Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Acknowledgement: This project is partially supported by Delphi and CHTE at WPI. Dr. Q. Lu was involved in the early work of the project.
http://me.wpi.edu/~camlab
Practical Problems Lack of systematic heating time and temperature distribution control inside WP. Nonlinear effect of material properties. Lack phase transformation data inside WP for hardness and residual stress determination. Evaluate combination effect of AC power density, frequency and gap on final hardness pattern. Trial and error, cost and design period.
workpiece
Inductor/coil
Martensite content determines the hardness Martensitic structure is the most hardest microstructure
Heating process Joule heat by eddy current Electromagnetic field High freq. AC power
Induction coil
WP
Coil
A=
0 I 4
dl r
(Gauss Law for magnetic field)
B=A
H=B/
(a) WP geometry
QN
E =
B t
(Faradays Law)
QW
QC QS
QB
D=E
QS
H =
D +J t
Heat conduction
Qinduction = E J = J2/
c
c
T = k 2T + Qinduction t
Heat radiation
Heat convection
Concave and convex on surface of workpiece make the heating process not easy to control. ANSYS system is employed for the analysis. Mesh should be much finer at locations of convex and concave in both coil and workpiece.
Geometry Model
Specific heat
t=2s
t=4s
Summary
A finite element method based modeling system is developed to analyze the coupled electromagnetic/thermal process in induction heating and implemented in ANSYS package, with following capabilities. Provide electrical and magnetic field strength distribution. Provide instantaneous temperature field data in workpiece. Provide Temperature history at any location in heating process. Provide guidance for inductor/coil design based on adjustment of current density distribution and desired heating patterns.