61 views

Uploaded by Anonymous UCveMQ

for reference

- Dry Bulk Measurements
- Tonnage
- PIANC - Guidelines for the design of fender systems.pdf
- boat and stream 2 pdf (1).pdf
- Naval Terms
- Indian Register of Ships.pdf
- 124 Arbitration Rules 2006 - Sampling Rules
- Skidbeam loadout
- Inclining Test Procedure-example
- Marine Rubber Fenders
- Lopez v. Duruelo (Ferrer)
- International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships (London 1969)
- Norsafe-Workboat
- Condition Format
- Pneumatic Fender Manual
- LIST OF EXTINGUISHER IN SHIP
- 11.06.2009
- Proximity, Proximity, Proximity Long
- curs 12 MET
- Ssss

You are on page 1of 15

Introduction:

The principal function of the fender system is to prevent the vessel or the dock from being damaged during the mooring process or during the berthing periods. Forces during the vessel berthing or anchoring may be in the form of impact, abrasive action from vessels, or direct pressure. These forces may extensive damage to the ship and structure if suitable means are not employed to counteract them. The amount of energy absorbed and the maximum impact force imparted are the primary criteria applied in accepted fender design practices. Selection of fender system type:

A variety of factors affect the proper selection of a fender system. These include, but not limited to, local marine environment, exposure of harbor basins, class and configuration of ships, speed and direction of approach of ships when berthing, available docking assistance, type of berthing structure, and even the skills of pilots or ship captains. It is considered impractical to standardize fender designs since port conditions are rarely identical. Previous local experience in the application of satisfactory fender systems should be considered, particularly as it applies to cost-effectiveness characteristics. Here is a good guide for selecting a fender system fit for your needs. We follow the PIANC 2002 and other Standards set forth by other manufacturers with a long history in the marine fender industry. General Design Procedure:

The design of a fender system is based on the law of conservation of energy. The amount of energy being introduced into the system must be determined, and then a means devised to absorb the energy within the force and stress limitations of the ship's hull, the fender, and the pier. General design procedures are as follows: 1. Determine the energy that will be delivered to the pier upon initial impact. It is recommended to consider the heaviest/largest vessel capable or allowed to use your dock. 2. Determine the energy that can be absorbed by the pier or wharf ( distribution of loading must be considered). For structures that are linearly elastic, the energy is one-half the maximum static load level times the amount of deflection. Allowance should also be made in cases where other vessels may be moored at the pier. If the structure is exceptionally rigid, it can be assumed to absorb no energy. 3. Subtract the energy that the pier will absorb from the effective impact energy of the ship to determine the amount of energy that must be absorbed by the fender. 4. Select a fender design capable of absorbing the amount of energy determined above without exceeding the maximum allowable force in the pier. Please contact us for our product catalogue. You can get specific performance information of our products.

ship is loaded to draft line. Total Volume of vessel and cargo. This is derived by dividing the total interior capacity of a vessel by 100 cubic feet. Total Volume of cargo that is carried by the vessel. Total weight of the vessel and cargo when the

food on the vessel.

Weight of Vessel.

Weight of ship and the water added to the ballast compartment to improve its stability after it has discharged its cargo.

Side Berthing:

Side Berthing is the most typical case for docks. The Berthing Energy is calculated by the following kinetic equation:

Where

WD : Water displacement of the berthing ship (Tons, Kg, Lbs). - This is the

Total Displacement Tonnage(DPT) of the vessel. If you do not have this information you may use our tables to view standard vessel's information by type and sizes. Please click here to view our tables.

VB : Berthing velocity of the Ship at the movement of impact against the fender (m/sec, ft/sec) - Berthing velocity is an important parameter in fender system

design. It depends on the size of the vessel, loading condition, port structure, and the ease of difficulty of the approach. Therefore the berthing velocity is preferred to be obtained from actual measurements or relevant existing statistical information. When the actual measured velocity is not available, the most widely used guide to estimate the berthing velovity is the Brolsma table, adopted by BSI, PIANC and other standards. To facilitate the calculations, designers can use tables, graphs or equations shown below.

Va: Easy Berthing, sheltered. Vb: Difficult Berthing, sheltered. exposed. Vd: Difficult Berthing, exposed.

CM : Virtual mass factor - As a vessel makes contact with the berth and its movement is suddenly stopped by the fenders, the mass of water moving with the vessel adds to the energy possessed by the vessel. This is called "Mass Factor" or "Added Mass Coefficient" and the weight of the water is generally called "Additional Weight". The added mass coefficient makes up for the body of water carried along with the ship as it moves sideways through the water. As the vessel is berthing a body of water is carried along with the ship as it moves sideways through the water. As the ship is stopped by the fenders, the momentum of the entrained water continues to push against the ship and this effectively increases its overall mass. CM is normally calculated with the following formula:

where, D: Full Load Draft(m, ft) B: Molded Breadth(m, ft) Another calculation method for the virtual mass factor is:

where,

Load

Draft Length

CE : Eccentricity factor - In the case when a vessel contacts a berth at a point near its

bow or stern, the reaction force with give a rotational movement, which will dissipate a part of the vessel's energy.

To determine the Eccentricity Coefficient, you must firstly calculate the radius of gyration(K), the distance from the vessels center of mass to point of impact(R), the velocity vector angle( ) and berthing angle( ) using the following formulas:

Where K: Radius of rotation of the vessel (usually 1/4 of the vessel's length) R: Distance of the line paralleled to wharf measured from the vessel's center of gravity to the point of contact. Usually 1/41/5 of vessel's length. CB: Block Coefficient, which is related to the hull shape and is is calculated as follows:

displacement

of

the

berthing

ship(Tons,

Kg,

Lbs)

: Sea Water density(1.025 Tons/m3) LBP: Length between perpendiculars. Please see sketch below for better explanation:

from

bow

to

point

of

impact

If the Length, beam and draft are not known, this table can be used to estimate the block coefficient:

Type of Vessel Tankers Bullk Carriers Container Ships General Cargo RoRo Vessels Ferries CB BS 6349 0.72~0.85 0.72~0.85 0.65~0.75 0.60~0.75 0.65~0.70 0.50~0.65 CB PIANC 2002 0.85 0.72~0.85 0.60~0.80 0.72~0.85 0.70~0.80 0.55~0.65

You may also use the following formula to calculate the eccentricity coefficient:

Some designers prefer to calculate the eccentricity coefficient using the simplified formula above. Care should be used as this method can lead to an underestimation of Berthing Energy when the berthing angle( ) is greater than 10 degrees and/or the point of impact is aft of quarter-point(x > LBP/4). To verify your calculations, the eccentricity coefficient values generally fall within the following limits:

absorbed by the cushion effect of water between the approaching vessel and the quay wall. The smaller the draft(D) of the vessel is, or the larger the under keel clearance( KC), the more trapped water can escape under the vessel, and would give a higher CC value. Also, if the berthing angle of the vessel is greater than 5, we can consider CC = 1. Case 1: Closed Dock A Closed Dock would be a wharf, where you have a concrete wall going directly to the sea ground. In this case the quay wall will push back all the water that is being moved by the vessel. This creates a resistance factor that can be calculated as follows: If KC D / 2, CC 0.8 If KC > D / 2, CC 0.9 Case 2: Open or Semi-Closed Dock A Semi-Closed Dock is a Dock that water can flow underneath the dock, but the depth changes below the dock. Open Dock is usually a dock with piles underneath and the water can flow freely underneath the dock. In such case we can assume the following value of 1. CC 1

CS : Softness factor - This is the portion of berthing energy which is absorbed by the

deformation of the vessel's hull and fender. When a soft fender is used, CS can be ignored. Otherwise, we can assume a value for CS 0.9

After the effective berthing Energy(EB) of the ship is calculated as explained above, the selection of the fender system should be conducted in accordance with the fenders performance(Reaction Force, Energy absorption, and deflection curve). The fender system selection has the following requirements: 1. Energy absorption of the selected fender system exceeds effective impacting energy of ships(EB). 2. Reaction force of the selected fender system is less than the ship's allowable reaction force. 3. Surface pressure of the selected fender system is less than the allowable hull surface pressure. You can meet the requirements by changing the dimensions of the frontal panel. 4. When the ship is berthing in a slanting direction, the fenders will bear a angular compression which will decrease the energy absorption at point of impact. Therefore the fender performance should be adjusted in accordance with the berthing angles when selecting the fender system. 5. The selected fender system should satisfy special requirements of extreme environments(high/cold temperature, strong winds, waves, high/low tides, etc.) 6. The selected fender system should be chosen wisely for the investment(performance/price). The price of maintenance and installation should be considered in your investment. Fenders that have an easy installation and maintenance are a better option for your investment. Fender Spacing: This calculations are critical, due to the possibility of a vessel hitting the dock structure while berthing at an angle. As per British Standards, for continuous quay, the installation pitch is recommended to be less than 15% of the vessel. Minimum installation pitch of fender can be calculated with the following equation:

Where S: Maximum spacing between fenders RB: Bow radius of board side of vessel(m, ft) PU: Uncompressed Height of fender including panel(m, ft)

C: Fender

height

in

rated

compression.

: Fender deflection(m, ft) If the bent radius(RB) is not known, we can estimate by the vessel's overall length( LOA) and width(B) as follows:

For vertical orientation arrangement, the types and sizes of all ships berthing shall be considered. All possible tides vary scope. To assure safe berthing we must consider the height and draft of the smallest and largest vessels to determine the point of contact on the structure. Do not design your arrangements considering only the largest vessels berthing in your dock, since your design might not work for smaller vessels berthing in your dock.

Fender

Panel

Design:

Hull Pressures: Permissible hull pressures vary greatly with the class and size ship. The best guide to hull pressure is the designer's experience in similar cases. If this information is unavailable, then the following table may be used as an approximate guide for design:

Type of Vessel Tankers ULCC & VLCC(Coastal Tankers) Product & Chemical Tankers Bullk Carriers Post-Panamax Container Ships Panamax Container Ships Sub-Panamax Container Ships General Cargo Gas Carriers

Hull Pressure 2 KN/m 150~250 250~350 300~400 150~250 200~300 300~400 400~500 300~600 100~200

Hull pressures are calculated using the frontal panel area(excluding lead-in chamfers) as follows:

Where P: Hull Pressure(N/m2, psi) R: Combined Reaction Forces of all rubber fenders A1: Valid Panel Width excluding lead-in chamfers(m) B1: Valid Panel Height excluding lead-in chamfers(m) PP: Permissible hull pressure(N/m2, psi)

Approximate Hull Pressure for other fender types: The above formula and table apply to berths fitted with frontal panel systems. However, many berths use Cylindrical and Archfenders safely and without damaging the ship's hull, despite the fact that these fenders exert higher hull pressures. The Arch Fenders have hull pressures of 760~1300kN/m2. Cylindrical Fenders have 460~780kN/m2. Also bear in mind that when cylindrical fenders are used with large chains or bar fixings through the central bore, the hull pressure will be higher to approximately double the above figures. Again there is no evidence to show that this causes hull damage.

Selection and Calculation of Chain: There are three types of chains in fender systems: 1. Tension Chain: The main function of the tension chain is to protect the fender from damage while it is under compression. 2. Weight Chain: The weight chained is used to support the weight of the frontal and face panel. 3. Shear Chain: This chain protects the fender from damage while in shear deflection. The following should be noted in the chain design: -Chain dimensions should be as exact as possible. Not too loose, not too tight. -The chain can not be twisted as this reduces the load capacity. -Open Link is preferred.

-The initial(static) angle of the chain is important. Normally weight chains are set at a static angle of 15 - 25 to the vertical and shear chains are set to 20 - 30 to the horizontal. -All chains must be designed or selected with a safety factor of 2 to 3 times of the work load. -The dimensions of the shackle is usually the same as the chain, but if the shackle is required to bear the same load with the chain, then a thicker shackle is preferred.

Where, 1: Static Angle of Chain() h1: Static offset between brackets(m, ft) 2: Dynamic Angle of Chain() h2: Dynamic offset between brackets at F(m, ft) D: Fender compression(m, ft) R: Reaction Force of rubber units behind the frontal panel(N, Lbs) W: Weight of the panel face(N, Lbs) FL: Safe working Load of chain(N, Lbs) L: Bearing length of chain(m, ft) n: number of chains acting together : Friction coefficient of face pad. Usually equals 0.15 for UHMW-PE facings. FM: Minimum Breaking Load(N, Lbs) FS: Safety Factor(2~3 times)

Dolphin

Berthing:

Passing

Lock

Entrance:

Ship

to

Ship

Berthing:

End

Berthing:

Please note that this information is only for reference. Please allow us to confirm your fender selection. Provide us with all the information needed to assure your selection. Please contact us. We will provide you with support for your fender system. We are committed to our clients from the design to the installation and even for future maintenance inspections and consulting. Please fill up our design condition form and send it to us.

- Dry Bulk MeasurementsUploaded byManoj Varrier
- TonnageUploaded byawhahn898548
- PIANC - Guidelines for the design of fender systems.pdfUploaded byDao Ba Thanh
- boat and stream 2 pdf (1).pdfUploaded byamit dutta
- Naval TermsUploaded byGeorge Kanellakis
- Indian Register of Ships.pdfUploaded byagarwal.rm
- 124 Arbitration Rules 2006 - Sampling RulesUploaded byAneta Kesic
- Skidbeam loadoutUploaded byBolarinwa
- Inclining Test Procedure-exampleUploaded bytalabiz
- Marine Rubber FendersUploaded bySuryo Wijiono Pambudi
- Lopez v. Duruelo (Ferrer)Uploaded bysdnayawa
- International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships (London 1969)Uploaded byAnanto Listyo
- Norsafe-WorkboatUploaded byokandandin
- Condition FormatUploaded byAshok Kamath
- Pneumatic Fender ManualUploaded bykip2008
- LIST OF EXTINGUISHER IN SHIPUploaded byDina Karan
- 11.06.2009Uploaded byragu benagekar
- Proximity, Proximity, Proximity LongUploaded byKim Gyr
- curs 12 METUploaded byIonut Daniel
- SsssUploaded byArafat Hussain
- 01 Somalia Reccommended Route - March 2009Uploaded bySeamen 777
- Lines PlanUploaded byMuhammad Teguh Perdana
- Christy De Voy Yachting/Production ResumeUploaded byChristy De Voy
- CS Caprice Rescue OperationsUploaded bySanjiv Behl
- SIW_SNMUploaded byMonique Krupinski
- Ulimate Guide to Welding NewUploaded byNadia Levinte
- Engineering Sciences2005!3!6Uploaded byBassemZaki
- Sea Career VCrewsUploaded bySajid Hussain
- Airlift Begins for Hundreds Trapped on Burning Italian FerryUploaded byThavam Ratna
- IMO formUploaded bypandipress

- STCW Guide EnglishUploaded byBenja87
- Ship Inspection ReportUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Bài Thuốc Cứu Tinh Cho Bệnh Nhân Mắc Bệnh Dạ DàyUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Bị Bướu Cổ Đã Vôi Hóa Chèn Ép Khó Thở Và Nơi Có Khối u Lại Thấy RátUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- TP_When Should a Towline Be Retired_MAY2009Uploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Certificates for VslUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- GMDSS Testing SchedureUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- 32_VIE_1Uploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- AnchoringUploaded bytaitommy
- Fender IngUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Gard Guidance to the Rules 2018Uploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- STCW-CONF.2-32.pdfUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- 34 VIE Hoan ChinhUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- OCIMF OVID Report Template QuestionnaireUploaded byAbdulkareem AlBabtain
- Rope Users Manual WEBUploaded byDonVic
- Chỉ Dẫn Khi Vào Không Gian Kín Trên Tàu DầuUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Nhìn Lại Một Phần Tư Thế Kỷ Đầy Biến Động Của Ngành Vận Tải Biển Thế GiớiUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- 120142Uploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Phân Biệt Các Khái Niệm Cứu NạnUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Cục Hàng Hải Việt Nam Tham Dự Cuộc Họp Ủy Ban Kiểm Tra Nhà Nước Cảng Biển Của Tokyo MOU Lần Thứ 28 Tại VladivostokUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Chặn Người Dùng Wifi Bằng FingUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- 3 xưởng đóng tàu lớn nhất Hàn Quốc đối mặt với lỗ lớn trong quý 2.pdfUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- 3 xưởng đóng tàu lớn nhất Hàn Quốc đối mặt với lỗ lớn trong quý 2.pdfUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Equipment SelectionUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Equipment SelectionUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Amsteel Blue Rope Inspection RetirementUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- Hội Nghị Tuyên TruyềnUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- TB AmSteel-Blue FAQUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- TB CM Rope Selection Usage Retirement MAY2013 WEBUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ
- VMU PresidentUploaded byAnonymous UCveMQ

- Casio ManualUploaded byMarco Caruso
- Frequency DistributionUploaded bySahibzadaAtiqRehmanShah
- Class X Magnetic Effect Question BankUploaded byRenu Mittal
- Balázs Bernadett Semantic Aspects of English PrefixationUploaded byCarmen Panuta
- Antenna+MatchingUploaded byKazirul Latif
- DS Wiki BookUploaded byeanwahm
- trgrUploaded byJeemon Vg
- PLS article.pdfUploaded byvenkat7tally
- Exams Questions Papers Sec1 5Uploaded byFranz Bonzon
- LeadAcid I&O 0806Uploaded byEngr Imtiaz Hussain Gilani
- Solution Charpter 4_2Uploaded byCANDY
- m150a Mock MtaUploaded byAdnan Ak
- Appendix B ScalarorDotProduct FinalUploaded byzalziza
- Vol04_Tab01Uploaded byAbel Saenz Lermo
- SincronicidadeUploaded byFioravante Furlaneto
- 05 EE394J 2 Spring12 Symmetrical ComponentsUploaded byBogdan Vicol
- Capacitor - El-fergany2014 - 2Uploaded byiraj
- n 2208057990Uploaded byByg Joe
- Effect of ozone pretreatment on low temperature CO oxidation catalystsUploaded byAlice Ho
- Ametek MCG Stepper CatalogUploaded byElectromate
- CH5Uploaded byMaruf_007
- Meha Desai ResumeUploaded byabhixeo
- Neal_Koblitz_Algebraic_Aspects_of_Cryptography_Algorithms_and_Computation_in_Mathematics.pdfUploaded byijiron
- Econmet Syllabus 3T 2017-2018 V24Uploaded byRichard Leighton
- BPCS Reference ManualUploaded bykriprasad
- Software Project ListUploaded bySanidhya Arun
- Dean, Read - 2001 - Modelling the Behaviour of Plastics for Design Under ImpactUploaded byalfredohhb
- 5.Valuation of BusinessUploaded byHalf-God Half-Man
- Autoclave b.V.Uploaded byhisaj4u
- Industrial Training Report-IPGCL& PPCLUploaded byBrajesh Yadav