Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
It is the measurement and reporting of the costs incurred to acquire and develop people as organizational resourcesObjectives of HRA systems It's basically adopted to treat human resources as assets, to generate human data about names, to assign value to human assets in the balance sheet.
Objectives of HRA:
The objectives include:
Provide information for making management decisions about acquiring, allocating, developing and maintaining human resources in order to attain cost effective organization objective. To develop methods of ensuring human resources cost and value and to allow management personnel to monitor effectively the use of human resources. Provide a system of asset control i.e. whether assets are conserved, deflated, or appreciated (Boedker et al 2008). Aid in the development of management principals by classifying the financial consequences of various practices. Develop a theory that will explain the nature and determinants of the value of people to enterprises.
3.
4.
5.
6.
HRCA:
1) Historical Cost Approach The actual cost incurred on recruiting, selecting, training, placing and developing the human resources of an enterprise are capitalized and written off over the expected useful life of human resources
J.B.I.M.S.
Page 3
2) Replacement Cost Approach The cost of replacing employees is used as the measure of companys human resources. The HR of a company are to be valued on the assumption as to what it will cost he concern if existing human resources are required to be replaced with other persons of equivalent experience and talent.
3) Opportunity Cost Approach It is based on economic concept of opportunity cost which removes the deficiency in replacement cost approach. Measured through a competitive bidding process within the entity.
J.B.I.M.S.
Page 4
HRVA:
MODELS USED IN HUMAN RESOURCE VALUE ACCOUNTING
1.
The Lev and Schwartz Model Flamholtz Model Morse Model The Lev and Schwartz Model:-
This model was developed in 1971.It determines the value of human capital embodied in a person of age t is the present value of his remaining future earning from employment in the form of salaries, wages, etc. Under this model: a. All employees are classified in specific groups according to their age and skill. b. Average annual earnings are determined. c. The total earnings where each group will get up to retirement age are calculated. d. The total earnings calculated as above are discounted at the rate of cost of capital. The value thus arrived at will be the value of human resources/assets. The following formula has suggested for calculating the value of an employee according to this model-
V=r*l(t) / (1+R)*t-r
J.B.I.M.S.
Page 5
2.
Flamholtz Model:-
This method determined an individuals value to an organisation by the services he is expected to render to the organisation during the period he is likely to remain with the organisation in various position or services states. The present value of human resource maybe derived by discounting the realisable value of expected future services at a specified rate. The model suggests a five step approach for assessing the value of an individual to the organisation: a. Forecasting the period that is remained in the organisation i.e. his expected service life. b. Identifying his roles and the tasks. c. Estimating the value derived by the organisation when a person occupies a particular position for a specified period of time. d. Discounting the value at a predetermined rate to get the present value of human resources. 3. Morse Model:-
The value of human resources is equivalent to the present value of the net benefits derived by the enterprise from the service of its employees. The following steps are involved under this approach:a. The gross value of the services to be rendered in future by employees is calculated in their individual and collective capacity. b. The value of direct and indirect future payments to the employees is determined. c. The difference between the points (i) and (ii) represents the net benefit to the enterprise.
J.B.I.M.S.
Page 6
HRA in INDIA:
It is a popular phenomenon among the Indian corporate world is to disclose information relating to human resource in annual statements. In this context, it is necessary to conduct a study to assess the disclosure pattern of HRA information in Indian corporate World.
It first promulgated by BHEL (Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd), a leading public enterprise, during the financial year 1972-73. Later it was also adopted by other leading public and private sector Organization in the subsequent years. Some of them are Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd.(HMTL). Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.(ONGC), NTPC, Cochin Refineries Ltd. (CRL), Madras Refineries Ltd.,(MRL), Associated Cement Company Ltd.(ACC) and Infosys Technologies Ltd.(ITL). However, adaptability of various model (mainly Lev and Schwartz model, Flamholtz model and Jaggi and Lev model) and discount rate fixation and disclosure pattern i.e. either age wise, skill wise etc in BHEL, SAIL, MMTC (Minerals & Metals Trading Corporation Of India Ltd.) HMTL, NTP make it clear, that there has been no uniformity among Indian enterprises regarding HRA disclosure. Example: BHEL
P x 12 x N x E x I HRV= F
grade etc. HRV P 12 Human Resources Value of the group of employees in the particular salary Annual compensation per, DA, CCA, HRA, PF contribution by employers
N Total number of employees in the grade. E Efficiency Factor. I Incremental Factor. It is 5% for five years period. F 12% per annum weighted average cost of capital
Research paper AN ANALYTICALSTUDY OF HUMAN RESOURCE ACCOUNTING PRACTICES AN INDIAN EXPERIENCE .....Mamta Ratti Integral Review - A Journal of Management
J.B.I.M.S. Page 7
Sr. No.
Company Name
1 Gillette India Ltd. 2 GGS, Thermal Power Plant 3 HNT International 4 Haryana Milk Foods Ltd. 5 Ind Chenial Health Spl(P) Ltd. 6 Keniforn Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. 7 Mahaan Proteins Ltd. 8 Nibson India Ltd. 9 OST Electronics Ltd. 10 Poorva Consultants 11 Ranbaxy 12 M/s Saint Gobain Diamat Winter Ltd. 13 Sagar Electricals 14 Tata Consultancy Services 15 Vedilal Chemicals Ltd.
It can be inferred that the value of human resources does not depend upon the number of human beings employed or in other words, it can be said that if the number of employees are higher than the value will be higher. The situation may be that value of human resources may be higher in spite of less number of human capitals. So, another factor that increases the value of human capital is amount paid by organizations to their employees. If companies pay higher amount on salaries to their human resources then value will be higher, and if companies will pay less, human capital will be low. This is why, companies have higher
J.B.I.M.S. Page 8
Sr. No.
Company Name
1 Gillette India Ltd. 2 GGS, Thermal Power Plant 3 HNT International 4 Haryana Milk Foods Ltd. 5 Ind Chenial Health Spl(P) Ltd. 6 Keniforn Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. 7 Mahaan Proteins Ltd. 8 Nibson India Ltd. 9 OST Electronics Ltd. 10 Poorva Consultants 11 Ranbaxy 12 M/s Saint Gobain Diamat Winter Ltd. 13 Sagar Electricals 14 Tata Consultancy Services 15 Vedilal Chemicals Ltd.
Per Capita Value of Human Resources: High performing organizations in order to keep performing on a continuous basis must treat their human capital as the most important and valuable asset. They should treat them as adults, as partners and with dignity and respect. As we all know that People who feel good about themselves produce good results and People who produce good results feel good about themselves. Such a healthy and virtuous cycle goes on and on, satisfying the individual goals and organizational goals too at the same time, in that the individual drives the job satisfaction, which in turn induces him to reach out for excellence, culminating in the all round development of the performing organizations. In recent years, India has evolved from an inward looking economy to one with a global orientation. Today, the company exports large number of products to various destinations than ever before. Sound human resources not only facilitate to improve a firms long run responsiveness and flexibility also thereby competitiveness. Organizational structure strategy, technology and physical assets cannot guarantee sustainable competitive advantage for an organization in the era of globally competitive business environment in which not only companies but
J.B.I.M.S. Page 9
Demonstrate the Valuation for Level 1 employees Solution: Step 1: Carry out Age level analysis of 20 employees of Level 1
Step 2: Calculate the expected tenure of each group The mean age of each group is 23,33,43,53 Consider the retirement age as 58 Expected tenure of the groups is 35,25,15 and 5 years respectively For ease of computation let the expected tenure be 5,4,3 and 2 respectively
J.B.I.M.S.
Page 11
J.B.I.M.S.
Page 12
Deterrents to HRA:
Human Resource Accounting (HRA) is relatively a new concept & not much followed in the industry, reason being the objections raised against it. The main deterrents to HRA are as follows: HRA is based on assumptions: The organizations which follow HRA do not have common methods of HR accounting. The assumptions made for accounting vary from organization to organization. The methods are based upon various assumptions. HRA is not recognized by tax laws: Being a new concept, it has not yet received recognition from tax laws worldwide. As there is no rigid base for the assumptions made in the HRA, no tax law recognizes it either as an obligatory or voluntary method of accounting. This results in HRA being considered as a theoretical concept only. Difference in valuation of assets & that of HR: The traditional methods of accounting take into consideration different valuation methods for valuation of assets. These methods cannot be applied to HR valuations as it is not a tangible asset. Factors included for valuing not measurable in monetary terms: As HRA considers the intangible benefits like efficiency, quality, and intellectual properties associated with the human resources of the organization, it cannot be measured in monetary terms. Use of different models makes it difficult for comparison: The methods used for HRA vary from organization to organization which makes it difficult for them to compare the results of the same. The parameters taken into consideration are different for every organization. This makes it difficult for comparison. Not credible: As only numeric figures associated with the human resources cannot depict the true value of the individual, we cannot only rely on HRA for the evaluation of the Human Resource of the organization.
J.B.I.M.S.
Page 13
Conclusion:
Human resource accounting provides quantitative information about the value of human resource, which helps the top management to take decisions regarding the adequacy of human resources. Based on these insights, further steps for recruitment and selection of personnel are taken. Outside the organization, quantitative data on the most valuable asset has an impact on the decision of investors, clients, and potential staff of the company. When proper valuation and accounting of human resources is not done then management may not be able to recognize the negative effects of certain programs, which are aimed at improving profit in the short run. If not recognized on time this programs could lead to fall in productivity levels, high turnover rate and low morale of existing employees. Just as Likert and Bowes (1968) conclusion that whilst it is true that accounting has a myopic focus on monetary data it is also this focus which is impending the flow of accounting information, particularly to external users about economic resources and activities which cannot effectively be expressed in monetary terms. There are several areas in which nonmonetary measurements may be evolved in accounting and human resource accounting is probably one of these. To make valuation of human resource objective and comparable there must be a universally acceptable method of valuation.
J.B.I.M.S.
Page 16