Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Introduction

The evolution mobile phones as Personal Communication Devices and the explosion of devices such as tablets have created a challenge for the mobile networks, starting from the Base Station and the Mobile Backhaul. New initiatives such as Small Cells reduce the pressure of capacity crunch and coverage limitations, but the importance of Macro Base Stations remains very high. With the transition to the packet based backhaul mechanisms, the synchronization implementations have become extremely challenging.

Base Station Synchronization Requirements


Traditionally Base Stations were connected to the core network through circuit switched network connections delivering data and the frequency synchronization. When Phase information was required because of the air interface requirements, a GPS based system was used and a combination of GPS and line extracted frequency were used for synchronizing base stations. We can generalize the requirements to network side requirements and radio side requirements. GPS Network Interface Timing & Synchronizati on Modem

Radio Interface

The network recovered clock had to meet the limit of 16ppb to the network and the air interface had a frequency accuracy requirement of 50ppb and phase accuracy requirement of few S whenever required. The 16ppb requirement is derived from the Stratum 2 frequency accuracy levels of and in a scenario where the network or GPS synchronization were lost, the base station be able to maintain its accuracy within the air interface limits. The following table shows the frequency accuracy requirement of most commonly used air interface requirements.
Radio Technology GSM CDMA2000 WCDMA-FDD WCDMA-TDD TD-SCDMA LTE FDD & TDD BTS Type Macro BTS Macro BTS Wide Area BTS Wide Area BTS Wide Area BTS Wide area BTS, >3km radius Wide area BTS, 3km radius Home BTS, >500m rad. Home BTS, 500m rad. Frequency Accuracy 50ppb 50ppb 50ppb 50ppb 50ppb 10s 3s 1.33 +Tprop s 3s 2.5s 3s (norm) 10s (max) Phase/Time Accuracy

LTE-TDD

Base Station Synchronization Challenges


The challenges in Macro Base Station Synchronization are multi fold. GPS or other GNSS methods are no longer preferred as a primary source of network timing because of the fear of signal loss or jamming in various situations. Secondly, the circuit switch network is transitioning to packet switched network forcing the Base Stations to use Synchronous Ethernet and Precision Time Protocol based synchronization techniques. ITU-T has finalized the standards for frequency only Packet Equipment Slave Clocks and are working to finalize the network and equipment requirements for phase and frequency. Many implementations are relying on a combination of GNSS and packet clock methods to achieve the synchronization requirements.

Rakon Oscillators for Base Station Timing applications


Two main aspects of the oscillators are considered for Base Station synchronization designs. The holdover requirement is one of the primary objectives. The service impact on the service provider is the turnaround time to attend to and repair the systems, if anything were to disturb synchronization mechanisms. Holdover time is required by the operator so that they system remains operations within the time limit in which it can be attended to. Depending on the air interface requirements, constraints may be placed on frequency only or frequency and phase to achieve certain holdover time periods. In a synchronizer design, the holdover time depends on the oscillator, specifically on the frequency versus temperature characteristics and the slope performances of frequency with temperature. Secondly, Packet based networks impose extremely low bandwidths on clock recovery PLLs, due to the varying nature of PDVs. Depending on the loop bandwidth, very stable oscillators (MTIE and TDEV on such bandwidths ) are required for implementation of such PLLs. Oscillator selection is carefully done identifying the holdover and loop bandwidth requirements, along with other considerations such as phase noise. At Rakon we have the expertise to help determine the best oscillator solution for our customers systems requirements. Oscillator solutions require knowledge of the differential in frequency versus the differential in temperature. Full characterization is determined by defining the temperature ramp and measurement rate and a detailed analysis over the characterization time period. Rakon has characterized various types of oscillators under changing environmental conditions for the loop time periods relevant to IEEE 1588v2. Rakon has also performed extended tests on the holdover phase movement performance of the OCXOs and features devices that has holdover performance of 1uS over the temperature range over 24 hours. Rakon has wide range of OCXOs that economically fit a wide range of holdover requirements of 1us to 10us across 8hours to 24 hours. [ 3 OCXO families 2 ROX families with 1uS over 24 hours, 1 us over 8 hours with holdover performance plots. MTIE and TDEV plots with 0.05mHz with G.8263 masks. Phase noise curves] 1 STP family. Performance maps and plots Other products available Mercury and XO VCXOs for the solution]

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen