Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
We would like to remind you that this material is the property of the author. It is provided to you by the ERS for your personal use only, as submitted by the author. 2012 by the author
ERS Annual Congress Vienna
15 September 2012
29
Lastly, when deciding on which instructional method to use in any educational process, it is helpful to define what the specific learning outcomes of the curriculum would be. These specific learning outcomes otherwise called intended learning outcomes form the building blocks of any curriculum and the choice of the method to be used depends on what we want to teach the learner (content), whom we are teaching (learner), the level of competence prior to the educational encounter (prior or antecedent knowledge) and the level of competence expected to be achieved after the educational encounter (intended learning outcome).
30
Attributes DESIRED PROFESSIONAL ROLES OF Knowledge (i.e. Cognitions) (Areas of competence) Clinical Skills (i.e. Cognitive, Technical, Psychomotor perceptual skills) Attitudes & Behaviour (i.e. Cognitions, affective skills) Principles of Teaching and learning in the clinical workplace
Competency Scholar Medical expert Scholar Medical Expert Communicator Manager Professional Health advocate Communicator Collaborator Manager
During teaching and learning in complex learning environments e.g. the clinical workplace, it is important that the trainees have access to the relevant educational materials and clinical experiences that would facilitate their individual learning. In this context, educational materials refer to the various sources of basic medical and clinical knowledge (e.g. Textbooks, (digital) scientific journals, podcasts, etc.), the necessary medical instruments, apparatus and hospital infrastructure that is required for learning to take place. The clinical experience on the other hand, is the conceptual learning that occurs from engagement in the different learning activities as well as from the various interactions with the different instructors in the clinical workplace. In order to achieve the optimal clinical experience therefore, the instructors should be equipped with certain basic competencies, that include; 1. The knowledge of how to teach (i.e. didactic knowledge), 2. The knowledge of the general principles of education and 3. Proficiency in domain-specific knowledge/competencies. A lot of research has been conducted on how expert clinician educators apply their knowledge in clinical practice and in their teaching. These findings show that they regularly make use of compiled (encapsulated) knowledge in their thought processes [4]. These compiled forms of knowledge are called Illness scripts, and have been described as clinical scenarios associated with mental problemsolving strategies. Expert physicians apply these illness scripts in solving clinical problems and in there teachings. Generated after (previous) patient encounters, illness scripts are committed to memory and are retrieved when the expert physician is faced with similar clinical problems in new patients. The moment a patients problem fails to match the stored illness scripts, however, the expert clinical teacher switches to the conventional method of analytic reasoning to solve the problem. The way trainees (i.e. medical students and junior physicians) apply their knowledge in clinical practice is different because they are mostly novices and possess a sparse store of illness scripts compared to the expert physicians. As a large number of the trainees are in the initials stages of developing and cultivating their own networks of information, the learning process occurs predominantly through analytical reasoning that is associated with solving clinical problems. The different experiences, contexts and problem-solving strategies that the learners acquire in the process of developing these knowledge networks is what they subsequently store as their own easily retrievable illness scripts, similar to what the expert physicians utilize in clinical practice and teaching.
PHYSICIANS
31
32
Learning Environment Inpatient/Hospital Outpatient/Ambulatory clinic Setting Wards Operating theater Grand rounds Morning rounds Patient handover rounds Bedside teachings Outpatient clinics
Suitable instructional methods Strategy Lectures Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) Case presentations Peer-based Learning Active Learning systems e.g. simulators One minute-preceptor Direct observation of consultation skills Letters- feedback on letters/SAIL Self-Directed Learning Peer-based Learning E-Learning/ Computer assisted instruction Letters - feedback on letters/SAIL Lecture Audience response systems Team based Learning Case methods/case based discussions Clinical demonstrations Active Learning systems Size Small group teaching: Focused discussion Problem based Learning Student led seminars Role play
Remote/Distance learning
Classroom
33
Self-directed learning
Self-directed learning in the broadest sense, describes a process in which individuals take the initiative with or without the help of others, in diagnosing their learning needs, formulating learning goals, identifying resources for learning, choosing and implementing learning strategies and evaluating learning outcomes [14]. There is evidence in medical educational literature that shows that learners, who demonstrate more initiative in learning, learn more and better than their counterparts who engage in passive learning through lectures. This is because self-directed learning (SDL) is in tune with the natural processes of psychological development; an essential aspect of maturing that involves developing the ability to take increased responsibility for ones self and become increasingly selfdirected. Furthermore, the ongoing reform in (medical) education has resulted in the shift of the initiative and responsibility for learning into the hands of the learners (active learning). The ongoing challenges and reform in healthcare delivery systems also require that learners should possess lifelong learning skills i.e. the ability to analyse problems, define what needs to be learnt, know how and where to access information, evaluate information, and be aware of the one's own limitations [15].
34
The lecture
This is probably the most widely used type of formal instructional method. The lecture has been described as more or less, a continuous exposition by a speaker who wants his/her audience to learn something and its use is not restricted to formal educational settings alone, but also in arenas such as politics (speeches) and religion (sermons) [24]. Noting that lecture has its etymological roots in the Latin participle lectus (to read), it has been suggested that the academic lecture developed prior to the printing press as the only way that the knowledge stored in books could be transmitted to a large number of students. A lecture can be used to provide a broad-brush overview or introduction of a topic, particularly where the educational goal is for the learner to acquire a background familiarity with the subject, as opposed to a working knowledge. For learners who have a general knowledge of a topic, a lecture can provide an explication of the material, a cognitive framework for organizing the material, or a re-structuring of the material to make it more relevant to the situation at hand. Lectures are much less effective at changing attitudes, developing other learning skills (e.g. analysis, evaluation, teamwork, etc.) or helping learners apply knowledge to working situations.
Team-based learning
Team-Based Learning (TBL) is an educational method that bridges a large group (i.e. classroom) and small group approaches. Developed in the 1970s by Michaelson at the University of Oklahoma, it has spread into medical education since 2001 [2730]. TBL combines in-class activity with out-of-class preparation. A large class is divided into a number of student teams and preparatory homework assignments are given. The subsequent sessions, conducted with all the students in the large classroom, are highly structured and include the following components: individual and group quizzes that are immediately scored to foster accountability; discussion of quiz results; presenting a problem designed to be solved by the teams simultaneously during class; and subsequent open grading and discussion of the teams separate solutions. TBL is a method suitable for an entire course or multiple sessions within a course, and not to a single classroom experience. The educational goals can include the development of professionalism and teamwork competencies as well as problem solving and critical thinking that are much more difficult to achieve through the traditional lecture. TBL requires a skillful instructor as well as educating students about the method itself and how to perform the structured tasks.
Case method
The Case Method was developed at Harvard Business School in the 1970s by Barnes and Christensen, and it remains a widely used method today in business, law, and education [31]. However, it has not been widely adopted in medical education, as other instructional methods such as team-based and problem-based learning [32, 33]. The Case Method is predicated on the assumption that the real world is chaotic and that there are many variables that can be considered in managing real problems. The learners are given a complex task, the case, to work on outside of class. The case
35
is aligned with the learning objectives of the course and is usually designed such that there is more than one correct answer, and different reasonable approaches or solutions. Working outside of class, each person or team is expected to evaluate the case and research any necessary information. In the class session that follows, the facilitator comes prepared with questions that probe and challenge the reasoning and solutions engaging the learners to consider different conditions under which certain evaluation and management strategies might be used and when they might be inappropriate. The facilitator encourages the use of the knowledge each student has about the content to analyse, synthesize, critique, and build new conditional knowledge. At the end, the facilitator should consider some summary of what was learned from the session. The Case Method is notable for promoting critical thinking and discussion on topics about which reasonable persons can disagree. Case method teaching has been used very effectively to teach students topics in ethics and cultural competency and to discuss values and attitudes. It may be less successful at presenting information. The instructor must be a skilled discussion leader and come to the class prepared with questions that are designed to promote critical discussion of the issues raised by the case. The cases need to be sufficiently complex to allow for discussion and should address one or more learning goals. They should be as close to real situations as possible.
Demonstrations
Classroom demonstrations can be very valuable to teach and critique many skills and examine attitudes and values. Videotapes and pictures can show rashes, limps, murmurs, deformities, and intonation that cannot be described verbally. The shift in classroom dynamic draws the learners attention. The use of other senses increases what is remembered. Seeing a patient who describes and demonstrates his problem to the group enhances learning in ways that no words can ever do. Watching and critiquing a live interview can improve interviewing skills and mental flexibility.
Focused discussions
In focused discussions, a faculty member usually presents a case or a problem and then leads a discussion with the rest of the group. The cases used should be relevant to the learners antecedent knowledge, address defined learning objectives, and contain teaching points that can be applied to other situations [36]. Cases can be prepared in advance by the faculty member to capture real life
36
situations in which a professional (representing the students who are training to adopt similar professions) confronts a dilemma common to the discipline [37]. It is also possible for students to prepare their own cases following a memorable or relevant clerkship experience. The discussion is usually led by the faculty member, but can be assigned to the student. One can also consider using video clips, handouts, or study guides to stimulate discussion, reflection, and learning in the small group setting [35].
Student-led Seminars
In these seminars, the student is charged with presenting a topic to the rest of the group. The nature of the topics is usually negotiated within the small group. A topic may be chosen to complement a previous discussion or clinical experience, or a new topic may be presented. The presentation is usually followed by a focused discussion. Expectations for length of presentation use of handouts, or audio-visual material should be clearly stated in advance.
Role play
Role-play is an excellent technique for building clinical skills in the safety of the small group setting. It is particularly effective for practicing communication skills. Role-plays can be based on previously scripted written scenarios or on a real case that may have been presented to the group. Clear instructions must to be given regarding the nature of the roles, timing, and specific objectives. The role-play may be enacted in groups of two, with one student playing the physician and another playing the patient. Role- play can also take place in groups of three, with an observer added to the group. The observer should be given a checklist to facilitate observation and feedback. A debriefing and an opportunity for self-assessment and feedback should always follow the role- play.
37
Conclusion
Knowledge acquisition in postgraduate medical training is an active process and involves the processing of information through the interaction of existing knowledge with new knowledge. During this process, the learners prior knowledge is important for learning and the quality of what is learnt is dependent on the activation of prior knowledge, the degree of elaboration of the knowledge or skill being learnt and the effective transfer of the prior knowledge in the new learning context. Therefore, effective instructional methods and the knowledge of their strengths and weaknesses are crucial for effective learning in the clinical learning environment.
References
1. David, T.J. & Patel, L. Adult learning theory, problem based learning, and paediatrics. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1995; 73: 357-63 2. Bloom, B, Englehart, M, Furst, E, Hill, W, & Krathwohl, D. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green; 1956 3. Gonczi, A., Hager, P., & Athanasou, J. The development of competency-based assessment strategies strategies for the professions. National Office of Overseas Skills Recognition Research Paper no. 8. Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra 1993 4. Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HPA. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and implications. Academic Medicine, 1990; 65(10): 611-21 5. Cooper D, Beswick W, Whelan G. Intensive bedside teaching of physical examination to medical undergraduates: evaluation including the effect of group size. Med Educ. 1983;17:311-5. 6. Morgan WL. Bedside teaching. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1981; 93:164-71. 7. Reischman F, Browning FE, Hinshaw JR. Observation of undergraduate clinic teaching in action. J Med Educ. 1964; 39:147-63. 8. Functions and structure of a medical school http://www.lcme.org/standard.htm#current. Accessed 28 July 2009. Liaison Committee on Medical Education, Washington, DC. 9. Mavis BE, Cole BL, Hoppe RB. A survey of student assessment in the U. S. medical schools: the balance of breadth versus fidelity. Teach Learn Med. 2001; 13:74-9. 10. Borowitz SM, Saulsbury FT, Wilson WG. Information collected during the residency match process does not predict clinical performance. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000; 54:256-60. 11. Carline JD, Paauw DS, Thiede KW, Ramsey PG. Factors affecting the reliability of ratings of students clinical skills in a medicine clerkship. J Gen Intern Med. 1992; 7:506-10. 12. Norman G. The long case versus objective structured clinical examinations. BMJ 2002; 324:748-749. 13. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:476-481. 14. Knowles, M. S. (1975) Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
38
15. Shokar, G. S., Shokar, N.K., Romero, C.M. and Bulik ,R.J. (2003) Self-directed learning: looking at outcomes with medical students, Family Medicine, 35(6):445-6. 16. Topping KJ: The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education (Historical Archive) 1996, 32:321-345. 17. Topping KJ: The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. In Mentoring and Tutoring by Students Edited by: Goodlad S. London, Kogan Page; 1998. 18. Trevino PM, Eiland DC: Evaluation of basic science, peer tutorial programme for first- and second-year medical students. Journal of Medical Education 1980, 55:952-953. 19. Ebbert MR, Morgan PM, Harris LB: A comprehensive student peer-teaching programme. Academic Medicine 1999, 74:583-584. 20. Fantuzzo JW, Dimeff LA, Fox SL: Reciprocal peer tutoring: A multimodal assessment of effectiveness with college students. Teaching of Psychology 1989, 16:133-135. 21. Fantuzzo JW: Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement and Psychological Adjustment: A Component Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 1989, 81:173-177. 22. Lambiotte JG: Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 1987, 79:424-430. 23. Annis LF: The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications 1983, 2:39-47. 24. Bligh DA. What's the use of lectures? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000. 25. Menon AS, Moffett S, Enriquez M, Martinez MM, Dev P, Grappone T. Audience response made easy: using personal digital assistants as a classroom polling tool. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(3):217-20. 26. Uhari M, Renko M, Soini H. Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMC Med Educ. 2003;3(1):12. 27. Hunt DP, Haidet P, Coverdale JH, Richards B. The effect of using team learning in an evidence-based medicine course for medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15(2):131-9. 28. Levine RE, O'Boyle M, Haidet P, Lynn DJ, Stone MM, Wolf DV, Paniagua FA. Transforming a clinical clerkship with team learning. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(3):270- 5. 29. Michaelsen L, Richards B. Drawing conclusions from the team-learning literature in healthsciences education: a commentary. Teach Learn Med. 2005;17(1):85-8. 30. Nieder GL, Parmelee DX, Stolfi A, Hudes PD. Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat. 2005;18(1):56-63. 31. Barnes LB, Christensen CR, Hansen AJ. Teaching and the case method. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1994. 32. Beech DJ, Domer FR. Utility of the case-method approach for the integration of clinical and basic science in surgical education. J Cancer Educ. 2002;17(3):161-4. 33. Goodenough DA. Changing ground: a medical school lecturer turns to discussion teaching. In: Christensen CR, Garvin DA, Sweet A, eds. Education for judgment: the artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1991. p 83- 98. 34. Dennick RG, Exley K. Teaching and learning in groups and teams. Biochemical Education. 1998; 26(2):111-5. 35. Steinert Y. Twelve tips for effective small group teaching in the health professions. Med Teach. 1996; 203-7. 36. Herreid CF. What makes a good case? J Coll Sci Teach. 1998; 27(3):163-5. 37. Armstrong E. Overview: Advantages of the case based approach. Pedicases.org. Boston: Harvard Medical School; 2004. [updated 2005 August 15; cited 2011 Mar 24]. Available from: http://www.pedicases.org/teaching/overview/approach.html. 38. Ward JP, Gordon J, Field MJ, Lehmann HP. Communication and information technology in medical education. Lancet. 2001;357: 79296
Further reading
1. Spencer J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Learning and teaching in the clinical environment British Medical Journal 2003; 326:591-94
39
2. Cox K. Planning bedside teaching. (Parts 1 to 8.) Med J Australia 1993; 158:280-2, 355-7, 417-8, 493-5, 571-2, 607-8, 789-90, and 159:64-5. 3. Parsell G, Bligh J. Recent perspectives on clinical teaching. Med Educ 2001; 35:409-14. 4. Hargreaves DH, Southworth GW, Stanley P,Ward SJ. On-the-job learning for physicians. London: Royal Society of Medicine, 1997. 5. Ross, Michael T. and Cameron, Helen S. 'Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE Guide no. 30', Medical Teacher, 29: 6, 2007, 527-45 6. Durning, Steven J. and Cate, Olle Th. J. ten 'Peer teaching in medical education', Medical Teacher, 29: 6, 2007, 523 524
40
GOAL
WORKPLACE LEARNING
41
LEARNING STYLE
Different among individuals Habitual or behavioural On its own neither good nor bad influenced by context, subculture
concrete experience starts by experiencing: activists reflective observation Reserved, tests the water: reflector abstract conceptualising Explanation, models, concepts: theoretists active experimenting Tests theory in practice: pragmatist
Kolb
42
Not always in the same order Not in the same degree/intensity Extent of acquisition related to preferred activity Origin of the typical thinker and doer
Focus on reproducing facts (rote learning) Memorising, focused on tests, classroom learning Exam scores Focus on understanding/meaning (holistic learning) Major highlights, standpoints, conclusions, critical Personal interest Focus on application (apprenticeship) Relevance, opportunities for application, concrete information Vocation
43
The human mind is not an archive The human mind is organized as a network Memory is dynamic
Meaning
44
What did you retain from this text? Mention a few relevant aspects ..
Washing Clothes
The procedure is actually quite simple. First you arrange items into different groups. Of course, one pile may be sufficient depending on how much there is to do. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities that is the next step; otherwise, you are pretty well set. It is important not to overdo things. That is, it is better to do too few things at once than too many. In the short run this may not seem important, but complications can easily arise. A mistake can be expensive as well. At first, the whole procedure may seem complicated. Soon, however, it will become just another facet of life. After the procedure is completed, one arranges the materials into different groups again. Then they can be put into their appropriate places. Eventually they will be used once more and the whole cycle will then have to be repeated. However, that is part of life.
Encodingspecificity
The way certain things are learnt (encoded) determines whether and/or how the knowledge is retrievable for use (weekdays)
45
Teaching
46
INTEGRATING KNOWLEDGE
Novice
versus
Expert
47
COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT
Dynamic process
does
knows
Miller 1990
48
COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT
Dynamic process
does
knows knows
Miller 1990
ENDPOINTS OF COMPETENCE
Levels of competency
competence
Independent
distant supervision close supervision
49
50