Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a
n
e
|
A
412
ane| A
SCClAL lMLLMLn1A1lCn Cl
8C8C1lCS ln !AAn Anu l1S
L1PlCAL lMLlCA1lCn
Chalr: PCnuA ko[lro
a
n
e
|
A
413
>.($%*'$<:*"<"/+%+$./'.0',.4.+$(1'$/'k%:%/'%/#'$+1'"+2$(%*'$<:*$(%+$./'
ln Lhe 2003 World LxposlLlon, Alchl, !apan, Lhey were very surprlsed when Lhey saw so many roboLs
ln !apan booLh. 1he roboLs had human-llke faces and Lhey walked, Lalked, and even smlled. 8ecause
of culLural background of some sorL, research and developmenL of humanold has become prevalenL
ln !apan. Applylng Lechnlcs of lndusLrlal roboL Lo humanold, Lhe developmenL moves ahead aL a fasL
pace now.
Cn !anuary 21sL of 2013, "8oboL SulL PAL" (Pybrld AsslsLlve Llmb), whlch ls a cyborg-Lype roboL
developed by rof. Sankal and hls group (1sukuba unlverslLy), and LesLed by rof. naka[lma and hls
group (nllgaLa naLlonal PosplLal), was approved as a medlcal devlce, and goL llcense of lSC13483.
lrulLs of Lhls research wlll be lmplemenLed lnLo !apanese socleLy any Llme now.
ln such a slLuaLlon, !apanese phllosophers and eLhlclsLs of Lhe younger generaLlon begln Lo
communlcaLe wlLh roboLlc englneers. lL ls necessary for us Lo predlcL eLhlcal lssues whlch wlll be
provoked by lnLroducLlon of roboL Lechnology Lo Lhe socleLy. Clvll socleLy has Lo dellberaLe wheLher
Lhey accepL Lhe new Lechnology, or noL. And for Lhe dellberaLlon, we should know eLhlcal polnL of
vlew abouL Lhe consequence of roboLlcs. now we sLarL Lo dlscuss 4 caLegorles of problems as
followlng.
1) 1he problem of roboLs' undersLandlng of people: Lo whaL exLenL should Lhe roboLs undersLand
human belngs Lo be accepLed as soclal acLor, who should keep and supervlse Lhe prlvaLe lnformaLlon
whlch roboLs gaLhered, should we glve roboLs Lhe feellngs of llkes and dlsllkes abouL human conducL
or Lhe ablllLy of [udgmenL beLween rlghL and wrong?
2) 1he problem of human undersLandlng of roboLs: whaL ls Lhe condlLlon for us Lo predlcL roboLs'
conducL, ls lL posslble or noL, Lo make roboLs our peL or companlon, can we LreaL roboLs as a moral
paLlenL, can abuslve LreaLmenL agalnsL roboLs be accepLed?
3) 1he problem of reLhlnklng whaL 'human' ls: whaL alLeraLlon wlll developmenL of humanold glve us
abouL our undersLandlng of ourselves, whaL ls Lhe meanlng Lo become posL-human by uslng roboLlc
Lechnology and 8Ml Lechnology, whaL wlll happen lf Al more lnLellecLual Lhan human belngs
appears?
4) 1he problem of soclal responslblllLy of roboLlcs: 1o whaL exLenL should roboLlcs be applled ln our
socleLy, ls lL necessary for us Lo make a speclal Lype of eLhlcs code for roboLlcs, who should Lake
responslblllLy for Lhe fuLure of roboLlcs (sclenLlsLs, englneers, or consumers?), whaL klnd of
responslblllLy should each soclal acLor Lake?
ln Lhls panel dlscusslon, we wlll lnLroduce Lhe !apanese slLuaLlon abouL roboLlcs, and argue eLhlcal
lmpllcaLlon of lL.
* * *
a
n
e
|
A
414
k%:%/"1"'"/3$/"",$/3'"+2$(1'%/#',.4."+2$(1'
PCnuA ko[lro
kanazawa Medlcal unlverslLy, !apan
nrd21774[nlfLy.com
WhaL fuLure vlslon do Lhe !apanese roboLlclsLs have? 1here ls an academlc roadmap for !apanese
roboLlclsLs, whlch was publlshed ln 2007. lL was made by A8M (Academlc 8oad Map) board aLLended
by members of 3 academlc socleLles ln !apan (1he 8oboLlcs SocleLy of !apan, 1he !apanese SocleLy
for ArLlflclal lnLelllgence, !apan Lrgonomlcs SocleLy). We can see Lhe fuLure vlslon of 2030 concelved
by !apanese roboLlclsLs ln Lhls roadmap.
1he Lechnologles whlch should be obLalned ln Lhe fuLure, Lhey Lhlnk, are as followlng.
! Self-reference, self-evaluaLlon, self-resLoraLlon sysLem: uevelopmenL of Lhe roboLs' ablllLy of
MeLa-CognlLlon" Lo undersLand Lhelr own sLaLe and cognlLlve conLenLs, Lhen, Lo modlfy Lhelr
own acLlon.
! CognlLlve developmenL sysLem: uevelopmenL of Lhe sysLem whlch can sponLaneously exLend lLs
own cognlLlve faculLy vla lnLeracLlon wlLh ouLwards and oLhers.
! Comprehenslon of human ob[ecLlve and lnLenLlon: uevelopmenL of roboLs' ablllLy Lo undersLand
oLhers' lnLenLlon and ob[ecLlve for maklng a good communlcaLlon wlLh people.
! AuLonomy: uevelopmenL of Lhe roboLs' ablllLy Lo declde Lhelr own acLlon wlLhouL ouLer
command.
! 8Cl (8raln-CompuLer lnLerface)/8Ml (8raln-Machlne lnLerface)/Cyborg: 8eallzaLlon of
comblnaLlon beLween machlne and human belng, whlch could noL only supporL our ablllLy, buL
also exLend lL.
! ArLlflclal body organs: uevelopmenL of human-made body parLs.
! WeL roboLs: uevelopmenL of roboLs made of blologlcal maLerlals.
! CommunlLy-asslsL 8oboLs: uevelopmenL of roboLs whlch can acLlvaLe and malnLaln our
communlLy wlLh comblnlng a member and oLhers who have same commonallLy.
! lnLellecLuallzed Space: uevelopmenL of roboLlzed commodlLles whlch gaLher lnformaLlon abouL
human lnLenLlon and soclal need Lo supporL socleLy.
Are Lhese Lechnologles permlLLed Lo be reallzed lf only Lhey were conflrmed as safe? We can lmaglne
LhaL Lhese Lechnologles wlll provlde us a mulLlple of eLhlcal problems. lor example, wheLher we
should accepL Lhe roboLs as person or noL, ls a compllcaLed problem and lL would noL be only
concerned wlLh Lhe problem of safeLy. 1he englneerlng eLhlcs for roboLlcs should Lake a proacLlve
sLance Lo avold soclal Lurmoll whlch wlll arlse from soclal lmplemenLaLlon of roboLlcs. ln Lhls Lalk, Lhe
currenL slLuaLlon of roboeLhlcs ln !apan and a range of predlcLable problems wlll be dlscussed.
a
n
e
|
A
41S
* * *
9.8'<.,%*'$1'$+'+.'*"+',.4.+1'%(+'<.,%**BX'
kukl1A Mlnao
Csaka unlverslLy, !apan
Some researchers have proposed Lo creaLe arLlflclal auLonomous sysLems whlch can make moral
declslons or acL morally, wlLh a vlew Lo elLher reduclng Lhe posslblllLy of fuLure dlsasLers or
dlscharglng human workers of some of Lhelr moral burdens. Wallach and Allen (2009) argues ln deLall
for Lhe necesslLy of lmplemenLlng moral funcLlons lnLo machlnes and Lhereby maklng Lhem arLlflclal
moral agenLs, AMAs. Mlchael and Susan Anderson have already launched pro[ecLs Lo make sysLems
whlch wlll Lake over moral Lasks from human workers (cf. Anderson and Anderson, 2007).
AlLhough some people feel sLrongly agalnsL Lhese aLLempLs, ln some slLuaLlons AMAs are useful and
seem noL Lo ralse any serlous concern. Powever, Lhere are oLher slLuaLlons ln whlch we should noL
leL machlnes Lake over a Lask of moral consequence from human agenLs. As an example, we wlll
conslder a concreLe and exLreme case ln whlch uslng roboLs would be of conslderable use buL seems
lnLulLlvely lmmoral: execuLlon of caplLal punlshmenL.
ln !apan, caplLal punlshmenL has noL been abollshed elLher formally or effecLlvely. ln facL, Lhe lasL
decade has seen a slgnlflcanL lncrease ln Lhe number of boLh Lhe deaLh senLences and Lhe
execuLlons. A recenL survey showed LhaL more Lhan 83 percenL of !apanese supporL caplLal
punlshmenL. Meanwhlle, lL ls of course an exLremely unpleasanL [ob Lo execuLe a condemned person.
1hen, why noL employ a roboL Lo do Lhe [ob? lL would noL be especlally hlgh Lech. ueslgned properly,
lL would greaLly lessen Lhe emoLlonal burden of Lhose engaged ln Lhe execuLlon. unllke klller roboLs
ln a baLLle fleld, lL would be unllkely Lo klll mlsLakenly a person whom lL ls noL supposed Lo. So, why
noL?
1he ldea of roboL execuLloner aL leasL goes agalnsL our moral lnLulLlon. 8uL exacLly whaL ls wrong? ln
Lhls Lalk we wlll Lry Lo arLlculaLe reasons agalnsL roboL execuLloners, and Lhereby supporL Lhe clalm
LhaL Lhere are slLuaLlons ln whlch lL ls lmmoral Lo delegaLe roboLs Lo do morally slgnlflcanL Lasks on
behalf of human agenLs. A maln reason ls LhaL moral acLlons should be reclprocal lnLeracLlons. 1he
noLlon of morallLy ls noL rlgld or flxed, buL always flucLuaLlng. We commlL a morally slgnlflcanL acL,
see Lhe ouLcome, and Lhen relnforce or modlfy our prlnclples. ln Lhls lnLeracLlon, psychologlcal
dlsLance makes all Lhe dlfference. Cur sense of morallLy ls dlscounLed by how much psychologlcal
dlfference lles beLween us and Lhem. Allowlng roboLs Lo lnLervene beLween our moral lnLeracLlon
wlll mean greaLer psychologlcal dlsLance, whlch ln Lurn may lead Lo greaLer rlgldlLy of our moral
pracLlce. And we clalm LhaL rlgldlLy ln moral pracLlce ls noL deslrable.
* * *
a
n
e
|
A
416
S<.+$./%*'$/+$<%(B'8$+2'(.<:%/$./',.4.+6'F2%+'$1'%+'1+%="'$/'+2"'#$1()11$./X'
'
ClL Shlnya
kobe unlverslLy, !apan
1hls sLudy ls almed aL conslderlng Lhe experlence of emoLlonal lnLlmacy" beLween companlon
roboLs (roboL companlons) and humans. Companlon roboLs are expecLed Lo play Lhe role of our
companlons such as a frlend (peL), asslsLanL, and servanL (Cf., uauLenhahn eL al., 2003), offerlng
people Lhe feellng of companlonshlp. 1he sLudles for developlng a companlon roboL Lry Lo esLabllsh
and keep Lhe emoLlonal relaLlonshlp ln Puman-8oboL lnLeracLlon (P8l).
now, we can ralse a quesLlon LhaL Lhe emoLlonal relaLlonshlp ln P8l lLself can produce a cerLaln
eLhlcal problem. 1haL ls because we see, on one hand, researchers who acLlvely propose emoLlonal
lnLeracLlon experlences ln P8l, whereas, on Lhe oLher hand, Lhere are researchers who sLaLe LhaL
such experlences wlll harm a cerLaln slgnlflcanL naLure of human belng.
1here are some good examples ln Lhe rapldly developlng fleld of care roboL or Lherapy roboL sLudles.
Along Lhe Lechnologlcal developmenL of uslng roboLs ln elderly care, some researchers say, Lhere wlll
be accompanylng problems. Sharkey and Sharkey (2010) dlsLlngulshes posslble eLhlcal concerns ln
uslng roboLs ln elderly care lnLo slx parLs, among Lhem [1] Lhe poLenLlal reducLlon ln Lhe amounL of
human conLacL" and [2] Lhe decepLlon and lnfanLlllsaLlon" are dlrecLly concerned ln Lhls
presenLaLlon. 1he former dlscusses Lhe posslblllLy LhaL Lhe elderly person wlll be neglecLed by her/hls
famllles or Lhe socleLy because of roboLs' lnLerposlLlon ln human-human soclal communlcaLlon or
because of roboLs' replacemenL of humans. Accordlng Lo Lhe laLLer, decepLlon" refers Lo Lhe harm
caused Lo Lhe elderly's correcL undersLandlng of Lhe world by decelvlng Lhem lnLo Lhlnklng LhaL Lhe
roboL ls someLhlng whlch Lhey could have a relaLlonshlp wlLh, lnfanLlllsaLlon" ls a mallgnanL way of
carlng for demenLla paLlenLs ln whlch a paLlenL ls LreaLed as an lnfanL, especlally by uslng roboL Loys.
ln Lhls presenLaLlon l wlll analyze Lhese Lerms carefully, and ldenLlfy whaL ls aL sLake ln Lhe
poslLlve/negaLlve reacLlons ln sLudles Loward Lhe emoLlonal relaLlonshlp wlLh companlon roboLs. 1hls
sLudy wlll also presenL a hypoLhesls: aL Lhe very rooL of Lhe confllcL of vlews, Lhere ls a cerLaln
LerrlLorlal dlspuLe ln Lhe plane of whaL l call emoLlonal lnLlmacy." 8y Lhls phrase, l mean a form of
seemlngly fundamenLal emoLlonal experlences such as: someLhlng LhaL ls bellevable, a frlend or
parLner, someLhlng you are famlllar wlLh, and a parL of one's exlsLence. 1he emoLlonal lnLlmacy ls
vlewed, expllclLly or LaclLly, as a posslble fundamenLal form of human's llvlng ln and experlenclng Lhe
world. lor some people, Lhls form ls essenLlal Lo llve a llfe as humans, and handlng lL over Lo roboLs
can draw negaLlve reacLlons.
* * *
a
n
e
|
A
417
9.8'12.)*#'8"'4"2%5"'+.8%,#',.4.+1X'I'(%1"'1+)#B'$/'k%:%/"1"'I/$<"
CkAMC1C Shlmpel
Plroshlma unlverslLy, !apan
lL ls lmporLanL for us Lo esLlmaLe how wlll our socleLy change by Lhe appearance of soclal roboLs"
LhaL play varlous roles among an unspeclfled number of people. ConLemporary roboLs can nelLher, of
course, Lhlnk nor feel as well as a person can, nor communlcaLe wlLh us on an equal basls. Powever,
Lhe recenL advances ln roboLlcs belng so remarkable, roboLs can already lnLeracL wlLh us ln some
polnLs. uo we have any moral obllgaLlons Lo Lhem? Moreover, lf roboLs are able Lo communlcaLe
wlLh us perfecLly ln Lhe fuLure, how should we behave Lowards Lhem? Cr, can we regard Lhem as
members of our moral communlLy?
ln conslderlng such lssues, Sclence-llcLlon provldes a good example for eLhlclsLs, because Scl-ll
sLorles descrlbe fuLure socleLles where human belngs llve wlLh roboLs. And forLunaLely, ln Lhe
!apanese Anlme and Manga, Lhere are loLs of examples of rlch lnslghLs abouL such a roboLful-fuLure.
Some scholar holds LhaL !apanese roboLlclsLs who promoLe Lhe developmenLs of Lhe soclal- and
personal-roboLs are under Lhe sLrong lnfluence of Lhe Anlme LhaL descrlbes Lhe roboL as a parLner of
human belngs. lor example, Csamu 1ezuka's AsLro-boy" and lu[lko l. lu[lo's uoraemon" are
Lyplcal works of Lhese Anlme or Manga. Powever, my alm of Lhls sLudy ls nelLher Lhe culLural sLudles
conslderlng how much effecLs have Lhese sub-culLures on !apanese roboLlclsLs, nor Lhe research of
Lhe orlgln or Lhe background of such ldeas on roboLs, LhaL !apanese people have been had. lnsLead,
my purpose ls Lo LreaL Lhe roboLful socleLy descrlbed by Anlme as a model of our socleLy llvlng wlLh
roboLs, for predlcLlng soclal changes of Lhe fuLure. lor Lhls alm, l wlll classlfy Lhe roboLful-fuLure
socleLy lnLo Lhree sorLs by Lhe characLers' aLLlLudes Lowards roboLs ln Lhe Anlme serles. llrsL, Lhe
socleLy where human belngs LreaL roboLs as mere lnsLrumenLs". Second, Lhe socleLy where human
belngs LreaL roboLs as Lhe ouLslders of Lhelr moral communlLy, alLhough roboLs have an lnLellecL
enough for Lhelr communlcaLlon. 1hlrd, Lhe socleLy where human belngs regard roboLs as equal
parLners.
l wlll compare each socleLles and examlne how we should behave Lowards roboLs ln Lhe fuLure.
* * *
a
n
e
|
A
418
;/'82%+'1"/1"',.4.+1'%,"'<.,%**B'(./1$#",%4*"'.4d"(+1'
kAnZAkl nobuLsugu
Shlga unlverslLy, !apan
1he quesLlon LhaL ln whaL sense roboLs are (can/wlll be) moral belngs ls Lhe eLhlcally-mosL-baslc-
quesLlon of roboL eLhlcs. usually Lhls quesLlon ls dlvlded lnLo Lwo parLs: "Can roboLs acL morally?"
and "Are roboLs morally conslderable?" As uavld Cunkel (2012: pp. 94-93) polnLed ouL, phllosophers
someLlmes LreaL Lhese Lwo quesLlons as lf Lhese are vlrLually one, because lf we answer "yes" Lo Lhe
flrsL, Lhen we also geL "yes" for Lhe second. 8uL we can ask Lhese quesLlons separaLely. lor example,
mosL senLlenL anlmals seem noL Lo have capaclLles Lo acL morally, buL are consldered noL Lo be
LreaLed cruelly. 1hls means LhaL developed moral capaclLles (e.g. Lhe capaclLy for moral lnference)
are noL Lhe necessary condlLlon for belng morally consldered. 1herefore noL only Lhe morally-
developed roboLs ln fuLure buL also Lhe presenL roboLs can be morally consldered by us. 1hls ls
conslsLenL wlLh Lhe reporLs on how people LreaL roboLs and reacL Lo lncldenLs occurred Lo Lhem.
1hen, whaL ls Lhe condlLlon for belng morally consldered?
ln Lhls Lalk, l wlll show a LenLaLlve soluLlon Lo Lhe quesLlon: Lhe condlLlon for x's belng morally
consldered ls "Wlll any person cry (or feel sorrow) for x." lL ls a very weak requlremenL because one
person's Lears ls enough. And Lhe reporLs on affecLlve aLLlLudes people someLlmes have Loward
roboLs show LhaL Lhls condlLlon can be and (someLlmes) ls fulfllled. nexL, l wlll glve Lhe reason why
Lhls ls Lhe condlLlon. 1haL ls LhaL when someone feel sorrow for whaL happened Lo x, we are morally
requlred Lo respecL for Lhe person's sorrow. Such respecL ls requlred even when ourselves never
seem x Lo be morally consldered. lor example, l should respecL Lhe sorrow whlch a person feels for a
blologlcal specles' exLlncLlon, even lf l have no lnLeresL ln Lhe conservaLlon of blodlverslLy, or
empaLhy Loward Lhe specles.
l wlll also dlscuss a slgnlflcanL lmpllcaLlon whlch my soluLlon wlll have for Lhe roboLlcs lf lL ls rlghL.
1haL ls Lhe gap beLween Lhe Lask of developlng companlon roboLs or soclal roboLs and LhaL of
developlng morally conslderable roboLs. lf my soluLlon ls rlghL, Lhe recepLlveness of empaLhy from us
or communlcaLlon capaclLles are noL Lhe necessary condlLlon for roboLs' belng morally conslderable.
lf so, lL wlll affecL our vlew on Lhe morallLy and Lhe developmenL of Lhe morallLy of companlon
roboLs and soclal roboLs.
a
n
e
|
8
419
ane| 8
CCvL8nAnCL Anu 1PL
1LCPnCLCClLS Cl lnlC8MA1lCn
Chalr: Luclano lLC8lul
a
n
e
|
8
420
'
i.5",/%/("'%/#'+2"'+"(2/.*.3$"1'.0'$/0.,<%+$./'
Luclano lLC8lul
unlverslLy of PerLfordshlre, uk
luclano.florldl[phllosophy.ox.ac.uk
!ean-Cabrlel CAnASClA
unlverslLy lerre and Marle Curle, lrance
ugo ACALLC
laculLy of Law
unlverslLy of 1urln, lLaly
eLer-aul vL88LLk
ueparLmenL of hllosophy
unlverslLy of 1wenLe, 1he neLherlands
p.p.c.c.verbeek[uLwenLe.nl
leLer vL8MAAS
ueparLmenL of hllosophy
uelf unlverslLy of 1echnology, 1he neLherlands
p.e.vermaas[LudelfL.nl
1he posL-WesLphallan naLlon SLaLe developed by becomlng more and more an lnformaLlon SocleLy.
Powever, ln so dolng, lL progresslvely made lLself less and less Lhe maln lnformaLlon agenL, because
whaL also made Lhe naLlon SLaLe posslble and Lhen predomlnanL, as a hlsLorlcal drlvlng force ln
human pollLlcs , namely lnformaLlon and CommunlcaLlon Lechnologles (lC1s), ls also whaL ls now
maklng lL less cenLral, ln Lhe soclal, pollLlcal and economlc llfe across Lhe world.
lC1s fluldlfy Lhe Lopology of pollLlcs. 1hey do noL merely enable buL acLually promoLe (Lhrough
managemenL and empowermenL) Lhe aglle, Lemporary and Llmely aggregaLlon, dlsaggregaLlon and
re-aggregaLlon of dlsLrlbuLed groups around shared lnLeresLs across old, rlgld boundarles
represenLed by soclal classes, pollLlcal parLles, eLhnlclLy, language barrlers, physlcal barrlers, and so
forLh.
1hls ls generaLlng a new Lenslon beLween Lhe naLlon SLaLe, sLlll undersLood as a ma[or organlsaLlonal
lnsLlLuLlon, yeL no longer monollLhlc buL lncreaslngly morphlng lnLo a mulLlagenL sysLem lLself, and a
varleLy of equally powerful, lndeed someLlmes even more pollLlcally lnfluenLlal and powerful, non-
SLaLal organlsaLlons. Ceo-pollLlcs ls now global and lncreaslngly nonLerrlLorlal, buL Lhe naLlon SLaLe
sLlll deflnes lLs ldenLlLy and pollLlcal leglLlmacy ln Lerms of a soverelgn LerrlLorlal unlL, as a CounLry.
1he panel wlll dlscuss how new lnformaLlonal mulLlagenL sysLems (MAS) be deslgned ln such a way as
Lo Lake full advanLage of Lhe soclo-pollLlcal progress made so far, whlle belng able Lo deal
successfully wlLh Lhe new global challenges (from Lhe envlronmenL Lo Lhe flnanclal markeLs) LhaL are
undermlnlng Lhe legacy of LhaL very progress. lL ls noL an easy Lask. 8uL Lhe hope ls LhaL Lhe panel wlll
a
n
e
|
8
421
conLrlbuLe Lo ldenLlfy soluLlons, resolve problems, and anLlclpaLe dlfflculLles ln Lhls vlLal area of
human lnLeracLlons.
a
n
e
|
C
422
ane| C
1PL CnLllL MAnllLS1C: 8LlnC
PuMAn ln A P?L8CCnnLC1Lu
L8A
Chalr: nlcole uLWAnu8L
a
n
e
|
C
423
D2"'./*$0"'<%/$0"1+.6'K"$/3'2)<%/'$/'%'2B:",(.//"(+"#'",%'
nlcole uLWAnu8L
uC CCnnLC1 aL Luropean Commlsslon, 8elglum
nlcole.dewandre[ec.europa.eul
Luclano lLC8lul
unlverslLy of PerLfordshlre, uk
Charles LSS
ennsylvanla SLaLe unlverslLy, uSA
unlverslLy of Cslo, norway
ugo ACALLC
laculLy of Law
unlverslLy of 1urln, lLaly
!udlLh SlMCn
karlsruhe lnsLlLuLe of 1echnology
unlverslLy of vlenna, AusLrla
[udlLh.slmon[unlvle.ac.aL
^U'H"1(,$:+$./'.0'3"/",%*'+.:$('
1he deploymenL of lnformaLlon and communlcaLlon Lechnologles (lC1s) and Lhelr upLake by socleLy
radlcally affecL Lhe human condlLlon, lnsofar as Lhese phenomena modlfy our relaLlonshlps Lo
ourselves, Lo oLhers and Lo Lhe world ln manlfold ways. 1he ever-lncreaslng pervaslveness of lC1s
challenges esLabllshed concepLual frameworks Lhrough Lhe followlng LransformaLlons:
1. Lhe blurrlng of Lhe dlsLlncLlon beLween reallLy and vlrLuallLy,
2. Lhe blurrlng of Lhe dlsLlncLlons beLween human, machlne and naLure,
3. Lhe reversal from lnformaLlon scarclLy Lo lnformaLlon abundance, and
4. Lhe shlfL from Lhe prlmacy of enLlLles Lo Lhe prlmacy of lnLeracLlons.
1he currenL seL of concepLs and analyLlcal frameworks are Lhus no longer well sulLed Lo address new
lC1-relaLed challenges. ln parLlcular, because we fear and re[ecL whaL we fall Lo make sense of and
glve meanlng Lo, Lhe mlsflLs beLween currenL frameworks and concepLs and our evolvlng
lnformaLlonal reallLles ofLen lead Lo negaLlve pro[ecLlons abouL Lhe fuLure. 1hese mlsflLs and fears
Lhen furLher lmpacL on pollcy-maklng ln unhelpful ways.
ln order Lo acknowledge Lhese lnadequacles and explore alLernaLlve concepLuallsaLlons, Lhe
Luropean Commlsslon has lnvlLed a group of scholars ln anLhropology, cognlLlve sclence, compuLer
sclence, englneerlng, law, neurosclence, phllosophy, pollLlcal sclence, psychology and soclology Lo
a
n
e
|
C
424
[oln Lhe Cnllfe lnlLlaLlve, whlch can be descrlbed as a collecLlve LhoughL exerclse Lo explore Lhe
pollcy-relevanL consequences of Lhese changes.
1he group has drafLed a ManlfesLo LhaL wlll be presenLed Lo Lhe publlc on leb 8
1
.
8eferences
1
hLLps://ec.europa.eu/dlglLal-agenda/en/onllfe-lnlclaLlve
'
TU';11)"1'+.'4"'%##,"11"#'
nlcole uLWAnu8L wlll presenL Lhe ManlfesLo. 1hls ManlfesLo draws Lhree proposals for pollcy-
relevanL concepLual shlfLs: (l) Lo pollLlclze Lhe noLlon of a relaLlonal self, (ll) Lo shlfL from a rlsk-based
approach Lo a llLeracy-based approach and (lll) Lo proLecL and nurLure aLLenLlon capablllLles.
Luclano lLC8lul wlll propose a new undersLandlng of how we are Lransformlng reallLy lnLo an lC1-
frlendly envlronmenL (enveloplng Lhe world) and how Lhls drlves us ouL of hlsLory and lnLo
hyperhlsLory. 1he focus wlll be on Lhe naLure of such LransformaLlon and some of lLs consequences.
Charles LSS wlll focus on Lhe evolvlng noLlon of selfhood ln a hyperconnecLed age Lhrough Lhe lenses
of Medlum Lheory, phenomenology, kanLlan and femlnlsL eLhlcs, and more globally Lhrough
WesLern" and Confuclan vlslons of lC1s, democracy, and equallLy.
!udlLh SlMCn shall explore Lhe dlfflculLy of aLLrlbuLlng responslblllLy and locaLlng accounLablllLy ln
ever-more dlsLrlbuLed and enLangled soclo-Lechnlcal sysLems. She wlll suggesL ways Lo reframe Lhe
concepLs of responslblllLy and accounLablllLy ln a hyperconnecLed era.
ugo ACALLo shall conslder Lhe arLlculaLlon of Lhe lnformaLlon revoluLlon and pollLlcs wlLh Lhe
concepL of governance", polnLlng Lo Lhe facL LhaL ln addlLlon Lo Lhe LradlLlonal hard and sofL law-
Lools of governance, Lhe governance of a complex mulLl-agenL sysLem ln facL lncreaslngly hlnges on
Lhe LechnlcallLles of deslgn mechanlsms.
a
n
e
|
D
42S
ane| D
uLSC8l1lvL lnCul8? Cl
1LCPnCLCC?: CCnl8Cn1lnC
L8SLC1lvLS A8Cu1 lukuSPlMA
Chalr: kAnLMl1Su Pldekazu
a
n
e
|
D
426
ln our Llme, Lechnology produces new Lype of acLlon and brlngs a subsLanLlal change Lo our socleLy.
So, we need crlLlcal polnL of vlew whlch can casL a reflecLlve eye on Lhe sLaLe of Lechnology.
Lspeclally, afLer Lhe lukushlma nuclear AccldenL, Lhere ls a compelllng need for such crlLlcal eye on
Lechnology. ln Lhls panel, we wlll Lry Lo descrlbe Lhe acL of Lechnology, especlally Lhe lukushlma
nuclear AccldenL ln llne wlLh Lhe evenL. 1hls wlll be a premlse of crlLlcal polnL of vlew on Lechnology.
* * *
D2"'1$3/$0$(%/("'.0'#"1(,$:+$5"'$/N)$,B'.0'+"(2/.*.3B
kAnLMl1Su Pldekazu
kanazawa lnsLlLuLe of 1echnology, !apan
kane[nepLune.kanazawa-lL.ac.[p
Pe wlll Lalk abouL lnLenL and purpose of Lhls panel. Pe wlll conflrm Lhe lmporLance of descrlpLlve
lnqulry as Lhe premlse of crlLlcal polnL of vlew on Lechnology.
* * *
I(%#"<$('*$4",+B'%/#'%(%#"<$(',"3)*%+$./6'[)=)12$<%'#$1%1+",'$/5.=$/3'+2"'.*#'%/#'/"8':,.4*"<''
PCnuA ko[lro
kanazawa Medlcal unlverslLy, !apan
nrd21774[nlfLy.com
1he lukushlma dlsasLer revealed an exlsLence of soclal sLrucLure of !apan, where a conglomeraLe of
bureaucracy and blg elecLrlc company domlnaLes small buslnesses and academlc communlLy. 1hey
call lL nuclear vlllage". Where dld Lhe sLrucLure come from? When was lL consLrucLed? WhaL klnd of
LhoughL ls domlnanL ln lL? 1hese quesLlons musL be solved lf !apanese people really wanL Lo make
radlcal Lransparency of rlsk lnformaLlon and rebulld soclal LrusL agalnsL naLlonal lndusLry or 'blg
sclence'. ln Lhls presenLaLlon, skeLchlng Lhe hlsLorlcal background, he wlll argue LhaL Lhe !apanese
regulaLlon pollcy of sclence and Lechnology, whlch was made ln lmlLaLlon of sclence pollcy of nazlfled
Cermany, came Lhrough World War ll. Such an analysls ls necessary Lo crlLlclze !apanese slLuaLlon of
posL-lukushlma era.
* * *
a
n
e
|
D
427
;/+",/%*'*.3$('.0'.,3%/$R%+$./1'%/#'+2"'[)=)12$<%'/)(*"%,'%(($#"/+
nACL klyoLaka
1ohoku unlverslLy, !apan
1wo years have passed slnce Lhe lukushlma nuclear AccldenL Look place. SLlll 160 Lhousand people
are obllged Lo leave Lhelr land and famlly. 1he causes and Lhe backgrounds of Lhe accldenL are sLlll
noL fully known.
errow polnLed ouL LhaL Lhe 1Ml was a Lyplcal example of a normal accldenL ln Plgh-8lsk sysLems
resulLlng from an unanLlclpaLed lnLeracLlon of mulLlple fallures ln a complex sysLem. ln Lhe
lukushlma accldenL we can also polnL ouL Lhe role of "lnLernal loglc" or "sense-maklng" ln
(governmenLal, lndusLrlal, academlc eLc.) organlzaLlons and ln our socleLy. Many warnlngs for Lhe
posslblllLles of some serlous accldenLs are made before Lhe accldenL. 8uL Lhere ls no denylng LhaL
such warnlngs were lneffecLlve: Lhey dld noLhlng (or posLponed Lhelr declslons) Lo prevenL ma[or
dlsasLers LhaL we know, from a rellable sclenLlflc source, wlll Lake place. lL ls raLher by evoklng Lhe
lnevlLablllLy of dlsasLers, LhaL ls, by referrlng preclsely Lo whaL glves Lhem Lhelr dlsasLer dlmenslon,
LhaL we were able Lo avold Lhem.
ln Lhls presenLaLlon, he wlll make an analysls of Lhese eplsLemlc slLuaLlons, whlch shows essenLlal
llmlLaLlons ln Lhe LradlLlonal modes of deallng wlLh uncerLalnLy. Pe wlll argue LhaL Lhese Lyplcal
cognlLlve barrlers lead Lo Lhe paralysls of acLlon.
* * *
G"1:./1$4*"'/)(*"%,'"/",3B'+"(2/.*.3B'#"5"*.:<"/+'?'F2%+'%,"'8"'"@:",$<"/+$/3'8$+2X'
!an eLer 8L8CLn
ueparLmenL of values and 1echnology
uelfL unlverslLy of 1echnology, 1he neLherlands
[.bergen[LudelfL.nl
1he accldenL aL Lhe lukushlma uallchl nuclear power planL ln March, 2011 has sparked renewed
crlLlcal aLLenLlon for nuclear power and how Lo deal wlLh Lhe rlsks Lhereof (e.g. Pale, 2011).
Accordlng Lo van de oel (2011), a dlscusslon of Lhe moral accepLablllLy of nuclear energy Lechnology
(nL1) and lLs rlsks ls acLually slgnlflcanLly more dlfflculL Lhan ofLen LhoughL due Lo Lhe llmlLed
predlcLablllLy of Lhe acLual rlsks connecLed Lo nL1 once Lhey are acLually employed ln socleLy.
uncerLalnLy and lgnorance abouL posslble rlsks are lnherenL Lo Lechnologlcal developmenL, boLh for
power generaLlon and for nuclear wasLe. van de oel Lherefore proposes LhaL we recognlze Lhe
experlmenLal naLure of such Lechnologles and Lhelr lmplemenLaLlon ln socleLy from Lhe very sLarL. ln
dolng so, Lhe cenLral quesLlon ls no longer .wheLher nuclear energy Lechnology as such ls
accepLable, [buL] abouL Lhe condlLlons under whlch experlmenLs wlLh nuclear energy Lechnology are
or mlghL be accepLable" (p. 288). ln oLher words, a dlscusslon of Lhe moral accepLablllLy of nL1
a
n
e
|
D
428
should Lranscend a dlscusslon focussed prlmarlly on rlsk Lowards a dlscusslon on Lhe seL-up of a
responslble soclal experlmenL wlLh nL1.
Powever, lL ls quesLlonable wheLher such an experlmenL and Lhe responslblllLy condlLlons under
whlch lL should be performed can be fully appreclaLed lf Lhe concepLuallsaLlon of Lechnology
underlylng Lhe dlscusslon ls noL sufflclenLly lncluslve. ln oLher words, whaL are we experlmenLlng
wlLh? Lspeclally ln Lhe early phases of Lechnology developmenL and appllcaLlon, more ls golng on
Lhan slmply Lhe deslgn of maLerlal arLefacLs. lndeed, as one experlmenLs wlLh maLerlal arrangemenLs,
lnsLlLuLlonal and dlscurslve experlmenLs are also performed. Cn an lnsLlLuLlonal level, sLandards of
pracLlce, measures of success, organlsaLlonal arrangemenLs, eLc. are belng formallzed. Cn a
dlscurslve level, a speclflc language ls developed and symbollc llnkages are esLabllshed. Such
lnsLlLuLlonal and dlscurslve experlmenLaLlon has profound affecLs on Lhe developmenL of a
Lechnology. ln llghL of Lhls, l propose a concepLuallsaLlon of Lechnology LhaL ls able Lo Lake accounL of
Lhese mulLl-levelled, experlmenLal processes of Lechnology developmenL: tecbooloqy os tbe
sttoctototloo of bomoo ospltotloos. 8ulldlng on Lhe dynamlc ln Lhe duallLy of sLrucLure ln
sLrucLuraLlon Lheory (Clddens, 1984), augmenLed wlLh lnslghLs from Lhe soclology of expecLaLlons
(e.g., 8orup eL al., 2006) Lhls paper presenLs Lechnology as a resulL and, ln Lurn, medlaLor of
processes of soclal sLrucLurlng of human hopes and amblLlons lnLo Lhe llfeworld. Such sLrucLuraLlon
Lakes place on aL leasL Lhe abovemenLloned Lhree levels (Lhe maLerlal, Lhe lnsLlLuLlonal and Lhe
dlscurslve levels), whlch are lnexLrlcably lnLerdependenL.
1o show how Lhls broad concepLuallzaLlon of Lechnology can be of added value ln analyzlng Lhe
responslblllLy of soclal experlmenLs wlLh nL1, a hlsLorlcal analysls ls presenLed of Lhe developmenL of
Lhe lndlan nuclear energy program beLween Lhe 1940's and Lhe 1980's. lL ls based on Lhe Lhree levels
of Lechnology as presenLed above (maLerlal, lnsLlLuLlonal and dlscurslve). Lach level ls dlscussed and
llnked Lo boLh oLhers, as Lhe mosL baslc asplraLlons LhaL lay aL Lhe basls of Lhe program (naLlonal
prlde, lndependence and developmenL) are woven lnLo all Lhree levels of Lechnology. 1hey were
embedded ln concreLe sLrucLures LhaL gulde agency and can glve Lhe asplraLlons a slgnlflcanL degree
of normalcy. nexL Lo Lhls, Lhe program shows a number of 'self-proLecLlve' feaLures LhaL could help lL
survlve opposlLlon. 1he resulLs of Lhls descrlpLlve analysls are subsequenLly mlrrored Lo one of van de
oel's proposed condlLlons for morally responslble experlmenLaLlon: Lhe posslblllLy of sLopplng Lhe
experlmenL or, ln oLher words, avoldlng lrreverslblllLy. lL ls found LhaL lrreverslblllLles goL sLrucLured
lnLo lndlan nL1 on all Lhree levels, and LhaL Lhese sLrucLural feaLures LhaL cause lrreverslblllLy ln Lhe
lndlan experlmenL wlLh nL1 relnforce one anoLher across Lhe levels.
1hese resulLs supporL Lhe ldea LhaL experlmenLaLlon wlLh Lechnology lnvolves experlmenLlng noL only
wlLh maLerlal buL also lnsLlLuLlonal and dlscurslve sLrucLures. As such, Lhlnklng of Lechnology as Lhe
sLrucLuraLlon of human asplraLlons could serlously conLrlbuLe Lo Lhe analysls and posslbly Lhe deslgn
of morally responslble soclal experlmenLaLlon wlLh nL1.
a
n
e
|
D
429
8eferences
8orup, M., 8rown, n., konrad, k., and van LenLe P. 2006. 1he Soclology of LxpecLaLlons ln Sclence
and 1echnology." 1echnology Analysls SLraLeglc ManagemenL 18 (3-4): 283-298.
Clddens, A. 1984. 1he ConsLlLuLlon of SocleLy: CuLllne of Lhe 1heory of SLrucLuraLlon. 8erkeley, CA:
unlverslLy of Callfornla ress.
Pale, 8. 2011. lukushlma uallchl, normal AccldenLs, and Moral 8esponslblllLy: LLhlcal CuesLlons
AbouL nuclear Lnergy." LLhlcs, ollcy and LnvlronmenL 14 (3): 263-263.
van de oel, l. 2011. nuclear Lnergy as a Soclal LxperlmenL." LLhlcs, ollcy & LnvlronmenL 14 (3):
283-290.
* * *
9.8'+.'$<:,.5"'(.<<)/$(%+$./'%4.)+'/)(*"%,'%(($#"/+1'
Cellne kL8MlSCP
CenLre de 8echerches lnLerdlsclpllnalres en 8loeLhlque (C173/01)
unlverslLe Llbre de 8ruxelles, 8elglum
ckermlsc[ulb.ac.be
lerre-LLlenne LA8LAu
unlverslLe Llbre de 8ruxelles, 8elglum
lL ls nowadays wldely acknowledged LhaL communlcaLlon ls a crlLlcal parL of rlsk and accldenL
managemenL. A clear and prompL communlcaLlon ls even more cruclal for Lechnologles poLenLlally
leadlng Lo caLasLrophlc damage such as nuclear power. ln Lhls fleld, several communlcaLlon Lools
have been deslgned, such as Lhe lncldenL 8eporLlng SysLem (l8S), Lhe luel lncldenL noLlflcaLlon and
Analysls SysLem (llnAS), Lhe lncldenL 8eporLlng SysLem for 8esearch 8eacLors (l8S88), and Lhe
lnLernaLlonal nuclear and 8adlologlcal LvenL Scale (lnLS). 1he laLLer ls a Lool speclflcally concelved Lo
faclllLaLe a prompL communlcaLlon wlLh Lhe medla and Lhe publlc ln case of nuclear evenLs. lnLS
provldes a seL of crlLerla, whlch allows Lo classlfy Lhese evenLs from 1 Lo 7 accordlng Lo Lhelr severlLy
- 1 belng an anomaly" and 7 belng a ma[or accldenL". Powever, Lhe recenL lukushlma dlsasLer
showed LhaL Lhls scale ralses several lssues and ls noL a sLralghLforward Lool.
1he alm of Lhls paper ls Lo proceed Lo a crlLlcal analysls of lnLS and lLs use, boLh from an eplsLemlc
and from an eLhlcal/pollLlcal perspecLlve, ln order Lo provlde suggesLlons whlch should conLrlbuLe Lo
lmprove Lhls Lool and, more generally, communlcaLlon abouL nuclear evenLs. As very few papers
have been dedlcaLed Lo Lhls sub[ecL, our research ls malnly based on Lhe lnLS 2009 user's Manual
(lALA, 2009), and on Lechnlcal lnformaLlon lssued by assoclaLlons such as Creenpeace (Plrsch, 2011)
and by nuclear agencles such as Lhe lnLernaLlonal ALomlc Lnergy Agency or Lhe !apanese nuclear and
a
n
e
|
D
430
lndusLrlal SafeLy Agency (lALA, 2011, nlSA, 2011, Nl5A/M1l, 2011).
1hree maln eplsLemlc lssues assoclaLed wlLh Lhe deslgn of Lhe scale can be hlghllghLed. llrsL, we
show LhaL several dlfferenL crlLerla may lead Lo asslgn Lhe same lnLS raLlng, whlch can cause an
lnsufflclenL dlfferenLlaLlon beLween evenLs. ln order Lo avold Lhls lssue, we suggesL Lo speclfy Lhe
crlLerla used Lo assess Lhe level of Lhe evenL (1). 1hen, we argue LhaL Lhe level 7 of lnLS ls lll-deflned
as lL does noL allow Lo properly Lake lnLo accounL severlLy dlfferences beLween dlsasLers. ln Lhls
regard, we recommend Lo use an open scale lnsLead (2). AfLerwards, we hlghllghL Lhe facL LhaL lnLS ls
unable Lo adequaLely Lake lnLo accounL evenLs wlLh long-Lerm evoluLlon or lnvolvlng mulLlple
lnlLlaLors. We suggesL Lo provlde addlLlonal guldellnes ln Lhls respecL (3). lrom an eLhlcal and pollLlcal
perspecLlve, Lwo lmporLanL lssues llnked Lo Lhe use of lnLS can be emphaslzed. llrsL, confuslon and
LrusL lssues are suscepLlble Lo arlse whenever Lhe publlc ls faclng dlsparlLles beLween lnLS raLlngs.
1hls leads Lo ask who should be raLlng a nuclear evenL. ln Lhls regard, we recommend LhaL, for severe
evenLs, an lndependenL and plural agency should be ln charge (4). Secondly, as lnLS only glves
lnformaLlon abouL an evenL aL a speclflc Llme, updaLes of raLlngs are requlred for evolvlng accldenLs
such as lukushlma. 1hese updaLes may also cause confuslon and LrusL lssues. ln Lhls respecL, we
suggesL Lo glve oLher lnformaLlon ln parallel, ln order Lo provlde an assessmenL of Lhe rlsks aL sLake
and of Lhe posslble evoluLlon of Lhe slLuaLlon (3). 1hese flve suggesLlons should conLrlbuLe Lo Lhe
lmprovemenL of lnLS and Lhereby Lo a beLLer communlcaLlon abouL nuclear evenLs.
8eferences
Plrsch (2011) Plrsch P, lokosblmo - loes scole totloq (2J/0J/11), 2011,
hLLp://www.greenpeace.org/lnLernaLlonal/en/publlcaLlons/reporLs/lukushlma--lnLS-scale-raLlng/
lALA (2009) lAA, lN5. 1be lotetootloool Nocleot ooJ toJloloqlcol veot 5cole. usets mooool, 2009,
hLLp://www-pub.laea.org/mLcd/publlcaLlons/ubueLalls.asp?publd=8120
lALA (2011) lALA, lAA 8tlefloq oo lokosblmo Nocleot AcclJeot (12 Aptll 2011, 14.J0 u1c), 2011,
hLLp://www.laea.org/newscenLer/news/2011/fukushlma120411.hLml
nlSA (2011) nlSA, kepott of Iopooese Covetomeot to tbe lAA Mlolstetlol coofeteoce oo Nocleot
5ofety. 1be AcclJeot ot 1lcO's lokosblmo Nocleot lowet 5totloos, 2011,
hLLp://www.nlsa.meLl.go.[p/engllsh/
Nl5A/M1l (2011) Nl5A/M1l, lN5 kotloq oo tbe veots lo lokosblmo uol-lcbl Nocleot lowet 5totloo
by tbe 1oboko ulsttlct - off tbe loclflc Oceoo ottbpooke, 2011,
hLLp://www.nlsa.meLl.go.[p/engllsh/flles/en20110412-4.pdf
* * *
a
n
e
|
D
431
[)=)12$<%'$/',"#: Unpred|ctab|||ty and nuc|ear threat
!ose Luls CA8ClA
lnsLlLuLe of Soclal Sclences
unlverslLy of Llsbon (lCS-uL), orLugal
[lgarcla[lcs.ul.pL
Pelena MaLeus !L8CnlMC
School of Lconomlcs and ManagemenL
1echnlcal unlverslLy of Llsbon (lSLC-u1L) & SCCluS, orLugal
[eronlmo[lseg.uLl.pL
1he accldenL ln Lhe lukushlma nuclear power planL whlch sLruck !apan early 2011 ls llke someLhlng
ouL of MounL lu[l ln 8ed," one of Lhe elghL fragmenLs ln Lhe 1990 fllm uteoms by Lhe brllllanL
!apanese fllm-maker Aklra kurosawa. 1he secLlon aL lssue lmaglnes Lhe exploslon of a nuclear power
planL LhaL lnlLlaLes an erupLlon of MounL lu[l, one of Lhe naLlonal symbols of !apan. lL beglns wlLh
lmages of exploslons on Lhe mounLaln, followed by chaos and panlc and people seek Lo flee. 1he
flery, aggresslve colors of Lhe sky show how vlolenL Lhe exploslons have been. lL subsequenLly
emerges LhaL slx reacLors ln a nuclear power planL have been explodlng one afLer Lhe oLher. ln
MounL lu[l ln 8ed" Lhere ls an lmpllclL quesLlonlng of Lhe overconfldenL bellef LhaL lL ls posslble Lo
domesLlcaLe" uncerLalnLy and chance and achleve domlnlon over naLure - a bellef whlch serves as
Lhe foundaLlon of aLLempLs Lo esLabllsh a Lechnologlcal order. 1hls fragmenL shows Lhe resulL of a
cerLaln arrogance, whlch devalues uncerLalnLy and belleves LhaL lL has forever removed Lhe rlsk of
Lragedy, buL only provldes a basls for Lhelr re-emergence ln oLher horrlflc forms.
1he denlal of uncerLalnLy and unpredlcLablllLy enables Lhe currenL noLlon of rlsk Lo prevall when
welghlng up Lhe posslblllLles of Lechnologlcal accldenLs and dlsasLers. 1he language of rlsk, wlLh lLs
scenarlos of advanLages and dlsadvanLages!" #$%" &'#()*'&'$+" +,*-).," /*-0#0121+3" #(('((&'$+(!"
!"#$%!&'()"*+%,"+$&%#&$+&-+,(./$+0(1$"!/2#1#%3+2(%+4#%,+/+*(55!"**#&$+&-+($)"!%/#$%36+7,"+*3*%"./%#)+
!"#$ %&$ "'(')"')*(+$ &%,#*("'"$ *(-$ .#$ "##-$ ("$ ($ ,#"/%-"#$ '%$ '0#$ 1%2#,-$ 3!#"'$ &%,$ *#,'()-'45$ )-"%&(,$ !"#
!"#$%!"#&'() "*+) (#"#&(#&'() $",%) -%'.!%) #/"+%!"/0() .1) #/2%) 0*.34%+5%) &*) "4!.(#) %,%/6) "/%".
lorecasLs always lnclude sLaLlsLlcal probablllLles, lf noL, Lhey are devalued, regarded as useless
speculaLlve exerclses. 8uL a sLaLlsLlcal relaLlonshlp ls only valld ln a closed sysLem, and Lhen only Lo
Lhe exLenL LhaL lL would be posslble Lo lgnore all facLors LhaL cannoL be expressed ln maLhemaLlcal
Lerms. ln a world of soclal lnLeracLlon, however, lL ls lmposslble Lo remove or deny unknown,
random, or radlcally uncerLaln facLors LhaL ls, unpredlcLable evenLs LhaL can arlse from complexlLy
or freedom. 1he llLeraLure on Lechnologlcal accldenLs shows LhaL, wheLher Lhey are prlmarlly
aLLrlbuLable Lo naLural causes, Lechnologlcal breakdowns, or human error, Lhey always derlve from
mulLlple facLors, noL all of whlch have been preclsely ldenLlfled. roblems, dangers, and fallures are
aL Lhelr mosL lnLerdependenL ln crlLlcal slLuaLlons. 1hls does noL mean underesLlmaLlng Lhe value of
sLaLlsLlcal forecasLs or lgnorlng Lhe experLs who make Lhem. 8uL lL ls one Lhlng Lo see sLaLlsLlcal
forecasLs as necessary, qulLe anoLher Lhlng Lo see Lhem as belng pracLlcally lnfalllble.
a
n
e
|
D
432
1he lukushlma dlsasLer demonsLraLed LhaL ln conLemporary socleLles, vulnerablllLles and LhreaLs are
dlfflculL Lo locaLe or predlcL, belng boLh lncalculable and lmposslble Lo offseL!"#$%$&'()*"+,-+./$0,&"
!"# $# %$&'(# )*$%(# $# )+&!"'# +&(",# -"# ,-)$)+(&)# -"# +.(# +(*."!-!"#"$!"$%& '()*"%*"'& (+& %(!,-.& $,%/0,1&
!"#$#%&'#( %&)!( %*( +$,&( -$.$/"%*0#( -*)#&10&)-&#( 2"%+( !"33&'!"#$ %!&!%'$ ()$ *+,-"$ ."#!/-0#.("1$ !"#$
!"#$%"&' #($!")*' #+"#' %","-./' 0"1"!' 2"(' "&(3' "' #.4+!3&3-*4"&' #($!")*' 2*#+' .43&3-*4"&5' (34*"&5'
!"#$#%&"'( )$*( +#,&-&"),( "#$.!/0!$"!.1! !"#$ %&'&(")*+$ ,)(+(-#.$ *+/$ 0#$ -"1&2"-$ 13$ 41-$ 5&(-$ +($ +$
!"#$#%&'()*'(+$,$-.(/0%()*'(%1&(%&21-*3*4"2$3(*'!&'5(
Cur analysls of Lhe March 11
Lh
dlsasLer beglns wlLh a slmple narraLlve showlng how a naLural dlsasLer
ln a counLry aL Lhe forefronL of Lechnologlcal developmenL preclplLaLed an accldenL ln a nuclear
power planL LhaL ln Lurn led Lo a chaln of calamlLles aL mulLlple levels. Pow dld we become
consLrucLors of a world wlLh such caLasLrophlc poLenLlal? Pow ls lL posslble Lo conLlnue Lo lnslsL on
Lhls form of energy? SecLlon Lwo responds by conslderlng how Lhe nuclear LhreaL ls played down as a
resulL of Lhe euphorlc noLlon LhaL human vulnerablllLy can gradually be overcome by Lhe lncreaslng
ablllLy of sclence, Lechnology and probablllLy analysls Lo conLrol and predlcL evenLs. 1he flnal secLlon
reLrleves Lhe ldea of foreslghLedness" as Lhe basls of a pollLlcal and soclal approach LhaL can Lake on
noL only Lhe uncerLalnLles of Lhe world, buL also Lhose generaLed by Lechnlcal sysLems, ln order Lo
lllumlnaLe our cholces and declslons. When faced wlLh calamlLles and damages LhaL appear Lo arlse
ouL of Lhe blue buL are, ln Lhe flnal analysls, Lhe ouLcomes of our Lechnologlcal sysLems, Lhelr
lnLeracLlons, and our dependencles, foreslghLedness emerges as a response boLh raLlonal and
vlrLuous, however dlfflculL.
a
n
e
|
L
433
ane| L
LAnCuACL Anu 1LCPnCLCC?
Chalr: hlllp nlCkLL
a
n
e
|
L
434
L.<:)+",'(./+,%(+1'%,+$0$($%*'1:""(2''
hlllp !. nlCkLL
School of lnnovaLlon Sclences
Llndhoven unlverslLy of 1echnology, 1he neLherlands
p.[.nlckel[Lue.nl
'
8ecenL work ln legal Lheory has Laken up Lhe lssue of conLracLs made by compuLers (8ellla 2001,
SarLor 2009). ln general, Lhls work Lakes a soclal consLrucLlvlsL approach Lo Lhe quesLlon of wheLher
compuLers have Lhe soclal and normaLlve sLandlng Lo engage ln Lhe acL of conLracL-maklng. Pere, l
deflne soclal consLrucLlvlsm as Lhe vlew LhaL someLhlng has soclal and normaLlve sLandlng [usL ln case
people convenLlonally aLLrlbuLe soclal and normaLlve sLandlng or Lhe characLerlsLlcs LhaL underlle
LhaL sLandlng.
1wo maln argumenLs are used Lo supporL Lhls vlew. 1he flrsL ls LhaL Lhe behavlor of conLracLlng
compuLers can be besL undersLood by adopLlng Lhe lnLenLlonal sLance (SarLor 2009, adapLlng an ldea
from uenneLL 1989). 1he second ls LhaL such conLracLs are a wldely-accepLed pracLlce generally
accepLed by Lhe law.
8oLh argumenLs beg Lhe quesLlon agalnsL skepLlcs who flnd we should resLrlcL agenLlal sLaLus Lo real
and arLlflclal (legal) persons such as adulL humans and corporaLlons. lor, flrsL of all, Lhe lnLenLlonal
sLance can usefully be adopLed Loward enLlLles of whlch we know LhaL Lhey do noL have genulne
lnLenLlonal sLaLes, for example slngle-celled organlsms and lnsLlLuLlons. Secondly, Lhe sLaLus of a
legal person as Lhls ls soclally consLrucLed (Searle 1993, Marmor 2009) ls clearly dlsLlncL from Lhe
sLaLus of havlng genulne lnLenLlonal sLaLes. CorporaLlons have legal personhood buL no genulne
lnLenLlonal sLaLes. And Lhlrdly, Lhe facL LhaL conLracLs are ofLen made by compuLers ln pracLlce can
be explalned ln oLher ways Lhan by aLLrlbuLlng normaLlve sLaLus Lo Lhe arLlflclal agenLs LhaL arrange
Lhem, as l wlll go on Lo explaln. lor Lhese reasons, Lhose skepLlcal of Lhe leglLlmacy of arLlflclal
conLracLs are unllkely Lo be persuaded by Lhese argumenLs.
ln Lhls paper l ouLllne an alLernaLlve approach more llkely Lo wlLhsLand skepLlclsm abouL Lhe agenLlal
capaclLy of compuLers. l place compuLer conLracLs ln Lhe broader caLegory of speech acLs carrled ouL
by compuLers. naLural language generaLlon (nLC) Lechnologles enable compuLers Lo creaLe
somewhaL orlglnal messages and dellver Lhem ln conLexL as speech acLs (Searle 1969). Such speech
acLs lnclude promlses, asserLlons and LhreaLs, all of whlch have eLhlcal and legal dlmenslons. l puL
forward Lhe Lhesls LhaL compuLers need noL have full soclal and normaLlve sLandlng, nor genulne
lnLenLlonal sLaLes, ln order Lo carry ouL speech acLs on behalf of Lhose who do have full sLandlng. l
call Lhese proxy speech acLs. Cn Lhls alLernaLlve vlew, we do noL need Lo granL full soclal and
normaLlve sLandlng Lo compuLers ln order for Lhem Lo carry ouL somewhaL lndependenL proxy
speech acLs on behalf of oLhers (lncludlng arLlflclal legal persons such as corporaLlons).
l conclude by showlng LhaL we need noL resolve Lhe lssue wheLher compuLers LhaL make conLracLs
have cognlLlve sLaLes or lnLenLlonallLy ln order Lo accounL fully for Lhe normaLlve sLaLuses creaLed by
such conLracLs. locuslng on Lhe speech acLs of asserLlon and promlslng, l conslder how norms for Lhe
a
n
e
|
L
43S
funcLlonlng of arLlflclal speakers (whlch l call speech acLanLs) make lL posslble for Lhem Lo lle,
decelve, and make false promlses. l explaln how laws and lnsLlLuLlonal norms can relnforce Lhls
posslblllLy.
8eferences
8ellla, A.!. 2001. ConLracLlng wlLh elecLronlc agenLs. Lmory Law !ournal 30: 1047-1092.
uenneLL, u.C. 1989. 1he lnLenLlonal sLance. Cambrldge, MA: Ml1 ress.
Marmor, A. 2009. Soclal convenLlons: from language Lo law. rlnceLon, n!: rlnceLon unlverslLy
ress.
SarLor, C. 2009. CognlLlve auLomaLa and Lhe law: elecLronlc conLracLlng and Lhe lnLenLlonallLy of
sofLware agenLs. ArLlflclal lnLelllgence and Lhe Law 17: 233-290.
Searle, !.8. 1969. Speech acLs. new ?ork: Cambrldge unlverslLy ress.
-. 1993. 1he consLrucLlon of soclal reallLy. London: Allen Lane.
* * *
I,+$0$($%*'1:""(2'%(+1'
AnLhonle W. M. MLl!L8S
School of lnnovaLlon Sclences
Llndhoven unlverslLy of 1echnology, 1he neLherlands
a.w.m.mel[ers[Lue.nl
CompuLers lncreaslngly speak Lo us. 1hls ls parL of a fundamenLal change ln Lhe lnLeracLlon beLween
human belngs and Lechnologlcal arLefacLs. lL ls becomlng 'naLural', l.e., analogous Lo Lhe lnLeracLlon
beLween humans. hyslcal buLLons, vlsual represenLaLlons, mouse cllcks, or keyboard lnpuLs are
belng replaced by communlcaLlon and conLrol vla naLural language (elLher wrlLLen or spoken). ln
addlLlon, Lhese arLefacLs wlll be more and more lnLelllgenL and self-conLrolled, and wlll be able Lo
adapL Lo new slLuaLlons wlLhouL Lhe need Lo be reprogrammed. 1hey wlll also be able Lo generaLe
conLexL-senslLlve uLLerances more or less auLonomously, l.e., wlLhouL lnLervenLlon by human belngs.
LlngulsLlc uLLerances generaLed by arLefacLs could be slmllar Lo ordlnary speech acLs. lmage a devlce
LhaL ls used Lo manage flnanclal LransacLlons and whlch has a llngulsLlc lnLerface. lL could generaLe
senLences LhaL predlcL LhaL Lhe sLock exchange wlll go up, LhaL advlse Lo sell sLocks, LhaL warn for
cerLaln rlsks, LhaL promlse Lo collecL lnformaLlon, or even LhaL apologlze for a connecLlon fallure.
Pow should we undersLand Lhls? 1he paper addresses Lhe quesLlon Lo whaL exLenL Lhese so-called
arLlflclal speech acLs can be analysed ln Lerms of Searle's Lheory of speech acLs ((Searle 1969), (Searle
a
n
e
|
L
436
1983), (1sohaLzldls 2007)). undersLandlng arLlflclal speech acLs ls lmporLanL glven LhaL Lhey wlll
become an lnLegral parL of our Lechnologlcal world.
1he concepLual framework of speech acL Lheory conslsLs of several elemenLs: speech acLs are
analysed ln Lerms of Lhelr lllocuLlonary polnL (Lhe purpose a speaker has ln mlnd wlLh uLLerlng a
senLence), Lhelr dlrecLlon of flL, Lhelr expressed psychologlcal sLaLe and a number of condlLlons for
successfully performlng Lhem (lncludlng normal communlcaLlon condlLlons and an approprlaLe
lnsLlLuLlonal and soclal conLexL).
ln my paper l wlll dlsLlngulsh Lwo dlfferenL Lypes of cases: (l) cases ln whlch Lechnologlcal arLefacLs
generaLe prefabrlcaLed senLences LhaL are used ln well-deflned conLexLs (for example a hoLel room
booklng sysLem wlLh closed quesLlons), and (ll) cases ln whlch arLefacLs are able Lo generaLe more or
less auLonomously conLexL-senslLlve senLences. l wlll argue LhaL Lhe flrsL Lype of cases can be under-
sLood ln Lerms of Searle's speech acL Lheory, uslng noLlons such as derlved lnLenLlonallLy (lnLenLlo-
nallLy LhaL ls lmposed by agenLs on non-lnLenLlonal phenomena) and delegaLlon (acLlng on behalf).
1hls ls ln llne wlLh Lhe so-called dual naLure Lheory of Lechnlcal arLefacLs (kroes and Mel[ers 2006).
1he second Lype of cases, however, ls much harder. ALLrlbuLlng purposes, a flrsL-person perspecLlve,
psychologlcal sLaLes and undersLandlng Lo arLefacLs ls a conLroverslal lssue. lL Lranscends Lhe conLexL
of arLlflclal speech acLs and belongs Lo Lhe domaln of arLlflclal lnLelllgence. lL wlll noL be solved easlly.
WhaL l propose ln my paper ls a pragmaLlc approach slnce lssues concernlng arLlflclal speech acLs are
knocklng on our door. We need answers Lo such quesLlons as: 1o whaL exLenL can Lechnologlcal
sysLems enLer agreemenLs or esLabllsh commlLmenLs by uLLerlng speech acLs? 1o whaL exLenL can
Lhey be held (morally) responslble or llable when Lhey auLonomously 'speak' and perform speech
acLs? 1o whaL exLenL are Lhelr deslgners and owners responslble or llable?
l wlll call speech acLs of Lhe second Lype pseudo-speech acLs, slnce Lhey are sLrucLurally dlsslmllar Lo
ordlnary speech acLs. l wlll Lhen lnvesLlgaLe Lhe usefulness of uenneLL's lnLenLlonal sLance and Lhlrd-
person approach (uenneLL 1993) for analyslng Lhese speech acLs and answerlng Lhe above quesLlons.
1he analysls wlll puL a heavy welghL on Lhe lnsLlLuLlonal and legal envlronmenL for successfully
performlng pseudo speech acLs. 1he normaLlve force of Lhese speech acLs has Lo reslde ln Lhls
envlronmenL - noL ln Lhe menLal make-up of arLlflclal agenLs - glven LhaL we are lgnoranL abouL Lhe
menLal make-up of Lhese agenLs or do noL wanL Lo make clalms abouL lL. 1he analysls lmplles LhaL ln
Lhe deslgn of Lechnologlcal sysLems LhaL generaLe arLlflclal speech acLs we need Lo deslgn Lhe
lnsLlLuLlonal and legal envlronmenL for Lhese sysLems as well.
8eferences
uenneLL, uanlel C. 1993. 1he lnLenLlonal sLance. Cambrldge, Mass. [u.a.]: Ml1 ress.
kroes, eLer, and AnLhonle Mel[ers, ed. 2006. Speclal lssue: 1he uual naLure of 1echnlcal ArLefacLs."
SLudles ln PlsLory and hllosophy of Sclence arL A 37 (1) (March): 1-183.
Searle, !ohn 8. 1969. Speech AcLs: an Lssay ln Lhe hllosophy of Language. London: Cambrldge
unlverslLy ress.
a
n
e
|
L
437
---. 1983. lnLenLlonallLy, an essay ln Lhe phllosophy of mlnd. Cambrldge [Cambrldgeshlre], new
?ork: Cambrldge unlverslLy ress.
1sohaLzldls, Savas L. 2007. !ohn Searle's phllosophy of language: force, meanlng, and mlnd.
Cambrldge, new ?ork: Cambrldge unlverslLy ress.
* * *
S11"/+$%**B'(./+"1+"#'(./(":+1'%/#'1+%+$1+$(%*'1B1+"<1'
Craham WPl1L
LlecLronlc Lnglneerlng and CompuLer Sclence, Cueen Mary
unlverslLy of London, uk
graham[eecs.qmul.ac.uk
We llve ln a Llme ln whlch Lhe sLaLlsLlcal processlng of LexLs has become commonplace: sLaLlsLlcal
sysLems, by whlch l mean soclal and Lechnologlcal sysLems whlch can be used for Lhe purposes of
shopplng, web search, eLc., are now an lmporLanL facLor ln our llves. 8ecause of Lhls, our access Lo
LexLs ls, ln many cases, medlaLed by sLaLlsLlcal sysLems and Lhe [udgemenLs LhaL Lhey make: Coogle
presenLs Lhe resulLs of lLs searches based on relevance," markeLlng agencles [udge Lhe popularlLy of
producLs on Lhe basls of senLlmenLs" exLracLed from Lhe analysls of LweeLs, and so on (Lhe words ln
scare quoLes are concepLs lnLernal Lo sLaLlsLlcal processlng whlch are somehow relaLed Lo concepLs
expressed ln naLural language). We ask how well sLaLlsLlcal sysLems can express [udgemenLs LhaL we,
as humans, make abouL language.
We sLarL wlLh Lhe ldea of essenLlally conLesLed concepLs [Callle, 1936], namely concepLs Lhe proper
use of whlch lnevlLably lnvolves endless dlspuLes abouL Lhelr proper uses on Lhe parL of Lhelr users".
Modern uses of Lhls ldea lnvolve, for example, femlnlsL and gay argumenLs abouL Lhe proper
deflnlLlon of a human belng, or of gender, or of marrlage. Pow would sLaLlsLlcal sysLems cope wlLh
such concepLs? Cne response mlghL be LhaL Lhey would deLecL LhaL Lhe uses of such a word would
aggregaLe lnLo more Lhan one clusLer, correspondlng Lo Lhe llngulsLlc behavlour of Lhe parLles ln Lhe
dlspuLe. 8uL, Callle argues, essenLlally conLesLed concepLs are noL amblguous: amblgulLy ls when a
word ls assoclaLed wlLh more Lhan one meanlng, and Lhls plurallLy of meanlng would correspond Lo a
plurallLy of clusLers. LssenLlally conLesLed concepLs, raLher, occur when we have one concepL Lhe
deflnlLlon or arLlculaLlon of whlch ls conLesLable.
lurLhermore, Lhese concepLs are essenLlally conLesLed: Lhe dlspuLes wlll noL go away, because
decldlng on Lhelr proper use would mean resolvlng pollLlcal or soclal lssues whlch are deeply rooLed
ln our socleLy. So, how would a sLaLlsLlcal sysLem deal wlLh Lhem? Suppose LhaL lL resolved Lhe
concepL lnLo Lwo subconcepLs: Lhen lL would be denylng Lhe reallLy of Lhe dlspuLe (saylng, for
example, LhaL whaL same-sex couples mean by marrlage ls noL Lhe same as whaL heLerosexuals mean
by lL). 1hls would seem Lo bellLLle Lhe [usLlflably pollLlcal concerns of boLh sldes ln Lhe dlspuLe.
Suppose, on Lhe oLher hand, LhaL Lhls sysLem LreaLed Lhe concepL as a slngle concepL: Lhen one could
a
n
e
|
L
438
flnd ouL abouL Lhe proper use of Lhls concepL by examlnlng Lhe [udgemenLs" made by Lhe sLaLlsLlcal
sysLem (lf lL were a shopplng sysLem, one could examlne lLs recommendaLlons on weddlng aLLlre, for
example). 8uL Lhen one would have Lhe dlspuLe resolved one way or Lhe oLher, sllenLly and wlLhouL
any expllclL debaLe or consensus formaLlon: and one can lmaglne how Lhe losers ln such a dlspuLe
would feel.
1here ls, however, a way ouL: a sLaLlsLlcal sysLem ls someLhlng Lhe [udgemenLs of whlch converge Lo
sLable values as a resulL of Lhe accumulaLlon of evldence. Such a sysLem could slmply noL converge.
We argue LhaL, flrsLly, Lhls ls a very real posslblllLy maLhemaLlcally, secondly, LhaL examlnaLlon of real
dlspuLes (edlL wars ln lacebook, for example) shows LhaL Lhls may occur, and, Lhlrdly, LhaL Lhls
posslblllLy ls preflgured by maLerlal ln Schlelermacher's lecLures on hermeneuLlcs, ln whlch he
descrlbed Lhe lnLerpreLaLlon of LexLs as an lnflnlLe Lask".
8eferences
W.8. Callle. LssenLlally conLesLed concepLs. roceedlngs of Lhe ArlsLoLelean
SocleLy, 36:167-198, 1936.
* * *
Lnact|ve search: 1he semant|cs of |anguage |n the age of soc|a| med|a
Parry PALln
lnsLlLuL d'la 8echerche eL l'lnnovaLlon du CenLre ompldou, lrance
hhalpln[w3.org
Clven Lhe lncreaslng promlnence of Lechnologlcally-medlaLed communlcaLlon, Lhe quesLlon of how
Lechnology lmpacLs exlsLlng languages and forms new languages deserves a Lhorough phllosophlcal
lnvesLlgaLlon. MosL approaches Lo semanLlcs assume naLural language as a pre-glven ob[ecL of sLudy
or aL besL approach lL Lhrough Lhe lens of developmenLal psychology. ?eL Lhere has been an enLlre
separaLe llne of sLudy of semanLlcs of formal and Lechnlcal languages, prlmarlly ln Lhe sLudy of
knowledge represenLaLlon and arLlflclal lnLelllgence. Powever, Lhls work has been consldered
generally as elLher removed from human language or as a model of human language.
ln Lhe age of Coogle and 1wlLLer, Lhese phllosophlcal presumpLlons no longer hold. 1he use of human
language ls expllclLly caughL up Lhe developmenL of Lechnology. ln our approach, we wlll Lake an
expllclLly consLrucLlvlsL (enacLlve) approach Lo Lhe semanLlcs of soclal medla - ln oLher words, how
people use 1wlLLer, lacebook, Lagglng Lo leave "soclal Lralls" and how LhaL challenges LradlLlonal
cognlLlve Lheorles of memory, represenLaLlon, and even semanLlcs.
a
n
e
|
L
439
Cur "exLernallsL" readlng of enacLlon Lakes as lLs foundaLlons Lhe LxLended Mlnd (Clark), dlsLrlbuLed
cognlLlon (PuLchlns) and relaLes Lhem expllclLly Lo MaLurana's work on auLopolesls and varela and
1hompson's laLer work on enacLlon. We would clalm LhaL under cerLaln condlLlons (Lo be explored)
enacLlve/consLrucLlvlsL approaches are lmplemenLed ln cerLaln compuLaLlonal sysLems, whlch
Lherefore lmplles LhaL conLra MaLurana enacLlve approaches can be lmplemenLed over
compuLaLlonal sysLems LhaL are (aL leasL) ln parL non-blologlcal buL may be enLlrely non-blologlcal. ln
facL, we would argue LhaL vlewlng a flrm separaLlon beLween blologlcal readlngs of
consLrucLlvlsm/enacLlon and compuLaLlonal funcLlonallsm ls lncorrecL. 1hus, we defend boLh
enacLlon and compuLaLlonallsm agalnsL even cerLaln readlngs of embodled cognlLlon (noe), Lylng
LogeLher Lheorles of semanLlcs wlLh a flrmly lnformaLlon-processlng funcLlonal paradlgm LhaL ls
noneLheless resoluLely grounded ln Lhe everyday behavlor cerLaln Lechnologlcal forms of llfe.
1hls exLernal readlng of enacLlon Lhen serves as Lhe basls of a new klnd ofsoclal semanLlcs LhaL
embeds LradlLlonal Lheorles of semanLlcs flrmly wlLhln soclal and dlsLrlbuLed processes, uslng 1wlLLer
(and lmaglned exLenslons Lhereof uslng Coogle Classes, eLc.) as a guldlng example due Lo lLs
popularlLy. ln concluslon, Lhls polnL of Lhe larger sLory abouL whaL we conslder an unhealLhy
blologlcal blas ln consLrucLlvlsL approaches Lo enacLlon as well as an equally unhealLhy problem ln
LradlLlonal non-consLucLlvlsL approaches Lo Lhe semanLlcs of compuLaLlonal "knowledge
represenLaLlon" Lo lgnore enacLlon and Lhe soclal - and Lhus mlss Lhe polnL of Lhe Lechnologlcal
revoluLlon ln human communlcaLlon LhaL we are llvlng ln Loday.
a
n
e
|
I
440
ane| I
Cl1? 8LlC8M, lC1s Anu
8lC1LCPnCLCClCAL CLl1lCAL
C1Ln1lAL
Chalr: 8oger Andrade uu18A
a
n
e
|
I
441
L$+B',"0.,<&';LD1'%/#'4$.+"(2/.*.3$(%*':.*$+$(%*':.+"/+$%*''
8oger Andrade uu18A
ueparLmenL of LducaLlon
CenLro lederal de Lducao 1ecnolglca de Mlnas Cerals (CLlL1-MC), 8razll
moblllLas[gmall.com
Carlos lC81unA
School of Lconomlcs and CenLer for Soclal SLudles
unlverslLy of Colmbra, orLugal
8oselane 8LZL88A
CenLer for Soclal SLudles
unlverslLy of Colmbra, orLugal
8eglna Pelena Alves da SlLvA
ueparLmenL of PlsLory
unlversldade lederal de Mlnas Cerals (ulMC), 8razll
reglna.helena[gmall.com
urban spaces are places where Lhe vlrLues and dllemmas assoclaLed wlLh new lnformaLlon and
communlcaLlon Lechnologles (lC1s) Lo acLuallze. ln Lhem, Lhe lncessanL lnLeracLlon glves an
lncompleLe and provlslonal characLer. 1hls requlres publlc auLhorlLles wlLh Lhe ablllLy Lo arLlculaLe
Lransversal phenomena LhaL ofLen are conLradlcLory. ln Lhls anel, our proposal ls Lo dlscuss Lhree
modes of percepLlon of spaLlal orders looklng aL Lhelr polnLs converglng ways Lo promoLe Lhe vlrLues
and weaken Lhe dllemmas produced by lC1s.
1 - Cur proposal ls Lo dlscuss "CommunlcaLlve ArchlLecLures of publlc space" LhaL are engendered
from a paradlgm shlfL LhaL enables Lhlnklng Lhe lnLerneL as a plaLform allled Lo Lhe percepLlon of Lhe
clLy as emergenL phenomena and Lhelr undersLandlng as parLlclpaLory creaLlon of new
lnLerpreLaLlons and approprlaLlons of urban space. Cne of Lhe maln lssues ralsed from Lhls
relaLlonshlp, and whlch ls lmporLanL closely Lo us, ls Lhe lnLroducLlon of lC1s ln convenLlonal models
of urban managemenL, whlch can noL remaln on Lhe frlnges of Lhe changes broughL abouL by new
Lechnologles. ln Lhls sense, Lhe lnLegraLlon of Lechnologles ln urban spaces poses Lwo challenges: on
one hand, Lhe dlverslLy and complexlLy of lnformaLlon sources and daLabases LhaL underpln Lhe
funcLlonlng of a clLy requlre Lhe developmenL of Lools for dlglLal daLa vlsuallzaLlon of urban spaces ln
order Lo enable users, wheLher Lhey are managers or clLlzens, Lo approprlaLe Lhe lnformaLlon ln
order Lo explore Lhe clLy and Lo make declslons abouL lL. Cn Lhe oLher hand, dlglLal urban plaLforms
reLrleve an old debaLe abouL a concepL whlch hs suffered Loo many manlpulaLlons: clLlzen
parLlclpaLlon.
2 - We sLarL from Lhe presumpLlon LhaL Lhe process of lC1s urbanlzaLlon opens up Lhe clLy Lo a
dlfferenL mode of governance, whlch ls more democraLlc and parLlclpaLlve. Powever Lhls ls noL a
sLralghLforward process for Lhe uses of lC1s, for Lhey noL only demand a glven level of soclo-Lechnlcal
capablllLles buL Lhey also convey a glven phllosophlcal loglc LhaL mlghL produce soclal enclosures
a
n
e
|
I
442
raLher Lhan enlarge clLlzen's parLlclpaLlon. Maklng use of Almada's ongolng genLrlflcaLlon process,
we'll be looklng aL, on one hand, Lhe uses of lC1s by local offlclals as Lo promoLe urban reform, on
Lhe oLher hand, lLs crlLlcal recepLlon and feedback ln local blogs and soclal neLworks. Cn Lhls basls we
do lnLend Lo LesL Lhe lnlLlal double-edge hypoLhesls of Lhe democraLlc openlng/non-democraLlc
closure of clLy llfe broughL up by new lC1s.
3 - lC1s and bloLechnology are dlverslfylng forms of excluslon and marglnallzaLlon. Cn one hand,
crlLlclsm of Lechnosclences vla Lhelr "promlscuous uLlllLy", ln Langdon Wlnner's words, has always
been unable Lo change Lhese course of Lechnosclences. Cn Lhe oLher hand, Lhe conformaLlon of
urban spaces, where Lhey maLerlallze dally, offers excellenL opporLunlLles for cross-moldlngs, ln
whlch LechnosclenLlflc lmperlallsm could be consLralned by: (a) Lhe sLrengLhenlng of collecLlve
ldenLlLles and (b) Lhe demand for urban spaces recepLlve Lo all modes of exlsLence and ldenLlLy. lf Lhe
mulLlculLural debaLes esLabllshed pollLlcal ldenLlLles of lmmlgranL, eLhnlc, gender or llnked Lo skln
color mlnorlLles, Lhe ldenLlLles aL rlsk Loday are Lhose Laken [usL as paLhologlcal - sufferlng from
uown syndrome, deafness, bllndness, dumbness eLc. WlLhouL neglecLlng dlfflculLles, reduclng paln or
sufferlng Lo mere dlfferences, we musL recognlze LhaL Lhe hosLlllLy of urban spaces can accenLuaLe
dlsabllng condlLlons, whaL also conLrlbuLes Lo Lhe leglLlmlzaLlon of eugenlc bloLechnology. 1he lnLenL
of Lhls lnLervenLlon ls Lo dlscuss some characLerlsLlcs and lmpllcaLlons of urban spaces LhaL serve as
deLerrenLs Lo Lhe excluslonary pracLlces of lC1s and eugenlc bloLechnology.
a
n
e
|
G
443
ane| G
lnnCvA1lCn 8L?Cnu
1LCPnCLCC?: AL1L8nA1lvL
A8CACPLS Anu AL1L8nA1lvL
8LSCnSLS
Chalr: leLer vL8MAAS
a
n
e
|
G
444
;//.5%+$./'4"B./#'+"(2/.*.3B6'I*+",/%+$5"'%::,.%(2"1'%/#'%*+",/%+$5"',"1:./1"1'
leLer vL8MAAS
uelfL unlverslLy of 1echnology, 1he neLherlands
p.e.vermaas[LudelfL.nl
Marlanne 8CLnlnk
1wenLe unlverslLy, 1he neLherlands
m.boenlnk[uLwenLe.nl
ueborah !CPnSCn
unlverslLy of vlrglnla, uSA
dg[7p[vlrglnla.edu
Alfred nC8uMAnn
1echnlsche unlverslLaL uarmsLadL, Cermany
nordmann[phll.Lu-darmsLadL.de
lbo vAn uL CLL
uelfL unlverslLy of 1echnology, 1he neLherlands
l.r.vandepoel[LudelfL.nl
1he classlcal framlng of Lhe developmenL of Lechnology as due Lo new Lechnlcal flndlngs LhaL flnd
Lhelr appllcaLlon ln new producLs and processes has by now losL lLs domlnance ln phllosophy of
Lechnology. 1echnologlcal developmenL, and speclflcally lnnovaLlon, ls shaped by addlLlonal facLors
and by processes more complex Lhan mere appllcaLlon of new flndlngs. new Lechnlcal flndlngs can
creaLe enabllng Lechnologles, as does n8lC convergence, and Lhen deflne a plaLform for lnnovaLlon,
raLher Lhan be LhaL lnnovaLlon lLself. ueslgn has evolved beyond solvlng seL problems ln Lerms of
Lechnlcal producLs and has become dlrecLed Lowards shaplng and reshaplng Lhe value of Lhese
producLs, addlng a new dlmenslon Lo Lhe developmenL of Lechnology.
lncludlng Lhese alLernaLlve approaches Lo Lechnologlcal developmenL ln our Lhlnklng challenges
exlsLlng responses Lo lL. laLforms and deslgn meLhods for lnnovaLlon are someLlmes recommended
for Lhelr poLenLlal Lo creaLe developmenLs LhaL cannoL be predlcLed nor anLlclpaLed, whlch means
LhaL Lhe noLlon of Lechnology assessmenL, seen as charLlng, dlscusslng and lnLervenlng wlLh
developmenLs ln Lechnology, needs revlslLlng. ?eL Lhls emergence also opens posslblllLy for
phllosophy of Lechnology Lo deflne new responses Lo lnnovaLlon and lLs unpredlcLable consequences.
ln Lhls panel we look aL lnnovaLlon Lo explore lLs alLernaLlve approaches and for surveylng new ways
of respondlng Lo lL. We open by flve plLch presenLaLlons Lo seL Lhe sLage and Lhen broaden Lhe
dlscusslon Lo a plenary one.
a
n
e
|
G
44S
lLches
Marlanne 8CLnlnk
ln recenL years, values have acqulred an lncreaslngly promlnenL role ln lnnovaLlon and lnnovaLlon
pollcles. Cn Lhe one hand, Lechnology developers and deslgners lncreaslngly frame Lhelr goal ln
Lerms of value creaLlon (ln a broad sense), someLlmes leadlng Lo expllclL 'value senslLlve' deslgn
approaches. Cn Lhe oLher hand, recenL sLraLegles for anLlclpaLory governance and 1A lncreaslngly
Lend Lo lnclude aL leasL some aLLenLlon for values. Powever, ln boLh cases values are usually seen as
sLable phenomena, whlch can be used as unequlvocal crlLerla for assesslng Lhe deslrablllLy of
lnnovaLlon. 1hls lgnores Lhe facL LhaL morallLy ls dynamlc, parLly as a resulL of Lechnologlcal change.
1he challenge for phllosophy of Lechnology, l wlll argue, ls Lwofold: (1) Lo brlng ln Lhe noLlon of
Lechno-moral change ln lnnovaLlon and lnnovaLlon pollcles, (2) wlLhouL falllng prey Lo nave noLlons
of sLeerlng such change.
ueborah !CPnSCn
1echnologlcal developmenL and lnnovaLlon are vlLally lmporLanL because Lhe Lechnologles produced
and adopLed sLrucLure Lhe world ln whlch human llves Lake place. 1echnology AssessmenL (1A) of
some klnd ls, Lherefore, lmporLanL Lhough LradlLlonal forms of 1A don'L seem Lo Lake lnLo accounL
LhaL Lhe processes of Lechnologlcal developmenL and lnnovaLlon are mulLl-dlrecLlonal, conLlngenL
and lnvolve many dlfferenL acLors and facLors. 1A doesn'L seem Lo Lake lnLo accounL Lhe conLlngency
and uncerLalnLy of Lechnologlcal developmenL, especlally Lhe fluldlLy of soclal arrangemenLs and
soclal pracLlces LhaL consLlLuLe new Lechnologles. ALLempLs Lo conLrol or sLrucLure Lhe developmenL
process - Lo make lL more efflclenL, fasLer, more value-generaLlng - are undersLandable Lhough also
problemaLlc for a varleLy of reasons.
Alfred nC8uMAnn
ulfferenL concepLs of deslgn can be conLrasLed and relaLe Lo dlfferenL approaches Lo 1echnology
AssessmenL (1A). 1here ls flrsL Lhe noLlon LhaL deslgn seeks producLlve anLlclpaLlons of Lhe fuLure
whlch corresponds Lo 1A ln Lhe soclal shaplng ldlom and whlch confronLs Lhe Colllngrldge dllemma.
1hls form of 1A Lakes Lhe fuLure as an ob[ecL of deslgn. 1here ls second Lhe noLlon LhaL ln an lLeraLlve
process deslgn aLLunes sysLem performance Lo user expecLaLlons. lL corresponds Lo 1A ln Lhe ldlom
of collecLlve learnlng from soclal experlmenLaLlon. 1he Lwo approaches are crlLlcally evaluaLed ln
Lerms of Lechnlcal hubrls of 1A.
a
n
e
|
G
446
lbo vAn uL CLL
lnLroducLlon of Lechnology lnLo socleLy should noL be concelved of as lmplemenLaLlon buL raLher as a
form of experlmenLaLlon and on-golng developmenL. AdvanLages and dlsadvanLages of new
Lechnology can only parLly be anLlclpaLed and wlll usually become gradually known ln a process of
soclal experlmenLaLlon. 1hls perspecLlve ralses new quesLlons abouL how we should organlze
learnlng processes and how Lo experlmenL wlLh Lechnology ln a soclally and morally responslble way.
leLer vL8MAAS
ln currenL deslgn meLhods lL ls expllclLly argued LhaL deslgners spur lnnovaLlon by Laklng dellberaLe
dlsLance from Lhe Lhree oLher key-acLors lnvolved ln deslgn. CusLomers may lnlLlaLe a deslgn process
buL lL ls Lhe deslgner who formulaLes whaL acLual goals Lhese cusLomers have. Managers of deslgn
processes are seL aslde as kllllng serendlplLous lnnovaLlon by Lhelr pre-seL LargeLs. And user-cenLred
deslgn ls seen as leadlng Lo mere lncremenLal lmprovemenLs. ueslgn has become a separaLe source
of lnnovaLlon LhaL creaLes lnnovaLlve proposlLlons Lo people raLher Lhan solves Lhe problems people
formulaLe.
a
n
e
|
n
447
ane| n
knCWLLuCL CCMMunl1lLS Anu
AC1lCn ln C?8L8SACL
Chalr: Andonl ALCnSC
a
n
e
|
n
448
f/.8*"#3"'(.<<)/$+$"1'%/#'%(+$./'$/'(B4",1:%("'
Andonl ALCnSC
CompluLense unlverslLy of Madrld, Spaln
andonlal[ucm.es
Carl Ml1CPAM
Colorado School of Mlnes, uSA
8amon CuL8AL1C
unlverslLy of Sevllle, Spaln
Langdon WlnnL8
8ensselaer olyLechnlc lnsLlLuLe, 1roy, uSA
1hls panel wlll reporL on and explore lssues ralsed by a mulLldlsclpllnary collaboraLlon beLween
Spanlsh and Amerlcan scholars on Lhe phenomenon of communlLles belng based noL ln geography or
ln economlcs buL on knowledge producLlon and uLlllzaLlon and Lhe pollLlcal acLlvlLles LhaL such
communlLles can underLake ln cyberspace.
knowledge communlLles shaped by LelecommunlcaLlon neLworks have creaLed lmporLanL changes ln
how knowledge ls generaLed and used. llrsL, Lhese new LelecommunlcaLlon-based communlLles
make posslble alLernaLlves Lo Lhe usual lnsLlLuLlons of knowledge producLlon such as 8&u
organlzaLlons, sLaLes, and prlvaLe companles. A paradlgmaLlc case ls free sofLware, Lhe producLlon of
enLlre compuLer operaLlng sysLems such as Cnu/Llnux and oLher wldely used dlglLal uLlllLles such as
CpenCfflce or llrefox. 1elecommunlcaLlon knowledge communlLles produce noL [usL sofLware buL
also conLenL such as Wlklpedla, whlch ls a good example of free knowledge.
Second, sclence communlcaLlon even wlLhln Lhe usual lnsLlLuLlons of knowledge producLlon ls lLself
undergolng lnLernal changes. Lxamples lnclude Lhe creaLlon of open access [ournals such as LCS,
lnLerneL pre-publlcaLlon by LradlLlonal [ournals such as Sclence and naLure, and Lhe greaLer sharlng
of daLa assoclaLed wlLh prlnL publlcaLlon by means of parallel web posLlngs.
1hlrd, LelecommunlcaLlon-based knowledge communlLles Lend Lo also be based ln more democraLlc
and parLlclpaLory pollLlcal values Lhan oLher Lypes of knowledge communlLles. lL ls lmporLanL Lo Lry Lo
analyze how such values as lnformaLlon freedom, sharlng, Lransparency, and openness develop and
are manlfesL ln Lhese communlLles.
ln sum, LelecommunlcaLlon-based knowledge communlLles dlfferenL ways Lo undersLand soclal
archlLecLure and Lhelr normaLlve bonds for Lhe producLlon and sharlng of knowledge. AL Lhe same
Llme Lhere ls a vlral sLraLegy affecLlng more and more realms of knowledge. Lxamples could be
labeled hldden soclal lnnovaLlons LhaL occur ln socleLles LhaL become more lnLeracLlve and
LransparenL ln ways LhaL conLrlbuLe Lo acLlons Lo respond Lo soclal lssues. AL Lhe same Llme Lhere are
also sofL knowledge communlLles unlLed by weak bonds. 1hese belong mosLly whaL lL ls labeled as
Web 2.0. ?ou1ube, lace8ook, lkasa, 1wlLLle, MySpace, CrkuL, eLc. 1here ls a connecLlon beLween
a
n
e
|
n
449
boLh Lypes of communlLles: Web 2.0 made popular Lhe ldea of soclal neLworklng and sLrong
communlLles have spread wlLh LhaL concepL. 8uL Lhere ls a danger of Lrlvlallzlng sLrong communlLles
LhaL represenL a valuable klnd of acLlvlsm. When corporaLlons conslder LhaL 80 of Lhe web conLenL
wlll be produced by amaLeur users lL ls lmporLanL Lo undersLand serlously whaL ls golng on wlLh Lhese
knowledge communlLles and how Lo avold Lhe enclosure of Lhe dlglLal commons.
1oplcs open Lo panel dlscusslon wlll lnclude Lhe followlng:
WhaL ls a knowledge communlLy?
Pow do knowledge communlLles dlffer from oLher Lypes of communlLles?
WhaL are Lhe relaLlonshlps beLween pre-LelecommunlcaLlon knowledge communlLles and
LelecommunlcaLlon-based knowledge communlLles?
ls a Lypology of precursors Lo conLemporary knowledge communlLles? Are rellglons knowledge
communlLles? ls sclence Lhe archeLype of a knowledge communlLy?
Are all knowledge communlLy changes lnLroduced or faclllLaLed by lC1 always good? 1o whaL
exLenL can or do Lhey have negaLlve lmpllcaLlons?
WhaL ls Lhe eLhlcs and pollLlcs of knowledge communlLles?
a
n
e
|
4S0
ane| I
nAnC1LCPnCLCC? L1PlCS Anu
CLlC? LuuCA1lCn ln A CLC8AL
CCn1Lx1
Chalr: Carl Ml1CPAM
a
n
e
|
4S1
7%/.+"(2/.*.3B'"+2$(1'%/#':.*$(B'"#)(%+$./'$/'%'3*.4%*'(./+"@+'
Carl Ml1CPAM
Colorado School of Mlnes, uSA
cmlLcham[mlnes.edu
Andonl l8A88A
unlverslLy of 8asque CounLry, Spaln
PannoL 8Cu8lCuLZ
unlverslLy of 8asque CounLry, Spaln
Alfred nC8uMAnn
1u uarmsLadL, Cermany
WAnC nan
unlverslLy of Chlnese Academy of Sclences, Chlna
1hls panel wlll explore nanoLechnology eLhlcs and pollcy educaLlon ln a global conLexL. anellsLs wlll
provlde a brlef overvlew of Lhe emergence of nanosclence and nanoLechnology research pollcles ln
selecL dlfferenL counLrles, along wlLh assoclaLed eLhlcs and pollcy educaLlon lnlLlaLlves and acLlvlLles.
1aklng Lhe unlLed SLaLes as an lnfluenLlal case, we wlll reflecL on Lhe emergence and expanslve
adapLaLlon of Lhe eLhlcs educaLlon componenL of Lhe naLlonal nanoLechnology lnlLlaLlve (nnl). As
one conLrlbuLlon Lo Lhls cross-cuLLlng federal program, Lhe naLlonal Sclence loundaLlon ln 2003
esLabllshed Lhe nanoLechnology undergraduaLe LducaLlon (nuL) rogram Lo lnLegraLe nanoscale
sclence, englneerlng, and Lechnology lnLo Lhe undergraduaLe englneerlng currlcula." AddlLlonally,
1he nuL program provldes fundlng for pro[ecLs LhaL wlll address Lhe educaLlonal challenges of Lhese
emerglng flelds and generaLe pracLlcal ways of lnLroduclng nanoLechnology lnLo undergraduaLe
englneerlng educaLlon wlLh a focus on devlces and sysLems and/or on socleLal, economlc, and eLhlcal
lssues relevanL Lo nanoLechnology." 8eflecLlng on Len years of developmenL, Lhe !ournal of nano
LducaLlon ls publlshlng a speclal lssue devoLed Lo Lhe nuL rogram, Lhe panel wlll begln by
hlghllghLlng some dlscusslons from Lhls speclal lssue on nano-eLhlcs educaLlon.
Cne such nuL-funded acLlvlLy ls Lhe lnLerdlsclpllnary nano-Sclence, 1echnology, LLhlcs, and ollcy
(nanoS1L) pro[ecL aL Lhe Colorado School of Mlnes, whlch ls devoLed Lo lnLroduclng boundary-
crosslng socleLal, eLhlcal, economlc, and envlronmenLal (S3L) lssues aL mulLlple levels ln humanlLles
and soclal sclences course requlremenLs. nanoS1L furLher seeks Lo beLLer undersLand Lhe
effecLlveness and lnfluence of eLhlcs and pollcy learnlng ln Lhe undergraduaLe englneerlng
currlculum, uslng nanoLechnology as a framework. ln complemenL Lo Lhls educaLlonal research,
nanoS1L ls also examlnlng relaLlonshlps beLween emerglng Lechnologles and underrepresenLed
populaLlons, wlLh respecL Lo Lhe poLenLlal for envlronmenLal and soclal [usLlce deflclencles, boLh ln
access Lo opporLunlLles for research and educaLlon and ln regard Lo beneflLLlng from nano-8&u.
a
n
e
|
4S2
CollaboraLlve connecLlons have also been made wlLh Lhe unlverslLy of Lhe 8asque CounLry and Lhe
unlverslLy of Lhe Chlnese Academy of Sclences.
1oplcs open Lo panel dlscusslon wlll lnclude Lhe followlng:
WhaL ls Lhe purpose (goal, ob[ecLlve) of nano-eLhlcs educaLlon?
ls nano-eLhlcs a dlsLlncLlve form of Lhe eLhlcs of Lechnology?
Are Lhere reasons Lo lnclude non-Lechnlcal sLudenLs ln nano-eLhlcs educaLlon?
WhaL are Lhe relaLlonshlps beLween nano-eLhlcs and Lhe humanlLles and soclal sclences more
generally?
ls nano-eLhlcs educaLlon enhanced by educaLlon regardlng nano-pollcy?
WhaL ls Lhe proper scope of lssues Lo be addressed ln nano-eLhlcs educaLlon?
Are Lhere any Loplcs ln nano-eLhlcs LhaL have noL been sufflclenLly addressed or are
underrepresenLed?
WhaL are Lhe mosL effecLlve pedagoglcal approaches Lo nano-eLhlcs educaLlon?
Pow ls nano-eLhlcs educaLlon belng pracLlced ln dlfferenL counLrles?