Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(a) More room for Remarks on the sections tendons in lower flange. (b) Better stability during erection. Fabrication Space for reinforcement Easy Easy Less than adequate Expensive form work Good Difficult Torsionally stiff and strong.
Adequate
Good 1) Very
inefficient. Very good, z 0.7h 2) Small ultimate moment capacity 1) Especially 1) Good for long span and Msw/MT large 2) Msw/MT
1) Light load and good for long short span. 2) Msw/MT large. LL DL.
Very good
1) Topping serves to tie all Application of composite sections Good for building construction sections together. 2) No form required for composite pour. The different types of sections can be compared by a measure of flexural efficiency . The flexural efficiency is defined in terms of the radius of gyration r as follows. Long span buildings and bridges. Bridges
= =
r2 ct cb r 2 ct + cb ct cb h
> 0.33.
allowable values. Note that the limiting zone is a restriction for the CGS. The individual tendons may lie outside the limiting zone. The following figure shows the limiting zone (as the shaded region) for a simply supported beam subjected to uniformly distributed load.
C L CGC
Locus of emin
Locus of emax
Figure 4-4.1 Limiting zone for a simply supported beam
The limiting zone is determined from the maximum or minimum eccentricities of the CGS along the beam corresponding to the extreme positions of
C.
The maximum eccentricity (emax) at any section corresponds to the lowest possible location of C at transfer, that generates allowable tensile stress at the top of the section. Also, the maximum compressive stress at the bottom should be within the allowable value. The minimum eccentricity (emin) at any section corresponds to the highest possible location of C at service, that generates allowable tensile stress at the bottom of the section. Also, the maximum compressive stress at the top should be within the allowable value. The following material gives the expressions of emax and emin for Type 1 and Type 2 sections. The zone between the loci of emax and emin is the limiting zone of the section for placing the CGS. The values of emax and emin can be determined by equating the stresses at the edges of concrete with the allowable values. Else, explicit expressions of
emax and emin can be used. Here, the expressions of emax and emin based on allowable
tensile stress are given.
The following sketch shows the stress profile in concrete when C is at the lowest permissible location due to self-weight moment (Msw) at transfer.
0
CGC CGS
kt kb
ct C T emax c b
Stress in concrete
Internal forces
fb
Figure 4-4.2
From the shift of C due to self-weight, the following expression can be derived.
emax - k b = or, emax = Msw P0 Msw + kb P0
(4-4.2)
Note that since MSW varies, emax varies along the length of the beam. Also, the stress at the bottom needs to be checked to satisfy the condition |fb| fcc,all. At Service The following sketch shows the stress profile in concrete when C is at the highest possible location due to the total moment (MT).
ft kt kb C emin T ct cb
0 Stress in concrete
CGC CGS
Internal forces
Figure 4-4.3
From the shift of C due to total moment, the following expression can be derived.
emin + kt = or,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
MT Pe MT - kt Pe
emin =
(4-4.3) Note that since MT varies, emin varies along the length of the beam. Also, the stress at the top needs to be checked to satisfy the condition |ft| fcc,all. If for a particular section emin is negative, it implies that the CGS can be placed above CGC. This happens near the supports.
Type 2 Section At Transfer The following sketch shows the stress profile in concrete when C is at the lowest permissible location due to self-weight moment (Msw) at transfer.
Internal forces
Stress in concrete
fb
Figure 4-4.4
(4-4.4)
Note that emax for a Type 2 section is larger than that for a Type 1 section due to the term fct,all Akb in the numerator. The stress at the bottom needs to be checked to satisfy the condition |fb| fcc,all. At Service The following sketch shows the stress profile in concrete when C is at the highest possible location due to the total moment (MT).
ft e3 kt kb C ct emin c b fct,all
Stress in concrete
CGC CGS
Internal forces
Figure 4-4.5
emin + kt =
or,
emin =
Note that emin for a Type 2 section is smaller than that for a Type 1 section due to the term fct,all Akt in the numerator. The stress at the bottom needs be checked to satisfy the condition |ft| fcc,all. The zone between emax and emin is the limiting zone of the section for placing the CGS for a given loading condition. The values of emax and emin for several sections can be determined at regular intervals along the length of the beam to get their loci. Note that the limiting zone for a Type 2 member is larger than the limiting zone for a Type 1 member. The following table shows a comparison of equations for Type 1 and Type 2 members. Table 4-4.2 Comparison of equations for Type 1 and Type 2 members Type 1 Maximum eccentricity
e= Msw + kb P0
Type 2
e=
M sw + fct,all Ak b + kb P0
Minimum eccentricity
e=
MT - kt Pe
e=
MT - fct,all Akt - kt Pe
The following example shows the calculation of limiting zone based on equating the stresses at the edges of concrete with the allowable values.
Example 4-4.1
For the Type 2 post-tensioned beam with a flanged section as shown, the span is 18 m. For uniform loads, the profile of the CGS is parabolic. The live load
moment at mid-span (MLL) is 648 kNm. The prestress after transfer (P0) is 1600 kN. Assume 15% loss at service.
Evaluate the limiting zone of CGS, if the allowable stresses at transfer and at service are as follows. For compression, fcc,all = 18.0 N/mm2 For tension, fct,all = 1.5 N/mm2.
500 200 150
200 250
Values in mm.
Solution
A) Calculation of geometric properties The section is divided into three rectangles for the computation of the geometric properties. The centroid of each rectangle is located from the soffit.
1 + 2 500 100 3
y
ct
CGC
900
cb
Values in mm.
Area of the section Area of 1 Area of 2 Area of 3 A = A1 = 500 200 = 100,000 mm2 = A2 = 600 150 = 90,000 mm2 = A3 = 250 200 = 50,000 mm2 = A1 + A2 + A3 = 240,000 mm2 Distance of CGC from the soffit y= A1 900 + A2 500 + A3 100 A = 583.3 mm
Therefore,
I1 =
Moment of inertia of 2
I2 =
Moment of inertia of 3
I3 =
Moment of inertia of the section I = I1 + I2 + I3 = (1.036 + 0.336 +1.184)1010 = 2.5521010 mm4 Calculation of moment due to self weight.
MSW =
B) Determination of limiting zone The values of emax and emin are determined by equating the stresses at the edges of concrete with the allowable values. The expression of stress is given below.
f =M
P Pey My A I I
+ + =
CGC
P
P/A
Pey/ I
My/ I
Limiting position at mid-span For emax, consider the load stage at transfer. i) Calculate e based on fb = 18.0 N/mm2.
Solving, e =
Solving, e =
emax = 455.2 mm
For emin, consider the load stage at service. i) Calculate e based on ft = 18.0 N/mm2.
Solving, e =
Solving, e =
emin = 418.4 mm
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Solving, e =
emax = 309.6 mm
At service For fb = 1.5 N/mm2
fb = - 6.67 - 0.0366e = 1.5 N/mm2 Solving e = - 223.0 mm
Since the values of e are negative the CGS lies above CGC. The position of CGS closer to the CGC is selected.
emin = - 223.0 mm
Similarly, the values of emax and emin can be determined at regular intervals along the span. The limiting zone is available by joining the points by straight lines.
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
CL
223.0 309.6
From the sketch of the limiting zone, it is evident that the tendons can be spread out at the ends. This is necessary to anchor the tendons and reduce the stress concentration at the ends.
With reduced P0 at transfer, emax is increased. Thus, the limiting zone for placing the CGS and the available zone for the shift in C under service loads are also increased.