Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
6, December 2013
I. INTRODUCTION
Accurate analysis of two-way slabs having different
continuity conditions at their edges is very difficult and for
practical purposes is almost impossible. Thus, there are
several simplified methods for determining the moments,
shear forces and support reactions [1]-[2]. The methods used
for designing RC members are mostly based on elastic
analysis of the structure subjected to the ultimate loads
though, the actual behavior of an indeterministic structure is
that when one or more member reach its bending resistance,
the elastic diagrams of this part will change to some extend
and so, the elastic analysis results cannot be used anymore. In
such case if the structure has sufficient ductility, each time
that the section reaches its bending resistance, the bending
moments will redistribute until some plastic hinges or plastic
lines form and, the structure becomes unstable. In such
circumstances, the structure cannot resist any more load and
collapses (see Fig. 1). Such type of analysis in which the
bending moment diagrams at the failure point are used as a
basis for the design, is called plastic analysis [3]. Although
there are some other methods for analyzing and designing RC
slabs subjected to concentrated load such as finite elements,
finite difference methods, and also using the plates theory
method, but still the best and most practical available method
is the plastic method.
DOI: 10.7763/IJET.2013.V5.640
IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 6, December 2013
x l y + muy y l x = P
ux
(1)
where muy , mux are moments per unit length about the x and
y axes, respectively, y , x are the yield lines rotation angles
about the x and y axes, respectively, l y , l x are the yield lines
lengths along the x and y axes, respectively, P is the
concentrated load and is the displacement under the
application point of the concentrated load. In this work, the
slab is assumed to be isotropic, therefore, mux = muy = mu .
P
b
a
b
a
+
+
+
ma nb a (1 m ) b (1 n )
(2)
1
1
r
1
r
+ +
+
mr n r (1 m ) (1 n )
(3)
P
b
a
b
a
+
+
+
ma nb a (1 m ) b (1 n )
(4)
1
2 . 5(
1
r
1
r
)
+ +
+
mr n r (1 m ) (1 n )
(5)
IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 6, December 2013
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
r
n
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
r
n
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.55
0.038
0.0423
0.0438
0.0445
0.0446
0.0572
0.0676
0.0715
0.0732
0.0737
0.0677
0.0827
0.0887
0.0913
0.0921
0.0731
0.0908
0.0981
0.1013
0.1023
0.0747
0.0934
0.1011
0.1046
0.1056
0.55
0.0152
0.0169
0.0175
0.0178
0.0179
0.0229
0.027
0.0286
0.0293
0.0295
0.0271
0.0331
0.0355
0.0365
0.0368
0.0292
0.0363
0.0392
0.0405
0.0409
0.0299
0.0373
0.0404
0.0418
0.0422
as follows,
m=
0.9
0.95
0.0448
0.0556
0.0601
0.0621
0.0627
0.059
0.0796
0.089
0.0935
0.0948
0.0654
0.0916
0.1044
0.1106
0.1125
0.0684
0.0975
0.1122
0.1193
0.1215
0.0692
0.0993
0.1145
0.122
0.1243
0.0449
0.0567
0.0617
0.0639
0.0645
0.0584
0.0799
0.0901
0.0949
0.0963
0.0642
0.0913
0.1049
0.1115
0.1135
0.0669
0.0969
0.1122
0.1198
0.1222
0.0677
0.0985
0.1145
0.1224
0.1248
0.045
0.0576
0.063
0.0655
0.0662
0.0576
0.08
0.0908
0.096
0.0976
0.063
0.0908
0.105
0.112
0.1141
0.0655
0.096
0.112
0.12
0.1224
0.0662
0.0976
0.1141
0.1224
0.125
0.9
0.95
0.0179
0.0223
0.0241
0.0249
0.0251
0.0236
0.0318
0.0356
0.0374
0.0379
0.0262
0.0366
0.0418
0.0442
0.045
0.0273
0.039
0.0449
0.0477
0.0486
0.0277
0.0397
0.0458
0.0488
0.0497
0.018
0.0227
0.0247
0.0256
0.0258
0.0233
0.032
0.036
0.038
0.0385
0.0257
0.0365
0.0419
0.0446
0.0454
0.0268
0.0387
0.0449
0.0479
0.0489
0.0271
0.0394
0.0458
0.049
0.0499
0.018
0.023
0.0252
0.0262
0.0265
0.023
0.032
0.0363
0.0384
0.039
0.0252
0.0363
0.042
0.0448
0.0457
0.0262
0.0384
0.0448
0.048
0.049
0.0265
0.039
0.0457
0.049
0.05
1.65
3.4
5.5
= 0.3, n =
= 0.4, r =
0.65
5.5
8
8.5
kN .m
m
677
IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 6, December 2013
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
r
n
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
r
n
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.55
0.55
mu = 77.49
mu+ = 51.66
kN , m
mm
As+ = 1153 .82
m
m
0.95
0.0263
0.0377
0.0435
0.0463
0.0472
0.0303
0.0467
0.0559
0.0607
0.0622
0.0318
0.0504
0.0613
0.0671
0.0689
0.0325
0.052
0.0637
0.07
0.072
0.0327
0.0525
0.0644
0.0709
0.0729
0.0257
0.0374
0.0434
0.0465
0.0474
0.0294
0.0457
0.0551
0.06
0.0615
0.0307
0.0491
0.06
0.0659
0.0677
0.0313
0.0505
0.0622
0.0686
0.0706
0.0315
0.051
0.0629
0.0694
0.0714
0.95
0.0252
0.0366
0.0425
0.0455
0.0465
0.029
0.0451
0.0543
0.0593
0.061
0.0304
0.0485
0.0594
0.0654
0.0675
0.0309
0.05
0.0617
0.0682
0.0705
0.0311
0.0504
0.0624
0.069
0.0713
0.0257
0.0374
0.0434
0.0465
0.0474
0.0294
0.0457
0.0551
0.06
0.0615
0.0307
0.0491
0.06
0.0659
0.0677
0.0313
0.0505
0.0622
0.0686
0.0706
0.0315
0.051
0.0629
0.0694
0.0714
kN .m
mm 2
As = 1902 .38
m
m
in longitudinal direction,
IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 6, December 2013
[3]
[4]
[5]
VII. CONCLUSION
As no practical method for designing two-way RC slabs
subjected to concentrated load can be found in RC books,
publications and codes, in this research using the plastic
method (yield lines method) which is an appropriate method
for designing the slabs subjected to concentrated load,
moment coefficients for different conditions of slab edges
supports and various slab dimensions and different points of
application of the loadings have been provided that can be
used for designing RC slabs practically at the engineering
offices.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
679