000181

mALL1
M W lW
m ?
l^I4 JZ
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
THEM IC[PAL COURT OF THE CITY OF RENO
CITY OF R 0,
Plaintif
.
v .
ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN,
Defendant.
1
SU SPO TE OrWEll DE fl G RELIEF OUGHT IN IM1)ROPER DOC ME IT
On March 7. 2012, at I :58 p.m., defendal1l Zachary Barker Coughlin, an attorey and
seltrepresel1led litigant in the instant traffc citation case, began fax-filing a 224-pagc
document to the Reno Municipal Court purporting 10 seek various and sundry types of relief
fTom this court on a "Boul
'
vard SlOp" traffc citation matter. He labeled his do ument ,
.
otice
C
of Appeal of Summary COl1lempt Order; Motion to Return Personal Property Confiscated by
Reno Municipal ourt and Its Marshals; Motion for New Trial and to Alter or Amend
Summary COl1lempt Order.' Said document was filed by the Clerk of the Court. after much
di ruption to the court's operations.
The court herein issues this Order slIa sponte to prcvel1l the plaintiff, Reno CilY
Altorney. from devoting any additionaltimc or resource to this documelH, and to relieve the
plaintif from any burden of attempting to respond to said document. Likewise. the court staf
is relieved of any obligation to frther deal with this aberrant document.
The court tinds that lhe defendant has failed 10 fol l ow proper legal procedure in
preparing and filing a Notice of Appeal, or Illotion Wilh appropriate citation to the record. lhe
facts and the applicable law. and argument thereof. and has blatantly abused the COUrt
'
s fax-
filing process offered for the convenience of parties appearing in this court. Furthermore, the
000182
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I I
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2 1
22
23
24
2'
26
27
28
R
M N11
?M W l%
^
0J 1I1 IJ
document filed by Mr. Coughlin appears to contain a eries of disjointed legal rambling
plucked from online resources that are neither relevant nor applicable to the matters in this case.
I IS ORERED that any and all relief sought by the defendant Zachary Barker
Coughlin in the above-described document is denied; at such time as Mr. Coughlin fles a
correct and proper motion or notice, his legal document will be considered by the coun.
IT IS F RTHER ORDERED that Zachary Barker Coughlin shall refrain from, and i
hereby barred and prohibited from faxing any documents to Reno Municipal Coun.
IT I ALSO ORDERED that if Zachary Barker Coughlin wishes 10 file documents in
Reno Municipal C011 on any matter assigned to Department 3. he must present signed
originals only. in appropriate legal form and format. limited to no more than 15 pages in length.
and before they are fled. the clerk of the coun shall present them to this coun for review in
chambers. and this coun will make a pre-fling detemlination iflhey can be filed by the clerk.
IT r 0 ORDERED
Dated thi 13th day of March, 20 12.
2
T
Reno Municipal Judge
000183
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Reno MunIpal Cour
Dot NasI Holmes.
Judge
" 0 Box 1900
eno, NV 89505
775) 33822
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of the Reno Municipal
Cour, Reno, Nevada, that I am over the age of 18 years and not a pary to the above
action, and that on this date, sered a true and correct copy of the attached document
to the following as set forh below:
Allison Ormaas
Deputy City Attorney
PO Box 1900
Reno NY 89505
Zachary Barker Coughlin, Esq,
1422 E. 9
"
Street #2
Reno NY 89512
X Placing said document in a sealed envelope and placed for collecting and
mailing by Unites States mail in Reno, Nevada, postage prepaid following ordinary
business practices.
Washoe County Jail
Court Serices
Facsimile (FFAX)
Electronic Mail (E-mail)
Inner-office mail following ordinary business practices
Personal Delivery.
DATED: March 13, 2012.