## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

by H. ASPDEN

**IBM United Kingdom Winchester, England
**

ABSTRACT:

Laboratories,

Ltd.

**The indeterminate elements can be deduced from
**

in

state of the empirical simple Newtonian interactions

law of electrodynamic of the law fully dynamics.

action to

between with

two current experiment

is reviewed.

It is shown that a form between

consistent

This law points

anomalies

chargein electric

to be expected

mass ratio.

electrodynamic

electric particles

of unequal anomalies

This result may account for certain hitherto unexplained phenomena.

discharge

introduction

A summary of the early development of the law of electrodynamic action between current elements is given by Tricker (1). He presents the basic paper of Ampere on this subject, and the criticisms sustained by Ampere’s law and alternative formulations by Biot and Savart and by Grassmann. Also mentioned is the general empirical formulation by Whittaker (2) in which he proposes a simplified new law based upon new assumptions. The common problem is that none of these laws is fully consistent with Newton’s Third Law when applied to interactions between individual elements of current. Yet, all the formulations appear to give the correct answers when used in integrated form to apply to interactions involving a closed circuit. Tricker then reaches the seemingly inevitable conclusion that an isolated element of steady current is a contradiction in terms, and thus leaves open the problem of how two electrons in motion really react owing to their electrodynamic interaction. Here, it is proposed to apply directly Newtonian principles to the problem of two interacting particles. From very simple considerations a formulation of the law of interaction is deduced which is fully consistent with the empirically derived general formula of electrodynamics but, oddly enough, is different from the laws deduced, by assumption, by Ampere, Biot and Savart, Grassmann, and Whittaker.

Empirical Analysis

Four basic empirical facts were relied upon by Ampere in deriving his law : (a) The effect of a current is reversed when the direction of the current is reversed. (b) The effect of a current flowing in a circuit twisted into small sinuosities is the same as if the circuit were smoothed out.

179

13*

or attract when carrying current in the same direction. The line from d7E to &’ is the vector distance F.&‘.F)Z~ r3 r3 I. Ic is arbitrary and depends upon the units chosen. disregarding Ampere’s assumption. In its simplest form. (d) The force between two elements of circuits is unaffected when all linear dimensions are increased proportionately.@ _ B(&z’)Z+3B(&F)(i&)F\ constants. Prom the analysis by Whittaker (2). However..F) ( r5 - 2(&X’) p3 1 r * (1) Here.~‘)r}.B(&‘. 180 Journal of The Franklin Institute . the law becomes P= ~{(~. with k and A both equal to unity. 3(z. F denotes the force acting upon an element z’ of a circuit of current strength i’ and due to a current i in an element z. and thus obtained his law: p = Eii. the general formulation consistent with obs&vations (a) to (d) is found to be: F = /&’ 3(&F)(Z’.Z7I.r)~‘+(~‘.~)~-(d7.i)F r5 ( 2(Z.+4&. This applies to the general formulation when A = B.Brief Communications (c) The force exerted by a closed circuit on an element of another circuit is at right angles to the latter. To satisfy observation (f) terms other than those in I must cancel when & is equal to . the current-strengths remaining unaltered. although its polarity may be determined by using the law to verify the observation : (e) Two extended parallel circuit elements in close proximity mutually repel one another when carrying current in opposite directions. This balance of torque action is not assured by the simple formulation of Whittaker in Eq. This involves equating A and -B. (3) Inspection shows that this formulation satisfies observation (e). . 3. Whittaker made no mention of the all-important experimental discovery of Trouton and Noble (3).r)(&‘. Whittaker (2) Here. Put another way: (f) There is no interaction torque out of balance between anti-parallel current elements. A and B denote arbitrary then assumed linear force balance as represented by symmetry in & and &‘. Ampere combined with the above the assumption that the force between two current elements acts along the line joining them. Their experiment demonstrated that separated charges in a capacitor resulted in no tendency for the capacitor to turn when in linear motion transverse to its suspension.

These two forces on m and m’ will. decreasing by %. Therefore. They are separated by the distance vector 7. Let V. m’b = ma.d. although we now have three force components.e.’ dt in V’ direction. tend to change. dt dt b a37 at The total force on m’ now becomes . decreasing by I%‘. No. We then remove the kinetic energy term and equate the remainder to zero. Consider the rate of energy change at m’. in the general case. tend to change. of m’. 4. the forces in the system must prevent an out-of-balance couple from asserting itself. This must -m(%/dt) arise from a force -m(&‘/dt) acting on m’ in the direction V’. This must arise acting on m in the direction V. i. February 1969 181 . The prime direct electrodynamic force induces acceleration in a particle and therefore the inertial reaction. on m we add the force : -m’-. On m’ we add the force: _m-%a Z = -_m’__. The centre of inertia of this two-particle system is taken to be distant a and b respectively from m and m’. Since there is no evidence that any system can begin to turn merely by its own internal interactions. two have arisen by action and reaction and one is really fictitious. This force is a fully balanced interaction force. where --F’ is the force we now assume to act directly on m’ as a result of its electrodynamic interaction with m. the velocity (4) of m. 287. Vol. produce a turning moment in the system. -m -m’c -i?f dt in V direction. the inertial reaction force component which could correspond to a turning action has been introduced in the inertial formulation but since it must be zero it has been offset by a balancing term. In summary. in F direction. For generality.iii’ b =-mdt a from Eq. 2. the velocity from a force Let V’. Then.Brief Communications Dynamic Analysis Consider now two particles of mass m and m’.

Further. i%’ where e denotes the electron charge in electromagnetic becomes.. the masses m and m’ become equal and since the effective current elements e5. d.21)21’ r -. it has been shown that a unique law of electrodynamics can be formulated as The odd thing about this is that the law thus deduced differs from that of AmpBre. (w. This result fully supports the belief that the isolated current element as a steady current element is contradictory.1 and B is . Of interest then is the fact that this force is exactly that deduced theoretically by evaluating the interaction component of the integrated magnetic field energy clue to the two current elements and assuming that it tends to increase.v )r units. However. Biot and Savart.Z’) r2 and.)v~(F. The inertial effects of the charge carriers are important to the understanding of the full law of electrodynamics. eZ’ may be written iz. 9 with Eq. For the particle of mass m’. We then develop the identity. (w. from observation (e). 8 If we now assume the particles to be electrons. If the masses of charge carriers in different parts of the same circuit are different the middle term in the above formulation has a coefficient equal to the mass ratio. Whittaker. Further. (9) A comparison of Eq. The comparison is satisfied if A is . 6 and 7 may be used to derive the general force expression p= ~-(q.‘)?)..s)o~-(.i. F. as expected from the basis of the analysis.. this satisfies observation (f). Eqs.Brief Communications Thus.’ mdt= 0 -c- F’ (F. = kii’(& . 2 shows it to be of the general form developed empirically by Whittaker. (6) Similarly for m. 182 Journal of The Franklin Institute . Eq. and Grassmann.1. with & = &’ realize that k is + 1. we have deduced that this law is only valid for interactions between charge elements of equal mass.v’) (7) We can now evaluate the resultant force acting on each particle.

(3) F. For example. Mere reaction momentum considerations lead to a relatively small cathode reaction force which is linearly dependent upon current. 1. 1965. (4) E. Phil. However. Trans. Vol. Sot. Noble. where i is the current in absolute units. p. Phys. 1636. There is no force action along the filament.Brief Communications Since this middle term represents a force component along the direction of current flow. This is of the order of 100i2. Some deeper understanding of the law will have practical consequences in discharge and plasma control. the m’lm factor to be used with the middle term of Eq. 36.No. It may be concluded that the resolution of this long-standing problem of the true nature of this basic electrodynamic law is not a mere academic topic. “The Mechanical Forces Acting on a Charged Condenser Moving Through Space”. R. T. pp. Kobel. Whittaker. London. (2) Sir E. Kobel (4) found an anomalous cathode reaction force of 250 dyn at 16 A and 1400 dyn at 35 A. This force is the product of the constituent ion current component squared and the ratio of the ion mass to the electron mass. for example. any element of current in a continuous filament is subjected to balancing forces from the filament current on either side. some manifestation of the predicted anomalous forces should appear in plasma work. bearing in mind that in a discharge at least some of the current at the electrodes suddenly is transported by ions and not electrons. Pergamon Press. we may predict that in a discharge circuit where electrons carry current in a cathode but positive ions contribute to the current to the cathode there will be an electrodynamic force manifested along the discharge. Rev. London. 1903. Forces of the order of lOOi as found by Kobel are therefore readily explained. R. A. Even using Eq. Oxford. 165-181. Nelson. Vol. 2.February 1969 183 . Vol. “Aether and Electricity”. 10 assumes importance. R.. It works out that there is an out-of-balance force productive of a cathode reaction by impact from the ions. References (1) R. On one side of this current junction at the cathode electrons act upon ions in the discharge and on the other side ions act on ions. Many authors have found anomalous cathode reaction forces in discharge studies. Tricker. 202A.087. This quadrature current phenomenon has defied explanation. This also applies to the classical formulations of the electrodynamic law. 1951. 1930. Trouton and H. New York. Similarly. “Early Electrodynamics”.

- 09 electric current 2009
- Ointophoresis 2
- Us 20140332577
- basic.pdf
- - Vacuum Circuit Breaker Current-Zero Phenomena
- Graneau Paper on Water Explosions
- EKchronicles
- Arc Blow Simulaion WJ_1976_04_s108.PDF
- 165487 SPandcaves Modeling
- What is a fuel cell
- Teléfonos_táctiles
- IB Mechanics PPQ
- Osram Microlithography Hbo
- Electricity and Magnetism
- Module 3
- f (Ictchslmgrade 9module2 Feb2) - Copy
- Unit II Current Electricitiy
- Hissan Physics Set A and B
- 1233Chapter 2 Form 5
- Sci Ch 8
- Arduino Comic Latest
- EE Safety Report.ppt
- 001 Electronics Reviewer
- Physics AS Facts.docx
- HW10Solutions
- 0JS.461.397C Operating and Maintainning Instruction for Generator
- 29006_L26.pdf
- CH-01 Deleted Deleted
- TEKNOLOGI ELEKTRIK 1 - Voltage
- Lecture 4 - Sensor Interface Circuits

- ja00880a025.pdf
- Schafer Redox State 1
- 124872669 Aspden Power From Water Cold Fusion Part 1 1994
- Kinetic Decomposition of Ozone and Para-chlorobenzoic Acid (PCBA) During Catalytic Ozonation
- 110182840 Aspden Synchronous Lattice Electrodynamics as an Alternative to Time Dilation 1987
- System Mapping Radical Oxidation Pathways
- Science 2010 Larsen 65 9
- 110182934 Aspden the Theory of the Proton Constants 1988
- 110182901 Aspden the Theoretical Nature of the Neutron and the Deuteron 1986
- Qr 9672100079
- 81248763 Herbert v Guenther the Tantric View of Life
- JChemPhys_92_3980
- redox
- Fenton Chemistry
- Schafer Redox State 2
- Aetherometric Biology - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Atos
- Aether - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Steinmetz CPElectrical Discharges Waves and Impulses 2ndEd
- 82
- Andrew Harvey - RadiantHeart.nfo
- Aetherometric Mathematics - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Aetherometric Natural Philosophy - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Nanometric Functions of Bioenergy - Front Matter
- Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Electrochemical+Series
- c1cp21803d
- Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity - Encyclopedia Nomadic
- Aetherometric Technologies - Encyclopedia Nomadica

Close Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Loading