Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
M-3005 Introduction
The centrifugal pump is second only to the electric motor as the most widely used type of rotating mechanical equipment in the world. It is not surprising that this is true in the typical nuclear or fossil fuel power plant, refinery, petrochemical, or chemical complex, where the use of centrifugal pumps is so prevalent. Since this is where the process design engineer plies his or her wares, it is necessary that engineers be familiar with the theory and application of centrifugal pumps. The portion of this lesson on pump system curves was adapted from "A Pump Handbook for Salesmen", written by D. B. Barta, now retired from the Ingersoll Rand Company. This handbook was never published, and was informally distributed within the Ingersoll Rand Company as part of a training program. You may notice some inconsistencies in the symbol definitions in different parts of the text. For instance, the symbol is used for rotational speed (rpm) in some cases, while the symbol N is used for rpm in conjunction with the pump affinity laws, because the affinity laws always seem to use that symbol. I have tried to define, or possibly redefine, the symbols used for each set of equations.
Page 1
Performance Parameters
When specifying a centrifugal pump, it is necessary to provide information on its performance characteristics in units that are universally understood and agreed upon. Generally speaking, these are as follows:
Flow
Flow through a pump is generally understood as the volumetric Flow, rather than the weight or mass flow, and normally is expressed in U. S. gallons per minute (gpm). cubic meters per second (1 cu.m/min = 4.4 gal/sec), or on large capacity pumps in cubic feet per second (cfs) (one cfs = 449gpm).
Specific gravity
Specific gravity is the standard method of expressing the density of the liquid being pumped, and is generally understood to be the ratio of the density of the liquid to the density of the water at standard conditions.
Suction Pressure
Suction pressure is the pressure at the suction nozzle of the pump expressed in pounds per square inch gauge.
Discharge Pressure
Discharge pressure is the pressure at the discharge nozzle of the pump expressed in pounds per square inch gauge.
Differential Pressure
Differential pressure is the difference between the discharge pressure and the suction pressure measured in pounds per square inch.
Page 2
g = gravitational constant w = work per unit weight which by definition is the differential head. Q = heat transfer p = pressure = specific weight Subscripts 1 and 2 indicate suction and discharge conditions respectively. If we assume that the elevation and velocity at the suction and discharge are the same and that the heat transfer, Q, is negligible, the first law can be simplified to the following: w = (p2 - p1) / = H where H is the differential head. Since we wish to express H in feet, (p2 - p1) must be in pounds per square foot, and the specific weight must be in pounds per cubic foot. Noting from our previous definition of specific gravity, that the specific weight equals the specific gravity times the specific weight of water at standard conditions, we have: H = p lb/in2 x 144 in2/ ft2 Specific gravity x 62.4 lb/cu ft H= 2.31 p
Hydraulic Horsepower
The hydraulic horsepower of a pump is the work which would ideally be required to produce the pressure rise in the pumped liquid. Recalling our definition of head as the energy per unit mass necessary to create the pump differential pressure, we can easily calculate the horsepower for a given flow and differential head by multiplying the head times the flow in pounds per minute and dividing the result by 33,000 foot pounds per minute per horsepower. Noting that the flow in pounds per minute is 8.33 lb per gal x sg. x gpm (where 8. 33 lb per gal is the density of water at standard conditions), we have: Hydraulic Horsepower = 8.33 lb per gal.x sg x gpm x feet of head 33,000 ft lb per HP min Hydraulic Horsepower = sg x gpm x head 3,960 If we substitute 2.31 (p1- p2)/sg for the head, we have:
Page 3
Brake Horsepower
Brake horsepower is the actual horsepower transmitted to the pump by the driver through the shaft coupling. In order to accurately measure the brake horsepower, it is necessary to measure the speed (rpm) and torque at the coupling. If these two values are known, the brake horsepower can then be calculated as follows: Brake horsepower = work in foot pounds per minute / 33,000 Work = Force x Distance Force = Torque / Radius Distance = 2 Radius x rpm x time Work = (Torque / Radius) x 2 Radius x rpm x time Work per min. = 2 x torque x rpm Brake HP = (2 x torque x rpm) / 33,000 Brake HP = (torque x rpm) / 5,250 Since instruments to measure torque at shaft couplings are expensive and rarely available except in test facilities, brake horsepower is frequently approximated by measuring the energy consumption of the driver. For a steam turbine, this would be the steam flow; for an electric motor, the amps, and for an engine or gas turbine, the fuel consumption.
Efficiency
Efficiency is the ratio of the hydraulic horsepower to the brake horsepower. Efficiency () = hydraulic HP / brake HP, therefore: Brake horsepower BHP = ( sg x gpm x head) / 3,690 x
Specific Speed
It is obviously not possible in this short summary to discuss the theory of dimensionless parameters in great depth. For our purposes it is sufficient to state that it seems intuitively logical that if any complex natural phenomenon can be described by a parameter calculated from variables, which could logically affect it, then it should be dimensionless, since nature should be completely oblivious to the man made concept of dimensions. If we apply this principal to centrifugal pumps we can see that the flow, the differential head and the speed are the variables which could be expected to describe pump performance. One could argue that a dimension describing the pump size should be added to this list. We will therefore recognize the validity of this argument by stipulating that the dimensionless parameters which result from flow, differential head and speed should be applied to dimensionally similar machines. The parameter which follows from this reasoning is known as the specific speed and is calculated as follows: Ns = N Q1/2/ H3/4 Where
Page 4
Q = flow in gpm H = head in feet N = pump speed The number that results from this formula is not the same number which would result if the dimensions were consistent. In order to make the dimensions consistent, we would multiply by the appropriate constants. Therefore, the conclusions drawn from specific speed calculated with standard parameters and inconsistent units would be the same as if the dimensions were consistent. Follow that? Words can be tricky as well as math! The concept of specific speed was originally defined as the speed which is required to produce a head of one foot at a flow of one gallon per minute in a machine that is dimensionally similar, but smaller. The concept is extended to state that at a given value of specific speed, the operating conditions are such that similar flow conditions can exist in geometrically similar machines. This is analogous to the concept of using the Reynolds number to predict fluid flow characteristics. As a result of empirical tests which have been performed on a number of pumps, the curves shown in Figure 2 have developed. These curves show a plot of efficiency versus specific speed for various types of centrifugal pumps.
Figure 2 Two points can be drawn from Figure 2; first, low specific speed pumps have very high radial flow components and high specific speed pumps have high or totally axial flow components. Second, the most efficient pumps fall in the specific speed range of 2000 to 2500. Although, strictly speaking, only the pumps with predominately radial flow components should be classified as centrifugal; in practice all pumps with rotating impellers, regardless of specific speed, are
Page 5
Performance Curves
The essence of the pump application to an engineer's work is to select the optimum commercially available pump for a given set of hydraulic conditions. Of fundamental importance to this task is the understanding of how to use and interpret the pump performance curves which are found in manufacturers catalogs. A typical catalog performance curve will consist of curves of head versus flow for various impeller diameters, lines of constant horsepower and efficiency superimposed on the head/flow coordinates and a plot of net positive suction head required (NPSHr) versus flow.
Figure 3 A typical example of such curves is shown in Figure 3. It should be noted that the pump curves which we are discussing here, and which comprise the vast majority of curves normally encountered, are drawn for a fixed speed which usually coincides with a standard motor speed.
Page 6
An understanding of the theoretical basis for these performance curves will prove a valuable asset in solving pump application problems. Let us begin our discussion of performance curves with the equation which is the theoretical basis for the performance of all turbo machines, the Euler turbine equation. Consider the generalized turbo machine rotor in Figure 4.The rotor rotates about its axis with an angular velocity N.
Figure 4 Fluid enters the impeller at a point near the axis, travels through the impeller following an undefined path and exits at the periphery of the impeller. Let us assume that steady state conditions apply; that is, that the angular velocity and flow through the impeller are constant, there is no heat transfer and fluid velocity magnitudes and directions do not change with time. Let us also assume that the velocity at any point at a given radius from the rotor axis is the same at any point on the circumference described by that radius. This means that at any radius the velocity of the fluid can be described by a vector at a point. Consider now the velocity of the fluid at the point where it enters the impeller near its axis and at the point where it exits the impeller at its periphery. In both cases the velocity can be resolved into three components, one parallel to the axis (the axial component) one perpendicular to the axis (the radial component) and one in the plane of the impeller and perpendicular to the axial and radial components, (the tangential component). Recall from Newton's law that a change in momentum (in this case velocity since the mass is a constant) results in a force being exerted in the direction of the change of momentum. Thus, we see that if there is a change in axial momentum as the fluid travels through the impeller, then an axial force will result. Similarly, a change in radial momentum will result in a radial force. In an actual pump, the two forces just mentioned do not contribute to energy transfer but rather produce forces which must be absorbed by bearings; the axial force by a thrust bearing and the radial force by journal bearings.
Page 7
The tangential component of the momentum (velocity) vector is the one which is most significant in describing pump performance since it is the increase in tangential momentum, created by torque, exerted on the fluid by the impeller which causes the increase in pressure. Recalling that momentum is the product of mass and velocity we would have: M = mV Where: M = tangential momentum m = mass V = tangential velocity m = Qt/g where: Q = weight flow (Ib/sec) g = 32.2 ft/sec t = time (sec) then: M = (Qt x V) /g From Newton's law, force is equal to the time rate of change of momentum Force= (Qt x V) / g x t Force= QV / g Torque = Force x Radius Force = Torque / Radius = QV / g Torque = (QV/g) x Radius Work = Force x Distance Work = Force x 2 Radius x t, where is rpm Work = 2t x Torque Work = 2t x QV / g x Radius Notice that 2t x radius is the tangential velocity of the impeller, or U. Then Work = (UVQt) / g, noting that head was defined as the energy (or work per unit mass) to create the pressure rise. Thus, Work = (UVQt) / g. And since mass = Qt, (Work / Mass) = head = UV/g. In order to develop a relationship between the head and the flow, we must consider a diagram relating the fluid and impeller velocity vectors at the point where the fluid exits from the impeller.
Page 8
Figure 5 Referring to Figure 5 we see that V, the tangential component of the fluid velocity is equal to U, the tangential velocity of the rotor, minus the tangential component of the velocity of the fluid relative to the impeller, Vru Head = (U/g) x (U-Vru) We also note from the vector diagram that Vru equals the radial component of the relative velocity, Vr(radial) times the cotangent of , the angle between a tangent to the impeller vane and a tangent to the periphery of the impeller. Vru = Vr(radial) x cot
Then H = ( U / g ) ( U Vr cot )
We now note that the flow through the pump, from the law of continuity, is equal to the discharge area (A) at the periphery of the impeller times the radial component of the relative velocity: Q = AVr(radial) Then Vr(radial) =Q/A Substituting into our formula above for head we have:
H = (U2/g) (U cot / g A) Q Note that for a given pump operating at a particular rpm, U, /g A We then have finally:
Head = K1- K2Q where K1 = U2/g,
Page 9
and K2 = U cot / area x g K1 and K2 are constants. Note that K2 determines the slope of the head capacity curve and is dependent on the cotangent of . If is equal to 90o, cot equals zero and the head is a constant.
This of course is an idealized treatment; in actual practice the hydraulic losses must also be subtracted. This is the reason for the characteristic head-capacity curve as shown in Figure 3. instead of the straight line. ~~ This explains the very flat performance curves that straight vaned pumps normally have. On the other hand as decreases cot increases, therefore so does the slope of the head capacity curve. Curve slopes for several values of are shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6
Affinity Laws
As we mentioned at the beginning of our discussion of performance curves, most pump performance curves are drawn for a constant speed, usually a standard motor speed. Frequently, it is necessary to predict the performance of a pump at a speed other than that shown in the catalog performance curve. The affinity laws are relationships between the flow, head and power and the RPM for the same pump operating at different speeds, or for geometrically similar pumps operating at the same specific speed, which permits us to predict performance at different speeds. Using dimensionless parameter once again, it can be shown that: 1. With impeller diameter, D, held constant: Q1 / Q2 = N1 / N2 H1 / H2 = (N1 / N2)2 BHP1 / BHP2 = (N1 / N2)3
Page 10
2. With Speed held constant: Q1 / Q2 = D1 / D2 H1 / H2 =(D1 / D2)2 (BHP1 / BHP2) = (D1 / D2)3
When the performance (Q1, H1, and BHP1) is known at some Particular speed (N1) or impeller diameter (D1), the affinity formulas can be used to estimate the performance at some other speed or diameter. The efficiency remains nearly constant for speed changes and for small changes in impeller diameter.
Page 11
hL = head loss in suction piping and pump suction hv = vapor pressure of pumped liquid expressed as head c = average absolute velocity of liquid through the impeller eye. (w2/2g ) = the local pressure drop below average pressure in the eye of the impeller when cavitation takes place (w is the average relative velocity and is an experimental coefficient). The local pressure drop is frequently referred to as the dynamic depression, and results from the fact that there is a pressure differential between the two faces of an impeller vane. This pressure differential is a result of the reaction of the liquid being pumped to the torque being exerted on it by the impeller vanes. Thoma theorized that the sum of the velocity head and the dynamic depressions is proportional to the total head: (c2/2g) + (w2/2g) = H where is known as Thoma's cavitation constant, and is less than one. If we assume the suction losses are negligible and substitute H for c2/2g + (w2/2g) in Bernoulli's equation we have: = (Ha + hs- hv) / H Since, as we have seen from the affinity laws, the head H varies as the square of the speed for the same pump at different speeds, or similar pumps at the same specific speed: = 1 /[2gH (c2 + 2w2)] = a constant This relationship is used primarily to determine the conditions at which very large pumps and hydraulic turbines will cavitate from model test results. Another approach that has been used to describe and study cavitation is the so-called suction specific speed: Suction specific speed = N (gpm)1/2 / [(c2/2g) + (w2/2g)]3/4 The principal of suction specific speed was arrived at using the principle of dimensionless parameters in a fashion similar to the reasoning used to develop the concept of specific speed, which was discussed earlier in this section. By combining the formulas for specific speed, suction specific speed and Thoma cavitation constant we have: Specific speed / suction specific speed = (Thoma cavitation constant)3/4 It has been shown by correlating the results of tests done on single suction pumps at their best efficiency point, that the Thoma cavitation constant is related to the specific speed as follows: = 6.3 (specific speed)4/3 / 106 If values for moderate specific speeds are calculated using the above formula, and then substituted into the formula: Specific speed / suction specific speed = 3/4
Page 12
It will be seen that the suction specific speed will be approximately equal to 8000. Now return to the original subject of our discussion, NPSH. Consider Bernoulli's equation for a system that includes the suction vessel and piping as well as the inlet eye of the pump impeller: Ha +hs = h1 + Hp + (c2/2g) + (w2/2g) This equation is the same as the one used to start our discussion of Thoma's cavitation constant with the exception that Hp has been substituted for hv, where hp is defined as the pressure at the impeller inlet eye expressed as head. As was stated previously, if hp equals hv, cavitation will result. Therefore, the pumping system should be designed so that hp is always greater than hv. Rearranging the Bernoulli equation, which we have just written we have: hp = (Ha + hs - h1) - (c2/2g) + (w2/2g) If cavitation is to be avoided, Hp must be greater than hv therefore: (Ha + hs - h1) - (c2/2g) + (w2/2g) > hv or, (Ha + hs - h1) - hv > (c2/2g) + (w2/2g) In a practical pump system design problem, the term on the left is called the Net Positive Suction Head Available (NPSHa), and is calculated just as shown in the left side of the inequality above. That is, the sum of the pressure head in the suction vessel and the static head of the liquid above the pump suction minus the suction system losses minus the vapor pressure. The term on the right is known as the net Positive Suction Head Required (NPSHr), and is a characteristic of the pump. In practice, no attempt is made to calculate the NPSHr by estimating fluid velocities inside the pump. Rather, the NPSHr is determined by testing each pump and noting the NPSH at which cavitation begins for flows throughout the operating range of the pump. The curve of NPSHr versus flow, which can be found in pump catalogs superimposed on the head capacity curve, is then plotted. Noting that: c2/2g + (w2/2g) = NPSHr, we have: (Ha + hs - h1) - hv > NPSHr See figure 7.
Page 13
Figure 7 Following the definition of NPSHr above, we can now rewrite the expression for suction specific speed as: Suction Specific Speed (Nss) =N (Q)1/2 / NPSHr3/4 For a properly designed commercially available pump, the suction specific speed will normally be between 8,000 and 12,000. The margin of NPSHa over NPSHr is a complicated decision and depends on many factors, including the liquid properties, size and h.p. of the pump, system operation, and control.
Radial Thrust
Any discussion of radial thrust must begin with a discussion of the flow space in the casing around the periphery of the impeller. Most centrifugal pumps have a volute casing, shown in Figure 8.
Page 14
Figure 8 Notice that the outer boundary of the casing starts at point A, where it is separated from the impeller by a small clearance. From there it winds around the impeller in such a fashion that the flow area available to the liquid discharging from the impeller is constantly increasing. At Point B, it joins the diffuser section leading to the pump discharge. Point A, the close clearance point, is known as the tongue, or cut water. The flow passage A-B just before the diffuser and discharge is called the throat. There are two schools of thought regarding the layout of the actual volute curve. One says that the volute should be laid out in such a fashion that the angular momentum of the liquid pumped is a constant at any point in the area around the periphery of the impeller. That is; velocity x radius = constant In practice, it has been found that this approach leads to excessive velocities at the smaller section areas of the volute, and that a better approach is to lay the volute out in such a way that the average velocity throughout the entire zone around the impeller is constant. This approach has been found to yield higher efficiencies and obviously implies that the curve be constructed in such a fashion that the flow area increases directly proportional to the angular displacement from the cutwater. The radial thrust on a pump impeller is the resultant of the pressure force acting on the impeller from the liquid in the volute. If the volute is designed so that the velocity is constant throughout, then in theory the pressure should be constant as well. In practice this is approximately true, at the best efficiency point, but not true at flows other than best efficiency. As the flow varies from shutoff to the end of the curve, the direction and magnitude of the radial thrust change constantly, passing through a minimum magnitude at the best efficiency point. Normally, the largest thrust
Page 15
loads are at shut off and low flow conditions. It is for this reason, among others, that it is not desirable to operate centrifugal pumps at very low flows, or at shut off. In order to reduce some of the radial forces which act on a centrifugal pump impeller, doublevolute casings are frequently used. Such a casing is illustrated in Figure 9.
Figure 9 In a double volute casing, a flow divider is introduced with its cutwater 1800 from the principal pump casing cut water. In this way the radial forces which build up in one half of the casing should be balanced by similar forces in the opposite half of the casing. In practice, complete radial balance is never achieved; however a substantial reduction in unbalanced radial force can be realized.
Axial Thrust
Of equal importance to the radial thrust is the axial thrust. Every pump from the smallest general service water pump to the largest multistage boiler feed pump must have some provision for restraining the shaft against axial movement, and counterbalancing axial force. In a simple single stage pump, shown diagrammatically in Figure 10, the axial forces are due to two causes: 1. 2. The pressure difference across the back shroud of the impeller at the suction eye. The dynamic effect of the liquid entering the impeller in an axial direction, and turning 90o as it changes direction to flow in a radial direction through the impeller.
Page 16
Figure 10 Therefore, the thrust could be calculated as follows: Thrust = (eye area - shaft area)x (shroud pressure - suction pressure) minus [(Eye area) ( density) x (axial velocity)2/2g Two things should be noted about the above expression for thrust. First, the dynamic force acts in the opposite direction to the force caused by the pressure difference, and secondly the shroud pressure normally lies between the suction and discharge pressure and must be determined by testing. There are three traditional methods of reducing or counterbalancing the residual axial thrust on a centrifugal pump impeller. The most common method is to drill holes in the back shroud of the impeller in the area of the suction eye. This has the effect of relieving the pressure on the back shroud. However, it also permits liquid to flow from the discharge of the impeller, through the clearance between the back shroud and the pump casing, through the balance holes and back into the suction of the pump. It therefore results in inefficiencies due to recirculation and due to flow disturbances caused by the leakage flow from the balance holes mixing with the flow entering the suction of the pump. Another method of achieving axial balance frequently used on single stage overhung pumps is the use of radial ribs on the back shroud of the impeller. Without such ribs, the angular velocity of the liquid in the space between the back shroud of the impeller and the pump casing has been shown by testing to be one half the angular velocity of the impeller. The addition of radial ribs on the back shroud of the impeller increases the angular velocity of the liquid and thus decreases the pressure. There is a theoretical basis for this effect, however it is omitted here since it is very long and complex and not useful or necessary for pump application work . The last commonly used method of axial balance is the use of a balance piston and chamber. This type of axial balance is used almost exclusively on multistage pumps and is illustrated in Figure 11.
Page 17
Figure 11 A solid plate or "piston" which rotates with the shaft is mounted on the shaft at the discharge end of the pump. There is a close clearance labyrinth seal between the circumference of the balance piston and the pump casing, and a low-pressure chamber outboard of the balance piston. Since there is a leakage across the labyrinth from the high-pressure inboard side of the balance piston to the outboard low-pressure chamber, the chamber is normally piped either to the pump suction vessel or the pump suction itself, thus permitting the leakage to flow back into the pump suction. If the labyrinth seal is good, this will also serve to maintain the pressure in the chamber at a level slightly above pump suction pressure. Since the resultant force on the balance piston opposes the resultant pressure differential forces on the pump impellers, the balance piston serves as a very effective axial thrust balancing device. Another version utilizes a balance drum and bushing where the pressure breakdown is done in the vertical close clearance between the rotating balance drum face and the stationary balance drum bushing.
System Curves
A centrifugal pump always operates at the intersection of its Head-Capacity curve and the system curve. The system curve is a curve which shows how much head is required to make liquid flow through the system of piping, valves, etc. The head in the system is made up of three components: 1. 2. 3. Static Head Pressure Head Friction from entrance and exit head losses.
Page 18
Figure 12 In Figure 12, the static head is 70 feet, the pressure head is 60 feet, (26-0) x 2.31. The friction head through all the piping, valves and fittings is 18.9 feet when the flow is 1500 gpm. In drawing the system curve, Figure 13, the static head will not change with flow, so it is represented as a horizontal line AB. The pressure head does not change with flow either, so it is added to the static head and shown as a horizontal line CD. The friction head through a piping system, however, varies approximately as the square of the flow. So the friction at 500 gpm will be: (500 /1500)2 x 18.9 = 2.1 feet.(Point E), and the friction at 1000 GPM will be: (1000/1500) 2 x 18.9 = 8.4 ft (Point F)
Figure 13 These determine the system curve, CEFG. All system curves are drawn the same way. The
Page 19
pump curve has been overlaid on the system curve in Figure 12. Unless something is done to change either the pump curve or the system curve, the pump will operate at 1500 GPM (Point G) indefinitely. If the throttle valve in the pump discharge line is closed partially, it will add head loss to the system and the pump can be forced to operate at Point H, (1000GPM), Point J (500 GPM), or any other point on its curve. This is essentially bending the system curve by adding head loss, and is known as throttling control. It is the most common form of pump control, but is wasteful of power since the pressure throttled out across the valve (FH or EJ) is lost.
Page 20
unavailable or very expensive, for example irrigation pumps. The low starting torque and lack of torque fluctuations generally make direct connected drives simple to engineer and relatively trouble free. Speed increasers are used many times with induction motors where speeds above two-pole speed (3600RPM @ 60HZ) are desirable, generally because of high system head requirements. A few manufacturers have single stage high speed (up to 25,000 RPM) pumps available with the speed increaser as an integral part of the pump. Speed decreasers are also used with induction motors and steam turbines, generally on larger low speed pumps where it is desirable to use lower cost higher speed motors, or mechanical drive turbines that operate most efficiently at speeds greater than 3000 RPM. When gasoline or diesel engines are used to drive vertical turbine pumps, they have right angle gears between the engine and pump, many times with a 1.1 ratio. For variable speed applications, fluid drives, eddy current couplings, wound rotor motors, variable voltage and frequency motors are available. On rubber lined and hard metal slurry pumps, it is common to use V-belt drives to obtain optimum pump speeds while using two or four pole electrical motors. Of course, steam turbines have the inherent advantage of variable speed, as do gas turbines.
Conclusion
Much of today's engineering at the design and production levels is performed by computers using commercially-developed programs. This has taken much of the day-to-day "dog work" out of engineering, and has freed up engineers to do more challenging and creative tasks beyond computations. However, it is essential for an engineer to understand what the computer programs actually do, and even more enlightening to be able to trace the origins of a computer calculation back to the basics of F=MA and the first and second laws of thermodynamics. Only then does one really understand, for instance, why a pump performs at it does. Fortunately, the derivations illustrated in this course are not performed every time an engineer specifies a pump! But once having studied these derivations, an engineer can use the streamlined computer solutions with some increased degree of confidence that he or she knows what the solutions are based upon. Perhaps the most practical and useful tools to the mechaical engineer presented herein are: (1) The pump affinity laws (2) Understanding the significance of and how to calculate NPSH (3) Interpreting pump performance curves
Page 21