Thesis I

1
International Electronics and Technical Institute Inc. # 34 Lark Street, Sta. Elena, Marikina City
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction Nowadays, technology evolution takes over the world. Many Countries if not all are involved to technology innovation. There are countries that prefer to use technology for business purposes and there are those with personal agenda. Adaptation for innovation took a route, from simpler method of computing to a modernize process now. This research study of the Effectiveness of using Server Management System for IETI College of Science and Technology will create a new diversity. A Window-based product designed to make it easier for your organization to manage, support, and maintain a distributed network of computer resources. A system can generate network monitoring, security, and files safety and authentication. These characteristics may help the school either for educational purposes or school facilities improvement. This system may be set as the main server that can operate the functions mentioned which may lead to better organization. The characteristics and capabilities of computers are the highlights and trends of Server Management System. As years pass by, computers continue to become smaller, faster, more reliable, less costly to purchase and maintain, and more interconnected within the network.
This study describes how the primary features of Systems Management Server (SMS) work and how each of those features can benefit the organization. After
explaining each feature individually, this study would describe how features are integrated to perform common tasks in an organization. This system introduces several primary features of SMS, such as software and hardware inventory. It also includes features that help monitor the activity of SMS and maintain healthy sites, such as backup and recovery. The implementation of some features on the server is different from the client, specifically taking advantage of the architecture for IETI College of Science and Technology. This study describes those differences for each primary feature. The suite provides solutions to provision, control, automation, and monitor servers from a central console and it even provide authentication. Access is easily controlled, whereas stored data must be managed. Networkbased data services eliminate the need for additional shared infrastructure, have a minimal impact on company administrators and are usually self - service for the user or suddenly simplify the data management.
Background of the Study It is important to realize that major changes and trends in computer systems have occurred during the major stages or generation of computing, and will continue into the future. The first generation of computers developed in the early 1950s, the second generation blossomed during the late 1960s, the third generation work computing into the 1970s, and the fourth generation has been the computer technology of the 1980s and 1990s. A fifth generation of computing systems and devices that accelerates the trends of the previous generations is predictable to evolve in the early 21st century.
Although we are moving into the fifth generation of computing it is still a subject of debate since the concept of generation may no longer fit the continual, rapid, changes occurring in computer hardware, software, data, networking technologies. But in any case, we can be sure that progress in computing will continue to accelerate, and that the development of Internet-based technologies and applications will be one of the major forces driving computing in this century. Theoretical/Conceptual Framework Server Management System is often enhanced as more effective and more suitable system. A complete, high-level design methodology has been proposed for embedded information system based on managing the system. Thought the reliability of this system has improved to very acceptable levels over the years, contacts are one of the most frequent accident points of any electromechanical system due to malicious doing. The concept of the Server Management System that results to great changes in the field of managing is more modern. By implementing digitalization, students information will surely be secured, data processing will be faster, more reliable and efficient, paper works can be reduced; data updating and editing is simplified.
Administrators, employees and faculty of IETI College of Science and Technology Marikina City School Year: 2012 - 2013
Server Management System
Features Functions of SMS

Network Management File Management Protection
Stability Scalability Reliability Security
Fig. 1 Paradigm of the Study Statement of the Problem This study aimed to develop an up to date way of managing the system from server/s to client/s that has a secured database management system. System may have varied configurations and what users deploy depends on the performance characteristics
they need and the price they are willing to pay. There are a number of systems available that allow users to measures data to disk drives with varying price and performance characteristics. The system sought to answer the following questions: 1. What will be the functions of Server Management System in terms of the following: 1.1. Network Management 1.2. File Management 1.3. Protection 2. What are the features of Server Management System in terms of the following fields: 2.1. Stability 2.2. Scalability 2.3. Reliability 2.4. Security 3. Is there effectiveness in using Server Management System? Hypothesis There was no effectiveness of using Server Management System among the IETI Non-Teaching and Teaching personnel of IETI College of Science and Technology Marikina City.
Significance of the Study The following are the institutions and persons who will benefit from this case study: School. This may help the institution in the field of managing, as it will improve the data protection once implemented. Students. In this study students may get to know how important the Server Management System is against some threat. The result of this study helps the students to learn and know their limitation in using computers. Instructors. This study may help them to manage their student information and secure the school and the computer rooms from malicious threat. Researcher. This study provides advantage, security, threats, filtration and network monitoring that will be needed for the future studies. Scope and Delimitations The study considers the number of Non-Teaching and Teaching personnel of the IETI College of Science and Technology Marikina Campus for the School Year 2012 2013 which will serve as the respondents of the study. Out of thirty (30) Personnel, six (6) are Non-Teaching including five (5) student assistants and sixteen (16) are Teaching Personnel. The researcher deal with that however the 3 other personnel were been call off.
Definition of Terms The following operational terms were defined to suits the academic and school ground needs. Efficiency. Server must be fast enough for the needs of the organization, or terminal services or high-volume database servers frequently require very powerful server hardware, either software. Flexibility. The ability of the servers must be bendable enough to fit in whether processing the data besides fail over. Innovative. Refers to the new method used in managing the system for the concept of Server Management System. Protection and Security. It provide access list for protecting directories which contain information about those uses not allowed to access it. The interface is considered the boundary of trustworthiness, because no waterway programs are executed on machine. Reliability. The ability of the system which can serve as completely accessible in terms of managing. Scalability. Is the ability of the server to be reasonably accessed by a number of clients on a given time.
Server. Refers to the hardware and software with specific task or a workstation for authorized person/s. Stability. The ability to generate stable connection because downtime or network shortage is an organizational killer. Virtualization. Refer to a physical computer in the classical sense is clearly a complete and actual machine, both subjectively (from the user's point of view) and objectively (from the hardware system administrator's point of view).
Chapter II
REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

This chapter presents different articles, book, case studies and literatures which have significant relatedness to the study that helped the researcher gain reliable information about the current study. It also provides more insight to have better understanding and perspective to the objective of the study. Related Literature The literature is a valuable resources and a bank of knowledge which is important to the researcher to think about the prevailing topic. This is a review about the case study which is based on the journal, books, articles and newspapers that were structured for the use of Server Management System. Here are some foreign and local literatures related to the current study written by different authors. Foreign Literature Case (2011) Convert it into a server you will also must need to set-up the operating system so it does not shut down at inconvenient times, yet runs in a low-power state when not being actively used. Low-power consumption is strongly emphasized in this quoted literature, because it is related to the server management system, even it is in on state it will be convenient to use. Crump (2007), While server virtualization provides your customers with increased flexibility to respond to business needs; it also introduces some problems,
10
especially in the storage area. Those problems can reduce the scope of the project or delay future ones. By assisting customers to develop best practices for managing storage for virtual servers, you can help keep server virtualization projects from being slow in too quickly and keep future projects in the pipeline. Most businesses were using servers as solution for storage problem, according to George Crump. Server Management System can be more important because of its characteristics which could handle large amount of data if necessary. McClure (2010), Of course, there are environments where unified storage may not be a fit. While server virtualization environments are ideal for unified storage from a flexibility standpoint, capacity and performance requirements must be given careful consideration. Users often plan for capacity, but typically get quite far down the server virtualization road before they realize the aggregate performance requirements of all the virtual machines they plan to deploy outstrips the performance of the storage systems. Applications then start contending for storage processing cycles and everything slows. McClure declared that the quality of performance, flexibility, storage systems and processing of data where integrated as one which can be considered as one of the amazing environment found in this system yet it correlates to the current study. Pillar (2009), Managed Service Providers (MSPs) must invest in a Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solution in order to receive alerts to situations requiring immediate attention and also to provide maximum uptime to customers. In addition, today's RMM solutions allow many mundane, daily maintenance activities to be
11
scripted and delivered on a scheduled basis without human intervention. These activities include operating system and software application patch management, antivirus and anti spam updates, disk optimization and backup monitoring. RMM allows the MSP's staff to focus on high priority activities, provides the ability to support a larger quantity of customers and delays the need to hire more staff. Pillar noted that Managed Service Providers can be more effective and reliable, because it could lever and support larger quantity of costumer with the use of remote monitoring and management considered as one of the environment of the server which related to the study Martha Young (2011), Blade servers offer real, tangible benefits to customers needing to implement more than eight to ten servers. They provide improved data center utilization through a reduced footprint, deployment, management and maintenance convenience, and reduced total power consumption. Like all new technologies, blade server objections can be addressed through careful assessment of customer needs and vendor evaluations According to Martha Young, server may improve the managing system through a less deployment, less power consumption, more effective maintenance and handiness in the field of management which is related to the study. Fluckinger (2011), Developing plans for virtual server backup is another uncertainty, as the health IT world awaits the HIPAA omnibus rule, which outlines how federal regulators plan to enforce new health data privacy and security standards. That
12
rule has been sitting at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) since March, the typically quick review process having been given a few extensions. Fluckinger added that the server would serve as back-upping tool for file and information to facilitate security and privacy for unauthorized threats which is related to the study. Castagna, (2012) Server virtualization adds both simplicity and complexity to server infrastructures, but it unarguably creates a far more nimble and economical environment. It does that by essentially distancing itself from the hardware, which, for the most part, remains largely unchanged. So its an evolution that has occurred without any significant disturbances to the underlying server infrastructure. Rich Castagna assured that server would both simply and complex, more nimble and economical which means that server is more efficient to apply yet it does correlates to the current study. Local Literature Asaro, (2011) Overall, backup is still the de facto method of protecting data and will be for at least the next decade. Having said that, Tony, think that the beginning of the end is upon us. Backup processes are being replaced incrementally. Replication and recovery will be used more often as will be application-based data protection tools. These two points seem contradictory, but its often the way within IT that both the status quo and the next-generation approach coexist for long periods of time. Asaro thought that back-upping of files or data information is one of the factors of protecting the organization through threats which give assurance to the benefactor and it
13
was related to the study. Inquirer (2012), Server Virtualization technology involves the creation of software and hardware allowing the maximum use of the capacity of a single physical server, said Joel H. Garcia, Microsoft Philippines Server & Tools Business Group Lead. With this, customers could approach cloud (computing) opportunities, whether private or public, on their own terms supported by advanced capabilities giving them confidence to achieve their goals. Cloud computing involves the use of remote servers and hosted services over the Internet. Daily Inquirer, a business news paper, said that server virtualization technology same as Server Management System could give confidence to achieve goals and hosted services over the internet network or local network which is connected to the current study. Related Studies Nowadays, businesses, organizations even schools were adopting new advance techniques to monitor their business transactions. Here are some of the foreign and local studies which came from books. Articles and thesis that were related to the study. Foreign Studies Silberschatsz (2007), Ideally, a server should look to its clients like conventional, centralized file system. Accordingly, service activity has to be carried out across the network; instead of single centralized data repository, there are multiple independent storage devices. The multiplicity and dispersion of its servers and storage devices should make transparent.
14
Silberschatsz encoded that server could be centralized file system that can access through network and has multiple independent storage devices so that the system could interact with ease which is related to the study. Mogull (2010), Agent management consists of two main functions: deployment and maintenance. On the deployment side, most tools today are designed to work with whatever workstation management tools your organization already uses. As with other soft-ware tools, you create a deployment package and then distribute it along with any other software updates. Mogull said that workstation management tools could be more helpful in upgrading software for the system and organization of information is utilize which is related to the study. Siebert (2010), As a result, managing storage in a virtual environment is an ongoing challenge that usually requires the combined efforts of desktop, server, virtualization and storage administrators to ensure that virtualized servers and desktops perform well. Siebert point out that server virtualization is the combination of desktop hardware; an operating system and administrator to ensure that server will perform well and it linked to the study. McClure (2010), Storage-area network (SAN) or block-based storage is a mature technology. Advantages to this approach include: Optimization for high performance and reliability for data-intensive workloads, facilitates faster throughput and improved performance, a large pool of experienced administrators, a wide variety of available
15
physical management tools from virtualization vendors like VMware, as well as thirdparty suppliers, and storage administrators familiarity. McClure explained that storage-area network or block-based storage is more advance technology with the purpose of optimization for high performance system which correlates to the present study. Local Studies Santos (2012), Charles Ty said that only 30 percent of funds were for business innovation, which is important for the changing world that is moving towards a mainstream era. With the increasing global reach of the Internet, more and more data were being sent from one place in the world to another Ty said. The storage infrastructure from 20 years ago just wont cut it anymore, he said. HPs Convergence Infrastructure is a combination of servers, storage, networks, and management software that makes a complete package with significantly lower costs and fewer parts. Santos coined that server can be a complete package in dealing with advance technology and according to HP Storage Philippines Category manager Charles Ty it can purchase at lower cost which related to the study. Montecillo (2012) Manila, Philippines The government is setting up its own private cloud of servers that would host the entire bureaucracys email and other information communications technology (ICT) services. These are delivered with the use of servers and tech-storage facilities that may be located in different parts of the world.
16
Montecillo touted that private clouding of server could coupe the entire bureaucracy using information communication technology that handle the emails of the government and which related to the study. Villanueva, et al. (2010) Concluded that computerized system is better because it is efficient in particular with the validity and precision of the time that is logged into the system. It cannot be easily manipulated by the supervisors even the employee for it is a secured system that only administrator can access only, generate and print out the records. Villanueva concluded that a system which computerized was more efficient and better because administrator only can access the secured system and the administrator only can generate decision according to that matter, yet it correlated to the present study.
17
Chapter III
Research Design and Methodology

This chapter presents the methods of research which will be used as the basis to calculate the possibility of the study, the research and the statistical treatment. Method of Research The researcher will use normative descriptive method that deals with the purposive type of the research. This method is used to attain all the information needed in the statistics and to the goal of the study. The researcher will take up with this method to know the use Server Management System for IETI College of Science and Technology Admin and Faculty - Marikina Campus School Year: 2012 2013. Respondents of the Study The study focused on the effectiveness of using of Server Management System for the admin and faculty of IETI College of Science and Technology Marikina Campus School Year: 2012 2013.. The study sum up all the thirty (30) respondents, eleven (11) Non-Teaching and eleven (16) Teaching Personnel which have the total of twenty-seven (27) respondents, yet the three (3) other are call off. Locale of the Study In this study, the researcher will conduct the survey at the premises of IETI College of Science and Technology Marikina Campus located at #34 Lark Street Sta. Elena, Marikina City. The said institution offers computer based courses and has complete facilities to ensure the simplicity of the school system and because of this the researcher chose the said institution.
18
Research Checklist The researcher will be used questionnaire for every respondent as the right material for gathering data. The questionnaire will be prepared in order to know the use of Server Management System for the Admin and Faculty of IETI College of Science and Technology Marikina Campus School Year: 2012 2013 and is divided into two parts; the first part contains five (5) questions, the functions of the system and second part has ten (10) questions, which reflect to the knowledge of the respondents to the Server Management System. Data Gathering Procedures The researcher prepared a survey questionnaire based in the topic. A letter of request was prepared and forwarded to the directress office for approval so the researcher can conduct a survey. After the letter of request was approved, the respondents will answer and the gathered data will be retrieved. These were been tallied, calculated, analyzed and interpreted. Statistical Treatment Statistical treatment plays a vital role in research. The data which will be obtained from the instrument used in the survey will be treated independently. The following statically treatment will be used in interpreting the data or problem encountered. The researcher will use the formulas to work out on the data that will be gathered on the percentage of the categories needed for the study. All of these data are based on the answer form the questionnaire.
19
International Electronics and Technical Institute Inc. # 34 Lark Street, Sta. Elena, Marikina City 1.1. Percentage:
Formula:
P=
P percentage value of the respondents answer. F number of respondents answer for a specific question. N total number of respondents who answer the survey. 100 Constant factor. 1.2.
Mean
Formula:
= Mean = Sum of all Quantities N = Number of Respondents = Frequency
1.3.
Chi Square
Formula: = Chi square = Observe Frequency = Frequency
1.4.
Degree of Freedom
20
Formula:
(Column 1) (Row 1)
Chapter IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter represents the data which illustrate the assessment of the respondents to the questionnaire through tables. The information had been statistically calculated, analyzed and interpreted in order to study how correspondents evaluated the system. All the particular questions in Chapter 1 under the Statement of the Problem were answered in this chapter. Table 1
Percentage Distribution
The Respondents Respondents Teaching Personnel Non Teaching Personnel Total Frequency 16 11 27 Percentage 59.26% 40.74 % 100%
The table proved the frequency and the percentage of the respondents. The NonTeaching Personnel are eleven (11) although the Teaching Personnel are sixteen (16) with the total of twenty-seven (27) personnel. So the majority of the respondents are the Teaching Personnel.
Legend: 5 Strongly Agree 2 Disagree 4 Agree 1 Strongly Disagree 3 Fair
21
Table 1.1 Question #1: Are you aware in using Servers? Legend 5 4 3 2 1 Total Frequency 12 9 5 1 0 27 Percentage 44.44% 33.33% 18.52% 3.7% 0 100%
The table shows that the respondents were aware in server/s which corresponds that 44.44% were agreed with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.2 Question #2: Do you think network will be manageable? Legend 5 4 3 2 1 Total Frequency 12 12 2 1 0 27 Percentage 44.44% 44.44% 7.40% 3.7% 0 100%
The table shows that the respondents were responsive in using server for network management which corresponds that 44.44% were agreed with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5), same as Agree (4). Table 1.3
22
Question #3: Do you think file will be well organized?
Legend 5 4 3 2 1 Total
Frequency 13 10 4 0 0 27
Percentage 48.15% 37.07% 14.81% 0 0 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server/s for file managing which corresponds that 37.07% were agreed with the legend value of (4) Agree but not distant enough to Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.4 Question #4: Do you think school will be well monitored?
Frequency 9 12 5 1 0 27
Percentage 33.33% 44.44% 18.52% 3.7% 0 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server for monitoring the school premises which specify that 37.07% were agreed with the legend value of (4) Agree but not distant enough to Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.5
23
Question #5: Do you see the assurance in protections through threats?
Frequency 7 6 11 2 1 27
Percentage 25.93% 22.22% 40.74% 7.4% 3.7% 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server for protecting the system through threats which corresponds that 40.74% were neutral with the legend value of (3) Fair, but not distant enough to Strongly Agree (5) Table 1.6
Question #6: Do you see the importance of having Server Managing System in IETI?
Frequency 15 9 3 0 0 27
Percentage 55.56% 33.33% 11.11% 0 0 100%
The table shows that the respondents recognized the importance of using server which corresponds that 55.56% were decided with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5) Table 1.7
Question #7: Do you see Innovation in using this system like other IT schools?
24
Frequency 11 10 5 0 1 27
Percentage 40.74% 37.04% 18.52% 0 3.7% 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server for the assurance in information obtaining which corresponds that 40.74% were be in agreement with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.8 Question #8: Do you see the significance of using Server Management System for IETI?
Frequency 11 10 5 1 0 27
Percentage 40.74% 37.04% 18.52% 3.7% 0% 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server for storing the information and delivered it well, which corresponds that 40.74% were be in agreement with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.9
Question #9: Monitoring of students would be handy?
25
Frequency 12 11 4 0 0 27
Percentage 44.44% 40.74% 14.81% 0% 0% 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server for monitoring the students which corresponds that 44.44% were be in conformity with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.10 Question #10: Information can be obtained whenever they are needed
Frequency 10 9 7 0 1 27
Percentage 37.04% 33.33% 25.93% 0 3.7% 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server for prevention to unauthorized access which corresponds that 37.04% were be in compliance with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.11 Question #11: Amplification of information to be obtained easily?
26
Frequency 10 9 7 1 0 27
Percentage 37.04% 33.33% 25.93% 3.7% 0 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server for the amplification of information would be at ease which corresponds that 37.04% were be in agreement with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.12 Question #12: Can generate administration decision?
Frequency 9 10 5 3 0 27
Percentage 33.33% 37.04% 18.52% 11.11% 0 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server to generate decision within the administration which corresponds that 37.04% were decided with the legend value of Agree (4), which is not distant enough to Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.13 Question #13: Information can be stored and delivered well.
27
Frequency 9 10 6 1 1 27
Percentage 33.33% 37.04% 22.22% 3.7% 3.7% 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server as a solution for security and safeness of the school premises which corresponds that 37.04% were be in agreement with the legend value of Agree (4), which is not distant enough to Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.14
Question #14: Can provide prevention to unauthorized access?
Frequency 14 7 6 0 0 27
Percentage 51.85% 25.93% 22.22% 0 0 100%
The table shows that the respondents were conscious in using server as the key for innovation which corresponds that 51.85% were be in agreement with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5). Table 1.15
28
Question #15: Safeness in using server at the Campus/School premises?
Frequency 13 9 5 0 0 27
Percentage 48.15% 33.33% 18.52% 0 0 100%
The table shows that the respondents were supportive in using server for system management which corresponds that 48.15% were be in agreement with the legend value of Strongly Agree (5). Table 2
Mean Distribution
In this part, the table gives you an idea about the calculated value of the mean which serve as support data for this study.
Legend:
Strongly Agree = 4.5 5 Disagree = 1.5 2.49
Agree = 3.5 4.49 Strongly Disagree = 0 1.49
Fair = 2.5 3.49
Items
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Mean
4.19 4.30 4.70 4.52 3.59 4.44 4.11 4.15
Interpretation
Agree Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree
29
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Total Mean 4.30 4.37 4.03 4.00 3.93 4.30 4.30 4.22
Strongly Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree
The table proved that out of 15 items 3 were answered and interpreted with Strongly Agree and the rest item were agreed. Table 2.1
Non Teaching Personnel

Part 1
Item 1 2 3 4 5 Mean 4.64 4.64 3.8 4.09 3.27 Interpretation Strongly Agree Strongly Agree Agree Agree Fair 4.09 Agree Overall Mean Interpretation
The table represents that the Non Teaching personnel complied with agreement to the part one of the questionnaire which provides a result of 4.09 overall mean with the legend value of Agree (4). Table 2.2
Non - Teaching Personnel

Part 2
Question 6 7 Mean 4.36 4.27 Interpretation Agree Agree Overall Mean 4.23 Interpretation Agree
30
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 4.36 4.36 4.09 4.18 4.18 4.00 4.27 4.27 Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree
The table represents that the Non Teaching personnel complied with agreement to the part two of the questionnaire which provides a result of 4.23 overall mean with the legend value of Agree (4). Table 2.3
Teaching Personnel
Part 1
Question 1 2 3 4 5 Mean 3.94 4.38 4.25 4.00 3.69 Interpretation Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Overall Mean Interpretation
4.05
Agree
The table represents that the Teaching personnel complied with agreement to the part one of the questionnaire which provides a result of 4.05 overall mean with the legend value of Agree (4). Table 2.4
Teaching Personnel
Part 2
31
Question 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Mean 4.38 4.06 3.94 4.19 3.88 4.13 3.94 3.88 4.25 4.38 Interpretation Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Overall Mean Interpretation
4.10
Agree
The table represents that the Teaching personnel complied with agreement to the part two of the questionnaire which provides a result of 4.10 overall mean with the legend value of Agree (4). Table 3
Chi Square Distribution

(5) Strongly Agree 12 12 13 9 7 15 11 11 12
8.33 8.33 7.26 12 14.81 5.33 9.48 9.48 8.33
Items 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
(4) Agree 9 12 10 12 6 9 10 10 11
12 8.33 10.70 8.33 16.33 12 10.70 10.70 9.48
(3) Fair 5 2 4 5 11 3 5 5 4
17.93 23.15 19.59 17.93 9.48 21.33 17.93 17.93 19.59
(2) Disagree 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0
25.04 25.04 27 25.04 23.15 27 27 25.04 27
(1) Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

27 27 27 27 25.04 27 25.04 27 27
32
10 11 12 13 14 15 10 10 9 9 14 13
10.70 10.70 12 12 6.26 7.26
9 9 10 10 7 9
12 12 10.70 10.70 14.81 12
7 7 5 6 6 5
14.81 14.81 17.93 16.33 16.33 17.93
0 1 3 1 0 0
27 25.04 21.33 25.04 27 27
1 0 0 1 0 0
25.04 27 27 25.04 27 27
The table above illustrates the value of each item with their corresponding chi square equivalent. Degree of Freedom DF = (5 1) (15 1) DF = (4) (14) DF = 56 Table 4 This table shows the difference between the Computed Value and the Critical Value including the interpretation. Respondents Computed Value Critical Value Verbal Interpretation
27
1327.76
74.47
Significant
Based on the table above, the Computed Value is greater than the Critical Value. Therefore the null hypothesis is rejected and there is an effectiveness of using Server Management System.
33
Chapter V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

This chapter contains the summary of the researcher, conclusion to the problem and recommendations based on the understanding and interpretation of data presented in chapter IV. Summary of Findings After the current study has been finished, the following conclusion was drawn. 1. Among the Non Teaching and Teaching personnel IETI College of Science and Technology, Marikina City were have the same opinion about the Server Management System. They confirm that using server would be more supportive system for the school and the system is more accepted to them. 1.1. The respondents are more aware of using for server for managing the network; local network or global network, internet. 1.2. Most of the respondents rely on using server for file management. 1.3.According to the study, most of the respondents are willing to use server for protection of their entities and information. 2. Each items were been answered as expected and percentage accordingly, the outcome was strongly willed with the verbal interpretation that does not below to (3) fair yet it is confirmed that the system is more accommodating for managing the business. 2.1. Most of the respondents are expectedly knowledgeable about the system and they know how the system works.
34
2.2. The researcher found out that using server as support for managing the system would be more effective because it extent its ability to perform. 2.3. Using Server Management System as a tool for managing the system would be more reliable because of its capabilities. 2.4. The researcher sum up all the findings, security would be an assurance when an organization use server for managing the system and safeness would be upgraded. 3. The effectiveness of using Server Management System was proved by tables shown on chapter IV. Each table represents the value of the gathered data by means of the instruments and check list yet it results of agreement in conclusion. 4. The computed value 1327.76 is greater than the critical value 74.47 so that this study is significant which were needed as an expected. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected and there is an effectiveness of using Server Management System as supportive system for the IETI College of Science and Technology Marikina Campus. Conclusion 1. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of using server management system among the Non-Teaching and Teaching personnel of IETI College of Science and Technology, Marikina City. The researcher found out that using server may assist the organization to be more productive and innovative. After the researcher gathered all the information from the instrument that was used, using server as support system which could handle specific task for business is the benefactor of development process and provide a very satisfactory outcome especially in the field of managing the system.
35
2. The researcher also assured that using server as part of the business it would be more effective; it is because the characteristics of the system found on the questionnaire has been decided by the respondents with corresponding assessment of very satisfactory. 3. Therefore, the study results that there is an effectiveness of using Server Management System for IETI College of Science and Technology, Marikina City along with the Non Teaching and Teaching personnel. Recommendation Based on the conclusions that are made, the researcher presents the following set of recommendations. 1. The researcher strongly recommends that Server Management System is more consistent for being supportive system for business because of its attributes like; network managing, security, privacy of information, and monitoring the student of IETI College of Science and Technology, Marikina City, which could lead to a progressive organization. 2. Also the system will benefit the benefactor because it cost cheaper as expected and the system could be a workstation or a single unit that would handle specific task for development of the organization. 3. Using server would give more innovation to an organization because it provide simplicity of filing method, decrease the threats, serve fast network connection, organize task distribution, and declare safeness of the premises.
36
APPENDICES
37
APPENDIX A
(Letter of Request)
38
39
APPENDIX B
(Sample Questionnaire)
40
International Electronics and Technical Institute Inc. # 34 Lark Street, Sta. Elena, Marikina City The Use of Server Management System for the Non-Teaching and Teaching Personnel of IETI College of Science and Technology S.Y. 2013
I. The uses of Server Management System Put on the blank which corresponds to your answer Use the legend that follows: 5 Strongly Agree 4 Agree A. B. C. D. E. II. 3 Fair 2 Disagree 1 Strongly Disagree
Are you aware in using Servers? Do you think network will be manageable? Do you think file will be well organized? Do you think school will be well monitored? Do you see the assurance in protections through threats?
______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
Knowledge of the respondents on Server Management System. Put a check in the box that corresponds to your answer. Use the legend that follows: 5 Strongly Agree 3 Fair 2 Disagree 1 Strongly Disagree
4 Agree A. Reliability of the SMS
a. Do you see the importance of having Server Managing System for IETI? b. Do you see Innovation in using this system like other IT schools? c. Do you see the significance of using Server Management System for IETI? d. Monitoring of students would be handy?
41
B. Scalability and Stability of the SMS a. Information can be obtained whenever they are needed b. Amplification of information to be obtained easily? c. Can generate administration decision? d. Information can be stored and delivered well.
C. Security of the SMS a. Can provide prevention to unauthorized access? b. Safeness in using server at the Campus/School premises
D. Comments and Suggestions

______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
42
APPENDIX C
(References and Other Computation)
43
References Books
Silberschatsz, Abraham, (2007) Operating System Principle 7th edition, Page 560-561
News Papers, Magazine, Article and Case Study
Young, Martha, Magazine Top blade server considerations Page 4, Countering the top five blade server objections
Castagna, Rich, Storage: Relief for Virtual Backup Page 5, Get ready for the storage revolution Sept 2012
DELL, SearchServerVirtualization.com E-Guide Page 3, Evaluating Virtualization System Management Tools.
Fluckinger, Don, Article: Cancer research firm upgrades Page 2 of 5, Virtual Server Backup System
Asaro, Tony, Storage: Relief for Virtual Backup page 10, Is traditional backup past its prime? July 2011
Mogull, Rich, Information Security Article. Where data Lives: user interact with data on mobile devices and portable storage; data loss prevention products must move there as well. Page 23-24 Feb. 2010
44
Siebert, Eric, Storage 10 tips for managing storage for virtual servers and virtual desktop. page 13-14 Oct. 2010
Crump, George, (2007) Best Practices for Managing Storage Efficiency, Managing storage for virtual servers: Customer best practices, Page 7
McClure, Terri, (2010) Best Practices for Managing Storage Efficiency, Unified storage benefits, implementation and challenges, Page 4
Pillar Managed, (2009) Services: What are the core deliverables of a basic managed services offering? Page 2 By Case, Loyd, Pc World Heres how 11 uses for an old PC., Page, 94-95-96 Santos, Matikas, Inquirer Philippines:Converged infrastructure Servers that Lower Operations, Maintenance Costs, June 17, 2012 Technology Page.
Inquirer Philippines: Microsoft introduces new server Tuesday, May 29th, 2012, Technology Page Montecillo, Paolo G. Philippine Daily Inquirer:Govt to set up private cloud of servers to host e-mail, ICT services Technology Page, May 1st, 2012
McClure, Terri, Storage: Block vs. file storage to support virtual server environments
Page 37 Oct. 2010
45
Unpublished Books,
Mark Bowker, Analyst, Enterprise Strategy Group Podcast: Virtual Server Backup Page 2,Sponsored by CommVault Systems Inc.
Villanueva, (2010)
46
Computation
Percentage Distribution
Legend: (5)Strongly Agree (2)Disagree (4)Agree (3)Fair (1)Strongly Disagree
Table 1 Non Teaching Personnel P = x 100 P = 0.4074 x 100 P = 40.74% Teaching Personnel P = x 100 P = 0.5925 x 100 P = 59.25% Table 1.1 Question #1: Are you aware in using Servers? 5 P = x 100 P = 0.4444 x 100 P = 44.44% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.3333 x 100 P = 33.33% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.1852 x 100 P = 18.52% 2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7% 1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
Table 1.2 Question #2: Do you think network will be manageable? 5 P = x 100 P = 0.4444 x 100 P = 44.44% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.4444 x 100 P = 44.44% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.074 x 100 P = 7.4% Table 1.3 Question#3: Do you think file will be well organized? 5 P= x 100 P= 4 x 100 P= 3 x 100 P= 2 x 100 P= 1 x 100 2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7% 1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
47
P = 0.4814 x 100 P = 48.14% P = 0.3704 x 100 P = 37.04% P = 0.1481 x 100 P = 14.81% P = 0 x 100 P=0 P = 0 x 100 P=0
Table 1.4 Question #4: Do you think school will be well monitored? 5 P = x 100 P = 0.3333 x 100 P = 33.33% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.4444 x 100 P = 44.44% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.1852 x 100 P = 18.52% Table 1.5 Question #5: Do you see the assurance in protections through threats? 5 P = x 100 P = 0.2593 x 100 P = 25.93% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.2222 x 100 P = 22.22% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.4074 x 100 P = 40.74% Table 1.6
2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%
1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
2 P = x 100 P = 0.074 x 100 P = 7.4%
1 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%
5 P = x 100 P = 0.5555 x 100 P = 55.55%
4 P = x 100 P = 0.3333 x 100 P = 33.33%
3 P = x 100 P = 0.1111 x 100 P = 11.11% Table 1.7
2 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
5 P= x 100 P=
4 x 100 P=
3 x 100 P=
2 x 100 P=
1 x 100
48
P = 0.4074 x 100 P = 40.74% P = 0.3704 x 100 P = 37.04% P = 0.1852 x 100 P = 18.52% P = 0 x 100 P=0 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%
Table 1.8 Question #8: Do you see the significance of using Server Management System for IETI? 5 P = x 100 P = 0.4074 x 100 P = 40.74% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.3704 x 100 P = 37.04% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.1852 x 100 P = 18.52% Table 1.9
Question #9: Monitoring of students would be handy?
2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%
1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
5 P = x 100 P = 0.4444 x 100 P = 44.44%
4 P = x 100 P = 0.4074 x 100 P = 40.74%
3 P = x 100 P = 0.1481 x 100 P = 14.81% Table 1.10
2 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
Question #10: Information can be obtained whenever they are needed 5 P = x 100 P = 0.3704 x 100 P = 37.04% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.3333 x 100 P = 33.33% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.2593 x 100 P = 25.93% 2 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0 1 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%
Table 1.11 Question #11: Amplification of information to be obtained easily?
49
5 P = x 100 P = 0.3704 x 100 P = 37.04% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.3333 x 100 P = 33.33% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.2593 x 100 P = 25.93% Table 1.12 Question #12: Can generate administration decision? 5 P = x 100 P = 0.3333 x 100 P = 33.33% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.3704 x 100 P = 37.04% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.1852 x 100 P = 18.52% Table 1.13 Question #13: Information can be stored and delivered well. 5 P = x 100 P = 0.3704 x 100 P = 37.04% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.3333 x 100 P = 33.33% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.2222 x 100 P = 22.22% Table 1.14
2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%
1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
2 P = x 100 P = 0.1111 x 100 P = 11.11%
1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%
1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
5 P = x 100 P = 0.5185 x 100 P = 51.85%
4 P = x 100 P = 0.2593 x 100 P = 25.93%
3 P = x 100 P = 0.2222 x 100 P = 22.22% Table 1.15
2 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
50
5 P = x 100 P = 0.4815 x 100 P = 48.15% 4 P = x 100 P = 0.3333 x 100 P = 33.33% 3 P = x 100 P = 0.1852 x 100 P = 18.52% 2 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0 1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0
Mean Distribution
Table 2 Question #1: Are you aware in using Servers? = = 4.19
Question #2: Do you think network will be manageable? = = 4.30
Question#3: Do you think file will be well organized? = = 4.70
Question #4: Do you think school will be well monitored? = = 4.52
Question #5: Do you see the assurance in protections through threats? = = 3.59
= 4.44
= 4.11
Question #8: Do you see the significance of using Server Management System for IETI? = = 4.15
Question #9: Monitoring of students would be handy? = = 4.30
51
Question #10: Information can be obtained whenever they are needed = = 4.37
Question #11: Amplification of information to be obtained easily? = = 4.03
Question #12: Can generate administration decision? = = 4.00
Question #13: Information can be stored and delivered well. = = 3.93
= 4.30
= 4.30 Table 2.1 Non Teaching Personnel Part 1
Question #1: Are you aware in using Servers? = = 4.64
Question #2: Do you think network will be manageable? = = 4.36
Question#3: Do you think file will be well organized? = = 4.18
Question #5: Do you see the assurance in protections through threats?
52
= = 4.27
Table 2.2 Non - Teaching Part 2 Question #6: Do you see the importance of having Server Managing System in IETI?
= = 4.36
= = 4.27

= = 4.27

= = 4.27
53
Table 2.3 Teaching Personnel Part 1 Question #1: Are you aware in using Servers? = = 3.94
Question #2: Do you think network will be manageable? = = 4.38 Question#3: Do you think file will be well organized? = = 4.25
Question #5: Do you see the assurance in protections through threats? = = 3.69
Table 2.4 Non- Teaching Personnel Part 2 Question #6: Do you see the importance of having Server Managing System in IETI?
= = 4.38
= = 4.06
54

= = 4.25

= = 4.38
Table 3 Chi Square Distribution (5) Item Strongly Agree (4) Agree (3) Fair (2) Disagree (1) Strongly Disagree
= 8.33
= 12
= 17.93
= 25.04
= 27
= 8.33
= 8.33
= 23.15
= 25.04
= 27
= 7.26
= 10.70
= 19.59
= 27
= 27
= 12
= 8.33
= 17.93
= 25.04
= 25.04
55
= 14.81
= 16.33
= 9.48
= 23.15
= 25.04
= 5.33
= 12
= 21.33
= 27
= 27
= 9.48
= 10.70
= 17.93
= 27
= 25.04
= 9.48
= 10.70
= 17.93
= 25.04
= 27
= 8.33
= 9.48
= 19.59
= 27
= 27
10
= 10.70
= 12
= 14.21
= 27
= 25.04
11
= 10.70
= 12
= 14.81
= 25.04
= 27
12
= 12
= 10.70
= 17.93
= 21.33
= 27
13
= 12
= 10.70
= 16.33
= 25.04
= 25.04
14
= 6.26
= 14.81
= 16.33
= 27
= 27
15
= 7.26
= 12
= 17.93
= 27
= 27

Thesis I

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Thesis I

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

1

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Server Management System

Features Functions of SMS

REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Research Design and Methodology

= Mean = Sum of all Quantities N = Number of Respondents = Frequency

Formula: = Chi square = Observe Frequency = Frequency

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Legend: 5 Strongly Agree 2 Disagree 4 Agree 1 Strongly Disagree 3 Fair

Percentage 48.15% 37.07% 14.81% 0 0 100%

Percentage 33.33% 44.44% 18.52% 3.7% 0 100%

Percentage 25.93% 22.22% 40.74% 7.4% 3.7% 100%

Percentage 55.56% 33.33% 11.11% 0 0 100%

Percentage 40.74% 37.04% 18.52% 0 3.7% 100%

Percentage 40.74% 37.04% 18.52% 3.7% 0% 100%

Percentage 44.44% 40.74% 14.81% 0% 0% 100%

Percentage 37.04% 33.33% 25.93% 0 3.7% 100%

Percentage 37.04% 33.33% 25.93% 3.7% 0 100%

Percentage 33.33% 37.04% 18.52% 11.11% 0 100%

Percentage 33.33% 37.04% 22.22% 3.7% 3.7% 100%

Percentage 51.85% 25.93% 22.22% 0 0 100%

Percentage 48.15% 33.33% 18.52% 0 0 100%

Strongly Agree = 4.5 5 Disagree = 1.5 2.49

Agree = 3.5 4.49 Strongly Disagree = 0 1.49

Fair = 2.5 3.49

Non Teaching Personnel

Non - Teaching Personnel

Chi Square Distribution

(1) Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

12 12 10.70 10.70 14.81 12

14.81 14.81 17.93 16.33 16.33 17.93

27 25.04 21.33 25.04 27 27

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________

4 Agree A. Reliability of the SMS

D. Comments and Suggestions

News Papers, Magazine, Article and Case Study

DELL, SearchServerVirtualization.com E-Guide Page 3, Evaluating Virtualization System Management Tools.

Page 37 Oct. 2010

2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%

1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0

2 P = x 100 P = 0.074 x 100 P = 7.4%

1 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%

5 P = x 100 P = 0.5555 x 100 P = 55.55%

4 P = x 100 P = 0.3333 x 100 P = 33.33%

3 P = x 100 P = 0.1111 x 100 P = 11.11% Table 1.7

2 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0

1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0

2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%

1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0

5 P = x 100 P = 0.4444 x 100 P = 44.44%

4 P = x 100 P = 0.4074 x 100 P = 40.74%

3 P = x 100 P = 0.1481 x 100 P = 14.81% Table 1.10

2 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0

1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0

Table 1.11 Question #11: Amplification of information to be obtained easily?

2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%

1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0

2 P = x 100 P = 0.1111 x 100 P = 11.11%

1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0

2 P = x 100 P = 0.0370 x 100 P = 3.7%

1 P = x 100 P = 0 x 100 P=0

5 P = x 100 P = 0.5185 x 100 P = 51.85%

__