## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

by H. ASPDEN

**IBM United Kingdom Winchester, England
**

ABSTRACT:

Laboratories,

Ltd.

**The indeterminate elements can be deduced from
**

in

state of the empirical simple Newtonian interactions

law of electrodynamic of the law fully dynamics.

action to

between with

two current experiment

is reviewed.

It is shown that a form between

consistent

This law points

anomalies

chargein electric

to be expected

mass ratio.

electrodynamic

electric particles

of unequal anomalies

This result may account for certain hitherto unexplained phenomena.

discharge

introduction

A summary of the early development of the law of electrodynamic action between current elements is given by Tricker (1). He presents the basic paper of Ampere on this subject, and the criticisms sustained by Ampere’s law and alternative formulations by Biot and Savart and by Grassmann. Also mentioned is the general empirical formulation by Whittaker (2) in which he proposes a simplified new law based upon new assumptions. The common problem is that none of these laws is fully consistent with Newton’s Third Law when applied to interactions between individual elements of current. Yet, all the formulations appear to give the correct answers when used in integrated form to apply to interactions involving a closed circuit. Tricker then reaches the seemingly inevitable conclusion that an isolated element of steady current is a contradiction in terms, and thus leaves open the problem of how two electrons in motion really react owing to their electrodynamic interaction. Here, it is proposed to apply directly Newtonian principles to the problem of two interacting particles. From very simple considerations a formulation of the law of interaction is deduced which is fully consistent with the empirically derived general formula of electrodynamics but, oddly enough, is different from the laws deduced, by assumption, by Ampere, Biot and Savart, Grassmann, and Whittaker.

Empirical Analysis

Four basic empirical facts were relied upon by Ampere in deriving his law : (a) The effect of a current is reversed when the direction of the current is reversed. (b) The effect of a current flowing in a circuit twisted into small sinuosities is the same as if the circuit were smoothed out.

179

13*

Ic is arbitrary and depends upon the units chosen. This involves equating A and -B. the law becomes P= ~{(~.@ _ B(&z’)Z+3B(&F)(i&)F\ constants. 3(z.r)~‘+(~‘. In its simplest form. . 3. F denotes the force acting upon an element z’ of a circuit of current strength i’ and due to a current i in an element z.Brief Communications (c) The force exerted by a closed circuit on an element of another circuit is at right angles to the latter. This balance of torque action is not assured by the simple formulation of Whittaker in Eq. This applies to the general formulation when A = B.~‘)r}. (3) Inspection shows that this formulation satisfies observation (e). The line from d7E to &’ is the vector distance F. with k and A both equal to unity. Whittaker (2) Here.Z7I. the general formulation consistent with obs&vations (a) to (d) is found to be: F = /&’ 3(&F)(Z’. To satisfy observation (f) terms other than those in I must cancel when & is equal to .+4&. A and B denote arbitrary then assumed linear force balance as represented by symmetry in & and &‘.B(&‘. Their experiment demonstrated that separated charges in a capacitor resulted in no tendency for the capacitor to turn when in linear motion transverse to its suspension. However. (d) The force between two elements of circuits is unaffected when all linear dimensions are increased proportionately..F)Z~ r3 r3 I. Put another way: (f) There is no interaction torque out of balance between anti-parallel current elements. Whittaker made no mention of the all-important experimental discovery of Trouton and Noble (3).r)(&‘.F) ( r5 - 2(&X’) p3 1 r * (1) Here. the current-strengths remaining unaltered. or attract when carrying current in the same direction. disregarding Ampere’s assumption. 180 Journal of The Franklin Institute . Prom the analysis by Whittaker (2).i)F r5 ( 2(Z. although its polarity may be determined by using the law to verify the observation : (e) Two extended parallel circuit elements in close proximity mutually repel one another when carrying current in opposite directions. and thus obtained his law: p = Eii.~)~-(d7. Ampere combined with the above the assumption that the force between two current elements acts along the line joining them.&‘.

February 1969 181 . where --F’ is the force we now assume to act directly on m’ as a result of its electrodynamic interaction with m. Then. two have arisen by action and reaction and one is really fictitious. 4. i. -m -m’c -i?f dt in V direction. dt dt b a37 at The total force on m’ now becomes . The prime direct electrodynamic force induces acceleration in a particle and therefore the inertial reaction. the velocity (4) of m. on m we add the force : -m’-.’ dt in V’ direction. This force is a fully balanced interaction force. On m’ we add the force: _m-%a Z = -_m’__. the velocity from a force Let V’. For generality. although we now have three force components. tend to change.Brief Communications Dynamic Analysis Consider now two particles of mass m and m’. No. of m’. tend to change. Let V. Consider the rate of energy change at m’. in F direction. The centre of inertia of this two-particle system is taken to be distant a and b respectively from m and m’. 287. They are separated by the distance vector 7. Therefore. the inertial reaction force component which could correspond to a turning action has been introduced in the inertial formulation but since it must be zero it has been offset by a balancing term. These two forces on m and m’ will. decreasing by %. Vol.e. in the general case. 2.iii’ b =-mdt a from Eq. produce a turning moment in the system. the forces in the system must prevent an out-of-balance couple from asserting itself. This must -m(%/dt) arise from a force -m(&‘/dt) acting on m’ in the direction V’. decreasing by I%‘. This must arise acting on m in the direction V. Since there is no evidence that any system can begin to turn merely by its own internal interactions. We then remove the kinetic energy term and equate the remainder to zero. In summary. m’b = ma.d.

it has been shown that a unique law of electrodynamics can be formulated as The odd thing about this is that the law thus deduced differs from that of AmpBre. Of interest then is the fact that this force is exactly that deduced theoretically by evaluating the interaction component of the integrated magnetic field energy clue to the two current elements and assuming that it tends to increase. However. and Grassmann. The comparison is satisfied if A is .1. Eqs.)v~(F. Biot and Savart. Further. 2 shows it to be of the general form developed empirically by Whittaker. For the particle of mass m’. (9) A comparison of Eq. (w.Brief Communications Thus. This result fully supports the belief that the isolated current element as a steady current element is contradictory. Eq.s)o~-(. 8 If we now assume the particles to be electrons. F.v )r units. (w. The inertial effects of the charge carriers are important to the understanding of the full law of electrodynamics. the masses m and m’ become equal and since the effective current elements e5.Z’) r2 and. d.21)21’ r -. We then develop the identity.1 and B is . Further. with & = &’ realize that k is + 1. this satisfies observation (f). eZ’ may be written iz. 9 with Eq. Whittaker.‘)?).v’) (7) We can now evaluate the resultant force acting on each particle.’ mdt= 0 -c- F’ (F. = kii’(& .i. from observation (e).. (6) Similarly for m. If the masses of charge carriers in different parts of the same circuit are different the middle term in the above formulation has a coefficient equal to the mass ratio. 6 and 7 may be used to derive the general force expression p= ~-(q. i%’ where e denotes the electron charge in electromagnetic becomes. as expected from the basis of the analysis. 182 Journal of The Franklin Institute . we have deduced that this law is only valid for interactions between charge elements of equal mass...

Brief Communications Since this middle term represents a force component along the direction of current flow.087. This is of the order of 100i2. Sot. Whittaker. Forces of the order of lOOi as found by Kobel are therefore readily explained. This also applies to the classical formulations of the electrodynamic law. 1903. Vol. Phys. Similarly. R. Many authors have found anomalous cathode reaction forces in discharge studies. (4) E. Phil. Some deeper understanding of the law will have practical consequences in discharge and plasma control. for example. (3) F. Nelson. It may be concluded that the resolution of this long-standing problem of the true nature of this basic electrodynamic law is not a mere academic topic. pp. Pergamon Press. Even using Eq. There is no force action along the filament. any element of current in a continuous filament is subjected to balancing forces from the filament current on either side. However. bearing in mind that in a discharge at least some of the current at the electrodes suddenly is transported by ions and not electrons. 36. Kobel. This force is the product of the constituent ion current component squared and the ratio of the ion mass to the electron mass. For example. T. Trans. 1. 1930. It works out that there is an out-of-balance force productive of a cathode reaction by impact from the ions. New York. (2) Sir E. 202A. Mere reaction momentum considerations lead to a relatively small cathode reaction force which is linearly dependent upon current.No. R. London. “The Mechanical Forces Acting on a Charged Condenser Moving Through Space”. 1636. On one side of this current junction at the cathode electrons act upon ions in the discharge and on the other side ions act on ions. 2. “Early Electrodynamics”. Vol. Oxford. 1965. Noble. we may predict that in a discharge circuit where electrons carry current in a cathode but positive ions contribute to the current to the cathode there will be an electrodynamic force manifested along the discharge. 10 assumes importance. A. “Aether and Electricity”. R. where i is the current in absolute units.February 1969 183 . the m’lm factor to be used with the middle term of Eq. some manifestation of the predicted anomalous forces should appear in plasma work.. p. Vol. Rev. Tricker. References (1) R. 1951. Kobel (4) found an anomalous cathode reaction force of 250 dyn at 16 A and 1400 dyn at 35 A. London. This quadrature current phenomenon has defied explanation. Trouton and H. 165-181.

- PHY-TEST-EM03(2-3)
- Motor Effect
- Materials Chemical Properties Part 1
- Investigation of the Effect on the Electrode Characteristics by a Metal Ring Encircling the Electrode
- Class10 Science Notes Chapter12
- Electricity
- Section 2 Electricity.unlocked
- Electric Current
- Ammar Entry Test Question
- Physical Sciences Paper 1 Memorandum
- Graneau Paper on Water Explosions
- notebook15
- Physics II Problems (41).pdf
- ASA.General_Capítulo.4.pdf
- Plasma Primer
- 43434853-spm-physics-definition-list-131206091813-phpapp02.pdf
- Electromagnetic Field Theory, Bo Thide
- Well Logging Electrical Methods
- advance welding technology
- Class7_NSO_Level2_2012
- Current Waveform
- Subsurface Investigation Using High Resolution Resistivity
- EMFT_Book
- Gujcet 2012 Syllabus English
- Selection of the Equipment
- Sample Test Paper BS
- 2012 Expedition SSV2
- 202_17545_Know More About the Transformers
- Battery ROM
- EMFT_Book

Skip carousel

- As 4827.1-2008 Coating Defect Surveys for Buried Pipelines Direct Current Voltage Gradient (DCVG)
- tmpF24A.tmp
- As 4352-2005 Tests for Coating Resistance to Cathodic Disbonding
- tmp87D5
- tmp736A.tmp
- tmpF4D3.tmp
- As 2832.4-2006 Cathodic Protection of Metals Internal Surfaces
- As 2832.2-2003 Cathodic Protection of Metals Compact Buried Structures
- As 2832.1-2004 Cathodic Protection of Metals Pipes and Cables
- tmp53D9
- tmpC555.tmp
- tmp631F.tmp
- As 2239-2003 Galvanic (Sacrificial) Anodes for Cathodic Protection
- As 4832-2007 Cathodic Protection - Installation of Galvanic Sacrificial Anodes in Soil
- Lillian McCullough Berghane v. Radio Corporation of America, 217 F.2d 490, 3rd Cir. (1954)
- As 2832.5-2008 Cathodic Protection of Metals Steel in Concrete Structures
- As 3685-1998 Recommended Procedures and Principles of Glow Discharge Mass Spectrometry (GD-MS)
- tmpFFDC.tmp
- tmpD7F4.tmp
- As 2832.3-2005 Cathodic Protection of Metals Fixed Immersed Structures
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co, 179 F.2d 293, 3rd Cir. (1950)

- Kinetic Decomposition of Ozone and Para-chlorobenzoic Acid (PCBA) During Catalytic Ozonation
- 124872669 Aspden Power From Water Cold Fusion Part 1 1994
- Schafer Redox State 1
- ja00880a025.pdf
- System Mapping Radical Oxidation Pathways
- 110182840 Aspden Synchronous Lattice Electrodynamics as an Alternative to Time Dilation 1987
- 110182901 Aspden the Theoretical Nature of the Neutron and the Deuteron 1986
- 110182934 Aspden the Theory of the Proton Constants 1988
- Science 2010 Larsen 65 9
- Schafer Redox State 2
- redox
- Fenton Chemistry
- JChemPhys_92_3980
- Qr 9672100079
- 81248763 Herbert v Guenther the Tantric View of Life
- Atos
- Aether - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Aetherometric Biology - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Nanometric Functions of Bioenergy - Front Matter
- Aetherometric Natural Philosophy - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Aetherometric Mathematics - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Steinmetz CPElectrical Discharges Waves and Impulses 2ndEd
- 82
- Andrew Harvey - RadiantHeart.nfo
- Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- c1cp21803d
- Electrochemical+Series
- Aetherometric Technologies - Encyclopedia Nomadica
- Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity - Encyclopedia Nomadic

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading