Shianne Hargrove Professor Frick ENG 102 Fallacy Project 26. March.

2013 Hasty Generalization-The author uses this fallacy when she states This causes younger, more gullible women to have unwanted pregnancies with their greater risks. She is making a broad generalization about young women and their state of mind, without any further proof of how young women act in todays society Hasty Generalization-The author uses this term again when she states Pro-lifers condemn the Chinese for forcing women with two or more children to abort. The author is making a sweeping generalization about the mind-set of Pro-lifers and their thoughts on abortion in China. False Analogy- This fallacy is being used when the author states The risk of women dying from oral contraceptives is about 1in 1.7 million or about that of being struck by lightning She is comparing the likelihood of being killed by oral contraceptives to the likelihood of being struck by lightning, and how improbable it would be.

Loaded Label or Definition-This fallacy is used when the author states Pro-lifers discourage women from using safe, effective and affordable contraceptives this quote could be seen as a loaded label because the author uses the term pro-lifers and to a lot of Americans that term brings up images of republicans who are opposed to abortion and are less interest in the safety of women. She uses discourage as a negative connotation and safe and effective as fact for the use of said contraceptives. Red-Herring/Tu Quo-The author uses this term when she states Pro-lifers condemn the Chinese for forcing women with more than two children to abort The author in her letter goes on about the destruction of forcing women in America to have their babies, and the risks of doing so. She piles on information about oral contraceptives and talks about American organization that are beneficial for women who want abortion, but then she talks about pro-lifers and their viewpoint on Chinese Poisoning the Well-The author uses this fallacy when she states The pseudoscientific misinformation, crucial omissions absurd claims and outrageous exaggerations spread by prolife people. Right off the bat the reader can see the viewpoint of the author and her intent.

Part of the Whole-The author uses this term when she states The World Health Organization's International Agencies for the Research on Cancer concluded that the use of combined oral contraceptives slightly modifies the risk of breast cancer etc. former data on oral contraceptivesrelated cancers were older pills containing more estrogen than the current pills. The author is picking out the part and not looking at the whole. She is focusing at a small portion of what oral contraceptives can do to women, she is focusing on the less harmful examples of the contraceptives. She is also using the persitgious title of the organization

Shianne Hargrove Professor Frick ENG 102 Fallacy Project 26. March. 2013 Ad Hominem-This fallacy is being used when the author states His constitutional ignorance is trumped only by his apparent disdain for the wisdom of the farmers. The author is referring to Egon de Uriate. The author is personally attacking this person, making a issue of his honesty and credibility. Part of the Whole-The author states the First Amendment make it clear that the first 10 amendments are prohibitions against Congress to protect the states from Congress meddling in their affairs. The author is nitpicking parts of the amendment to make his argument seem valid. Hasty Generalization-The author states The security of the states depend upon militias which consisted of armed free people. The author is making a board generalization about militates and the roles that men and women play in the safety of Americans. Argument to the People-My right to defend myself, my family and my property is a natural and Godgiven right. The author is using the symbol of God as a stepping stone to appeal to the people, and to his reasons for owning a gun. Appeal to False Authority-My right to defend myself, my family and my property is a natural and God-given right and is not dependent on a government granting it to me. Its not negotiable or contingent on some politicians whim or vote. And it is certainly not up to anyone elses definition of reasonable. It seems as if the author is using God which is an important figure to many people as a way to justify his use of having a gun. False Analogy-To blame LaPierre and the NRA for gun violence is like blaming AAA or PennDOT for car accidents. The author is comparing gun violence to car accidents, which are not comparable. Loaded Label or Definition-We, who make up the NRA, are responsible, hardworking, freedom loving, God-fearing Americans. The author uses the terms responsible and hardworking as a way to make those not in the NRA, and who dont support the use of guns something other than those two terms.

Hasty Generalization-madmen who have no fear of the eternal ramifications of the evil they perpetrate while on this earth. The author makes a sweeping generalization about those that use guns for violence, and their mindset. Hasty Generalization-We, who make up the NRA, are responsible, hardworking, freedom loving, God-fearing Americans. The author is trying to make claim that everyone in the NRA uphold the same character traits and way of thinking. Appeal to Ignorance-the First Amendment make it clear that the first 10 amendments are prohibitions against Congress to protect the states from Congress meddling in their affairs. In this quote the author is trying to appeal to an audience that may not have a stable understanding of the government and the amendment, and his tires to be the educator to their ignorance.

Shianne Hargrove Professor Frick ENG 102 Fallacy Project 26. March. 2013 Ad Hominem-Lies and false promises designed to camouflage his mission to destroy America. The author is addressing the president, and assuming that President Obama is out to end to reign of power in America. He is personally attacking the president, and his character. Ad Hominem-All of the presidents misrepresentations are but a mask to hide his agenda designed to weaken the military. The author is again personally attacking the presidents character and the author is shifting the argument away from the presidents policies and attacking him on a personal level. Hasty Generalization-Sadly, our White House has become a den of lies, corruption, secrecy and arrogance The author is making a sweeping generalization about the state of the White House and those that work in it. Appeal to Ignorance-Beware of the numerous lies to be unveiled during the implementation of Obamacare. The author is trying to enlighten those that arent aware of Obamacare. He is trying to persuade the audience to accept his word and what he says is true about the subject of Obamacare. Tu Quo-To this day Fast and the Furious and Benghazi remain major coverups. The author brings up two completely issues which have nothing to do with his earlier argument about Presidents speech approach and his policies. Appeal to Authority-Take away our freedoms and restrict people from obeying the commandments of Almighty God. The author uses God who is an important to many Americans as a way to justify his claims of the government stripping Americans of their rights. Provincialism-My conclusion is that liberalism is a lie The author is assuming liberalism as a lie and will continue to be ignorant of the stance of said politics and doesnt seem to want to understand. Appeal to Traditional Wisdom-Nebulous promises of hope and change and moving forward are replacing our countrys wholesome ideals and traditional values. The authors always done it this, not

changing mentality is clear, he doesnt want to change his suppose traditional way of the thinking to adopt the presidents ideal of change.