Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.theiia.org
Table of Contents
Page Executive Summary
Opinion as to Conformance to the Standards Objectives / Scope / Methodology IIA Standards Conformance Summary
7 45 46
Attachment B
Acronyms Used in Report
www.theiia.org
Executive Summary
Under the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards) an external quality assessment (EQA) of an internal audit activity must be conducted at least once every five years by a qualified assessor or assessment team from outside the organization. The qualified assessor or assessment team must demonstrate competence in both the professional practice of internal auditing and the EQA process. The Houston Independent School District (HISD) Board Audit Committee selected the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) to lead the review of the Office of Inspector General (Internal Audit). The review was concluded on March 28, 2013 and provides management with information about Internal Audit as of that date. Future changes in environmental factors and actions by personnel, including actions taken to address recommendations, may have an impact upon the operation of Internal Audit in a manner that this report did not and cannot anticipate. Considerable professional judgment is involved in evaluating the findings and developing recommendations. Accordingly, it should be recognized that others could evaluate the results differently, and draw different conclusions. The criteria used to determine conformance to the Standards are defined on page 36 of this report and are consistent with the guidance provided by the IIA in their Quality Assessment Manual, Sixth Edition. Opinion as to Conformance to the Standards It is our overall opinion that Internal Audit does not conform to the Standards. Does Not Conform means the assessor has concluded that the internal audit activity is not aware of, is not making good-faith efforts to comply with, or is failing to achieve many / all of the objectives of the Standards. While an Internal Audit charter is in place to establish the purpose, authority, and responsibility of Internal Audit, it is outdated and not consistent with requirements of the Standards. While Internal Audit reports functionally to the Board and administratively to the Superintendent, the nature of the functional reporting relationship is not described in the charter. The charter is not consistent with the Definition of Internal Auditing, the IIA Code of Ethics, and the Standards and is not updated periodically and approved by the Board. This is a critical element to ensure functional reporting is effective and organizational independence is achieved. Documentation of planning and preliminary risk assessment at an engagement level does not support that work is done with due professional care and IT audit resources and skills need to be evaluated. The CAE has not established, documented and maintained a Quality Assurance and Improvement Program (QAIP) that includes the required elements of internal and external assessment and communication of the results of such assessments. The annual risk assessment and audit planning process is not effective in prioritizing areas for audit. There is limited input from key stakeholders when conducting the risk assessment and developing the annual audit plan, the plan is not clearly linked with an entity-wide view of risk, and there is no linkage between audit plan objectives and supporting resource requirements. The annual audit plan is not shared with key stakeholders in the organization beyond the Board Audit Committee. Concepts of governance, risk management, and control are not specifically addressed in the audit plan. An internal audit methodology has not been specifically defined and documented for Internal Audit to ensure that infrastructure and processes are consistent with the Standards and that work can be performed efficiently, effectively, consistently, and with a high level of quality. Planning for individual engagements, supported by an engagement level risk assessment, is not defined and or documented in audit work papers. Audits are executed based upon an approved work program, but are inconsistent in terms of quality and level of documentation supporting conclusions. Audit reports could be enhanced by including recommendations for management action and by improving timeliness, especially related to E-Rate matters. There is no formal follow-up process to monitor the status of observations raised during the audit reporting process. 3
www.theiia.org
Executive Summary
Objectives / Scope / Methodology The principal objectives of the EQA were to (1) assess Internal Audit conformance to the Standards; (2) assess the effectiveness of Internal Audit in providing assurance and advisory services to the Board, senior executives, and other interested parties; and (3) identify opportunities, offer recommendations for improvement, and provide counsel to the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) and staff for improving their performance and services and promoting the image and credibility of Internal Audit. The scope of the assessment included Internal Audit, as set forth in the Internal Audit charter. Conformance criteria used were the Standards. To accomplish the objectives, the EQA team reviewed information prepared by Internal Audit at the EQA teams request, conduct ed interviews with selected key stakeholders to Internal Audit, reviewed a sample of audit projects and associated work papers and reports, reviewed benchmark and survey data, and prepared diagnostic tools consistent with the methodology established for an EQA in the IIA Quality Assessment Manual, Sixth Edition. This external quality assessment was commissioned by the Board Audit Committee and is the first external quality assessment performed for Internal Audit and which was designed to evaluate conformance with the Standards. The external quality assessment evaluated Attribute Standards that describe requirements for infrastructure supporting Internal Audit and include elements such as (1) the Internal Audit charter that is the foundational document describing the purpose, authority, and responsibility of the activity; (2) organizational placement of Internal Audit and their ability to operate independently and objectively; (3) processes and infrastructure to ensure that work is performed with proficiency and due professional care; and (4) processes to support quality and continuous improvement within Internal Audit. The external quality assessment also evaluated Performance Standards that describe management and other processes that support the actual conduct of internal audits and include (1) activities associated with managing the internal audit activity such as annual audit planning, resource management, coordination of activities with other providers of assurance, and defining the internal audit methodology; (2) the scope of internal audit including governance, risk management, and control; (3) processes for planning audit engagements; (4) processes for executing engagements; (5) processes for communicating results of engagements; (6) processes for monitoring management actions on reported observations; and (7) mechanisms to communicate the acceptance of risk by management to the Board.
www.theiia.org
Executive Summary
Detailed observations related to conformance gaps for the Standards are included on the following pages. We have provided recommendations to address each conformance gap noted. Also included are Internal Audit responses provided to us that include commitments to action and timeframes for meeting those actions. The Board Audit Committee should monitor the status of committed action until all committed actions have been completed. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to HISD. We will be pleased to respond to further questions concerning this report and furnish any desired information.
Basil Woller, CIA, CRMA Team Leader Team Members: David MacCabe, CIA, CGAP, CRMA Robert Shipway, CIA, CRMA
www.theiia.org
Attachment A
IIA Standards Conformance Summary
GC OVERALL PC DNC X 2060 2070 ATTRIBUTES STANDARDS 1000 1010 1100 1110 1111 1120 1130 1200 1210 1220 1230 1300 1310 1311 1312 1320 1321 1322 Purpose, Authority, and Responsibility Recognition of the Definition of Internal Auditing Independence and Objectivity Organizational Independence Direct Interaction with the Board Individual Objectivity Impairments to Independence or Objectivity Proficiency and Due Professional Care Proficiency Due Professional Care Continuing Professional Development Quality Assurance and Improvement Program Requirements of the Quality Assurance and Improvement Program Internal Assessments External Assessments Reporting on the Quality Assurance and Improvement Program Use of Conforms with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing Disclosure of Nonconformance X X 2430 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Managing the Internal Audit Activity Planning Communication and Approval Resource Management Policies and Procedures Coordination X X X X X X X 2431 2440 2450 2500 2600 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2100 2110 2120 2130 2200 2201 2210 2220 2230 2240 2300 2310 2320 2330 2340 2400 2410 2420 2421 Reporting to Senior Management and the Board External Service Provider and Organizational Responsibility for Internal Auditing Nature of Work Governance Risk Management Control Engagement Planning Planning Considerations Engagement Objectives Engagement Scope Engagement Resource Allocation Engagement Work Programs Performing the Engagement Identifying Information Analysis and Evaluation Documenting Information Engagement Supervision Communicating Results Criteria for Communicating Quality of Communications Errors and Omissions Use of Conducted in Conformance with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing Engagement Disclosure of Nonconformance Disseminating Results Overall Opinions Monitoring Progress Communicating the Acceptance of Risks X X NA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X NA X X X X X X X X GC PC X DNC
www.theiia.org
2. 3.
2.
www.theiia.org
4.
5.
6.
www.theiia.org
www.theiia.org
5.
6.
Confirm the organizational independence of Internal Audit to the Board on an annual basis as required by Standard 1110.
Evaluate the organizational structure of the Office of Inspector General with consideration given to the IIA Position Paper The Three Lines of Defense in Effective Risk Management and Control (January 2013). This Position Paper is strongly recommended but not mandatory professional guidance that describes the role of Internal Audit in relation to other assurance activities within an organization. The role of Inspector General responsible for investigative matters (2nd Line of Defense) and the role of CAE responsible for oversight over governance, risk management, and control mechanisms (3rd Line of Defense) may present some potential impairment for Internal Audit.
10
www.theiia.org
11
www.theiia.org
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
12
www.theiia.org
2.
3.
13
www.theiia.org
3.
4.
14
www.theiia.org
15
www.theiia.org
2.
16
www.theiia.org
2.
17
www.theiia.org
2.
2.
18
www.theiia.org
2.
The Office of the Inspector General shall communicate the results of external and periodic internal assessments upon completion of such assessments. Results must include the assessors or assessment teams evaluation with respect to the degree of conformance with the Definition of Internal Auditing, the Code of Ethics, and the Standards.
The Office of the Inspector General shall communicate the results of ongoing internal monitoring at least on an annual basis. The Board Audit Committee suggests the Office of Inspector General use the balanced scorecard approach described in the recommendation for Standard 1311 or another comparable and reliable performance measure to facilitate this communication.
3.
19
www.theiia.org
20
www.theiia.org
2. 3.
21
www.theiia.org
2.
3.
22
www.theiia.org
3.
Communicate to senior management and the Board the impact of resource limitations associated with the annual audit plan, if any.
23
www.theiia.org
1.
2. 3.
Incorporate a staffing analysis into the Annual Audit Plan to support the adequacy of resources and to determine whether the allocation of resources is done in a manner that optimizes achievement of the Annual Audit Plan as discussed in Standard 2010.
Assess the IT resource component within the Annual Audit Plan as discussed in the recommendation to Standard 1210 from both an adequacy and skill perspective. Communicate to the Board Audit Committee the impact of resource limitations as required by Standard 2020.
The Office of Inspector General shall advise the Board Audit Committee and administration of the impact of resource limitations as required by Standard 2020 and shall make appropriate requests to the Board Audit Committee for additional resources to allow the Office of the Inspector General to fulfill the approved plan.
24
www.theiia.org
2.
25
www.theiia.org
The Office of Inspector General shall conduct training on established policies and procedures for all Internal Audit management and staff to ensure a common understanding of the documented Internal Audit methodology.
26
www.theiia.org
1.
2. 3.
Solicit input from other internal and external providers of assurance and consulting services during the annual risk assessment and audit planning process to ensure their views on risk are incorporated into the Annual Audit Plan.
Provide a copy of the Annual Audit Plan to internal and external providers of assurance and consulting services, including the external auditors, and solicit input from HISDs Ethics and Compliance Officer to ensure his/her view on risk are incorporated into the Annual Audit Plan. Meet periodically with internal and external providers of assurance and consulting services to ensure communication takes place related to status of projects on the Annual Audit Plan impacting the other assurance providers and to solicit input related to changing risk profiles that they may be aware.
27
www.theiia.org
2.
3.
Periodically report on the purpose, authority, and responsibility of Internal Audit to both the Board Audit Committee and to senior management. This will be accomplished by review and approval of the Internal Audit charter on an annual basis.
28
www.theiia.org
29
www.theiia.org
3.
4.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the organizations ethics-related objectives, programs, and activities. This shall be included as a component of the audit universe discussed in the recommendation for Standard 2010.
Evaluate whether IT governance for the organization supports the organizations strategies and objectives. This shall be included as a component of the audit universe discussed in the recommendation for Standard 2010.
30
www.theiia.org
2. 3. 4.
31
www.theiia.org
2.
3. 4.
32
www.theiia.org
33
www.theiia.org
34
www.theiia.org
35
www.theiia.org
36
www.theiia.org
2.
2.
37
www.theiia.org
38
www.theiia.org
39
www.theiia.org
2.
2.
40
www.theiia.org
1.
2. 3.
Include the auditors opinion and/or conclusions in all audit reports. Criteria supporting the overall conclusion must take into account the expectations of senior management, the Board Audit Committee, and other stakeholders and must be supported by sufficient, reliable, relevant, and useful information.
Include recommended corrective action on a consistent basis for all observations raised and reported. Define criteria for rating individual observations to provide perspective to senior management, the Board Audit Committee, and other stakeholders in terms of potential impact. Defining criteria should be done in consultation with senior management and the Board Audit Committee to ensure the criteria and significance levels are clearly aligned with expectations. Categorizing exceptions using pre-defined criteria can provide a consistent view of significance across the organization and can provide insight into prioritization for management response and action.
41
www.theiia.org
42
www.theiia.org
2.
3.
Monitor action taken to address nonconformance and report status to senior management and the Board on a periodic basis.
Conduct an external quality assessment when actions taken to address nonconformance are completed to assess level of conformance with the Standards.
2.
Monitor action taken to address nonconformance and report status to senior management and the Board on a monthly basis.
The Office of Inspector General shall follow all applicable laws, rules, and regulations of the State of Texas. It shall also utilize and reference the guidelines and standards of the AICPA, TEA and GAGAS, as appropriate. The Audit Committee shall also retain an independent and qualified assessor or assessment team to conduct an external quality assessment when actions taken to address nonconformance are completed to assess the level of conformance with the Standards.
43
www.theiia.org
The Inspector General must establish and maintain a system to monitor the disposition of results communicated to the Board Audit Committee, Board, and administration (senior management). Therefore, the Office of Inspector General shall:
1. 2. 3. 4. Develop, document, and maintain a follow-up process to monitor disposition of results communicated to management and the Board Audit Committee. Include documentation of this process in the Internal Audit Policy and Procedure Manual as discussed in the recommendation for Standard 2040. Establish a tracking mechanism to manage observations reported to management and the Board Audit Committee that includes a description of the observation reported, management response and commitment for action, timeframe for resolution, and responsible party. Request reports from management on a periodic basis on the status of audit recommendations. Analyze reports received for possible further monitoring actions by Internal Audit including follow-up audits as appropriate. Escalate unsatisfactory responses to an appropriate level of management or the Board for appropriate action. Report status of open observations on a periodic basis to senior management and the Board Audit Committee. Include at a minimum the status of significant observations and recommendations as well as those instances where management action is overdue.
44
www.theiia.org
Attachment A
Conformance Rating Criteria
GC Generally Conforms means the assessor has concluded that the relevant structures, policies, and procedures of the activity, as well as the processes by which they are applied, comply with the requirements of the individual Standard or element of the Code of Ethics in all material respects. For the sections and major categories, this means that there is general conformity to a majority of the individual Standards or elements of the Code of Ethics, and at least partial conformity to the others, within the section/category. There may be significant opportunities for improvement, but these should not represent situations where the activity has not implemented the Standards or the Code of Ethics, has not applied them effectively, or has not achieved their stated objectives. As indicated above, general conformance does not require complete/perfect conformance, the ideal situation, successful practice, etc. PC Partially Conforms means the assessor has concluded that the activity is making good-faith efforts to comply with the requirements of the individual Standard or element of the Code of Ethics, section, or major category, but falls short of achieving some major objectives. These will usually represent significant opportunities for improvement in effectively applying the Standards or Code of Ethics and/or achieving their objectives. Some deficiencies may be beyond the control of the activity and may result in recommendations to senior management or the board of the organization. DNC Does Not Conform means the assessor has concluded that the activity is not aware of, is not making good-faith efforts to comply with, or is failing to achieve many/all of the objectives of the individual Standard or element of the Code of Ethics, section, or major category. These deficiencies will usually have a significant negative impact on the activitys effectiveness and its potential to add value to the organization. These may als o represent significant opportunities for improvement, including actions by senior management or the board.
45
www.theiia.org
Attachment B
Acronyms Used in Report
ACL AICPA ERM FASRG Audit Command Language (Software) American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
FCC
GAAS
Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (Promulgated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants)
Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (Issued by the U.S. Government Accountability Office) Generally Complies (Institute of Internal Auditors Rating Terminology) Institute of Internal Auditors
GAGAS
GC IIA
IPPF
46
www.theiia.org