Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ASSUMPTIONS YOU SHOULD MAKE: the VP-internal subject hypothesis, specically the version with v P. Also assume that PP adjuncts and low AdvPs are adjoined to VP (not to v P). BACKGROUND YOULL NEED: Japanese exhibits a phenomenon called scrambling. This process can move an object to a position higher than the subject; assume that the object ends up adjoined to IP. (1) a. Gakusei-ga hon-o katta (SOV = base order) student-NOM book-ACC bought Students bought books b. Hon-o gakusei-ga katta (OSV = scrambled order) book-ACC student-NOM bought Student bought books (Books, students bought) Japanese exhibits a phenomenon called numeral quantier oat (like the quantier oat of all in English that we discussed in class). The numeral quantier consists of a number and a nominal classier. CL = nominal classier (similar to English a cup of milk , a sheet of paper , a grain of sand ). Now consider the following data: (2) a. Gakusei-ga hon-o 2-satu kat-ta student-NOM book-ACC 2-CL buy-Past Students bought two books b. Gakusei-ga 2-ri hon-o kat-ta student-NOM 2-CL book-ACC buy-Past Two students bought books c. Hon-o gakusei-ga 2-satu kat-ta book-ACC student-NOM 2-CL buy-Past d. Students bought two books (Books, students bought two) * Gakusei-ga hon-o 2-ri kat-ta student-NOM book-ACC 2-CL buy-Past Two students bought books
Now consider the following data: (3) * Kodomo-ga kono kagi-de 2-ri doa-o ake-ta child-NOM this key-with 2-CL door-ACC open-Past Two children opened the door with this key a. Kyaku-ga ryokan-ni 2-ri tui-ta guest-NOM inn-at 2-CL arrive-Past Two guests arrived at the inn b. Doa-ga kono kagi-de 2-tu ai-ta door-NOM this key-with 2-CL open-Past Two doors opened with this key c. Gakusei-ga osu-ni 2-ri ki-ta student-NOM oce-to 2-CL come-Past Two students came to the oce a. * Gakusei-ga zibun-no kane-de 2-ri denwa-si-ta student-NOM self-GEN money-with 2-CL telephone-Past Two students telephoned using their own money * Kodomo-ga geragera to 2-ri warat-ta child-NOM loudly 2-CL laugh-Past Two children laughed loudly.
(4)
(5)
b.
(6)
a. Kuruma-ga doroboo-ni 3-dai nusum-are-ta car-NOM thief-by 3-CL steal-Passive-Past Three cars were stolen by the thief b. Gakusei-ga ano otoko-ni 2-ri koros-are-ta student-NOM that man-by 2-CL kill-Passive-Past Two students were killed by that man.
Question 2: Explain the patterns of grammaticality in (3), (4), (5), (6). Your explanation can be short, but will include a tree for (4b), (5b), and (6a). Now consider yet another set of data involving object experiencer verbs (class 2): (7) a. Faulkner-no hon-ga 2-satu Zyon-o utinome-si-ta Faulkner-GEN book-NOM 2-CL John-ACC bowl.over-Past Two of Faulkners books bowled John over b. * Faulkner-no hon-ga Zyon-o 2-satu utinome-si-ta Faulkner-GEN book-NOM John-ACC 2-CL bowl.over-Past Two of Faulkners books bowled John over a. Ii sirase-ga 2-tu Zyon-o zetuboo-e oiyat-ta good news-NOM 2-CL John-ACC despair-to drive-Past Two pieces of good news drove John to despair b. * Ii sirase-ga Zyon-o 2-tu zetuboo-e oiyat-ta good news-NOM John-ACC 2-CL despair-to drive-Past Two pieces of good news drove John to despair
(8)
c.
* Ii sirase-ga Zyon-o zetuboo-e 2-tu oiyat-ta good news-NOM John-ACC despair-to 2-CL drive-Past Two pieces of good news drove John to despair
NOTE: The structure of zetuboo-e oiyat-ta drive to despair is interesting, but dont let it distract you. Just call the whole thing a lexical verb for the purposes of this question. (This makes (8c) obviously bad, but I wanted to give you the example in case you were wondering.) Question 3: As discussed in class, object experiencer psych verbs pose a problem for UTAH/UAH. One solution is the proposal that such verbs are really unaccusative (Belletti & Rizzi), with the theme beginning in object position and then raising to subject position. Comment on this solution in light of the data in (7) and (8).
At the end of class, we entertained the suggestion that the subject of class 2 (like preoccupare) object experiencer psych verbs is not a theme but a causer. I gave the following example (in which we assume that Mary is a playwright): (9) The play didnt appeal to Mary (she thought it was terrible); but the play did please Mary (because she was happy to see her rival fail)
Recall that appeal to is class 3 ( like piacere), but please is class 2 (like preoccupare). Here is more data, from Japanese, showing subject experiencer and (class 2) object experiencer pairs: (10) a. Tanaka-ga sono sirase-o yorokon-da Tanaka-NOM that news-ACC be.pleased-Past Tanaka was pleased at that news. b. Sono sirase-ga Tanaka-o yorokob-ase-ta that news-NOM Tanaka-ACC be.pleased-Cause-Past That news pleased Tanaka a. Taroo-ga ongaku-o tanosin-da Taro-NOM music-ACC be.amused-Past Taro was amused at the music b. Ongaku-ga Taroo-o tanosim-ase-ta music-NOM Taroo-ACC be.amused-Cause-Past The music amused Taro
(11)
Question 1 Make an argument, based on these data from English and Japanese, that the subject of class 2 experiencer object verbs is a causer not a theme. (Yes, we need more data from a lot more languages, but this is a start.)
Consider the following data from nominalizations in English. The rst set shows you verbs that dont have an external cause as part of their meaning (participating in unaccusative/transitive pairs). In the transitive a causative head introduces the causer. Notice that these cant include the causer in the nominalization. The second set shows you class 2 object experiencer verbs. (12) a. Bill grows tomatoes. b. (Tomatoes grow.) c. the growth of tomatoes. d. * Bills growth of tomatoes a. Ination diminished his salary. b. (His salary diminished.) c. the diminishment of his salary d. * inations diminishment of his salary a. The bow vibrated the string. b. (The string vibrated.) c. the vibration of the string d. * the bows vibration of the string a. The toys amused the children. b. (the children were amused) c. the childrens amusement d. * the toys amusement (of the children) a. The movie frightened the boy. b. (The boy was frightened) c. the boys fright d. * the movies fright (of the boy) a. The news surprised the mayor. b. (The mayor was surprised.) c. the mayors surprise d. * the news surprise (of the mayo)r
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
Question 2 Make an argument, based on these data, that the subject of class 2 experiencer object verbs is a causer. (Yes, we need more data from a lot more languages, but this is a start.)