Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Consistent Collateral, Issuance & Performance Foundation in Alternative-A and Subprime production and underwriting OTS Regulated, Publicly Traded, Securitizing Across the Credit Spectrum
While all of the above items are important, the highlighted items represent those that in managements view merit increased focus given current conditions
Indymac Has Achieved Strong Financial Results While Management Focus Has Been Required For Major Structural Changes
De-Reited (1/00) EPS cut nearly in half to pay taxes Independence from Countrywide; paid $76MM in stock to achieve Converted to a Hybrid Thrift/Mortgage Bank (7/00) 19th largest mortgage lender (12/00) Reinstated cash dividend Introduces the Hybrid Thrift Model Assets exceed $10B $1B in capital Acquired Financial Freedom, the top reverse mortgage lender in the USA 2003 2005
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
Transformation from passive REIT to actively managed lender begins $2.5MM in earnings $120MM in capital 4 employees/no customers
Top 10 mortgage lender BBB- S&P & Fitch Corporate rating Freddie Mac Tier 1 Servicer rating Fannie Mae Superior Servicer rating $1B in revenue $20B in assets 9th largest thrift Over 7,000 employees (550 in India) Over 580,000 consumer customers 26 SoCal branches 13 regional mortgage centers Implement regional president structure
Loans receivable: Loans held for sale Loans held for investment Total loans receivable
2005 0.37% @ WA multiple of 3.54 ______ 2004 0.36% @ WA multiple of 3.54
6,024,184 8,223,201 14,247,385 1,094,490 556,262 131,644 80,847 8,817 788,172 2,660,232
Mortgage servicing rights Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock Interest receivable Goodwill and other intangible assets Foreclosed assets Other assets
$2.5B represents draws on the $3.5B committed credit facilities, with $600MM uncommitted financing
Our Production Volume Has Demonstrated Solid Growth, with a Consistent Emphasis on Alt-A, Sub-prime, and Specialty Products
$90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $
5.20
0.59 _ 0.44 _ 0.26 0.35 0.85 _ 0.71 _ 1.25 0.82 3.03 11.25 1.05 _ 1.17 0.09 0.96 4.18 0.61 _ 1.58 0.40 1.38 0.80 _ 2.13 0.93 1.86 5.10 1.94 1.15 2.94 0.89 3.60 3.65 2.79 1.86 1.71 3.33 2.28 1.09 1.45 4.47 3.74 6.57 2.22 1.12
61.80 47.22
6.48
12.74
19.22
27.32
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Q106 (annualized)
Industry rank 0
5 10 15 20 25 30
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Q106
National Presence of Regional Mortgage Centers Help Drive Production Growth and Market Share Expansion
Bellevue Denver Kansas City Chicago Existing Regional Mortgage Centers Proposed Mortgage Centers 2006 and 2007
Columbus Boston Sacramento Marlton Philadelphia SF East Bay Pasadena Ontario Irvine Phoenix Dallas
Rocky Mountains SouthWest New England Upper Midwest
Virginia
Columbia Atlanta
Tampa
Mortgage Professionals Group Top Sellers Broad Seller Base Allows Us to Manage Seller Performance Aggressively
MPG - Top Sellers by Loan Submissions 2005 (Excludes Bulk) Prime Months as % of 2005 IndyMac Seller Prime Volume 41 2.40% 78 1.03% 52 0.98% 106 0.90% 33 0.88% Subprime Months as IndyMac Seller 78 30 34 28 33 Delegated % of 2005 Months as % of 2005 Subprime Volume IndyMac Seller Delegated Volume 2.05% 52 11.89% 1.89% 44 6.71% 1.70% 79 3.36% 1.21% 17 3.29% 1.10% 14 3.23% 1 2 3 4 5
Seller Termination Reasons Fraud Pre-funding Quality Control (PFQC) audit finding suspected fraud Seller Monitoring Findings MARI, Dunn & Bradstreet and all public information sources Audit Response Investor or Repurchase Request Appraisal Misrepresentation
Sellers
QC audit on 5 of first 7 loans 10% random sampling audit on each delegated correspondent seller 100% review of loans from all watch listed sellers PPQC findings, due diligence rejects, investor repurchase demands Quarterly DQ reports: Compare actual vs. expected DQ% 150% ratio actual vs. expected triggers review
Underwriters
Monthly QC audit of 4 loans per underwriter
Quarterly performance reports: Loans with minimum 1-year seasoning WAVG DQ% Stratified by prime, sub-prime, doc type
Appraisal Strategy: Leverage Technology to Target Highest Risk with Highest Expertise
100% of loans run through CMS and review in accordance with risk score Approximately 20 - 25% of production reviewed by Licensed Staff Appraisers, however Risk assessment rules target 18% of Prime and 32% of Subprime production 58 fully licensed appraisers on staff nationwide, 22 years average experience Over 3,300 appraisers on exclusionary list Decision Summary 2005 - 65% Approved; 7% Conditioned; 28% Cut-value or Rejected
CMS Process AVM
VP4
Fast Forward
Employment, income and assets must be fully disclosed on the application. Based on the overall credit quality of the loan, certain income and/or asset documentation waivers may be provided and a verbal VOE and IRS 4506 will be required Documented Verified -1 year -1 year Not Stated Verified Silent NA NA NA Documented Verified Documented Verified Documented Verified Documented Verified Silent NA Documented Verified Documented Verified Documented Verified Silent Silent NA NA
Limited Stated
Full = 2 Yrs. W-2s, Pay-stubs, 1040s Primary Borrower Fico for Full/Alt, All borrowers for Stated 2-months reserves on most programs Collections & Chargeoffs: Aggregate to $5K do not need to be satisfied. For investment properties, up to $250 per account and $1,000 in aggregate
Subprime Full = W-2/Paystub or 24 month bank statements Limited = 12 month bank statements Full, Limited, Stated Doc Types Only Fico on Primary Borrower No reserves on most programs, except >$500K, Full > 95%, Stated >90%
11
IndyMac Leverages Proprietary e-MITS Technology to Provide Fast Credit and Riskbased Pricing Decisions to Customers
What is e-MITS? Electronic Mortgage Information and Transaction System (e-MITS) IndyMac Banks award winning proprietary automated loan decision and market-based pricing system Consistent credit decisioning Best execution model Features Independently pulls tri-merged credit report Performs automated screening of IndyMac underwriting guidelines Directly accesses DU and LP system Allows mortgage originators and consumers to receive an approval and a risk-based price within minutes Computes credit loss estimate, prepayment assumption, and servicing valuation Provides competitive rate surveys Provides alternate qualified product and pricing choices Several thousand automated underwriting and pricing rules Benefits Facilitates efficient pipeline management Faster loan closing resulting from upfront customized listing of documentation requirements Access available 24-hours a day, 7 days a week
12
Borrowers Continue to Leverage Payment Options, but Relative Performance Remains Strong
Option Arm Payment Patterns by Vintage
100.0% 90.0% 80.0%
Origination Quarter
Loans w ith Current Principal > Original Loans w ith Current Principal = Original** Loans w ith Current Principal < Original
All Years
2003 First-pays
2004 First-pays
2005 First-pays
3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 2002 2003 2004 2005
5/1 ARM Option ARM
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Pr e
20
20
20
20
20
20
13
New Hybrid Option ARM Products Enhance Loan Features and Transparency to the Borrower
Product Index
12-MAT Pay Option 1 & 5 year 12-MAT
Min PMT
P&I from teaser Discount off FIR
Neg-am Cap*
110 110
PMT @ Cap
FIR, full-am <10yr FIRIO >10yr FIRP&I <10yr FIRIO >10yr FIRP&I
Recast
5 years 1st at 10 years 15, 20, 25 after 1st at 10 years 15, 20, 25 after
PMT @ Recast
FIR-full P&I FIR-full P&I
Lifecap
9.95% 9.95%
FlexPay 1 & 5 year 1-year Libor FlexPay Hybrid 3, 5, & 7 year Discount off FIR 110
FIR-full P&I
Note: Fully-indexed rate (FIR), Full P&I Payment multiplied by above factor
14
FlexPay Offers Payment Flexibility of Original Option ARM, With More Borrower-Friendly Payment Shock Expectations
FlexPay 7/1 vs Option ARM vs 7/1 Fully Amt Assuming Minimum Payment Only M in im u m P a y m e n t
$2,800.00 $2,300.00 $1,800.00 $1,300.00 $800.00 Option ARM 1 $999.76 2 $1,074.74 $1,920.93 3 4 5 6 7 $2,374.96 $1,920.93 $1,887.94 Option ARM 7/1 Full Amt FlexPay 7/1
Assuming Minimum Pmt Only Both Option ARM & FlexPay reach 110% cap at approx. month 60 FlexPays new required minimum pmt set at IO versus full P&I
$1,155.34 $1,241.99 $2,374.96 $2,374.96 $1,920.93 $1,920.93 $1,920.93 $1,920.93 $1,182.47 $1,182.47 $1,887.94 $1,887.94
Year
FlexPay 7/1 vs Option ARM vs 7/1 Int Only Assuming 6 Int Only Pmts per Year
M in im u m P a y m e n t
Mandatory 5-year recast waived on FlexPay, resulting in reduced potential for payment shock
Overall Assumptions Min. Option ARM pmt based on 1.25% 1-mo start rate, 7.5% annual pmt adj No change in 1-yr CMT rate of 4.98% FlexPay note rate of 6.875% No base rate change over time
FlexPay 7/1 $1,182.47 $1,182.47 $1,182.47 $1,182.47 $1,182.47 $1,182.47 $1,182.47 Year
15
Collections/Loss Mitigation
Loss Mitigation Workouts
Modifications (Completed)
Avg Totals
Workout Type*
Repayment Plans (Created) Modifications (Completed) Short-Payoffs/Deed-In Lieu (Completed) Avg Totals
2003
1,685 112 16 1,813
2004
1,861 123 17 2,001
2005
2,441 135 11 2,587
Q1'06
2,857 139 10 3,006
16
Collections/Loss Mitigation
Modification Success and Failure Rate
Current and Historical Modification Success and Failure Rates
90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40%
74.2%
69.8%
74.0%
84.5%
78.9%
30.3%
30.9% 24.2%
30.2%
26.0% 15.5%
21.1%
6.5%
0.8%
05
2.2%
05
1.1%
Ju n 05
3.2%
05
4.4%
2.3%
05
3.1%
05
0.9%
Nov 05
9.8%
D ec 05
M ar
05
Apr
M ay
Ju l
Au g
05
Sep
O ct
Modification Date
Percentage Successful *
Percentage Failure **
* Percentage Successful = Current, 30, 60, BK Current, FC Current, PIF, Srvc Rlse ** Percentage Failure = 90, 120, BK DQ, FC REO, PEN LIQ, C/O,LIQ
17
Collections/Loss Mitigation
Repay Plans Created March 2005 to March 2006
Repay Plans Created Mar 2005 through Mar 2006
4,000
# o f R e p a y P la n s
* FNMA defines 60% as the benchmark for a good success / failure ratio.
S u c c e s s R a te
18
Although Sub-prime 60+ DQ is Moderately Higher Than Peers, Cumulative Losses are Lower Due to Indymacs Strong Loss Mitigation Program
45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 2000 2001
NDE LB
2002
NC Option Average
2003
2004
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
60.00%
0.00% 2000
50.00%
2001
NDE LB
2002
NC Option Average
2003
2004
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
19
With Current Solid Business Foundation & Hybrid Thrift/ Mortgage Banking Model In Place, 5 Year Plan Projects EPS CAGR of 21% Through 2010
Over 3% market share Investment grade ratings 25 regional centers Added to S&P 500 Fortune 100 employer
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Eight in 08 Top 10 mortgage lender $1B in revenue $20B in assets 9th largest thrift Over 7,000 employees (550 in India) Over 580,000 consumer customers 26 SoCal branches 13 regional mortgage centers Implement regional president structure EPS Growth (CAGR) $8 EPS 8th largest lender
Top 6 mortgage lender $2.7B in revenue 2 million consumer customers Over $11 EPS 100 SoCal branches
1992-2005 27%
1999-05 32%
2005-2010 21%
20
Appendix
21
MOODYs
Sub-prime
SQ2- (1) SQ2 SQ1 SQ1 SQ2 SQ3+ SQ1 SQ2 SQ1
FITCH
Prime
RPS2+ RPS1 RPS1 RPS1 RPS2+ RPS1
S&P
Sub-prime
Above/Stable Strong/Stable Above/Positive Strong/Stable Strong/Stable Avg./Positive Strong/Stable Strong/Stable Strong/Stable
(1)
Moodys enhanced their rating methodology to include modifiers (+/-) to the rating categories. Had the modifiers been in place in 2004, the Indymac equivalent rating would have been SQ2-. The 2005 rating is an affirmation of the 2004 rating, considering the enhanced methodology.
22
57.37
56.78
Geographic Distribution
California Florida
23
24
23
32 4 5 6 9
34 4 4 6 8
34 4 3 7 6
20
19
24
27
29
21
30
28
32
44
44
46
Q1 06
2005
2004
Q1 06
2005
2004
23
Management Has a Strong Track Record of Growth and Returns Over Various Interest Rate Environments
Dollars in millions, except per share data 12/31/05 Net revenues Earnings EPS ROE Total assets Deposits Total equity # of shares outstanding (millions) Debt of equity ratio Market capitalization Loan production Market share Capitalized servicing portfolio Comparative Annualized Returns Indymac Dow Jones Industrial Average S&P 500 $1,106 $300 $4.54 22% $21,452 $7,672 $1,526 64 13.0:1 $2,505 $62,915 2.18% $84,495 12/31/99* $267 $68 $0.86 9% $4,025 $0 $828 75 3.9:1 $957 $6,980 0.45% $7,747 Year 2005 18% 2% 5% CAGR 6 years 27% 28% 32% 16% 32% Nm 11% -3% 22% 17% 44% 30% 49% 12/99-12/05 22% 1% -1% 12/31/92* $8 $5 $0.21 4% $714 $0 $119 14 5.0:1 $75 $0 0% $0 CAGR inception to date 46% 37% 27% 14% 30% Nm 22% 12% 8% 31% Nm Nm Nm 12/92-12/05 23% 12% 10%
* 1999 marked the beginning of Indymacs transition to a depository institution and taxable entity (earnings and EPS in 1999 are presented pro forma fully-taxed). 12/31/92 marked inception of Indymacs transition from a passive REIT to an operating mortgage banker with current senior management
24
Trends Show Credit Quality Of Production Relatively Stable Year Q2 05 Q3 05 Q4 05 Q1 06 Q1 05 % of Production Over Year Agency Equivalent <=45bps 66% 68% 66% 63% 58%
S&P Evaluated Quarterly Production (2) Loan Characteristics 3/31/2005 3/31/2006 $ in millions Evaluated Production $ 9,835 $ 16,282 Avg. Loan Size (actual) $ 261,302 $ 290,466 S&P Lifetime Loss 0.47% 0.51% LTV 73% 74% CLTV 78% 80% FICO 700 697 Product Fixed Option ARMs Hybrid/ARM Hybrid ARM I/O Total Doc Type Full Doc Occupancy Type Primary Home Second Home Investment Total Geographic No. California So. California Other Total 25% 35% 11% 29% 100% 32% 89% 3% 8% 100% 14% 28% 58% 100% 32% 34% 7% 27% 100% 20% 88% 3% 9% 100% 15% 28% 57% 100%
Alt-A Equivalent 45-80 bps Subprime Equivalent >80bps Total S&P Loss Levels Agency Equivalent <=45bps Alt-A Equivalent 45-80 bps Subprime Equivalent >80bps Total 25% 9% 100% Q1 05 0.21% 0.58% 1.99% 0.47% 25% 7% 100% Q2 05 0.22% 0.58% 1.80% 0.42% 24% 10% 100% Q3 05 0.21% 0.58% 2.25% 0.50% 26% 11% 100% Q4 05 0.20% 0.59% 2.05% 0.51% 28% 14% 100% Q1 06 0.22% 0.59% 1.57% 0.51%
Indymac Total Production Reconciled To Loans Evaluated By S&P LEVELS Model Balance
($ in millions)
Total Q106 Production Less: Consumer Construction Closed End Seconds Held for Sale HELOCs Reverse Mortgages (1) Subdivision Construction Subtotal Total Production Evaluated By S&P LEVELS Model (2)
FICO CLTV NA NA 720 689 728 NA NA 712 697 76% 94% 79% 55% 74% 74% 80
16,282
(1) 95% of reverse mortgages are FHA insured (based on number of loans) (2) While Indymac production is evaluated using the S&P LEVELS model, this data is not audited or endorsed by S&P. S&P Evaluated Production excludes second liens, HELOC, reverse mortgages, and construction loans.
25
Business Unit Head may grant exceptions to these limits on a case-by-case basis non-prime allowed except in those instances where loans are submitted as prime and downgraded to non-prime following documentation review. In these cases, the loan will remain with the original underwriter 3Required in order to underwrite any IndyMac loans 4Required in order to underwrite Texas O/O Refinance loans 5Required in order to underwrite Co-op loans 6Required in order to underwrite non-prime loans 7Required in order to underwrite spec loans (training for this loan type is currently under development) 8Individual loans are subject to review per the Underwriter Second Review Policy
26
n/a
4,438
8,629
(*) When only 1 value is listed, parameters are the same for both.
NOTE: This is a consolidated representation of Indymacs guidelines and performance data for discussion purposes only please refer to the Lending Guide for complete guidelines.
27
253
2,105
3,631
15,533
(*) When only 1 value is listed, parameters are the same for both.
NOTE: This is a consolidated representation of Indymacs guidelines and performance data for discussion purposes only please refer to the Lending Guide for complete guidelines.
28
Nonprime Products
High Level Parameters Credit Level 1++
Min Credit Score Max Loan Amount Max LTV% Max CLTV% Max Cashout Max DTI %
93
87
1,175
2,867
(*) When only 1 value is listed, parameters are the same for both.
NOTE: This is a consolidated representation of Indymacs guidelines and performance data for discussion purposes only please refer to the Lending Guide for complete guidelines.
29
16.00%
14.00% 2000-A 2000-B 2000-C 2001-A 2001-C 2002-A 2002-B 2003-A 2004-A 2004-B 2004-C 2005-A 2005-B
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
1 3 5 7 9 13 21 11 15 17 19 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73
Month
30
Month #
31
Portfolio Overview
March 31, 2005
Direct Servicing of $55.0 billion 271,566 Loans Master Servicing Portfolio (directly serviced by others) of $630,784,570 on approximately 3,546 loans Alt-A = 60.76% Conforming Conventional = 26.59% Subprime = 10.71% Other = 1.94% Total = 100% California = 31.39% New York = 9.26% Florida = 7.31% New Jersey = 4.07% Virginia = 3.07% Other = 44.90%
Total = 100%
Total = 100%
32
Where to Find Indymacs Collateral and Performance Information Reports http://regab.indymacbank.com/main.aspx http://bondir.indymacbank.com Need Further Website Assistance? Contact One of Our Analysts at Scott McKey, Sr. Analyst Lead (626) 535-5251 - scott.mckey@indymacbank.com Monica Man, Analyst (626) 535-8514 - monica.man@indymacbank.com
33