## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

by H. ASPDEN

**IBM United Kingdom Winchester, England
**

ABSTRACT:

Laboratories,

Ltd.

**The indeterminate elements can be deduced from
**

in

state of the empirical simple Newtonian interactions

law of electrodynamic of the law fully dynamics.

action to

between with

two current experiment

is reviewed.

It is shown that a form between

consistent

This law points

anomalies

chargein electric

to be expected

mass ratio.

electrodynamic

electric particles

of unequal anomalies

This result may account for certain hitherto unexplained phenomena.

discharge

introduction

A summary of the early development of the law of electrodynamic action between current elements is given by Tricker (1). He presents the basic paper of Ampere on this subject, and the criticisms sustained by Ampere’s law and alternative formulations by Biot and Savart and by Grassmann. Also mentioned is the general empirical formulation by Whittaker (2) in which he proposes a simplified new law based upon new assumptions. The common problem is that none of these laws is fully consistent with Newton’s Third Law when applied to interactions between individual elements of current. Yet, all the formulations appear to give the correct answers when used in integrated form to apply to interactions involving a closed circuit. Tricker then reaches the seemingly inevitable conclusion that an isolated element of steady current is a contradiction in terms, and thus leaves open the problem of how two electrons in motion really react owing to their electrodynamic interaction. Here, it is proposed to apply directly Newtonian principles to the problem of two interacting particles. From very simple considerations a formulation of the law of interaction is deduced which is fully consistent with the empirically derived general formula of electrodynamics but, oddly enough, is different from the laws deduced, by assumption, by Ampere, Biot and Savart, Grassmann, and Whittaker.

Empirical Analysis

Four basic empirical facts were relied upon by Ampere in deriving his law : (a) The effect of a current is reversed when the direction of the current is reversed. (b) The effect of a current flowing in a circuit twisted into small sinuosities is the same as if the circuit were smoothed out.

179

13*

The line from d7E to &’ is the vector distance F. To satisfy observation (f) terms other than those in I must cancel when & is equal to . with k and A both equal to unity. the law becomes P= ~{(~. Whittaker made no mention of the all-important experimental discovery of Trouton and Noble (3).Z7I.F) ( r5 - 2(&X’) p3 1 r * (1) Here. the current-strengths remaining unaltered. However. and thus obtained his law: p = Eii. F denotes the force acting upon an element z’ of a circuit of current strength i’ and due to a current i in an element z. This applies to the general formulation when A = B. Prom the analysis by Whittaker (2).~‘)r}.i)F r5 ( 2(Z. Their experiment demonstrated that separated charges in a capacitor resulted in no tendency for the capacitor to turn when in linear motion transverse to its suspension.r)(&‘. (3) Inspection shows that this formulation satisfies observation (e). (d) The force between two elements of circuits is unaffected when all linear dimensions are increased proportionately. Whittaker (2) Here.. 3(z. Put another way: (f) There is no interaction torque out of balance between anti-parallel current elements. In its simplest form. disregarding Ampere’s assumption. 3. This involves equating A and -B. although its polarity may be determined by using the law to verify the observation : (e) Two extended parallel circuit elements in close proximity mutually repel one another when carrying current in opposite directions.~)~-(d7. the general formulation consistent with obs&vations (a) to (d) is found to be: F = /&’ 3(&F)(Z’.&‘. 180 Journal of The Franklin Institute . Ic is arbitrary and depends upon the units chosen. or attract when carrying current in the same direction. .Brief Communications (c) The force exerted by a closed circuit on an element of another circuit is at right angles to the latter. A and B denote arbitrary then assumed linear force balance as represented by symmetry in & and &‘.B(&‘.r)~‘+(~‘. This balance of torque action is not assured by the simple formulation of Whittaker in Eq.@ _ B(&z’)Z+3B(&F)(i&)F\ constants.+4&. Ampere combined with the above the assumption that the force between two current elements acts along the line joining them.F)Z~ r3 r3 I.

On m’ we add the force: _m-%a Z = -_m’__. two have arisen by action and reaction and one is really fictitious. Since there is no evidence that any system can begin to turn merely by its own internal interactions. 287. although we now have three force components. In summary. This force is a fully balanced interaction force. The centre of inertia of this two-particle system is taken to be distant a and b respectively from m and m’. where --F’ is the force we now assume to act directly on m’ as a result of its electrodynamic interaction with m. m’b = ma. decreasing by %. decreasing by I%‘.e. tend to change.’ dt in V’ direction. dt dt b a37 at The total force on m’ now becomes . in F direction. the velocity from a force Let V’. i. -m -m’c -i?f dt in V direction. the forces in the system must prevent an out-of-balance couple from asserting itself. Therefore. For generality. produce a turning moment in the system. the inertial reaction force component which could correspond to a turning action has been introduced in the inertial formulation but since it must be zero it has been offset by a balancing term. February 1969 181 . of m’. These two forces on m and m’ will. Then. on m we add the force : -m’-.Brief Communications Dynamic Analysis Consider now two particles of mass m and m’. They are separated by the distance vector 7. tend to change. We then remove the kinetic energy term and equate the remainder to zero.d. Vol. The prime direct electrodynamic force induces acceleration in a particle and therefore the inertial reaction. This must arise acting on m in the direction V. the velocity (4) of m. This must -m(%/dt) arise from a force -m(&‘/dt) acting on m’ in the direction V’. Consider the rate of energy change at m’. No. Let V. 2. 4. in the general case.iii’ b =-mdt a from Eq.

1 and B is . If the masses of charge carriers in different parts of the same circuit are different the middle term in the above formulation has a coefficient equal to the mass ratio. The comparison is satisfied if A is .Brief Communications Thus.s)o~-(.v’) (7) We can now evaluate the resultant force acting on each particle.. This result fully supports the belief that the isolated current element as a steady current element is contradictory. The inertial effects of the charge carriers are important to the understanding of the full law of electrodynamics. 8 If we now assume the particles to be electrons.)v~(F.v )r units. Whittaker. (6) Similarly for m. For the particle of mass m’. = kii’(& . However. as expected from the basis of the analysis. it has been shown that a unique law of electrodynamics can be formulated as The odd thing about this is that the law thus deduced differs from that of AmpBre.21)21’ r -. eZ’ may be written iz. 9 with Eq. Eqs. F. we have deduced that this law is only valid for interactions between charge elements of equal mass.Z’) r2 and.1.. d.. Further. Eq. 6 and 7 may be used to derive the general force expression p= ~-(q. (w. (w. We then develop the identity.‘)?). Further. 182 Journal of The Franklin Institute . this satisfies observation (f). with & = &’ realize that k is + 1. and Grassmann.i. 2 shows it to be of the general form developed empirically by Whittaker. Biot and Savart. (9) A comparison of Eq.’ mdt= 0 -c- F’ (F. from observation (e). Of interest then is the fact that this force is exactly that deduced theoretically by evaluating the interaction component of the integrated magnetic field energy clue to the two current elements and assuming that it tends to increase. i%’ where e denotes the electron charge in electromagnetic becomes. the masses m and m’ become equal and since the effective current elements e5.

No. This force is the product of the constituent ion current component squared and the ratio of the ion mass to the electron mass. some manifestation of the predicted anomalous forces should appear in plasma work. Phil. This is of the order of 100i2. Nelson. This quadrature current phenomenon has defied explanation. Many authors have found anomalous cathode reaction forces in discharge studies. Trouton and H. “Early Electrodynamics”. 1. On one side of this current junction at the cathode electrons act upon ions in the discharge and on the other side ions act on ions. Vol. Similarly. 202A. where i is the current in absolute units. London. For example. 1636. Sot. Forces of the order of lOOi as found by Kobel are therefore readily explained.February 1969 183 . Phys. 1951. Vol. Noble. 1903. There is no force action along the filament. for example. Tricker. Pergamon Press. Oxford. (4) E.Brief Communications Since this middle term represents a force component along the direction of current flow. p. It works out that there is an out-of-balance force productive of a cathode reaction by impact from the ions. (2) Sir E. New York. Rev.. Mere reaction momentum considerations lead to a relatively small cathode reaction force which is linearly dependent upon current. References (1) R. 2.087. Kobel (4) found an anomalous cathode reaction force of 250 dyn at 16 A and 1400 dyn at 35 A. Even using Eq. 1930. It may be concluded that the resolution of this long-standing problem of the true nature of this basic electrodynamic law is not a mere academic topic. bearing in mind that in a discharge at least some of the current at the electrodes suddenly is transported by ions and not electrons. 36. the m’lm factor to be used with the middle term of Eq. 1965. Vol. This also applies to the classical formulations of the electrodynamic law. Whittaker. London. T. 165-181. However. A. “The Mechanical Forces Acting on a Charged Condenser Moving Through Space”. R. we may predict that in a discharge circuit where electrons carry current in a cathode but positive ions contribute to the current to the cathode there will be an electrodynamic force manifested along the discharge. R. any element of current in a continuous filament is subjected to balancing forces from the filament current on either side. Some deeper understanding of the law will have practical consequences in discharge and plasma control. “Aether and Electricity”. Kobel. (3) F. 10 assumes importance. Trans. R. pp.

- 01 electric circuits web 2016auploaded byapi-240330821
- Zhou-mte113-2013uploaded bywsmischke
- Sci Ch 8uploaded byFSCK
- Units of Electricityuploaded byMSM7865
- nulluploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- The Electron Capture Detector Theoryuploaded byVarun Kumar
- Electric Circuitsuploaded byChirag Nagpal
- Resourcesuploaded byVibhu Mittal
- auploaded byclarkkent2
- EN(749)uploaded byreacharunk
- 5334uploaded byLipika Gayen
- HSCH-7-7-17-PLuploaded byameya85
- M Abdel-Salam 1976 J. Phys. D%3A Appl. Phys. 9 003uploaded byIsaac Garcia
- Ch17 Ch20 Solutionsuploaded bymamaemtoloko
- Graneau Paper on Water Explosionsuploaded bybisquick_anonymous
- RPT SAINS TAHUN 6uploaded byTasaratha Rajan Anamalai
- Assignmentuploaded bydasohamath
- Resultant T1 Theoryuploaded byAnand Balaji
- Carbon Nanotubeuploaded byNatalia Moreno Moreno
- I Feel Good When the Door Cracksuploaded byDanielAlvarezGorozpe
- Solar Pv Basicsuploaded byVenkatesh Hemadribhotla
- STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLER WITH CONSTRAINTSVARIATION FOR MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEMuploaded byijsret
- 5e lesson planuploaded byapi-347848921
- science paperuploaded byapi-325740775
- Electricity Notes 3uploaded byJimena Yo
- Hamyoung rele estado solido.pdfuploaded byEdison Benjamin Consuegra Chalen
- NGSS CA Framework: Grades 3-5uploaded byStefanie
- daoxinquanlunuploaded byarran
- Induced Voltage and Current in Parallel Transmission Lines: Causes and Concernsuploaded byJCuchapin
- Comprehensive Exam Iuploaded byappuamreddy

- System Mapping Radical Oxidation Pathwaysuploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- 110182840 Aspden Synchronous Lattice Electrodynamics as an Alternative to Time Dilation 1987uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- 124872669 Aspden Power From Water Cold Fusion Part 1 1994uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Kinetic Decomposition of Ozone and Para-chlorobenzoic Acid (PCBA) During Catalytic Ozonationuploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Schafer Redox State 1uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- ja00880a025.pdfuploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- redoxuploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Fenton Chemistryuploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Schafer Redox State 2uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- JChemPhys_92_3980uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Qr 9672100079uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- 81248763 Herbert v Guenther the Tantric View of Lifeuploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- 110182901 Aspden the Theoretical Nature of the Neutron and the Deuteron 1986uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- 110182934 Aspden the Theory of the Proton Constants 1988uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Science 2010 Larsen 65 9uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Aetherometric Natural Philosophy - Encyclopedia Nomadicauploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Nanometric Functions of Bioenergy - Front Matteruploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Aetherometric Mathematics - Encyclopedia Nomadicauploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Steinmetz CPElectrical Discharges Waves and Impulses 2ndEduploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- 82uploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Andrew Harvey - RadiantHeart.nfouploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Atosuploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Aether - Encyclopedia Nomadicauploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Aetherometric Biology - Encyclopedia Nomadicauploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Aetherometric Technologies - Encyclopedia Nomadicauploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity - Encyclopedia Nomadicuploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity - Encyclopedia Nomadicauploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- c1cp21803duploaded byMycoLogist4Life
- Electrochemical+Seriesuploaded byMycoLogist4Life

Close Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Loading