Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
=
= V +
c
c
o
o
Where: (oq) is the volume fraction for the q
th
phase.
- Momentum for q
th
phase:
(2) ) F F F (
) u m ( g
p ) u u (
t
) u (
q , vm q , lift q q q
q
n
1 p
pq pq q q q
q q q q q
q q q
+ +
+ + 9 + V + +
V = V +
c
c
=
o
t o
o o
o
Where the first left hand side term is referring to the
transient and the second one is refer to the convection.
In the right hand side, the terms are referring to the
pressure, body force, shear stress, (interphase forces
exchange and interphase mass exchange) and (external,
lift, and virtual mass forces) respectively. Hence, solids
pressure term is included for granular model. The inter-
phase exchange forces are expressed as:
) u u ( K
q p pq pq
= 9
Where Kpq is the exchange coefficient and in general
Fpq= - Fqp.
- Energy equation for q
th
phase can be similarly
formulated.
Multiphase species transport for species i belonging
to mixture of q
th
phase
(3) ) m m (
S R J
) Y u ( ) Y (
t
i j j i
q p
n
1 p
q p
q
i
q q
i
q q
i
q
q
i
q q q q
i
q q
+ + + V
= V +
c
c
=
o o o
o o
Where the first left hand side term is referring to the
transient and the second one is refer to the convection.
In the right hand side, the terms are referring to the
diffusion, homogeneous reaction, homogeneous
production and heterogeneous reaction respectively.
Each of the computational iteration is solved implicitly.
The convergence of the computational solution is
determined on scaled residuals for the continuity,
momentum and energy equations for many of predicted
and standard variables. The settings for the scaled
residuals for solution convergence are set to 10
-3
for all
computed residuals approximately. The solution is
considered to be converged when all of the scaled
residuals are less than or equal to these default settings.
4.0 Results and Discussion
4-1 Experimental Part:
4-1-1 Steady State:
Figure (2) shows the effects of particle size on
temperature gradient distribution curve along the column
for different fluidized bed velocities at the heat flux values
at the steady state condition. For a certain value of
fluidized bed velocity and heat flux, the temperature
gradients increase as the mean solid particle diameter
decreases. This is due to that the finer particle can cause
higher heat transfer coefficient because the small particle
have small thermal conductive resistance and the smaller
particles can increase the effective heat transfer area
covered by particle.
Figure (3) describes the effects of heat flux on
temperature gradient distribution curve along the column
for different particle size at different fluidized bed
velocities for the steady state condition. For a certain
value of fluidized bed velocity, the temperature gradients
increase as the heat flux increases this is due to increase
of amount of heat to the fluidized bed flow.
Figure (4) illustrates the effects of the fluidized bed
velocity on temperature gradient distribution curve along
the column for different particle size at the heat flux
values at the steady state condition. Also, for certain
value of heat flux, the temperature gradients increase as
the fluidized bed velocity increases this is due to increase
the amount of air which have amount of heat therefore
increase the heat transfer to the solid particle and
increase the temperature profile.
4-1-2 Unsteady State:
Figure (5) shows the effect of particle size on unsteady
state temperature profile along the column for fluidized
velocities at different values of time, namely changing
between (0 min) to (4.85 min) along the vertical pipe
distance (m). It can be observed that the temperature
profile increase when decreased the particle size. Also
because the small particle can cause higher heat transfer
coefficient due to that the smaller particles can increase
the effective heat transfer area covered by particle itself.
Figure (6) describes the effects of the heat flux and
different fluidized bed velocities on temperature profile for
different particle size at the same values of time of figure
(5). It can be observed that the temperature profile along
the fluidization column increases with increasing the heat
flux and as the velocities of fluidized bed increases, the
temperature profile increases. Because when the velocity
of fluidized bed increases, the solid particles will be more
action and as a result, the temperature distribution
increases.
4-2 Numerical Part:
The sand properties were (density=1400 kg/m
3
,
specific heat=800 J/kg.K, thermal conductivity=0.2
W/m.K), granular diameter=450 m and pacing limit=0.5.
The air velocity was 2 m/s with pressure-velocity coupling
(phase coupled SIMPLE) solution method. Figure (7)
ICEIT-2012 - 107 -
depicts the volume fraction of the flow (air-sand) behavior
at different time steps for pressure based Eulerian
laminar flow transient conditions. Figure (7-A) shows the
sand volume fraction at time 0.0 s with the whole pipe
height. It is clear in the figure the 10 cm granular height.
Figure (7-B) presents a zoomed picture to the column at
time=0.03 min. (1.8 sec.). to clarify the two phase flow
behavior. The zoomed picture is enlarged near the
bottom because the upper zone is containing air only.
Figures (7-C to 7-G) show zoomed pictures to the
column at time steps (0.57, 1.1, 1.65, 2.18 and 3.78 min.)
respectively. A turbulent fluidization regime with small
bubbles can be noticed. When time increases, the two
phase zone increases till reached a certain distanced as
described in figure (7-H) for the whole pipe height at
time=4.85 min. then the distanced remains constant. This
mixed zone (air+sand) height is approximately equal to
(0.5-0.6 m) and this is why the temperatures distributions
fall clearly near this distance. Because there is no sand
to carry the heat with it and no particles transfer the heat
to the pipe by conduction, there is only the convection by
air.
5. Conclusion
In this work it have been studied the effect of the
steady and unsteady state conditions for different particle
size, fluidized bed velocity and heat flux on the thermal
behavior of two phase flow (gas-solid). From this study, it
can be concluded that, the decreases of the particle size
will increase the temperature profile for different fluidized
bed velocities and heat flux values. The temperature
profile increases as fluidized bed velocity increases for
different particle size and heat flux values. And the
temperature profile increases as the heat flux increases
for different particle sizes and fluidized bed velocities.
References
[1] P. Mahanta, R.S. Patil, and M. Pandey, "Effect of
Particle Size and Sand Inventory on Wall-to-Bed Heat
transfer Characteristics of Circulating Fluidized Bed
Riser", Proceedings of the World Congress on
Engineering, ISSN: 2078-0966, Vol. II, London, U.K.
2010.
[2] S. Benyahia, H. Arastoonpour, T. M. Knowlton and H.
Massah, "Simulation of Particles and Gas Flow Behavior
in the Riser Section of a Circulating Fluidized Bed using
the Kinetic Theory Approach for the Particulate Phase",
Powder Technology / Elsevier, Volume 112, Issues 12,
Pages 2433, 5 October 2000.
[3] Sunun Limtrakul, Ativuth Chalermwattanati, Kosol
Unggurawirote, Yutaka Tsuji, Toshihiro Kawaaguchi and
Wiwut Tanthapanichakoon, "Discrete Particle Simulation
of Solid Motion in Gas-Solid Fluidized Bed", Chemical
Engineering Science,58, pp.915-921, 2003.
[4] N. S. Winaya, P. Basu and B.V. Reddy, "Experimental
Investigations On Heat Transfer From Suspension to
Impact Separators in the Riser Column of a Circulating
uidized Bed Combustor", International Journal of Heat
and Mass Transfer 46 pp. 7175, ,2003.
[5] D. Karageorgieva and R. Stanev, "Heat Transfer In
Low Temperature Circulating Fluidized Bed", Journal of
the University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy,
41, 1, 69-74, 2006.
[6] Maan S. Al- Dabbagh, "Experimental Study of Heat
Transfer Between the Shallow Fluidized Bed and a Tube
Bundle Immersed in it", Al-Rafidain Engineering, Vol.14,
No.4, pp.24-33, 2006.
[7] Chang Ahn, Jin-Bok Yoo, Yoo-Taek Kim and Sung-
Chul Yi, "Computational Modeling of the Sintering
Process of Ceramic Particles in a Fluidized Bed
Furnace", Journal 0f Ceramic Processing Research, Vol.
9, No. 6, pp.569-575, 2008.
[8] Mladen M. Stojiljkovic, Branislav V. Tojanovic, Jelena
N. Janevski, and Gradimir S., "Mathematical Model of
Unsteady Gas to Solid Particles Heat Transfer in
Fluidized Bed", Thermal Science: Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 55-
68, 2009.
[9] Z. O. Opafunso, I. I. Ozigis and I. A. Adetunde,
"Pneumatic and Hydraulic Systems in Coal Fluidized Bed
Combustor", American J. of Engineering and Applied
Sciences 2 (1): 88-95, 2009.
[10] U. S. Wankhede, "Heat Transfer Characteristics and
Particle Behavior around a Horizontal Heating Surface
Immersed in a Sound Assisted Fluidized Bed of Fine
Powders", International Journal of Dynamics of Fluids,
ISSN: 0973-1784, Volume 5, Number 2, pp. 139144,
2009.
[11] Tahseen Al-Hattb and Riyadh S. Al-Turhee, "Effect
of Particle Size on Heat Transfer Coefficient in Fluidized
Bed Column" Special issue for the papers presented in
1St Annual Scientific Conference of the College of
Engineering 17-18 May 2009 Part (B).
[12] Riyadh S. Al-Turhee, "Transient Thermal Behavior of
Fluidized Bed Column" Iraqi Journal for Mechanical and
Materials Engineering, 2011.
[13] Andr Bakker, "Applied Computational Fluid
Dynamics", Lecture 14-Multiphase Flows, Fluent Inc.
(2002).
[14] Fluent User Services Center, "Modeling Multiphase
Flows", Introductory FLUENT Notes, December 2006.
ICEIT-2012 - 108 -
Figure (1) schematic diagram and photograph of the experimental apparatus.
ICEIT-2012 - 109 -
Figure (2) effects of particle size on temperature distribution along the column for different fluidized bed velocities.
ICEIT-2012 - 110 -
Figure (3) effects of heat flux on temperature distribution along the column (pipe) for different particle size.
ICEIT-2012 - 111 -
Figure (4) effects of the fluidized bed velocity on temperature distribution along the column for different particle size.
ICEIT-2012 - 112 -
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Distance (m)
70
80
90
100
110
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Q=100 W U=1.4 m/s
Particle Size=550 mic m
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Distance (m)
70
80
90
100
110
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Q=100 W U=1.8 m/s
Particle Size=550 mic m
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Distance (m)
70
80
90
100
110
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Q=100 W U=1.4 m/s
Particle Size=300 mic m
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Distance (m)
70
80
90
100
110
120
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Q=100 W U=1.8 m/s
Particle Size=300 mic m
Figure (5) effect of particle size on temperature profile along the pipe for fluidized velocities at different values of time.
ICEIT-2012 - 113 -
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Distance (m)
70
80
90
100
110
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Q=180 W U=2.1m/s
Particle Size=800 mic m
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Distance (m)
70
80
90
100
110
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Q=140 W U=2.1m/s
Particle Size=800 mic m
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Distance (m)
70
80
90
100
110
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Q=100 W U=2.1m/s
Particle Size=800 mic m
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Distance (m)
70
80
90
100
110
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Q=180 W U=1.4 m/s
Particle Size=550 mic m
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Distance (m)
70
80
90
100
110
120
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Q=180 W U=1.8 m/s
Particle Size=550 mic m
Figure (6) effects of the heat flux and fluidized bed velocities on temperature profile for different particle size at different
values of time.
ICEIT-2012 - 114 -
(B)
(A)
(C) (D)
ICEIT-2012 - 115 -
Figure (7) volume fraction of the flow (air-sand) behavior at different time steps.
(E) (F)
(G)
(H)