Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
As an author of Historical Account of Faridkot State, I am closely following the Faridkot Royal Estates Case. Actually the case about the properties of Maharaja of Faridkot State was between the eldest daughter of Maharaja ( Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, the Plaintiff) and the other daughter ( Maharani Deepinder Kaur, the Defendant). One daughter (the Plaintiff) initially was for having the entire property, then for a share in properties of her father and the other daughter (the Defendant, Chair-person of Maharawal Khewaji Trust) was for keeping the properties intact to preserve as heritage for the future generations as per the Will of her father. The Judgement dated 25.7.2013 was in favour of the Plaintiff (seeking division of the properties) and against the Defendant (seeking the properties as per the Will) But it was reported in the media with a major slant that the two daughters got the Royal Bonanza of Rs. 20,000 crores after 21 years and the like. It is highly motivated. The impression was given out as if both sisters were interested to have the share in the property. It is important to investigate as to who
prepared the Press Release, if any, and also the real forces behind this type of one-sided publicity. However on Appeal by the Trust, it was stayed by the District Court. There is a documentary evidence that there is a strong group in Ambala City (alleged as Land Mafia) seeking to grab the prime land involved in the whole case. Some people are being used just as pawns in the game. Amrit Kaur, the Petitioner against the Will, had entered into an agreement through General Power of Attorney signed by her on 14.2.1996.transferring the case for Rs65 lakh. As per the agreement, called "assignment deed", a group of nine persons from Ambala, represented by one Satpal Grover, had paid Rs65 lakh through four demand drafts to Amrit Kaur. When she was asked about this agreement in court by the defence lawyer, she said she had indeed entered into such an agreement, but the agreement did not stand. She said she had spent the money to pay lawyers in the case. So far this Document, though mentioned briefly in a section of the media, was not brought to the lime light it deserved. Pre-Judgement Sell-Out of the Case (i.e. Royal Properties) (Through General Power of Attorney)
As a matter of fact The General Power of Attorney was an assignment deed. 1. The Assignment Deed was executed between Amrit Harpal Singh (The 1st Party) and 1. Sh. Kuldeep Singh Lamba, 2. Sh. Gajinder Singh, 3.Sh. Harinderpal Singh, 4. Sh. Satnam Singh, 5. Sh. Anup Singh, 6. Sh.Gurpreet Singh, 7. Gurmeet Singh, 8. Mrs. Sancheta Singh W/O Gurpreet Singh, 9. Satpal Grover, through Sh. Satpal Grover as (The 2nd Party). 2. The Deed was about the Civil Suit No. 228 of 1992, titled as Rajkumari Amrit Kaur v/s Maharani Deepinder Kaur and others and both the Parties agreed to the following terms & conditions (which are the prominent features of the assignment): i) The 1st Party acknowledges the receipt of the aforesaid Demand Drafts and has issued separate receipt to this effect. This Assignment Deed is subject to the encashment of Demand Drafts in favour of the 1st Party and shall become effective
only after the realization of the amount of Demand Drafts. ii) The 2nd Party sought to acquire the rights, titles, interest, share, benefits and actionable claims in the properties situated in India only (will not have any right or claim over the properties outside India) and for this the 2md Party paid to the 1st Party nonrefundable money by means of Demand Draft as full & final payment
(1.DD.No. 110023692 dated, 02.01.1996 of BKME Safat, Kuwait, Rs. 50, 00, 000/ (Rs. Fifty Lacs), payable at the Bank of India, Sector 17, Chandigarh, in the name of Mrs. Amrit Kaur. 2. DD. No. 176635 & 176636, dt. 16.01.1996 and DD. No. 175544 13.02.1996, all of Allahabad Bank, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi, (5,00,000-Five Lacs eachtotal 15,00,000-fifteen Lacs) payable at Allahabad Bank Chandigarh, in the name of Mrs. Am,rit Kaur.
(all were encashed by the 1st Party without any loss of time)
Signed by Amrit Harpal Singh Executant 1. From this Document everything becomes crystal clear that the Case of Faridkot Royal Estates was sold to a Group of Nine Persons of Ambala for just Rs. 65,00,000(Sixty Five Lacs) only. 2. It was a well planned case to grab the properties & to destroy the Historic Heritage of Faridkot State. What a tribute by the elder daughter (Amrit Kaur) to her Dear father (Maharaja Harinder Singh Brar)? 3. It was squandering away the Precious Heritage80% to the Group of Nine (having connection with Kuwait, as the Demand Draft for Rs. Fifty Lacs came from Kuwait Bank and 20% to the dear daughter. 4. Amrit Kaur had accepted its authenticity during her Cross-Examination. She also said that the matter is settled and the Documents stand cancelled. I had spent the said amount of Sixty Five Lacs by paying the same to the lawyers as their fees. She was directed to produce the PAN CARD which she never did. 5. How was it possible when the Assignment Deed was irrevocable and the entire expenditure was to be done by the 2nd Party as per Assignment Deed.
6. What is more surprising is the fact that there is not any observation by the Trial Court in its judgement dated 25.7.2013 though the Document was fairly discussed during the proceedings. By
Amarjit Singh Dhillon Dr. (from Canada)