Lucidity and Patterns By Bea Augustine Being not ambiguous should be the sounder option, especially when it comes

to simply delivering a message. What comes artless is the choice whether to be explicit or not. It might be about whether one reads articles or fiction, or just the newsfeed on social media, where one might choose to like some good paper or the professional resource that will later shape one`s opinions. Still, even the newsfeed might get at times appear overwhelming, considering that our scan performance may differ occasionally. The most essential thing in the communication is still the choice what to do, how to proceed and what agenda should one prepare for themselves. Living that agenda every day is what will matter the most for the majority that are within 1.96 standard deviations of the mean on the bell-shaped curve, depicting the normal distribution pattern. If I need to explain what this number means, this simply is to imply that the area between minus and plus 1.96 encompasses 95% of the population in the specific analysis matter. Still, the clarity of explanation, coupled with the more or less lack of ambiguity, makes the most of one`s attempts to get in or out of the habitual thinking. One still might like to decide on whether to use complex verb structures or kurze Stze (short sentences). It may be different at the time of understanding, e.g. I just want some breakfast and Would you be as kind as to help me prepare the breakfast today? or Kannst di bittte das Frhstck vorbereiten? Of course, I will be not too deliberate on this, be it that I prefer to be conscientious and thoughtful. Patterns and models are just a way to make life easier and to help deal with the challenges that one may come upon daily or occasionally. Then, in the end, it might be only about whether one would like to stay lucid enough, to make their point clear, with the pre-requisite that the preferred communication style might still require one to be succinct. We might be all trying to express ourselves better and, still, depending on the time of the day and on the day of the week, and on the formulae that one needs to use, or the functions that appear apposite enough to help better achieve or understand the results set, this will lead to a choice of style and a way of expression. There are so many modes of action and enough choices on the methods to achieve one target or another, that I expect no one now thinks there is only one way of doing things right. The fact is, too, sometimes even one cannot expect to have things done the first time, this might be sometimes a point of circumstances or a function of something that could be, or not, outside our area of comprehension. Sometimes one might like the better set of circumstances or, it might be that the regularity is the final goal within the standard working hours, if one still thinks that the day should be separated in working and non-working hours. The varieties and variability happen all the time, that make shape a different self for some of us, that gradually over time evolves and, in the end, one might change their way of thinking just to see how this should impact their way of behaving. Changing patterns might be the sounder option, too, just like avoiding clever wording may lead to a better understanding in view of the lucidity topics.