Project Grading Rubric

A Work 100%90% Excellent Exemplary Extraordinary

INPUT Planning -research -problem solving -explored choices -originality -innovation -creativity -critical thinking -material selection -preliminary sketch -working drawing PROCESS Safety -awareness -glasses, clothing, etc -hand tools -portable power tools -stand alone machines Student used research, problem solving and critical thinking to generate many original and innovative ideas. Several preliminary sketches were used to produce a final set of working drawings.

B Work 89%-80% Fantastic Fabulous Fine

Student did some research, attempted to problem solve and use critical thinking to generate original thought. A preliminary sketch was used to produce a final working drawing.

C Work 79%-70% Average Adequate Acceptable

Student relied on other students research, lacked original ideas and relied on other students sketches and plans to produce a final working drawing.

D Work 69%-60% Poor Pitiful Paltry

Student did not do any research, used readyto-use plans from instructor or other source and required step-by-step instruction.

F Work 59%-0% Unsatisfactory Unacceptable Unfinished

Student showed no evidence of having done any planning.

Student worked safely, looked for unsafe conditions and reported them.

Student was aware of his/her own safety and reminded others to be safe.

Student was aware of his/her own safety and worked safely around others.

Student committed unsafe actions and was unaware of his/her need for safety.

Student was unaware of his/her own safety and committed unsafe actions in relation to others.

OUTPUT Craftsmanship -knowledge -quality -detailing -neatness -accuracy

The project was free of error. Additional effort or time could not have made it better. All components fit together perfectly. The student exhibited master-level knowledge.

The project had slight apparent errors. With additional time or effort, it would have been perfect. Some components are misaligned. The student exhibited journey-level knowledge.

MODIFICATION -functional testing analysis -troubleshooting -evaluation -demonstrated learning

Student made modifications throughout the entire process. Student applied knowledge from prior projects to improve this one.

Student made some changes during production. Student used prior experience to adjust current project.

The project had apparent errors that should have been fixed. Great patience and care was needed in production, construction and assembly to improve fit and finish. The student exhibited apprentice-level knowledge. Student made modifications only in the final stage. Student did not apply knowledge from prior experience to foresee problems.

The project had many errors and showed lack of pride. Components do not fit well together. Lack of time and effort has produced a shoddy project. The student exhibited minimal entry-level knowledge.

The project was incomplete, nonfunctional or unassembled. Components did not fit. Laziness, apathy or absenteeism resulted in an inferior product. The student exhibited lack of knowledge and understanding. Student made no effort to modify project, with apparent errors showing during the process and after project completion.

Student disregarded errors and attempted to make modifications only after the project was complete.

RESPOSIBILITY Work habits -attendance -punctuality -preparedness -organization -self-starting -on-task -effort -attitude -cooperation -helpfulness -clean-up effort

Student began work right away, was always on task, worked hard and had a positive attitude. Showed willingness to help others and was respectful.

Student was enthusiastic, always prepared, followed through on assignments, showed a great deal of effort, helped others in cleaning up and was pleasant.

Student was on time, was organized and prepared, did his/her own work without bothering others and cleaned up after himself.

Student started late, was frequently unprepared, was off task on occasion, did the minimum to get by and let others clean up.

Student was tardy or absent often, was seldom on task, bothered other students, was uncooperative or rude and made a substantial mess that others had to clean up.

Project Grading Rubric

A Work 100%90% Excellent Exemplary Extraordinary
INPUT Planning -research -problem solving -explored choices -originality -innovation -creativity -critical thinking -material selection -preliminary sketch -working drawing PROCESS Safety -awareness -glasses, clothing, etc -hand tools -portable power tools -stand alone machines

B Work 89%-80% Fantastic Fabulous Fine

C Work 79%-70% Average Adequate Acceptable

D Work 69%-60% Poor Pitiful Paltry

F Work 59%-0% Unsatisfactory Unacceptable Unfinished

OUTPUT Craftsmanship -knowledge -quality -detailing -neatness -accuracy

MODIFICATION -functional testing analysis -troubleshooting -evaluation -demonstrated learning

RESPOSIBILITY Work habits -attendance -punctuality -preparedness -organization -self-starting -on-task -effort -attitude -cooperation -helpfulness -clean-up effort