Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
|
A
\ .
Q
2
2
S
O O
t
| |
+
|
A
\ .
Q
Q
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
i
n
m
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
i
n
m
for next time interval
Repetition of computations for
subsequent routing periods
RR
15 15
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Channel Routing- Muskingum Method
Hydrologic routing method for handling variable discharge
storage relationship.
St i f ti f b th tfl & i fl di h Storage is a function of both outflow & inflow discharges
Water surface in a channel reach is not only parallel to the
channel bottom but also varies with time
Models storage in channel-combination of wedge & prism
Prism storage: Volume that would exist if uniform flow
o ed at the do nst eam depth occurred at the downstream depth
Wedge storage : Wedge like volume formed between
actual water surface profile & top surface of prism storage p p p g
Inflow to
channel
Wedge storage
B d Ch t l(1988)
16 16
Outflow
from
channel
Prism storage
Based on Chow et.al(1988)
Channel Routing- Muskingum Method
During the advance of flood wave, inflow exceeds outflow
Positive wedge Positive wedge
During recession, outflow exceeds inflow Negative wedge
Assumption: Cross sectional area of the flood flow section is
d l l h d h h directly proportional to the discharge at the section
Volume of prism storage is equal to KO
Volume of the wedge storage is equal to KX(I - O) Volume of the wedge storage is equal to KX(I O)
K proportionality coefficient, X -weighing factor having
the range 0 < X < 0.5
Wedge storage
= KX(I-O)
Based on Chow et.al(1988)
Inflow to
channel
17 17
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Prism
storage=KO
( )
Channel Routing- Muskingum Method
Total storage: ---- Muskingum
storage equation g q
Linear model for routing flow in streams
Value of X depends on shape of modeled wedge storage
X = 0 for level pool storage (S = KO); X = 0 5 for a full X = 0 for level pool storage (S = KO); X = 0.5 for a full
wedge
K- Time of travel of flood wave through channel reaches
l f d b Values of storage at time j and j+1 can be written as
Change in storage over time interval t is
18 18
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Channel Routing- Muskingum Method
F h i i i From the continuity equation
Equating these two equations Equating these two equations
Simplifying.
----- Muskingums
routing equation routing equation
Where
Chow et al(1988)
19 19
Chow et.al(1988)
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Channel Routing- Muskingum Method
t should be so chosen that K > t > 2KX .. For best
results
If t < 2KX . Coefficient C
1
will be negative
Required input for Muskingum routing
Inflow hydrograph through a channel reach, Inflow hydrograph through a channel reach,
Values of K and X for the reach
Value of the outflow Oj from the reach at the start
F i h l h K & X t k For a given channel reach, K & X are taken as
constant
K is determined empirically (eg. Clarks method:
0 5
K=cL/s
0.5
; c constant; L length of stream,; s
mean slope of channel) or graphically.
X is determined by trial and error procedure
20 20
y p
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Muskingum Method - Procedure
Routing Procedure:
Knowing K and X, select an appropriate value of t
Calculate C1, C2, and C3
S f h l d k fl Starting from the initial conditions known inflow,
outflow, calculate the outflow for the next time step
Repeat the calculations for the entire inflow
hydrograph
21 21
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Flood Routing by St. Venant Equations
Physically based theory of flood propagation - from
the Saint Venant equations for gradually varying flow the Saint Venant equations for gradually varying flow
in open channels.
Hydraulic routing method
l fl d ll d fl d Flow as 1 D flow Gradually varied flow condition
Conservation of mass- continuity equation
Conservation of momentum Dynamic wave equation Conservation of momentum Dynamic wave equation
22 22
Hydrograph
at outlet of
watershed
Gov. Equation for Flow Routing
Equation of continuity
0 =
c
c
+
c
c
q
A Q
c c
q
t x
Momentum equation
( )
h
gA S S gA
Q Q c
|
|
|
|
c
+
c
2
( )
x
gA S S gA
A x t
f
c
=
|
|
.
\
c
+
c
0
q-lateral inflow; Q-discharge in the channel;
A-area of flow in the channel, S
0
-bed slope;
S
f
-friction slope of channel
23 23
S
f
friction slope of channel.
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Channel Flow- Diffusion &
Kinematic Kinematic
Diffusion
h c
0 =
c
+
c
q
A Q
Initial conditions
B d diti
f o
S S
x
h
=
c
c
2 / 1 3 / 2
1
c c
q
t x
Boundary conditions
Kinematic:
A S R
n
Q
f h
2 / 1 3 / 2
1
=
Kinematic:
S
0
=S
f
0 =
c
c
+
c
c
q
t
A
x
Q
24 24
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Solution Methodologies
Analytical method: simplified
governing equations, boundary
diti & t l ti l conditions & geometry, analytical
solutions can be obtained.
Computational method:
0 =
c
c
+
c
c
q
t
A
x
Q
p
solution is obtained with the help
of some approximate methods
using a computer. Commonly,
c
f
h
S S
x
c
=
c
using a computer. Commonly,
numerical methods (FDM, FEM,
FVM) are used to obtain solution
in the computational method
(2/3) (1/2)
1
c
f
Q R S A
n
=
in the computational method.
Finite Element Method:
| |{ } | |{ } | |{ } { }( )
t t t t t t
t t t
f Q Q B A C A C
A + A +
A +
A A u u u u ) 1 ( ) 1 (
( )
c i
k i
f i
h h
S S
L
=
25 25
| |{ } | |{ } | |{ } { }( )
t t t t t t
t t t
q q f t Q Q B t A C A C
A + A +
A +
+ A + + A = u u u u ) 1 ( ) 1 (
FEM Based Flood Routing Model
26 26
Flood Routing Flood Routing Case study Case study
Catchment Area 847.52 Ha
Elevation varies from 0.5 m to 227 m above MSL.
No of subcatchments 31 No of subcatchments 31
Rainfall event 26/07/ 2005; 15/07/2009
Length of channel 5271 m
FEM Li 80 Ch l l t
27 27
FEM Linear 80 Channel elements
Tidal Range 3.25 m to -1.0 m (design)
Case Study: Flood Routing
28 28
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Case Study: Flood Routing
60
80
100
Hyt ogr aph of Kal amboli r ai nf all
m
m
/
h
r
Hyetograph 26/07/2005
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0
20
40
R
a
i
n
f
a
l
l
Ti me st arti ng fr om12 hr
hr
29 29
Case Study: Flood Routing
15July2009 15July2009
Fig Comparison of observed Fig. Comparison of observed
and simulated stages
at chainage 5121 m on
15th July 2009
30 30
15th July 2009
References References
American Society of Civil Engineers and Water Environment
Federation (ASCE and WEF). 1998. Urban Runoff Quality
Management. WEF Manual of Practice No. 23, ASCE Manual and
Report on Engineering Practice No. 87.
http://ndma.gov.in/ndma/guidelines.html
http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/stormwater/index.htm
Subrahmanya, K(2007). Engineering Hydrology, Tata McGraw-Hill, Subrahmanya, K(2007). Engineering Hydrology, Tata McGraw Hill,
New Delhi, 294-300
Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., and Mays, L.W. (1988). Applied
Hydrology McGraw-Hill Inc New York Hydrology, McGraw Hill,Inc., New York
Bedient, P.B.,Huber, C.W. (1988). Hydrology and Flood Plain
Analysis, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
31 31 31 31
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Tutorials - Question!.?.
Study the various flood routing
methodologies in details and suggest methodologies in details and suggest
applications of each.
What are the software available for flood What are the software available for flood
routing?. ( routing?. (www.hec.usace.army.mil www.hec.usace.army.mil )
Evaluate the applications for various Evaluate the applications for various
problems such as reservoir routing/ channel problems such as reservoir routing/ channel
routing. routing.
32 32 32 32
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Self Evaluation - Questions!.
What is flood routing and where it is used?
E l i i ti Explain reservoir routing.
Differentiate between Puls method & Goodrich
method method.
Describe the Muskingum method of flood routing.
Describe the prism storage & wedge storage in a Describe the prism storage & wedge storage in a
channel.
What are the input data required for Muskingum What are the input data required for Muskingum
routing?.
33 33 33 33
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Assignment- Questions?. g Q
What are the motivations for flood routing?.
Describe different types and advantages of Describe different types and advantages of
flood routing.
Illustrate the channel routing procedure Illustrate the channel routing procedure.
Describe the lumped flow routing.
Di h i ll b d fl d ti i Discuss physically based flood routing in
channels by using St. Venant equations.
34 34 34 34
Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Dr. T. I. Eldho Dr. T. I. Eldho
Professor, Professor,
Department of Civil Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, p g g p g g
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,
Mumbai, India, 400 076. Mumbai, India, 400 076.
Email: Email: eldho@iitb.ac.in eldho@iitb.ac.in
35 35
Email: Email: eldho@iitb.ac.in eldho@iitb.ac.in
Phone: (022) Phone: (022) 25767339; Fax: 25767302 25767339; Fax: 25767302
http://www. http://www.civil.iitb.ac.in civil.iitb.ac.in