Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
COUNSEL
1
Chief Judge Williams heard oral argument in this case but did not par-
ticipate in the decision. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pur-
suant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
EEOC v. CENTRAL WHOLESALERS, INC. 3
OPINION
A.
B.
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
When Medley got home later that day, she sent an e-mail
to Wright and Denicoff complaining about DaBay and stating
that she was subjected to a violent and hostile work environ-
ment. No one at Central responded to her e-mail. Two days
later, an attorney representing Medley sent a letter to Denicoff
stating that Medley would not be returning to work. The letter
EEOC v. CENTRAL WHOLESALERS, INC. 11
stated that Medley was subjected to a hostile work environ-
ment and cited, among other things, the November 10 inci-
dent with DaBay, Mike’s Playboy items, the use of profanity,
and Mike and DaBay’s public display of the blue-colored
mop-head dolls which were hanging by nooses tied around
the dolls’ necks. Later, Medley stated that the incidents at
Central caused her emotional distress.
C.
II
A.
B.
C.
D.
1.
2.
IV
REVERSED IN PART,
AFFIRMED IN PART,
AND REMANDED