612,0 0,0 9.612,0 0,0 9.698,0 0,0 7.918,7 0,0 8.580,7

5. Cost-efficiency KPI - Determined Unit Rate/Actual Unit Cost (in real terms) 5.1 Inflation % (3) 5.2 Price index (4) 5.3 Total costs real terms (5) Total % n/n-1 5.4 Total Service Units Total % n/n-1 5.5 DUR / Unit cost Total % n/n-1 4,70% 104,7 0,0 4.406,1 0,00 2,54% 107,4 0,0 4.560,1 3,5% 0,00 0,50% 107,9 8.908,6 4.698,0 3,0% 1,90 0,66% 108,6 8.850,2 -0,7% 4.860,0 3,4% 1,82 -4,0% 0,95% 109,6 8.766,9 -0,9% 5.041,0 3,7% 1,74 -4,5% 4,70% 104,7 9.262,7 4.454,0 2,08 3,10% 107,9 7.335,8 -20,8% 4.546,4 2,1% 1,61 -22,4% 1,00% 109,0 7.870,4 7,3% 4.357,6 -4,2% 1,81 11,9%

Costs and asset base items in '000 - Service units in '000 (1) Including EUROCONTROL costs (see details in Table 3). (2) To be left empty when such services are provided under the provisions of Article 3 (3) Actual/forecast inflation used for establishing the determined costs in nominal terms actual/revised forecast inflation

25

(4) Forecast price index - base 100 in 2009 Actual price index - base 100 in year 2009 (5) Determined costs (performance plan) in real terms actual/revised forecast costs at 2009 prices

Table 1 - Total Costs and Unit Costs Charging zone name Currency Entity name: GREECE Euro NSA
Forecast Determined costs (performance plan)

Period of reference : 2012-2014

Actual costs

Cost details 1. 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Detail by nature (in nominal terms) Staff Other operating costs (1) Depreciation Cost of capital Exceptional items Total costs Total % n/n-1 Staff % n/n-1 Other op. % n/n-1 Detail by service (in nominal terms)

2010F

2011F

2012

2013

2014

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

12.562,0

11.063,0

509,0 12.104,2

509,0 12.163,8

509,0 12.431,8

12.360,0

617,7 11.192,3

569,3 11.220,7

12.562,0

11.063,0

12.613,2 14,0% 9,4%

12.672,8 0,5% 0,0% 0,5%

12.940,8 2,1% 0,0% 2,2%

12.360,0

11.810,1 -4,4% -9,4%

11.790,0 -0,2% 0,3%

2.

2.1 Air Traffic Management 2.2 Communication (2)

26

2.3 Navigation (2) 2.4 Surveillance (2) 2.5 Search and rescue 2.6 Aeronautical Information (2) 2.7 Meteorological services (2) 2.8 Supervision costs 2.9 Other State costs (1) 2.10 Total costs Total % n/n-1 ATM % n/n-1 CNS % n/n-1 3. Complementary information (in nominal terms) Average asset base 3.1 Net book val. fixed assets 3.2 Adjustments total assets 3.3 Net current assets 3.4 Total asset base Cost of capital % 3.5 Cost of capital pre tax rate 3.6 Return on equity 3.7 Average interest on debts Cost of common projects 3.8 Total costs of common projects Costs exempted from cost sharing (Article 14(2)(b)) 3.9 Total costs exempted from cost sharing

12.562,0 12.562,0

11.063,0 11.063,0 -11,9%

511,4 12.101,8 12.613,2 14,0%

511,4 12.161,4 12.672,8 0,5%

511,4 12.429,4 12.940,8 2,1%

12.360,0 12.360,0

620,1 11.190 11.810,1 -4,4%

719,3 11.070,7 11.790,0 -0,2%

0,0

0,0

0,0

0,0

0,0

0,0

0,0

0,0

-866,3

4. Total costs after deduction of costs for services to exempted flights (in nominal terms)

27

4.1 Costs for exempted VFR flights 4.2 Total determined/actual costs

0,0 12.562,0

0,0 11.063,0

0,0 12.613,2

0,0 12.672,8

0,0 12.940,8

0,0 12.360,0

0,0 11.810,1

0,0 11.790,0

5. Cost-efficiency KPI - Determined Unit Rate/Actual Unit Cost (in real terms) 5.1 Inflation % (3) 5.2 Price index (4) 5.3 Total costs real terms (5) Total % n/n-1 5.4 Total Service Units Total % n/n-1 5.5 DUR / Unit cost Total % n/n-1 4,70% 104,7 11.998,1 4.406,1 2,72 2,54% 107,4 10.304,6 -14,1% 4.560,1 3,5% 2,26 -17,0% 0,50% 107,9 11.690,1 13,4% 4.698,0 3,0% 2,49 10,1% 0,66% 108,6 11.668,4 -0,2% 4.860,0 3,4% 2,40 -3,5% 0,95% 109,6 11.803,0 1,2% 5.041,0 3,7% 2,34 -2,5% 4,70% 104,7 11.805,2 4.454,0 2,65 3,10% 107,9 10.940,8 -7,3% 4.546,4 2,1% 2,41 -9,2% 1,00% 109,0 10.814,0 -1,2% 4.357,6 -4,2% 2,48 3,1%

Costs and asset base items in '000 - Service units in '000 (1) Including EUROCONTROL costs (see details in Table 3). (2) To be left empty when such services are provided under the provisions of Article 3 (3) Actual/forecast inflation used for establishing the determined costs in nominal terms actual/revised forecast inflation (4) Forecast price index - base 100 in 2009 Actual price index - base 100 in year 2009 (5) Determined costs (performance plan) in real terms actual/revised forecast costs at 2009 prices

28

Table 2 - Unit rate calculation Charging zone name : GREECE Entity name : All entities Unit rate calculation 2010 2011 Period of reference : 2012-2014

2012

2013

2014

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

1. Determined costs in nominal terms and inflation adjustment Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. - Table 1 Actual inflation rate - Table 1 Forecast inflation rate - Table 1 Inflation adjustment (1) : year n amount to be carried over

165.819,0 4,7% 4,7%

161.194,0 3,1% 2,5%

164.481,2 1,0% 0,5% 1.721

165.018,8 0,7% 0

165.386,8 1,0% 0

2. Forecast and actual total service units 2.1 Forecast total service units (performance plan) 2.2 Actual total service units 2.3 Actual / forecast total service units (in %) 3. Costs subject to traffic risk sharing Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. (reported from Table 1) Inflation adjustment : amount carried over to year n Traffic : amounts carried over to year n Traffic risk sharing : add. revenue carried over to year n Traffic risk sharing : revenues losses carried over to year n Costs exempt from cost sharing : amounts carried over to year n Bonus or penalty for performance Over(-) or under(+) recoveries (2) : amounts carried over to year n Total for the calculation of year n unit rate

4.406,13 4.454,00

4.560,08 4.546,41

4.698,00 4.357,57 92,8%

4.860,00 0,00

5.041,00 0,00

3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9

153.257,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 5.702,0 158.959 0,0 0,0 0,0

150.131 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 10.138,0 160.269 0,0 0,0 0,0

142.256 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1.635,0 143.891 0,0 -5.224,2 -5.224,2

142.734 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 -1.054,0 141.680 0,0 0,0 0,0

142.834 1.488,5 118,5 0,0 5.224,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 149.665 0,0 0,0 0,0

3.10 Traffic risk sharing : add. rev. year n to be carried-over 3.11 Traffic risk sharing : revenue loss year n to be carried-over 3.12 Over/under recoveries from traffic variations n to be carried-over

29

Parameters for traffic risk sharing 3.13 % additional revenue returned to users in year n+2 3.14 % loss of revenue borne by airspace users 4. Costs not subject to traffic risk sharing Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. (Table 1) Inflation adjustment : amount carried over to year n Traffic : amounts carried over to year n Costs exempt from cost sharing : amounts carried over to year n Restructuring costs : amounts carried over to year n Over(-) or under(+) recoveries (2) : amounts carried over to year n Total for the calculation of year n unit rate

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7

12.562 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 12.562 0,0

11.063 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 11.063 0,0

22.225 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 22.225 -1.610,5

22.285 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 22.285 0,0

22.553 232,6 1.610,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 24.396 0,0

4.8 Over/under recoveries from traffic variations n to be carried-over 5. Other revenues - applied unit rate (in national currency) Total other revenues Total revenues from Public Authorities of which Union assistance programmes of which National public funding Commercial activities Other other revenues

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 171.521,0 38,93 36,08 0,00 2,85 38,93

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 171.332,0 37,57 35,15 0,00 2,43 37,57

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 166.116,2 35,36 30,63 2,05 2,68 35,36

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 163.964,8 33,74 29,15 1,98 2,61 33,74

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 174.061,1 34,53 29,69 2,06 2,77 34,53

5.7 Grand total for the calculation of year n unit rate 5.8 Year n unit rate (in national currency) 5.9 ANSP component of the unit rate 5.10 MET component of the unit rate 5.11 NSA-State component of the unit rate 5.12 Year n unit rate that would have applied without other revenues

30

Costs, revenues and other amounts in '000 Euro - Service units in '000 (1) Cumulated impact of yearly differences between actual and forecast inflation adjustment of the total determined costs (2) Over/under recoveries incurred up to the year of entry into force of the determined cost method

Table 2 - Unit rate calculation Charging zone name : GREECE Entity name : ANSP Unit rate calculation 2010 2011 Period of reference : 2012-2014

2012

2013

2014

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

1. Determined costs in nominal terms and inflation adjustment Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. - Table 1 Actual inflation rate - Table 1 Forecast inflation rate - Table 1 Inflation adjustment (1) : year n amount to be carried over

153.257,0 4,7% 4,7%

150.131,0 3,1% 2,5%

142.256,0 1,0% 0,5% 1.488,5

142.734,0 0,7%

142.834,0 1,0%

2. Forecast and actual total service units 2.1 Forecast total service units (performance plan) 2.2 Actual total service units 2.3 Actual / forecast total service units (in %) 3. Costs subject to traffic risk sharing Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. (reported from Table 1) Inflation adjustment : amount carried over to year n Traffic : amounts carried over to year n Traffic risk sharing : add. revenue carried over to year n Traffic risk sharing : revenues losses carried over to year n

4.406,13 4.454,00

4.560,08 4.546,41

4.698,00 4.357,57 92,8%

4.860,00

5.041,00

3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5

153.257,0

150.131,0

142.256,0 0,00 0,00 0,0

142.734,0 0,00 0,00 0,0

142.834,0 1.488,5 118,5 0,00 5.224,2

31

3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9

Costs exempt from cost sharing : amounts carried over to year n Bonus or penalty for performance Over(-) or under(+) recoveries (2) : amounts carried over to year n Total for the calculation of year n unit rate

5.702,0 158.959,0

10.138,0 160.269,0

0,0 1.635,0 143.891,0 0,0 -5.224,2 -5.224,2

0,00 -1.054,0 141.680,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

0,00 0,0 149.665,2 0,0 0,0 0,0

3.10 Traffic risk sharing : add. rev. year n to be carried-over 3.11 Traffic risk sharing : revenue loss year n to be carried-over 3.12 Over/under recoveries from traffic variations n to be carried-over Parameters for traffic risk sharing 3.13 % additional revenue returned to users in year n+2 3.14 % loss of revenue borne by airspace users 4. Costs not subject to traffic risk sharing Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. (Table 1) Inflation adjustment : amount carried over to year n Traffic : amounts carried over to year n Costs exempt from cost sharing : amounts carried over to year n Restructuring costs : amounts carried over to year n Over(-) or under(+) recoveries (2) : amounts carried over to year n Total for the calculation of year n unit rate

70% 70%

70% 70%

70% 70%

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7

4.8 Over/under recoveries from traffic variations n to be carried-over 5. Other revenues - applied unit rate (in national currency) Total other revenues Total revenues from Public Authorities of which Union assistance programmes of which National public funding Commercial activities Other other revenues

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

32

5.7 Grand total for the calculation of year n unit rate 5.8 Year n unit rate (in national currency) 5.9 ANSP component of the unit rate 5.10 MET component of the unit rate 5.11 NSA-State component of the unit rate 5.12 Year n unit rate that would have applied without other revenues

158.959,0 36,08

160.269,0 35,15

143.891,0 30,63

141.680,0 29,15

149.665,2 29,69

36,08

35,15

30,63

29,15

29,69

Costs, revenues and other amounts in '000 Euro - Service units in '000 (1) Cumulated impact of yearly differences between actual and forecast inflation adjustment of the total determined costs (2) Over/under recoveries incurred up to the year of entry into force of the determined cost method

Table 2 - Unit rate calculation Charging zone name :GREECE Entity name : MET Unit rate calculation 2010 2011 Period of reference : 2012-2014

2012

2013

2014

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

1. Determined costs in nominal terms and inflation adjustment Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. - Table 1 Actual inflation rate - Table 1 Forecast inflation rate - Table 1 Inflation adjustment (1) : year n amount to be carried over

0,0 4,7% 4,7%

0,0 3,1% 2,5%

9.612,0 1,0% 0,5% 100,58

9.612,0 0,7%

9.612,0 1,0%

2. Forecast and actual total service units 2.1 Forecast total service units (performance plan) 2.2 Actual total service units 2.3 Actual / forecast total service units (in %)

4.406,1 4.454,0

4.560,1 4.546,4

4.698,0 4.357,6 92,8%

4.860,0

5.041,0

33

3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9

3. Costs subject to traffic risk sharing Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. (reported from Table 1) Inflation adjustment : amount carried over to year n Traffic : amounts carried over to year n Traffic risk sharing : add. revenue carried over to year n Traffic risk sharing : revenues losses carried over to year n Costs exempt from cost sharing : amounts carried over to year n Bonus or penalty for performance Over(-) or under(+) recoveries (2) : amounts carried over to year n Total for the calculation of year n unit rate

3.10 Traffic risk sharing : add. rev. year n to be carried-over 3.11 Traffic risk sharing : revenue loss year n to be carried-over 3.12 Over/under recoveries from traffic variations n to be carried-over Parameters for traffic risk sharing 3.13 % additional revenue returned to users in year n+2 3.14 % loss of revenue borne by airspace users 4. Costs not subject to traffic risk sharing Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. (Table 1) Inflation adjustment : amount carried over to year n Traffic : amounts carried over to year n Costs exempt from cost sharing : amounts carried over to year n Restructuring costs : amounts carried over to year n Over(-) or under(+) recoveries (2) : amounts carried over to year n Total for the calculation of year n unit rate

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7

0,0

0,0

9.612,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 9.612,0 -696,51

9.612,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 9.612,0

9.612,0 100,58 696,51 0,0 0,0 10.409,1

0,0 0,0

0,0 0,0

4.8 Over/under recoveries from traffic variations n to be carried-over 5. Other revenues - applied unit rate (in national currency) 5.1 Total other revenues

34

5.2 Total revenues from Public Authorities 5.3 of which Union assistance programmes 5.4 of which National public funding 5.5 Commercial activities 5.6 Other other revenues 5.7 Grand total for the calculation of year n unit rate 5.8 Year n unit rate (in national currency) 5.9 ANSP component of the unit rate 5.10 MET component of the unit rate 5.11 NSA-State component of the unit rate 5.12 Year n unit rate that would have applied without other revenues 0,0 0,0 9.612,0 9.612,0 10.409,1

0,00

0,00

2,05

1,98

2,06

0,00

0,00

2,05

1,98

2,06

Costs, revenues and other amounts in '000 Euro - Service units in '000 (1) Cumulated impact of yearly differences between actual and forecast inflation adjustment of the total determined costs (2) Over/under recoveries incurred up to the year of entry into force of the determined cost method

Table 2 - Unit rate calculation Charging zone name : GREECE Entity name : NSA Unit rate calculation 2010 2011 Period of reference : 2012-2014

2012

2013

2014

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

1. Determined costs in nominal terms and inflation adjustment Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. - Table 1 Actual inflation rate - Table 1 Forecast inflation rate - Table 1 Inflation adjustment (1) : year n amount to be carried over

12.562,0 4,7% 4,7%

11.063,0 3,1% 2,5%

12.613,2 1,0% 0,5% 132,0

12.672,8 0,7%

12.940,8 1,0%

35

2. Forecast and actual total service units 2.1 Forecast total service units (performance plan) 2.2 Actual total service units 2.3 Actual / forecast total service units (in %) 3. Costs subject to traffic risk sharing Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. (reported from Table 1) Inflation adjustment : amount carried over to year n Traffic : amounts carried over to year n Traffic risk sharing : add. revenue carried over to year n Traffic risk sharing : revenues losses carried over to year n Costs exempt from cost sharing : amounts carried over to year n Bonus or penalty for performance Over(-) or under(+) recoveries (2) : amounts carried over to year n Total for the calculation of year n unit rate

4.406,1 4.454,0

4.560,1 4.546,4

4.698,0 4.357,6 92,8%

4.860,0

5.041,0

3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9

3.10 Traffic risk sharing : add. rev. year n to be carried-over 3.11 Traffic risk sharing : revenue loss year n to be carried-over 3.12 Over/under recoveries from traffic variations n to be carried-over Parameters for traffic risk sharing 3.13 % additional revenue returned to users in year n+2 3.14 % loss of revenue borne by airspace users 4. Costs not subject to traffic risk sharing Determined costs in nominal terms - VFR excl. (Table 1) Inflation adjustment : amount carried over to year n Traffic : amounts carried over to year n Costs exempt from cost sharing : amounts carried over to year n Restructuring costs : amounts carried over to year n Over(-) or under(+) recoveries (2) : amounts carried over to year n

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6

12.562,0

11.063,0

12.613,2 0,0 0,0 0,0

12.672,8 0,0 0,0 0,0

12.940,8 131,98 913,99 0,0 0,0

0,0

0,0

36

4.7 Total for the calculation of year n unit rate 4.8 Over/under recoveries from traffic variations n to be carried-over 5. Other revenues - applied unit rate (in national currency) Total other revenues Total revenues from Public Authorities of which Union assistance programmes of which National public funding Commercial activities Other other revenues

12.562,0

11.063,0

12.613,2 -913,99

12.672,8

13.986,8

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6

5.7 Grand total for the calculation of year n unit rate 5.8 Year n unit rate (in national currency) 5.9 ANSP component of the unit rate 5.10 MET component of the unit rate 5.11 NSA-State component of the unit rate 5.12 Year n unit rate that would have applied without other revenues

12.562,0

11.063,0

12.613,2

12.672,8

13.986,8

2,85 2,85

2,43 2,43

2,68 2,68

2,61 2,61

2,77 2,77

Costs, revenues and other amounts in '000 Euro - Service units in '000 (1) Cumulated impact of yearly differences between actual and forecast inflation adjustment of the total determined costs (2) Over/under recoveries incurred up to the year of entry into force of the determined cost method

37

Table 3 - Complementary Information Charging zone name PART A : Complementary Information on costs 2010F GREECE 2011F 2012 2013 2014 2010 Period of reference : 2012-2014 2011 2012 2013 2014

Determined costs (performance plan) Eurocontrol costs 1.1 EUROCONTROL costs (Euro) 1.2 Exchange rate (if applicable) Cost of common projects 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Total costs of common projects Common project 1 Common project 2 Common project (by nature) 11.937,0 12.009,0 12.277,0 12.360,1

Actual costs 11.025,2 11.070,7

0,0

0,0

Costs exempted from the cost sharing arrangements - Article 14(2)(b) 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Staff Other operating costs Depreciation Cost of capital Exceptional items Total costs exempted from cost sharing

0,0 -866,3

-866,3 (by factor/item) 0,0 0,0

0,0

0,0

Costs exempted from the cost sharing arrangements - Article 14(2)(b) 3.7 Pension 3.8 Interest rates on loans

38

3.9 National taxation law 3.10 New cost item required by law 3.11 International agreements 3.12 Total costs exempted from cost sharing Restructuring costs, if authorised in accordance with Article 7(4) 4.1 Total restructuring costs Planned costs (business case) 0,0 0,0

0,0 0,0 -866,3 -866,3

0,0

0,0

Actual costs (for information) 0,0 After RP1 0,0

PART B : Complementary information on adjustments

Amounts

Total C/O

Before

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Inflation adjustment Year 2012 Inflation adjustment Year 2013 Inflation adjustment Year 2014 Total Inflation Adjustment

1.721,1

1.721,1

1.721,1

1.721,1 1.729,0

1.721,1 1.729,0

1.721,1 1.729,0

Traffic balance Year 2012 Traffic balance Year 2013 Traffic balance Year 2014 Total Traffic Adjustment

1.729,0

1.729,0

1.729,0

Traffic risk sharing revenue Year 2012 Traffic risk sharing revenue Year 2013 Traffic risk sharing revenue Year 2014 Total Traffic Risk sharing revenue adjustment

0,0

0,0 5.224,2 5.224,2 5.224,2

Traffic risk sharing loss Year 2012

39

Traffic risk sharing loss Year 2013 Traffic risk sharing loss Year 2014 Total Traffic Risk sharing loss adjustment Costs exempted from cost sharing Year 2012 Costs exempted from cost sharing Year 2013 Costs exempted from cost sharing Year 2014 Total costs exempted from cost sharing -866,3 5.224,2 -866,3 5.224,2 -866,3 0 0 -866,3 -866,3 0 -866,3

O-u recoveries before determined costs Year 2005 O-u recoveries before determined costs Year 2006 O-u recoveries before determined costs Year 2007 O-u recoveries before determined costs Year 2008 O-u recoveries before determined costs Year 2009 O-u recoveries before determined costs Year 2010 O-u recoveries before determined costs Year 2011 Total carry-overs

-24.786 -319 -1.109 2.179,0 -4.920,0 -1.593,0 1.031,0 -29.517,0

-9.914 2.179,0 - 4.920,0 - 1.593,0 1.031,0 -13.217,0

-4.957

-4.957

2.179,0 -4.920 0,0 -1.593,0 0,0 0,0 1.031,0 5.702,0 10.138,0 1.635,0 -1.054,0 0,0 0,0 0 0,0

40