Strategic Facilities Plan

Strategic Facilities Plan
STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN
Executive Summary
The Board of Education of Prairie Valley School Division No. 208 has identified a need for a long-range Strategic Facilities Plan that will meet the changing needs of students and communities within the school division over the next 10 to 15 years. The key factors driving the need for the plan include; a. changing demographics across the Division the population and enrolment is declining in some areas and increasing at a rapid rate in other areas; b. changing expectations regarding the type, quality and variety of educational programs and services offered to students and the related implications for facilities; c. the current condition of Prairie Valley School Division schools as measured by the Facility Condition Index and the need for strategic building updates and modernization; and d. the need to carefully manage the Divisions budget and make strategic capital spending decisions. An analysis of each Prairie Valley School Division school and related facilities is offered as it relates to: a. educational program; b. historical and projected enrolments, capacity and utilization; c. current capital projects energy upgrades; d. other current capital projects; and d. facility condition assessment. As a relatively new school division, with a complex inheritance of facilities, educational programs, and changing demographics, a strategic facilities plan vision and principles has been created that will allow the Division to plan for future facilities improvements and capital planning within a strategic framework. Strategic facilities planning principles can be used as criteria to develop and prioritize proposed capital projects. The Prairie Valley School Division currently has an average annual capital budget of approximately $10,000,000, with a varying amount of provincial grant funding to offset these expenses. This total includes both major and minor capital projects. The Division has undertaken facility condition assessments of all of its facilities, and it is estimated that it would take approximately $110,000,000 in 2009 dollars, to bring all schools up to todays standards as fully modernized facilities. This dollar amount excludes potential construction inflation costs, that could increase the total capital dollars required. This total dollar amount also excludes the need for new space at schools that are currently overcrowded, or are projected to be overcrowded in the future, requiring additional space. On the basis of current average annual capital expenditures of approximately $10,000,000, it is estimated that it would take approximately 20 years to bring all school facilities up to an equitable standard, including meeting the need for new space where enrolments are growing. Consequently, the timeframe is the plan is proposed as 20 years where each Division school would be scheduled to undergo a major comprehensive renovation, and renewal once, within a 20 year cycle. The proposed major modernization projects would include: a. comprehensive
hcs
E.1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY June 30, 2009
upgrading of mechanical and electrical systems; b. building envelope rejuvenation, including roofing, windows, doors; and c. major interior finish retrofit, including specialty program spaces. Within the 20 Year Facility Renewal Plan, 5 year grouping of projects have been identified for more specific capital planning, and a prioritized list of projects has been developed for years 1 to 5. The draft Strategic Facilities Plan was presented to the Public at four (4) Public Information Open Houses at various schools. The public was encouraged to comment upon the draft Strategic Facilities Plan and its vision, planning principles, and proposed facility renewal plan. Comments from the Public Information Open Houses are documented in the Strategic Facilities Plan (Appendix B: Public Information Open House: Handouts / Display Panels / Public Comments) and were taken into account in preparing the final Plan. The following is a summary of recommendations in the Strategic Facilities Plan. 1. That the Prairie Valley School Division adopt, by Board motion, recommendations from the Strategic Facilities Plan and amend Board Policy related to capital planning to include: The vision for the Board is a Strategic Facilities Plan with a 20 Year Facility Renewal Plan which will accommodate changing demographics and educational programming initiatives in fully modernized facilities in an equitable and financially sustainable framework. 2. That the Prairie Valley School Division adopt, by Board motion, recommendations from the Strategic Facilities Plan that amend Board Policy related to capital planning to include: The strategic facilities planning principles of the Board are: To maximize the potential to implement the Divisions Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) in the Strategic Facilities Plan;
For specialty educational programs and facilities, to maximize educational programming opportunity in an accessible location using regional or magnet concepts; To maximize the capability to accommodate existing and projected enrolments and educational programs in the facility; To carefully manage the Divisions capital expenditures and adequately fund ongoing maintenance, operational, and minor upgrading costs. 3. That the Prairie Valley School Division, direct the Director of Education to develop Administrative Procedures related to the amended Board Policy for future capital planning. 4. That the Prairie Valley School Division plan for the following prioritized major capital projects to compose the Five Year Major Projects Capital Plan and Years 1 to 5 of the
E.2

20 Year Facilities Renewal Plan for new construction in areas of rapidly growing enrolments: a. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a new Kindergarten to grade 8 / Middle Years Concept school in the White City / Emerald Park area, including the possible introduction of a French Immersion program in conjunction with the opening of the new school. b. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a Greenall High Replacement School, to a capacity of approximately 900 students. 5. That the Prairie Valley School Division plan for the following prioritized major capital projects to compose the Five Year Major Projects Capital Plan and Years 1 to 5 of the 20 Year Facilities Renewal Plan for major renovation and modernization projects: a. That Prairie Valley School Division complete its Energy Projects capital program over the next two and one half fiscal years. b. That Prairie Valley School Division continue the partially completed plan over the next five years for a major addition and major renovation to Balcarres School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing and adding to the entire school facility to a capacity of 475 to 500 students. c. That Prairie School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation and new gymnasium and peripheral areas to Lumsden Elementary School to address enrolment pressures and building condition. d. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation, and possible addition, to Kipling School, that will result in a unified Kindergarten to grade 12 facility, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing and possibly adding to the entire school facility to a capacity of 350 to 375 students. e. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation, and possible addition, to Vibank Regional School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing and adding to the entire school facility to a capacity of 275 to 325 students. f. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for major renovation to Whitewood School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing the school facility to a capacity of 225 to 250 students.
hcs
E.3

g. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for an addition and major renovation to Milestone School, that will result in a unified Kindergarten to grade 12 facility, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing and possibly adding to the school facility to a capacity of 200 to 225 students. h. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation to Grenfell High School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing the school facility to a capacity of 125 to 150 students. Using the vision, strategic facilities planning principles, and criteria, and the assessment of each of school facility, an overall 20 year timeline was created, with general 5 year groupings of projects. The recommended prioritization of capital renovations and modernizations for the remaining Prairie Valley School Division schools are organized into five year blocks, shown in the table below. The five year groupings for major modernizations are subject to annual review of enrolment projections, the facility condition index, and emergent Saskatchewan Ministry of Education capital funding.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN
Grade Configuration Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping

Grade Configuration
K to 8 K to 8 K to 12 7 to 12 K to 9 K to 12 PK to 8 K to 8 K to 8 K to 8 K to 8 8 to 12 PK to 7 PK to 6 K to 8 K to 3 9 to 12 K to 4 K to 8 K to 12 K to 8
School
New Construction New White City Area School Greenall Replacement High School Major Renovation Balcarres Community School Grenfell High School Kipling School (4 to 12) Milestone School (5 to 12) Vibank School Whitewood School Broadview School Dr. Isman Elementary School Edenwold School Grenfell Elementary School Lipton School Montmartre School North Valley Elementary School North Valley High School Pense School Wolseley High School
School
Balgonie Elementary School Clive Draycott School Cupar School Indian Head High School James Hamblin School Kelliher School Lumsden Elementary School McLean School Sedley School South Shore School Stewart Nicks School Bert Fox Community High School Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary C.S. Indian Head Elementary School Kennedy Langbank School Kipling School (K to 3) Lumsden High School Milestone School (K to 4) Pilot Butte School Robert Southey School White City School (existing)
Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20
PK to 8 9 to 12 PK to 12 7 to 12 4 to 12 5 to 12 K to 12 PK to 12 K to 12 K to 6 K to 6 PK to 6 K to 12 K to 12 K to 6 7 to 12 K to 8 7 to 12
1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10
E.4
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E.1
CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ........................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 DIVISION ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................3 Educational Program .............................................................................................................3 Historical Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization .....................................................................4 Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades.........................................................................5 Current Capital Projects Other............................................................................................6 Facility Condition Assessment ...............................................................................................7 CHAPTER 3 VISION AND STRATEGIC PLANNING PRINCIPLES.......................................11 DIVISIONS STRATEGIC PLAN CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN...............................11 STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN - VISION STATEMENT...........................................................11 STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLANNING PRINCIPLES .................................................................12 Alignment with Division Strategic Plan.................................................................................12 Maximize Educational Programming Opportunities .............................................................13 Accommodate Projected Enrolment and Educational Programs .........................................13 Carefully Manage Capital Expenditures and Ongoing Maintenance ...................................14 STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLANNING CRITERIA ......................................................................15 CHAPTER 4 DIVISION FACILITY RENEWAL PLAN.............................................................16 CHAPTER 5 PUBLIC CONSULTATION.................................................................................19 FORMAT AND PROCESS..........................................................................................................19 COMMENTS RECEIVED............................................................................................................19 Project Categorization..........................................................................................................19 Utilization Rates ...................................................................................................................21 Facility Condition..................................................................................................................21 Projected Enrolments / Housing Development ....................................................................21 CHAPTER 6 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................................23 FACILITIES PLANNING VISION STATEMENT BOARD POLICY...........................................23 CAPITAL PLANNING PRINCIPLES BOARD POLICY ............................................................23 20 YEAR RENEWAL PLAN ........................................................................................................24 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN.......................................................................................................25 Projected Cash Flow Analysis .............................................................................................26 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN PRIORITIES NEW CONSTRUCTION .......................................27 New Construction Priority 1 New White City / Emerald Park Area School .......................27 New Construction Priority 2 Greenall High Replacement School .....................................28 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN PRIORITIES MAJOR RENOVATION AND MODERNIZATION 29 Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 1 Complete Energy Upgrade Projects ......29
hcs
Table of Contents
Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 2 Complete Balcarres Modernization........30 Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 3 Kipling Modernization.............................31 Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 4 Vibank Modernization ............................33 Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 5 Whitewood Modernization......................34 Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 6 Milestone Modernization ........................35 Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 7 Grenfell High Modernization ..................36 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................38 APPENDIX A SCHOOL FACILITIES TECHNICAL APPENDIX (SEPARATE DOCUMENT)1 APPENDIX B PUBLIC INFORMATION OPEN HOUSE HANDOUTS / DISPLAY PANELS / PUBLIC COMMENTS (SEPARATE DOCUMENT)...............................................................2 APPENDIX C HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED ENROLMENTS, BY SCHOOL, BY GRADE, AND BY YEAR (SEPARATE DOCUMENT) .........................................................................3
ii
Chapter 1 Background and Purpose
Prairie Valley School Division No. 208 is composed of 38 schools in 32 communities. The Divisions schools can be found from Regina Beach and Bethune to the west, Kelliher and Lipton to the north, Milestone, Sedley and Montmartre to the south and Whitewood and Kennedy Langbank to the east. The school division serves over 8,100 students from prekindergarten through grade 12. The Division has two Hutterite colony schools that are not part of this Strategic Facilities Plan. The Division was created by Ministerial Order on January 1, 2006, as a result of provincial restructuring of school divisions.
KELLIHER
SOUTHEY
CUPAR
LIPTON BALCARRES
REGINA BEACH
FORT QUAPPELLE LEMBERG NEUDORF
BETHUNE LUMSDEN
EDENWOLD QUAPPELLE PILOT BUTTE MCLEAN PENSE GRAND COULEE WHITE CITY VIBANK MONTMARTRE SEDLEY KIPLING MILESTONE KENNEDY LANGBANK WOLSELEY GRENFELL BROADVIEW WHITEWOOD INDIAN HEAD
hcs

Chapter 1 Background and Purpose June 30, 2009
The Board of Education of Prairie Valley School Division No. 208 has identified a need for a long-range Strategic Facilities Plan that will meet the changing needs of students and communities within the school division over the next 10 to 15 years. The key factors driving the need for the plan include; o o o o changing demographics across the Division the population and enrolment is declining in some areas and increasing at a rapid rate in other areas; changing expectations regarding the type, quality and variety of educational programs and services offered to students and the related implications for facilities; the current condition of Prairie Valley School Division schools as measured by the Facility Condition Index and the need for strategic building updates and modernization; the need to carefully manage the Divisions budget and make strategic capital spending decisions.

Chapter 2 Division Assessment June 30, 2009
Chapter 2 Division Assessment
The Prairie Valley School Division faces a number of challenges, and opportunities, as it relates to: educational program; historical and projected enrolments, capacity and utilization; current capital projects energy upgrades; current capital projects other; and facility condition assessment.
Educational Program Prairie Valley School Division runs a variety of education programs within its Pre-Kindergarten to grade 12 school model. There are a variety of grade configurations in schools in various communities. The Division has received a draft Program and Services Study Report, by the Saskatchewan Educational Leadership Unit of the University of Saskatchewan. The draft Report has identified that: few schools in Prairie Valley School Division were taking advantage of Technology Supported Learning or Distance Education delivery mechanisms. This strategy has the potential to increase the program opportunities for all students in Prairie Valley School Division. It was noted that few schools have adequate dedicated facilities and equipment to enable greater utilization of Technology Support Learning or Distance Education delivery mechanisms. There was a great variability in the adequacy of programs in the practical and applied arts (PAA). The larger schools tended to have a number of programs whereas the smaller schools either did not have programs or limited programs. This was an area that students and parents wanted better programs and services in the future. Parents were especially concerned that there is a demand for trades and technology people and schools are not preparing students adequately for the world of work.
It was noted that the Division has commenced a Practical and Applied Arts (PAA) review, which could assist in providing future educational programming direction for focusing the renewal of PAA specialty spaces in school facilities.
hcs

With regard to Practical and Applied Arts (PAA), and associated facilities, some schools have shops and home economic labs, and some do not. In some cases, there is an arrangement between two schools to share facilities, but this relationship seems random, adhoc. There appears to be a lack of a consistent Division paradigm for the delivery of educational programs in some specialized spaces (e.g. Industrial Arts shops, home economics labs, etc.). Consequently, several schools have significantly underutilized specialty spaces. In turn, this is resulting in limited facilities operation and maintenance funding spread over too many facilities, with a lack of sufficient education program direction on where capital funding for facilities improvement should be focused in renewing school facilities that would be more fully utilized. Historical Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Prairie Valley School Division are shown in the chart below. The Divisions enrolment has decreased from 8,752 students in 2002 to 8,123 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller Kindergarten enrolments replacing larger graduating grade 12 enrolments. However, it is noteworthy that the Division enrolment decline has leveled off over the last three years. This is primarily due to a relatively large influx, and in-migration, of enrolment due to significant new housing over the past three years. The majority of this inmigration of students has occurred in Division schools immediately to the east of Regina.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION HISTORICAL HEADCOUNT ENROLMENT

Grade Configuration
PK to 12
School
Division Enrolment
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
8,752 8,614 8,476 8,287 8,094 8,159 8,123
General Instruction Utilization is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment divided by the general instruction classroom capacity of a school, and is designed to measure the extent to which the available space is used for classroom instruction, based upon Ministry of Education space standards. The General Instruction utilization number is an imperfect measure. In some respects the Ministry standards do not reflect 21st century teaching and support services delivery. However, the General Instruction percentages do provide a consistent measurement and tool for a relative comparison of all schools. Utilization over 100% does not necessarily mean additional classroom space is required.

Utilization Range 110% or higher 101% to 110% 90% to 100%
Utilization Title Exceed Guidelines Slightly Above Guidelines Meets Guidelines
Utilization Range 80% to 89% 60% to 79% 59% or Lower
Utilization Title Slightly Below Guidelines Below Guidelines Signficantly Below Guidelines
The Division has a significant range of utilization rates, ranging from a low of 45% to a high of 114%. Utilization rates are a key criteria used by the provincial government in evaluating capital plan submissions and ranking submissions for potential capital funding.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% General Instruction Utilization
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
General Instruction Utilization (Enrolment / Capacity)
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80% 80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45% 45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011.
hcs

Current Capital Projects Other The Prairie Valley School Division has a number of Ministry approved and currently active capital projects, excluding energy upgrade projects. These include: Balcarres Community School - Accessibility Lift (active). Balcarres Community School - Phase 3 Addition/Renovation (approved). Broadview School Roof Replacement, practical and applied arts area roof sections (approved). Greenall High School - Phase 1 Modernization (approved), 4 relocatable class rooms (active). Kipling School - Washroom Renovation (approved). Lumsden Elementary School - Roof Replacement (approved). Montmartre School Roof Replacement, High school, middle years, main entrance and associated corridor roof sections. Accessible washroom / shower / therapy room. Daycare, capital costs are the responsibility of the Daycare Board. (approved). Wolseley High School - Gymnasium Service Upgrades (approved). The School Division has also allocated funding for projects that may arise through the fiscal year due to health and safety issues, the need for additional accessible washrooms and the need for additional roof repairs. In addition, Prairie Valley School Division has submitted a number of major capital project requests for Ministry approval and capital funding, including: Priority 2 * (Critical Space Shortage) Lumsden Elementary School, gymnasium addition/renovation White City School, new elementary school Greenall High School, addition/renovation Priority 3 * (Structural Repair/Building Restoration) Cupar School, facility upgrade Vibank Regional School, restoration Bert Fox Community High School (Fort QuAppelle), facility upgrade Montmartre School, facility upgrade Kelliher School, facility upgrade Robert Southey School (Southey), facility upgrade Broadview School, facility upgrade Lumsden High School, facility upgrade James Hamblin School (QuAppelle), relocatables/mechanical upgrade In addition to the priority 2 and 3 projects, Prairie Valley School Division has submitted numerous minor capital upgrades and renovations to the Ministry for approval and subsequent funding.

* Note: The priority categories and labels referenced are assigned by the Ministy of Education, not by Prairie Valley School Division. Facility Condition Assessment A Facility Condition Assessment was done on all Prairie Valley School Division schools in 2007 and 2008. As part of this scope of work, a Facilities Condition Index (FCI) was created for each school. The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs focus on the building envelope, core electrical systems, and core mechanical systems and increase (worsen) as facilities and their systems age. FCIs do not measure the aesthetics or functionality of the building. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
Rating Range 0% to 5% Rating Title Good Definition New condition. Meets present and foreseeable future requirements. Good condition. Meets all present requirements. Has significant deficiencies, but meets minimum requirements. Systems nearing the end of their normal life-cycle. Does not meet requirements. Immediate attending required. Systems at end of their life-cycle. Parts no longer in stock, or very difficult to obtain. High risk of system failure.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 ratings for the Division range from 5% (Good) to 54% (Very Poor). A review of the data from the facility condition assessments indicates that the most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope: refers to roofing, gutters, downspouts, exterior walls, exterior doors and associated frames and hardware, exterior windows. Equipment & Furnishings: refers to theatre and stage equipment, laboratory equipment, residential equipment (e.g. stoves), fixed furnishings general equipment (e.g. millwork /
hcs

cabinets), science laboratories, servey / kitchen, practical and applied arts industrial lab, computer labes, administration, bliinds. Interiors: refers to fixed partitions, interior doors and associate frames and hardware, chalkboards, lockers, stairs and associated finishes, interior wall finishes, carpeting, other floor materials; ceiling finishes. Core Electrical Systems: refers to electrical service and distribution, main electrical switchboards, branch circuit panels boards, interior fluorescent fixtures, fire alarm system, general voice and date systems. Core Mechanical Systems: refers to heat generating systems, general hot water boilers, standard furnaces, distribution systems, terminal and package units, packaged rooftop air conditioning units, fan coil units, make-up air units, controls and instrumentation energy control, monitoring and management systems, dust collectors. Core Plumbing Systems: refers to plumbing fixtures, toilets, kitchen sinks, showers, drinking fountains and water coolers, water distribution, pipes, fittings, and filters, domestic water distribution, sanitary waste.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
Facility Condition Index Total Rating (2008)
Facility Condition Index Total Rating
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
A profile of each school, and related facilities, has been created for the Strategic Facilities Plan as it relates to:

educational program; historical and projected enrolments, capacity and utilization; current capital projects energy upgrades; other current capital projects; and facility condition assessment.
Each school was visited in the school division. The school visitations, and related planning analysis, included: Visiting Prairie Valley School Division schools and sites and updating floor plans and facility databases and reviewing facility condition assessment reports, as they relate to operational capacity and utilization; Interviewing Division and school-based administrators; Obtaining municipal development plans from municipalities; Interviewing Ministry of Education personnel; Meeting with municipal planning and development officials to review land use development plans; Principals were asked: o o o to provide local information on historical and projected enrolment trends; to provide local information on projected residential housing developments; which rooms are currently being used for educational programs, by program type and grade, and for community use; plans for future educational programs, by program type and grade, and for community use, and associated space requirements.
Obtaining Saskatchewan Vital Statistics information; Obtaining Federal census information; Reviewing historical enrolment trends; Creating 15 year enrolment projections by school, by year, by grade, by geographic area, using a cohort-survival enrolment projection methodology;
hcs

Reviewing and analyzing information from the Baragar system and creating 15 year enrolment projections by school, by year, by grade, in the Baragar system; Creating a capacity and utilization analysis by school, by year, by geographic area.
A profile of each school can be found in Appendix A (School Facilities Technical Appendix). The information gathered compiled and analysed in order to develop a list of recommended capital projects for the next five years, and groupings of recommended projects in years 5 to 10, 10 to 15, and 15 to 20 of the Plan.
10

Chapter 3 Vision and Strategic Planning Principles June 30, 2009
Chapter 3 Vision and Strategic Planning Principles
As a relatively new school division with a complex inheritance of facilities, educational programs, and changing demographics, a strategic facilities plan vision and principles will allow the Division to plan for future facilities improvements and capital planning within a strategic framework. The Division is fortunate to already have a Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) which enables the strategic facilities plan vision and principles to be created within the Divisions overall goals.
DIVISIONS STRATEGIC PLAN CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Prairie Valley School Division came into being on January 1, 2006. The Division developed a Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) 2006-2010, which is updated annually. The strategic planning process provided the Division with a set of shared values to embrace and rely upon as the building blocks for all activity. With those values in mind, the Board of Education identified four major goal areas to focus upon over the four year plan 2006 2010. The Divisions goals support the vision, mission and values and the foundation for providing quality education for each and every student who attends Prairie Valley School Division. The Divisions Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) goals are: Higher Literacy and Achievement; Equitable Opportunities; Smooth Transitions; and System Accountability and Governance.
STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN - VISION STATEMENT

The demographics of the Division have changed significantly over the past several years, with some schools increasing in enrolment and some schools decreasing in enrolment. This has resulted in some schools being overcrowded and some schools being underutilized. It is important that the Strategic Facilities Plan address these anomalies. The changing demographics are triggering a review of educational programming opportunities and how best to achieve equitable, high quality, sustainable educational objectives in a large, geographically diverse, school division. A considerable degree of discrepancy has been found in the condition of Prairie Valley School Divisions facilities, ranging from very poor to good. The capital costs to bring all these facilities up to a fully modernized standard has been quantified in this Plan. The capital costs are well
hcs
11

beyond the ability of the Division to finance all required facility improvements at once. On the basis of current annual capital expenditures, and with Ministry capital cost sharing, it is projected that all the Divisions facilities could be brought up to a fully modernized standard over 20 years. Based upon discussions with the Board and Administration, it is felt that the Vision Statement should capture the key words and values of: changing demographics; quality educational programming; equity; and financially sustainable facilities. The proposed wording for the Vision Statement is: The vision for the Strategic Facilities Plan is a 20 Year Facility Renewal Plan which will accommodate changing demographics and educational programming initiatives in fully modernized facilities in an equitable and financially sustainable framework.
STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLANNING PRINCIPLES

In a school division with a large volume of diverse capital upgrading requirements, strategic planning principles enable the Division to list, evaluate, and prioritize needs and potential projects in a systemic decision making framework. Four broad strategic facilities planning principles are suggested, including: compatibility with the Divisions Strategic Plan; maximize educational programming opportunities; accommodate projected enrolment and educational programs; and carefully manage capital expenditures and ongoing maintenance.
Each of these planning principles is discussed in detail below. Alignment with Division Strategic Plan It is essential that the Strategic Facilities Plan be consistent with, and supportive of, the Divisions Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) and its related goals of: High Literacy and Achievement. Equitable Opportunities. Smooth Transitions. System Accountability and Governance.
The proposed wording for the related strategic facilities planning principle is:
12

Maximize the potential to implement the Divisions Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) in the Strategic Facilities Plan. Maximize Educational Programming Opportunities Facilities are meant to respond to and facilitate educational program requirements. An important principle in a strategic facilities plan is whether existing facilities can accommodate current and proposed educational programming opportunities. Developing a strategic facilities planning principle that addresses enabling educational programming opportunities in facilities is key to a successful plan. Specific opportunities that should be considered include: Practical and Applied Arts: Coordinate the 20 Year facilities renewal strategy with the Divisions Practical and Applied Arts Review to maximize the utilization of specialized instructional spaces, and minimize their capital and operating costs. Regional or Magnet Concepts: Initiate regional or magnet concepts for educational programs and related facilities as part of the proposed modernization of facilities to provide maximum educational opportunities for students. Pre-Kindergarten and Day Care Implementation: Evaluate the opportunity to incorporate Pre-Kindergarten and day care initiatives into schools to recognize the importance of early learning. Distance Education / Technology Support Learning: Enable the opportunity to create or enhance adequate dedicated facilities and equipment to achieve greater utilization of Technology Supported Learning or Distance Education delivery mechanisms.
The proposed wording for the related strategic facilities planning principle is: For specialty educational programs and facilities, maximize educational programming opportunity in an accessible location using regional or magnet concepts. Accommodate Projected Enrolment and Educational Programs Several of the existing facilities were designed for either small enrolments and programs, or conversely, larger enrolment and educational programs. In some cases, the type and nature of educational programs has changed very significantly from the time the original facility was designed and constructed. Developing a strategic facilities planning principle that addresses projected enrolments and educational program requirements in facilities will enable a successful strategic facilities plan. It will permit the Division to:
hcs
13

Identify Enrolment Growth / Overcrowding: Identify additional space needs based upon enrolment growth and overcrowding and determine additional space requirements in terms of additions and / or new schools. Develop Division-Based Space Standards: Where required, develop Division-based space standards, capacity, and utilization rates to more accurately reflect Prairie Valley School Divisions educational programming, support service delivery structure, staffing, and space utilization. Formalize Decommissioning Guidelines and Procedures: Formalize a process and procedure to identify, and potentially decommission space, based upon: a. current programs; b. Division staffing; c. Ministry capacity and utilization formula; and d. Division-based space standards, capacity, and utilization. The proposed wording for the related strategic facilities planning principle is: Maximize the capability to accommodate existing and projected enrolment and educational programs in the facility. Carefully Manage Capital Expenditures and Ongoing Maintenance The Division must carefully manage its capital expenditures. The Division should also ensure that there is adequate funding for ongoing maintenance, operational, and minor upgrading costs, in order to ensure that the condition of the facilities do not deteriorate further, or compromise the ability to offer quality and equitable educational programs. A strategic facilities planning principle in this area will enable the Division to: Maximize Potential for Ministry Funding: Maximize the potential for Ministry of Education capital funding for new space and for major modernizations. Facility utilization rates are a key consideration in the Ministrys current prioritization process. Focus Division Capital Funding: Target Division capital funding on facilities in good condition, and / or with low utilization rates, to emergent essential health and safety issues. Limit the Divisions capital funding on modernizations or additions for specialty instructional spaces unless the project has adequate Ministry of Education capital funding which is currently at 59.3% of approved costs.
The proposed wording for the related strategic facilities planning principle is: Carefully manage the Divisions net capital expenditures and adequately fund ongoing maintenance, operational, and minor upgrading costs.
14

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLANNING CRITERIA

Strategic facilities planning principles can be used as criteria to develop and prioritize proposed capital projects. The proposed criteria to be used to create and prioritized proposed capital projects are: The degree to which the proposed capital project maximizes the potential to achieve the goals and outcomes in the Divisions Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) in the Strategic Facilities Plan. The degree to which the proposed capital project maximizes specialty educational programming opportunities for students, for specialty educational programs and facilities, in an accessible location using regional or magnet concepts. The degree to which the proposed capital project maximizes the capability to accommodate existing and projected enrolments and educational programs in the facility. The degree to which the proposed capital project enables the careful management of the Divisions capital expenditures and adequately funds ongoing maintenance, operational, and minor upgrading costs.
hcs
15

Chapter 4 Division Facility Renewal Plan June 30, 2009
Chapter 4 Division Facility Renewal Plan
The Prairie Valley School Division currently has an average annual capital budget of approximately $10,000,000, with a varying amount of provincial grant funding to offset these expenses. This total includes both major and minor capital projects. It is felt that this capital funding amount should be used as the starting point for developing a Strategic Facilities Plan that meets the Divisions Vision and strategic facilities planning principles. The Division has undertaken facility condition assessments of all of its facilities, and it is estimated that it would take approximately $110,000,000 in 2009 dollars, to bring all schools up to todays standards as fully modernized facilities. This dollar amount excludes potential construction inflation costs, that could increase the total capital dollars required. This total dollar amount also excludes the need for new space at schools that are currently overcrowded, or are projected to be overcrowded in the future requiring additional space. This dollar amount also excludes funding for ongoing minor capital projects. On the basis of current average annual capital expenditures of approximately $10,000,000, it is estimated that it would take approximately 20 years to bring all school facilities up to an equitable standard, including meeting the need for new space where enrolments are growing. It is also noted that the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) standards for the life expectancy of systems, and the median life-span of systems is generally in the 20 year range. Consequently, the time period for this plan is proposed to be 20 years where each Division school would be scheduled to undergo a major comprehensive renovation, and renewal, once in a 20 year cycle. The proposed major modernization projects would include: Comprehensive upgrading of mechanical and electrical systems. Building envelope rejuvenation, including roofing, windows, doors. Major interior finish retrofit, including specialty program spaces.
Given limited capital funding and the extend of facility needs throughout the Division, it suggested that a phased major modernization strategy be adopted. There are two primary reasons for this suggested approach to capital planning. It will enable: the continued habitation of the school facility during the major modernization project, whereby one section of a school facility can be turned over to a construction contractor, while the remainder of the school continues to be occupied by the student population. In
16

some cases, relocatable classrooms may need to be temporarily located at the school site for the duration of the phased major modernization project with the relocatable classrooms being removed at the end of the capital project; and several major capital projects to proceed at a number of schools at the same time.
Within the 20 Year Facility Renewal Plan, 5 year grouping of projects can be identified for more specific capital planning. The strategic facilities planning criteria, which are list on page 15, provide an analytical framework within which individual projects can be considered and prioritized. To ensure a fair and comprehensive analysis of all schools, an assessment of each school facility was undertaken, as it relates to: educational program; historical and projected enrolments, capacity and utilization; energy upgrade capital projects; other current capital projects; and facility condition assessment.
Using the vision, strategic facilities planning principles, and criteria, and the assessment of each of school facility, an overall general 20 year timeline was created, with general 5 year groupings of projects.

Grade Configuration
School
School
hcs
17

The five year groupings for major modernizations are subject to annual review of enrolment projections, the facility condition index, and emergent Saskatchewan Ministry of Education capital funding.
18

Chapter 5 Public Consultation June 30, 2009
Chapter 5 Public Consultation
FORMAT AND PROCESS

A draft Strategic Facilities Plan was presented to the Public at four (4) Public Information Open Houses at various schools. The Public were encouraged to comment upon the draft Strategic Facilities Plan and its vision, planning principles, and proposed facility renewal plan. The Public Information Open House process included: Public notice (newspaper, school, community, etc.); Handouts at the Public Information Open Houses (background, purpose, Q&As, comment sheets).
Display panels included: Background / Purpose; Process / Schedule; Vision Statement; Planning Principles / Criteria; Demographics (historical, current, projected) using the Baragar system; Facility utilization; Age and condition of facilities, some of which came from FAME system; Comments panel.
Representatives from the Divisions Board and administration and the consulting firm attended all four (4) evening Public Information Open Houses and were available to answer questions from attendees. The handouts, comment sheets, display panels, and all public comments are located in Appendix B (Public Information Open House - Handouts / Display Panels / Public Comments).
COMMENTS RECEIVED
Project Categorization Comments: Some public comments indicated confusion on the categorization system of Priority 2 (Critical Space Shortage) and Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) on one of the Public Information Open House display panels.
hcs
19

Response: The Ministry of Education categorization system of Priority 2 (Critical Space Shortage) and Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) was not explained in enough detail on the Public Information Open House display panels. In summary, the Ministry of Education, facilities priority categorization system is: Priority 1: Health, Fire, Structural Safety, which includes: High levels of asbestos, radon, toxic or other dangerous fumes; Dead end corridors; Unprotected combustible construction; Failure of structural members.
Priority 2: Critical Space Shortages, which includes schools with a Weighted Utilization of over a value of 110%, by Ministry of Education space standards and number of students occupants per instructional space. Weighted Utilization rates program shortages at approximately 50% of the value of general instruction shortages then combines the two values to produce a single weighted utilization for the school. Priority 3: Structural Repair / Systems / Building Restoration, which includes renovations and repair to correct major structural problems or air quality issues which are not life threatening; replace boilers. Renovations to upgrade non-critical building code compliance issues. Priority 4: Building Restoration / Non-critical Space Shortage, which includes renovations to restore functions, durability and service life of various building components. Remedial Codes: Renovations required to bring building components up to present building and fire codes. Similar conditions as in Priority 2, except that other facility options are available such as after hours use, or bussing. Requests for new schools in growing subdivisions where bussing is still an option. Requests for consolidation of existing facilities where both buildings are still structurally viable and sound.
Joint-Use Facilities:
Suburban Schools:
Consolidation:
It is important to understand that the placement of requested capital projects into their categories (priority 1, 2, 3 or 4), and their ranking within the category, is done by the Ministry of Education, not school divisions.
20

Utilization Rates Comments: Some public comments indicated that the perception of the Ministry of Education General Utilization formula, as represented on the Public Information Open House display panels, did not accurately represent actual usage of space in a school. Response: The allowance space for general instruction space is defined in the Ministry of Education School Facilities Funding Guidelines. In general, the per student space allowances do not reflect the staffing allocations, and class sizes, that are currently being used by Saskatchewan school divisions. Facility Condition Comments: Some public comments expressed concern at the current state of facility conditions and why the facilities havent been improved. Response: Prior to amalgamation, there was limited local or provincial capital funding available for major facilities improvements. The Prairie Valley School Division Board has prioritized facility renewal in its strategic and budget planning processes, and within the past two years there has been a significant increase in Saskatchewan government capital funding for school facilities. Projected Enrolments / Housing Development Comments: Some public comments indicated that some members of the public did not feel that the enrolment projections were high enough, particularly in the areas of existing or proposed new housing developments. Response: The enrolment projections were developed by: Obtaining municipal development plans from municipalities and meeting with municipal officials to review land use development plans; Obtaining information from land use development interests; Visiting Prairie Valley School Division schools and sites and updating floor plans and facility databases as they relate to operational capacity and utilization; Interviewing Division and school-based administrators;
hcs
21

Obtaining Saskatchewan Vital Statistics birth information and population and enrolment information within the Baragar demographic projection software system; Reviewing historical enrolment trends; Creating 15 year enrolment projections by school, by year, and by grade, using a enrolment projection methodology, taking into consideration the above information sources. It is noted that there have been major changes to the land use development market in North America, Canada, and Saskatchewan since May 2008. Some more recent information reported from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) reported that: the Regina Census Metropolitan Area Region had 864 single family housing starts in 2007 and 979 single family housing starts in 2008. In its First Quarter 2009 Housing Market Outlook, CMHC is forecasting a 23.4% decline in single family housing starts in the Regina region to 750 single family housing starts in 2009. The Regina Census Metropolitan Area Region includes the City of Regina and the immediate surrounding urban and rural municipalities of: Lumsden, Pense, Grand Coulee, Sherwood, Edenwold, Pilot Butte, White City, and Balgonie. on February 9, 2009, there were 25 single family housing starts in the Regina region in January 2009, down by 58% from the 60 units started in January 2008. There were no multi-family units started in the Regina region in January 2009, compared to 15 units started in January 2008. on April 8, 2009, new housing starts were down 63 per cent, year-over-year, in the Regina census metropolitan area (CMA) in March 2009. There were 47 housing starts during March, compared with 127 starts in the same month in 2008. in the first three months of 2009, housing starts declined 56.5 per cent over the same period last year, from 285 to 124.
22

Chapter 6 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS June 30, 2009
Chapter 6 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The key factors driving the need for the Strategic Facilities Plan include; o o o o changing demographics across the Division the population and enrolment is declining in some areas and increasing at a rapid rate in other areas; changing expectations regarding the type, quality and variety of educational programs and services offered to students and the related implications for facilities; the current condition of Prairie Valley School Division schools as measured by the Facility Condition Index and the need for strategic building updates and modernization; the need to carefully manage the Divisions budget and make strategic capital spending decisions.
FACILITIES PLANNING VISION STATEMENT BOARD POLICY

The formalized adoption of a vision statement, by amendment to Board Policy, will enable the Division and the Board to work within a common vision for the planning of facilities and capital planning for the future. Based upon discussions with the Board and Administration, it is felt that the Vision Statement should capture the key words and values of: changing demographics; quality educational programming; equity; and financially sustainable facilities. That the Prairie Valley School Division adopt, by Board motion, recommendations from the Strategic Facilities Plan that amend Board Policy related to capital planning to include: The vision for the Board is a Strategic Facilities Plan with a 20 Year Facility Renewal Plan which will accommodate changing demographics and educational programming initiatives in fully modernized facilities in an equitable and financially sustainable framework.
CAPITAL PLANNING PRINCIPLES BOARD POLICY

The formalized adoption of strategic facilities planning principles, by amendment to Board Policy, will enable the Division and the Board to identify, evaluate, and prioritize needs and potential projects in a systemic decision making framework. That the Prairie Valley School Division adopt, by Board motion, recommendations from the Strategic Facilities Plan that amend Board Policy related to capital planning to include: The strategic facilities planning principles of the Board are:
hcs
23

To maximize the potential to implement the Divisions Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) in the Strategic Facilities Plan; For specialty educational programs and facilities, to maximize educational programming opportunity in an accessible location using regional or magnet concepts; To maximize the capability to accommodate existing and projected enrolments and educational programs in the facility; To carefully manage the Divisions capital expenditures and adequately fund ongoing maintenance, operational, and minor upgrading costs.
20 YEAR RENEWAL PLAN

The time period is proposed to be a 20 year plan where each Division school would be scheduled to undergo a major comprehensive renovation, and renewal, once in a 20 year cycle. The proposed major modernization projects would include: Comprehensive upgrading of mechanical and electrical systems. Building envelope rejuvenation, including roofing, windows, doors. Major interior finish retrofit, including specialty program spaces.
The 20 Year Renewal Plan associated recommendations are: That Prairie Valley School Division adopt the general principle of capital planning for major modernizations of all schools, by 5 year increments, within the 20 year renewal plan.
24

Using the vision, strategic facilities planning principles, and criteria, it is recommended that the Division use the following general 20 year timeline, and general 5 year grouping of projects.

Grade Configuration
PK to 12 9 to 12 7 to 12 4 to 12 5 to 12 PK to 8 K to 12 PK to 12 K to 12 K to 6 K to 6 PK to 6 K to 12 K to 12 K to 6 7 to 12 K to 8 7 to 12

Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10
School
Balcarres Community School Greenall Replacement High School Grenfell High School Kipling School (4 to 12) Milestone School (5 to 12) New White City Area School Vibank School Whitewood School Broadview School Dr. Isman Elementary School Edenwold School Grenfell Elementary School Lipton School Montmartre School North Valley Elementary School North Valley High School Pense School Wolseley High School
School
Grade Configuration
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

The Prairie Valley School Division currently has an average annual capital budget of approximately $10,000,000, with a varying amount of provincial grant funding to offset these expenses. This total includes both major and minor capital projects. It is felt that this capital funding amount should be used to define a number of prioritized capital projects that would be initiated over the next five years within an overall maximum capital funding amount of $50,000,000 for: a. minor capital projects; b. major renovation and modernization projects; and c. energy upgrade capital projects. It is felt that New Construction major capital projects are unique provincial capital projects and should be funded separately.
hcs
25

The following is a projected capital cash flow analysis and a list of prioritized projects. Projected Cash Flow Analysis The following is a chart showing the projected cash flow over the next six years of the proposed Five Year Capital Plan.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL YEARS 1 TO 5 PROJECTS SUMMARY
Grade Configuration
PK to 8 9 to 12 PK to 12
School
New Construction New White City School Total Greenall High Replacement Total New Construction Total
Year 1
$20,000 $20,000 $40,000
Year 2
$1,050,000 $2,000,000 $3,050,000
Year 3
$1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000
Year 4
$13,000,000 $22,748,000 $35,748,000
Year 5
$13,000,000 $22,748,000 $35,748,000
Year 6
$0 $3,000,000 $3,000,000
Total
$28,070,000 $52,516,000 $80,586,000
Major Renovation / Modernization Energy Upgrade Total Balcarres School Total Kipling School Total Vibank School Total Whitewood School Total Milestone School Total Grenfell High School Total Major Renovation / Modernization Total Years 1 to 5 Projects Total PK to 12 PK to 12 K to 12 K to 12 K to 12 K to 12 7 to 12 PK to 12 PK to 12 $4,900,000 $1,072,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,972,000 $6,012,000 $4,900,000 $1,072,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $6,052,000 $9,102,000 $700,000 $0 $1,220,000 $1,143,000 $1,840,000 $1,033,000 $20,000 $5,956,000 $8,956,000 $0 $0 $1,220,000 $1,143,000 $1,840,000 $1,033,000 $1,025,000 $6,261,000 $42,009,000 $0 $0 $1,220,000 $1,143,000 $1,840,000 $1,033,000 $1,025,000 $6,261,000 $42,009,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,025,000 $1,025,000 $10,500,000 $2,144,000 $3,680,000 $3,449,000 $5,540,000 $3,119,000 $3,095,000 $31,527,000
$4,025,000 $112,113,000
Note: 2009 Construction Dollars estimate.
26

FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN PRIORITIES NEW CONSTRUCTION

The Division facing significant residential and enrolment growth in the White City and Balgonie areas. The Strategic Facilities Plan has identified the requirement for new space in order to accommodate the enrolment growth. Two specific New Construction major capital projects have been identified in the Five Year Capital Plan. The two projects are: a. New White City / Emerald Park Area Elementary / Middle Years Concept School; and b. Greenall High Replacement High School. Each project is discussed in more detail below. New Construction Priority 1 New White City / Emerald Park Area School White City School has: a. a band room; b. a computer lab. The school has lost other specialty program spaces (e.g. Industrial Arts, Home Economics) in recent years due to enrolment growth, the lack of space for general instruction purposes, and the need to convert specialty program spaces to general instruction classrooms to accommodate increased enrolment. The general instruction utilization rate at White City is Medium High at 103%, relative to other schools in the Division. The enrolment at White City has increased from 426 students in 2003 to 539 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to increase over the next 15 years due to a continued demand for new housing in the area. It is also noted that Prairie Valley School Division currently busses 100 to 125 students to Regina schools with French Immersion programs, many of which come from the White City / Emerald Park / Pilot Butte / Balgonie / Edenwold areas. It is recommended: That Prairie Valley School Division continue to plan over the next five years for a new school in the White City / Emerald Park area, including the possible introduction of a French Immersion program in conjunction with the opening of the new school.
The projected cash flow for the new White City / Emerald Park Area School capital project is shown in the chart below.
hcs
27

PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS NEW WHITE CITY AREA SCHOOL
Grade Configuration
PK to 8 PK to 8 PK to 8 PK to 8 PK to 8 PK to 8 PK to 8 PK to 8 Yes
School
New White City School Min of Ed Funding Request Planning Sudy Site Acquisition Design Construction - Year 1 Construction - Year 2 New White City School Total
Year 1
Year 2
$0 $0 $20,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,020,000
Year 3
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Year 4
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000,000 $0 $13,000,000
Year 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000,000 $13,000,000
Year 6
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total
$0 $0 $20,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $13,000,000 $13,000,000 $28,020,000
New Construction Priority 2 Greenall High Replacement School Grenall High School has: a. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; b. a shop for Metalwork courses; c. a lab for Arts courses; d. a Band room; e. a lab for Home Economics courses; f. four labs for Science courses; g. three computer labs; h. a multi-purpose room that is used for physical education activities; i. a Bridges program. With a growing enrolment, the school is lacking in specialized spaces, including: a. practical and applied arts spaces; b. performing arts spaces; c. a second gymnasium; and other features of a larger high school, such as a cafeteria, social spaces, etc. The general instruction utilization rate at Greenall High is Medium High at 105%, relative to other schools in the Division. The enrolment at Greenall High has increased from 630 students in 2003 to 688 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to increase over the next 15 years due to a continued demand for new housing in the area. The facility condition index rating at Greenall High is Fair at 8%, relative to other schools in the Division. It is recommended: That Prairie Valley School Division continue to plan over the next five years for a Greenall High Replacement School, with a capacity of approximately 900 students.
28

The projected cash flow for the Greenall Replacement High School capital project is shown in the chart below.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS GREENALL REPLACEMENT HIGH SCHOOL
Grade Configuration
9 to 12 9 to 12 9 to 12 9 to 12 9 to 12 9 to 12 9 to 12 9 to 12 9 to 12
School
Greenall High School Min of Ed Funding Request Planning Sudy / Phasing Strategy Site Acquistion / Servicing Planning and Design Construction Construction Construction Greenall High School Total
Year 1
$0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Year 2
$0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Year 3
$0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Year 4
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,748,000 $0 $0 $22,748,000
Year 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,748,000 $0 $22,748,000
Year 6
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $3,000,000
Total
$0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $22,748,000 $22,748,000 $3,000,000 $52,496,000
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN PRIORITIES MAJOR RENOVATION AND MODERNIZATION

The Division has a number of school facilities that require major renovation and modernization, or are a continuation of existing modernization and energy upgrade projects. Seven specific major renovation and modernization capital projects have been identified in the Five Year Capital Plan. The seven projects are: a. Complete Energy Upgrade Projects; b. Complete Balcarres Modernization; c. Kipling Modernization; d. Vibank Modernization; e. Whitewood Modernization; f. Milestone Modernization; and g. Grenfell High Modernization. Each project is discussed in more detail below. Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 1 Complete Energy Upgrade Projects The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. It is recommended:
hcs
29

That Prairie Valley School Division complete its Energy Projects capital program over the next two and one half fiscal years. The remaining projected cash flow for the Energy Projects capital program is shown in the chart below. As of August 31, 2009, approximately $13.2 million will have been spent on the energy upgrade program. The total program costs over seven years is $23.8 million.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS ENERGY UPGRADE PROJECTS
Grade Configuration
PK to 12 PK to 12 PK to 12 PK to 12 PK to 12
School
Energy Upgrade Projects Planning / Construction Planning / Construction Planning / Construction Energy Upgrade Total
Year 1
$0 $4,900,000 $0 $0 $4,900,000
Year 2
$0 $0 $4,900,000 $0 $4,900,000
Year 3
$0 $0 $0 $700,000 $700,000
Year 4
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Year 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Year 6
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total
$0 $4,900,000 $4,900,000 $700,000 $10,500,000
Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 2 Complete Balcarres Modernization Prairie Valley School Division is in the midst of a five phase capital program to comprehensively modernize Balcarres School. The Ministry of Education has approved capital funding for the Phase 3 addition and renovation of the school, which is part of a phased modernization of the entire school. Two phases remain to be completed. The Ministry of Education has also recently approved funding for an accessibility lift. It is recommended: That Prairie Valley School Division continue the partially completed plan over the next five years for a major addition and major renovation to Balcarres School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing and adding to the entire school facility to a capacity of 475 to 500 students.
The projected cash flow for the Balcarres School modernization capital project is shown in the chart below.
30

PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS BALCARRES SCHOOL
Grade Configuration
PK to 12 PK to 12 PK to 12 PK to 12 PK to 12 PK to 12
School
Balcarres School Min of Ed Funding Request Planning Sudy / Phasing Strategy Phase 4 Planning / Construction Phase 5 Planning / Construction Balcarres School Total
Year 1
$0 $0 $0 $1,072,000 $0 $1,072,000
Year 2
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,072,000 $1,072,000
Year 3
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Year 4
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Year 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Year 6
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total
$0 $0 $0 $1,072,000 $1,072,000 $2,144,000
Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 3 Kipling Modernization Kipling is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school. The school is composed of two buildings with a municipal road in between the two. The Kipling Junior School building houses Kindergarten to grade 3. The building has: a. a small computer room; b. a library / music room; c. a resource room. There is no gymnasium with the building. Students use the gymnasium at the Senior School building. Kipling Senior School building accommodates grades 4 to 12 and has: a. a woodshop for Industrial Arts courses; b. a metalwork shop for Industrial Arts courses; c. a lab for Home Economics courses; d. two labs for Science courses; e. two computer labs; and f. a band room. It was noted that there is some duplication of resources and facilities by having two separate facilities. It was also noted that there are some traffic safety issues related to having the municipal road in between the two buildings. The enrolment at Kipling has increased from 290 students in 2003 to 355 students in 2008, primarily due to school consolidations and grade configuration changes in the area. The enrolment is projected remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years. The general instruction utilization rate at Kipling K to 3 is Slightly Above Guidelines at 104%. The general instruction utilization rate at Kipling 4 to 12 is Slightly Below Guidelines at 80%. The facility condition index rating for the Kipling K to 3 building is Poor at 25%. The facility condition index rating at Kipling 4 to 12 building is Very Poor at 42%.
hcs
31

The most significant facility condition deficiencies in the Grades 4 to 12 building were in the areas of: a. Equipment & Furnishings; b. Interiors; c. Core Electrical Services; d. Core Mechanical Services. It is recommended: That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation, and potential addition, to Kipling School, that will result in a unified Kindergarten to grade 12 facility, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing, and potentially, adding to the entire school facility to a capacity of 350 to 375 students.
The projected cash flow for the Kipling School modernization capital project is shown in the chart below.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS KIPLING SCHOOL
Grade Configuration
K to 12 K to 12 K to 12 K to 12 K to 12 K to 12 K to 12 Yes
School
Kipling School Min of Ed Funding Request Planning Sudy / Phasing Strategy Phase 1 Planning / Construction Phase 2 Planning / Construction Phase 3 Planning / Construction Kipling School Total
Year 1
Year 2
$0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Year 3
$0 $0 $0 $1,220,000 $0 $0 $1,220,000
Year 4
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,220,000 $0 $1,220,000
Year 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,220,000 $1,220,000
Year 6
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total
$0 $0 $20,000 $1,220,000 $1,220,000 $1,220,000 $3,680,000
32

Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 4 Vibank Modernization Vibank Regional School has: a. library in two portables; b. a woodshop for Industrial Arts courses; c. a lab for Home Economics courses; d. a lab for Science courses; h. an Opportunity program room; i. two computer labs. The school has no band room nor an Art Room. The enrolment at Vibank has increased from 183 students in 2003 to 262 students in 2008, primarily due to school consolidation in the area. The enrolment is projected to increase to 305 and 315 students over the next 15 years. The general instruction utilization rate at Vibank Meets Guidelines at 100%. The facility condition index rating at Vibank is Poor at 28%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: a. Envelope; b. Interiors; c. Core Electrical Services; d. Core Mechanical Services. It is recommended: That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation, and possible addition, to Vibank Regional School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing, and possibly adding, to the entire school facility to a capacity of 275 to 325 students.
The projected cash flow for the Vibank Regional School modernization capital project is shown in the chart below.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS VIBANK REGIONAL SCHOOL
Grade Configuration
School
Vibank School Min of Ed Funding Request Planning Sudy / Phasing Strategy Phase 1 Planning / Construction Phase 2 Planning / Construction Phase 3 Planning / Construction Vibank School Total
Year 1
Year 2
$0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Year 3
$0 $0 $0 $1,143,000 $0 $0 $1,143,000
Year 4
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,143,000 $0 $1,143,000
Year 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,143,000 $1,143,000
Year 6
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total
$0 $0 $20,000 $1,143,000 $1,143,000 $1,143,000 $3,449,000
hcs
33

Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 5 Whitewood Modernization Whitewood is a Pre-Kindergarten to grade 12 school. Whitewood School has: a. a Pre-Kindergarten program; b. a band room; c. a weight room; d. a multi-purpose breakfast / Art room; e. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; f. a lab for Home Economics courses; g. two labs for Science courses; h. a community room; i. two computer labs. The enrolment at Whitewood has decreased from 253 students in 2003 to 241 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller Kindergarten enrolments replacing larger grade 12 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years. The general instruction utilization rate at Whitewood is Below Guidelines at 70%. The facility condition index rating at Whitewood is Very Poor at 40%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies in the Grades 4 to 12 building were in the areas of: a. Envelope; b. Equipment & Furnishings; c. Interiors; d. Core Electrical Services; e. Core Mechanical Services; and f. Core Plumbing Services. It is recommended: That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for major renovation to Whitewood School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing the school facility to a capacity of 225 to 250 students.
The projected cash flow for the Whitewood School major modernization capital project is shown in the chart below.
34

PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS WHITEWOOD SCHOOL
Grade Configuration
School
Whitewood School Min of Ed Funding Request Planning Sudy / Phasing Strategy Phase 1 Planning / Construction Phase 2 Planning / Construction Phase 3 Planning / Construction Whitewood School Total
Year 1
Year 2
$0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Year 3
$0 $0 $0 $1,840,000 $0 $0 $1,840,000
Year 4
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,840,000 $0 $1,840,000
Year 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,840,000 $1,840,000
Year 6
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total
$0 $0 $20,000 $1,840,000 $1,840,000 $1,840,000 $5,540,000
Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 6 Milestone Modernization Milestone is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school. There are two school facilities that form Milestone School. There is the Kindergarten to grade 4 building, and the separate grade 5 to 12 building. There is a municipal road in between the two buildings. The Milestone Kindergarten to grade 4 building has: a. a multi-purpose / physical activity room; b. a computer lab; c. a resource centre / library. The Milestone grades 5 to 12 building has: a. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; b. a lab for Home Economics courses; c. a lab for Science courses; d. two lunch rooms; e. a computer lab. The enrolment at Milestone has increased from 184 students in 2003 to 205 students in 2008, primarily due to school consolidation. The enrolment is projected to increase to between 205 and 225 students over the next 15 years due to a larger number of Kindergarten students replacing a smaller number of graduating grade 12 students, and some housing development in Milestone. The general instruction utilization rate at the Milestone K to 4 building is Below Guidelines at 75%. The general instruction utilization rate at Milestone 5 to 12 building is Significantly Below Guidelines at 55%. The facility condition index rating at the Milestone K to 4 building is Poor at 24%. The facility condition index rating at the Milestone 5 to 12 building is Very Poor at 54%.
hcs
35

The most significant facility condition deficiencies in the Grades 4 to 12 building were in the areas of: a. Equipment & Furnishings; b. Interiors; c. Core Electrical Services; and d. Core Mechanical Services. It is recommended: That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation, and possible addition, to Milestone School, that will result in a unified Kindergarten to grade 12 facility, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing, and possibly adding to, the school facility to a capacity of 200 to 225 students.
The projected cash flow for the Milestone School major modernization capital project is shown in the chart below.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS MILESTONE SCHOOL
Grade Configuration
School
Milestone School Min of Ed Funding Request Planning Sudy / Phasing Strategy Phase 1 Planning / Construction Phase 2 Planning / Construction Phase 3 Planning / Construction Milestone School Total
Year 1
Year 2
$0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Year 3
$0 $0 $0 $1,033,000 $0 $0 $1,033,000
Year 4
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,033,000 $0 $1,033,000
Year 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,033,000 $1,033,000
Year 6
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total
$0 $0 $20,000 $1,033,000 $1,033,000 $1,033,000 $3,119,000
Major Renovation and Modernization Priority 7 Grenfell High Modernization Grenfell High is a grades 7 to 12 school. Grenfell High School has: a. the Pathfinders program; b. an Opportunity program; c. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; d. a lab for Home Economics courses; e. a lab for Science courses; f. a student lounge; g. a computer lab; h. a band room. Students from Wolseley High School, when there is sufficient enrolment numbers, use the Industrial Arts shop and the Home Economics lab, because these spaces are not available at Wolseley High.
36

The enrolment at Grenfell High has decreased from 169 students in 2003 to 129 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller grade 7 enrolments replacing larger grade 12 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years. The general instruction utilization rate at Grenfell High is Below Guidelines at 60%. The facility condition index rating at Grenfell High is Very Poor at 46%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies in the Grades 4 to 12 building were in the areas of: a. Equipment & Furnishings; b. Envelope; c. Core Electrical Services; and d. Core Mechanical Services. It is recommended: That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation to Grenfell High School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing the school facility to a capacity of 125 to 150 students.
The projected cash flow for the Grenfell High School major modernization capital project is shown in the chart below.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTED CASH FLOW FOR YEARS 1 TO 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS GRENFELL HIGH SCHOOL
Grade Configuration
7 to 12 7 to 12 7 to 12 7 to 12 7 to 12 7 to 12 7 to 12 Yes Yes
School
Grenfell High School Min of Ed Funding Request Planning Sudy / Phasing Strategy Phase 1 Planning / Construction Phase 2 Planning / Construction Phase 3 Planning / Construction Grenfell High School Total
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
$0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Year 4
$0 $0 $0 $1,025,000 $0 $0 $1,025,000
Year 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,025,000 $0 $1,025,000
Year 6
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,025,000 $1,025,000
Total
$0 $0 $20,000 $1,025,000 $1,025,000 $1,025,000 $3,095,000
hcs
37

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The following is a summary of recommendations in the Strategic Facilities Plan. 1. That the Prairie Valley School Division adopt, by Board motion, recommendations from the Strategic Facilities Plan and amend Board Policy related to capital planning to include: The vision for the Board is a Strategic Facilities Plan with a 20 Year Facility Renewal Plan which will accommodate changing demographics and educational programming initiatives in fully modernized facilities in an equitable and financially sustainable framework. 2. That the Prairie Valley School Division adopt, by Board motion, recommendations from the Strategic Facilities Plan that amend Board Policy related to capital planning to include: The strategic facilities planning principles of the Board are: To maximize the potential to implement the Divisions Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) in the Strategic Facilities Plan;
For specialty educational programs and facilities, to maximize educational programming opportunity in an accessible location using regional or magnet concepts; To maximize the capability to accommodate existing and projected enrolments and educational programs in the facility; To carefully manage the Divisions capital expenditures and adequately fund ongoing maintenance, operational, and minor upgrading costs. 3. That the Prairie Valley School Division, direct the Director of Education to develop Administrative Procedures related to the amended Board Policy for future capital planning. 4. That the Prairie Valley School Division plan for the following prioritized major capital projects to compose the Five Year Major Projects Capital Plan and Years 1 to 5 of the 20 Year Facilities Renewal Plan for new construction in areas of rapidly growing enrolments: a. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a new Kindergarten to grade 8 / Middle Years Concept school in the White City / Emerald Park area, including the possible introduction of a French Immersion program in conjunction with the opening of the new school. b. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a Greenall High Replacement School, to a capacity of approximately 900 students.
38

5. That the Prairie Valley School Division plan for the following prioritized major capital projects to compose the Five Year Major Projects Capital Plan and Years 1 to 5 of the 20 Year Facilities Renewal Plan for major renovation and modernization projects:
a. That Prairie Valley School Division complete its Energy Projects capital program over the next two and one half fiscal years. b. That Prairie Valley School Division continue the partially completed plan over the next five years for a major addition and major renovation to Balcarres School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing and adding to the entire school facility to a capacity of 475 to 500 students. c. That Prairie School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation and new gymnasium and peripheral areas to Lumsden Elementary School to address enrolment pressures and building condition. d. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation, and possible addition, to Kipling School, that will result in a unified Kindergarten to grade 12 facility, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing and possibly adding to the entire school facility to a capacity of 350 to 375 students. e. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation, and possible addition, to Vibank Regional School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing and adding to the entire school facility to a capacity of 275 to 325 students. f. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for major renovation to Whitewood School, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing the school facility to a capacity of 225 to 250 students.
g. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major addition and major renovation to Milestone School, that will result in a unified Kindergarten to grade 12 facility, through a consecutive series of sequential phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing and possibly adding to the school facility to a capacity of 200 to 225 students. h. That Prairie Valley School Division plan over the next five years for a major renovation to Grenfell High School, through a consecutive series of sequential
hcs
39

phased capital projects within an overall educational program plan and master plan for modernizing the school facility to a capacity of 125 to 150 students. Using the vision, strategic facilities planning principles, and criteria, and the assessment of each of school facility, an overall general 20 year timeline was created, with general 5 year groupings of projects. The recommended prioritization of capital renovations and modernizations for the remaining Prairie Valley School Division schools are organized into five year blocks, shown in the table below.

Grade Configuration
School
School
The five year groupings for major modernizations are subject to annual review of enrolment projections, the facility condition index, and emergent Saskatchewan Ministry of Education capital funding.
40
Strategic Facilities Plan Appendix A: School Facilities Technical Appendix
STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN APPENDIX A: SCHOOL FACILITIES TECHNICAL APPENDIX
BALCARRES COMMUNITY SCHOOL
Educational Program Balcarres Community School is a Pre-Kindergarten to grade 12 school. Balcarres Community School has: a. a Pre-Kindergarten program; b. a community based nonprofit day care; c. the Pathfinder program; d. an Opportunity program; e. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; f. a lab for Home Economics courses; g. a lab for Science courses; h. a community room; i. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Balcarres are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Balcarres has decreased from 481 students in 2003 to 468 students in 2008, primarily due to fluctuations in First Nations enrolment at the school. The enrolment is projected to increase remain in the 450 to 475 enrolment range over the next 15 years.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED HEADCOUNT ENROLMENT

Grade Configuration 2003
PK to 12
School
Balcarres Community School
2004 513
2005 475
2006 470
2007 449
2008 468
2013 475
2018 485
2023 468
481

BALCARRES COMMUNITY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
The 2008 general instruction utilization for Balcarres, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Balcarres Meets Guidelines at 95%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Balcarres
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Balcarres are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION ENERGY UPGRADES PROJECT SCHEDULE AND SUMMARY
Completed Projected 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASOND
Balcarres Community School Balcarres Community School Balcarres Community School
HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room
Current Capital Projects Other The Ministry of Education has approved capital funding for the Phase 3 addition and renovation of the school, which is part of a phased modernization of the entire school. The Ministry of Education has also approved funding for an accessibility lift. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor

The 2008 rating for Balcarres, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Balcarres is Poor at 21%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Equipment and Furnishings; Interiors; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Balcarres
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School

BALGONIE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
BALGONIE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Educational Program Balgonie Elementary is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school. Balgonie Elementary School has: a. a multi-purpose commons lunch area; b. a multi-purpose arts / science room; c. a music / band room; d. a computer lab that is part of the Resource Centre (Library). Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Balgonie Elementary are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Balgonie Elementary has increased from 380 students in 2003 to 440 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to increase over the next 15 years due to a continued demand for new housing in the area.

Grade Configuration 2003 380
School
2004 376
2005 397
2006 376
2007 410
2008 440
2013 576
2018 684
2023 680
Balgonie Elementary School K to 8
The main areas of residential growth in the attendance area are: a. the Town of Balgonie; b. the Rural Municipality of Edenwold; and c. the Hamlet of St. Joseph.

The major new subdivision in the Town of Balgonie is the Westview subdivision is on the western edge of the community. The next phase of development of the subdivision is awaiting Town of Balgonie servicing approval.
The Town of Balgonie is currently undertaking long range planning for water supply, treatment and storage in order to enable further growth of the community. The Town of Balgonie has indicated that it is awaiting a report to show water quality in the various test holes that were drilled, potential supply from those areas, and how the Town might need to mix or adjust treatment from what the Town has today. The report is also looking at the long range need for water storage for fire safety and other considerations. On June 5, 2009, the Town of Balgonie received a conditional combined Canada / Saskatchewan infrastructure grant of $5,058,156 towards the construction Central Water Treatment System. The total project costs are estimated at $7,567,235, with the difference between the Canada / Saskatchewan infrastructure grant and the total project costs being provided by the Town of Balgonie and / or land developers. The Prairie Valley School Division will need to communicate with the Town of Balgonie and the land developers to ensure that an adequate number, size, and location of school sites are planned for as part of the land use development plans.

Saskatchewan Municipal Affairs Community Planning has also initiated discussions with municipalities in the area with the goal of developing a more coordinated approach to regional land use planning and servicing of the area. The results over the above studies and reports could result in a significant change in the potential for future residential growth in the Town of Balgonie and surrounding area which, in turn, could result in the need to review the 15 year enrolment projections, including the number of required schools to serve the area. General Instruction Utilization is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment divided by the general instruction classroom capacity of a school, and is designed to measure the extent to which the available space is used for classroom instruction, based upon Ministry of Education space standards. The General Instruction utilization number is an imperfect measure. In some respects the Ministry standards do not reflect 21st century teaching and support services delivery. However, the General Instruction percentages do provide a consistent measurement and tool for a relative comparison of all schools. Utilization over 100% does not necessarily mean additional classroom space is required.
Utilization Range 110% or higher 101% to 110% 90% to 100% Utilization Title Exceed Guidelines Slightly Above Guidelines Meets Guidelines Utilization Range 80% to 89% 60% to 79% 59% or Lower Utilization Title Slightly Below Guidelines Below Guidelines Signficantly Below Guidelines
The 2008 general instruction utilization for Balgonie Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Balgonie Elementary Meets Guidelines at 94%.

Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Balgonie Elementary
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80% 80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Balgonie Elementary are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Balgonie Elementary School Balgonie Elementary School Balgonie Elementary School
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has not submitted any proposals for major capital projects at this school at this time.

Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Balgonie Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Balgonie Elementary is Poor at 19%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of Core Mechanical Systems. The roof top heating units, and related control systems, have reached the end of their normal lifespan. Some gas fired furnaces run at low to mid efficiency and should be replaced.

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Balgonie Elementary
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
10

BERT FOX COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL June 30, 2009
BERT FOX COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL
Educational Program Bert Fox Community High School is a grades 8 to 12 school in the community of Fort QuAppelle. Bert Fox Community High School has: a. an Integrated Learning Centre Day Care; b. an Arts Room; c. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; d. a room for Native Studies; e. a lab for Home Economics courses; f. three labs for Science courses; g. two computer labs; h. a lunch / commons area. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Bert Fox Community High are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Bert Fox Community High has decreased from 430 students in 2003 to 320 students in 2008, primarily due to fluctuating First Nations enrolment at the school. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 260 to 270 students over the next 15 years.

Grade Configuration 2003 430
School
2004 383
2005 348
2006 325
2007 370
2008 320
2013 277
2018 249
2023 261
Bert Fox Community High School 8 to 12
11

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Bert Fox Community High, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Bert Fox Community High is Slightly Below Guidelines at 80%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Pilot Butte
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80% 80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45% 45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
12

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Bert Fox Community High are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Bert Fox Community High Bert Fox Community High
HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has submitted a proposal for major facility upgrade to the school. The proposed project is categorized as Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) in the Ministry of Education system of categorization of priorities. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
13

The 2008 rating for Bert Fox Community High, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Bert Fox Community High is Good at 5%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Bert Fox High
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
14

BROADVIEW SCHOOL June 30, 2009
BROADVIEW SCHOOL
Educational Program Broadview is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school. Broadview School has: a. a community play school; b. a breakfast room; c. an Opportunity program; d. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; e. a lab for Home Economics courses; f. a lab for Science courses; g. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Broadview are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Broadview has decreased from 218 students in 2003 to 133 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller Kindergarten enrolments replacing larger grade 12 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to increase to 145 to 150 students over the next 15 years, primarily due to an increasing Kindergarten enrolment.

K to 12
School
Broadview School
2004 161
2005 147
2006 137
2007 132
2008 133
2013 144
2018 150
2023 146
218
15

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Broadview, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Broadview is Significantly Below Guidelines at 45%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Broadview
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
16

Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Broadview are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Broadview School Broadview School Broadview School
Current Capital Projects Other The Ministry of Education has approved capital funding for a roof replacement, in the practical and applied arts area, at the school. The Division has submitted a proposal for major facility upgrades to Broadview School. The proposed project is categorized as Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) in the Ministry of Education of priority categorization. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
Rating Range 0% to 5% Rating Title Good Definition New condition. Meets present and foreseeable future requirements. Good condition. Meets all present requirements. Has significant deficiencies, but meets minimum requirements. Systems nearing the end of their normal life-cycle.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
17

30% and higher.
Very Poor
Does not meet requirements. Immediate attending required. Systems at end of their life-cycle. Parts no longer in stock, or very difficult to obtain. High risk of system failure.
The 2008 rating for Broadview, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Broadview is Poor at 22%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Broadview
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
18

CLIVE DRAYCOTT SCHOOL June 30, 2009
CLIVE DRAYCOTT SCHOOL
Educational Program Clive Draycott is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school in the community of Bethune. Clive Draycott School has: a. a computer lab; b. a community based preschool; c. a multi purpose science / band / lunch / art room. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Clive Draycott are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Clive Draycott has increased from 87 students in 2003 to 96 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years.

K to 8
School
Clive Draycott School
2004 81
2005 87
2006 89
2007 98
2008 96
2013 86
2018 84
2023 90
87
19

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Clive Draycott, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Clive Draycott is Below Guidelines at 66%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Clive Draycott
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its
20

school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Clive Draycott are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Clive Draycott School Clive Draycott School Clive Draycott School
Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has not submitted any proposals for major capital projects at this school at this time. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
21

The 2008 rating for Clive Draycott, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Clive Draycott is Poor at 28%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Interiors; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Clive Draycott
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
22

CUPAR SCHOOL June 30, 2009
CUPAR SCHOOL
Educational Program Cupar is a Pre-Kindergarten to grade 12 school. Cupar School has: a. a community pre-school program; b. a lunch room / lounge; c. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; d. a lab for Home Economics courses; e. a lab for Science courses; f. a computer lab. Grades 9 and 10 students from Lipton School use the Industrial Arts shop and the Home Economics lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Cupar are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Cupar has decreased from 203 students in 2003 to 202 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years.
K to 12
School
Cupar School
2004 197
2005 197
2006 188
2007 190
2008 202
2013 197
2018 191
2023 192
203
23

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Cupar, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Cupar is Slightly Below Guidelines at 84%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Cupar
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011.
24

The status of energy upgrades to Cupar are shown in the chart below. HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Cupar School Cupar School
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has submitted a proposal for a facility upgrade at Cupar. The proposal is categorized as Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) in the Ministry of Education prioritization categories. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Cupar, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Cupar is Poor at 23%.
25

The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Equipment and Furnishings; Interiors.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Cupar
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
26

DR. ISMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
DR. ISMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Educational Program Dr. Isman Elementary School is a Kindergarten to grade 6 school in the community of Wolseley. Dr. Isman Elementary School has: a. a computer lab as part of the library; b. a professional development and resource centre for Division staff; c. a portable classroom that houses Division staff. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Dr. Isman Elementary are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Dr. Isman Elementary has increased from 103 students in 2003 to 137 students in 2008, primarily due to school consolidation in the area. As of September 30, 2008, there were 25 Montmartre School attendance area students attending Dr. Isman Elementary, and there were 17 Montmartre School attendance area students attending Wolseley High School. The enrolment is projected to remain near the current enrolment over the next 15 years, unless the out of attendance area student trends from the Montmartre School attendance area change.

K to 6
School
Dr. Isman Elementary School
2004 96
2005 110
2006 112
2007 137
2008 137
2013 144
2018 137
2023 138
103
27

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Dr. Isman Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Dr. Isman Elementary Meets Guidelines at 99%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Dr. Isman
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
28

The status of energy upgrades to Dr. Isman Elementary are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Dr Isman Elementary School Dr Isman Elementary School Dr Isman Elementary School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Dr. Isman Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division, is shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Dr. Isman Elementary is Very Poor at 34%.
29

The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Dr Isman Elementary
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
30

EDENWOLD SCHOOL June 30, 2009
EDENWOLD SCHOOL
Educational Program Edenwold is a Kindergarten to grade 6 school. The building is composed of a number of modular portable units around a relatively small core facility. Edenwold School has: a. a computer lab. The school does not have a gymnasium, and uses a nearby community building for physical education activities. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Edenwold are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Edenwold has decreased from 60 students in 2003 to 55 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 30 to 40 students over the next 15 years due to a smaller number of Kindergarten students replacing a larger number of graduating grade 6 students.

K to 6
School
Edenwold School
2004 61
2005 61
2006 54
2007 63
2008 55
2013 43
2018 36
2023 35
60
31

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Edenwold, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Edenwold is Below Guidelines at 68%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Edenwold
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80% 80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70% 70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51% 51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
32

school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Edenwold are shown in the chart below. In the chart below, HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Edenwold School Edenwold School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
33

The 2008 rating for this school, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Edenwold is Very Poor at 41%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Edenwold
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
34

FORT QUAPPELLE ELEMENTARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
FORT QUAPPELLE ELEMENTARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL
Educational Program Fort QuAppelle Elementary Community School is a Pre-Kindergarten to grade 7 school. Fort QuAppelle Elementary Community School has: a. a Pre-Kindergarten program; b. a nutrition / kitchen for hot lunches for both the elementary school and the adjacent Bert Fox High School; c. a band / music room; d. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Fort QuAppelle Elementary are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Fort QuAppelle Elementary has increased from 332 students in 2003 to 350 students in 2008, primarily due to fluctuations in First Nations enrolment. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 330 to 340 students over the next 15 years, primarily due to a decline in First Nations enrolment.

PK to 7
School
Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary C.S.
2004 407
2005 429
2006 442
2007 371
2008 350
2013 333
2018 333
2023 331
332
35

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Fort QuAppelle Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Fort QuAppelle Elementary Meets Guidelines at 90%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
36

The status of energy upgrades to Fort QuAppelle Elementary are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Fort QuAppelle Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Fort QuAppelle Elementary is Fair at 10%.
37

The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Equipment and Furnishings; Interiors.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
38

GREENALL HIGH SCHOOL June 30, 2009
GREENALL HIGH SCHOOL
Educational Program Greenall High is a grades 9 to 12 school in the Town of Balgonie. Grenall High School has: a. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; b. a shop for Metalwork courses; c. a lab for Arts courses; d. a Band room; e. a lab for Home Economics courses; f. four labs for Science courses; g. three computer labs; h. a multi-purpose room that is used for physical education activities; i. a Bridges program. With a growing enrolment, the school is lacking in specialized spaces, including: a. practical and applied arts spaces; b. performing arts spaces; c. a second gymnasium; and other features of a larger high school, such as a cafeteria, social spaces, etc. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Greenall High are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Greenall High has increased from 630 students in 2003 to 688 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to increase over the next 15 years due to a continued demand for new housing in the area. Greenall High serves the communities of Balgonie, Pilot Butte, White City, McLean, and the Rural Municipality of Edenwold. Saskatchewan Municipal Affairs Community Planning has initiated discussions with municipalities in the area with the goal of developing a more coordinated approach to regional land use planning and servicing of the area. The results could see a significant change in the potential for future residential growth in the Balgonie, Pilot Butte, White City, McLean, and the Rural Municipality of Edenwold areas which, in turn, could result in the need to review the 15 year enrolment projections, including the number of required schools to serve the area.

9 to 12
School
Greenall High School
2004 646
2005 667
2006 681
2007 691
2008 688
2013 705
2018 868
2023 921
630
39

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Greenall High, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Greenall High is Slightly Above Guidelines at 105%.
40

Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Greenall High
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Greenall High are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Greenall High Greenall High Greenall High
Current Capital Projects Other The Ministry of Education has approved capital funding for an accessibility lift to the stage at the school. The Division has received Ministry of Education planning funding for a Phase 1 Modernization, and for 4 relocatable classrooms. The Division has applied for major funding for
41

a replacement school which is categorized as Priority 2 (Critical Space Shortage) in the Ministry of Education priority categories. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Greenall High, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Greenall High is Fair at 8%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Interiors; Core Mechanical Systems.
42

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Greenall High
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
43

GRENFELL ELEMENTARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
GRENFELL ELEMENTARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL
Educational Program Grenfell Elementary Community School is a Pre-Kindergarten to grade 6 school. Grenfell Elementary School has: a. a Pre-Kindergarten program; b. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Grenfell Elementary are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Grenfell Elementary has increased from 133 students in 2003 to 160 students in 2008, primarily due to larger Kindergarten enrolments replacing smaller grade 6 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 115 to 125 students over the next 15 years due to smaller Kindergarten enrolments.

PK to 6
School
Grenfell Elementary School
2004 159
2005 131
2006 144
2007 142
2008 160
2013 125
2018 116
2023 117
133
44

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Grenfell Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Grenfell Elementary is Slightly below Guidelines at 87%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Grenfell Elementary
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80% 80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
45

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Grenfell Elementary are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Grenfell Elementary School Grenfell Elementary School Grenfell Elementary School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
46

The 2008 rating for Grenfell Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Grenfell Elementary is Very Poor at 39%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Grenfell Elementary
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
47

GRENFELL HIGH COMMUNITY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
GRENFELL HIGH COMMUNITY SCHOOL
Educational Program Grenfell High is a grades 7 to 12 school. Grenfell High School has: a. the Pathfinders program; b. an Opportunity program; c. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; d. a lab for Home Economics courses; e. a lab for Science courses; f. a student lounge; g. a computer lab; h. a band room. Students from Wolseley High School use the Industrial Arts shop and the Home Economics lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Grenfell High are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Grenfell High has decreased from 169 students in 2003 to 129 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller grade 7 enrolments replacing larger grade 12 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years.

7 to 12
School
Grenfell High School
2004 142
2005 138
2006 129
2007 134
2008 129
2013 130
2018 140
2023 145
169
48

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Grenfell High, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Grenfell High is Below Guidelines at 60%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Grenfell High
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90%90% 87% 87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51% 51%
60%
50%
45% 45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
49

The status of energy upgrades to Grenfell High are shown in the chart below. HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Grenfell High Community SchHVAC distrib & BAS Grenfell High Community SchLighting retrofit
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Grenfell High, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Grenfell High is Very Poor at 46%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of:
50

Equipment & Furnishings; Envelope; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Grenfell High
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
51

INDIAN HEAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
INDIAN HEAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Educational Program Indian Head Elementary is a Pre-Kindergarten to grade 6 school. Indian Head Elementary has a Pre-Kindergarten program. Indian Head Elementary School has: a. a Pre-Kindergarten program; b. a lunch room; c. a band room; d. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Indian Head Elementary are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Indian Head Elementary has decreased slightly from 202 students in 2003 to 201 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to increase to between 210 and 220 students over the next 15 years, primarily due to a larger Kindergarten enrolment replacing a smaller grade 6 enrolment.

PK to 6
School
Indian Head Elementary School
2004 197
2005 181
2006 166
2007 205
2008 201
2013 213
2018 220
2023 219
202
52

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Indian Head Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Indian Head Elementary is Slightly Below Guidelines at 87%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Indian Head Elementary
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
53

school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Indian Head Elementary are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Indian Head Elementary School Indian Head Elementary School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
54

The 2008 rating for Indian Head Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Indian Head Elementary is Good at 5%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Indian Head Elementary
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
55

INDIAN HEAD HIGH SCHOOL June 30, 2009
INDIAN HEAD HIGH SCHOOL
Educational Program Indian Head High is a grades 7 to 12 school. Indian Head High School has: a. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; b. a lab for Home Economics courses; c. two labs for Science courses; d. a weight room; e. two computer labs. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Indian Head High are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Indian Head High has decreased from 276 students in 2003 to 230 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller grade 7 enrolments from Indian Head Elementary and smaller grade 10 enrolments from James Hamblin replacing larger graduating grade 12 enrolments. The enrolment is projected to increase to 265 to 270 students over the next 15 years primarily due to larger projected enrolments from Indian Head Elementary.

7 to 12
School
Indian Head High School
2004 263
2005 244
2006 219
2007 225
2008 230
2013 234
2018 255
2023 269
276
56

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Indian Head High, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Indian Head High is Below Guidelines at 78%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Indian Head High
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70% 70% 70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
57

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Indian Head High are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Indian Head High School Indian Head High School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
58

The 2008 rating for Indian Head High, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Indian Head High is Fair at 13%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Indian Head High
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
59

JAMES HAMBLIN SCHOOL June 30, 2009
JAMES HAMBLIN SCHOOL
Educational Program James Hamblin School is a Kindergarten to grade 9 school in the Town of QuAppelle. James Hamblin School has: a. a community based pre-school program; b. an Arts room; c. a lab for Science courses; d. a Cooperative Learning Centre with couches and chairs; e. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for James Hamblin are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at James Hamblin has decreased from 163 students in 2003 to 122 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller Kindergarten enrolments replacing larger grade 9 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 80 students over the next 15 years due to the same continuing trends.

K to 9
School
James Hamblin School
2004 151
2005 135
2006 131
2007 133
2008 122
2013 93
2018 86
2023 80
163
60

The 2008 general instruction utilization for James Hamblin, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at James Hamblin is Significantly Below Guidelines at 58%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - James Hamblin
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90% 90% 90% 87% 87% 84%
80%
80% 80% 80% 78% 75%
70%
70% 70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56% 55% 55% 51% 51%
60%
50%
45% 45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
61

The status of energy upgrades to James Hamblin are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
James Hamblin James Hamblin
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has submitted proposals for the demolition of six existing permanently constructed classrooms to be replaced with the appropriate number of relocatable classrooms based on current and projected enrolments. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
62

The 2008 rating for James Hamblin, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at James Hamblin is Poor at 26%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Equipment & Furnishings; Envelope; Interiors; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - James Hamblin
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
63

KELLIHER SCHOOL June 30, 2009
KELLIHER SCHOOL
Educational Program Kelliher is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school. Kelliher School has: a. a lab for Science courses; b. a multi-purpose / weight room; c. a computer lab; d. an Art room. Industrial Arts equipment has recently been installed in a regular classroom. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Kelliher are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Kelliher has decreased from 181 students in 2003 to 160 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller Kindergarten enrolments replacing larger grade 12 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years.

K to 12
School
Kelliher School
2004 166
2005 166
2006 143
2007 150
2008 160
2013 139
2018 158
2023 179
181
64

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Kelliher, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Kelliher is Below Guidelines at 67%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Kelliher
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90% 90%90% 87% 87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51% 51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
65

The status of energy upgrades to Kelliher are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Kelliher School Kelliher School
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has submitted a proposal for a major facility upgrade at Kelliher School. The proposed project is categorized as Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) in the Ministry of Education system of prioritization. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Kelliher, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Kelliher is Poor at 24%.
66

The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Equipment & Furnishings; Envelope; Interiors.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Kelliher
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
67

KENNEDY LANGBANK SCHOOL June 30, 2009
KENNEDY LANGBANK SCHOOL
Educational Program Kennedy Langbank is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school in the community of Kennedy. The school facility is composed of modular portable units with a core facility. Kennedy Langbank School has: a. a community based non-profit preschool program; b. a lab for Science courses; c. an Arts room; d. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Kennedy Langbank are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Kennedy Langbank has decreased from 124 students in 2003 to 58 students in 2008, primarily due to: a. grade configuration change; and b. smaller Kindergarten enrolments replacing larger grade 8 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 35 to 40 students over the next 15 years due to the same continuing trends.

K to 8
School
Kennedy Langbank School
2004 107
2005 107
2006 103
2007 69
2008 58
2013 39
2018 39
2023 36
124
68

The 2008 general instruction utilization for this school, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Kennedy Langbank is Significantly Below Guidelines at 45%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Kennedy Langbank
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
69

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Kennedy Langbank are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Kennedy Langbank School Kennedy Langbank School
furnaces Lighting retrofit
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
70

The 2008 rating for Kennedy Langbank, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below The facility condition index rating at Kennedy Langbank is Fair at 9%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Interiors; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Kennedy Langbank
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
71

KIPLING SCHOOL June 30, 2009
KIPLING SCHOOL
Educational Program Kipling is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school. The school is composed of two buildings with a municipal road in between the two. The Kipling Junior School building houses Kindergarten to grade 3. The building has: a. a small computer room; b. a library / music room; c. a resource room. There is no gymnasium with the building. Students use the gymnasium at the Senior School building. Kipling Senior School building accommodates grades 4 to 12 and has: a. a woodshop for Industrial Arts courses; b. a metalwork shop for Industrial Arts courses; c. a lab for Home Economics courses; d. two labs for Science courses; e. two computer labs; and f. a band room. It was noted that there is some duplication of resources and facilities by having two separate facilities (e.g. libraries, staff rooms, storage, etc.). It was also noted that there are some traffic safety issues related to having the municipal road in between the two buildings. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Kipling are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Kipling has increased from 290 students in 2003 to 355 students in 2008, primarily due to school consolidations and grade configuration changes in the area. The enrolment is projected remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years.

K to 12
School
Kipling School
2004 285
2005 273
2006 297
2007 354
2008 355
2013 354
2018 368
2023 357
290
General Instruction Utilization is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment divided by the general instruction classroom capacity of a school, and is designed to measure the extent to which the available space is used for classroom instruction, based upon Ministry of Education space standards. The General Instruction utilization number is an imperfect measure. In some respects the Ministry standards do not reflect 21st century teaching and support services delivery. However, the General Instruction percentages do provide a consistent measurement
72

and tool for a relative comparison of all schools. Utilization over 100% does not necessarily mean additional classroom space is required.
The 2008 general instruction utilization for Kipling, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Kipling K to 3 is Slightly Above Guidelines at 104%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Kipling K to 3
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
The general instruction utilization rate at Kipling 4 to 12 is Slightly Below Guidelines at 80%.
73

Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Kipling 4 to 12
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Kipling School are shown in the chart below. In the chart below, HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Kipling School Kipling School Kipling School
Current Capital Projects Other The Ministry of Education has approved capital funding for a washroom renovation at Kipling. The Division has not submitted any other proposals for major capital projects at this school at this time.
74

Rating Range 0% to 5% 6% to 15%. 16% to 29%. Rating Title Good Fair Poor Definition New condition. Meets present and foreseeable future requirements. Good condition. Meets all present requirements. Has significant deficiencies, but meets minimum requirements. Systems nearing the end of their normal life-cycle. 30% and higher. Very Poor Does not meet requirements. Immediate attending required. Systems at end of their life-cycle. Parts no longer in stock, or very difficult to obtain. High risk of system failure.
The 2008 rating for Kipling, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating for the Kipling K to 3 building is Poor at 26%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies in the K to 3 building were in the areas of: Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
75

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Kipling K to 3
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
The facility condition index rating at Kipling 4 to 12 building is Very Poor at 42%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies in the Grades 4 to 12 building were in the areas of: Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
76

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Kipling 4 to 12
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
77

LIPTON SCHOOL June 30, 2009
LIPTON SCHOOL
Educational Program Lipton is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school. Lipton School has: a. a community pre-school program; b. an Art room; c. a lab for Science courses; d. a computer lab. Grades 9 and 10 students from Lipton School use the Industrial Arts shop and the Home Economics lab at Cupar School. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Lipton are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Lipton has decreased from 156 students in 2003 to 105 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller Kindergarten enrolments replacing larger grade 12 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to decrease to between 90 and 100 students over the next 15 years due to the same continuing trends.

K to 12
School
Lipton School
2004 136
2005 115
2006 126
2007 102
2008 105
2013 95
2018 97
2023 91
156
78

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Lipton, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Lipton is Significantly Below Guidelines at 55%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Lipton
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90% 90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
79

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Lipton are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Lipton School Lipton School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
80

The 2008 rating for Lipton, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Lipton is Poor at 25%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Interiors; Envelope; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Lipton
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
81

LUMSDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
LUMSDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Educational Program Lumsden Elementary School has: a. a Pre-Kindergarten program; b. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Lumsden Elementary are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Lumsden Elementary has increased from 449 students in 2003 to 463 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to stay in the same enrolment range of 440 to 455 students over the next 15 years.

PK to 8
School
Lumsden Elementary School
2004 453
2005 463
2006 440
2007 442
2008 463
2013 441
2018 453
2023 454
449
82

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Lumsden Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Lumsden Elementary Exceeds Guidelines at 112%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Lumsden Elementary
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to this school are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Lumsden Elementary Lumsden Elementary Lumsden Elementary
83

Current Capital Projects Other The Ministry has approved a roof replacement for Lumsden Elementary School. The Division has submitted a proposal for a gymnasium addition and renovation, which categorized as Priority 2 (Critical Space Shortage) in the Ministry of Education priority category. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Lumsden Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Lumsden Elementary is Fair at 14%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Interior; Core Mechanical Systems.
84

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Lumsden Elementary
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
85

LUMSDEN HIGH SCHOOL June 30, 2009
LUMSDEN HIGH SCHOOL
Educational Program Lumsden High is a grades 9 to 12 school. Lumsden High School has: a. multi-purpose lunch room; b. a centre for severely handicapped students; c. a woodshop for Industrial Arts courses; d. an AutoCad room; e. a metalshop for Industrial Arts courses f. a lab for Home Economics courses; g. two labs for Science courses; h. two computer labs; i. a band room. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Lumsden High are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Lumsden High has decreased from 355 students in 2003 to 329 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 295 to 300 students over the next 15 years due to a smaller number of grade 9 students replacing a larger number of graduating grade 12 students.

9 to 12
School
Lumsden High School
2004 350
2005 349
2006 336
2007 351
2008 329
2013 338
2018 304
2023 297
355
86

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Lumsden High, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Lumsden High Meets Guidelines at 90%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Lumsden High
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
87

Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Lumsden High are shown in the chart below. In the chart below:: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Lumsden High Lumsden High Lumsden High
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division submitted a proposal for a facility upgrade at Lumsden High. This proposal is categorized as Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) in the Ministry of Education priority categorization. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
88

30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Lumsden High, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Lumsden High is Fair at 7%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Lumsden High
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
89

MCLEAN SCHOOL June 30, 2009
MCLEAN SCHOOL
Educational Program McLean is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school. McLean School has: a. a community hall that is attached to the school and is jointly shared with the community; b. computers in the Resource Centre (Library). One classroom in the school houses Division Office support services staff. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for McLean are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at McLean has decreased from 75 students in 2003 to 71 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to increase to 85 to 90 students over the next 15 years due to a larger number of Kindergarten students replacing a smaller number of graduating grade 8 students.

K to 8
School
McLean School
2004 72
2005 58
2006 60
2007 61
2008 71
2013 88
2018 90
2023 87
75
90

The 2008 general instruction utilization for McLean, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at McLean Meets Guidelines at 90%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - McLean
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
91

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to McLean are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
McLean School McLean School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
92

The 2008 rating for McLean, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at McLean is Poor at 27%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Interiors; Envelope; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - McLean
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
93

MILESTONE SCHOOL June 30, 2009
MILESTONE SCHOOL
Educational Program Milestone is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school. There are two school facilities that form Milestone School. There is the Kindergarten to grade 4 building, and the separate grade 5 to 12 building. There is a municipal road in between the two buildings. The Milestone Kindergarten to grade 4 building has: a. a multi-purpose / physical activity room; b. a computer lab; c. a resource centre / library. The Milestone grades 5 to 12 building has: a. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; b. a lab for Home Economics courses; c. a lab for Science courses; d. two lunch rooms; e. a computer lab. It was noted that there is some duplication of resources and facilities by having two separate facilities (e.g. libraries, staff rooms, storage, etc.). Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Milestone are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Milestone has increased from 184 students in 2003 to 205 students in 2008, primarily due to school consolidation. The enrolment is projected to increase to 205 to 225 students over the next 15 years due to a larger number of Kindergarten students replacing a smaller number of graduating grade 12 students, and some housing development in Milestone.

K to 12
School
Milestone School
2004 187
2005 192
2006 182
2007 229
2008 205
2013 204
2018 209
2023 223
184
94

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Milestone, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at the Milestone K to 4 building is Below Guidelines at 75%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Milestone K to 4
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
95

The general instruction utilization rate at Milestone 5 to 12 building is Significantly Below Guidelines at 55%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Milestone 5 to 12
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Milestone are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Milestone School (High) Milestone School (High)
96

6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Milestone, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the charts below. The facility condition index rating at the Milestone K to 4 building is Poor at 24%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies for the Milestone K to 4 building were in the areas of: Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
97

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Milestone K to 4
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
The facility condition index rating at the Milestone 5 to 12 building is Very Poor at 54%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies for the Milestone 5 to 12 building were in the areas of: Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
98

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Milestone 5 to 12
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
99

MONTMARTRE SCHOOL June 30, 2009
MONTMARTRE SCHOOL
Educational Program Montmartre is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school. Montmartre School has: a. a community based non-profit day care that is scheduled to begin operation in late fall 2009; b. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; c. a lab for Home Economics courses; d. a lab for Science courses; e. an Art room; f. two computer labs; g. a multi-purpose band / music room. One classroom is used for Division Information Technology staff. A recent decision has been made to introduce a daycare in the school facility beginning in late 2009. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Montmartre are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Montmartre has increased from 182 students in 2003 to 197 students in 2008, primarily due to school consolidation in the area. The enrolment is projected to remain in the next enrolment range over the next 15 years. As of September 30, 2008, there were 25 Montmartre School attendance area students attending Dr. Isman Elementary, and there were 17 Montmartre School attendance area students attending Wolseley High School. The enrolment is projected to remain near the current enrolment over the next 15 years, unless the out of attendance area student trends from the Montmartre School attendance area change.

K to 12
School
Montmartre School
2004 185
2005 194
2006 189
2007 198
2008 197
2013 207
2018 203
2023 196
182
General Instruction Utilization is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment divided by the general instruction classroom capacity of a school, and is designed to measure the extent to which the available space is used for classroom instruction, based upon Ministry of Education space standards. The General Instruction utilization number is an imperfect measure. In some respects the Ministry standards do not reflect 21st century teaching and support services
100

delivery. However, the General Instruction percentages do provide a consistent measurement and tool for a relative comparison of all schools. Utilization over 100% does not necessarily mean additional classroom space is required.
The 2008 general instruction utilization for Montmartre, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Montmartre is Significantly Below Guidelines at 56%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Montmartre
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
101

Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Montmartre are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Montmartre School Montmartre School
Current Capital Projects Other The Ministry of Education has approved capital funding for an accessible washroom / shower / therapy room at the school. The Ministry of Education has approved capital funding for a roofe replacement, in the high school, middle years, main entrance, and associated corridor roof sections, at the school. The Ministry of Education has approved capital funding for a daycare at the school. The capital costs are the responsibility of the Daycare Board. The Division has submitted a proposal for a major facility upgrade at Montmartre School. The proposed project is categorized as Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) in the Ministry of Education of categorizing priorities. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
102

Rating Range 0% to 5%
Rating Title Good
Definition New condition. Meets present and foreseeable future requirements. Good condition. Meets all present requirements. Has significant deficiencies, but meets minimum requirements. Systems nearing the end of their normal life-cycle. Does not meet requirements. Immediate attending required. Systems at end of their life-cycle. Parts no longer in stock, or very difficult to obtain. High risk of system failure.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Montmartre, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Montmartre is Poor at 27%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
103

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Montmartre
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
104

NORTH VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
NORTH VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Educational Program North Valley Elementary is a Kindergarten to grade 6 school in the community of Neudorf. North Valley Elementary School has: a. a community based non-profit play school; b. a weight room; c. an Audio Visual room; d. a band room; e. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for North Valley Elementary are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at North Valley Elementary has decreased from 100 students in 2003 to 84 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller Kindergarten enrolments replacing larger grade 6 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 70 students over the next 15 years due to the same continuing trends.

K to 6
School
North Valley Elementary School
2004 97
2005 94
2006 95
2007 89
2008 84
2013 77
2018 78
2023 70
100
105

The 2008 general instruction utilization for North Valley Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at North Valley Elementary is Significantly Below Guidelines at 51%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - North Valley Elementary
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90%90% 87% 87% 84%
80%
80%80% 80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70% 70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51% 51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
106

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. North Valley Elementary School is not included in this particular capital program. Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has not submitted any proposals for major capital projects at this school at this time. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor. Rating Range 0% to 5% Rating Title Good Definition New condition. Meets present and foreseeable future requirements. Good condition. Meets all present requirements. Has significant deficiencies, but meets minimum requirements. Systems nearing the end of their normal lifecycle. Does not meet requirements. Immediate attending required. Systems at end of their life-cycle. Parts no longer in stock, or very difficult to obtain. High risk of system failure.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for North Valley Elementary, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at North Valley Elementary is Poor at 29%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope;
107

Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - North Valley Elementary
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
108

NORTH VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL June 30, 2009
NORTH VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL
Educational Program North Valley High is a grades 7 to 12 school in the community of Lemberg. North Valley High School has: a. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; b. a lab for Home Economics courses; c. a lab for Science courses; d. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for North Valley High are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at North Valley High has increased slightly from 117 students in 2003 to 119 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 65 to 75 students over the next 15 years, primarily due to smaller grade 7 enrolments replacing larger grade 12 graduating enrolments.

7 to 12
School
North Valley High School
2004 113
2005 109
2006 111
2007 125
2008 119
2013 76
2018 63
2023 66
117
Utilization Range 110% or higher Utilization Title Exceed Guidelines Utilization Range 80% to 89% Utilization Title Slightly Below Guidelines
109

101% to 110% 90% to 100%
Slightly Above Guidelines Meets Guidelines
60% to 79% 59% or Lower
Below Guidelines Signficantly Below Guidelines
The 2008 general instruction utilization for North Valley High, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at North Valley High is Below Guidelines at 61%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - North Valley High
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80% 80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45% 45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
110

The status of energy upgrades to North Valley High are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
North Valley High School North Valley High School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for North Valley High, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at North Valley High is Poor at 23%.
111

The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - North Valley High
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
112

PENSE SCHOOL June 30, 2009
PENSE SCHOOL
Educational Program Pense School is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school. Most grades 9 to 12 students attend Regina high schools on a tuition fee basis. Pense School has: a. a community based play school; b. a band room; c. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Pense are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Pense has decreased from 95 students in 2003 to 71 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 60 to 80 students over the next 15 years due to a smaller number of Kindergarten students replacing a larger number of graduating grade 8 students.

K to 8
School
Pense School
2004 91
2005 95
2006 89
2007 83
2008 71
2013 83
2018 80
2023 59
95
113

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Pense, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Pense is Significantly Below Guidelines at 51%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Pense
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
114

school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Pense are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Pense School Pense School Pense School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
115

The 2008 rating for Pense, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Pense is Very Poor at 43%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Pense
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
116

PILOT BUTTE SCHOOL June 30, 2009
PILOT BUTTE SCHOOL
Educational Program Pilot Butte is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school. Pilot Butte School has: a. a centre for severely handicapped students; b. an Art room; c. a lab for Home Economics courses; d. a lab for Science courses; e. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Pilot Butte are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Pilot Butte has decreased from 374 students in 2003 to 342 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 305 and 330 students over the next 15 years due to a smaller number of Kindergarten students replacing a larger number of graduating grade 8 students.

K to 8
School
Pilot Butte School
2004 390
2005 379
2006 376
2007 376
2008 342
2013 328
2018 324
2023 308
374
However, three (3) major subdivisions are proposed for the Town of Pilot Butte. The size and scale of each of these three (3) proposed developments is indicated below. Marathon Developments (north of existing Town): Proposed Development = 166 single family lots, 292 townhouses, 396 condominiums, 252 seniors oriented housing units. Northridge Development (east of existing Town): Proposed Development = 176 single family lots. Aspen Estates (south of existing Town): Proposed Development = 166 single family lots. Each of these developments have been awaiting Town of Pilot Butte servicing approval.
117

On June 5, 2009, the Town of Pilot Butte received a conditional combined Canada / Saskatchewan infrastructure grant of $12,443,333 towards the construction Central Water Treatment System. The total project costs are estimated at $18,665,000, with the difference between the Canada / Saskatchewan infrastructure grant and the total project costs being provided by the Town of Pilot Butte and / or land developers. The Prairie Valley School Division will need to communicate with the Town of Pilot Butte and the land developers to ensure that an adequate number, size, and location of school sites are planned for as part of the land use development plans. Saskatchewan Municipal Affairs Community Planning has also initiated discussions with municipalities in the area with the goal of developing a more coordinated approach to regional land use planning and servicing of the area. The results over the above studies, reports, and infrastructure grant could result in a significant change in the potential for future residential growth in the Town of Pilot Butte and surrounding area which, in turn, could result in the need to review the 15 year enrolment projections, including the number of required schools to serve the area. General Instruction Utilization is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment divided by the general instruction classroom capacity of a school, and is designed to measure the extent to which the available space is used for classroom instruction, based upon Ministry of Education space standards. The General Instruction utilization number is an imperfect measure. In some respects the Ministry standards do not reflect 21st century teaching and support services delivery. However, the General Instruction percentages do provide a consistent measurement and tool for a relative comparison of all schools. Utilization over 100% does not necessarily mean additional classroom space is required.
The 2008 general instruction utilization for Pilot Butte, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Pilot Butte is Slightly Below Guidelines at 80%.
118

Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Pilot Butte
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to this school are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Pilot Butte K-8 Pilot Butte K-8 Pilot Butte K-8
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has not submitted any proposals for major capital projects at this school at this time.
119

6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Pilot Butte, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Pilot Butte is Fair at 8%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the area of Interiors.
120

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Pilot Butte
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
121

ROBERT SOUTHEY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
ROBERT SOUTHEY SCHOOL
Educational Program Robert Southey is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school located in the Town of Southey. Robert Southey School has: a. a community based non-profit pre-school program; c. a weight room; d. an Art room; e. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; f. a lab for Home Economics courses; g. two computer labs. There is no lab for science program courses. There is no band / music room. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Robert Southey are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Robert Southey has increased from 269 students in 2003 to 304 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years. The Town of Southey is proposing a new subdivision on the northern edge of the Town.

K to 12
School
Robert Southey School
2004 259
2005 259
2006 248
2007 305
2008 304
2013 305
2018 299
2023 297
269
122

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Robert Southey, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Robert Southey Meets Guidelines at 99%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Robert Southey
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80% 80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45% 45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
123

Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Robert Southey are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Robert Southey Robert Southey
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has submitted a proposal for a major facility upgrade to the school. The proposed project is categorized as Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) in the Ministry of Education priority categorizations. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data.
124

The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.

6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Robert Southey, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Robert Southey is Fair at 11%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Robert Southey
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
125

SEDLEY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
SEDLEY SCHOOL
Educational Program Sedley is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school. Sedley School has a community gymnasium / hall that is attached to the school. The facility is jointly shared by the school and the community. Sedley School has: a. resource / science room. b computer lab. The separate historic school facility on the site has been decommissioned. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Sedley are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Sedley has decreased from 84 students in 2003 to 79 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to increase to 90 to 100 students over the next 15 years.

K to 8
School
Sedley School
2004 67
2005 64
2006 52
2007 68
2008 79
2013 82
2018 98
2023 97
84
126

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Sedley, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Sedley is Below Guidelines at 70%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Sedley
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
127

school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Sedley are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Sedley School Sedley School Sedley School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
128

The 2008 rating for Sedley, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Sedley is Poor at 24%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Sedley
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
129

SOUTH SHORE SCHOOL June 30, 2009
SOUTH SHORE SCHOOL
Educational Program South Shore School is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school in the community of Regina Beach. South Shore School has: a. a kitchen that is shared with the community. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for South Shore are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at South Shore has decreased from 172 students in 2003 to 138 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to decrease to 120 to 135 students over the next 15 years due to a smaller number of Kindergarten students replacing a larger number of graduating grade 8 students.

K to 8
School
South Shore School
2004 161
2005 157
2006 141
2007 147
2008 138
2013 137
2018 133
2023 123
172
130

The 2008 general instruction utilization for South Shore, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at South Shore Meets Guidelines at 98%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - South Shore
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95%94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
131

The status of energy upgrades to South Shore are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
South Shore South Shore
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for this South Shore, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at South Shore is Poor at 16%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the area of Interiors.
132

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - South Shore
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
133

STEWART NICKS SCHOOL June 30, 2009
STEWART NICKS SCHOOL
Educational Program Stewart Nicks is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school in the community of Grand Coulee. Most grades 9 to 12 students attend Regina high schools on a tuition fee basis. Stewart Nicks School has: a. a community based pre-school program; b. some computers in the Resource Centre (Library). Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Stewart Nicks are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Stewart Nicks has increased from 76 students in 2003 to 82 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years. There are subdivisions with houses under construction on the edge of the Village of Grand Coulee.

K to 8
School
Stewart Nicks School
2004 79
2005 85
2006 90
2007 85
2008 82
2013 100
2018 99
2023 85
76
134

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Stewart Nicks, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Stewart Nicks is Below Guidelines at 70%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Stewart Nicks
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51% 51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
135

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Stewart Nicks are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Stewart Nicks School Stewart Nicks School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
136

The 2008 rating for Stewart Nicks, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Stewart Nicks is Poor at 23%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the area of Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Stewart Nicks
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34% 29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
30%
20%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
137

VIBANK REGIONAL SCHOOL June 30, 2009
VIBANK REGIONAL SCHOOL
Educational Program Vibank Regional School is a Kindergarten to grade 12 school. Vibank Regional School has: a. library in two portables; b. a woodshop for Industrial Arts courses; c. a lab for Home Economics courses; d. a lab for Science courses; e. an Opportunity program room; f. two computer labs. The school has no band room nor an Art Room. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Vibank are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Vibank has increased from 183 students in 2003 to 262 students in 2008, primarily due to school consolidation in the area. The enrolment is projected to increase to 305 to 315 students over the next 15 years.

K to 12
School
Vibank School
2004 198
2005 194
2006 177
2007 266
2008 262
2013 292
2018 303
2023 303
183
138

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Vibank, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Vibank Meets Guidelines at 100%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Vibank
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80% 80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
139

The status of energy upgrades to Vibank are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Vibank School Vibank School
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has submitted a proposal for major restoration work at the school. The proposed project is categorized as Priority 3 (Structural Repair / Building Restoration) in the Ministry of Education priority categorization system. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Vibank, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Vibank is Poor at 28%.
140

The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Vibank
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
141

WHITE CITY SCHOOL June 30, 2009
WHITE CITY SCHOOL
Educational Program White City School is a Kindergarten to grade 8 school. White City School has: a. a band room; and b. a computer lab. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for White City are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at White City has increased from 426 students in 2003 to 539 students in 2008. The enrolment is projected to increase over the next 15 years due to a continued demand for new housing in the area.

K to 8
School
White City School
2004 397
2005 405
2006 449
2007 487
2008 539
2013 726
2018
2023
426
849 1,016
The main areas of residential growth in the attendance area are: a. the Town of White City; b. the Emerald Park area; and c. the Rural Municipality of Edenwold. The major new subdivision in the Town of White City is the Bower Estates subdivision is on the southern edge of the community. The next phase of development of the subdivision, the Bower West Concept Plan, is awaiting Town of White City servicing approval. Both subdivisions are done by Great Plains Leaseholds Ltd.
142

WHITE CITY / EMERALD PARK SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT 2004 TO 2008
BOWER ESTATES
BOWER WEST CONCEPT PLAN
Clear Vistas Community #1 Limited Partnership has acquired over 685 acres (with another 65 acres pending in 2009) of agricultural land in the Rural Municipality of Edenwold, south of the communities of White City and Emerald Park, located 10 kilometres east of Regina. In collaboration with the existing communities, Clear Vistas L.P. intends to develop its land acquisition with a potential of 3500 residences over a staged 10-year development period. The proposed is pending land use development and servicing approvals. The proposed development is unique in rural Saskatchewan in its proposed scale, size, and servicing requirements.
143

Saskatchewan Municipal Affairs Community Planning has also initiated discussions with municipalities in the area with the goal of developing a more coordinated approach to regional land use planning and servicing of the area. The results of the above studies and reports could result in a significant change in the potential for future residential growth in the Town of White City, Emerald Park, and surrounding area which, in turn, could result in the need to review the 15 year enrolment projections, including the number of required schools to serve the area. General Instruction Utilization is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment divided by the general instruction classroom capacity of a school, and is designed to measure the extent to which the available space is used for classroom instruction, based upon Ministry of Education space standards. The General Instruction utilization number is an imperfect measure. In some respects the Ministry standards do not reflect 21st century teaching and support services delivery. However, the General Instruction percentages do provide a consistent measurement and tool for a relative comparison of all schools. Utilization over 100% does not necessarily mean additional classroom space is required.
The 2008 general instruction utilization for White City, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at White City is Slightly Above Guidelines at 103%.
144

Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - White City
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to White City are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
White City Elementary White City Elementary White City Elementary
Current Capital Projects Other There are currently no Ministry approved active projects for this school. The Division has submitted a capital project request for a new school to service the area, which is substantiated by the updated enrolment projections prepared for the report. The proposed project is
145

categorized as Priority 2 (Critical Space Shortage) in the Ministry of Education system of priority categorization. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for White City, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at White City is Fair at 6%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Equipment & Furnishings; Core Mechanical Systems.
146

Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - White City
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
147

WHITEWOOD SCHOOL June 30, 2009
WHITEWOOD SCHOOL
Educational Program Whitewood is a Pre-Kindergarten to grade 12 school. Whitewood School has: a. a Pre-Kindergarten program; b. a band room; c. a weight room; d. a multi-purpose breakfast / Art room; e. a shop for Industrial Arts courses; f. a lab for Home Economics courses; g. two labs for Science courses; h. a community room; i. two computer labs. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Whitewood are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Whitewood has decreased from 253 students in 2003 to 241 students in 2008, primarily due to smaller Kindergarten enrolments replacing larger grade 12 graduating enrolments. The enrolment is projected to remain in the same enrolment range over the next 15 years.

PK to 12
School
Whitewood School
2004 256
2005 242
2006 238
2007 231
2008 241
2013 230
2018 232
2023 241
253
148

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Whitewood, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Whitewood is Below Guidelines at 70%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Whitewood
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80% 80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70% 70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56% 55%55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
149

program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Whitewood are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Whitewood School Whitewood School
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
30% and higher.
Very Poor
150

The 2008 rating for Whitewood, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Whitewood is Very Poor at 40%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems; Core Plumbing Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Whitewood
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
151

WOLSELEY HIGH SCHOOL June 30, 2009
WOLSELEY HIGH SCHOOL
Educational Program Wolseley High is a grades 7 to 12 school. Wolseley High School has: a. an Art Room; b. a lab for Science courses; c. a computer lab. The school does not have: a. a band room; b. an Industrial Arts shop; c. Home Economics lab. Students from Wolseley High School use the Industrial Arts shop and the Home Economics lab at Grenfell High School. Historical and Projected Enrolments, Capacity and Utilization The historical and projected enrolments for Wolseley High are shown in the chart below. The enrolment at Wolseley High has increased from 97 students in 2003 to 137 students in 2008, primarily due to school consolidation in the area. The enrolment is projected to remain close to the current enrolment over the next 15 years. As of September 30, 2008, there were 25 Montmartre School attendance area students attending Dr. Isman Elementary, and there were 17 Montmartre School attendance area students attending Wolseley High School. The enrolment is projected to remain near the current enrolment over the next 15 years, unless the out of attendance area student trends from the Montmartre School attendance area change.

7 to 12
School
Wolseley High School
2004 113
2005 118
2006 111
2007 140
2008 137
2013 153
2018 148
2023 134
97
152

The 2008 general instruction utilization for Wolseley High, relative to other schools in the Division is shown in the chart below. The general instruction utilization rate at Wolseley High Exceeds Guidelines at 114%.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008 - Wolseley
120%
114% 112% 105% 104% 103%
110%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80% 80%80% 78% 75%
70%
70% 70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56% 55%55% 51%51%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
153

Current Capital Projects Energy Upgrades The Division is in the midst of a systemic energy upgrade of electrical and mechanical systems in schools in the Division. The Division has been looking at ways to enhance the condition of its school facilities following the restructuring of school divisions in 2006. The energy upgrade program will replace aging school infrastructure with more energy efficient equipment and systems. This work began in mid 2006 and is scheduled to be completed in late 2011. The status of energy upgrades to Wolseley High are shown in the chart below. In the chart below: HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning Systems. BAS = Building Automation Systems.
Wolseley High School Wolseley High School Wolseley High School
Current Capital Projects Other The Ministry of Education has approved capital funding for gymnasium service upgrades at the school. The Division has not submitted any proposals for major capital projects at this school at this time. Facility Condition Assessment The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data. The ratings range from Good to Fair to Poor to Very Poor.
6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.
Fair Poor
154

30% and higher.
Very Poor
The 2008 rating for Wolseley High, relative to other schools in the Division, are shown in the chart below. The facility condition index rating at Wolseley High is Very Poor at 34%. The most significant facility condition deficiencies were in the areas of: Envelope; Equipment & Furnishings; Interiors; Core Electrical Systems; Core Mechanical Systems.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008 - Wolseley High
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
155
Strategic Facilities Plan Appendix B: Public Information Open Houses Handouts / Display Panels / Public Comments
PUBLIC INFORMATION OPEN HOUSE

PURPOSE Purpose of the Public Information Open Houses To inform parents, staff & students on: * * * * * * * Plan Purpose and Key Factors Process plan and schedule Historical and projected enrolments Facility Condition Assessment Facility Utilization Strategic Facility Planning Vision and Principles Facility Renewal Plan Options
To give parents, staff & students an opportunity to provide written comments and / or suggestions on: * Strategic facilities planning vision and principles * Facility Renewal Plan options. PROCESS AND SCHEDULE Fall 2008 to February 2009 * Review of demographics, school capacity and utilization * Educational Program Review * Facility Condition Review * Development of draft Strategic Facilities Planning Principles * Development of draft Facilities Renewal Plan options Public Information Open Houses and review of comments and options Board review of draft Strategic Facilities Plan Board receipt of final Strategic Facilities Plan
March 2009
Spring 2009 Spring 2009
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Questions and Answers about the Prairie Valley School Division Strategic Facilities Plan
Question 1: What is the purpose of the Strategic Facilities Plan? The purpose is to develop a long term planning framework that: a. responds to change to changing demographics: b. responds to changing expectations on educational programs and services; c. addresses building conditions; d. responsibly manages the Divisions budget and capital spending. Question 2: Is this a school closure or school consolidation study or plan? Is there a plan to close my school as part of the Strategic Facilities Plan? No. This process is about developing a proactive strategy to ensure Prairie Valley School Division students, staff and communities have the best schools possible within a financially sustainable framework. Question 3: Why are the facilities in the shape and condition that they are in? Prior to amalgamation, there was limited local or provincial capital funding available for major facilities improvements. The Prairie Valley School Division Board has prioritized facility renewal in its strategic and budget planning processes, and within the past year there has been a significant increase in Saskatchewan government capital funding for school facilities. Question 4: What is the timeframe of my school receiving facilities improvements? Most school facilities are currently in the midst of receiving energy efficiency upgrades to their electrical and mechanical systems. This information is shown on one of the panels at this public information open house. In addition, the Prairie Valley School Division has various minor renovation upgrade projects underway, and others that have been submitted to the provincial government. These existing projects and conditional government approvals are shown on a separate panel. The Strategic Facilities Plan proposes a facilities renewal plan that includes major renovations, additions to schools, and new schools. The proposed timing of major renovations, additions to schools, and new schools are shown on a separate panel. However, the actual timing may vary depending upon the annual budget decisions made by the Board of Education and the availability of provincial funding. Question 5: Are my children getting a lower of a quality of education because of the condition of my school facility? No. However, the major energy efficiency upgrades, coupled with major renovations, additions to schools, and new schools, are meant to enhance the quality of the facilities environment and educational programming opportunities for students and staff.
Question 6:
Are my property taxes going to go up in order to implement this Strategic Facilities Plan? The Strategic Facilities Plan will include a 20 year facilities renewal strategy that will be developed taking into consideration the current annual capital expenditures of Prairie Valley School Division, potential capital grants from the Ministry of Education, and undertaking a realistic number of capital projects, within five year time periods, that will minimize the incremental impact on property taxes. The plan is long term and flexible. Progress on the capital program can be made faster or slower, depending upon the fiscal capacity of the Prairie Valley School Division. The Board of Education will continue to make capital spending decisions each year, as part of the budget and development process.
Question 7:
How were the enrolment projections created? What factors were taken into consideration? The enrolment projections were developed by: Obtaining municipal development plans from municipalities; Meeting with municipal planning and development officials to review land use development plans; Visiting Prairie Valley School Division schools and sites and updating floor plans and facility databases as they relate to operational capacity and utilization; Interviewing Division and school-based administrators; Interviewing Ministry of Education personnel; Obtaining Saskatchewan Vital Statistics birth information; Obtaining Federal census information; Reviewing historical enrolment trends; Creating 15 year enrolment projections by school, by year, by grade, by geographic area, using a enrolment projection methodology. Enrolment projections are reviewed and revised annually based upon the most current data available.
Question 8:
Where do I get a copy of the information that displayed here tonight? The information may be obtained at the Prairie Valley School Division website @ www.pvsd.ca beginning March 18, 2009 or by calling 306-949-3366.
Question 9:
Where do I leave, or to whom do I send, my written comments on this Open House? Comments can either be left at the Comment table at the Public Information Open House or be submitted by Monday, March 30, 2009 in writing by mail, fax or email to: Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, c/o Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1. email: hugh.skinner@stantec.com fax: 604-696-8100.
STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN COMMENTS

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Divisions Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional.
NAME: ____________________ ADDRESS: ________________________ (optional) (optional) SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: __________ (optional) IN GRADES: (optional) ____________________________ Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hugh.skinner@stantec.com Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: c/o Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
PURPOSE KEY FACTORS

Changing Demographics Changing demographics across the Division the Divisions enrolment is, in various geographic areas: a. declining; b. relatively constant; or c. increasing. Changing expectations regarding the type, quality and variety of educational programs and services offered to students and the related implications for facilities. The current condition of Prairie Valley School Division schools as measured by the Facility Condition Index and the need for strategic building updates and modernizations. The need to carefully manage the Divisions budget and make strategic capital spending decisions.
Changing Educational Programs
Condition of Facilities
Divisions Budget and Capital Spending
PROCESS AND SCHEDULE

Fall 2008 to February 2009 * Review of demographics, school capacity and utilization * Educational Program Review * Facility Condition Review * Development of draft Strategic Facilities Planning Principles * Development of draft Facilities Renewal Plan options
March 2009
Spring 2009 Spring 2009
Public Information Open Houses and review of comments and options

Board review of draft Strategic Facilities Plan Board receipt of final Strategic Facilities Plan
EXISTING AND APPROVED CAPITAL PROJECTS

Ministry Approved and Currently Active Projects (excluding energy upgrade projects)
Balcarres Community School Accessibility Lift (active) Balcarres Community School Phase 3 Addition/Renovation (approved) Greenall High School Phase 1 Modernization, 4 relocatable class rooms Grenfell Transportation Shop Renovation (active) Kipling School Washroom Renovation (approved) Lumsden Elementary School Roof Replacement (approved) Wolseley High School Gymnasium Service Upgrades (approved)
The School Division has funding allocated for projects that may arise through the fiscal year due to Health and Safety issues, the need for additional accessible wash rooms and the need for additional roof repairs.
Major Capital Projects Submitted for Ministry Approval and Funding Priority 2 (Critical Space Shortage)
Lumsden Elementary School, gymnasium addition/renovation White City School, new elementary school Greenall High School, addition/renovation
Priority 3 (Structural Repair/Building Restoration)

Cupar School, facility upgrade Vibank Regional School, restoration Bert Fox Community High School (Fort QuAppelle), facility upgrade Montmartre School, facility upgrade Kelliher School, facility upgrade Robert Southey School (Southey), facility upgrade Broadview School, facility upgrade Lumsden High School, facility upgrade James Hamblin School (QuAppelle), relocatables/mechanical upgrade
In addition to the priority 2 and 3 projects the School Division has submitted numerous minor capital upgrades and renovations to the Ministry for approval and subsequent funding.
ENERGY UPGRADE CAPITAL PROJECTS AND SCHEDULE

Completed Projected 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASONDJ F MAMJ J ASOND Clive Draycott School Clive Draycott School Clive Draycott School Lumsden Elementary Lumsden Elementary Lumsden Elementary Lumsden High Lumsden High Lumsden High Pense School Pense School Pense School South Shore South Shore Stewart Nicks School Stewart Nicks School Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit
HVAC = Heating Ventilating Air Conditioning systems BAS = Building Automation Systems

Balgonie Elementary School Balgonie Elementary School Balgonie Elementary School Cupar School Cupar School Edenwold School Edenwold School Greenall High Greenall High Greenall High McLean School McLean School Milestone School (High) Milestone School (High) Pilot Butte K-8 Pilot Butte K-8 Pilot Butte K-8 Robert Southey Robert Southey Sedley High School Sedley High School Sedley High School Vibank School Vibank School Vibank School White City Elementary White City Elementary White City Elementary HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room

Balcarres Community School Balcarres Community School Balcarres Community School Bert Fox Community High Bert Fox Community High Dr Isman Elementary School Dr Isman Elementary School Dr Isman Elementary School Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary Indian Head Elementary School Indian Head Elementary School Indian Head High School Indian Head High School James Hamblin James Hamblin Kelliher School Kelliher School Lipton School Lipton School Montmartre School Montmartre School North Valley High School North Valley High School Wolseley High School Wolseley High School Wolseley High School HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit HVAC distrib & BAS Lighting retrofit New boiler room

Broadview School HVAC distrib & BAS Broadview School Lighting retrofit Broadview School New boiler room Grenfell Elementary School HVAC distrib & BAS Grenfell Elementary School Lighting retrofit Grenfell Elementary School New boiler room Grenfell High Community SchHVAC distrib & BAS Grenfell High Community SchLighting retrofit Kennedy Langbank School furnaces Kennedy Langbank School Lighting retrofit Kipling School HVAC distrib & BAS Kipling School Lighting retrofit Kipling School New boiler room Whitewood School HVAC distrib & BAS Whitewood School Lighting retrofit
HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED ENROLMENTS

Grade Configuration
K to 8 PK to 8 9 to 12 K to 8 K to 8 K to 8 PK to 12
School
Clive Draycott School Lumsden Elementary School Lumsden High School Pense School South Shore School Stewart Nicks School Total
2003 87 449 355 95 172 76 1,234
2004 81 453 350 91 161 79 1,215
2005 87 463 349 95 157 85 1,236
2006 89 440 336 89 141 90 1,185
2007 98 442 351 83 147 85 1,206
2008 96 463 329 71 138 82 1,179
2013 87 421 333 64 140 91 1,136
2018 86 425 298 55 134 94 1,092
2023 90 422 293 50 124 91 1,070
The enrolment projections were developed by: Obtaining municipal development plans from municipalities; Meeting with municipal planning and development officials to review land use development plans; Visiting Prairie Valley School Division schools and sites and updating floor plans and facility databases as they relate to operational capacity and utilization; Interviewing Division and school-based administrators; Interviewing Ministry of Education personnel; Obtaining Saskatchewan Vital Statistics birth information; Obtaining Federal census information; Reviewing historical enrolment trends; Creating 15 year enrolment projections by school, by year, by grade, by geographic area, using a cohort-survival enrolment projection methodology, taking into consideration the above information sources.
Enrolment projections are reviewed and revised annually, based upon the most current data available.

Grade Configuration
K to 8 K to 12 K to 6 9 to 12 K to 8 K to 12 K to 8 K to 12 K to 8 K to 12 K to 8 PK to 12
School
Balgonie Elementary School Cupar School Edenwold School Greenall High School McLean School Milestone School Pilot Butte School Robert Southey School Sedley School Vibank School White City School Total
2003 380 203 60 630 75 184 374 269 84 183 426 2,868
2004 376 197 61 646 72 187 390 259 67 198 397 2,850
2005 397 197 61 667 58 192 379 259 64 194 405 2,873
2006 376 188 54 681 60 182 376 248 52 177 449 2,843
2007 410 190 63 691 61 229 376 305 68 266 487 3,146
2008 440 202 55 688 71 205 342 304 79 262 539 3,187
2013 518 218 35 744 93 198 318 305 88 281 653 3,451
2018 611 213 35 810 92 209 318 299 91 284 850 3,812
2023 640 208 35 983 91 234 320 298 88 310 1,119 4,326

Grade Configuration
PK to 12 8 to 12 K to 6 PK to 7 PK to 6 7 to 12 K to 9 K to 12 K to 12 K to 12 K to 6 7 to 12 7 to 12 PK to 12
School
Balcarres Community School Bert Fox Community High School Dr. Isman Elementary School Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary C.S. Indian Head Elementary School Indian Head High School James Hamblin School Kelliher School Lipton School Montmartre School North Valley Elementary School North Valley High School Wolseley High School Total
2003 481 430 103 332 202 276 163 181 156 182 100 117 97 2,820
2004 513 383 96 407 197 263 151 166 136 185 97 113 113 2,820
2005 475 348 110 429 181 244 135 166 115 194 94 109 118 2,718
2006 470 325 112 442 166 219 131 143 126 189 95 111 111 2,640
2007 449 370 137 371 205 225 133 150 102 198 89 125 140 2,694
2008 468 320 137 350 201 230 122 160 105 197 84 119 137 2,630
2013 475 277 142 311 213 235 94 161 89 197 68 76 151 2,489
2018 485 249 137 319 235 261 86 160 93 192 80 63 147 2,507
2023 468 261 138 315 230 269 80 150 91 192 80 66 132 2,472
The enrolment projections were developed by: Obtaining municipal development plans from municipalities; Meeting with municipal planning and development officials to review land use development plans; Visiting Prairie Valley School Division schools and sites and updating floor plans and facility databases as they relate to operational capacity and utilization; Interviewing Division and school-based administrators; Interviewing Ministry of Education personnel; Obtaining Saskatchewan Vital Statistics birth information; Obtaining Federal census information; Reviewing historical enrolment trends; Creating 15 year enrolment projections by school, by year, by grade, by geographic area, using a cohort-survival enrolment projection methodology, taking into consideration the above information sources. Enrolment projections are reviewed and revised annually, based upon the most current data available.

Grade Configuration
K to 12 PK to 6 7 to 12 K to 8 K to 12 PK to 12 PK to 12
School
Broadview School Grenfell Elementary School Grenfell High School Kennedy Langbank School Kipling School Whitewood School Total
2003 218 133 169 124 290 253 1,187
2004 161 159 142 107 285 256 1,110
2005 147 131 138 107 273 242 1,038
2006 137 144 129 103 297 238 1,048
2007 132 142 134 69 354 231 1,062
2008 133 160 129 58 355 241 1,076
2013 126 161 133 38 359 239 1,056
2018 117 162 124 40 368 242 1,054
2023 107 162 127 36 350 252 1,035
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization for All Schools 2008
120%
114% 112% 105%
110%
104% 103%
100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%
90%
90%90%90% 87%87% 84%
80%
80%80%80% 78% 75% 70%70%70% 68% 67% 66% 61% 60% 58% 56%55% 55% 51%51%
70%
60%
50%
45%45%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
General Instruction Utilization is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment divided by the general instruction classroom capacity of a school as defined by the Ministry of Education. Utilization over 100% does not necessarily mean additional classroom space is required. It may also mean that the existing instructional space is smaller than the Ministry of Education standard.
Prairie Valley School Division General Instruction Utilization by School 2008

120%
112%
110% General Instruction Utilization (Enrolment / Capacity)

90%
98%
90%
80%
70%
70%
66%
60%
51%
50%
40%
Lumsden Elementary School South Shore School Lumsden High School Stewart Nicks School Clive Draycott School Pense School
School

120%
110%
105%
103%
100% 99%

94% 90%
90%
84%
80%
80% 75% 70% 68%
70%
60%
55%
50%
40%
Greenall White City High School School Vibank School Robert Southey School Balgonie Elementary School McLean School Cupar School Pilot Butte Milestone School School (K to 4) Sedley School Edenwold School Milestone School (5 to 12)
School

120%
114%
110%
99% 95% 90%
General Instruction Utilization
100%
90%
87% 80%
80%
78%
70%
67% 61%
60%
58%
56%
55% 51%
50%
40%
C .S . Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol ol tr eS ch o ta ry Sc Sc ho o en ta le y El e m ry l
H ig h
bl in
ry
en ta ry
H am
un ity
W ol se le
El em
El em
om
V al
el le
es
sC
C om m
In di an
ea d
m an
Q u' A pp
th
ca rr e
or
Ja
on tm
El e
ea d
le y
Is
In di an
tF ox
Ba l
D r.
Fo rt
Be r
School
General Instruction Utilization is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment divided by the general instruction classroom capacity of a school. Utilization over 100% does not necessarily mean additional classroom space is required. It may also mean that the existing instructional space is smaller than the Saskatchewan Ministry of Education standard.
N or
th
al
Li pt on
un ity
ig h
er
ig h
m en
el lih
ta
ig h
en
ar

120%
110%
104%
90%
87% 80%
80%
70%
70%
60%
60%
50%
45% 45%
40%
Kipling School (K to 3) Grenfell Elementary School Kipling School (4 to 12) Whitewood School Grenfell High School Broadview School Kennedy Langbank School
School
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment For All Schools 2008
60%
54%
50%
46% 43%
Facility Condition Index Total Rating (2008)
42% 41% 40%
40%
39%
FACILITY CONDITION INDEX GOOD: 0% TO 5% FAIR: 6% TO 15% POOR: 16% TO 29% VERY POOR: 30% AND HIGHER
34% 34%
30%
20%
29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 9%
10%
8% 8%
7%
6%
5% 5%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
School
The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the relative condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the relative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to prevent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies. FCIs are calculated annually, using the most recent available data.
Prairie Valley School Division Facility Condition Assessment by School 2008

60%
Facility Condition Index Total Rating 50%

43%
40%
30%
28% 23%
20%
16% 14%
10%
7%
0%
Pense School Clive Draycott School Stewart Nicks School South Shore School Lumsden Elementary School Lumsden High School
School

60%
54%
50% Facility Condition Index Total Rating
41%
40%
28% 27% 24% 24% 23% 19%
30%
20%
11%
10%
8%
8% 6%
0%
Milestone School (5 to 12) Edenwold School Vibank School McLean School Milestone School (K to 4) Sedley School Cupar School Balgonie Elementary School Robert Southey School Greenall Pilot Butte High School School White City School
School

60% Facility Condition Index Total Rating 50% Facility Condition Index Total Rating
40%
34% 34% 29% 27% 26% 25% 24%
30%
23% 21%
20%
13% 10%
10%
5% 5%
0%
Sc ho ol .S . Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol oo l oo l Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc ho ol Sc h Sc h ar Sc y ho ol C
bl in
on tm ar tr e
el lih er
ig h ty H In di an H ea d
El em en ta ry
El em
V al le
om
ea d
om m un i
W ol se
le E
Ja m es
es C
r. Is m an
u' A pp el
N or t
In di an
le y
al
rr
Ba lc a
or th
rt
School
Be r
Fo
tF
ox
El e
m en ta ry
Li pt on
m un ity
ig h
en ta ry
ig h
H ig
am
le y
le m
en t

60% Facility Condition Index Total Rating 50%
46%
42%
40% 39%
40%
30%
26% 22%
20%
10%
9%
0%
Grenfell High School Kipling School (4 to 12) Whitewood School Grenfell Elementary School Kipling School (K to 3) Broadview School Kennedy Langbank School
School
STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN CAPITAL PLANNING PRINCIPLES
VISION STATEMENT
The Vision for the Strategic Facilities Plan is a 20 Year Facility Renewal Plan which will accommodate changing demographics and educational programming initiatives in fully modernized facilities in an equitable and financially sustainable framework.
STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN CAPITAL PLANNING PRINCIPLES
STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLANNING PRINCIPLES
Maximize the potential to implement the Divisions Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) in the Strategic Facilities Plan For specialty educational programs and facilities, maximize educational programming opportunity in an accessible location using regional or magnet concepts Maximize the capability to accommodate existing and projected enrolment and educational programs in the facility Carefully manage the Divisions capital expenditures and adequately fund ongoing maintenance, operational, and minor upgrading costs
PROPOSED FACILITY RENEWAL PLAN MAJOR MODERNIZATIONS / ADDITIONS / NEW SCHOOLS

Grade Configuration
PK to 12 9 to 12 7 to 12 4 to 12 5 to 12 PK to 8 K to 12 PK to 12 K to 12 K to 6 K to 6 PK to 6 K to 12 K to 12 K to 6 7 to 12 K to 8 7 to 12

Grade Configuration
School
Balcarres Community School Greenall High School Grenfell High School Kipling School (4 to 12) Milestone School (5 to 12) New White City Area School Vibank School Whitewood School Broadview School Dr. Isman Elementary School Edenwold School Grenfell Elementary School Lipton School Montmartre School North Valley Elementary School North Valley High School Pense School Wolseley High School
Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10
School
Balgonie Elementary School Clive Draycott School Cupar School Indian Head High School James Hamblin School Kelliher School Lumsden Elementary School McLean School Sedley School South Shore School Stewart Nicks School Bert Fox Community High School Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary C.S. Indian Head Elementary School Kennedy Langbank School Kipling School (K to 3) Lumsden High School Milestone School (K to 4) Pilot Butte School Robert Southey School White City School
Scope of Major Modernizations: Comprehensive upgrading of mechanical and electrical systems. Building envelope rejuvenation, including roofing, windows, doors. Major interior finish retrofit, including specialty program spaces.

Grade Configuration
K to 8 K to 8 PK to 8 K to 8 K to 8 9 to 12
School
Pense School Clive Draycott School Lumsden Elementary School South Shore School Stewart Nicks School Lumsden High School
Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping 6 to 10 10 to 15 10 to 15 10 to 15 10 to 15 15 to 20

Grade Configuration
9 to 12 5 to 12 PK to 8 K to 12 K to 6 K to 8 K to 12 K to 8 K to 8 K to 4 K to 8 K to 12 K to 8
School
Greenall High School Milestone School (5 to 12) New White City Area School Vibank School Edenwold School Balgonie Elementary School Cupar School McLean School Sedley School Milestone School (K to 4) Pilot Butte School Robert Southey School White City School
Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 6 to 10 10 to 15 10 to 15 10 to 15 10 to 15 15 to 20 15 to 20 15 to 20 15 to 20

Grade Configuration
PK to 12 K to 6 K to 12 K to 12 K to 6 7 to 12 7 to 12 7 to 12 K to 9 K to 12 8 to 12 PK to 7 PK to 6
School
Balcarres Community School (A) Dr. Isman Elementary School Lipton School Montmartre School North Valley Elementary School North Valley High School Wolseley High School Indian Head High School James Hamblin School Kelliher School Bert Fox Community High School Fort Qu'Appelle Elementary C.S. Indian Head Elementary School
Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping 1 to 5 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 6 to 10 10 to 15 10 to 15 10 to 15 15 to 20 15 to 20 15 to 20
(A) Existing Board approved phased major modernization project

Grade Configuration
7 to 12 4 to 12 PK to 12 K to 12 PK to 6 K to 8 K to 3
School
Grenfell High School Kipling School (4 to 12) Whitewood School Broadview School Grenfell Elementary School Kennedy Langbank School Kipling School (K to 3)
Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping 1 to 5 1 to 5 1 to 5 6 to 10 6 to 10 15 to 20 15 to 20
COMMENTS
We value your comments! Please submit your comments on the sheets provided tonight, in the box provided, or by Monday, March 30, 2009 by mail, fax, or email to:
BY MAIL: Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec c/o Bron Nurkowski Stantec 301 1919 Rose Street Regina SK S4P 3P1 BY FAX: 604-696-8100 BY EMAIL: Hugh.skinner@stantec.com

APPENDIX B PUBLIC INFORMATION OPEN HOUSE COMMENTS April 15, 2009
APPENDIX B PUBLIC INFORMATION OPEN HOUSE COMMENTS
204
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional.
17
k-.1
e
11,i Go
"":1-
t_A-p Gin )4.
k 7 (1,,0 /
firct ,0_,Q Q._
au_
1it
o
4-4

NAME:
(optional) t (optional)
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING:
LaoctditADDRESS: f; )0 f l f)
(optional)
1,41(
101 6Je
IN GRADES: (optional)
4=-6
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hugh. skinner stantec. corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional. /-/ (ihr)A /0 all, J/ -1,44-4 4 0 Midi 4,444 0/. ; ".iv7 Alktal I A ,1412,01 (24, ecY) 10 A /I AL /LP d
ripe) m 04.1/7,012/ _cy,
A /144)elit:011,0 t a.40 Aw.li 01-Or 01, .41414 -4/;;,) cnV 4160.0..
Ai
.0 (1-1109- /100 /
cprpole
NAME:
M.rel
ADDRESS: r(); les \-rne.
(optional) (optional)
(optional)
0e/10 /al l
/h9.6
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hudh.skinner@stantec.com Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
Stantec

FA diY4 ,1/4)
C* s of
tObil,,i) 17 1
otiD
T. tiNLI
IKPIWANEO )f,13 6 i 1 9
wouco 13-5, b..- i.it-trs1) Rry-hcavg),r,k.

Al A..-f2110-111iii
NAME:
....11Y) ADDRESS: 13w( '330 MILYAR
(optional)
3u GI, 31_0

NI:5M
F. OA
1)
(1/
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hugh.skinner@stantec.com Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional. / e .
rif3l-- A 7
ef/
6-0/
e6-1 .
6.tia610,?(/
tfr e7e.,{} eti '77/17- 1 % e..a CC 7 077-'7 ,,Zoe6e.; / e.1 -7 dv."....4e.f...-711-' 61/1 4 e4-e NAME: ADDRESS:
ef
el/ece-ede
(optional)
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hugh.skinner@stantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are ri,vided optional.
0 h eir' 0v s
crei4 )1)-)
cd)
be
OCtAlpie
he.r: essa,-(4 or 3
1,11Y1,1LC,S
etelp vg s
r
771 e, raj t or c rpotk `iA n
Gial I.A..114
(-um_ -11) 1:1,12 ,_ccurn.e. clet-s'sfjbvL,
-11) pr .Nor lly
rp frr 4-1
as
ou.r
a T'scrlycly
P)aA ,
Bo ;le 7-3
p/ao p.,
NAME:
eon ni Sto,' hey
ADDRESS:
<36.1/
voi
(optional)
C-1'
SCil 00 I
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: litiglislitec.com_ Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
Stantee

4/ a44,11a-, t 2/-tect,-
NAME:
(optiona7j
(optional)
ef ihml
ADDRESS:
(optional)
1:4 /414C
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: huqh.skinner@stantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional. ,1(ye /-1 /Ace- (-414d Aeff"- n fene.,7: A;, VP /Lin el a a re 3 ( inde t gf e-s,06 ( 49 of to/zed- 1'3 ; oe'lObt_) Og_ Ke r finne",
- ^
(ivez A-61 a/,,-)OP cer-r,e - here)
e(
enotie / c,a,./s4r;a,-1
r.cf-ner-t
p r/5 ceSs tA. Aave .
fl Gr-we. ,Sa cee6, 6, rp l b u 00,0
rice,-set2c17)4-re,--vitsdully ev/a/4 46 3!)ect L--/e5 c.r)f idle afiz_s 6 -/402 e. . kg.C=X -% Adz:- ez .Hkc,y7 liobv c re,?-111.s I-Crtaa co7lci Se, 67 -y-LS c,0 "AO Oar Cr,reiliucji/teSt)o/I,S , iio-f16 , ee ri ail a AA __L. reca; Z Aave .k; //' 47 tip
NAME: PAlegAiT' Cb11)66-" Jue- ADDRESS:
//z-0-76(A.
/1045)6 AI'
;,s-20fiO,
(optional)
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY
ATTENDINGA-o7ceezir
n,e,.e /A)Aa/t16 tj 06
16-/6
Oar
4 , 1,a; e old-cc 7._< a pc j
av
an
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh -S 71-60v Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: a,-)d Email: hugh.skinnerstantec.com )71 ,Sertu i9(9, Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: c% Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1./ 349 e 1-)I
-U tz
(n, ere c%
a
,s/-a--c/
1 -r e d
)eiL
cal )e_ Z17,1 /, ciecA.. tAie4,
Aiw)e
AL
tip
be-tore
377"cica.--*-,1 al 1+ 51a---ois
-kdze
Pral ne . Vca !ley

SchoOl Division
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are
14 ?
1
W-fe IVO
ttv
a4<t-
C,h.et,v( c fikyriu
67 dezio/-4-9
i&ii
74c-4-e)
acs 7 arLe
e-ei* zzec-e,r c%'ed'
4,(i
AZ-e 64r
&Ai 6,1,eertie,p4,
crdze
- D ./ A,44a7. 5Vcft,-
_tai
/letAvic&ta-/W fraf'd S'y
NAME:
(optional
4/16 449(,,,e4f ADDRESS:

(optional) / /
gyfl

(optional)
1/
Prairie r
atleSchool Division
Stant&
yokkkeoLta-Al 4.20 ('auVe cr o 1_14 s a(
)(Auk_ CrF svacE Ck_ )
AitilSir oLD NAME:

-FC
(
(optional)
Litigtho Afik; /1()AIS DRESS:
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: W . C IN GRADES: (optional) 0 ovcia

arlj 2_
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hudh.skinner@stantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
Prairie School
Stantec

PVS V .f.4)1,:tt
4.4.71 -76
/-44.472
.41fr
./.2 A.vt,AfAt.--eienie 7e-

4
Or
ae.--/e.:e 4,
nI 41
el -70ozaz-,20-7n.e.,
I/
A allA -4
/ i -iii
Aar.1,
nnn,1
rA
NAME:
ADDRESS:
(optional)
GreeNtet,l1
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: (A) C
IN GRADES: (optional) 7 k-
Stantec

JP
o d 640A2' DzAitaawd-
niwi..21,MEIMMirA/ eito,r\m-ktA
,OLOARPO -- ,
114-13Ao_ Gifu
AVV141 ADDRESS:
i "4- Caait't d(U4 (4114-A9

000 (e
G-
NAME: Ole. NOSUer
c-k l.)?c,C"-)- atif (e St , 971-)
(optional)
+- 3
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hudh.skinner stantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
oirvi. k4dc, \-1-1/Adil Vtevi2 1(34-,*(0.,-b 6Li\a, vott-e\A H +1 L-litet) e eticd/9-7A .,
-{6,--k4 CadAdv-v-\,, ) AO__LoL6t,
0-1149--vd; s,9-1/),
koet Lke. Ntvka 0A-4-44A4P-4, o,Ad cb-40,
-kotsidAat,
Stantec
COMMENTS
e c (\ 90q (11.4-5AeLlfri
titytaif
koclYzan4
c-E..);LL.3
(.MIME
--S
5 (),,-;,
i 6
(54,- 1\
(an ow
jr,4-4 tR,,,(t
fwEs .14 Ajl-E4 oSS;(91Z
iAigkc's (60/01614-s/('orleErns
cold
,3/4
4
mtAq. I !
64(11 kl)14/...
if;
A- -to ' sl'at
antg -firtek. ((etn.5 tang -(0 l-fe:i.}(1161.6e.., -41,. OVA

en '1
dat
mc.3 ? Roorrt.
Q.
beytk dats'fice4.1/1 nevi till (-Er ict_rtfyi NAME: ADDRESS:
.c
' AC wet,s
Ect. 11
c,n1 eies5
-WAS* '
(optional)
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hugh.skinner@stantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
6-S 4t) t,-) k CHA
Le J
nof
ma
vulovsld
on
able. 40
codt--,
tieki-/cc 6 1
sdiool
us
0A
4- si m ac_eco (.0c1F: i,j 1,411

6
C:-
a
+'
AC-4 ( i (0(1-1, 6 1 ;AAA
CL.
entiti 0..nt
.500.14 1.
cot LA C-i g_ckc
;734E0, +(VC(
A dex t, 0 rvteA,..\-
.8.crion
o
3oe.C.P
_ -410( &co, :NS) k ivi 6 000 (5 Vt. Ad+.
Ae.x1--ha
A I.
bAi
'I\
3-19
kets k 4
Gyct Ake) to
reCr--:4 & t:teji
por (A.14,1`
g0
ci4-c
7 am a plool
c,)
z,
n (\ 4(16 0 r
f.r`c 4a_os'ioci , 6/i>ek SO 4CA,s,t 43
"41
r1/4 fk (..(15.11
-h
rkiA,6A 6,1)Cul6;61C) '41 Crel fw--- car 64-cti,cA o CX-61/05. r
h 0 us Es
p \ariS CA:c-A; 7 1.441,^ EtictA ivtelt+ d\ fctx. ; E eft cictiv;ILSES/ Eccdi-ift o ilAS3 e 61-ci , C.k Crkk tCA- ctik:, eSA re. . cxx- kJ 'La )
(.J
---trcrka
()LS.
6-23' r \
u
I S frri4 tV-1,6 i104- 61641
iA
.
vbi Sem 1.vsj
. . tC ( : Milof 411 L. .4 6 , \ .0 Eh
/1,-5.5e.SCP4 Eld- (Oel A
il
l'
C3r1 "i
5,.)3({., A o r\ -14n f... C-Teki r-
e.:o ,s..1--7
67 1 I\ i s E21) (COAC-1-4 1 ("'I''') 1 ce-r iiCk, IAA- i_S CAE:it:Cm ; A i.. 0 & A- e-ty ckbou-+ (AO 1/4.,) A il L CfO cLet4vt CIAA 0.--I'Vd)ErS 44\Cet- 0,..ca_ 6.10,3- -.1(ip,..e. vO't A t' A-Ct evc- kil'E. ("\ .1- i \ OWL .5 'E.4' n 0 "5 Ck0C,AA9 kS a c 0/ r cote t' t n 1-if 6.1/4 i 14- WA-LI E: E,1606(0-C1, 1104. CLU Cat, .3(") ic, C 1" ; ---S. A iL .134:Jk e A4.:.:1-0,,,,, A ECL, )4-&-A-ssiKvil - 6,, ,i f +ion vs 19 Cy g iallra N- 4..C: . 1-,,, tic.. . d te. lacc-i- ci' V t:, y.,-..t-s, 6,0- -1 Ili:. 6 i , v-m3 (ead -iumpAixrer, .,(,,aca.. my . lo,s4 , 5 ,36,-,. a.i t 1, Si (-ic,\ ,w(1 'N-- fra-- (1:5- SinCt 'Ii/Vill nal.- had ef A - ricy, 174.5 / )-IVAC. kifoi 1 41( ,l -(4tE. k cji.c- frv7, Li l.C. Cii)(OLC,CiA to+ Aftti Ct. , T010\ itei c 464- il rtcyn 4:. y. g c K ( i A 0. / 5 6 : CI 11" 1-- ("? (If ACLU 61,14ezr.5 ori: z ..1,;,c4-t rvic4-2.-- cf,C. 1,,, 15 titA-Clivii ti al icz_..i' It' 4-'LS I tki4,1 0 llo .), -) c i. . ' ) k. n .5 ' , Cop-tr.lw:4iiii:it ,- 2- '.. ( .`"ji-I i. Ae. IA . , ''''S'-.4 4 bf 4 H VAL 01-- I--" t mei. q.... i ,k4 .6-i- id) 6:1 -- 3 i (,,,,,,),,(...,,, ja i t 60 .7,..c" kr, 4,,, c:biv,,,,,,,,-,,,ble.... cyt,' \.if;--3 --11061r . 0 4 ,Afl) ,\1_ 4 /. ts 7 ket,( v1 . r `,1 -5 ,Se-,i(t ckczts[14:61 I id-- 6.4 rfcia riok . (A1-}t(cu-A fq 191 0 , s. kei..,,f_J So 'cfr -1.(rc'''jr .41.-S..- \icjvi5 ac E.:..)1. i , a Er z: v 1.--,1 etari LIP t--J ict-k 0 e.- (31-1 -4(1 E -hil.i.olfrq.r:: IV r..) ..-) 1(-La.._ ill EL S EL. n (41,4c.c-s 0 V :54a I VVE-C. i 60 . i D S V-5:1'CLII'il:)16 - ' ?\I ' S6'' '11' 64 A H.. moes iN0 ...S- 4 0 1. id OCt 11/1 4,441 ..40 e lc: bt- -At. (16(11 t : 3-., . 11) C'f 0 i' ., f. itl'k ;" ( li tiei ( .)1-1.. -`4' 'IA vc: 0 r*, -,1-, .:.. 5-E.41,I V-E_ -Ott. .:111A.Q'on i(Vk i4"o ,-. 5 of ei: 4 c,.;,..st: d OES sic ifii ,,, 1 , ,J cksc..c),;,, --41c boi AC PIctior I'ly oc: 441C. cvi:c.,( c j_ 3-, 1 k A ty, Gila:s is ' iS cx_ .ft-E.(ie.,4,ckftC ) -114 % I .
,,,/
aiSr irla W Ii
4 41\ f ...folci t'4--,q,. o (Afx-k eck 41g= -6:, . 4 \ E \Rd lk C. - - l..V
.-f t-y-t..3 -k. kind, .)-r, \-1 , i /41 S(irtn..r.
ii,A-tie_off
artck
3age:0/0,1 ), asi-11.--c- ..(1,c.
ij
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional. ck re j ipticx/ 1-1Qu e- yov i nkeesi,i3 c1 4--e d jciea.
ir\l' ) 1\
Sitkoo(
L/5e
Ljk
g (A. Ic
0-11,10,-Le( ? 1-
A- 4 ioAc-e
6 0.15 on
SCI cc.re_, <

CI
S
be.+L.,0
jr-t-zcik
e_ -1-4-4. 9e-rk
fo -8
CICe./20 r0 0 5
co
c7L+ +1., L
:.27e ill
1-c
YO
C iC)--/Yr -A
re
0-1 eys-CkDo
, 7
Cjiaetyl_ ,
r) 1 . 17 i-AleC
PIZ) /
reCierSe
NAME: -e-ncia 462
-?ulL ADDRESS: 8 0
IN GRADES: (optional) ara ctO
(optional)
x.,7 ?/ gag)
Dfl
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: (;
(I
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: huqh.skinner@stantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: c/o Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
aLii r
.4cloo a re icv-l cd ,' ,7 A

ffe-f$0
, c...st ea-te.1, 6_ r00. rvk 171 a 5 0,11 . e I' e... - 54-C4Cled-S' 1-4 "F l (A) S 5 LA-to e_u a e,,--ii r e 1 e jut
e SCA/0 o /
3 vrl a re
bt .a. -7t
b cLit e-r Lk "k 1 ; y
e (urch
probItapi5
; )
19p d ekte2
) b rc kJ) --..1-1.4der,i-s- du, ir,c )(), ri n k e i-c. a 0 d ,-- - LA ea ,i i ,,, -I-1.z A olio() (
ohe road . it147.-, .
5 ch 0 0 1 3
ro (A. rn CL
i 0 -act -0)c),..1" -1--Ae .464.-o0

Ica Li) . cij e71c
1. 4. '... ear. Pa c e 4-c) V7-1 0 r)
61 Cl "liv c= 3 LA-0-- -1-5 ck cr- i v i in ) i J/
AA e.L.,_, t,r- e 5 iork 1 d
0 0 k; J A
o l- e r f ek . , ,, ;-11,-, et. f y-ty)e ,- C / civo 0 1 tom/
e-r) e-7-7
/ C-110o15 cojd
bLA
e
p (-op e-r)ci re n
,
p/ofiround5
p a r\ci
Lc
15
rxporci
ro)c-cie
yam 5+a43 erc cc u r et-t.
0 lc, IL/a y e you__ to

60/11
olon'+ +11'0K froposeci 50_19ciki;sfo,,s

at ,
soup
m
L4.1
"77 id ;Al
Pi
+ by -1-0tAla
;el a_ o p
Prairie
School Division
ey
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are ;lona
Que(41onS i o-i- in)11
sk9tAh-c-i e6t ..a/411 14-eridiki -PAWn

171.? , n 414-jon k gviitiq
reD3P S.
as
NAME:
25 (Ti(l/ UL)Ine Ciar.
ADDRESS:
3131,aL,
\41,,+e si;
(optional)
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: V)Vik,
a4y C2)
4, ie - k.
Floc.
s-14kOr0,-11.hes
a.. tea
o tm-1 0, Comrsovo Ries comv2s4op .1)eLxi bei,y proatefi

Lo ynrnui) ; 4-ies ca.\ /CA,--r
-1-D5.a-ge . (ALAI y i se ict,%, Ktiosic
4i re LiNsIt4L-t) 0 F roc0"'
1--h-f6 a rf r
. r-cr
a eziolvd I Lb ,LA P`-1/15. My I+
-7: // 1
pdy
6d- a
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional. Ferns --tnrnuttiani- Prtievilats . 1/104.4k1 frirlude_ et- piclac-fwe
_
i4
"/
D la
_04114.4
41
,.4A
. "AI
.4 n
ir. J.A_ r i
Cc.mr auk -rn (1-0__CeN appgar,h, 67, -4,1-mre -treevh 6 k)hr(e rift' ei-tiol mom- 17,6 AP;6-erlive potem,N4 epptAtt if nt,Levi bre, awl iva, eldiA 3644 3 bje.m.
l . '.4 al
A
Lad
rUZ
cat
ALge
66w, <4c01
..14
.4Ar .11
kid .1
Tortm I/omit
NAME:
1 4v,kte_
(optional)
Ton
o Fht, aoe-e-e,14201serre4 rssr es
--Gros,
ADDRESS: 1,3//616k)
n2.
ti

Ywavilie
I1,0 AO--P-A.0
ac-t f
ho 1 4 co4-4
14 K_ "
tati-va
7) i9
5011--ki
4-0 Atieold
,Late_jitaaher,
.044Aa-
C-It"1144mt. se/fur-v-0(
vna-04
4p ( 10 IP' 194)
3 0 C4_011 I) Ose,
d
-dr(u
ckw craoto4 4-Ii
ebr
pea,004- ,
9f4d5 4,42_zip6q pktoteat obt-ndedrou
ad-1014--
tka,(eaNs
151:ent
j
a
1d kr
',/i-
tetok
not- ne1)-kd-
114trf' tovardb-e44rAbcp4444 ,-; . z. j eimr 4 --ecto irkes- it)

Ail
-4> l-4 e-Jawrolc,
p.y<,tce,
Ophom
CD
etiii4teei2,r
ikk
jae
etz-(1-14-02-0
---1
or,Stint.e.
071)
14+ 46,601
01
e_orrt Wit
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional. (fa
0,3
-,s(z2ft=
erect)lace5
" LICle
cd fiDv-tht, ScA,emee
6, s hcikt co( rooms bal. ice cf-7-hc- On- (tri o+heir 1,s' e-f. 12?A, care ( cnurcege-4 f2 ft-t1;45 SO)-e4)aci f-6514- uk -occr creec;-,5 a re 1c0t) Otreers rf+)CAi
NAME: ci a..44).1
eci ADDRESS:
I (optional)
Me-0,1164 Peki-
tiohiJ-e 0
Iv
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hudh.skinner@stantec.com Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: c/o Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.

/ r ,jeI v
ht-olbner
fl
0 t-ezuk
, cell , --th D VgjA :)
s ii 0 17 21 /foas--e_c am er k-o, ) Qte beff i ciA/r7 /97e d cm,( a ce-/- 7., -i-er>9*-e e)/// dckeh, 4694-_ce ,frece,,a-/- M,c-,.5. A4 ' 1/Y - '47 5/- 0 c e a4W (-"A (2-6 1/9 Le-- rxer" k ) >ke_ keree 5-12 696A/6-1 44,/ Ae 17)40Met,5 kithe re el )/V)/4 til buvrh2 )'-e_crev---6/1/
;200 i--- ?
()DE --1-v cQ of 3 i 5 --/-Do GOe."-; met, 4 6 1- h4t0 e , iooyeet. .,22edt
# A0--
or lot 0/ age
6, a
.7/72
r5tte.
/rick)j- ahf7ii
cat,/c/
o i
etieeyone
174ef,ey94-5, VD
ceit \frlue hboh)

-edutuLA'ci
p
a,t) 5a1,
5, A pt07/her
A/D)x all va a1 .
Co
CrOLd
mnaJiumsPArer) ) Of) ,,C)
fi ; 74" ,41are -z ,\yrt e d r

cafe
Coo
C3'
ac2-61,AQ6.4t.ic
e1.3
ae)
croLecirnj.
c-ern
a,
0 Aflu aetthm
if rj
Ctt4
HQ
c col a
1,0 e) 1
--7--kahk-yott,
Prairie Valley
School Division

b7
re-) //-2-7
zew
n-e_ee- 5
0-7,1
OdtA-'Apt,_//e=
3 1/44.4..C/16..-7)
/ .
74
//-7(2-44_0/-e. 'er
4:h0
Of
11-2
c24-4/
5LeCy 01./
4 MA, It) 5 A cX aior/
4.11) r
NAME: (optional)
rte.,
ADDRESS: (optional)
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: (optional) IN GRADES: (optional) Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hudh.skinnerstantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
rain Valley
School Division

' c4,cz
(c) AAA
h -OA
^(l C1
plc
NAME: c AID
(optionai)
ciC t-r) Cd. (3--r
SS ADDRESS:
(optional)
cl
ct
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: (optional) IN GRADES: (optional)
E5
1-1- 5
ctd-Q_
(6 , 8
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hudh.skinnerstantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: c/o Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
Stantec
COMMENTS
We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional. -A9deitJaAis/ C3( M5-s90- I is .A doh--4-s
(
Odic_ cie-01:5 /1,1100a04,14--
j) /4-1-611 ir)
p /0 5
/Jos POWs -S t1-tcyvi tow diSt.tpAux,rii -ptrobtats,) cco .44).acx) c k44, -e-A"-io--tfQmc,-rtls ,- p2t).,/ yew, ...floo.41
kc -r ohm
5.hoc,-Pci
rxi
24-.6i4-.,)5 - as -40 &NI tl _Socx) _5rn a( 05
L04,0A1 09. As, 4turN
0q
oda {ca.+, rzeA &dot ( .)5
(R %)
NAME: .5c-c- ADDRESS: (optional) (optional) SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: (optional) IN GRADES: (optional) Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: huah.skinner(.stantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: do Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1. 0171,4P94,
Pel
eh
0-i-ne)
1-5
rt\c 0-1*q
1,
roMmarct.

P clack
Ge
1 11-100171qr4f
urs) Sci Is
_II aiaw_s 1'64-
(A13
hnoclen)
/3 0 ckgS cJ
aD
CsYrk.k_A ,
c_s 5:pc.c_J
of S u...Jteac,)
1-
,/c9rmodicx-S
63 4 s 9re_ (Ai- I k_o2e (-
5'o,xl Woik
Stantec
COMMENTS
,QvccAmeLO\
c iKa,
A-k-O
k\
\ n
rt
\-Q ON-d Ay_Qd L'ZiasK_.) z_451 Ckikelk0_,4LJ Li K., C cOillA40-
tod
ax,(70"7-7(./ 4i_tv5c)
NAME:
ADDRESS:
(optional)
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: IN GRADES: (optional)
Fa-C
eykLaeza- e ,
a g fib OTtca-&54--) aiD
51-CaLkOci)K._
-1--&COJ wilf-A-cAu (-C--(\,\ cl D 0lue, (AWL aapi e4) rYt6 wue,uto-tg q5./1" 1)/A - 0A-0- cif-, Wk. icu- Wit ciudAniJ 4Qpmej jedk o tifittb )1 2 go hd9 OiUeJ LA-__
(411\ j1a flYdj U/
iLks),A_Q
ojj2_
L.343-1\,.
j\o_ci,j;L
0,ANd'
6-A-0 -A-1--CIJ-3 a dttcuipc_

977-) ilcAk
4i,e,t040 vezuld ettyc (1))- u 161c)(1-4--0-yL LinZubew..c . zip--
skskicuco,
Stantec
COMMENTS
We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional
ip46//4/rdir
Ce-
/7111-7/1 v- 0(4 A,
744-1-,c
67/Zve &Ay/ >

411k.'

.4ri
+OW
(1-
(A,
Le
Adi
- AINIANSUM/Z11111111/0MINNEsire-n -
NAME:
(optional)
ADDRESS:
(optional)

(optional)
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: huqh.skinnerstantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: c/o Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
/ /2
,,/,-)., ,j, 11- 4 70 0 0 Go I/ , G v o;(-0 74-4",-- /-72:" .

a e;ica.--nc-ii--)-
,E..,/
:ce 6 /' ")-af

f ii
1 e4q. I-
ae4/e' 1 1
. <_9e--, ,
s h , , .,.S- "nt
Ar
/2,g, A9 70
778_
4
47 Ai, 4 &
t' 4-44
,.fi .e
/4/2 ?"..
/2,,7
, e ' f 0, , p-v..z. / ia-, 11/. (o-=-1 _',-
/---2v-j-ep r
/1 (91
7 24--- / ,'
/if
0-0' Vel/5 '
/ 7
al.
6 .1(-
tfe. PI P- d-t- ) se-- 17/p::5,-i .. Ma b I d-kte k ( o-)-,,i 64/1 6= 6)2e'r) ( d 0-1 a 7-a-im.. / cai--- 7 p/ / 7L. 7r p
Le. C,( of ,_ / Ads/ r-ift; -(14/ 0 7

lea ,
fre'rN7/t-f
P/Le
ha/1/11 61 40
(ad'e
rarie Valley
School Division
Stantec

J
../1
3 (3 A
(2-4
Ale)
A-e
.:,e1,77-a-eee
NAME:
ADDRESS:
(optional)
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hudh.skinner@stantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
/
IL' ,..:,1-1.tP j-- . /
---ne-of---Lf7 --
,6?..----eA
L.Lit.A.
--a.. el
J
Prairie'Valley
School Division
Stantec
COMMENTS
2 (iv ule//0re 7 4,'" 43 See rede, r ese.,43-;,y 0 40 e 7Le C-4 /1049 / 0.5.7 el /4/ Ve ok-IX Erci"4,-ri . il e/ec i 'evIcy/761-1 4 IT,t4 d A4a cifte I'M A e) IL4 04-1 t. etit kJ (6-c44) A0 ro.fev74am
627
717,,
GtJ ox 7`,3-/
07'e aced(
NAME:-Dt 3G-
11.041,1
(optional)
1CCIP5 ADDRESS: (optional)
111
5 Dees/
ertraiely
ictiegiVb
6 (de"? 'tar r-
SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: (optional)
1114- 5-'14-0e4
04
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: hugh.skinnerstantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1.
Pm le VaHey
School Division-
Stantec

We value your comments on the Prairie Valley School Division's Strategic Facilities Plan and this Public Information Open House Please provide your comments below. Use the reverse side of this sheet for comments if required. Name, address, school(s), children are currently attending, & grade information are optional. //e4 2 et / / fi 64c -47 210/ '7ive415'S a'
'le /f-eW
A 2
17 ""';)
e ZZ:5- teity2aPee,e 7,4Xae-; 2) V'7,77/1.a,5/1-0',"!1
64.31/441)
/-4t,
a
'774
d o,110S/g1)--
4 / 7?ar-i a/ AS/ '71
el#77jhe
71./ "747-4,?,
<,Y, VZ "&/ "X1"

ex:7
Itcre -41 &7/,71 / ), -a 14 24,
sk_Z
NAME:
-le/4
ADDRESS:
(optional)
Zap

SCHOOL(S) CHILDREN ARE CURRENTLY ATTENDING: IN GRADES: (optional)

//
z/if
Comments may also be submitted in writing by Monday, March 30, 2009 to Hugh Skinner, Associate, Stantec, to: Email: huqh.skinnerstantec.corn Fax: 604-696-8100. Mail: clo Bron Nurkowski, Stantec, 301 -1919 Rose Street, Regina SK S4P 3P1. 7,07...A, p4A--
44,--e)7
".e47,2 4
%p
7445-A;ris
Strategic Facilities Plan Appendix C: Historical and Projected Enrolments By School / By Grade / By Year
Strategic Facilities Plan Administrative Procedures
Strategic Facilities Plan Facilities Capital Planning Procedures
1.0 Purpose: The purpose of the Facilities Capital Planning Procedures are to enable the effective capital planning of facilities within Board Policy. 2.0 Background: The Board has adopted amendments to Board Policy related to capital planning, related to Vision and planning principles. The Facilities Capital Planning Procedures administratively enable the Boards vision and planning principles to be achieved within an administrative framework. 3.0 Vision: The vision for the Board is a Strategic Facilities Plan with a 20 Year Facility Renewal Plan which will accommodate changing demographics and educational programming initiatives in fully modernized facilities in an equitable and financially sustainable framework. 4.0 Strategic Facilities Planning Principles: The strategic facilities planning principles of Prairie Valley School Division are: To maximize the potential to implement the Divisions Strategic Plan (Continuous Improvement Plan) goals in the Strategic Facilities Plan, including: o o o o High Literacy and Achievement. Equitable Opportunities. Smooth Transitions. System Accountability and Governance.
For specialty educational programs and facilities, to maximize educational programming opportunity in an accessible location using regional or magnet concepts, including: o Coordinating the 20 Year facilities renewal plan strategy with the Divisions Practical and Applied Arts Review to maximize the utilization of specialized instructional spaces, and minimize their capital and operating costs. Initiating regional or magnet concepts for educational programs and related facilities as part of the proposed modernization of facilities. Evaluating the impacts of the Pre-Kindergarten and day care initiatives and potentially accommodate these proposed programs and services within the principles and objectives of the Strategic Facilities Plan.
o o
To maximize the capability to accommodate existing and projected enrolment and educational programs in the facility, including: o Identifying additional space needs based upon enrolment growth and overcrowding and determine additional space requirements in terms of additions and / or new schools.
Strategic Facilities Plan Facilities Capital Planning Procedures

o Where required, developing Division-based space standards, capacity, and utilization rates to more accurately reflect Division-based educational programming, staffing, and space utilization. Formalizing a process and procedure to identify, and potentially decommission space, based upon: a. current programs; b. Division staffing; c. Ministry capacity and utilization formula; and d. Division-based space standards, capacity, and utilization.
To carefully manage the Divisions capital expenditures and adequately fund ongoing maintenance, operational, and minor upgrading costs, including: o Maximizing the potential for Ministry of Education capital funding for new space and for major modernizations. o Optimizing Division capital funding on facilities in good condition, and / or with low utilization rates, to emergent essential health and safety issues. o Limiting the Divisions capital funding on modernizations or additions for specialty instructional spaces unless the project will have adequate Ministry of Education capital funding. o Continuing with the Divisions program of energy upgrade projects to facilities.
5.0 20 Year Renewal Plan / 5 Year Groupings: The general principle of capital planning for major modernizations of all schools, is by 5 year increments, within the 20 year renewal plan. The five year groupings for major modernizations, shall be subject to annual review of enrolment projections, the facility condition index, and emergent Saskatchewan Ministry of Education capital funding.
Strategic Facilities Plan Facilities Decommissioning Procedures
1.0 Purpose: The purpose of the Facilities Decommissioning Procedures are to enable the efficient space utilization of facilities that meets educational program requirements as well as minimizing facilities operation and maintenance costs. 2.0 Background: Prairie Valley School Division has limited facilities maintenance and operations funding and a range space utilization in school facilities. 3.0 Factors / Criteria: The factors that will be taken into consideration in identifying potential surplus space in a school facility, will include: 3.1 facilities maintenance and operating costs; 3.2 provincial government general instruction utilization and weighted utilization of the school facility; 3.3 use of each instruction space in the school facility, including percentage of use on a weekly and / or monthly basis; 3.4 type of instructional space, particularly specialized facilities for educational program requirements (e.g. shops, labs, etc.); 3.5 community use; 3.6 location and distribution of mechanical, plumbing & electrical systems; 3.7 number and location of access doors; 3.8 current and projected enrolment, staffing, and educational programs. 4.0 Process: The Facilities Manager will: 4.1 notify the Director of Education of a school facility that is proposed for improved space utilization, and potential decommissioning of space. 4.2 meet with the school principal to: 4.2.1 review the Divisions Facilities Decommissioning Procedures; 4.2.2 document room and space utilization; 4.2.3 share the provincial government general instruction utilization and weighted utilization; 4.2.4 document historical and projected enrolment; 4.2.5 document community use; 4.2.6 document current & projected educational programs; 4.2.7 document current and project staffing; 4.2.8 share information on the location and distribution of mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems; 4.2.9 document the number and location of access doors; 4.2.10 discuss improved space utilization and potential decommissioning space options. 5.0 Report and Decision: The Facilities Manager will: 5.1 prepare a Facility Decommissioning Space Report, including documentation: 5.1.1 factors and criteria; 5.1.2 process;
Strategic Facilities Plan Facilities Decommissioning Procedures

5.1.3 options, and an evaluation of the options; 5.1.4 recommendations. 5.2 present the Facility Decommissioning Space Report to the Director of Education for review and approval. 5.3 communicate to the school principal the outcomes of the Report and the timing of implementation.

Strategic Facilities Plan

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Strategic Facilities Plan

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Strategic Facilities Plan

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN

Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

Chapter 1 Background and Purpose

FORT QUAPPELLE LEMBERG NEUDORF

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

Chapter 2 Division Assessment

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION HISTORICAL HEADCOUNT ENROLMENT

8,752 8,614 8,476 8,287 8,094 8,159 8,123

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

Utilization Range 110% or higher 101% to 110% 90% to 100%

Utilization Title Exceed Guidelines Slightly Above Guidelines Meets Guidelines

Utilization Range 80% to 89% 60% to 79% 59% or Lower

100% General Instruction Utilization

100% 99% 99% 98% 95% 94%

General Instruction Utilization (Enrolment / Capacity)

90%90%90% 87%87% 84%

80% 80%80% 78% 75%

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

6% to 15%. 16% to 29%.

30% and higher.

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

Facility Condition Index Total Rating (2008)

Facility Condition Index Total Rating

42% 41% 40%

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

Chapter 3 Vision and Strategic Planning Principles

DIVISIONS STRATEGIC PLAN CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN - VISION STATEMENT

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLANNING PRINCIPLES

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLANNING CRITERIA

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

Chapter 4 Division Facility Renewal Plan

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

PRAIRIE VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION 20 YEAR FACILITIES RENEWAL PLAN

Capital Plan Year by 5 Year Grouping 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 11 to 15 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20 16 to 20

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

Chapter 5 Public Consultation

FORMAT AND PROCESS

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

STRATEGIC FACILITIES PLAN

Chapter 6 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

FACILITIES PLANNING VISION STATEMENT BOARD POLICY

CAPITAL PLANNING PRINCIPLES BOARD POLICY