Wind Mill Project

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02)
CDM – Executive Board page 1
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

SIMPLIFIED PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT
FOR SMALL-SCALE PROJECT ACTIVITIES (SSC-CDM-PDD)
Version 02
CONTENTS
A. General description of the small-scale project activity
B. Baseline methodology
C. Duration of the project activity / Crediting period
D. Monitoring methodology and plan
E. Calculation of GHG emission reductions by sources
F. Environmental impacts
G. Stakeholders comments
Annexes
Annex 1: Information on participants in the project activity
Annex 2: Information regarding public funding
Appendix
Appendix 1: Baseline Information
Appendix 2: Project cash flows and assumptions certified by Charted Accountant

Revision history of this document
Version Date Description and reason of revision

Number
01 21 January Initial adoption
2003
02 8 July 2005 • The Board agreed to revise the CDM SSC PDD to reflect
guidance and clarifications provided by the Board since version
01 of this document.
As a consequence, the guidelines for completing CDM SSC PDD
have been revised accordingly to version 2. The latest version can be
found at < http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents>
SECTION A. General description of the small-scale project activity
A.1. Title of the small-scale project activity:

>>
Title : 12 MW Bundled Wind Power Project in Tenkasi, Tamilnadu
Version : Version 02
Date : October 2006
A.2. Description of the small-scale project activity:
>>
The project activity is the installation of Wind Electric Generators (WEGs) in Tenkasi of
Tirunelveli District in Tamil Nadu, Southern India. The project is located in one of the wind rich areas of
the country and the capacity utilisation factor expected is about 28.6% with an estimated annual
generation of 1,884,375 kWh per WEG. The project consists of 16 WEGs that are connected to the grid.
The WEGs owned by different entities are bundled together.
The project activity generates electricity and sells it to the State grid thereby displacing electricity
that would have been generated from predominantly thermal source. Electricity generated from the
project activity displaces approximately 22,552.2 t CO2e (tonnes of Carbon dioxide equivalent) annually.
During the initial crediting period of ten years the quantity of Carbon dioxide emission reductions
achieved would be 225522 t CO2e. The expected lifetime of the project is twenty years.
The project assists in the sustainable development of the Country, and the State in large by
reducing dependency on fossil fuels, reducing local air pollution, providing emission free clean electricity
and providing employment to rural youth both during the construction phase and the entire lifetime of the
project.
The highly coal dominated power sector in Tamil Nadu poses severe threats to the energy
security and the environment as well. Promotion of such projects ensures adequate power supply,
improved air quality, alternative sources of energy and improved local livelihoods.
A.3. Project participants:
>>
NEG Micon (I) Private Limited is the primary coordinator of the project and the other promoters
are individual entities whose WEGs are part of the project activity. NEG Micon (I) Private Limited acts
as a facilitator for the project activity and has entered into contractual agreements with other promoters to
carry out the CDM project activity on their behalf.
NEG Micon (I) Private Limited a 100% subsidiary of NEG Micon A/S Denmark having a market
share of 28% globally, has installed about 700 WEGs across the country adding about 500 MW to the
National grid.
NEG Micon (I) Private Limited shall be the single point contact for all communications with the
CDM Executive Board and the National CDM Authority. NEG Micon (I) Private Limited shall act as a
coordinator for providing all relevant information during this exercise. Information regarding the sharing
of CERs shall be provided as and when need arises. Thus for all practical purposes NEG Micon (I)
Private Limited is the project promoter.
Name of Party involved Private and / or Public entity Kindly indicate if the Party
Project Participants involved wishes to be considered
as Project Participant
Government of India
NEG Micon (I) Private Limited No
(Host Country)
There are eleven individual Project participants from various industries who have set up wind
turbines and are bundled in this Project. The Names of the project promoters, Capacity of the WEGs,
Commissioning Date of the WEGs, Location and the High Tension Service Connection number (a unique
number to identify the WEGs across the state) for the WEGs are as listed below for your reference.
Sl. Date of H.T. S.C.

No Companies Capacity Commissioning Location No.
of WEGs
1 Nelsun Paper 0.750 29.09.2004 Tenkasi 956
2 Ganga Mills 0.750 26.02.2005 Tenkasi 1122
3 Thiruvettai Ayyanar 0.750 07.01.2005 Tenkasi 1059
4 VMD Mills 0.750 25.01.2005 Tenkasi 1064
A.P. Dhandapani 0.750 26.03.2005 Tenkasi 1202
5 Sudamani 0.750 22.03.2005 Surandai 1161
6 Morvi Exports 0.750 21.03.2005 Surandai 1160
7 Naga 0.750 30.03.2004 Ayikudi 773
Aurofood 0.750 12.08.2005 Surandai 1357
8
Aurofood 0.750 12.08.2005 Surandai 1358
KP Textiles 0.750 06.01.2005 Tenkasi 1056
9 KP Textiles 0.750 06.01.2005 Tenkasi 1057
KP Textiles 0.750 06.01.2005 Tenkasi 1058
10 Gangai Garments 0.750 26.03.2005 Tenkasi 1199
SKM Animal Feed 0.750 12.08.2005 Tenkasi 1361
11
SKM Animal Feed 0.750 17.08.2005 Tenkasi 1363
A.4. Technical description of the small-scale project activity:

>>
The project involves the installation of 750 kW Wind Electric Generators of NEG Micon. The
WEGs are ideal for Indian meteorological conditions. The NM 48/750 kW WEG with a rated output of
750 kW is one of the machines well known for its best performance. The NM 48/750 kW WEG is a stall
regulated machine with a cut-in speed of 4 m/s and a cut-out speed of 25 m/s.
The NM 48/750 kW machine is type tested and certified by DNV, Denmark A/S. The technical
design of the WEGs is from NEG Micon A/S, Denmark where a dedicated team of professionals are
actively involved in design and testing. NEG Micon (I) Private Limited has been effective in technology
transfer. NEG Micon (I) Private Limited has setup manufacturing plants in Chennai and Pondicherry. The
technical specifications of the WEGs are as mentioned in Table 1.
Parameters NM 48/750 Parameters NM 48/750

Sl No Sl No
1 Operational Data 5 Generator
Nominal Output 750 KW Type Asynchronous
Power Regulation Stall Nominal Voltage 690 V
Cut-In Speed 4 m/s Nominal Frequency 50 Hz
Cut-Out Speed 25 m/s Name Plate Rating 750/200 KW
2 Rotor Cooling Closed circuit liquid cooling
Rotor Diameter 48.2 m 6 Yaw
2
Rotor Swept Area 1824 cm Type Ball Bearing
Number of Blades 3 nos. Drive Mechanism 4 electrical planetary gears
3 Brake System 7 Tower
Blade tip Air Brake Hydraulic, fail safe Type Conical, Steel, PU Painted
Disc Brake Hydraulic Hub Height According to type approvals
4 Drive Train 8 Controller
Gear type Planetary - parallel axle Type Computer controlling
Ratio 1:67.5 - 50Hz Capacitor Bank NO LOAD Compensated
Main Shaft High quality forged shaft
Main Bearing Spherical roller bearing
Cooling Closed circiut liquid cooling
(Table 1: Technical Specifications of NM 48/750 kW WEG)
A.4.1. Location of the small-scale project activity:

>>
India
A.4.1.1. Host Party(ies):
>>
Government of India
A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.:
>>
Tamilnadu
A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community etc:
>>
Tenkasi
A.4.1.4. Detail of physical location, including information allowing the unique identification of this
small-scale project activity(ies):
>>
The project site falls within latitudes N 88o 40’ and N 98o 12’ and longitudes E 77o 08’ and E 77o
58’, Figure 1 shows a map of the project site. The location where the project activity has been carried out
is uncultivable barren and wasteland. The nearest town Tenkasi is about 15 km away from the project site.
The unique identification of the project is the High Tension Service Connection Number (H.T.S.C. No.)
of the turbines in the project bundle.
Tenkasi Wind Farm
(Figure 1: Location map of the 12 MW Bundled Wind Power Project in Tenkasi)
A.4.2. Type and category and technology of the small-scale project activity:
>>
Since, the capacity of the proposed project is only 12 MW, which is less than the maximum
qualifying capacity of 15MW, the project activity has been considered as a small scale CDM project
activity and UNFCCC indicative simplified modalities and procedures are applied. The project activity
utilizes the wind potential for power generation and exports the generated electricity to the grid.
According to small-scale CDM modalities the project activity falls under:
Scope – 1 : Energy Industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)

Type – 1 : Renewable Energy Projects
Category I – D : Renewable Electricity Generation for a grid
A.4.3. Brief explanation of how the anthropogenic emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse gas
(GHGs) by sources are to be reduced by the proposed small-scale project activity, including why
the emission reductions would not occur in the absence of the proposed small-scale project activity,
taking into account national and/or sectoral policies and circumstances:
>>
A thorough analysis of the power sector in Southern Region grid of India is essential to
understand the greenhouse gas emission reductions achievable from the project activity.
The registered peak demand of the Southern Regional grid during 2004 - 2005 was 22364 MW
indicating an increase of 1.99 % over the previous year. The unrestricted maximum demand was 22717
MW, the overall capacity shortage in the region was of the order of 0.62 % to 6.43 % during the year
2004-05. The maximum monthly capacity shortages were of the order of 0.12 % to 5.08 % in Andhra
Pradesh, 0.25 % to 13.26 % in Karnataka, 4.64 % to 4.90 % in Kerala and 0.4 % to 2.74 % in Tamilnadu.
The installed capacity of Southern Region at the end of financial year 2004-05 was
31876.15 MW. The total installed capacity comprises Hydro- 10707.47 MW (33.59 %), Thermal+ Gas+
Diesel- 17662.19 MW (55.41 %), Nuclear- 830 MW (2.60 %) and Wind+ R.E.S- 2676.49 MW (8.40 %).
There was an increase of 6.58 % in the installed capacity over the previous year through addition of
1969.23 MW in Southern Region. The Hydro Thermal ratio was 38:62 as on 31.03.2005. (Source: CEA –
Southern Regional Electricity Board – Bangalore. Annual Report 2004-05).
As it can be observed, the project activity has contributed an additional sustainable clean
generation source to the regional grid thereby reducing the dependency on fossil fuel by a small but
significant extent. As on date there has been no regulation either from the State Government or Central
Government on the generation sources. No policy from the Governments mandates the promotion or
implementation of renewable energy projects. Still the activity has been carried out by the project entities.
The project will generate electricity from WEGs in the State of Tamilnadu. The project activity
has been essentially conceived for selling the generated output to the state electricity utility. Hence the
wind power generated from the project site will be replacing the electricity generated from thermal power
stations feeding into regional grid (during power surplus time). Since wind power is free from GHG
emissions, the power generated will save the anthropogenic green house gas (GHG) emissions that would
have been generated by the fossil fuel based thermal power stations comprising coal, diesel, furnace oil
and gas. The estimation of GHG reductions by this project is limited to carbon-dioxide only.
A.4.3.1 Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:
>>
The project activity is expected to reduce 22552.2 tonnes of CO2 annually. Projections have been
made assuming that the project will get registered in the year 2007.
Years Annual Estimate of emission reductions in tonnes of CO2 e

2007 22552.2
2008 22552.2
2009 22552.2
2010 22552.2
2011 22552.2
2012 22552.2
2013 22552.2
2014 22552.2
2015 22552.2
2016 22552.2
Total Estimated Emission Reductions 225522
(tonnes of CO2e)
Total Number of crediting years 10 years
Annual Average over the crediting
period of estimated reductions 22552.2
(tonnes of CO2e)
A.4.4. Public funding of the small-scale project activity:

>>
There is no public funding involved in this project activity.
A.4.5. Confirmation that the small-scale project activity is not a debundled component of a larger
project activity:
>>
According to paragraph 2 of Appendix C to the Simplified Modalities and Procedures for Small-
Scale CDM project activities (FCCC/CP/2002/7/Add.3), a small-scale project is considered a debundled
component of a large project activity if there is a registered small-scale activity or an application to
register another small-scale activity:
• With the same project participants
• In the same project category and technology; and
• Registered within the previous two years; and
• Whose project boundary is within 1km of the project boundary of the proposed small scale
activity
None of the above applies to 12 MW Bundled Wind Power Project at Tenkasi and the project
participants have not registered or applied for registration of another small scale wind project. Therefore
the proposed project is not a debundled component of a larger CDM project activity.
SECTION B. Application of a baseline methodology:
B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline methodology applied to the small-scale project
activity:
>>
The methodology followed will be “Renewable electricity generation for a grid - AMS 1 D”.
Version 9 Scope 1 (28 July 2006)
B.2 Project category applicable to the small-scale project activity:
>>
Technology/measure
(As per “Renewable electricity generation for a grid - AMS 1.D” Version 9 Scope 1)
1. This category comprises renewable energy generation units, such as photovoltaics, hydro,
tidal/wave, wind, geothermal, and renewable biomass, that supply electricity to and/or displace
electricity from an electricity distribution system that is or would have been supplied by at least
one fossil fuel fired generating unit.
2. If the unit added has both renewable and non-renewable components (e.g. a wind/diesel unit), the
eligibility limit of 15MW for a small-scale CDM project activity applies only to the renewable
component. If the unit added co-fires fossil fuel, the capacity of the entire unit shall not exceed
the limit of 15MW.
3. Biomass combined heat and power (co-generation) systems that supply electricity to and/or
displace electricity from a grid are included in this category. To qualify under this category, the
sum of all forms of energy output shall not exceed 45 MW thermal. E.g., for a biomass based co-
generating system the rating for all the boilers combined shall not exceed 45 MW thermal.
4. Project activities adding renewable energy capacity should consider the following cases:
a. Adding new units;
b. Replacing old units for more efficient units.
To qualify as a small scale CDM project activity, the aggregate installed capacity after
adding the new units (case a.) or of the more efficient units (case b.) should be lower than
15 MW.
5. Project activities that seek to retrofit or modify an existing facility for renewable energy
generation are included in this category. To qualify as a small scale project, the total output of the
modified or retrofitted unit shall not exceed the limit of 15 MW.
This project activity qualifies as per Section 1, which includes renewable energy generation units,
such as Wind.
B.3. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those
that would have occurred in the absence of the registered small-scale CDM project activity:
>>
The additionality of the 12MW bundled Wind Power Project in Tenkasi is established primarily
on the basis of a detailed Investment Analysis along with a more in-depth discussion on barrier analysis,
relating to the Project itself as well as within the scope of the Southern Regional Grid.
Investment Analysis
For the purpose of the investment analysis the prime financial indicator that has been used is the
IRR of the project activity. The Internal Rate of Return of any investment activity is one of the most
commonly used tools to establish the viability and the financial feasibility of the project. The benchmark
Internal Rate of Return (Equity IRR) of any project in the power sector in India is around 16%. Taking all
this into account the investment analysis was carried out taking the following assumptions into
consideration.
Assumptions for Investment Analysis
Size of Project 12 MW
No. of WEGs 16
Capacity of each WEG 0.750 kW
Generation per WEG 1,884,375 units
Plant Load Factor 28.6%
Life of WEG 20 yrs
Total project cost INR. 488,152,000/-
Wheeling charges 5%
O&M Cost as an % of the total Project Cost 1.45%
Escalation on O&M cost 7.19%
Insurance cost 0.37%
Interest on loan 8.25%
Sale to Board INR 2.70/-
Buy-back rate
Captive INR 3.50/-
Escalation on buy-back 0%
Income tax rate 36.6% (Including Sur Charge)
MAT 7.85%
Accelerated Depreciation 80%
Considering the above mentioned assumptions over a period of 20 years, without considering the
CDM revenues the Project IRR is 12.00% and the Equity IRR is 13.88%. When the revenues from CDM
are considered the Project IRR improves to 13.37% and the Equity IRR to 16.17%. The project cash flow
detailing the calculation and assumptions are approved by an external auditor and are submitted for the
reference of the DOE and is attached in Appendix 2.
Barriers and additionality

In this case, we establish that significant barriers exist and would have prevented the Project from
being undertaken or completed and also establish that the CDM activity would act as an impetus for this
Project to survive. The primary relevant barriers to the project activity are:
1. Investment barriers
1. Lowering of tax benefits and the introduction of the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT)
2. Reduction in tax concessions enacted by the Union Government led to corresponding reduction in
tax benefits to investors to put in wind farms
3. Disproportionate hike in interest rates subsequently imposed by IREDA for loans to set up wind
farms
4. Applying wind-speed data from limited number of anemometer resulted in wide variation from
predicted wind turbine generation and actual generation creating doubts about the viability of
wind projects
The financial indicator is the Equity IRR. The IRR has been computed for the entire lifetime of the
project activity.
2. Technological barriers
The non-availability of cost-effective, commercially viable technology for utilisation of wind
energy constitutes one of the major barriers to the project activity. Moreover the project activity
comprises of installation of NM 48 class of WEGs which has over 60% of the components imported
making the technology barrier more relevant for this project activity.
3. Institutional and Regulatory Barriers

The main institutional and regulatory barriers faced by the Project activity are listed below:
1. Delay in sanctioning by the SEBs and other State agencies
2. Unplanned addition of wind farms at sites like Muppandal, Kayathar, Poolavadi, etc., which
resulted in inadequate capacity at dedicated substations resulted in shutting down of wind
turbines even during peak wind speed periods with loss of generation and hence revenue loss to
the Wind farm owners.
3. Connecting WEGs to weak and rural feeder lines in the absence of dedicated substations at some
wind farm sites, poor grid, poor generation and loss of revenue
4. TNEB imposing penalties for excess Reactive Power (RkVAh) consumption
5. Absence of third party sale coupled with uncertainty about the tariff structure, inconsistent
contractual agreements like the PPA and their enforceability.
6. Inadequate power evacuation facilities by SEBs in many areas, along with inadequate capacity of
substations
4. Tariff Barriers
The Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources, Government of India had issued guidelines
for power purchase tariff to be Rs.2.25 per kWh with 5 % escalation every year for all renewable energy
to promote generation of renewable clean energy in the year 1996. TNEB followed the same guidelines
until the year 2001. In 2001, however TNEB changed its policy and froze the power purchase tariff for
wind energy at Rs.2.70 per kWh with no escalation till 2006 and had informed that this power purchase
tariff will be reviewed at 2006 and a new tariff will be fixed then. This figure was arrived by escalating
the base tariff of Rs.2.25 by 5% over a term of 5 years from 1996 – 2001. The price being paid for wind
energy is one of the lowest in the country at Rs.2.70 with no escalation. This is much lower than what
some of the other States are paying for wind power. The tariff has only changed marginally over the last
couple of years and third party sale is also not permitted in the state of Tamilnadu. Whereas the power
purchase tariff from Industrial Waste/Municipal Waste based generation is at Rs.3.49 in the year 2005
against wind power being paid just Rs.2.70.
5. Transaction barriers
Transaction barriers to wind energy are similar in many ways to those in developed and
developing countries. In India many of the sources of risk, institutional structures and conditions,
experience and skills deficiencies are unique. The result is greater uncertainty in transactions about
opportunities, costs and benefits.
Impact of CDM registration

Registering the project activity as a CDM project expected after approval and registration, would
provide additional revenue to the project activity improving the cash flows. The financial viability of the
project activity would improve with CER revenues. The CDM revenues will assist the investor in
realizing returns commensurate the risks in development and operations of the project. In addition to the
investment barriers already faced, the project proponent is also bearing the additional transaction costs for
CDM project by taking a pro-active approach in showing confidence in the Kyoto Protocol/CDM
mechanism.
B.4. Description of how the definition of the project boundary related to the baseline methodology
selected is applied to the small-scale project activity:
>>
The project boundary is defined as the notional margin around a project within which the
project’s impact (in terms of GHG reduction) will be assessed. According to ACM0002/Version
06/Sectoral Scope (19 May 2006) the spatial extent of this project activity includes the project site and all
the power plants connected physically to the electricity system that the CDM power project is connected
to. Thus, it is essentially the zone encompassing the WEG installations to the nearest grid interconnection
point.
There are three choices available for choosing the grid system for the project activity, viz.
national grid, regional grid or state grid. Since the CDM project would be supplying electricity to the
southern regional grid it is preferable to take the regional grid as project boundary than the state boundary.
It also minimizes the effect of inter state power transactions, which are dynamic and vary widely.
Considering free flow of electricity among the member states and the union territory through the Southern
Region Load Dispatch Centre (SRLDC), the entire southern grid is considered as a single entity for
estimation of baseline.
B.5. Details of the baseline and its development:
>>
According to paragraph 9 of the AMS 1.D. Version 9 Scope 1 (28 July 2006) the baseline is the
kWh produced by the renewable generating unit multiplied by an emission coefficient (measured in kg
CO2equ/kWh) calculated in a transparent and conservative manner as:
a. A combined margin (CM), consisting of the combination of operating margin (OM) and build
margin (BM) according to the procedures prescribed in the approved methodology ACM0002.
Any of the four procedures to calculate the operating margin can be chosen, but the restrictions to
use the Simple OM and the Average OM calculations must be considered
OR
b. The weighted average emissions (in kg CO2equ/kWh) of the current generation mix. The data of
the year in which project generation occurs must be used.
Step (a.) was followed to arrive at the emission factor. The formulae that have been used in the
calculations are presented in Section E.1. Data required for the calculations were collected from
appropriate sources, a sample of which is presented below.
COEF i, j for various fuels used in the State was calculated using appropriate values of NCVi, EF
and OXIDi specified by IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference
CO2i
Manual, Revised 1996.
Fuel consumption data and Generation details for all the sources were collected and used to arrive
at the Baseline emission factor. The various values obtained are tabulated as below.
Calculation of Combined Margin Emission Factor
Parameter 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

Gross
Generation 128,796 131,747 136,742 138,153 143,932
Total (In GWh)
Net Generation
120,964 123,468 127,617 128,032 134,551
Total (In GWh)
20% of Net
Generation (In 24,193 24,694 25,523 25,606 26,910
GWh)
Absolute
Emissions 87,815,363 91,590,959 103,269,937 107,406,076 104,917,425
Total (tCO2)
Absolute
Emissions OM 87,815,363 91,590,959 103,269,937 107,406,076 104,917,425
(tCO2)
Absolute
Emissions BM 19,332,594
(tCO2)
Simple
Operating
1.02 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Margin (tCO2/
MWh)
Build Margin
0.71
(tCO2/ MWh)
Combined
margin incl.
0.86 0.85 0.85 0.86 0.85
Imports (tCO2/
MWh)
The data is obtained from CO2 Baseline Database for the Indian Power Sector (User Guide Draft
V1.0 dated 4 Oct 2006) which was designed especially for the purpose of baseline calculation. The
various plants and the assumptions considered in the calculation are given in the link
http://www.cea.nic.in/planning/c%20and%20e/CO2%20Database.zip. However the list of plants
considered for baseline study is tabulated in Appendix 1.
SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / Crediting period:
C.1. Duration of the small-scale project activity:

>>
10 years
C.1.1. Starting date of the small-scale project activity:
>>
30/03/2004 (DD/MM/YYYY) commissioning date of first WEG in the bundle
C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the small-scale project activity:
>>
20 years
C.2. Choice of crediting period and related information:
>>
C.2.1. Renewable crediting period:
>>
C.2.1.1. Starting date of the first crediting period:
>>
C.2.1.2. Length of the first crediting period:
>>
C.2.2. Fixed crediting period:
>>
C.2.2.1. Starting date:
>>
18/01/2007 (DD/MM/YYYY)
C.2.2.2. Length:
>>
10 years
SECTION D. Application of a monitoring methodology and plan:
D.1. Name and reference of approved monitoring methodology applied to the small-scale project
activity:
>>
“Renewable electricity generation for a grid” AMS 1.D. Version 9 Scope 1 (28 July 2006)
D.2. Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the small-scale
project activity:
>>
The project activity meets the eligibility criteria to use simplified modalities and
procedure for small-scale CDM project activities as set out in paragraph 6 (c) of decision
17/CP.7.
D.3 Data to be monitored:

>>
ID Data type Data Data Measured Recording Proportion How will For how Comment
No. variable unit (m), frequency of data to be the data be long is
calculated monitored archived? archived
(c) or (electronic/ data to
estimated (e) paper) be kept?
1 Electricity Electricity kWh M Monthly 100% Electronic & Two Electricity

supplied to Paper years generated
the beyond from each
regional Crediting WEG is
electricity period individually
grid measured.
D.4. Qualitative explanation of how quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures
are undertaken:
>>
ID Uncertainty level of Explain QA/QC procedures planned for these data, or why such
number data procedures are not necessary.
(High/Medium/Low)
1 Low The data can be very accurately measured. The meters installed on
sub stations (grid interconnection point) will be used to measure
mentioned variables on a continuous basis. Every month these meter
readings will be recorded by plant personnel, these records will be
archived for crosschecking yearly figures. The meters at the sub
station will be two-way meters and will be in custody of SEB
(TNEB). SEB will take the readings in these meters and the same
reading may be used to determine the net power wheeled to the grid
and determine the extent of mitigation of GHG over a period of time.
D.5. Please describe briefly the operational and management structure that the project
participant(s) will implement in order to monitor emission reductions and any leakage effects
generated by the project activity:
>>
NEG Micon (I) Private Limited has certifications from ISO on Quality Management Systems,
Environmental Management Systems and Occupational Health and Safety. NEG Micon (I) Private
Limited follows standard documented best practices at all stage of its activities, from project
identification to wind resource assessment, marketing to commissioning and during the entire lifetime of
the WEGs within the operation and maintenance period. Each project executed by NEG Micon (I) Private
Limited involves an Operations and Maintenance Agreement that is signed with the project promoter.
NEG Micon (I) Private Ltd also has adequate and technically qualified site managers to ensure constant
monitoring of wind turbines installed. In addition, NEG Micon (I) Private Ltd has prepared a ‘CDM
Manual’ that will facilitate easy monitoring of the project activity. The annual electricity generation from
these turbines can be accessed from www.power2customer.com
D.6. Name of person/entity determining the monitoring methodology:

>>
Carbon Advisory Services of NEG Micon (I) Private Limited. The contact information is
provided in Annex 1.
SECTION E.: Estimation of GHG emissions by sources:
E.1. Formulae used:

>>
Appendix B of the Simplified modalities and procedures for small scale CDM projects activities
recommends the use of the average of the “approximate operating margin” and the combined margin,
calculated in a transparent and conservative manner, in estimating the emission coefficient. The baseline
is the kWh produced by the renewable generating unit multiplied by the emission coefficient( measured in
kg CO2eq / kWh).
The operating margin emission factor is calculated as:

∑ i,j Fi,j,y . COEF i, j
EF OM,, y = ---------------------------
∑ Gen j, y
The build margin emission factor is calculated as:

∑ i,j Fi,j,y . COEF i, j
EF BM, y = ----------------------------
∑ Gen j, y
Average emission factor is calculated as:

(EFOM,y + EFBM,y)
EFy = ---------------------
2
E.1.1 Selected formulae as provided in appendix B:
>>
No formula is provided in Appendix B for these types of projects.
E.1.2 Description of formulae when not provided in appendix B:
>>
F i, j, y is the amount of fuel i consumed by relevant power sources j in year(s) y, j refers
to the power sources delivering electricity to the grid,
COEF i, j y is the CO2 emission coefficient of fuel i (tCO2 / mass or volume unit of the fuel),
taking into account the carbon content of the fuels used by relevant power
sources j and the percent oxidation of the fuel in year(s) y, and
GEN j, y is the electricity (MWh) delivered to the grid by source j.
The CO2 emission coefficient COEF i is obtained as

COEF i = NCVi ⊗ EFCO2,i ⊗ OXIDi
Where,
NCV i is the net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel i,
OXID i is the oxidation factor of the fuel (see page 1.29 in the 1996 Revised IPCC
Guidelines for default values)
EF CO2, i is the CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i.
EFOM,y is the operating margin emission factor
EFBM,y is the build margin emission factor

EFy is the average baseline emission factor
E.1.2.1 Describe the formulae used to estimate anthropogenic emissions by sources of GHGs due to
the project activity within the project boundary:
>>
The project activity is a wind based power generation project with no emissions. Hence there is
no relevance to this section.
E.1.2.2 Describe the formulae used to estimate leakage due to the project activity, where required,
for the applicable project category in appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for
small-scale CDM project activities
>>
The project activity is a wind based power generation project with no emissions. Hence there is
no relevance to this section.
E.1.2.3 The sum of E.1.2.1 and E.1.2.2 represents the small-scale project activity emissions:
>>
The project activity emissions are zero.
E.1.2.4 Describe the formulae used to estimate the anthropogenic emissions by sources of GHGs in
the baseline using the baseline methodology for the applicable project category in appendix B of the
simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities:
>>
BEy = EGy ⊗ EFy
Where,
EFy is the baseline emission factor for the year y
EGy is the electricity generation for the year y
E.1.2.5 Difference between E.1.2.4 and E.1.2.3 represents the emission reductions due to the project
activity during a given period:
>>
225522 tonnes of CO2e for the ten years crediting period.
E.2 Table providing values obtained when applying formulae above:
>>
Year Estimation of Estimation of baseline Estimation Estimation of
project activity activity emission of leakage emission reductions
emissions ( tCO2e) reductions ( tCO2e) ( tCO2e) ( tCO2e)
2007 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
2008 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
2009 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
2010 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
2011 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
2012 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
2013 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
2014 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
2015 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
2016 0 22552.2 0 22552.2
Total tonnes of CO2e 0 225522 0 225522
SECTION F.: Environmental impacts:
F.1. If required by the host Party, documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of
the project activity:
>>
Wind power is one of the cleanest sources of renewable energy, with no associated emissions and
waste products. In India, wind power projects do not require an Environmental Impact Assessment;
however some of the significant impacts are discussed below:
Land use
Extremely stringent measures are taken to ensure that the land available for wind farm
development has no alternative use. The land for the Tenkasi Wind Project was barren land which could
not be used for any agricultural cultivation. Furthermore, no forest land was used for the purpose.
Noise pollution
Most of the wind turbines are in isolated areas or on designated wind zones and hence do not
cause residents of the area any concern. In the same vein, construction activities so far also have not
caused noise pollution due to the isolated nature of the area and actually only has a positive impact of
producing employment for the village people in nearby areas.
Water pollution
No water bodies exist in the area of the Project and hence there was no contamination destruction
of water bodies during and after the construction activities.
Flora and fauna

As mentioned above, the land used for the purpose was barren land and no flora was destroyed
for the setting up of the project. The only vegetation in the area of the project was shrubs and weeds,
which grow abundantly. Further, many wind farm investors are actually using the land around the wind
machines to grow aloe vera and other xerophytes that require little or no water. This is proving to have a
good environmental impact on the area.
Bird hit in these areas is not a common phenomenon. The Tenkasi Wind Project is not in the path
of migratory birds. Local birds are accustomed to the wind structures and fly at a lower level near areas of
dense vegetation. There have been no serious incidents involving birds and wind turbines in the area to
the best of our knowledge.
Visual impact
As gathered in the stakeholder analysis, the presence of the wind farms does not have a negative
impact on the surrounding villagers in terms of visual impact. The majority of the persons spoken to were
least concerned of the wind farms in the area.
Air pollution
Minimal air pollution might have occurred during the construction of the Project due to
transportation. However, these were not found to affect the surrounding persons nor the environment in a
very drastic manner.
Social Impacts
The social impacts of the Project were more positive than negative. The Project did not displace
any people nor interfere in their daily life. It provided employment for the first 6 months prior to
installation and then for a lesser number of people on a day to day basis. The Project has also had positive
impacts since infrastructure like roads and communication was developed in the area.
SECTION G. Stakeholders’ comments:
G.1. Brief description of how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled:
>>
The WEG installation and development of wind farm does not require any EIA (Environmental
Impact Assessment). Additionally the installations carried out under the proposed project activity are
away from human habitation, and the land used for installations of WEG is of no use (barren land).
The villages in the near vicinity were contacted before the implementation of the proposed
project activity, and were appraised about the execution of wind farm project. The local stakeholders
raised no issues, thus no action was required.
The land used for installations has been kept without any fencing and thus no right-of-
way/current usage (what so ever) has been disturbed. The villagers are free to move around and make use
of the land (if it can come to any use).
G.2. Summary of the comments received:
>>
A survey was conducted in the area of the Tenkasi Wind Project in Tamilnadu. A subsequent
analysis was undertaken as a part of Validation as per the DOE’s request.
PHASE 1
Primary data was collected through questionnaires and focus group discussions. Responses were
tabulated on a Likert scale and then coded and classified to arrive at the final analysis. The stakeholders
were predominantly male and adult. It was observed that almost 95% were strongly in favour of the
Project. The rest 5% were concerned about certain rumors they had heard about wind mills which is
addressed below. Questions were made simple and easy to understand. A number of pictures and graphics
were also taken as part of the interview to make the respondents understand better. The orientation and
questionnaire addressed the following:
1. Project introduction
2. Reasons for setting up the Project
3. Costs and benefits of setting up the Project
4. How did they think it would affect them?
5. Do they perceive that the Project will have negative or positive impacts on their livelihood?
6. Are they bothered about the noise pollution?
7. Have there been any difficulties faced during construction?
8. What are some of the other issues that concern them?
9. Do they have any other suggestions or queries?
The survey had a 90% response rate. The reason for this high response rate was the fact that the
local Panchayat was involved in mobilizing people for this survey. The respondents felt confident that the
local municipal body was involved.
1. Most respondents were farmers with no education at all.

2. 80% of the respondents felt that the Project did not have any negative impacts on their livelihood.
3. Almost 88% felt that the Project actually benefited them through employment
4. 100% of respondents agreed with the development of the Project
5. The main issue that concerned them was a perception that wind mills moved away rain clouds
(almost 82.7%) and women in the group were concerned that the windmills were creating a lot of
heat which depleted the groundwater sources. This concern was understandable since it is
invariably women who travel long distances to fetch water. Further around 10% of the respondent
group were concerned about blades falling.
6. No additional comments were received.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that there was no opposition to the setting up of the Project. In summary:
(1) The issues discussed were well understood and the local stakeholders did not have any issues
with the Project being in the area. They well understood the fact that it would not interfere with
their village and community.
(2) However some perceptions were interesting to note. The villagers felt that the presence of the
wind turbines moved away rain clouds and that was the reason the monsoons were not bringing in
any rain to the area and causing crop failure. Further, they had heard that wind mills increased the
heat in the neighboring areas. Both these false perceptions were explained in detail by us,
especially the fact the clouds are much higher than the height of the wind mill and it is highly
unlikely that it would cause the problem. Further the case was made stronger by cross checking
this information with the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology and the Center for Wind
Energy Technology. The women in the group who traversed long distances to fetch water for
daily activities were concerned that the wind mills created a lot of heat and were depleting
groundwater sources. All these perceptions were explained and the respondent group was
convinced.
(3) Falling blades although not witnessed, but heard of was another concern. We explained that this
is very unlikely and since the windmills are located far from the community and houses it would
not affect them directly. However, their concerns were noted.
There were no specific negative comments. There were some apprehensions based on
misconceptions rather than actual facts but were cleared. Since there were no negative comments, there
were no changes to Project activity. Thus no serious concerns or issues were raised regarding the Project.
PHASE 2
To re-ascertain the views of local public about setting up of WEGs in their localities another
stake holder’s analysis was conducted during the validation of this project on the 20th of February at the
Wind Farms in the Tenkasi district of Tamilnadu, Southern India.
The meet with the stake holders saw a good gathering of people who were residents of Ayakudi,
Surandai, Keelveeranam, Veeranam, Pattakurichi and Sambavarvadakkarai. There was an active
participation from both male as well as female.
A flyer stating that an analysis of this kind will be carried out at the site on the aforesaid date was
circulated by the service site people well in advance, so that they could make it convenient to attend the
meet.
A questionnaire was circulated and the contents of the same were explained as most of them who had
attended were illiterate.
All the people who had attended the meet were happy about people setting up wind mills in their
villages, as most of the farmers who had suffered due to bad harvest are happy that now they have sold
out their lands for good prices to the people setting up the wind mills. Moreover in most of the cases they
have also been provided with employment opportunities. For example: few of the old farmers are now
working as watchmen in the wind farm site and people are also being employed to paint the tower
structures. Also young people with the minimum qualification have been trained and absorbed as
operators for the turbines. This has clearly led to an increase in awareness among the people residing
around the area.
People who attended the meet said there is a drastic change in their lifestyle post setting up of
wind turbines in their locality. Apart from the convenience in communication a lot of shops have also
come up in the area which caters to their daily needs. A few of the advantages stated by the people are
listed below –
• Fewer or no Power Shutdowns
• Increased employment opportunities
• Improvement in the standard of living
• Improved roads and hence better communication facilities
The following is a summary of the major questions addressed in the questionnaire and the response
from the stakeholders:
Questionnaire Stakeholders Responses

Has the installation of the windmills The stakeholders did not identify any significant demerits of
marked any positive / negative impact wind mill installations. However two major positive effects
on the livelihood of the local people? identified were:
Improvement in the roads and other communication in
that area
Employment opportunities for the local population
Have the local people felt any problem There is no noise nuisance as windmills are on hilltops and are
due to the noise from the windmills? far away from the villages.
Has there been any water related The local people did not identify any scarcity or other problems
problem due to the windmills? regarding water availability due to the windmills. However, it
was mentioned that there was a riot somewhere in Maharashtra
due to lack of rains three years back, but nothing of that sort
had happened here.
What were the major issues that The stakeholders admit that there had been a few
concern the local people? misconceptions initially regarding the consequences of setting
up windmills. But they are now quite aware and have realized
that there are no significant disadvantages due to the same. A
few of those issues were:
Moving rain clouds due to the windmills
Too much heat generated from the windmills
G.3. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:
>>
The issues discussed were well understood and the local stakeholders did not have any issues
with the Project being in the area. They well understood the fact that it would not interfere with their
village and community. However some of the earlier perceptions (Phase I) were interesting to note. The
villagers felt that the presence of the wind turbines moved away rain clouds that might cause a disruption
of the monsoon season. Further, they had heard that wind mills increased the heat in the neighboring
areas. Both these false perceptions were explained in detail by us, especially the fact that the clouds are at
a much higher altitude than the height of the wind mill and it is highly unlikely that it would cause the
problem. Further, information from the Center for Wind Energy Technology based in Chennai also
conveyed the same.
They also wanted to know why the Project could not directly supply their village instead of
having to depend on the grid. Some of the villagers from a neighboring village which was off the grid
were also keen on this issue. It had to be explained that wind mills supply much more power than what
can be used by the villagers for their domestic use, which would result in considerable power wastage,
Furthermore, the buy back rates for wind power in the State is at Rs.2.70 without any escalation, which
would be unaffordable for the villagers who are receiving power at subsidized rates. Once the wind power
is fed into the grid, it is impossible to distinguish which is wind power and hence would make no
difference apart from the fact that they would be dependent on the grid again. The concept of
transmission and distribution of electricity was explained to them to help them understand how and why it
would not be suitable for the villagers to utilize the power from WEGs for their daily domestic
consumptions.
Annex 1
CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
Organization: NEG Micon (I) Private Limited

Street/P.O.Box: 298, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Sholinganallur,
Building:
City: Chennai
State/Region: Tamil Nadu
Postfix/ZIP: 600 119
Country: India
Telephone: + 91 44 2450 5100
FAX: + 91 44 2450 5101
E-Mail:
URL: www.neg-micon.com
Represented by: Carbon Advisory Services
Title:
Salutation:
Last Name:
Middle Name:
First Name:
Department:
Mobile:
Direct FAX: + 91 44 2450 5101
Direct tel: + 91 44 2450 5044
Personal E-Mail: pratan@india.neg-micon.com
Annex 2
INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING
There is no public funding involved in this project activity

Appendix 1
BASELINE INFORMATION – Southern Region Electricity Board Grid
S. Name Unit-no Capacity Type Fuel 2000-01 2000-01 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05
MW
NO As on Net in Net in Net in Net in Net in in
31STMar Generation Operating Generatio Operating Generation Operating Generation Operating Generation Operating Build
2005 GWh Margin n Margin GWh Margin GWh Margin GWh Margin Margin
GWh
1 K_GUDEM 0 680 THERMAL COAL 3,482 1 3,769 1 4,210 1 3,833 1 4,919 1

1 K_GUDEM 1 60 THERMAL COAL
2 K_GUDEM NEW 0 500 THERMAL COAL 3,466 1 3,535 1 3,734 1 3,689 1 3,770 1
2 K_GUDEM NEW 1 250 THERMAL COAL
2 K_GUDEM NEW 2 250 THERMAL COAL
3 VIJAYWADA 0 1260 THERMAL COAL 9,317 1 9,346 1 9,382 1 9,247 1 8,926 1
3 VIJAYWADA 1 210 THERMAL COAL
4 R_GUNDEM - B 0 62.5 THERMAL COAL 405 1 387 1 352 1 431 1 449 1
4 R_GUNDEM - B 1 62.5 THERMAL COAL
5 RAYAL SEEMA 0 420 THERMAL COAL 3,123 1 3,068 1 3,120 1 3,045 1 3,078 1
5 RAYAL SEEMA 1 210 THERMAL COAL
5 RAYAL SEEMA 2 210 THERMAL COAL
6 VIJESWARAN GT 0 272.3 THERMAL GAS 1,928 1 1,905 1 1,978 1 2,093 1 1,940 1
6 VIJESWARAN GT 1 33 THERMAL GAS
6 VIJESWARAN GT 3 112.5 THERMAL GAS 255
6 VIJESWARAN GT 5 59.8 THERMAL GAS 412
7 R_GUNDEM STPS 0 2600 THERMAL COAL 15,433 1 14,693 1 15,748 1 14,766 1 16,038 1
7 R_GUNDEM STPS 1 200 THERMAL COAL
7 R_GUNDEM STPS 7 500 THERMAL COAL 488 1
8 SIMHADRI 0 1000 THERMAL COAL 1 0 1 4,576 1 7,027 1 7,663 1
8 SIMHADRI 1 500 THERMAL COAL 3,856 1
8 SIMHADRI 2 500 THERMAL COAL 3,806 1
9 JEGURUPADU GT 0 235.4 THERMAL GAS 1,625 1 1,575 1 1,555 1 1,476 1 1,392 1
9 JEGURUPADU GT 1 52.8 THERMAL GAS
9 JEGURUPADU GT 4 77 THERMAL GAS
10 GODAVARI GT 0 208 THERMAL GAS 1,544 1 1,458 1 1,160 1 1,090 1 1,344 1
10 GODAVARI GT 1 47 THERMAL GAS
11 KONDAPALLI GT 0 350 THERMAL GAS 659 1 1,683 1 2,403 1 2,171 1 2,179 1
11 KONDAPALLI GT 1 112 THERMAL GAS 0 1
12 LVS POWER DG 0 36.8 THERMAL DISL 0 1 90 1 2 1 0 1 0 1

12 LVS POWER DG 1 18.4 THERMAL DISL 0 1
12 LVS POWER DG 2 18.4 THERMAL DISL 0 1
13 PEDDAPURAM 0 220 THERMAL GAS 1 1 908 1 1,248 1 1,142 1
CCGT
PEDDAPURAM
13 CCGT 1 220 THERMAL GAS 908 1,142 1
14 RAICHUR 0 1470 THERMAL COAL 8,180 1 8,185 1 9,141 1 10,425 1 9,799 1
14 RAICHUR 1 210 THERMAL COAL
RAICHUR
14 3 210 THERMAL COAL
14 RAICHUR 5 210 THERMAL COAL 1,498
14 RAICHUR 6 210 THERMAL COAL 1,341 1
14 RAICHUR 7 210 THERMAL COAL 1,370 1
15 YELHANKA (DG) 0 127.92 THERMAL DISL 639 1 746 1 685 1 384 1 262 1
15 YELHANKA (DG) 1 21.32 THERMAL DISL
NUCLE
16 KAIGA 0 440 NUCLEAR AR 1,688 2,843 3,020 2,800 2,608
NUCLE
16 KAIGA 1 220 NUCLEAR AR 1,355 1
NUCLE
16 KAIGA 2 220 NUCLEAR AR 1,264 1
17 TORANGALLU IMP 0 260 THERMAL COAL 1,558 1 2,044 1 2,024 1 1,841 1 1,841 1
17 TORANGALLU IMP 1 130 THERMAL COAL 920 1
17 TORANGALLU IMP 2 130 THERMAL COAL 920 1
18 BELLARY DG 0 25.2 THERMAL DISL 13 1 181 1 62 1 41 1 39 1
18 BELLARY DG 1 25.2 THERMAL DISL 39 1
19 TANIR BAVI 0 220 THERMAL GAS 0 1 938 1 1,178 1 866 1 630 1
19 TANIR BAVI 1 42.5 THERMAL GAS 0 1

19 TANIR BAVI 5 50 THERMAL GAS 0 1
20 BELGAUM DG 0 81.3 THERMAL DISL 0 1 404 1 343 1 227 1 240 1
20 BELGAUM DG 1 27.1 THERMAL DISL 0 1
21 BRAMHAPURAM DG 0 106.5 THERMAL DISL 308 1 305 1 121 1 255 1 252 1
21 BRAMHAPURAM DG 1 106.5 THERMAL DISL
22 KOJIKODE DG 0 128 THERMAL DISL 443 1 282 1 374 1 298 1 152 1
22 KOJIKODE DG 1 128 THERMAL DISL 152 1
23 COCHIN CCGT 0 174 THERMAL NAPT 149 1 233 1 296 1 961 1 108 1
23 COCHIN CCGT 1 45 THERMAL NAPT 0 1
24 KASARGODE DG 0 21.9 THERMAL DISL 0 1 85 1 143 1 75 1 15 1
24 KASARGODE DG 1 21.9 THERMAL DISL 15 1
25 KAYAM KULAM GT 0 350 THERMAL GAS 1,887 1 1,291 1 2,058 1 2,054 1 602 1
25 KAYAM KULAM GT 1 115.3 THERMAL GAS 221
25 KAYAM KULAM GT 2 115.3 THERMAL GAS 160
25 KAYAM KULAM GT 3 119.4 THERMAL GAS 220 1
26 ENNORE 0 450 THERMAL COAL 638 1 970 1 1,517 1 1,087 1 1,041 1
26 ENNORE 1 60 THERMAL COAL
27 TUTICORIN 0 1050 THERMAL COAL 7,328 1 7,486 1 7,562 1 7,452 1 7,539 1
27 TUTICORIN 1 210 THERMAL COAL
28 METTUR 0 840 THERMAL COAL 5,902 1 5,884 1 6,208 1 6,208 1 6,128 1
28 METTUR 1 210 THERMAL COAL

29 NORTH CHENNAI 0 630 THERMAL COAL 3,949 1 4,259 1 4,001 1 3,951 1 3,560 1
29 NORTH CHENNAI 1 210 THERMAL COAL
30 BASIN BRIDGE GT 0 120 THERMAL NAPT 158 1 167 1 266 1 86 1 39 1
30 BASIN BRIDGE GT 1 30 THERMAL NAPT
31 VALUTHUR GT 0 94 THERMAL GAS 0 1 0 1 116 1 633 1 526 1
31 VALUTHUR GT 1 94 THERMAL GAS 526 1
32 KUTTALAM GT 0 100 THERMAL GAS 0 1 0 1 0 1 102 1 605 1
32 KUTTALAM GT 1 64 THERMAL GAS 387 1
32 KUTTALAM GT 2 36 THERMAL GAS 218 1
33 B. BRIDGE D.G 0 200 THERMAL DISL 1,236 1 1,193 1 1,167 1 957 1 763 1
33 B. BRIDGE D.G 1 50 THERMAL DISL 771
34 KOVILKALAPPAL 0 107 THERMAL GAS 35 1 659 1 686 1 680 1 717 1
34 KOVILKALAPPAL 1 107 THERMAL GAS 717 1
35 P.NALLUR CCGT 0 330.5 THERMAL GAS 0 1 1,015 1 2,103 1 1,293 1 462 1
35 P.NALLUR CCGT 1 330.5 THERMAL GAS 462 1
36 SAMALPATTI DG 0 105.7 THERMAL DISL 88 1 631 1 601 1 442 1 345 1
36 SAMALPATTI DG 1 105.7 THERMAL DISL 345 1
SAMAYANALLUR
37 DG 0 106 THERMAL DISL 0 1 241 1 568 1 339 1 369 1
37 SAMAYANALLUR DG 1 106 THERMAL DISL 369 1
KARUPPUR GT
38 (ABAN) 0 70 THERMAL GAS 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
38 KARUPPUR GT 1 70 THERMAL GAS 0 1
39 NEYVELI ST I 0 600 THERMAL LIGN 3,710 1 3,695 1 3,872 1 3,894 1 3,773 1

39 NEYVELI ST I 1 50 THERMAL LIGN
40 NEYVELI ST II 0 1470 THERMAL LIGN 9,498 1 9,304 1 9,488 1 9,052 1 8,344 1
40 NEYVELI ST II 1 210 THERMAL LIGN
41 NEYVELI FST EXT 0 420 THERMAL LIGN 0 1 0 1 0 1 1,877 1 2,945 1
41 NEYVELI FST EXT 1 210 THERMAL LIGN 1,500 1
41 NEYVELI FST EXT 2 210 THERMAL LIGN 1,444 1
42 NEYVELI TPS(Z) 0 250 THERMAL LIGN 0 1 0 1 321 1 1,405 1 1,246 1
42 NEYVELI TPS(Z) 1 250 THERMAL LIGN 1,220 1
NUCLE
43 M.A.P.P. 0 390 NUCLEAR AR 2,249 1,970 1,971 1,300 1,300
NUCLE
43 M.A.P.P. 1 170 NUCLEAR AR
NUCLE
43 M.A.P.P. 2 220 NUCLEAR AR
44 KARAIKAL 0 32.5 THERMAL GAS 221 1 236 1 250 1 260 1 260 1
44 KARAIKAL 1 32.5 THERMAL GAS 259 1
45 MACHKUND 0 114.75 HYDRO 666 725 576 526 895
45 MACHKUND 1 17 HYDRO
45 MACHKUND 4 21.25 HYDRO

46 UPPER SILERU I&II 0 240 HYDRO 436 447 244 399 541
46 UPPER SILERU-I 1 60 HYDRO
46 UPPER SILERU-I 2 60 HYDRO
46 UPPER SILERU-II 3 60 HYDRO
46 UPPER SILERU-II 4 60 HYDRO
47 LOWER SILERU 0 460 HYDRO 1,306 1,053 612 972 1,165
47 LOWER SILERU 1 115 HYDRO
NAGARJUNA
48 SAGAR 0 815.6 HYDRO 1,517 1,064 864 367 501
48 NAGARJUNA SAGAR 1 110 HYDRO
48 NAGARJUNA SAGAR 2 100.8 HYDRO
N_SAGAR RBC &
49 EXTN. 0 90 HYDRO 43 61 0 0 48
49 N_SAGAR RBC 1 30 HYDRO
49 N_SAGAR RBC 2 30 HYDRO
N_SAGAR RBC
49 EXTN. 3 30 HYDRO
50 N_SAGAR LBC 0 60 HYDRO 17 23 0 0 5
50 N_SAGAR LBC 1 30 HYDRO
50 N_SAGAR LBC 2 30 HYDRO
51 DONKARAYI 0 25 HYDRO 140 83 41 110 132
51 DONKARAYI 1 25 HYDRO
52 SRISAILAM 0 770 HYDRO 3,021 1,933 534 307 935
52 SRISAILAM 1 110 HYDRO

53 T.B. DAM 0 36 HYDRO 224 164 118 101 148
53 T.B. DAM 1 9 HYDRO
54 POCHAMPAD 0 27 HYDRO 126 103 81 64 0
54 POCHAMPAD 1 9 HYDRO
55 NIZAM SAGAR 0 10 HYDRO 29 3 0 6 0
55 NIZAM SAGAR 1 5 HYDRO
55 NIZAM SAGAR 2 5 HYDRO
56 PENNA AHOBELAM 0 20 HYDRO 66 14 0 0 0
56 PENNA AHOBELAM 1 10 HYDRO
56 PENNA AHOBELAM 2 10 HYDRO
57 SINGUR 0 15 HYDRO 88 4 7 6 1
57 SINGUR 1 7.5 HYDRO 0 1
57 SINGUR 2 7.5 HYDRO 0 1
58 SRISAILAM LBPH 0 900 HYDRO 0 379 555 326 1,404
58 SRISAILAM LBPH 1 150 HYDRO 234 1
59 SHARAVATHY 0 1006.2 HYDRO 5,207 4,195 2,935 3,299 3,836
59 SHARAVATHY 1 103.5 HYDRO

60 KALINADI 0 855 HYDRO 2,554 2,411 1,803 1,709 1,712
60 KALINADI 1 135 HYDRO
61 KALINADI SUPA 0 100 HYDRO 423 395 256 240 293
61 KALINADI SUPA 1 50 HYDRO
61 KALINADI SUPA 2 50 HYDRO
62 LIGANAMAKKI 0 55 HYDRO 274 176 110 119 193
62 LIGANAMAKKI 1 27.5 HYDRO
62 LIGANAMAKKI 2 27.5 HYDRO
63 VARAHI 0 230 HYDRO 1,095 896 840 717 968
63 VARAHI 1 115 HYDRO
63 VARAHI 2 115 HYDRO
64 BHADRA 0 39.2 HYDRO 107 41 18 11 43
64 BHADRA (L) 1 2 HYDRO
64 BHADRA ( R) 4 7.2 HYDRO
64 BHADRA (RBC) 5 6 HYDRO
65 GHAT PRABHA 0 32 HYDRO 86 73 59 62 96
65 GHAT PRABHA 1 16 HYDRO
65 GHAT PRABHA 2 16 HYDRO
66 MANI DPH 0 9 HYDRO 25 21 18 11 22
66 MANI DPH 1 4.5 HYDRO
66 MANI DPH 2 4.5 HYDRO

67 MALLARPUR 0 9 HYDRO 25 8 1 0 0
67 MALLARPUR 1 4.5 HYDRO
67 MALLARPUR 2 4.5 HYDRO
SHARAVATHY TAIL
68 RACE 0 240 HYDRO 42 411 296 356 435
SHARAVATHY TAIL
68 RACE 1 60 HYDRO 109 1
SHARAVATHY TAIL
68 RACE 2 60 HYDRO 109 1
SHARAVATHY TAIL
68 RACE 3 60 HYDRO 109 1
SHARAVATHY TAIL
68 RACE 4 60 HYDRO 109 1
69 KADRA 0 150 HYDRO 343 291 237 222 231
69 KADRA 1 50 HYDRO
69 KADRA 2 50 HYDRO 77
69 KADRA 3 50 HYDRO 77
70 KODASALI 0 120 HYDRO 303 281 217 213 215
70 KODASALI 1 40 HYDRO 71
70 KODASALI 2 40 HYDRO 72
70 KODASALI 3 40 HYDRO 72 1
71 ALMATTI DAM 0 180 HYDRO 0 0 0 0 139
71 ALMATTI DAM 1 15 HYDRO 12 1
72 JOG 0 139.2 HYDRO 0 116 145 159 172
72 JOG 1 13.2 HYDRO 16 1
72 JOG 2 13.2 HYDRO
72 JOG 3 13.2 HYDRO
72 JOG 4 13.2 HYDRO
72 JOG 5 21.6 HYDRO
72 JOG 6 21.6 HYDRO
72 JOG 7 21.6 HYDRO
72 JOG 8 21.6 HYDRO 27 1
73 SIVASAMUNDRUM 0 42 HYDRO 75 5 14 79 193
73 SIVASAMUNDRUM 1 3 HYDRO
74 SHIMSAPURA 0 17.2 HYDRO 62 43 57 57 94
74 SHIMSAPURA 1 8.6 HYDRO
74 SHIMSAPURA 2 8.6 HYDRO
75 MUNIRABAD 0 28.3 HYDRO 100 66 47 41 69
75 MUNIRABAD 1 9 HYDRO
75 MUNIRABAD 2 9 HYDRO
75 MUNIRABAD 3 10.3 HYDRO
76 SHIVAPURA 0 18 HYDRO 104 104 67 54 71
76 SHIVAPURA 1 9 HYDRO
76 SHIVAPURA 2 9 HYDRO
77 SHAHPUR 0 6.6 HYDRO 14 34 22 22 24
77 SHAHPUR 1 1.3 HYDRO
78 MADHAVAMANTRI 0 4.5 HYDRO 0 0 0 13 23
78 MADHAVAMANTRI 1 1.5 HYDRO 8 1
79 NARAYANPUR 0 11.6 HYDRO 0 27 36 38 43
79 NARAYANPUR 1 5.8 HYDRO 21 1
79 NARAYANPUR 2 5.8 HYDRO 21 1
80 KUTTIADI & EXTN. 0 125 HYDRO 266 328 302 258 369
80 KUTTIADI 1 25 HYDRO
80 KUTTIADI EXTN. 4 50 HYDRO 148 1
81 IDUKKI 0 780 HYDRO 2,285 2,739 1,895 1,240 1,993
81 IDUKKI 1 130 HYDRO
82 SABARIGIRI 0 300 HYDRO 1,331 1,398 800 695 1,218
82 SABARIGIRI 1 50 HYDRO
83 IDAMALAYAR 0 75 HYDRO 327 330 258 154 335
83 IDAMALAYAR 1 37.5 HYDRO
83 IDAMALAYAR 2 37.5 HYDRO
84 LOWER PERIYAR 0 180 HYDRO 542 559 412 361 511
84 LOWER PERIYAR 1 60 HYDRO
85 KAKKAD 0 50 HYDRO 177 183 149 125 210
85 KAKKAD 1 25 HYDRO 105 1
85 KAKKAD 2 25 HYDRO 105 1
86 SHOLAYAR 0 54 HYDRO 195 226 137 201 263
86 SHOLAYAR 1 18 HYDRO
87 SENGULAM 0 48 HYDRO 132 114 129 127 165
87 SENGULAM 1 12 HYDRO
87 SENGULAM 2 12 HYDRO
87 SENGULAM 3 12 HYDRO 41 1
87 SENGULAM 4 12 HYDRO 41 1
88 NARIMANGLAM 0 45 HYDRO 263 272 229 195 232
88 NARIMANGLAM 1 15 HYDRO
89 PALLIVASAL 0 37.5 HYDRO 165 117 156 192 222
89 PALLIVASAL 1 5 HYDRO 30 1
89 PALLIVASAL 4 7.5 HYDRO
90 PORINGALKUTTU 0 32 HYDRO 173 190 122 229 181
90 PORINGALKUTTU 1 8 HYDRO
91 PORINGALKUTTU L 0 16 HYDRO 53 29 78 0 169
91 PORINGALKUTTU L 1 16 HYDRO 169
92 PANNIAR 0 30 HYDRO 168 122 78 76 141
92 PANNIAR 1 15 HYDRO
92 PANNIAR 2 15 HYDRO 71 1
93 KALLADA 0 15 HYDRO 69 67 35 36 75
93 KALLADA 1 7.5 HYDRO
93 KALLADA 2 7.5 HYDRO
94 CHEMBUKADAVU-II 0 3.75 HYDRO 0 0 0 0 6
94 CHEMBUKADAVU-II 1 1.25 HYDRO 2 1
95 URUMI-I 0 3.75 HYDRO 0 0 0 0 3
95 URUMI 1 1.25 HYDRO 1 1

96 MANIYAR 0 12 HYDRO 31 29 23 21 34
96 MANIYAR 1 4 HYDRO
97 KUTHUNGAL 0 21 HYDRO 0 33 23 19 36
97 KUTHUNGAL 1 7 HYDRO 12 1
98 KUNDAH I-V 0 555 HYDRO 1,692 1,336 760 427 1,559
98 KUNDAH-I 1 20 HYDRO
98 KUNDAH-II 4 35 HYDRO
98 KUNDAH-III 9 60 HYDRO
98 KUNDAH-IV 12 50 HYDRO
98 KUNDAH-IV 13 50 HYDRO
98 KUNDAH-V 14 20 HYDRO
98 KUNDAH-V 15 20 HYDRO
99 PARSEN_S VALLE 0 30 HYDRO 64 34 16 18 55
99 PARSEN_S VALLE 1 30 HYDRO 55 1
100 METTUR DAM 0 240 HYDRO 704 411 129 181 333
100 METTUR DAM 1 10 HYDRO
100 METTUR TUNNEL 5 50 HYDRO

101 PERIYAR 0 140 HYDRO 485 457 226 212 491
101 PERIYAR 1 35 HYDRO
102 KODAYAR-I&II 0 100 HYDRO 310 215 149 140 204
102 KODAYAR-I 1 60 HYDRO
102 KODAYAR-II 2 40 HYDRO
103 SHOLAYAR I&II 0 95 HYDRO 382 259 318 198 349
103 SHOLAYAR -I 1 35 HYDRO
103 SHOLAYAR -I 2 35 HYDRO
103 SHOLAYAR-II 3 25 HYDRO
104 PYKARA 0 58.95 HYDRO 347 381 253 140 217
104 PYKARA 1 6.65 HYDRO
104 PYKARA 4 11 HYDRO
105 ALIYAR 0 60 HYDRO 183 121 107 86 161
105 ALIYAR 1 60 HYDRO
106 SARKARPATHY 0 30 HYDRO 156 150 97 150 115
106 SARKARPATHY 1 30 HYDRO
107 PAPANASAM 0 28 HYDRO 124 98 65 47 88
107 PAPANASAM 1 7 HYDRO
108 MOYAR 0 36 HYDRO 147 163 104 53 90
108 MOYAR 1 12 HYDRO
109 SURULIYAR 0 35 HYDRO 93 87 75 41 101

109 SURULIYAR 1 35 HYDRO
110 SERVALAR 0 20 HYDRO 34 24 19 19 33
110 SERVALAR 1 20 HYDRO
111 LOWER METTUR 0 120 HYDRO 428 367 167 0 254
LOWER METTUR
111 PH-1 1 15 HYDRO
LOWER METTUR
111 PH-1 2 15 HYDRO
LOWER METTUR
111 PH-2 3 15 HYDRO
LOWER METTUR
111 PH-2 4 15 HYDRO
LOWER METTUR
111 PH-3 5 15 HYDRO
LOWER METTUR
111 PH-3 6 15 HYDRO
LOWER METTUR
111 PH-4 7 15 HYDRO
LOWER METTUR
111 PH-4 8 15 HYDRO
112 VAIGAI DAM 0 13.5 HYDRO 78 64 27 16 86
112 VAIGAI DAM 1 3 HYDRO
112 VAIGAI DAM 2 3 HYDRO
112 SATHNUR DAM 3 7.5 HYDRO 48
113 KADAMPARI 0 400 HYDRO 186 162 202 406 256
113 KADAMPARI 1 100 HYDRO
In Summary
Combined margin emission factor is arrived as -
Parameter 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

Gross
Generation 128,796 131,747 136,742 138,153 143,932
Total (In GWh)
Net Generation
120,964 123,468 127,617 128,032 134,551
Total (In GWh)
20% of Net
Generation (In 24,193 24,694 25,523 25,606 26,910
GWh)
Absolute
Emissions 87,815,363 91,590,959 103,269,937 107,406,076 104,917,425
Total (tCO2)
Absolute
Emissions OM 87,815,363 91,590,959 103,269,937 107,406,076 104,917,425
(tCO2)
Absolute
Emissions BM 19,332,594
(tCO2)
Simple
Operating
1.02 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Margin (tCO2/
MWh)
Build Margin
0.71
(tCO2/ MWh)
Combined
margin incl.
0.86 0.85 0.85 0.86 0.85
Imports (tCO2/
MWh)
Appendix 2
PROJECT CASH FLOW

For without considering the revenues from CDM

(Or click the link below)
Without CDM
Revenues.xls
For with revenues from CDM factored in the project cash flow
(Or click the link below)
With CDM
Revenues.xls



Wind Mill Project

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Wind Mill Project

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02)

CDM – Executive Board page 1

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

A. General description of the small-scale project activity

C. Duration of the project activity / Crediting period

D. Monitoring methodology and plan

E. Calculation of GHG emission reductions by sources

Annex 1: Information on participants in the project activity

Annex 2: Information regarding public funding

Appendix 1: Baseline Information

Appendix 2: Project cash flows and assumptions certified by Charted Accountant

CDM – Executive Board page 2

Revision history of this document

Version Date Description and reason of revision

CDM – Executive Board page 3

SECTION A. General description of the small-scale project activity

A.1. Title of the small-scale project activity:

CDM – Executive Board page 4

Sl. Date of H.T. S.C.

A.4. Technical description of the small-scale project activity:

CDM – Executive Board page 5

Parameters NM 48/750 Parameters NM 48/750

A.4.1. Location of the small-scale project activity:

CDM – Executive Board page 6

Tenkasi Wind Farm

(Figure 1: Location map of the 12 MW Bundled Wind Power Project in Tenkasi)

Scope – 1 : Energy Industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)

CDM – Executive Board page 7

Years Annual Estimate of emission reductions in tonnes of CO2 e

A.4.4. Public funding of the small-scale project activity:

CDM – Executive Board page 8

CDM – Executive Board page 9

Assumptions for Investment Analysis

CDM – Executive Board page 10

Barriers and additionality

3. Institutional and Regulatory Barriers

CDM – Executive Board page 11

Impact of CDM registration

CDM – Executive Board page 12

Calculation of Combined Margin Emission Factor

Parameter 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

CDM – Executive Board page 13

SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / Crediting period:

C.1. Duration of the small-scale project activity:

CDM – Executive Board page 14

D.3 Data to be monitored:

1 Electricity Electricity kWh M Monthly 100% Electronic & Two Electricity

CDM – Executive Board page 15

D.6. Name of person/entity determining the monitoring methodology:

E.1. Formulae used:

The operating margin emission factor is calculated as:

The build margin emission factor is calculated as:

Average emission factor is calculated as:

The CO2 emission coefficient COEF i is obtained as

CDM – Executive Board page 16

EFBM,y is the build margin emission factor

CDM – Executive Board page 17

SECTION F.: Environmental impacts:

Flora and fauna

CDM – Executive Board page 18

CDM – Executive Board page 19

1. Most respondents were farmers with no education at all.

CDM – Executive Board page 20