Chapter - 1 Theoretical Framework

CHAPTER I THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

1.1 INTRODUCTION
Work life balance refers to the effective management of multiple responsibilities at work, at home, and in the other aspects of life. It is an issue that is important both to the organizations and to employees. In the current economic scenario, organisations are hard pressed for higher productivity and need employees with improved work-life balance as an employee with better work-life balance will contribute more meaningfully towards the organisational growth and success (Naithani, 2010). This issue has come to the fore due to multitude of changes in the work place, in employee demographics and in the family sphere. Global labour market is becoming highly competitive and companies are outsourcing to reduce the labour costs. As a consequence, the employees feel impelled to put in longer hours to achieve and possibly exceed the employers expectations in order to secure their jobs. Thus, the long hours culture and 24/7 life style has come to dominate the lives of highly educated and skilled professionals and managerial personnel. A few decades earlier, it was widely expected that new technology would shorten the working hours and bring respite and leisure to the work force. But instead of bringing relief and leisure, the developed technology has left the workers, especially professionals, with little time free from paid work. In fact, technology has blurred the line separating office from home and now the employees are expected to be available for office work, even while at home, because of the facilities that IT networking has

placed at our disposal. The present global environment has thrown up new challenges where workforce has to coordinate with the western markets that are almost 10 hours behind. Thus, the work has become more taxing and burdensome. These pressures and demands of work, reflected both in longer hours, more exhaustion and the growth of evening and weekend work, leaves little quality time for the family leading to problems like, juvenile crime and drug abuse among the children. Moreover, these work pressures are also having a direct impact on the health of the employees. Again, due to rapidly changing business environment, the organization are not able to provide secure employment and that is why the attitudes and values of people in work are also changing and they are less willing to display unconditional commitment to the organization and as noted by Guest, 2002, the decline of work as central life interest along with conflicting demands of work results in an imbalance between work and rest of life. The attitude towards life too is rapidly changing among the youth today. They believe in working hard and partying harder. They like to travel, socialize, pursue hobbies, take up adventure sports etc. When they do not get time for these activities, they are gripped by frustration and unhappiness. Family sphere changes that have impacted the work life balance of individuals in todays context include nuclear families, single parent households, dual earning parents, parents working at different locations and increasing household work. Hence, it has become very difficult to meet the family demands. Another change is the entry of women in workforce in a big way, while still continuing with their earlier role of a homemaker. So, women are playing a dual role, that of a breadwinner as also a homemaker. It is generally women who take the primary responsibility for childcare

and who, in situations of conflict, adjust their working lives to accommodate family pressures (Falkenberg and Monachello, 1990; Ramu, 1989). All this puts an extra pressure on women employees. Nathani and Jha (2009) has grouped factors influencing work and family life spheres into three namely, family and personal life related factors, work related factors and others. Family and personal life related factors include increasing participation of women in workforce, increasing participation of child bearing women in workforce, increasing participation of dual career couples in workforce, increase in single-parent/ single person households, increase in child-care/ elder care burden on employees and health and well being considerations . Work related factor include long hour culture and unpaid overtime, time squeeze, demand for shorter working hours, increase in part-time workers, work intensification and stress and changing work time. Other factors include ageing population, rise of service sector industries, technological complexity of work, skill shortages, loss of social support network, globalisation and demographic shift of workforce. As these changes at the workplace and family are affecting the work life balance of the employees working in various organizations, thus organizations are focusing on this issue.

1.2

WORK LIFE BALANCE: CONCEPT

Work life balance was initially conceived in terms of work family conflict

(Kahn et al., 1964), work family enhancement/ facilitation (Grzywacz and Marks, 2000), or, work family balance (e.g. Hill, et al. 2001). Kahn et al., 1964 defined role

conflict as the simultaneous occurrence of two (or more) sets of pressures such that compliance with one would make more difficult compliance with the other. Greenhaus and Beutell (1985) based on the work of Kahn et al. (1964), defined work family conflict as: A form of inter role conflict in which the role pressures from work and family domains are mutually incompatible in some respect. That is, participation in the work (family) role is made more difficult by virtue of participation in the family (work) role. Conflict between work and family has been found to be bi-directional (Frone et al., 1992a; Greenhaus and Beutell, 1985). Most researchers make the distinction between work-family conflict, and family-work conflict. Work-to-family conflict occurs when experiences at work (e.g. extensive, irregular, or inflexible work hours, work overload and other forms of job stress, interpersonal conflict at work, extensive travel, career transitions, unsupportive supervisor or organization) interfere with family life,. For example, an unexpected meeting late in the day may prevent a parent from picking up his or her child from school. Family-to-work conflict occurs when experiences in the family (e.g. presence of young children, primary responsibility for children, elder care responsibilities, interpersonal conflict within the family unit, unsupportive family members) interfere with work life. For example, a parent may take time off from work in order to take care of a sick child (Wikipedia, 2008). As noted by Grywacz and Bass (2003), how work and family intersect in a person's life, or rather how they fit, has been reported to have important ramifications for individuals and families. The preponderance of work-family research

conceptualized fit as the absence of work-family conflict (Barnett, 1998; Greenhaus and Parasuraman, 1999; Perry-Jenkins et al.,2000). However, workers' everyday experiences showed that work and family are both sources of growth and support as

well as burdens and strains (Barnett, 1998 ; Barnett & Hyde, 2001; Crouter,1984). This evidence suggested the possibility that work and family can benefit each other, and that work-family conflict is distinct from positive spillover or work-family enhancement (Grzywacz and Marks, 2000). Greenhaus and Powell (2006) also argued that work and family responsibilities need not always clash. From enhancement approach, a number of terms have been used to describe the positive benefits of work and family role participation including, work-family positive spillover (Edwards and Rothbard, 2000), work family enrichment(Carlson et al.,2006 ; Greenhaus and Powell, 2006) and work family facilitation (Grzywacz, 2002 ). Grzywacz et al. (2007) laid the conceptual foundation for work family facilitation and defined it as the extent to which an individuals engagement in one social system, such as work or family, contributes to growth in another social system. Workfamily balance was defined as the extent to which individuals are equally engaged in and equally satisfied with work and family roles (Clark, 2000; Kirchmeyer, 2000). Work-family balance referred to the degree to which an individual is able to simultaneously balance the temporal demands of both paid work and family responsibilities, whereas work-family conflict represented incompatibilities between work and family responsibilities because of limited resources like time and energy (Grpel,2005). In the recent years, it is being realized that life involves multiple domains and is not restricted to the domains of work and family only. Warren (2004), for example, noted that over 170 different life domains have been identified in previous investigations. The major ones include domains of work, financial resources, leisure,

dwelling and neighborhood, family, friendships, social participation and health. All these domains of life are closely related to each other. This means, that neglecting or inappropriately preferring one life area will have an impact on other areas. For example, spending too much time and energy for work could lead to health problems (e.g., somatic complains) or conflicts in the family (e.g., with ones partner), which in turn might affect the performance at work. On the other hand, spending too little time and energy for work usually leads to problems at the workplace and loss of employment which could also affect other life areas (e.g., stress, depression, family problems, less self-actualization). A broad term thus emerged in literature to refer to work/non-work conflict and it is Work Life Balance (Fisher, 2001; Hobson et al., 2001). It offers more inclusive approach to study work/non-work conflict compared to work family conflict. The term work/life balance was coined in 1986, although its usage in every day language was sporadic for a number of years. Interestingly, work/life programmes existed as early as 1930s. Before World War II, the W.K. Kellogg Company created four six hour shifts to replace the traditional three daily eight-hour shifts, and the new shifts resulted in increased employee morale and efficiency (Lockwood, 2003). Reiter (2007) categorized definitions of work life balance (WLB) according to a framework of ethical ideologies. According to him, definitions of WLB can be considered according to the extent to which the definition implies universal rules of what balance is versus definitions that are relative to an individual as well as the idealism of the definition. Idealism refers to the extent to which a definition infers that with the right conditions, the desired outcome can always be achieved, versus

definitions that accept that this cannot always be the case. When these two dimensions are dichotomized and crossed, they yield a 2 2 classification of ethical ideologies: situationists, absolutists, subjectivists, and exceptionists. Definitions framed from a situationist position (Clark, 2000; Greenblatt, 2002) focus on a fitting definition of balance for a person depending on his or her personal context. This will include their stakeholders, resources, and desires. Using a situationist definition of balance, people could be grouped according to their values and situational variables such as family structure, life stage, gender, career, or income level with varying definitions of WLB for different segments. The subjectivist definition (Amundson, 2001) is concerned only with the individuals desires and suggests that as long as they are happy with their WLB, nothing else matters. On the nonrelativistic side of the typology, absolutists (Greenhaus et al., 2003; Kirchmeyer, 2000) and exceptionists (Burton, 2004) definitions tend to be less concerned with the consequences of balance. Definitions framed within an absolutist perspective accept that rules can prescribe a right formula for balance. An example of this is Greenhaus et al.s (2003) definition of equal time, equal satisfaction, equal involvement in each of the work and home spheres to achieve work-family balance (WFB). This contrasts with exceptionists definitions that are of a utilitarian nature and seek to reflect the greatest good for the greatest number. Kirchmeyer (2000) defined a balanced life as achieving satisfying experiences in all life domains. Kirchmeyer went on to be more prescriptive, stating that to achieve satisfying experiences in all life domains requires personal resources like energy, time and commitment to be well distributed across domains.

Bailyn et al. (2001) defined work /life balance as harmonious and holistic integration of work and non-work, so that men and women can achieve their potential across the domains in which they play out their life roles. According to Fisher (2001) work life balance comprises of four components. The first component is time, i.e., how much time is spent at work, compared to how much time is spent engaged in other activities. The second component is related to behaviour, such as, work goal accomplishment, as work life balance is based on ones belief that he is able to accomplish what he would like at work and in his personal life. Two additional issues or components are Strain and Energy. Strain has been defined as a third source of inter role conflict (Greenhaus and Beutell, 1985). The rationale for including energy is consistent with the notion of time; energy is a limited resource and relevant to employee being able to accomplish work and/or non work related goals. He further suggests that work life balance, includes both work/personal life interference as well as work/personal life enhancement and gives three dimensions of work life balance, i.e., Work interference with personal life (WIPL) Personal life interference with work (PLIW) Work/Personal life enhancement (WPLE) Work/life Balance has also been defined as a state of equilibrium in which the demands of both persons job and personal life are equal (Work-life balance, 2002, The Word Spy). Greenblatt (2002) described work life balance as acceptable levels of conflict between work and non-work demands. This according to her usually involves managing competing demands for resources. She suggested that achieving work life

balance is dependent on attaining and managing sufficient resources to make possible the achievements that people regard as the most important. Lockwood (2003) defined the term from the viewpoint of employer, and of the employee. From Employees viewpoint: It is the dilemma of managing work obligations and personal/family responsibilities and from Employers viewpoint: It is the challenge of creating a supportive company culture where employees can focus on their jobs while at work. Lewis et al. (2003), Rapoport et al. (2002) and Taylor (2002) suggested work/personal life integration as a working terminology to capture the synergies and connections between different parts of life and the way they flow into each other. Duxbury (2004), in her research, defined work life balance as involving three things: role overload, work to family interference and family to work interference. Role overload is having too much to do in the amount of time one has to do it in. Thus, it leads to the feeling of stress, fatigue and time crunch. Work to family interference occurs when work demands and responsibilities make it more difficult for an employee to fulfill family role responsibilities. Family to work interference occurs when family demands and responsibilities make it more difficult for an employee to fulfill work role responsibilities. Hudson Resourcing (2005) defined work/life balance as a satisfactory level of involvement or fit between the multiple roles in a persons life. U.K. organization, Employers for Work-Life Balance (2005) defined work life balance as people having a measure of control over when, where and how they work, leading them to be able to enjoy an optimal quality of life. Work life Balance is achieved when an individuals

right to fulfilled life inside and outside paid work is accepted and respected as a norm, to the mutual benefit of individual, business and society. Swamy (2007) defined work life balance as a practice that is concerned with providing scope for employees to balance their work with the responsibilities and interests they have outside work. It enables them to reconcile the competing claims of work and home by meeting their own needs as well as those of their employers. Although definitions and explanations vary, work/life balance is generally associated with equilibrium, or maintaining an overall sense of harmony in life (Clarke et al., 2004).

1.3

WORK LIFE BALANCE: THEORIES

Several theories have been propounded to explain the work family linkage.

These include Segmentation, Compensation, Spillover and the Border theory. The earliest view of the relationship between work and home was that they are segmented and independent and do not affect each other. Blood and Wolfe (1960), who were pioneers of this perspective, applied this concept to blue collar workers. They explained that for workers in unsatisfying or un-involving jobs, segmentation of work and home is a natural process. The separate spheres pattern viewed the family as a domestic haven for women and work as a public arena for men (Zedeck, 1992).However, this view of segmentation was challenged by researchers who demonstrated that work and family are closely related domains of human life (Bruke and Greenglass, 1987; Voydanoff, 1987).

10

The Compensation theory proposed that workers try to compensate for the lack of satisfaction in one domain (work or home) by trying to find more satisfaction in the other (Lambert, 1990). Piotrkowski (1979, p.98) also concluded that men look to their homes as havens, look to their families as sources of satisfaction lacking in the occupational sphere. Two forms of compensation have been distinguished in the literature (Edwards and Rothbard, 2000). First, a person may decrease involvement in the dissatisfying domain and increase involvement in a potentially satisfying domain (Lambert, 1990). Second, the person may respond to dissatisfaction in one domain by pursuing rewards in the other domain (experiences that may fulfill the persons desires, Champoux, 1978 ). The latter form of compensation can be either supplemental or reactive in nature (Zedeck, 1992). Supplemental compensation occurs when individuals shift their pursuits for rewarding experiences from the dissatisfying role to a potentially more satisfying one. For example, individuals with little autonomy at work seek more autonomy outside of their work role. On the other hand, reactive compensation represents individuals' efforts to redress negative experiences in one role by pursuing contrasting experiences in the other role such as engaging in leisure activities after a fatiguing day at work. The most popular view of relationship between work and family was put forth by Spillover theory. Several researchers suggested that workers carry the emotions, attitudes, skills and behaviors that they establish at work into their family life (Belsky et al., 1985; Kelly and Voydanoff,1985; Piotrkowski, 1979; Piotrkowski and CritsChristoph, 1981) and vice-versa (Belsky et al.,1985; Crouter, 1984). Spillover can be positive or negative. Positive spillover refers to fact that satisfaction and achievement in one domain may bring along satisfaction and achievement in another domain. Negative

11

spillover refers to the fact that difficulties and depression in one domain may bring along the same emotion in another domain (Xu, 2009). Clark (2000) presented a work/family border theory - a new theory about work family balance. According to this theory, each of persons role takes place within a specific domain of life, and these domains are separated by borders that may be physical, temporal, or psychological. The theory addresses the issue of crossing borders between domains of life, especially the domains of home and work. According to the theory, the flexibility and permeability of the boundaries between peoples work and family lives will affect the level of integration, the ease of transitions, and the level of conflict between these domains. Boundaries that are flexible and permeable facilitate integration between work and home domains. When domains are relatively integrated, transition is easier, but work family conflict is more likely. Conversely, when these domains are segmented, transition is more effortful, but work family conflict is less likely (Bellavia and Frone, 2005).

1.4

WORK LIFE BALANCE: CONCEPTUAL MODELS

A number of conceptual models of work life balance/work family conflict/work

family enrichment have been proposed (Greenhaus and Beutell, 1985; Frone et al., 1992(b); Guest, 2002; Crooker et al., 2002; Kirrane and Buckley, 2004; Voydanoff, 2005; Greenhaus and Powell, 2006 and Kelley and Moen, 2007). Greenhaus and Beutell (1985) gave a model of the sources of work family conflict. They suggested three major sources of work family conflict (a) time based conflict (b) strain based conflict and (c) behaviour based conflict. The model proposed

12

that any role characteristic that affects persons time involvement, strain or behaviour within a role, can produce conflict between that role and another role. Time based conflict occurs when time devoted to one role makes it difficult to participate in another role or when time pressures associated with one role make it physically impossible to comply with expectations arising from another role. Strain based conflict is experienced when strain symptoms from one role intrude into and interfere with participation in another role. Behaviour based conflict occurs when specific behaviours required in one role are incompatible with behavioural expectations within another role. According to the model, work domain pressures include the number of hours worked, inflexibility of the work schedule, role conflict, role ambiguity, expectations for secretiveness and objectivity and family domain pressures include the number of children, spouse employment, family conflict, low spouse support and expectations for warmth and openness. The model also proposed that these role pressures (and hence, work family conflict) are intensified when the work and family roles are salient or central to the persons self concept. Frone et al. (1992 b) examined the antecedents and outcomes of WFC (work family conflict) and assessed whether WFC plays an important integrative function in work and family stress research. A comprehensive model of work-family interface was developed and tested. The direct predictors proposed in the model were job stressors (work pressure, lack of autonomy, role ambiguity), family stressors (parental workload, extent of children misbehaviour, lack of spouse support, degree of tension in relationship), job involvement and family involvement. The results indicated a positive reciprocal relationship between W-F conflict (work to family conflict) and F-W conflict (family to work conflict). Job stressors and job involvement were found to be positively

13

related to the frequency of W-F conflict. Conversely, family stressors and family involvement were positively related to the frequency of F-W conflict. Both types of WFC were positively related to a specific measure of within-domain distress. F-W conflict was positively related to work distress, whereas W-F conflict was positively related to family distress, at least among blue-collar workers. Guest (2002) gave a model outlining the causes, nature and consequences of a work-life balance citing recent research to illustrate the various dimensions. According to the model, the determinants of work life balance are located in the work and home contexts. Contextual determinants include demands of work, culture of work, demands of home and culture of home. Individual determinants include work orientation (i.e. the extent to which work (or home) is a central life interest), personality, energy, personal control and coping, gender and age, life and career stage. The nature of work life balance was defined both objectively and subjectively. The objective indicators include hours of work and hours of uncommitted or free time outside work. Subjective indicators refer to the states of balance and imbalance. According to Guest, balance may be reported when equal weight is given both to work and home or, when home or work dominates by choice. Spillover occurs when there is interference of one sphere of life with other. The model further indicates numerous outcomes of work life balance which include personal satisfaction and wellbeing at work, home and life as a whole, performance at work and home, impact on others at work, family and friends. Crooker et al. (2002) provided a theoretical framework to explain the contextual antecedents of work life balance by identifying the environmental and individual mechanisms and relationships that combine to create work life balance. They explained

14

how life complexity and dynamism affect work life balance and the moderating effect of munificence (abundance or scarcity) and accessibility of resources. The model categorized complexity and dynamism in clusters of home and extended family (number of people in the house, number of children, elder care, care of sick relative), job and employer (scheduling and reaching work, overtime, shift work, travel commitments, job transfers), occupation or profession (continuing education for personal growth, membership and leadership of professional groups) and community and free time activities. Further, the employer, family, community and profession domains were stated to be the providers of resources like, leave and time off policies, employee wellness programmes, employee assistance programmes, family supportemotional empathy, feedback and guidance, profession - training opportunities and conferences. The model argued that higher levels of life complexity and dynamism experienced by individuals results in lower levels of perceived work life balance. However, this relationship varied with munificence and accessibility of resources in ones environment as well as with individual differences of values and personality traits. Kirrane and Buckley (2004) put forward a number of theoretical propositions regarding the process and experience of work family conflict. The paper reviewed existing theoretical perspectives and engaged with the new border theory of Clark (2000). The individual variables included were two personality measures, conscientiousness and positive affect, and the work related variables included were autonomy and supervisory support (tangibles) and work role identification (subjective). They proposed that individual variables and work based variables (both subjective and tangible) will have impact on experienced work family domain conflict, which will in

15

turn lead to work based outcomes, namely, intention to leave and organizational citizenship behaviour. Voydanoff (2005) formulated a conceptual model that linked work, family, and boundary- spanning demands and resources to work and role performance and quality. The model proposed that work, family and boundary spanning demands and resources combine to create two dimensions of work family fit. Work demands-family resources fit derives from work demands, family resources, and boundary spanning demands and resources, whereas family demands-work resources fit results from family demands, work resources, and boundary spanning demands and resources. The two dimensions of work family fit combine with boundary spanning strategies to influence work family balance. Work family balance then affects work and family role performance and quality. Greenhaus and Powell (2006) proposed a theoretical model of work family enrichment. Work family enrichment was defined as the extent to which experiences in one role improve the quality of life in the other role. It was proposed that resources generated in Role A (work or family) can promote high performance and positive affect in Role B (family or work) and that the extent to which a resource heightens performance and positive affect is moderated by the salience of Role B, the perceived relevance of the resource to Role B and the consistency of the resource with the requirements and norms of Role B. The model specifies two mechanisms or paths by which a resource generated in Role A can promote high performance and positive affect in Role B. First mechanism is the instrumental path, by which a resource can be transferred directly from Role A to Role B, thereby enhancing performance in Role B.

16

Second, is the affective path, in which a resource generated in Role A can promote positive affect within Role A, which in turn, produces high performance and positive affect in Role B. Kelley and Moen (2007) proposed a conceptual model of how schedule control impacts work life conflicts and described specific ways to increase employees schedule control. The model suggested a direct effect of perceived schedule control on work family conflict. The model also suggested that enacting schedule control by changing ones behaviour will reduce work family conflict and simultaneously increase perceived control over when and where one works. The model further proposed three moderators i.e. gender, life stage and occupation. The article posited that schedule control is an important remedy to both chronic and acute time pressures and work life conflicts, with potential health, well being and productivity benefits. On the basis of various theories of work life balance/work family conflict and various conceptual models discussed above, it can be concluded that multiple factors related to individual, work and family affect the work life balance of an individual. Some of the major individual related factors include work orientation, gender, age, life and career stage, personality. Work related factors include role ambiguity, role conflict, number of hours worked, work schedule flexibility, task autonomy. Family related factors include number of children, spouse support, family involvement. Work life balance results in a number of benefits to the individual and organization which include personal satisfaction and well being, job satisfaction, productivity and the lack of work life balance results in negative consequences in terms of work distress, job dissatisfaction, absenteeism and high turnover.

17

1.5

RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY

The Indian economy is showing a robust growth with 8.5 per cent expected

GDP during fiscal 2010-11 (Times of India, March 23, 2010). With rising foreign exchange reserves, a booming capital market and rapidly expanding FDI inflows, India has emerged as the second fastest growing economy in the world. Information technology has been one of the promising sector for India and generating revenues both for the domestic as well as the global market. India's IT potential has attracted many multinationals to grab a share of the pie and cash in on the IT boom. India's domestic market has also become a force to reckon with as the existing IT infrastructure has been evolving both in terms of technology and depth of penetration. 1.5.1 Indian IT-BPO Performance The Indian software & services industry has shown a rapid growth since 2001-02 (Department of Information Technology, Government of India). The overall Indian software & services industry revenue grew from US$ 10.2 billion in 2001-02 to reach US $ 58.7 billion in 2008-09, translating to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 26.9 per cent. Despite the severe global recession, the industry grew at modest rate of 12.9 % in 2008-09. IT-ITES industrys growth trends are given in the Table below. Table 1.1: IT ITES industry revenue trends (in billion US $)
Year/ Item IT-ITES Exports IT-ITES Domestic Total Source: NASSCOM 2001- 02 7.6 2.6 10.2 2002- 03 2003- 04 2004- 05 2005- 06 2006- 07 2007- 08 2008- 09 CAGR 9.5 3.0 12.5 12.9 3.8 16.7 17.7 4.8 22.5 23.6 6.7 30.3 31.1 8.2 39.3 40.4 11.7 52.0 46.3 12.4 58.7 28.6 22.2 26.9

18

Exports dominate the revenues earned by the Indian software & services industry. The export intensity (the share of IT-ITES Exports to total IT-ITES Revenue) of Indian software & services industry has grown from 74.5% in 2001-02 to 78.9% in 2008-09. Total software & services exports grew from US $ 7.6 billion to US $ 46.3 billion in 2008-09, a CAGR of 28.6%.The share of ITES-BPO exports nearly doubled during this period. The total ITES -BPO exports increased from US $ 1.5 billion in 2001-02 to US $ 12.7 billion in 2008-09, a CAGR of about 39.2 per cent. BPO accounts for about 27 per cent of total exports. The Indian software and services exports including ITES-BPO are estimated at US $ 49.7 billion (Rs. 235,080 crore) in year 2009-10, a 5.5% growth in dollar terms and 8.7 % in rupee terms (Information Technology Annual Report 2009-10, Department of Information Technology). Segment wise export revenue trends are given in the Table below. Table 1.2: Segment wise export revenue trends in IT ITES industry (in billion US $)
Year/ Item IT Service ITES-BPO Software Products, Engineering Services Total IT-ITES Source: NASSCOM 2001- 02 2002- 03 2003- 04 2004- 05 2005- 06 2006- 07 2007- 08 2008- 09 CAGR 5.8 1.5 0.3 5.5 2.5 1.5 7.3 3.1 2.5 10.0 4.6 3.1 13.3 6.3 4.0 17.8 8.4 4.9 23.1 10.9 6.4 26.5 12.7 7.1 23.2 39.2 48.5

7.6

9.5

12.9

17.7

23.6

31.1

40.4

46.3

28.6

Though the IT-BPO sector is export driven, the domestic market is also significant. The revenue from the domestic software & services market is estimated to have grown from US $ 2.6 billion in 2001-02 to US $ 12.4 billion in 2008-09, a CAGR of about 22.2 per cent. ITES-BPO segment in the domestic market has witnessed noticeable growth over the past few years. The share of ITES-BPO industry in domestic

19

market is estimated to have increased from 3.8% in 2001-02 to 15.3% in 2008-09. The revenue from the domestic IT market (excluding hardware) is expected to grow to about US $ 14 billion (Rs. 66,200crore) in year 2009-10, an anticipated growth of 9% in dollar terms and 12% in rupee terms. The domestic BPO revenue is estimated to increase to about US $ 2.29 billion (Rs. 10,800 crore) in year 2009-10, a growth of 18.6% in dollar terms and 22%in rupee terms (Information Technology Annual Report 2009-10, Department of Information Technology). Table 1.3: Segment wise domestic revenue trends in IT ITES industry (in billion US $)
Year/ Item IT Service ITES-BPO Software Products, Engineering Services Total IT-ITES 2001- 02 2002- 03 2003- 04 2004- 05 2005- 06 2006- 07 2007- 08 2008- 09 CAGR 2.1 0.1 0.4 2.4 0.2 0.4 3.1 0.3 0.4 3.5 0.6 0.7 4.5 0.9 1.3 5.5 1.1 1.6 7.9 1.6 2.2 8.3 1.9 2.2 19.5 44.5 23.7

2.6

3.0

3.8

4.8

6.7

8.2

11.7

12.4

22.2

Source: Nasscom

1.5.2

Employment in IT /ITES sector The Indian IT-ITES industry is Indias largest employment generator in the

organized sector. The total number of IT and ITES-BPO professionals employed in India has grown from 0.52 million in 2001-02 to 2.21 million in 2008-09. However, the Indian IT sector saw slow hiring for most part of the year 2009-10 but this picked up a little in the third quarter. The global economic crisis sharply reduced the demand for IT services offered by Indian companies as clients tried to cut costs. The total direct employment in IT software and services is estimated to grow by 4% and cross 2.29 million in 2009-10 (excluding employment in hardware sector). This shows that a net

20

90,000 additional jobs have been created in year 2009-10 as compared with 200,000 in the previous year. The indirect employment attributed by the sector is estimated to be about 8.2 million (Information Technology Annual Report 2009-10, Department of Information Technology). Table 1.4: Employment in IT-ITES Industry (in millions)
Year/ Item IT Services & Exports BPO Exports Domestic Market Total Employment 2001- 02 0.17 0.11 0.25 0.52 2002- 03 0.21 0.18 0.29 0.67 2003- 04 0.30 0.22 0.32 0.83 2004- 05 0.39 0.32 0.35 1.06 2005- 06 0.51 0.42 0.38 1.29 2006- 07 0.69 0.55 0.38 1.62 2007- 08 0.86 0.70 0.45 2.01 2008- 09 0.92 0.79 0.50 2.21

Source: http://www.mit.gov.in/content/employment

However, everything about this industry is not picture perfect. Being a new industry that has witnessed phenomenal and quick growth, this industry faces shortage of middle/senior level managers although entry level recruitment poses no problem with plenty of talent available. Another issue is high attrition rates. The attrition rate in the industry has been hovering around 35%, which is quite high for any industry (Niharika, 2008). This industry has peculiar work demands such as long working hours, meeting pressing deadlines, working on holidays determined by geographic considerations, assuming pseudo identities, learning foreign accents, operating in alien business environment, altered social and family life, night shifts, and so on. Employees in this industry are burdened with work pressures, performance competition, stress and time starvation. In fact, software jobs have such high stress and punishing hours that they crush morale, deplete personal lives, and compromise health. All this is blurring the work life and personal life and employees are facing a big problem of work life imbalance. Increasing sickness among employees and the high

21

rate of attrition has opened the eyes of IT/BPO companies to the need to take better care of the physical and mental health of their employees and promote their work-life balance. Many IT companies are now setting up self-contained campuses that enable employees to manage office and home easily. Night-time work has come down from 100 per cent to about 60 per cent in the BPO industry. Women employees are given options like working from home, maternity leave extending up to one year, paternity leave for male staff to take care of their wives in the pre and post-delivery days, etc. Recent research has also shown lack of work life balance to be associated with a variety of negative consequences for both individuals and organizations. The consequences reported by individuals include increased levels of stress and somatic complains (Burke, 1988), depression and lower mental health (Beatty, 1996; Grzywacz and Bass, 2003),less life satisfaction, well-being and overall decrease in the quality of life (Adams et al., 1996; Aryee, 1992; Fisher, 2001; Greenhaus et al., 2003), decrease in the quality of family life, higher rates of family conflicts and marriage breakup (Crouter et al.,1989; Higgins et al., 1992). The consequences for the organizations include decreased job satisfaction and reduced productivity (Burke, 1988; Frone et al., 1992b; Higgins et al.,1992; Thomas and Ganster, 1995), greater likelihood of leaving the company, turnover intentions (Galinsky and Johnson, 1998) and increased absenteeism and rising healthcare costs (Goff et al.,1990). This research evidence strongly suggests the importance of achieving work life balance. A growing number of progressive firms have recognized the critical significance of work life balance and designed corporate policies and programmes to empower and assist employees in fulfilling their major life responsibilities.

22

Though the issue of work life balance is being widely discussed in United Kingdom, USA, Australia, New Zealand and other countries of the world, yet in India, not much research has been done and it is not very easy to find reference to work life balance polices and issues. Desai (2003) remarked that there exists little formal research in Indias work family field and few organizations in the country have family friendly policies, such as flexi time etc. Work schedules are complicating the matter for many families, especially in the BPOs where employees need to work at night. This according to her is the sector which needs to be addressed and researched. This present study of work life balance will thus, help in better understanding of the issue of work life balance of employees working in the IT and ITES industry. 1.6 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Work Life Balance of Working Professionals- A study of IT and ITES Industry. 1.7 OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS OF TERMS The operation definitions of the terms used in the present study are given below: (i) IT Information Technology (IT), according to the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), is "the study, design, development, implementation, support or management of computer-based information systems, particularly software applications and computer hardware" (Wikipedia, 2009).

23

(ii) ITES ITES, Information Technology Enabled Service, is defined as outsourcing of processes that can be enabled with information technology and covers diverse areas like finance, HR, administration, health care, telecommunication, manufacturing etc. (http://www.call-centers-india.com/ites.html ) (iii) Work life balance Work Life Balance refers to the sum total of the scores attained by the working professional on three dimensions namely, work interference with personal life, personal life interference with work and work/ personal life enhancement as measured by work life balance scale (Hayman, 2005). (iv) Working professional According to Macmillian Dictionary (2009), a professional is someone who has special skills or qualifications. For the purpose of the present study working professional refers to employees in IT or ITES industry who have acquired special skills to enable themselves to work in IT or ITES industry ( e.g. data management, networking, engineering computer hardware, database and software design, management and administration of entire systems, customer interaction services, e.g., call/contact centres and email help desks, engineering and design, back office processing, finance and accounting (provided remotely), insurance claims processing (provided remotely), HR services (provided remotely), web site development and maintenance services, data search, integration and analysis,, IT facilities management (including provided remotely), network consulting and management).

24

1.8

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The studys findings will help to identify the individual, family, and work

related variables related to work life balance. Thus the study would help the industry practitioners to: (a) understand the work life balance and its various dimensions; (b) understand the relationship between individual related variables; family related variables; and work life balance and design interventions for enhancing emotional intelligence of working professionals and also design support systems to enable the working professionals to shoulder their family responsibilities, and thus, reduce interference of family life in work; and (c) redesign work related variables such as task variety, task autonomy and work schedule flexibility so as to improve work life balance of working professionals. In addition the study will help in taking stock of the existing programmes for enhancing work life balance and evolving strategies for strengthening those existing programmes. The industry would be able to formulate policies for recruitment, development and deployment of professionals, thus leading to better talent management and reduction in costs. REFRENCES Adams, G.A., King, L.A., & King, D.W. (1996). Relationship of job and family involvement, family social support, and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 411-420. Amundson, N.E. (2001). Three-dimensional living. Journal of Employment Counseling, 38, 114-128. Aryee, S. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among married professional women: Evidence from Singapore. Human Relations, 45(8), 813-835.

25

Bailyn, L., Drago, R., & Kochan, T.A. (2001). Integrating work and family life: A holistic approach . A Report of the Sloan Work Family Policy Network. MIT Sloan School of Management, Boston M.A. Barnett, R.C. (1998). Toward a review and reconceptualization of the work/family literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 124, 125-182. Barnett, R.C., & Hyde, J.S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family. An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56, 781-796. Beatty, C.A. (1996). The stress of managerial and professional women: Is the price too high? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 233-251. Belsky, J., Perry-Jenkins, M., & Crouter, A. (1985). The work-family interface and marital change across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 205-220. Bellavia, G.M. & Frone, M.R. (2005). Workfamily conflict. In J. Barling, E.K. Kelloway & M.R. Frone (Eds.), Handbook of Work Stress, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 113-147. Blood, R.O., & Wolfe, D.M. (1960). Husbands and Wives. New York: MacMillan, 1960. Burke, R.J. (1988). Some antecedents and consequences for work-family conflict. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 287-302. Burke, R.J., & Greenglass, E. (1987). Work and family. In C.L.Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York: Wiley. pp. 273-320. Burton, C. (2004). What does work-life balance mean anyway? Journal for Quality and Participation, 27, 12-13. Carlson, D.S., Kacmar, K.M., Wayne, J.H., & Grzywacz, J.G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131-164.

26

Champoux, J.E. (1978). Perceptions of work and non work: A reexamination of the compensatory and spillover models. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 5, 402-422. Clark, S.C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747-770. Clarke, M., Koch, L., & Hill, E. (2004). The workfamily interface: Differentiating balance and fit. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33(2), 121-40. Crouter, A. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work family interface. Human Relations, 37(6),425-442. Crooker, K. J., Smith, F. L., & Tabak, F.(2002). Creating work-life balance: A model of pluralism across life domains. Human Resource Development Review, 1(4), 387-419. Crouter, A. C., Perry-Jenkins, M., Huston, T. L., & Crawford, D. W. (1989). The influence of work-inducted psychological states on behavior at home. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 273-292. Department of Information Technology (2010). Information Technology Annual Report 2009-10. Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Government of India. Desai, T.P. (2003). Workfamily conflict in India: An emerging concept? Sloan Work and Family Research Network, 5(3). Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/The_Network_News/5-3/TNN5-3_Desai.pdf Duxbury, L. (2004). Dealing with work-life issues in the workplace: Standing still is not an option. The 2004 Don Wood Lecture in Industrial Relations. Retrieved January 4, 2007, from http://irc.queensu.ca/gallery/1/dwls-linda-duxbury-onwork-life-conflict.pdf Edwards, J.R., & Rothbard, N.P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family : Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs . Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178-199.

27

Employers for Work-Life Balance (2005). Work-life balance: An introduction. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from www.employersforwork-

lifebalance.org.uk/work/definition.htm Falkenberg, L. and Monachello, M. (1990). Dual career and dual income families: Do they have different needs? Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4-5), 339-351. Fisher, G.G. (2001). Work/Personal Life Balance: A Construct Development Study (Doctoral Dissertation, Bowling Green State University, USA). Retrieved February 7, 2008, from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3038411) Frone, M.R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M.L. (1992a). Prevalence of work-family conflict: Are work and family boundaries asymmetrically permeable? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 723-729. Frone, M.R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M.L. (1992b). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65-78. Galinsky, E., & Johnson, A.A. (1998). Reframing the Business Case for Work life Initiatives. New York: Families and Work Institute. GDP to grow at 8.5% in 2010-11, says Pranab. (2010, March 23). Times of India. Retrieved April 14, 2010, from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ biz/ india-business/ GDP- to- grow- at- 85- in- 2010- 11-says- Pranab/ articleshow/ 5714174.cms Goff, S.J., Mount, M.K., & Jamison, R.L. (1990). Employer supported child care, work family conflict, and absenteeism: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 43, 793-809. Greenblatt, E. (2002). Work/life balance: Wisdom or whining. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 177-194. Greenhaus, J.H., & Beutell, N.J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76-88.

28

Greenhaus, J.H., Collins, K.M., & Shaw, J.D. (2003). The relation between workfamily balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 510-531. Greenhaus, J.H., & Parasuraman, S. (1999). Research on work, family, and gender: Current status and future directions. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 391-412. Greenhaus, J.H., & Powell, G.N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment . Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72-92. Grpel, P. (2005). On the Theory of Life Balance: The Relation to Subjective Well-Being and the Role of Self - Regulation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Osnabrck, Germany). Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=976856646&dok_var=d1&dok_ext= pdf&filename=976856646.pdf Grzywacz, J.G. (2002). Toward a theory of work-family enrichment. Paper presentation, 34th Annual Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, November, Houston, TX. Grzywacz, J.G., & Bass, B.L. (2003). Work, family and mental health: Testing different models of work-family fit. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 248-262. Grzywacz, J.G., Carlson, D.S., Kacmar, K. M., & Wayne, J.H. (2007). A multi-level perspective on the synergies between work and family. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 559-574. Grzywacz, J.G., & Marks, N.F (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111-126. Guest, D.E. (2002). Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Social Science Information, 41(2), 255-279. Higgins, C.A., Duxbury, L.E., & Irving, R.H. (1992). Work-family conflict in the dual career family. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 51-75

29

Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50(1), 49-65. Hobson, C.J., Delunas, L., & Kesic, D. (2001). Compelling evidence of the need for corporate work/life balance initiatives: Results from a national survey of stressful life events. Journal of Employment Counseling, 38, 38-44. Hudson Resourcing (2005). The case for work/life balance: Closing the gap between policy and practice, 20:20 Series. Hudson Global Resources. Retrieved May 7, 2008, from http://au.hudson.com/documents/ emp_au_Hudson_Work-

Life_A4_Std.pdf Information Technology (n.d.). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved August 28, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_ technology Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoek, J.D., & Rosenthal, R.A. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. New York: Wiley. Kelly, E.L., & Moen, P. (2007). Rethinking the clockwork of work: Why schedule control may pay off at work and at home . Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4), 487-506. Kelly, R., & Voydanoff,P. (1985). Work/family role strain among employed parents. Family Relations, 32, 367-374. Kirchmeyer, C. (2000). Work-life initiatives: Greed or benevolence regarding workers time? In C.L. Cooper & D.M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in Organizational Behavior. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 79-93. Kirrane, M., & Buckley, F. (2004). Contributing to work family domain conflict : Exploring the avenues. (LInK Working Paper Series, 06-04). Retrieved March 14, 2009, from www.link.dcu.ie/publications/ workingpaperseries Lambert, S.J. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations, 43(3), 239-257.

30

Lewis, S., Rapoport, R., & Gambles, R. (2003). Reflections on the integration of paid work and the rest of life. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18 (8), 824-841. Lockwood, N.R. (2003). Work/Life Balance: Challenges and Solutions, Society for Human Resource Management: Research Quarterly, 2, 1-10. Naithani, P. (2010). Overview of Work-life balance discourse and its relevance in current economic scenario. Asian Social Science, 6(6), 148-155. Naithani, P. & Jha, A.N. (2009). An empirical study of work and family life spheres and emergence of work-life balance initiatives under uncertain economic scenario, Growth - MTI, 37 (1), 69-73. Niharika (2008). Challenges for the Indian BPO. ICMR Case Studies and Management Resources. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://www.icmrindia.org/ free%20resources/articles/CHALLENGES%20FOR%20THE%20INDIAN%20 BPO1.htm Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R.L., & Crouter, A.C. (2000). Work and family in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 981-998. Piotrkowski, C. (1979). Work and The Family System. New York: The Free Press. Piotrkowski, C., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1981). Womens job and family adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 126-147. Professional (n.d.). In Macmillan online dictionary. Retrieved August 28, 2009, from http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/professional _23 Ramu, G.N. (1989). Women, Work and Marriage in Urban India: A Study of Dual and Single-Earner Couples. New Delhi: Sage. Rapoport, R., Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J.K., and Pruitt, B.H. (2002). Beyond Work-Family Balance: Advancing Gender Equity and Workplace Performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Reiter, N. (2007). Work life balance: what do you mean? The ethical ideology underpinning appropriate application. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 273.

31

Swami (2007). Work-life Balance: Organizational strategies for sustainable growth. HRM Review, October, 33-37. Taylor, R. (2002). The future of work-life balance. ESRC Future of Work Programme Seminar Series. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ ESRCInfoCentre/Images/fow_publication_2_tcm6-6060.pdf Thomas, L.T., & Ganster, D.C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6-15. Voydanoff, P. (1987). Work and Family Life. Newbury Park,CA: Sage. Voydanoff, P. (2005). Toward a conceptualization of perceived work family fit and balance: a demand and resources approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 822-836. Warren, T. (2004). Working part-time: Achieving a successful work-life balance? The British Journal of Sociology, 55, 99-122. Work family conflict (n.d.). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved May 12, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-family_conflict Work-life balance (2002). In, The Word Spy. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from http://www.wordspy.com/words/work-lifebalance.asp Xu, L. (2009). View on Work-family linkage and work-family conflict model. International Journal of Business and Management, 4 (12), 229-233. Zedeck, S. (1992). Work, Families, and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

32