Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The purpose of this document is to provide a checklist of some of the matters which merit consideration when a claim is brought against a solicitor (and does not include consideration of claims of fraud). It is not intended to be used to conduct the professional liability litigation but as a guide to some of the relevant points that the solicitors instructed to deal with a professional liability claim on your behalf will consider in relation to defence of a claim.
Does section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980 apply? This gives an extended period of limitation of three years from the date of requisite knowledge. Is there any argument that the solicitor owed a continuing duty of care to the client? (Carlton v Fulchers (1997 )).
QBE Professional practices QBE Professional update - Claims practices against update Solicitors - Risk Management/Jan - a checklist/Jan 2013 2013 2
Was the solicitor instructed to advise in relation to the whole transaction or on a specific part of it. What type of solicitors firm and department and individual within the firm is involved in the matter? If the solicitor or firm is held out as having particular specialist expertise in an area then they will be judged by the standard of a reasonably competent solicitor with experience in that field. (Hicks v Russell Jones & Walker) What is the nature of the client? Is it an individual seeking legal advise for the first time on a private matter such as a will, or is it in-house counsel at a corporate client giving a repeat instruction? An inexperienced client is entitled to expect the solicitor to take a broader view of the retainer (Carradine Properties v DJ Freeman) The solicitor will be expected to be competent in the field that is relevant to the particular matter (Hurlingham Estates v Wilde & Partners) The solicitor is not generally under a duty to advise on the wisdom of the transaction or to provide commercial advice (Pickersgill v Riley) There may be a duty to warn the client about particular issues the solicitor comes across during the retainer (Credit Lyonnais SA v Russell Jones & Walker)
Breach
Does the error amount to negligence? Not every error a solicitor makes is negligent. The usual position is that the solicitor is required to exercise reasonable care and skill (unless for example the solicitor has agreed contractually to a higher standard of care). For example, if a solicitor advises wrongly on the construction of a document the error will not necessarily be negligent if it is a reasonable construction. However, it may be negligent not to advise the client that the matter is open to interpretation. Did the solicitor take adequate instructions and was the solicitor following the clients instructions? If the solicitor did act on instructions that will usually be a defence unless the clients instructions were a result of inadequate legal advice. Was the solicitor relying on counsels advice? Solicitors are entitled to rely on the advice of counsel properly instructed. The solicitor must however, exercise his own independent judgment and reject counsels advice if it is obviously or glaringly wrong (Locke v Camberwell HA (2002) Ridehalgh v Horsefield ( 1994)). Does the claim involve allegations of breach of warranty of authority? Liability for breach is strict.
What is the correct date on which damages should be assessed? The general, although by no means inflexible rule is that damages are assessed at the date of breach. Loss of a chance issues must be considered where it is necessary to speculate what a third party would have done had the solicitor discharged their duties. For example, if it is alleged that the solicitor should have advised the claimant about the effects of entering into a contract, and it is found that if given proper advice the claimant would have tried to re-negotiate the contract, the courts will assess the value of the lost chance that the counterparty would have agreed to the amendments. Damages for breach of a fiduciary duty will be assessed on a different basis, as they are restitutionary.
Contributory negligence/contribution
Is there an argument of contributory negligence? This is not common in claims against solicitors, although with some exceptions such as claims by lenders against solicitors. The defence of contributory negligence is not available in a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. Can a claim for contribution pursuant to the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 be brought? Are other professionals responsible for the same loss, eg an accountant, surveyor, counsel or a previous or successive solicitor.
Mitigation
Has the claimant mitigated his loss? Generally speaking a claimant is not obliged to embark on uncertain or complicated and difficult litigation to mitigate his loss (Pilkington v Wood (1953)). However, there are exceptions. For example, a mortgage lender who alleges a solicitor has been negligent has been required to obtain possession of the property and enforce the security (Western Trust Savings Ltd v Clive Travers Co).
Limitation of liability
Is there a limitation of liability contained in the retainer agreement Note that there are limits on the extent to which solicitors can limit their liability and consider whether the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 or the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1994 might apply.
Measure of damages
SAAMCo applies to solicitors claims. A solicitor can only be held liable for loss which falls within the scope of his duty (In Haugesund v Depfa the solicitors firm was not held liable for all of the losses flowing from a transaction where the firm was only asked to advise on a specific question on the validity of the proposed swaps). What is the correct measure of damages? The basic rule is that the claimant should be put in the position he would have been in if the solicitor had discharged his duty.
Further advice should be taken before relying on the contents of this summary.
QBE European Operations and Clyde & Co LLP accepts no responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of material contained in this summary. No part of this summary may be used, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, reading or otherwise without the prior permission of QBE European Operations and Clyde & Co LLP. QBE European Operations and Clyde & Co LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. QBE European Operations and Clyde & Co LLP 2013.
Clyde & Co LLPs Professional Indemnity Team has kindly given us full permission to reproduce this document, information correct as at August 2012.
QBE European Operations Plantation Place 30 Fenchurch Street London EC3M 3BD tel +44 (0)20 7105 4000 www.QBEeurope.com
4179/Claims against Solicitors - a checklist/JAN2013 QBE European Operations is a trading name of QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited and QBE Underwriting Limited. QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited and QBE Underwriting Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. QBE Management Services (UK) Limited and QBE Underwriting Services (UK) Limited are both Appointed Representatives of QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited and QBE Underwriting Limited.