Danny on Private and Public, Trusts etc.

I've been listening on the call now for the last 45 minutes 15 minutes or so, I should be getting' in bed because I have to get up early in the morning, but I've been listening to you folks talk and.there is a lot of things that I agree with what you are saying, some things I don't agree with, such as take it all out of trust, you don't want it in trust, if it isn't in trust, you don't want to be the controller of the trust, cause you don't have any remedy, but that, that's wrong. If you have somebody that is administrating the trust, he is the trustee. He is answerable solely to the beneficiary. The beneficiary is the only one that can bring a claim against the trustee. The Trustee cannot bring a claim against the beneficiary, because what is he going to complain about, that he is not doing his

job for the beneficiary? So exactly, what George was about to say, when you come into court, the plaintiff comes in, and it's always against the defendant, and even though it is not expressed as such, basically what you have going on there is a trust. The plaintiff would be the beneficiary, the defendant would be the trustee, 90% of the time, the plaintiff get's everything that he wants, as long as he is able to prove his claim. (I'm ignoring the legally incompetent person speaking at this moment as it's irrelevant to the meat of this transcript) The Grantor grants the trust, unless he establishes some rights for himself, he has nothing to do with it, it's up against the trustee, and the beneficiary. (more gibberish from the incompetent public)

RE Trustee, He is already going to be responsible for it, 'cause he is with the duty to administer the trust, answerable solely to the beneficiary. The Trustee is with the duty, the beneficiary is with the right. The reason we don't get any "remedy", which I don't want in the first place, I don't want remedy, I want relief. Remedy is statutes and codes, remedy is under law, it's lawful. So, sitting here talking about how we are operating in the private, we need to operate from the private, and then go over and study their statutes and codes, you are stepping right back into the public. You are stepping back into their realm. Our power, our power is in the private. If you want private, then start operating through private trusts. Start getting these guys that are sending you bills everyday, into a private agreement. You start off

number one buy doing a debt validation with them. You want them to validate the debt. The won't! and this is the one time that I will talk about in this process, using something like statutes and code. and that is UCC9-210, A4. That is the debt validation, you send the debt validation off to them and they have 14 days as per that code, that statute, under UCC, to respond, and when they don't respond, now you have shifted the unclean hands from you as the debtor, to them, because they did not respond and validate and authenticate the debt. Now when you go into court, if you created records of this, you are going to be able to show, how the burden of proof has shifted to them, because he who comes into equity wants to come in with clean hands. I don't want common law either, OMG why did he say that?.because common law is ruled and governed by equity. Equity is

the soul and the spirit of the law. I have a quote here for you to back up what I am saying. I've given you an NOI, a notice of interest, that equity is higher than common law, that is the soul and the spirit of the law, now let me give you an SOI, a statement of interest, baking this up, this is proof. The following quote is from American, or Institute of American Law, 1882, by John Bouvier. "Law is nothing without Equity and equity is everything even without law. Those who perceive what is just and what is unjust only through the lies of law never seen as well as those who behold it with the eyes of equity. Law may be looked upon in some manner as an assistance for those who have a weak perception of right and wrong, in the same way that optical glasses are useful for those who are short sighted, or those

whose visual organs are deficient. Equity in it's true and genuine meaning is the soul and the spirit of the law. Positive law is construed and rational law is made by it. " - John Bouvier. (Construe - To put together; to arrange or marshal the words of an instrument. To ascertain the meaning of the language by process of arrangement or inference. Blacks 4th) Equity is not law, equity is the soul and the spirit of the law, when Yashua was here and the whore was brought before him, I'm sorry, when the woman that committed adultery was brought before him, and the towns people wanted to stone her, he said: "ye who have not sinned, may you throw the first stone." He wasn't operating off of common law! He went against what the law of the land was which said, they get to stone her to death because she

was out doinking somebody else when she wasn't supposed to be. He was operating off of equity. and the maxim that he was using, was, "He who seeks equity, must do equity." Now, that does not mean exactly what it says. He who seeks equity, you have rights. Your substantive rights are held in equity.but you have to remember, that if you are seeking equity, you gotta do equity. You gotta remember, that the other side has rights too. If you come in as the plaintiff or you decide to come in as the beneficiary and bring the Trustee in, and make them answer for non performance of the trust, you have to remember, that the trustee has rights too, and that is what Yeshua was operating off of. He was operating off of the soul and the spirit of the law. He was operating off of equity.

and there are about 20 equitable maxims, that once one understands them, and lives by them, not only will the bible, the scriptures, speak volumes more to you, but you are also a master of the law now because positive law is construed and rational law is made by it. If you have the 20 equitable maxims, under your belt, because they are the proof that need no proving, that's out of Henry R. Gibson's book, "A Practical Treatise on Suits and Chancery", he was a chancery lawyer in 1907 in our country, when you start operating off of those you can kiss those 64 million statutes and codes goodbye. Why? because number 1, they are on the public side, you don't want to co-mingle and go over to the public side, you want to stay in the private. You want to use your straw-man, you want to use your Grantor, because Grantor is going to be the straw-man, that you're going to

use, and everyday when you go out here and you buy gas or you buy groceries or whatever else you buy, you are forming a relationship. (Chancery - equity; equitable jurisdiction; a court of equity; the system of juris prudence administered in courts of equity. Blacks 4th.) You can't have a contract today, 'cause there is no lawful money, there is no valuable consideration to give in order to complete the contract, so what happens, now you have a void in that contract, what rushes in to fill that void? A trust, because you do not have to have consideration in order for a trust to be formed. Trust is formed over a res, over an interest in a thing, it could be tangible or intangible. So, everyday when you go out here and you buy gas, you're forming a trust, you buy groceries, you're forming a trust, we have

formed literally thousands of trusts in our lifetime.but they are not expressed as trusts! (Ed note: implied vs. expressed trust, learn the difference, it's key! We are basically thrust int the world and have to learn it for ourselves.) That's why I was asking earlier if you could show me something, that the 14th amendment is actually a trust. He who claims trust, must prove trust. (Ed note: as in our security agreement, and secured transaction!) So if you go into court, and you say, oh I am the beneficiary, number one, the court cannot be recognized at law, which is the public side of the court, you have to go in to the exclusive inherent equity jurisdiction, which is the private side. Now, there is statutory equity, a look a like, they had taken everything that we

had in the republic, and they've made a mirror image of it, backwards. If you think about it, we started off this great country in a republic. Republic comes from res and publica, thing and public, the public thing. Everybody, that is what made it so beautiful is because we could actually have perfect title, alodial title, or full title, whatever you want to call it, back at that timewe were the true owners of our stuff, we truly owned our land. We were, it was a public government, everybody that was in the public, but they were private inside that public. They were able to walk around as true men, as true women, under Yahweh, under Yashua, and express themselves as such. Then we had a problem it was that little bankruptcy, uh and in 1871, when they created a private government. Ok, so now if you take a great big circle, if you take and draw a great big circle in your mind,

that's the republic, now draw another great big circle inside of that first circle, now you have that private U.S. corporation, and that's where the whole expatriation and all that bull crap came in, because they were trying to get these guys inside of that private corporation, alright? Now were talking about being private, but we're inside of a private corporation, because wether we like it or not, we have not created any records to prove that we are not that 14th amendment citizen!, that we are not that straw-man. So we ARE actually private, but we are now talking about the difference right now between private and public. (Ed note: hence the private trust that needs to be created to prove that we can hold the res and are legally competent to operate it in the public, in her but not of

her, get it? Anything else will not show that you are legally competent enough to hold the res privately in the public, believe me I got the bumper sticker, the t-shirt and the road rash on that one!) So inside those two first big circles you are going to draw two more circles! The third circle is going to be the public, the U.S. citizens the straw-men, inside of that private corporation, and inside that fourth circle, is going to be where the real man and real woman are at right now, in the very centre, talkin about the private, and if you look at that, that's the mirror image of what we had. Ok?! So where's the remedy Dan, you're going off on all this crapwhere's the remedy? The remedy is knowing and understanding public vs. private. Quit studying all that statutes and codes and quit worrying about those bonds, as you

guys have said, because we don't have the authority to create the bonds number one, number two, you go out here and start creating bonds, what are you doing? You are creating more debt, your putting more of a burden on our fellow American brothers and sisters, and you're making the national debt bigger, blah blah blah blah blah blah. So what do we do? We have to extinguish the debt. If all of this created, is trust, we know it's trust, but we don't have the records, we haven't created the records, and they aren't treatin' it as trust, WE have to do so. We have to create the records of everything we do, from assigning titles to them, to merging the titles and extinguishing the debt, because that's the whole point of the trust, is they bifurcate the title. They split it in two. They split one as the legal title and the

other is the equitable title. Next time you look at the certificate of title for your truck, say hello to the legal title! We don't want legal titles! That makes us trustee! Only the trustee has legal titles,the beneficiary, the one who is not recognized at law, because that's public, the one that is recognized in the private, in the exclusive equity inherent jurisdiction, that's the equitable title, but that title is not put down on a piece of paper. There is no physical representation of that title. It's the most powerful title, but it's also the one that's not talked about! Why? because they can't see it at law! That's why we always go in here in these damn courts fighting over all the time is the legal title. That's what a land patent is. Go read, go get a copy of your land patent and read it. It says, the United States herby grants, oooooo trust term!!!, their granting some rights, but they're reserving

some rights for themselves .to said claimant.blah blah blah blah..to have and to hold. Oooooooo to have and to hold clause, that sounds kinda like a marriage.that's the habindum clause, this is, that's in the beginning of a deed where it states, they are granting you so much rights.and they lay it out inside the deed. Did you really get married? Or did you perhaps create two trusts, at the exact same time, between you and your wife? Yes the latter is true, you created two trusts at the exact same time, butthe land patent is a legal title. Everybody looks at it as being the holy grail, OMG, I want the land patent..blah blah blah.bullshit! We don't want the land patent, or maybe do get the land patent, and merge it with your equitable asset, thereby merging the two titles and

boom! say hello to perfect title. It's not allodial title, because allodial title is a common law term. Common law has been codified, it's inside the United States code now, it's statutes and codes. So we don't want to use statutes and codes terms, because that's just right back into their turf, into their law. We want to stay out of there! We want to stay on the private side. Create a private trust. Create the records for the trust. Send them, convey to them the legal title and create records of it, and when you land your butt in court, you're going to come in with either you bring them in, or they bring you in, you bring them in with a counter claim, and you are going to be able to slap 'em with all these colourable titles, which they can see at law, until you are able to get a private in camera hearing. In camera, can either be in chambers, it can be, I've been hearing

people calling it, I'll just tell the judge I'll just extinguish the debt. Well how are you going to do that???? Well, I can't tell you in this public setting judge, and he (the judge) stands up and orders everybody out of the court room, takes his robe off, that's key, that's significant, that's taking off his mask, comes over and sits down next to the guy, and they talk. He says ok, I can't talk about this anymore, he get's back up puts his robe back on, calls everybody back into the court, dismisses the case, dude goes back in to check on it a few days later, it's gone. Why, because he was talking trust, because he understands trusts, and the judge understood what he was talking about. He verbally expressed his intent, and that's key, your intent. but I've been rambling on, so and that's just it.you've

got your Uniform Trust Code too, your UTC, that's statutory. Now you have to study the statutory trust. I have a little book, you can get it on Amazon, it's called Gilberts Law Summaries, Trust, by Edward C. Halbach Jr., once you read and study that book, you're gonna be able to understand how trusts operate. A trust, is a trust, is a trust, they are just setup a little bit differently inside the indentures, which by the way, the indenture is the law of the trust, and once you prove a trust inside the court, guess which side the judge is going to rule off of? That law (Ed note: the law of indenture) Well if you sat down as Mr. Grantor, and created this indenture, you created law that the judge is going to rule off of, and punish the trustee on. Bingo, but the biggest most ultimate deal here is, everybody talks about the birth certificate being a trust, well, no it's not. It's a birth certificate, until

YOU create the records stating otherwise!!!! Once you have those records created, creating two public witnesses, now you can come in and say, it's a trust, because: he who claims, must prove. You claim it's a trust, you can prove it's a trust. (Indenture - A deed in which two or more persons are parties, and in which these enter into reciprocal and corresponding grants or obligations towards each other where a dee-poll is properly one in which only the party making it executes it. or binds himself by it as a deed, though the grantors or grantees therein may be several in number. Blcks 4th) Ok, now you've got your birth certificate, being a trust and you've got your social security trust fund. which is obviously a trust, but it's construed incorrectly. You need to do an SS5 form, to re-express it, granting them the signature, by grantor, on an SS5 when they

send you the card, you just put on, you sign it, by beneficiary, boom, now the two main, the the theforeign situs trust and the cesti qui trust, are both expressed as being trusts. Now you go into the IMF, that's the individual master file, being held by Trust 56, aka the IRS, and you order them to correct the records. Once your IMF (individual master file) is corrected and you have expressed it to the Trustee, the original spend thrift trust, which everyone calls the declaration of Independence, which has been reworked over time through the different bankruptcies, has then turned from a protective trust into a discretionary trust and the trustees have discretion on wether or not to release the benefits to the beneficiary. Yes we are the beneficiary, no were not expressed like that. That's why these guys out here in debtor/creditor land, and they do the

accepted for value bull crap, and every now and again, one of them get's thrown a bonethat does two things, number one, it keeps everyone else out there in debtor/creditor land sending in that A4V bullshit, hoping to get it, and they don't study this stuff that I'm talking about, equity and trusts, and number 2, it shows that, they have discretion on wether or not to give you the benefit. Because in a protective trust, like that, the Trustee is with the duty, that if the beneficiary is insolvent, and insolvent means, that you can't pay your debts, or maybe you have the means to pay your debts, but you just don't, that's per Blacks law, if the beneficiary is insolvent, the Trustee does not have to release the trust funds to the beneficiary. (Ed note: Correct, I would say that if the res of the trust was not captured properly, via properly drawn security agreement,

the debtor defaulting, and then the revesting to treasury, etc. that the trust was not construed properly, is what this means. Again legal competence and knowing how to apply it.) Our trust funds are being held in trust. They, being the U.S. government, (Ed note: or any government in the common wealth) all those people holding a public office, they are our Trustees, they are the ones deciding on weather or not to release these funds to us. (Ed note: This is actually not true. It's predetermined at what age you are able to get the funds and of course by your legal competence and wether or not you can keep your mouth shut, as in not casting pearls at swine!) Now if you go in and you correct all these files, in the IMF, they're going to release to you this huge lump sum, and that may be

up to 35 billion dollars. I can't prove that, so we'll just leave it at that, just maybe. I don't like to state things that I can't prove. So what happens when you get three million dollars, Wow, I've done this and I just got three million dollars?!!! What are you going to do with it? Well you better damn well extinguish it! Why, because you are reducing the national debt. You need to do that crap. We don't have to worry about money in this system. Why, because we have an unlimited amount of it. Our signature, the ultimate, one of the ultimate goals to do, is now that you have all this set up, now your going to convey to a trustee, you decide who it's going to be. Right now I'm working on a credit card company, I'm going to convey to them, my equitable asset. What is that? My signature. It has an unlimited value in this system. It's

the most important thing you own, so if you sit down and you create records and you lay this all out on a white board first before you send it out. You get this guy in agreement, number one, then you send out your trust res to him, now once he get's it and takes delivery of it, within so many days he does not disclaim the office of the trustee, the trust vests, and now in the indenture you sent along with it, you're going to order him to convert. What is convert? Convert is.you take your 5 dollar bill down to the store, and you convert it into a bottle of dishwashing soap. That's a conversion. Poof!, right before your eyes, it convert your equitable asset, if you send it to the right people, they can convert it to, ohhhh lets say to 50,000 dollars a month, on this credit card and it did every month, and it automatically goes back every month to 50,000 dollars. That's a positive amount,

not a negative you gotta pay it back, you spend 25,000, at the end of next month, bloop it comes back up to 50,000. O.K. that's completely possible, it has been done. I have friends that have extinguished the debt on their mortgage. This isn't just me talking crap, this is serious. That source, is foreign, 'cause it's non-negotiable. What does that mean, that means; when you convey that title to that Trustee, he cannot (re)convey it. It's non negotiable, he can't convey his interest in it, because every time you hear the words right, title, and interest, or if you hear them separately, most of the time they are talking about trust. So he cannot transfer his interest in that title to anybody else, it's non-negotiable. It's also, foreign to the United States, which means they cannot tax it! That's 50,000 a month, non taxable! For the real man, to be able to use, in the private, to pay for his needs,

that he needs. Now this get's a lot more deep, I'm trying to just blow through it real fast and convey that I know what I am talking about, before I go to bed. So there's a relief, not a remedy! Remedy is a privilege. Relief is lawful! Remedy is legal, Relief is lawful! Lawful and legal, public and private. You have to understand the public and private a LOT more, to stay out of the public and not comingle and not get treated like a little baby. 19:06 end (Ed note: After this there is about 10 minutes more, but it's totally irrelevant to what Danny has given us here! Thank you Danny! There is a little more that I am going to transcribe herebut after these few last tidbits.it's irrelevant)

It's the estate = trust. If you look at the word estate in blacks law dictionary, it's trust. It's how you hold your estate that is important. How are you holding it? Are you holding it as a trustee, with all the liability? Every time you get one of these bills in the mail, you're holding that liabilitythat makes you the Trustee, the Trustee's gotta pay, Trustee gotta do a duty. The people that sent the bill are the beneficiaries. Is it expressed?.no! but that's how you gotta look at it. Question: Isn't this is why we can order them to pay all our bills? ' cause they're the Trustees? Well just as soon as you correct the records and create the records. Yes mam! Question: So basically we can demand an accounting of the trust, then we can just transfer it all into a different form of trust, an express trust, and then we can control

that. After this it get's patriotic and bull crappy.not going furtheras there is nothing relevant. Blessings to whoever will read this. Create your private trust! Work from the private. Correct the records at the IRS/CRA and live! God didn't create you to be left out naked, but only those who are His are going to get this. Blessings!!!!