47 views

Uploaded by veda20

Options

- Resume
- Real Options: Handbook
- Options Article
- Advanced_Financial_Accounting_and_Reporting.doc
- ch1
- Black Scholes Model Report.docx
- Valuation of E&P Using Real Option Model
- Real Options LBSIM
- Basics of Derivatives
- FINMAN TB Chapter13 Capital Structure and Leverage
- Barrier 2
- Leung, Y.P.B
- 3G Expansion
- Real Options
- 04 Real Option Analysis
- UpdateJune08
- Eric Sorensen - The Salomon Smith Ba
- Risk Management & Derivatives Unit 1
- 023-2
- Assignment 03

You are on page 1of 33

Agenda

Discounted Cash Flow Decision Tree

Application to case

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 2

financial modeling step objectives

Identify value drivers and relative contributions to total uncertainty in the financial model; set goals for reducing uncertainty in the Development stage; in this stage, risks will also be categorized as market risk or project specific risk

Create probability distributions for model assumptions: Model the risk profile for the opportunity

Determine quantifiable options embedded in the opportunity, including options for deferral, abandonment, growth, flexibility, and timing; Create a decision tree

Develop estimates for the economic value determined by discounted cash flow and strategic value determined by real options; create budget for the Development stage

Reduced risk in valuation estimate; identification of market, (non-diversifiable) risk and project-specific (diversifiable) risk

Assess product development process efficiency; demonstrate value created by the NPD team during the subject phase, Determine optimal portfolio investments

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 3

Implicitly assumes only one investment decision Not applicable for comparing competing projects with different risks or scale Value of learning or managerial flexibility is not quantified Discount rate incorrectly includes market risk and unique risk

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 4

Risks

Unique to the opportunity in question Usually decline over the course of a well-managed project Can be diversified High values reduce DCF Value

Risks affect all competitors in the market Can increase or decrease during the project Cannot be diversified High market risk increases the value of real options

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 5

Idea Generation

Feasibility Assessment

Development

Piloting

Launch

Project-Specific Risk

100%

80%

50%

30%

High

High

Low

Negative

Negative

Positive

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 6

100 85%

Cumulative Percent of Cost

95%

80 60 40 20

70%

Life-Cycle Cost Determination Up to 85% of Product Costs are Committed During Design and Development

35% 22%

Cost-Reduction Opportunities

Source: DARPA Rapid Design Exploration and Optimization (RaDEO) Project

Idea

Validation

Design

Development

Mfg.

Support

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 7

Case Study

A food company has completed a business plan for a delicious, non-fat yogurt smoothie, aimed at busy professionals who often dont have time to eat, but are still health-conscious and desire tasty, healthy alternatives to vending-machine food. Market research indicates strong evidence of customer demand and willingness to pay for the product, and the next major investment needed before entering a regional market is $1 Million, to be used for the creation of a production process to manufacture the product in high volumes. The development of the production process is expected to take one year, and a regional rollout can be completed in two years, at a cost of $5 Million, if the process design and implementation is successful. If the regional rollout succeeds, a national market launch can be completed during the fourth year. The full market launch is expected to cost $66 Million over the next four years. The company would like to determine if the current $1 Million investment is prudent, given the size of the opportunity, the proposed staging of investments, and the project and market risks. The company would also like to quantify the value of managerial flexibility embedded in the opportunity.

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 8

Ideation

Analysis 2

Experiment 3

Business Plan 4

Should we invest $1,000,000 in the next stage of product development, resulting in the creation of a production process for a new beverage?

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 9

Market size: First year sales: Sales grow th rate, years 2-5: Sales grow th rate, years 6-10: Terminal Value grow th rate: Cost of goods sold grow th rate: Operating expenses/sales ratio: Capital investment: Unrecoverable launch costs: Discount rate: Tax rate: Year Sales Cost of goods sold Net Sales Total operating expenses EBITDA Taxes Capital + Launch Cost Operating cash flow NPV, Years 1-10: NPV, including terminal value: IRR: Value of underlying security ($60.0) ($60.0) $0.64 $53.92 22.92% $113.92 $4.0 $5.6 $7.7 $10.6 $14.3 $15.8 $17.5 $19.4 $21.4 $23.7 $197.52 $53.28 $150.0 $12.0 30.0% 10.0% 2.0% 5.0% 20.0% $40.0 $20.0 14% 40% Terminal 1 $12.0 $3.0 $9.0 $2.4 $6.6 $2.6 2 $15.6 $3.2 $12.5 $3.1 $9.3 $3.7 3 $20.3 $3.3 $17.0 $4.1 $12.9 $5.2 4 $26.4 $3.5 $22.9 $5.3 $17.6 $7.0 5 $34.3 $3.6 $30.6 $6.9 $23.8 $9.5 6 $37.7 $3.8 $33.9 $7.5 $26.3 $10.5 7 $41.5 $4.0 $37.5 $8.3 $29.2 $11.7 8 $45.6 $4.2 $41.4 $9.1 $32.3 $12.9 9 $50.2 $4.4 $45.7 $10.0 $35.7 $14.3 10 $55.2 $4.7 $50.5 $11.0 $39.5 $15.8 Value all dollar amounts are in millions

Market Share

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

8.0%

10.4%

13.5%

17.6%

22.8%

25.1%

27.6%

30.4%

33.5%

36.8%

Page 10

Market size: Year 5 sales: Sales grow th, years 6-9: Sales grow th, years 10-14: Terminal Value grow th: COGS grow th rate: Op Ex/Sales ratio: Production process costs: Regional phase costs: U.S. market launch costs: Discount rate: Risk-free rate: Tax rate: Year Sales Cost of goods sold Net Sales Total operating expenses EBITDA Taxes Product Development Costs Operating cash flow PV (cash flow s, 14%) PV (investment, 5%) NPV Underlying security $8.94 $63.57 ($0.95) $0.00 ($4.32) ($49.36) ($1.0) ($1.0) ($5.0) ($5.0) $150.0 $12.0 30.0% 10.0% 2.0% 5.0% 20.0% $1.0 $5.0 $60.0 14% 5% 40% 0 1 2 3 4 $6.0 $4.0 $2.0 $2.0 $0.0 $0.0 ($60.0) ($60.0) $4.0 $2.06 $5.6 $2.55 $7.7 $3.10 $10.6 $3.71 $14.3 $4.39 $15.8 $4.26 $17.5 $4.14 $19.4 $4.02 $21.4 $3.90 $23.7 $197.52 $3.79 $27.67 5 $12.0 $3.0 $9.0 $2.4 $6.6 $2.6 6 $15.6 $3.2 $12.5 $3.1 $9.3 $3.7 7 $20.3 $3.3 $17.0 $4.1 $12.9 $5.2 8 $26.4 $3.5 $22.9 $5.3 $17.6 $7.0 9 $34.3 $3.6 $30.6 $6.9 $23.8 $9.5 10 $37.7 $3.8 $33.9 $7.5 $26.3 $10.5 11 $41.5 $4.0 $37.5 $8.3 $29.2 $11.7 12 $45.6 $4.2 $41.4 $9.1 $32.3 $12.9 13 $50.2 $4.4 $45.7 $10.0 $35.7 $14.3 14 $55.2 $4.7 $50.5 $11.0 $39.5 $15.8 Terminal Value 15 all dollar amounts are in millions

Market Share

8.0%

10.4%

13.5%

17.6%

22.8%

25.1%

27.6%

30.4%

33.5%

36.8%

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 11

4

go

5

50%, go

6

60%, go

Launch in the U.S. market Cost: ($60.00 M) PV Cost: (49.36 M) PV Cash Fl: $63.57 M NPV: $14.21 M

$2.68 M

50%, abandon

1 year

2 years

40%, abandon

abandon

1 year

20% X (($0.95 M)+($4.32 M)) = 20% X ($5.27 M) =

($1.05 M)

50% X ($0.95 M) =

($0.48 M)

The decision to invest would be easier if we knew the value of each stage The value of managerial flexibility is not yet quantified Success probabilities apply to unique risks only The case is marginally attractive

$1.15 M

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 12

A contract conveying the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell designated securities or commodities at a specified price during a stipulated period.

Call option a contract to buy Put option a contract to sell A European option gives the owner of the option contract the right to buy the designated securities only on the expiration date for the option. An American option gives the owner of the option contract the right to buy the designated securities at any time before the expiration date.

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 13

There are several methods for estimating the value of a financial option (such as a stock option), but the most commonly used is the Black-Scholes1 equation, which expresses the value as a function of six variables:

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

The stock price The exercise price (or, strike price) The risk-free rate of return The volatility of the underlying security The time to expiration The dividend yield

Fischer Black and Myron Scholes of the MIT Sloan School of Management developed the original option valuation model using five variables. The dividend yield variable was added by Robert Merton in 1975. Fischer Black and Robert Merton won the Nobel Prize in Economics for their work on the option valuation model in 1997. Fischer Black, who died in 1995, was mentioned in the award citation.

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 14

Real Options

Stewart Myers of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology observed that the Black-Scholes model could be used to value investment opportunities in real markets-the markets for products and services. Today, this technique is commonly used in industries such as:

Oil and Gas Exploration Pharmaceuticals Chemicals Semiconductors

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 15

Inputs Stock Price ($): Uncertainty (%): Exercise Price ($): Time To Expiry (years): Div idends ($): Risk-free Interest Rate (%): $28.00 Stock Price 27.82% Volatility from Chicago Board of Options Exchange $27.50 The present v alue of the cost of dev eloping the new product 0.2685 The option is v alid for 98 days between 24 March 2003 and 30 June 2003 $0.76 Annual div idends 3.98% 10 year treasury yield

Outputs d 1: N(d 1): d 2: N(d 2): Value of the option: All data as of 24 March, 2003 0.220646468 0.587316105 0.076491614 0.530486076 $1.89

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 16

$7.00

$6.00

$5.00

$4.00

$20.00 $25.00

$3.00

$27.50 $30.00

$2.00

$1.00

$0.00 Nov-00

Jan-01

Feb-01

Apr-01

Jun-01

Jul-01

Sep-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 17

Present Value of the cash flows from the project Required new investment, unrecoverable NPD cost Length of time until decision must be made Time value of money Risk of the expected returns Annual cost of preserving the option S X t rf

Stock price Exercise price Time to expiration Risk-free rate of return Variance of returns on stock Dividend Yield

2

D

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 18

Value of the Option to Delay Launch, Generic New Product Development Example

payoff and call option v alue

$300,000 uncertainty = 100% uncertainty = 50% uncertainty = 30%

$100,000

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 19

lower values lower values

1.0

higher values

Cumulative Volatility (

higher values

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 20

Model the Regional Launch Phase as a 2-year call option to invest $60 Million in the

National Launch Phase

Model the Production Process Development Phase as a 1-year call option to invest $5

Million in the Regional Launch Phase

PV, Costs: ($1.0 M) PV, Benefits:: $ 2.98 M

Strike Price: $5.0 M Stock Price: $ 10.95 M Volatility: 40% Time to expiry: 1 year Risk-free rate: 5% Gross Option value:$5.95 M Success probability: 50% Net Option value: $2.98 M

Strike Price: $60 M Stock Price: $ 63.57 M Volatility: 40% Time to expiry: 2 years Risk-free rate: 5% Gross Option value:$18.26 M Success probability: 60% Net Option value: $10.95 M

NPV: $1.98 M

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 21

Volatility

Develop a Production Process Launch in a Regional Market

Strike Price: $5.0 M Stock Price: $ 9.12 M Volatility: 30% Time to expiry: 1 year Risk-free rate: 5% Gross Option value:$4.37 M Success probability: 50% Net Option value: $2.19 M

Strike Price: $60 M Stock Price: $ 63.57 M Volatility: 30% Time to expiry: 2 years Risk-free rate: 5% Gross Option value:$15.21 M Success probability: 60% Net Option value: $9.12 M

30%

PV, Costs: ($1.0 M) PV, Benefits:: $ 2.19 M

NPV: $1.19 M

Develop a Production Process

Strike Price: $5.0 M Stock Price: $ 10.95 M Volatility: 40% Time to expiry: 1 year Risk-free rate: 5% Gross Option value:$5.95 M Success probability: 50% Net Option value: $2.98 M

Strike Price: $60 M Stock Price: $ 63.57 M Volatility: 40% Time to expiry: 2 years Risk-free rate: 5% Gross Option value:$18.26 M Success probability: 60% Net Option value: $10.95 M

40%

PV, Costs: ($1.0 M) PV, Benefits:: $ 2.98 M

NPV: $1.98 M

Develop a Production Process

Strike Price: $5.0 M Stock Price: $ 12.79 M Volatility: 50% Time to expiry: 1 year Risk-free rate: 5% Gross Option value:$8.07 M Success probability: 50% Net Option value: $4.03 M

Strike Price: $60 M Stock Price: $ 63.57 M Volatility: 50% Time to expiry: 2 years Risk-free rate: 5% Gross Option value:$21.31 M Success probability: 60% Net Option value: $12.79 M

50%

PV, Costs: ($1.0 M) PV, Benefits:: $ 4.03 M

NPV: $3.03 M

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 22

Inputs Stock Price ($, millions): Volatility (%): Exercise Price ($, millions): Time To Expiry (years): Div idends ($): Risk-free Interest Rate (%): $63.57 The present v alue of the cash flows, or, the v alue of the underlying security 30% The standard dev iation in the present v alue of the project cash flows $60.00 The unrecov erable costs of launching the product in a national market 2.0 The period for which this inv estment opportunity is v alid; proposed delay period for decision $0 The estimated annual cost of preserv ing the option (technical expertise, product dev elopers) 5.00% Two year treasury security yield

Outputs d 1: N(d 1): d 2: N(d 2): Gross Value of the Option: Probability of success: Net Value of the Option: 0.584063363 0.720411205 0.159799294 0.563480421 $15.21 60% $9.12

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 23

Stock Price:

31.20%

Uncertainty

5.98%

Time To Expiry

4.87%

Exercise Price

21.76%

1.97%

% change in option value for a 10% change in value driver

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 24

0 0

t

Cumulative Volatility (

Probably never

NP V=

Probably soon

Maybe later

Source: Timothy Leuhrman, Strategy as a Portfolio of Real Options, Harvard Business Review, Sept.-Oct 1998

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 25

0 0

t

Production process

2.0 1

Cumulative Volatility (

Regional launch

National launch

Probably soon

NP V=

Maybe later

Source: Timothy Leuhrman, Strategy as a Portfolio of Real Options, Harvard Business Review, Sept.-Oct 1998

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 26

Xcel Energy uses Real Options to estimate the strategic value of initiatives in our new product portfolio, and to plan investments in product development resources, market research, pilots and market trials. By using real options with a structured new product development process, this technique is invaluable for estimating the appropriate investments in successive development phases, and to ensure that we risk only the amount of money justified by the sum of the economic value derived from discounted cash flow analysis and the strategic value derived from real options analysis.

Doug Jaeger Vice President of Sales and Marketing Xcel Energy Corporation

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 27

Low Market size: First year sales: Sales grow th rate, years 2-5: Sales grow th rate, years 6-10: Terminal Value grow th rate: Cost of goods sold grow th rate: Operating expenses/sales ratio: Capital investment: Unrecoverable launch costs: Discount rate: Tax rate: Year Sales Cost of goods sold Net Sales Total operating expenses EBITDA Taxes Capital + Launch Cost Operating cash flow NPV, Years 1-10: NPV, including terminal value: IRR: Value of underlying security ($60.0) ($60.0) $0.64 $53.92 22.92% $113.92 $4.0 $5.6 $7.7 $10.6 $14.3 $15.8 $17.5 $19.4 $21.4 $23.7 $197.52 $53.28 $150.0 $12.0 30.0% 10.0% 2.0% 5.0% 20.0% $40.0 $20.0 14% 40% Terminal 1 $12.0 $3.0 $9.0 $2.4 $6.6 $2.6 2 $15.6 $3.2 $12.5 $3.1 $9.3 $3.7 3 $20.3 $3.3 $17.0 $4.1 $12.9 $5.2 4 $26.4 $3.5 $22.9 $5.3 $17.6 $7.0 5 $34.3 $3.6 $30.6 $6.9 $23.8 $9.5 6 $37.7 $3.8 $33.9 $7.5 $26.3 $10.5 7 $41.5 $4.0 $37.5 $8.3 $29.2 $11.7 8 $45.6 $4.2 $41.4 $9.1 $32.3 $12.9 9 $50.2 $4.4 $45.7 $10.0 $35.7 $14.3 10 $55.2 $4.7 $50.5 $11.0 $39.5 $15.8 Value $10.0 10% 0% 1.5% 3% 18% $38.0 $18.0 $14.0 triangular 50% triangular 20% triangular 2.5% lognormal 7% triangular 22% normal $42.0 uniform $22.0 triangular High Distribution all dollar amounts are in millions

Market Share

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

8.0%

10.4%

13.5%

17.6%

22.8%

25.1%

27.6%

30.4%

33.5%

36.8%

Page 28

Simulation Results

Market Share Frequency Distribution

140 120 100

Frequency

80 60 40 20 0 13%

18%

24%

29%

35%

40%

45%

51%

56%

62%

67%

72%

Market Share

140 120

Frequency

Median: 23.35% Standard Deviation: 4.88% Uncertainty, for Black-Scholes Equation: 4.88%/23.35% =

100 80 60 40 20 0 11% 14% 17% 20% 23% 26% 29% 32% 35%

21%

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 29

60 February 6, 2002 General Mills revises 3Q01 earnings estimate from $0.40-$0.44/sh. to $0.27-$0.29/sh. due to Pillsbury/General Mills sales transition Stock price drops 10% S&P credit outlook revised from stable to negative

50

40

30

20

10

Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Jan-02

Feb-02

Mar-02

Apr-02

May-02

Jun-02

Jul-02

Aug-02

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 30

Benefits for using Real Options and Monte Carlo Simulation for NPD Valuation

Valuable tool for estimating the value of each stage Portfolio optimization Separation of unique risk and market risk Tool for prioritizing activities in each stage Quantify R&D and Market Research expenditures Justify numerous small experiments to produce valuable information Maximize value by building flexibility into plans Resource allocation tool-quickly estimate the value of deferring or accelerating projects Become proficient at recognizing opportunities with high market risk and controllable unique risk

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 31

Reading List

Books Martha Amram and Nalin Kulatika, Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World (Boston Mass.: Harvard Business School Publishing, 1998) Avinash K. Dixit and Robert S. Pinkyck, Investment Under Uncertainty (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994) Lenos Trigeorigis, Real Options, Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996) F. Peter Boer, The Real Options Solution: Finding Total Value in a High-Risk World (New York, N.Y. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002) Paul Wilmott, Paul Willmot on Quantitative Finance (West Sussex, England, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000) Richard A. Brealey and Stewart Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance fifth edition (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996) Journal and Magazine Articles Fischer Black and Myron Scholes The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities Journal of Political Economy, May 9 1972 Timothy A. Luehrman, Whats It Worth A General Managers Guide to Valuation, Harvard Business Review May-June 1997 Timothy A. Luehrman, Investment Opportunities as Real Options: Getting Started on the Numbers, Harvard Business Review July-August 1998 Timothy A. Luehrman, Strategy as a Portfolio of Real Options Harvard Business Review September-October 1998 Timothy A. Leuhrman, Capital Projects as Real Options: An Introduction Harvard Business School Case Study 9-295-074 March 22, 1995 Avinash K. Dixit and Robert S. Pindyck, The Options Approach to Capital Investment Harvard Business Review May-June 1995 Keith J. Leslie and Max P. Michaels, The Real Power of Real Options The McKinsey Quarterly 1997 Number 3 Michael E. Edleson, Real Options: Valuing Managerial Flexibility Harvard Business School Case Study 9-294-109 June 4, 1999 Aswath Damodaran, The Promise and Peril of Real Options Stern School of Business web site, adamodar@stern.nyu.edu Michael J. Mauboussin Get Real: Using Real Options in Security Analysis Credit Suisse First Boston, 1999 F. Peter Boer Financial Management of R&D 2002 paper downloaded from www.tigerscientific.com F. Peter Boer Valuation of Techology Using Real Options paper downloaded from www.tigerscientific.com F. Peter Boer Traps, Pitfalls and Snares in the Valuation of Technology paper downloaded from www.tigerscientific.com Peter Coy Exploiting Uncertainty Business Week June 7, 1999 Thomas E. Copeland and Philip T. Keenan Making Real Options Real The McKinsey Quarterly 1998 Number 3 Thomas E. Copeland and Philip T. Keenan How Much is Flexibility Worth? The McKinsey Quarterly 1998 Number 2

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 32

Q&A

Real Options and Monte Carlo Modeling For New Product Development 25 March 2003

Page 33

- ResumeUploaded bysstyxer
- Real Options: HandbookUploaded byTonislav Enchev Enchev
- Options ArticleUploaded byChintan Bhagat
- Advanced_Financial_Accounting_and_Reporting.docUploaded bySurendra Gupta
- ch1Uploaded byNaoman Ch
- Black Scholes Model Report.docxUploaded byminhal
- Valuation of E&P Using Real Option ModelUploaded bysgabong
- Real Options LBSIMUploaded byashu khetan
- Basics of DerivativesUploaded bycutemoney
- FINMAN TB Chapter13 Capital Structure and LeverageUploaded bychin mohammad
- Barrier 2Uploaded byKrishnan Muralidharan
- Leung, Y.P.BUploaded byTulung Manulung
- 3G ExpansionUploaded byGokhan Kalem
- Real OptionsUploaded byAlex Wilson
- 04 Real Option AnalysisUploaded byanirban88095
- UpdateJune08Uploaded byapi-27370939
- Eric Sorensen - The Salomon Smith BaUploaded byjbiddy789
- Risk Management & Derivatives Unit 1Uploaded byrupeshdahake8586
- 023-2Uploaded byHenri Mastits
- Assignment 03Uploaded byRauan Zhakypbek
- Finquiz FSA AnswerUploaded byEdgar Lay
- Be Lecture 3Uploaded byamnoman17
- Practice SetUploaded bySubhamoy007
- RISK_1_1_011004Uploaded byyash_monu05
- MFM2 03 FeaturesUploaded byPinkush Gupta
- display_whitepaper.pdfUploaded byghasker
- JPM Correlations RMC 20151 KolanovicUploaded bydoc_oz3298
- 20180115Uploaded bySolkeyman
- Investment AppraisalUploaded byadam
- Port FolioUploaded byzulfi12345

- Excel Tutorial for Windows.xlsxUploaded byveda20
- Creditv Risk AnalysisUploaded byveda20
- Solution to MINI Case Course 2 Module 2Uploaded byveda20
- Venture Capital MarshallUploaded byveda20
- Valuation+Multiples+Quick+Sheet.docxUploaded byveda20
- 10th Ncert Exempler FullUploaded byAnish Talwar
- Ecch Best 12Uploaded byveda20
- How to Crack NEETUploaded byveda20
- Brochure 2016 17Uploaded byveda20
- Are you sure you have a strategy.pptxUploaded byveda20
- Portfolio SelectionUploaded byMego Plamonia
- EMBA Derivatives (Zurack) FA2016Uploaded byveda20
- Valuing an Early Stage CompanyUploaded byveda20
- Portfolio Optimization - Many AssetsUploaded byveda20
- Brochure Wharton Business Analytics 03 May 19 V36Uploaded byveda20
- HIV_treeUploaded byveda20
- What You Should DoUploaded byveda20
- Risk Aware InvestmentUploaded byveda20
- NotesUploaded byveda20
- Pooled_testing.pdfUploaded byveda20
- Probability by DiagramUploaded byveda20
- Living and Working in EuropeUploaded byveda20
- Exercises 1 on Probability, With AnswersUploaded byveda20
- II Bankloans OppUploaded byveda20
- Analyst DataUploaded byveda20
- Consumer Price Index Number for Industrial WorkersUploaded byveda20
- Alternative Beta Risk Premia Investing That is More Targeted in Nature Than Broad Market Beta en (1) (1)Uploaded byveda20
- Nonresponse BiasUploaded byveda20
- CBV Article Business Valuation101Uploaded byHassan Rizvi
- Global MBA BrochureUploaded byveda20

- Achieving a Market-led CultureUploaded bymilla1979
- Director Product Management Wireless in MD Resume Christopher RobertsUploaded byChristopherRoberts1
- Engineering Project Product Manager in Portland OR Resume Erik PiersonUploaded byErikPierson
- Elective iUploaded byKuldeep Bhattacharjee
- Automotive DevelopmentUploaded byOscar Al Kant
- D Banig Resume 2010Uploaded bydavidbanig
- Siemens PLM Matsushita Electronics Cs Z6Uploaded byrasgeetsingh
- QbD: A contract organization perspectiveUploaded byshah777
- Director Of EngineeringUploaded byapi-78751592
- Quiz QuestionsUploaded byJolly Sushma
- knowledge managementUploaded byrosyphutela
- cadceusUploaded byUmbrass
- NTU Education (BRC Course Content).pdfUploaded bypearlyn
- artigo 01Uploaded byStela Britto
- VP Operations General Counsel In Greater Hartford CT Resume Richard MitchellUploaded byRichard Mitchell
- 080701 Deming Prize WinnersUploaded byhaihuyenphong
- 2181913 PemUploaded byR C Shah Subhamengineers
- wp_07_Benchmarking Best Practices Performance Results and the Role of Senior ManagementUploaded bykuruvillaj2217
- Brand DecisionsUploaded bysonalidhanokar9784
- Product Development Brand Manager in NJ Philadelphia PA Resume Daniel WinigradUploaded byDanielWinigrad
- Unit 1 - 2 MarksUploaded byshruthicivil
- peri-handbook-formwork-scaffolding-engineering.pdfUploaded byboctraian55
- Introduction to Production Management by KariUploaded byShashikant Kari
- Product Development P&GUploaded byjamilmelhem
- Manufacturing Cost Modelling for Concurrent Product DevelopmentUploaded bysuhel000
- 8 ContestUploaded byVivek Sah
- 22012016_Circular for DE 1B_2015-16Uploaded bykrunal07786
- Session-11 to 15 B2B MarketingUploaded byPawan Gupta
- Mini Project 2011Uploaded byFaizal Hakim
- Virtual Teams: a Literature ReviewUploaded bynicero88