Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Te Rawhiti Marae
Te Rawhiti
Bay of Islands
CONTENTS
ew Elevations
To: Murray McDonald and Tammy Wooster, Resource Consent Dept, Far North District
Council, Private Bag 752, Kaikohe
Appendix 1 The ew Over all Development Plan for Te Rawhiti Marae
A Variation to the approved Land use consent is required for the extension to the marae complex.
The primary reason for the request for variation is that the design has changed.
The main complex is still within the footprint of the approved plan which was planned on the
footprint of the existing buildings.
The wharehui will not be moved 4m to the west (that is, towards the front fence). This has
brought internal adjustments.
There is now no purpose built Caretaker’s cottage on the northern hillside. The ex-Kohanga Reo
building at the back of the Marae complex is now to be adapted the caretaker’s cottage.
There is now no purpose built Mahi Toi building on the northern hillside.
4
The existing dining hall is to be moved to the lower southern hillside to be adapted to a Mahi
Toi/Administration/Archive centre.
There is also a variation to the retaining wall along the wharehui northern wall.
There are two extra retaining wall behind the Mahi Toi / Administration building. These walls
may be a restricted discretionary activity.
There are minor setback variations summarised in the Table 1.0 below.
Variation in retaining walls: See Appendix 1.Proposed Site and Drainage plan (2).
The height of the retaining wall along the north-eastern boundary, at the rear of the complex,
infringed by .900m at 2.4m was approved.
This wall has now extended from to a length of 49.15m from the front of the Whare Hui around
its northern wall to the rear of the toilet block. The maximum height is RL 2.8m to 2.4. to 2.17m
to 1.5m.
The two retaining walls, upper and lower, around the Mahi Toi/ Administration Centre will be
36.5m long with maximum heights from 6.62m to 8.83m and the upper retaining wall to 10m.
The proposed extensions are an integrated and a staged development, involving the following
activities:
The extension, renovation and refurbishment of the Marae buildings, utilities and services
The Area The Approved The Infringement The Variation 2008 The
Consent 2007 Infringement
from RC 08
Earthworks 45m 3 NIL 410.75m2 455.75m3 -
50= 405.75
m3
Total building 954m2 NIL 1176.50m 2 = 12.5% NIL
coverage of site of area
Total site area
5
9414m2
Total 840m2 /9414m2 NIL 646.10 m2 = 6.86% NIL
impermeable area
Max main bldg 5.83m (RL NIL 5.75m (RL 11.95m) NIL
height 12.03m) Decrease of .08m
New Ablutions 82.4m2 NIL 91.76m2 =increase of NIL
9.3 m2
Kitchen 41.7m2 to 119m2 NIL 69.2m2 = decrease of NIL
49.8m2
Wharehui 63m2 to 84m2 NIL 142.5 m2 =increase NIL
of
58.5 m2
Dining Hall 105.6 m2 to NIL 250 m2 = increase of NIL
172.6 m2 77.4 m2
Storage rooms 6 m2 to 50 m2 NIL 54.2 m2 = increase NIL
of
4.2 m2
New Dangerous 6.5 m2 NIL 6.8 m2 NIL
Goods Store
Archive 12.4 m2 NIL 11.5 m2 = decrease of NIL
.9 m2
Adminstration 28.8 m2 NIL
Centre
Mahi Toi Room 24 m2 NIL 65.2 m2 = increase of NIL
41.2 m2
Caretaker’s 92 m2 NIL 82 m2 = decrease of NIL
cottage 10 m2
New outside 243 m2 NIL 256 m2 = increase of NIL
decks .13 m2
Carparks 17 Approved 14 NIL
b The open drain is to be left open. The water flow in this drain is rare. The culvert under
the road is 900mm and the storm water on site will discharge to the existing culvert.
c Installing and burying an Innoflow Treatment and disposal system (1000m2 drip line
disposal field) will remain as approved
e A Roof water Runoff system with storage tank and pipes, ultraviolet water cleaning unit
and pump at rear of toilet block will be installed as approved.
f Minimal vegetation clearance to place the Mahi Toi Centre of no more than 135 m2
2.0 Any additional fees and charges relating to this application shall be invoiced to:
The Community
The community remains the same and the numbers using the marae.
The Background and History of the Marae and Utilities remain the same.
4.6 Utilities
4.6.1 Water
At present, there is parking available within the Marae grounds however increasing this capacity
is required. There will be provision for 14 new car parks available for everyday parking. This is
considered sufficient parking for the nature of this development. This is because there is off-site
parking available. Road-side parking adjacent the Marae and directly outside the Marae gates is
the current rural practice and has been since the road was put in 38 years ago.
There will not be any change to the hours of operation, the noise levels, and the servicing of the
Marae thus they will not affect the surrounding environment any more than they have in the past.
6.1 The legal description of the location of the proposed activity is as follows:
A Roof run-off system is the same as proposed and approved. The overflow from this system
including any other downpipe discharge and on paving areas will discharge to the open drain via
an outlet structure placed near the road end 0f the subject drain.
There are no natural hazards recorded for the application site in the PDP.
Earthworks will be carried out in clement weather months, from March to May. There will be no
engineering of the open drain
Sediment control measures will be maintained until works and restoration are completed
Building foundations and the retaining walls will be designed for the conditions
Care will be taken to remove only the minimum of existing manuka. All exposed surfaces will be
re vegetated with native plantings as per landscape plan.
8
Mitigation measures to prevent silt reaching the CMA will be in place before commencement of
any earthworks, particularly in relation to the open drain.
7.0 I attach in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Act an assessment of
environmental effects in detail that corresponds with the scale and significance of the effects that
the proposed activity may have on the environment.
8.0 ew Written Approval Affected Parties for variation to resource consent:
Posted to hapu:
8 COCLUSIO
The Revised Proposed Far orth District Plan considers the Proposal a Restricted
Discretionary, therefore the Consent Authority must restrict the exercise of its discretion to
those matters specified in the Plan.
This has been approved.
The buildings are setback 30m from the front boundary. At the rear (north east) of the building,
the setback allowance is infringed, though this infringement is close to the footprint of the
existing building. There is a letter of agreement to accept the infringement of setback from the
affected boundary property owners of 2G1. Further mitigation of infringement is that the
neighbouring property 2G1, in this corner, is densely covered with 4 metre high Manuka
screening the marae from any future building on the hillside above, should any occur. The letter
also details the variation in earthworks needed to accommodate the new buildings.
Te Rawhiti Marae itself is a significant cultural site. There are no archaeological sites recorded
on the property.
The area is Coastal Living surrounded by General Coastal and Outstanding Landscape which
means that the visual impact of this proposal is of primary importance.
Resource Consent Appendix 7 Photo 7 Te Rawhiti Marae from the sea, Tawa Iti Bay, Te Rawhiti,
shows the dwarfing of the imposing, tree covered hills surrounding the valley in which are sited
the Marae buildings.
The visual effects incorporate a change in style from traditional to a contemporary concept. The
design is sympathetic to the traditional wharehui and is designed to make the wharehui more
prominent. The extensive use of glass is important in that it allows us to look through the building
thus reducing the solid nature of traditional style architecture and does not impose on a tree filled
coastal bay. The high hills around the valley dominate and negate the size of the community
buildings.
The Te Rawhiti Marae is a large community building. It is a site of cultural significance and has
been for almost a century.
3.1.1 The new building has been set on the foot print of the former one therefore its placement
has not increased its effects. The new buildings are small and will be screened by
planting.
3.1.2 The site for the buildings is set at the base of a small valley. From the sea, the height of
the hills and dense vegetation dramatically reduces the visual impact and absorb the size
of the buildings
3.1.3 From the road, there is some planting, but visibility in to, and visibility out of, the Marae
is an important aspect of the Marae tradition
3.1.4 The road has created a moderate tourist attraction because of vehicle access. The Marae
preceded the road.
3.1.5 The plantings on either hillside and the dense vegetation on the eastern hill, will mitigate
visual effects by absorption.
3.1.6 Non-reflecting, recessive hues of the traditional Marae colours will assist in
reducing visual effects.
3.1.7 The Marae is the only building contained in the valley within the bay.
3.1.8 The Marae complex will not be visible from any neighbouring houses.
3.1.9 The effects of the development are considered minimal.
Public access within the CMA, including the foreshore, will be unaltered by this
proposal.
Please sign and send this letter back in the envelope provided.
The Applicant:
We have outlined the variations to the resource consented to in 2007-the design, the
earthworks and setbacks associated with the design, and visual effects.
We/I have inspected the proposal and the plans and write that:
Signed…………………………….………Date………………