Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Prologue
Oswald A. J. Mascarenhas S.J., Ph.D.
We are currently witnessing high turbulence in large and small corporations, and in large and small market economies. Bigger companies, in particular, are failing more frequently and with gigantic losses. Of the 20 largest U. S. bankruptcies in the two decades, 1985-2005, ten occurred in 2001-2002. Corporate earnings are more erratic. Even perennially successful companies are finding it more difficult to deliver consistently superior returns. Companies like Disney, Ford, General Motors, Daimler-Chrysler, Hewlett-Packard, Motorola, Nordstrom, and Sony one time built to last companies (Collins and Porras 1997; Collins 2001) are performing just around the Dow Jones Industrial Average (Hamel and Vlikangas 2003). High CEO turnover in large corporations is becoming commonplace (e.g., Delphi, Ford, GM, Hewlett-Packard, Gateway, and K-Mart). With imminent threats of junk bond ratings, leveraged buyouts (LBO) or hostile takeovers, the Wall Street financial analysts and investor sharks are exerting all-time high pressure on corporate executives to perform. Corporate boards and shareholders are increasingly demanding higher financial returns on investment (ROI), equity (ROE), assets (ROA), net worth (NW) and higher earnings per share (EPS) and price-earnings (P/E) ratios. Possibly yielding to such pressures, corporations have been recently indulging in unusual business practices such as creative or aggressive accounting, creative cash flow reporting, earnings management or income smoothing via overstating earnings and understating debts, and, in general, fraudulent accounting and financial reporting. Under whatever name, these unusual activities are a financial numbers game (Mulford and Comiskey 2002) or financial shenanigans (Schilit 2002) with a singular ultimate objective creating an altered impression of the firms business performance. Fortune (2002) featured twenty five such large corporate accounting frauds and security scandals, a research conducted during 2001 in conjunction with the School of Business, University of Chicago. Also, early 2000 marked the beginning of some of the worst corporate security irregularities in history. Rapidly rising stock prices and the market collapse that followed led corporate executives to unusual activities and accounting manipulations that were both morally questionable and reprehensible, or were outright violations of the law. Forbes (2002) listed twenty five massive securities irregularities among top management executives, involving a haul of over $23 billion, averaging to over $923 million per company and in excess of $257 million illgotten gains per top executive. Accountants generally classify most of the corporate accounting irregularities under two heads: a) fake transactions like round-Trip sales, and b) manipulation of debts and assets to overstate the value of the company. The U. S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) defines wash trading, also known as "round trip" or "sell/buyback" trading, as the sale of a product (e.g., electricity, optical fibers) to another company with a simultaneous purchase of the
same product at the same price. Essentially, wash trading is false trading because it boosts the companies' trading volume, or even sets benchmark prices, but shows no gains or losses on the balance sheets. While this kind of trading may not be illegal as per then extant accounting procedures (e.g., Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP) of USA), it can manipulate the power market, which is illegal. An inflated balance sheet from round-trip trading misleads investors about the true nature and volume of the company's business. Large volumes of "wash" trades raise the revenues but have no effect on earnings. Several multinational and global companies were involved in accounting irregularities. Enron (October 2001) led the gang, followed by Quest Communications (February 2002), Global Crossing (March 2002), World.com (March 2002), Adelphia Communications (April 2002), CMS Energy (May 2002), Dynergy (May 2002), El Paso (May 2002), Halliburton (May 2002), Peregrine Systems (May 2002), AOL Time Warner (July 2002), Bristol-Myers Squibb (July 2002), Duke Energy (July 2002), to name a few. More recent accounting scandals were associated with onetime respectable companies such as Arthur Anderson, Ernst & Young, KPMG, JP Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Salomon Smith Barney, Marsh & McLennan, Credit Suisse First Boston, and even the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) itself. All these companies represent bad decisions and ethical failures. Most of the top executives involved in such accounting and financial irregularities were business graduates of some of the topmost business schools of the United States. It was a massive failure in managerial ethics, corporate ethics and corporate governance. Some of the largest scams recently uncovered were in the utility business. Several wholesale power traders revealed that they participated in the so called "round trip" or "wash trading." For instance, wash-trading practices among some energy companies created false congestion and generated the perception of an energy shortage in the troubled California energy market in 2001-2002. Some would even argue that this practice contributed to the bankruptcy of the two largest California electric utilities and forced subsequent government support to keep power flowing there. The price of electricity skyrocketed and, in the end, it was the consumer who had to pay the price for corporate accounting and financial irregularities or frauds. In the wake and grip of these scandals and systematic accounting and financial irregularities, a recapture of a strong sense of business and corporate ethics is urgently imperative in every business school curriculum and corporation conduct. The massive consequences of unethical executive behavior and unethical business institutions cannot be ignored. Recent consumer boycotts of hitherto industrial icons such as Levi-Strauss, Gap, Home Depot, McDonalds, Nike, Kmart, Wal-Mart, and Shell Oil are moral wake-up calls for all corporations and their executives to renew their moral commitment to society. In 2002, the U. S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to address the increasing wave of corporate accounting and financial scandals. Section 406 of this Act mandates that the corporations should have a code of ethics for senior officers that must include standards that promote: a) honest and ethical conduct, especially in handling actual or apparent conflicts of interests between personal and professional relationships; b) that all public financial statements of corporations should be full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable, and authenticated by the CEO and CFO of each firm, who will be held responsible for errors, and c) compliance with applicable government rules and regulations. Despite this Act, corporate scandals have not abated significantly in the USA or in the Western developed world.
Thus, business ethics and corporate ethics are interdisciplinary fields that entail the domain of at least two distinct disciplines, a) business exchanges and decisions and b) the science of ethics as science of values and principles. It is a dynamic interdisciplinary field, as both disciplines are refining, changing and expanding. The field of business is expanding into new areas such as revenue management, motivation management, sustainability management, social analysis, e-business, e-advertising, Internet marketing, cyber surveys and marketing research, social electronic networking, globalization, social entrepreneurship, greening and global ecology, and contracting from traditional areas such as classic micro and macro economics, international trade theory and abstract quantitative methods, statistical methodologies and high-powered management science. Ethics is currently shrinking from the classical philosophical ethics and absolute values of ancient Greek and Medieval philosophers and dogmatic theologians. While expanding into modern and postmodern ethics of consensual values and moral principles, corporate ethics should enhance critical thinking and moral reasoning, ethics of dynamic business exchanges, rights and duties, moral worth and obligation, executive spiritual development, corporate and social responsibility, distributive and corrective justice, virtue ethics, relational ethics, ethics of trust,
cyber ethics, ethics of cyber safety and privacy, ethics of terrorism and ethics of war on terrorism, ethics of global poverty, disease and inequality, and ethics of global ecology and sustainability. Moreover, the veteran concept of business management, as represented by the 110-year old MBA curriculum and structures, is radically changing from the traditional silos of accounting, finance, marketing, operations research and management, decisions sciences, human resources management, business law, and economics into modern integrated business management that views all fields of business as networked and interdependent, interacting and synergizing business solutions to simple, complex, unstructured and wicked business problems of current markets. Specifically, with a significant majority of domestic, international and global businesses, industries, markets and trade regions floundering or disappearing, there has emerged a new discipline business turnaround and transformation management (BTTM) that researches and applies new integrated business management solutions to problems of underperformance, business downturns and recessions, corporate cash flow crisis, financial distress, financial turbulence, worker apathy, insolvency and imminent bankruptcy. Every part of business (e.g., accounting, finance, marketing, HR, production, and business law) implies ethics. Every stakeholder of business (e.g., customers, producers, employees and employers, suppliers and creditors, distributors and promoters, domestic and international governments, local and global communities) involves moral rights and duties, moral and ethical responsibilities and obligations that, in turn, invoke ethical values and moral principles. A comprehensive and integrated course in corporate or business ethics should include every part of business, as also every stakeholder of business. This book relates to corporate ethics that deals with major moral corporate executive leaders, their specific skills, personality, and critical thinking inputs, their moral reasoning processes, their decisions and choices, their mental models and business models, their strategies and actions, and above all, executive moral obligations regarding their consequences.
Under Part I, we analyze the ethics of the corporate moral agent under five heads: ethics of corporate moral human personhood (Chapter 02), ethics of corporate governance (Chapter 03), ethics of corporate critical thinking (Chapter 04), ethics of corporate virtue (Chapter 05), and ethics of corporate trust (Chapter 06). Next, under Part II, we explore the ethics of corporate moral acts and actions under three heads: ethics of corporate moral reasoning (Chapter 07),
ethics of stakeholder rights and duties (Chapter 08), and ethics of corporate moral leadership (Chapter 09). Thirdly, under Part III, we examine the ethics of corporate outputs or consequences under three themes: ethics of consequences represented by the major ethical theories of teleology, deontology, distributive and corrective justice (Chapter 10), ethics of moral responsibility (Chapter 11), and ethics of moral corporate social responsibility (Chapter 12).1 Table A captures the structure of the book succinctly.
There are other approaches to ethical and moral analysis that are quite laudable. From the viewpoint of ethical and moral leadership, we could divide the content of ethical analysis into 1) The Ethics of the Means what do leaders use to motivate followers to obtain their goals; 2) The Ethics of Person: What are the virtues and personal ethics of the leaders? Are they motivated by self-interest or altruism? 3) The Ethics of the Ends: What is the ethical value of the leaders accomplishments? Did they serve the greater good of the greatest number? [See Ciulla (2004: xvi)]. In this book we follow the suggested framework of Table A, as it better fits the moral analysis of the current business paradigm.
governance and is primarily meant for all corporate executives, boards of directors, and institutional leaders that are engaged in transforming their organizations from being not-so-good to good to great, from questionable to impeccable, ethical, moral and spiritual organizations.
The content of each chapter is best learnt and internalized against real-time live cases of current market problems, episodes, disruptive changes (Christensen et al. 2000; 2002; Collins 1999) and market busting strategies (Gunther and MacMillan 2005) as they unfold during the academic semester of learning. This is best done by challenging students with take-home, structured and unstructured, linear and circular, problem-centered exams that invite team learning of three to four weeks in ethical or moral problem identification, formulation, specification, alternatives exploration and the final choice assessment in the actual real-time field of contemporary business and market reactions. There is no closure to this book. The content of each chapter is continuously evolving and emerging. Hence, a book that captures the real-time ethical and moral process of forming strategic leaders of corporate transformation experience and accomplishment must be a work in progress that needs constant updates, upgrades, revisions and restatements. In other words, this book is not about immutable and frozen conceptualizations and theories, paradigms, models and strategies. It feeds and expands on the real, day-to-day corporate world of ethical and moral business management. The real world of corporate strategy problems is rarely simple, structured
and linear in their content and solutions. They are complex, unstructured, non-linear (i.e., often circular and spiral) and wicked (Rittel and Webber 1973) problems that need creative, imaginative, innovative, resilient (Hamel and Vlikangas 2003), analogical (Garvin and Rivkin 2005), experimental and entrepreneurial resolutions. We hope this book will challenge students and readers, teachers and executives to this great world of strategic ethical and moral leadership and organization learning (Senge 1990; 2006) of business transformation management (Hammer 2004).
References
Bollier, David (1997), Aiming Higher, New York: The American Management Association. Christensen, Clayton M. (1997), The Innovators Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston: Harvard Business School. Christensen, Clayton M. and Michael E. Raynor (2003), The Innovators Solution: Using Good Theory to Solve the Dilemmas of Growth, Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Christensen, Clayton M., Scott D. Anthony and Erik A. Roth (2004), Seeing Whats Next: Using the Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Ciulla, Joanne B. (2004), Ethics, the Heart of Leadership, 2nd edition, Westport, CT: Praeger. Collins, Jim (1999), Turning Goals into Results: The Power of Catalytic Mechanisms, Harvard Business Review, 77:4 (July-August), 71-80. Collins, Jim and Jerry I. Porras (1998/2002), Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. Harper Business. Collins, Jim (2001), Good to Great. Harper Business. Collins, Jim and Morten T. Hansen (2011), Great by Choice, Harper-Collins Publishers. Covey, Stephen R. (1989), The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. New York: Free Press. Covey, Stephen R., Roger A. Merrill, and Rebecca R. Merrill (1994/2003), First Things First: To Live, to Love, to Learn, to Leave a Legacy, New York: NY, Free Press. Covey, Stephen R. (2004), The 8th Habit: From Effectiveness to Greatness. New York: Free Press. Forbes Magazine. 2002. Recent Accounting Frauds, www.Forbes.com.accountingtracker.html) July 25. Fortune Magazine. 2002. Recent Corporate Scams, September 2, 64-74. Gavetti, Giovanni and Jan W. Rivkin (2005), How Strategists really Think: Tapping the Power of Analogy, Harvard Business Review, (April), 54-65. Gunther, Rita McGrath and Ian MacMillan (2005), Market Busting: Strategies for Exceptional Business Growth, Harvard Business Review, (March), 80-91. Hamel, Gary and Liisa Vlikangas (2003), The Quest for Resilience, Harvard Business Review, (September), 52-65. Hammer, Michael (2004), Deep Change: How Operational Innovation can Transform your Company, Harvard Business Review, (April), 84-95. Lencioni, Patrick (1998), The FIVE Temptations of a CEO: A Leadership Fable , San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Mascarenhas, Oswald A. J. (2008), Responsible Marketing: Concepts, Theories, Models, Strategies and Cases, North Richland Hills, TX: Roval Publishing Co
Mascarenhas, Oswald A. J. (2011), Business Transformation Strategies: The Role of the CEO as a Strategic Leader of Innovative Transformation, New Delhi, India: Sage Books. Mulford, Charles W. and Eugene E. Comiskey (2005), Creative Cash Flow Reporting: Uncovering Sustainable Financial Performance, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Peters, Thomas J. and Robert H. Waterman, Jr. (1982), In Search of Excellence, New York, NY: Harper and Row. ____ and Nancy Austin (1985), A Passion for Excellence, New York, NY: Random House. Rittel, H. and M. Webber (1973), Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sciences 4 (1973), 155169. Schilit, Howard M. (2002), Financial Shenanigans: How to Detect Accounting Gimmicks and Fraud in Financial Reports, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill ($22.36) (ISBN: 0071386262). Senge, Peter (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Learning Organizations , Doubleday: New York. Senge, Peter M. (2006), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Revised edition, New York, Currency: Doubleday. .
Chapter Title
In General 1 PART ONE: Ethics of Corporate Business Inputs 2 The Corporate Moral Agent 3 4 5 6 PART TWO: Ethics of Corporate Business Process PART THREE: Ethics of Corporate Business Outputs Corporate Decisions Dilemmas, Acts and Actions Executive DecisionOutcomes & Social Externalities 7 8 9 10 11 12
Preface: Ethical Imperatives for Business Executives Executive Ethics for Business Management Decisions: Conceptual Foundations The Foundation of Corporate Ethics: The Human Person The Context of Corporate Ethics: Concepts, Theories and Models of Corporate Governance The Cornerstone of Corporate Ethics: Executive Critical Thinking The Bastian of Corporate Ethics: Executive Virtue Ethics The Moral Fiber of Corporate Ethics: Executive Ethics of Trust Ethical Theories of Moral Reasoning, Moral Judgment, Moral Worth, and Moral Obligation Ethical Theories of Moral Rights and Duties of all Stakeholders Ethical and Moral Leadership for Corporate Strategies Ethical Theories of Deontology, Teleology, Distributive Justice, Corrective Justice and their Sub-Theories Ethical Theories of Moral Executive Responsibility and Moral Executive Obligation Ethics of Corporate Moral Social Responsibility for Executive Decisions and Outcomes
10