79 views

Uploaded by vijayunity

Hazen Willam's

Hazen Willam's

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Pipe f.loss ReadMe
- Mechanical Design of Process Systems-Vol 1 (Piping & Pressure Vessels)_2 كتاب موائع وفالفات
- Mechanical Design of Process System-Vol 1 (Piping & Pressure Vessels)[1]
- Study of water distribution network
- Tugas 1
- ANNALS-2012-3-21
- Crane Fluid Flow Problems
- Facts at Your Fingertips
- CH1_Water Flow in Pipes
- KSB Selecting Centrifugal Pumps
- Pasrker EO Fittings
- Centrifugal Design Book
- headcalc
- `gawdz OnlineCalc
- In d 23277709
- majorandminorlosseslab5
- Jurnal Utama.pdf
- Introduction, Abstract, Conclusion, Reference
- Formula Sheet_HyE_2018_19.pdf
- Lab1_02

You are on page 1of 8

Friction head loss (ftH2O per 100 ft pipe) in water pipes can be estimated by using the empirical Hazen-Williams equation

The Darcy-Weisbach equation with the Moody diagram are considered to be the most accurate model for estimating frictional head loss in steady pipe flow. Since the approach requires a not so efficient trial and error iteration an alternative empirical head loss calculation like the HazenWilliams equation may be preferred: f = 0.2083 (100/c)1.852 q1.852 / dh4.8655 where f = friction head loss in feet of water per 100 feet of pipe (fth20/100 ft pipe) c = Hazen-Williams roughness constant q = volume flow (gal/min) dh = inside hydraulic diameter (inches) Note that the Hazen-Williams formula is empirical and lacks a theoretical basis. Be aware that the roughness constants are based on "normal" condition with approximately 1 m/s (3 ft/sec). (1)

Imperial Units

The calculators below can used to calculate the specific head loss (head loss per 100 ft (m) pipe) and the actual head loss for the actual length of pipe:

100

l - pipe or tube length (ft) c - design coefficient determined for the type of pipe or tube q - flow rate (gal/min) dh - inside hydraulic diameter (inch)

140

200

SI Units

30

140

c - design coefficient determined for the type of pipe or tube q - flow rate (litre/sec) dh - inside hydraulic diameter (mm)

10

76

The Hazen-Williams equation is not the only empirical formula available. Manning's formula is common for gravity driven flows in open channels. The flow velocity can be calculated as v = 0.408709 q / dh2 where v = flow velocity (ft/s) The Hazen-Williams equation can be assumed to be relatively accurate for piping systems with Reynolds Numbers above 105 (turbulent flow).

(2)

1 ft (foot) = 0.3048 m 1 in (inch) = 25.4 mm 1 gal (US)/min =6.30888x10-5 m3/s = 0.227 m3/h = 0.0631 dm3(liter)/s = 2.228x10-3 ft3/s = 0.1337 ft3/min = 0.8327 Imperial gal (UK)/min

Note! The Hazen-Williams formula gives accurate head loss due to friction for fluids with kinematic viscosity of approximately 1.1 cSt. More about fluids and kinematic viscosity. The results for the formula is acceptable for cold water at 60 oF (15.6 oC) with kinematic viscosity 1.13 cSt. For hot water with a lower kinematic viscosity (0.55 cSt at 130 oF (54.4 oC)) the error will be significant. Since the Hazen Williams method is only valid for water flowing at ordinary temperatures between 40 to 75 oF, the Darcy Weisbach method should be used for other liquids or gases.

Hazen-Williams coefficients are used in the Hazen-Williams equation for friction loss calculation in ducts and pipes. Coefficients for some common materials used in ducts and pipes can be found in the table below:

Material

ABS - Acrylonite Butadiene Styrene Aluminum Asbestos Cement Asphalt Lining Brass Brick sewer Cast-Iron - new unlined (CIP) Cast-Iron 10 years old Cast-Iron 20 years old Cast-Iron 30 years old Cast-Iron 40 years old Cast-Iron, asphalt coated Cast-Iron, cement lined Cast-Iron, bituminous lined

130

130

Material

Cast-Iron, sea-coated Cast-Iron, wrought plain Cement lining Concrete Concrete lined, steel forms Concrete lined, wooden forms Concrete, old Copper Corrugated Metal Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) Ductile Iron, cement lined Fiber Fiber Glass Pipe - FRP Galvanized iron Glass Lead

120

100 - 110 130 - 140 60 140 120 140 150 120 130 130 - 140

Material

Metal Pipes - Very to extremely smooth Plastic Polyethylene, PE, PEH Polyvinyl chloride, PVC, CPVC Smooth Pipes Steel new unlined Steel, corrugated Steel, welded and seamless Steel, interior riveted, no projecting rivets Steel, projecting girth and horizontal rivets Steel, vitrified, spiral-riveted Steel, welded and seamless Tin Vitrified Clay Wrought iron, plain

130 - 140

150

110

100

Material

120

110 - 120

Flow of fluid through a pipe is resisted by viscous shear stresses within the fluid and the turbulence that occurs along the internal pipe wall, which is dependent on the roughness of the pipe material. This resistance is termed pipe friction and is usually measured in feet or metres head of the fluid, which is why it is also refered to as the head loss due to pipe friction.

A large amount of research has been carried out over many years to establish various formulae that can calculate head loss in a pipe. Most of this work has been developed based on experimental data. Overall head loss in a pipe is affected by a number of factors which include the viscosity of the fluid, the size of the internal pipe diameter, the internal roughness of the inner surface of the pipe, the change in elevation between the ends of the pipe and the length of the pipe along which the fluid travels. Valves and fittings on a pipe also contribute to the overall head loss that occurs, however these must be calculated separately to the pipe wall friction loss, using a method of modeling pipe fitting losses with k factors.

The Darcy formula or the Darcy-Weisbach equation as it tends to be referred to, is now accepted as the most accurate pipe friction loss formula, and although more difficult to calculate and use than other friction loss formula, with the introduction of computers, it has now become the standard equation for hydraulic engineers. Weisbach first proposed the relationship that we now know as the Darcy-Weisbach equation or the Darcy-Weisbach formula, for calculating friction loss in a pipe. Darcy-Weisbach equation:

hf = f (L/D) x (v2/2g) where: hf = head loss (m) f = friction factor L = length of pipe work (m) d = inner diameter of pipe work (m) v = velocity of fluid (m/s) g = acceleration due to gravity (m/s) or: hf = head loss (ft) f = friction factor L = length of pipe work (ft) d = inner diameter of pipe work (ft) v = velocity of fluid (ft/s) g = acceleration due to gravity (ft/s) The establishment of the friction factors was however still unresolved, and indeed was an issue that needed further work to develop a solution such as that produced by the Colebrook-White formula and the data presented in the Moody chart.

The Moody Chart finally provided a method of finding an accurate friction factor and this encouraged use of the Darcy-Weisbach equation, which quickly became the method of choice for hydraulic engineers. The introduction of the personnel computer from the 1980's onwards reduced the time required to calculate the friction factor and pipe head loss. This itself has widened the use of the DarcyWeisbach formula to the point that most other equations are no longer used.

Hazen-Williams Formula

Before the advent of personal computers the Hazen-Williams formula was extremely popular with piping engineers because of its relatively simple calculation properties. However the Hazen-Williams results rely upon the value of the friction factor, C hw, which is used in the formula, and the C value can vary significantly, from around 80 up to 130 and higher, depending on the pipe material, pipe size and the fluid velocity. Also the Hazen-Williams equation only really gives good results when the fluid is Water and can produce large inaccuracies when this is not the case.

The imperial form of the Hazen-Williams formula is: hf = 0.002083 x L x (100/C)^1.85 x (gpm^1.85 / d^4.8655) where: hf = head loss in feet of water L = length of pipe in feet C = friction coefficient gpm = gallons per minute (USA gallons not imperial gallons) d = inside diameter of the pipe in inches The empirical nature of the friction factor C hw means that the Hazen-Williams formula is not suitable for accurate prediction of head loss. The friction loss results are only valid for fluids with a kinematic viscosity of 1.13 centistokes, where the velocity of flow is less than 10 feet per sec, and where the pipe diameter has a size greater than 2 inches. Notes: Water at 60 F (15.5 C) has a kinematic viscosity of 1.13 centistokes. Common Friction Factor Values of C hw used for design purposes are: Asbestos Cement 140 Brass tube 130 Cast-Iron tube 100 Concrete tube 110 Copper tube 130 Corrugated steel tube 60 Galvanized tubing 120 Glass tube 130 Lead piping 130 Plastic pipe 140 PVC pipe 150 General smooth pipes 140 Steel pipe 120 Steel riveted pipes 100 Tar coated cast iron tube 100 Tin tubing130 Wood Stave 110 These C hw values provide some allowance for changes to the roughness of internal pipe surface, due to pitting of the pipe wall during long periods of use and the build up of other deposits.

- Pipe f.loss ReadMeUploaded byFaishal Khairul Umam
- Mechanical Design of Process Systems-Vol 1 (Piping & Pressure Vessels)_2 كتاب موائع وفالفاتUploaded byHussein Ali
- Mechanical Design of Process System-Vol 1 (Piping & Pressure Vessels)[1]Uploaded bydiaccessltd_17172961
- Study of water distribution networkUploaded byMichelle Erasmus
- Tugas 1Uploaded bymdalimunthe_3
- ANNALS-2012-3-21Uploaded byhawxfly
- Crane Fluid Flow ProblemsUploaded by@sss
- Facts at Your FingertipsUploaded byOMID464
- CH1_Water Flow in PipesUploaded byHazem Almasry
- KSB Selecting Centrifugal PumpsUploaded by윤홍민
- Pasrker EO FittingsUploaded bygeverett2765
- Centrifugal Design BookUploaded byRehman Zahid
- headcalcUploaded byapandey070273
- `gawdz OnlineCalcUploaded byempeeno1
- In d 23277709Uploaded byRanjith Ǝ Luidin
- majorandminorlosseslab5Uploaded byapi-302662137
- Jurnal Utama.pdfUploaded byNovani Indra
- Introduction, Abstract, Conclusion, ReferenceUploaded byChiu Fong
- Formula Sheet_HyE_2018_19.pdfUploaded bysanjana jain
- Lab1_02Uploaded byEnock Omari
- Open Ended PrintUploaded bySalleh Said
- noman 125Uploaded byKamran Ali
- major lossesUploaded byMADHAV
- Fluid FlowUploaded byCule Tuong
- Meng 1011 Lecture 7Uploaded byNixon Ramsaran
- Design Report- IOTUploaded byRana Biswas
- HOME Page for Main MenuUploaded bypaniuatui
- dimension.pdfUploaded byHalimah
- 2 LaminarFlowPipes&Annuli NewtonianUploaded bykelrz
- DarcyUploaded bypiriv012

- Is 800:2007Uploaded bycrajtry
- 1125Uploaded byvijayunity
- 1122Uploaded byhemanth_kollipara
- 1121_4Uploaded bySrihariKyatam
- DataUploaded byshree_iit
- 1124Uploaded byvijayunity
- 1123.pdfUploaded byvijayunity
- 1121_1Uploaded byBhaskar Jyoti Das
- BITS Pilani Faculty Recruitment AdvertisementUploaded byvijayunity
- Guide Lines for Lift Irrigation SchemeUploaded byvijayunity
- Is 383 Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates From Nat.180180049Uploaded bylove9
- Ductile iron piping.pdfUploaded bysmani170
- IDC designs and standards.pdfUploaded byvijayunity
- 8348.pdfUploaded byvijayunity
- 5218Uploaded byvijayunity
- Standardisation of Piping SystemUploaded byvijayunity
- Revised Data (Roads&Bridges)Uploaded byvijayunity
- p6_professional_users_guide.pdfUploaded byqassimasa
- IS 3589-2001 MS pipesUploaded byiampatanjali
- Design of Well FoundationUploaded byvijayunity
- Design of Plate Girder BridgeUploaded byvijayunity
- Design of RCC PierUploaded byvijayunity
- Design of Box CulvertUploaded byvijayunity

- COM Momentum CollisionUploaded bythinkiit
- St010 502 Ship DynamicsUploaded bypramod
- A Review of Recent Experience in Modeling of Caving - Mark BoardUploaded byFajar Sariandi
- A generalisation of J2.flow theoryUploaded bymsyexplore
- NAFEMS Def Blast Loading Due to Conventional WeaponsUploaded byfoush basha
- Exercise 1 - ComsolUploaded byYves Garnard
- Edexcel-A-level-Bk2-Physics-Answers-FINAL.pdfUploaded byNasrin Sultana
- рисунки.pdfUploaded byLeo Kuts
- Outrigger system analysis and design under time‐dependent actions for super‐tall steel building_sFang 2018Uploaded byChan Pisith de Phal
- Clifford Cl (5, C) Unified Field Theories of Conformal Gravity, Maxwell and U (4 ) x U (4) Yang-MillsUploaded byKathryn Wilson
- ROTIUploaded bycaptyashpal
- FD STATSUploaded bysampreeti
- chapter15-1Uploaded bychangaboy24
- 0020294015578987.pdfUploaded byJohn Anthoni
- Strengthening With Carbon FiberUploaded byshafiullah
- 12_physics_sp_1Uploaded byVgarg Garg
- Dynamics - Chapter 15 [Beer7]Uploaded byapi-3709496
- Std-124Uploaded byMudit
- 2-1.pdfUploaded byPhutthithorn
- cjc Promo 2008Uploaded bycjcsucks
- Numerical Modeling of Diesel Spray Formation and CUploaded byLuis Alejandro Alvarez Zapata
- Experimental Study on Bond Stress-Slip Behaviour between FRP Sheets and Concrete (2003) - Paper (8).pdfUploaded byJulio Humberto Díaz Rondán
- Heat and Mass Transfer a Practical Approach 2 Ed 2003Uploaded byadionicel
- AnimationUploaded byJoão Travanca Oliveira
- 1989-4 Analisis of Curved Expandable Space Bar StructuresUploaded byEDITORIAL STARBOOKS
- bo0276.pdfUploaded byGhulam Mustafa Bhatti
- Tuomo Suntola- Back to the Basis – Observations Support Spherically Closed Dynamic SpaceUploaded by939392
- An Experimental Study on Characteristics and Behavior of Reinforced Soil FoundationUploaded byandresmelod
- CEE 254-1 RC IntroductionUploaded byAllen Brown
- Mechanical InterviewUploaded byRaj Verma