## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

by H. ASPDEN

**IBM United Kingdom Winchester, England
**

ABSTRACT:

Laboratories,

Ltd.

**The indeterminate elements can be deduced from
**

in

state of the empirical simple Newtonian interactions

law of electrodynamic of the law fully dynamics.

action to

between with

two current experiment

is reviewed.

It is shown that a form between

consistent

This law points

anomalies

chargein electric

to be expected

mass ratio.

electrodynamic

electric particles

of unequal anomalies

This result may account for certain hitherto unexplained phenomena.

discharge

introduction

A summary of the early development of the law of electrodynamic action between current elements is given by Tricker (1). He presents the basic paper of Ampere on this subject, and the criticisms sustained by Ampere’s law and alternative formulations by Biot and Savart and by Grassmann. Also mentioned is the general empirical formulation by Whittaker (2) in which he proposes a simplified new law based upon new assumptions. The common problem is that none of these laws is fully consistent with Newton’s Third Law when applied to interactions between individual elements of current. Yet, all the formulations appear to give the correct answers when used in integrated form to apply to interactions involving a closed circuit. Tricker then reaches the seemingly inevitable conclusion that an isolated element of steady current is a contradiction in terms, and thus leaves open the problem of how two electrons in motion really react owing to their electrodynamic interaction. Here, it is proposed to apply directly Newtonian principles to the problem of two interacting particles. From very simple considerations a formulation of the law of interaction is deduced which is fully consistent with the empirically derived general formula of electrodynamics but, oddly enough, is different from the laws deduced, by assumption, by Ampere, Biot and Savart, Grassmann, and Whittaker.

Empirical Analysis

Four basic empirical facts were relied upon by Ampere in deriving his law : (a) The effect of a current is reversed when the direction of the current is reversed. (b) The effect of a current flowing in a circuit twisted into small sinuosities is the same as if the circuit were smoothed out.

179

13*

i)F r5 ( 2(Z.F)Z~ r3 r3 I. the current-strengths remaining unaltered. To satisfy observation (f) terms other than those in I must cancel when & is equal to . Whittaker made no mention of the all-important experimental discovery of Trouton and Noble (3). Put another way: (f) There is no interaction torque out of balance between anti-parallel current elements.&‘.r)~‘+(~‘. with k and A both equal to unity. Prom the analysis by Whittaker (2).~‘)r}.F) ( r5 - 2(&X’) p3 1 r * (1) Here. and thus obtained his law: p = Eii.Z7I. Ic is arbitrary and depends upon the units chosen. 3.B(&‘. (d) The force between two elements of circuits is unaffected when all linear dimensions are increased proportionately. In its simplest form. 3(z. Whittaker (2) Here.@ _ B(&z’)Z+3B(&F)(i&)F\ constants. This balance of torque action is not assured by the simple formulation of Whittaker in Eq. the law becomes P= ~{(~.~)~-(d7. disregarding Ampere’s assumption. This applies to the general formulation when A = B. or attract when carrying current in the same direction. However. The line from d7E to &’ is the vector distance F. . (3) Inspection shows that this formulation satisfies observation (e). This involves equating A and -B. Their experiment demonstrated that separated charges in a capacitor resulted in no tendency for the capacitor to turn when in linear motion transverse to its suspension. Ampere combined with the above the assumption that the force between two current elements acts along the line joining them..r)(&‘.+4&. although its polarity may be determined by using the law to verify the observation : (e) Two extended parallel circuit elements in close proximity mutually repel one another when carrying current in opposite directions. A and B denote arbitrary then assumed linear force balance as represented by symmetry in & and &‘. F denotes the force acting upon an element z’ of a circuit of current strength i’ and due to a current i in an element z. 180 Journal of The Franklin Institute . the general formulation consistent with obs&vations (a) to (d) is found to be: F = /&’ 3(&F)(Z’.Brief Communications (c) The force exerted by a closed circuit on an element of another circuit is at right angles to the latter.

Then. tend to change. i. the velocity (4) of m.iii’ b =-mdt a from Eq. tend to change. -m -m’c -i?f dt in V direction. This must -m(%/dt) arise from a force -m(&‘/dt) acting on m’ in the direction V’. On m’ we add the force: _m-%a Z = -_m’__. They are separated by the distance vector 7. The centre of inertia of this two-particle system is taken to be distant a and b respectively from m and m’. Therefore. the velocity from a force Let V’. two have arisen by action and reaction and one is really fictitious. produce a turning moment in the system. 4. in the general case. In summary. Since there is no evidence that any system can begin to turn merely by its own internal interactions.d. dt dt b a37 at The total force on m’ now becomes .’ dt in V’ direction. These two forces on m and m’ will. in F direction.e. This must arise acting on m in the direction V. the inertial reaction force component which could correspond to a turning action has been introduced in the inertial formulation but since it must be zero it has been offset by a balancing term. decreasing by %. on m we add the force : -m’-. Vol. February 1969 181 . where --F’ is the force we now assume to act directly on m’ as a result of its electrodynamic interaction with m. We then remove the kinetic energy term and equate the remainder to zero. The prime direct electrodynamic force induces acceleration in a particle and therefore the inertial reaction. the forces in the system must prevent an out-of-balance couple from asserting itself. of m’. decreasing by I%‘. although we now have three force components. This force is a fully balanced interaction force. m’b = ma. 2. Let V.Brief Communications Dynamic Analysis Consider now two particles of mass m and m’. Consider the rate of energy change at m’. 287. For generality. No.

Whittaker. 8 If we now assume the particles to be electrons. This result fully supports the belief that the isolated current element as a steady current element is contradictory. 2 shows it to be of the general form developed empirically by Whittaker.1. 182 Journal of The Franklin Institute . (w. it has been shown that a unique law of electrodynamics can be formulated as The odd thing about this is that the law thus deduced differs from that of AmpBre. (9) A comparison of Eq. We then develop the identity.. Eq.Brief Communications Thus. Further. For the particle of mass m’. Of interest then is the fact that this force is exactly that deduced theoretically by evaluating the interaction component of the integrated magnetic field energy clue to the two current elements and assuming that it tends to increase.v’) (7) We can now evaluate the resultant force acting on each particle. as expected from the basis of the analysis. d. 6 and 7 may be used to derive the general force expression p= ~-(q. Eqs. Biot and Savart. F. (6) Similarly for m. Further. with & = &’ realize that k is + 1. we have deduced that this law is only valid for interactions between charge elements of equal mass. However.1 and B is . (w.)v~(F.. = kii’(& . this satisfies observation (f). i%’ where e denotes the electron charge in electromagnetic becomes. The comparison is satisfied if A is .v )r units. The inertial effects of the charge carriers are important to the understanding of the full law of electrodynamics. eZ’ may be written iz. If the masses of charge carriers in different parts of the same circuit are different the middle term in the above formulation has a coefficient equal to the mass ratio.s)o~-(.i.’ mdt= 0 -c- F’ (F.21)21’ r -.Z’) r2 and.‘)?). 9 with Eq. from observation (e). the masses m and m’ become equal and since the effective current elements e5.. and Grassmann.

p. This also applies to the classical formulations of the electrodynamic law. On one side of this current junction at the cathode electrons act upon ions in the discharge and on the other side ions act on ions. 1. pp. any element of current in a continuous filament is subjected to balancing forces from the filament current on either side.February 1969 183 . Vol. 2. 1903. For example. “The Mechanical Forces Acting on a Charged Condenser Moving Through Space”. Pergamon Press. R. Some deeper understanding of the law will have practical consequences in discharge and plasma control. bearing in mind that in a discharge at least some of the current at the electrodes suddenly is transported by ions and not electrons. (4) E. Even using Eq. Oxford. There is no force action along the filament.087. (3) F. 165-181. 1951. we may predict that in a discharge circuit where electrons carry current in a cathode but positive ions contribute to the current to the cathode there will be an electrodynamic force manifested along the discharge. This quadrature current phenomenon has defied explanation. Noble. (2) Sir E. T. Phil. R. where i is the current in absolute units. London. Phys. Sot. the m’lm factor to be used with the middle term of Eq. However. for example. Nelson. Similarly. This force is the product of the constituent ion current component squared and the ratio of the ion mass to the electron mass. 10 assumes importance. Trouton and H. 1636.No. References (1) R. Tricker. Rev. “Early Electrodynamics”. A. Kobel. some manifestation of the predicted anomalous forces should appear in plasma work. It may be concluded that the resolution of this long-standing problem of the true nature of this basic electrodynamic law is not a mere academic topic. Whittaker. Mere reaction momentum considerations lead to a relatively small cathode reaction force which is linearly dependent upon current. It works out that there is an out-of-balance force productive of a cathode reaction by impact from the ions.Brief Communications Since this middle term represents a force component along the direction of current flow. 1930. Forces of the order of lOOi as found by Kobel are therefore readily explained. Kobel (4) found an anomalous cathode reaction force of 250 dyn at 16 A and 1400 dyn at 35 A. Vol. “Aether and Electricity”. London. Vol. New York.. Trans. 1965. 36. Many authors have found anomalous cathode reaction forces in discharge studies. 202A. R. This is of the order of 100i2.

- Glossary
- Physics Glossary
- Physics
- About Aloevara
- _2_Chem_Tips
- Report
- Graneau Paper on Water Explosions
- dian ayu LBM 4 KGD
- Electrical Engineering Dictionary
- Lecture-14-Electrical Method -Field Curve & Interpretation
- 03-04-14 Sr.iit All Streams & Lt-iit Phase-II JEE-Main GTM-6 Q'Paper-p19u9undbj1b7319mpv91bd54
- Res IP SM in Amethyst Valley
- Modern Fi Zik
- Chromium Plating Processes
- Notes Et Idées
- ALFA-SL-M-LAURA-USA
- Pre Foundation for class IX by Career point kota
- Power Swings and Distance Relaying mnmnj
- Solved Electricity Numerical for Class 10
- 9468.doc
- Preface
- Lab1 DC Motor Speed Control
- Cables
- Et_b1_2008e (2 - Residual Current Protective Devices)
- Copy of first page springer Generation of Gas Discharge Plasma by an Arc Source with a Cold Hollow Cathode, P. M. Schanin, N. N. Koval and Yu. Kh. Akhmadeev
- Mechanisms, Procedures, And Instruments to Detect Faults and Defects of Electro Optical Oceanic Cable Arrays in SSW vs FW
- ece terminologySRK
- Lesson Planning - Force Interactions
- Topic 2 Ohms' Law, Energy and Power
- Syllabus IX-2013.pdf

- tmpF24A.tmp
- As 4827.1-2008 Coating Defect Surveys for Buried Pipelines Direct Current Voltage Gradient (DCVG)
- As 2832.5-2008 Cathodic Protection of Metals Steel in Concrete Structures
- tmp736A.tmp
- tmp87D5
- As 2832.2-2003 Cathodic Protection of Metals Compact Buried Structures
- As 2832.4-2006 Cathodic Protection of Metals Internal Surfaces
- tmpF4D3.tmp
- tmpC555.tmp
- tmp53D9
- As 2832.1-2004 Cathodic Protection of Metals Pipes and Cables
- As 4832-2007 Cathodic Protection - Installation of Galvanic Sacrificial Anodes in Soil
- As 2239-2003 Galvanic (Sacrificial) Anodes for Cathodic Protection
- tmp631F.tmp
- Lillian McCullough Berghane v. Radio Corporation of America, 217 F.2d 490, 3rd Cir. (1954)
- As 4352-2005 Tests for Coating Resistance to Cathodic Disbonding
- tmpD7F4.tmp
- tmpFFDC.tmp
- As 3685-1998 Recommended Procedures and Principles of Glow Discharge Mass Spectrometry (GD-MS)
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co, 179 F.2d 293, 3rd Cir. (1950)
- As 2832.3-2005 Cathodic Protection of Metals Fixed Immersed Structures

- ja00880a025.pdf
- Schafer Redox State 1
- 124872669 Aspden Power From Water Cold Fusion Part 1 1994
- Kinetic Decomposition of Ozone and Para-chlorobenzoic Acid (PCBA) During Catalytic Ozonation
- 110182840 Aspden Synchronous Lattice Electrodynamics as an Alternative to Time Dilation 1987
- System Mapping Radical Oxidation Pathways
- Science 2010 Larsen 65 9
- 110182934 Aspden the Theory of the Proton Constants 1988
- 110182901 Aspden the Theoretical Nature of the Neutron and the Deuteron 1986
- 81248763 Herbert v Guenther the Tantric View of Life
- Qr 9672100079
- JChemPhys_92_3980
- redox
- Fenton Chemistry
- Schafer Redox State 2
- Aetherometric Biology - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Aether - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Atos
- Andrew Harvey - RadiantHeart.nfo
- 82
- Steinmetz CPElectrical Discharges Waves and Impulses 2ndEd
- Aetherometric Mathematics - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Aetherometric Natural Philosophy - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Nanometric Functions of Bioenergy - Front Matter
- Electrochemical+Series
- c1cp21803d
- Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity - Encyclopedia Nomadic
- Aetherometric Technologies - Encyclopedia Nomadica

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading