2

3
4
6
7
8
9
10
I I
12
13
14
J -
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
....
-.CIIIr
'0.....
_
".,,,,
..
..
-
,,,.
THE IC[PAL COURT OF THE CITY OF RE 0
CO TY OF WA HOE, TATE OF, EVADA
ReNo /l,fF:/I..
ol'
N
tCtp
O
Pi. No"'L COl;
MAr> . 3 Rr
CITY OF RE 0,
Case o l ~ ~ 268W f 3 2012
Plaintiff,
Dept. 3 OOR
O"TH
vs.
ZACHAR Y BARKER COUGHUN,
Defendant.
~ /
SUA SPO TE ORD ER DE rvr G RELIEF SO GHT IN fMl'ROP ER DOC ME T
On March 7, 2012, at I :58 p.m., defendant Zachary Barker Coughlin, an attorney and
self-represented Litigant in the instant traffic citation case, began fax -filing a 224-page
document to the Reno Municipal Court purponing to seek variou and sundry types of relief
from this court on a Boul :vard top" traffic citation matter. He labeled his docwnent " otice
of Appeal of ummary Contempt Order; Motion to Return Personal Property Confiscated by
Reno unicipaJ Court and Its Mar hals; Motion for ew Trial and to Alter or Amend
ummary Contempt Order." aid document was filed by the Clerk of the Coun, after much
disruption to the court operations.
The court herein issues this Order sua sponte to prevent the plaintiff, Reno City
Anomey, from devoting any additional time or re ources to thi document, and to relieve the
plaintiff from any burden of attempting to respond to said docwnenl. Likewise, the court staff
relieved of any obligation to further deal with thi aberrant document.
The court find that the defendant has failed to follow proper legal procedure in
preparin and filing a mice of Appeal, or motion with appropriate citations to the record, the
facts and the applicable law, and argument thereof, and has blatantly abused the court ' s fax-
ftIing process offered for the convenience of parties appearing in this court. Furthermore, the
--
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
19
20
21
2
23
documentfiled by Mr. Coughlinappearsto contain aseriesofdisjointed legal ramblings
pluckedfrom onlineresourcesthatareneitherrelevant norapplicableto thematters in this case.
ITI ORDEREDthatanyand all reliefsought by thedefendantZacharyBarker
Coughlinin theabove-describeddocument is denied;at such timeas Mr. Coughlin files a
correctand propermotionornotice, his legal documentswill beconsidered by the coun.
IT[S F RTHERORDEREDthatZacharyBarkerCoughlinshall refrain from, and is
herebybarredand prohibited from faxi nganydocuments to Reno Municipal COUll.
ITI ALSOORDEREDthat ifZacharyBarkerCoughl inwishesto file documentsin
Reno Municipal Courtonanymallerassigned to Department3,he mustpresentsigned
original only,in appropriatelegal form and format, limited to no morethan 15 pagesin length,
and beforetheyarefiled, theclerkofthecoun hall presentthem to this court for re iew in
chambers,and thi courtwill makeapre-filingdetermination iftheycan be filed by the clerk.
IT I 0 ORDERED
Dated this 13th dayofMarch, 2012.
~ y ~ ~
TheHan.Dor0tl1y ash Holmes
Reno Municipal Judge
.....
..............,
PO .. nc.
_..-
28
2
--
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Reno_Ccun

Judge
P.O Box1100
Reno. 8i505

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of the Reno Municipal
Court,Reno,Nevada,thatIam overthe age of18 years and notapartytothe above
action,and thaton thisdate,served atrue and correctcopyofthe attached document
tothefollowing as setforth below:
Allison Ormaas
DeputyCityAttorney
PO Box1900
Reno NV89505
ZacharyBarkerCoughlin, Esq.
1422E. 9
th
Street#2
RenoNV89512
X Placing saiddocumentin asealedenvelopeand placed forcollecting and
mailing byUnites Statesmailin Reno,Nevada,postageprepaidfollowing ordinary
businesspractices.
WashoeCountyJail
CourtServices
Facsimile(FFAX)
ElectronicMail (E-mail)
Inner-office mail followingordinarybusiness practices
PersonalDelivery.
DATED: March 13,2012.
--
_
-
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
19
20
21
22
23
_4
25
6
.....
.....,...."'"'"

...-
28
RECEIVED
FILED
Case o. IITR 2680021
APR 13 2012
I.:; 'W'1'CIPh L COURT
Dept. 0.3
Reno Court
"I ' ... I) "0 IU .. lid \ .:, , 10 I I :


':;L,:,.j\.... loCURT
BY
IN THEMUNICIPALCOURTOFTHECITYOFRENODEPUTY
CO TYOF WASHOESTATEOF EVADA
CITYOFRENO,
Plaintiff,
ORDERRELEASINGPROPERTY
vs.
ZACHARYBARKERCOUGHLm,
Defendant.
----------------------,
ITI ORDERED that the" ashoeCountySheriffsOfficeshallreleaseto the
Defendant,ZACHARYBARKERCOUGHLm,threeitemstaken from him on February27,
2012 atthe ashoeCountyRegional DetentionFacility,duringhisbookingfor incarceration
pursuanttoimpo itionof a5-dayjailsentencefor ContemptofCourtin theabove-entitled
case,to wit: one amsungCell Phone;oneT-MobileCell Phone;and oneBraunElectric
Razor, as identified in Case umberWC 12-1805 and referred to underControl#C-47951.
Dated this 29
th
dayof March,2012.

RenoMunicipal Judge