2013 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count

2013 Greater
Los Angeles
Homeless Count
Key Findings for
Service Planning Areas and
Supervisorial Districts
Published by:
The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority
Updated August 27, 2013
2013 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count
Key Findings Service Planning Areas

Homelessness Population Totals
Changes in Service Planning Area (SPA) Homeless Populations, 2011 - 2013

2013
Total
Homeless
LA CoC
Overall
SPA 1
SPA 2
SPA 3
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
2011
Shelter &
Hidden
Total
Street Count
Homeless
Homeless
Only
2011 - 2013
Shelter &
Hidden
Street Count
Homeless
Only
Changes in Total
Homeless
Changes in Shelter &

Street Count Only
53,798
18,274
35,524
45,422
10,800
34,622
+8,376
+18.4%
+902
+2.6%
6,957
7,790
4,444
10,470
4,662
11,234
2,430
5,811
4,843
2,953
1,649
0
995
4,190
0
3,644
2,114
4,837
2,795
10,470
3,667
7,044
2,430
2,167
1,412
4,727
3,918
11,571
3,512
8,735
4,759
6,788
0
1,007
1,419
1,485
0
1,195
1,551
4,143
1,412
3,720
2,499
10,086
3,512
7,540
3,208
2,645
+5,545
+3,063
+526
-1,101
+1,150
+2,499
-2,329
-977
+392.7%
+64.8%
+13.4%
-9.5%
+32.7%
+28.6%
-48.9%
-14.4%
+702
+1,117
+296
+384
+155
-496
-778
-478
+49.7%
+30.0%
+11.8%
+3.8%
+4.4%
-6.6%
-24.3%
-18.1%
Before including the Hidden Homeless (homeless people who would not have been seen in the street or shelter
count) homelessness in the Los Angeles Continuum of Care (LA CoC) increased to 35,524 men, women and children
(+2.6%) in the street and shelter count over 2011 estimates
When estimates for the Hidden Homeless are included, the LA CoC number increases to 53,798 people, an increase
(+8,376 people or +18.4%) versus the 45,422 counted in 2011
Looking at the totals without the Hidden Homeless, SPA 1 and SPA 2 had the biggest increases with +49.7% and
+30.0%, respectively; the biggest decreases were in SPA 7 and SPA 8 with -24.3% and -18.1%
When factoring in Hidden Homeless numbers, SPA 1 had the biggest increase followed by SPAs 2, 5, 6 and 3; SPAs 7,
8 and 4 demonstrated decreases
Excludes cities of Long Beach, Pasadena and Glendale

Homelessness by Household Type
Comparison of Service Planning Area (SPA) Homelessness by Household Type, 2011 vs. 2013
2013
Total
LA CoC
Overall
SPA 1
SPA 2
SPA 3
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
2011
Family
Members
Single Adults
Unaccompanied
Youth (<18)
Total
Family
Members
Single Adults
Unaccompanied
Youth (<18)
53,798
46,303
86%
6,678
12%
817
2%
45,422
35,838
79%
9,218
20%
366
1%
6,957
7,790
4,444
10,470
4,662
11,234
2,430
5,811
6,539
6,719
3,935
8,598
3,932
9,434
1,901
5,245
94%
86%
89%
82%
84%
84%
78%
90%
393
1,012
487
1,572
646
1,518
499
551
6%
13%
11%
15%
14%
14%
21%
9%
25
59
22
300
84
282
30
15
<1%
1%
<1%
3%
2%
3%
1%
<1%
1,412
4,727
3,918
11,571
3,512
8,735
4,759
6,788
889
3,821
3,385
9,655
2,804
5,582
3,868
5,834
63%
81%
86%
83%
80%
64%
81%
86%
517
866
526
1,781
681
3,017
888
942
37%
18%
13%
15%
19%
35%
19%
14%
6
40
7
135
27
136
3
12
<1%
1%
<1%
1%
1%
2%
<1%
<1%
Changes in Service Planning Area (SPA) Homelessness by Household Type, 2011 - 2013
2011 - 2013
2011 - 2013
Changes
LA CoC
Overall
SPA 1
SPA 2
SPA 3
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
Single Adults
Family Members
Unaccompanied
Youth (<18)
+8,376
+18%
+10,465
+29%
-2,540
-28%
+451
+123%
+5,545
+3,063
+526
-1,101
+1,150
+2,499
-2,329
-977
+393%
+65%
+13%
-10%
+33%
+29%
-49%
-14%
+5,650
+2,898
+550
-1,057
+1,128
+3,852
-1,967
-589
+636%
+76%
+16%
-11%
+40%
+69%
-51%
-10%
-124
+146
-39
-209
-35
-1,499
-389
-391
-24%
+17%
-7%
-12%
-5%
-50%
-44%
-42%
+19
+19
+15
+165
+57
+146
+27
+3
+317%
+48%
+214%
+122%
+211%
+107%
+900%
+25%

2011 Comparison

Single Adult Homelessness

Family Homelessness

Unaccompanied Youth Homelessness
For the purposes of HUD

reporting, CoCs must be able
to report separately on
unaccompanied homeless
children who are under age
18.
Defining youth as under age
18 allows HUD to use the
same definition for all
reporting related to homeless
programs. Transition Age
Youth (TAY), or youth
between ages 18-25, are
counted as part of the Single
Adult population.

The LA CoC had an overall increase in homelessness (18.4%);

there were increases in 5 of the 8 SPAs with the biggest
increase in homelessness in SPA 1 (+393%) and decreases in
SPAs 4 (-10%), 7 (-49%) and 8 (-14%)
Single Adults biggest increase in household types in 5 of the 8 SPAs
with the biggest increase also occurring in SPA 1 (+636%);
Family Members decreased in every SPA except for SPA 2 (+17%);
biggest decreases were in SPAs 6 (-50%), 7 (-44%) and 8 (-42%)
Unaccompanied Youth increased in every single SPA with the biggest
increases in SPA 7 (+900%), SPA 1 (+317%), SPA 3 (+214%) and SPA 5
(+211%)

Comparison of Service Planning Area (SPA) Geographic Distribution of Homeless Households, 2011 vs. 2013
Total
SPA 1
SPA 2
SPA 3
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
LA CoC
Total
2011
1,412
4,727
3,918
11,571
3,512
8,735
4,759
6,788
2013
6,957
7,790
4,444
10,470
4,662
11,234
2,430
5,811
Single Adults
2011
2013
889
2%
6,539
14%
3,821
11%
6,719
15%
3,385
9%
3,935
9%
9,655
27%
8,598
19%
2,804
8%
3,932
8%
5,582
16%
9,434
20%
3,868
11%
1,901
4%
5,834
16%
5,245
11%
45,422
53,798
35,838
100% 46,303 100%
Family Members
2011
2013
517
6%
393
6%
866
9%
1,012
15%
526
6%
487
7%
1,781
19%
1,572
24%
681
7%
646
10%
3,017
33%
1,518
23%
888
10%
499
7%
942
10%
551
8%
Unaccompanied Youth (<18)

2011
2013
6
2%
25
3%
40
11%
59
7%
7
2%
22
3%
135
37%
300
37%
27
7%
84
10%
136
37%
282
34%
3
1%
30
4%
12
3%
15
2%
9,218
366
100%
6,678
100%
100%
817
100%

Homelessness by Shelter Type
Changes in Sheltered Homelessness by Service Planning Area (SPA), 2011 - 2013

Total
#
LA CoC
Overall
SPA 1
SPA 2
SPA 3
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
Sheltered
#
%
53,798 100.0% 12,934

45,422 100.0% 16,882
+8,376 +18.4% -3,948
6,957 100.0%
309
1,412 100.0%
521
+5,545 +392.6% -212
7,790 100.0% 1,370
4,727 100.0% 1,417
+3,063 +64.8%
-47
4,444 100.0% 1,367
3,918 100.0% 1,475
+526 +13.4%
-108
10,470 100.0% 4,337
11,571 100.0% 5,338
-1,101
-9.5%
-1,001
4,662 100.0% 1,515
3,512 100.0% 1,687
+1,150 +32.8%
-172
11,234 100.0% 2,390
8,735 100.0% 3,855
+2,499 +28.6% -1,465
2,430 100.0%
897
4,759 100.0% 1,242
-2,329 -48.9%
-345
5,811 100.0%
749
6,788 100.0% 1,347
-977
-14.4%
-598
10
24.0%
37.2%
-23.4%
4.4%
36.9%
-40.7%
17.6%
30.0%
-3.3%
30.8%
37.7%
-7.3%
41.4%
46.1%
-18.8%
32.5%
48.0%
-10.2%
21.3%
44.1%
-38.0%
36.9%
26.1%
-27.8%
12.9%
19.8%
-44.4%
Unsheltered
#
%
Hidden Homeless
#
%
22,590 42.0% 18,274 34.0%

17,740 39.0% 10,800 23.8%
+4,850 +27.3% +7,474 +69.2%
1,805
26.0%
4,843
69.6%
891
63.1%
0
0.0%
+914 +102.5% +4,843
N/A
3,467
44.5%
2,953
37.9%
2,303
48.7%
1,007
21.3%
+1,164 +50.5% +1,946 +193.2%
1,428
32.1%
1,649
37.1%
1,024
26.1%
1,419
36.2%
+404 +39.4% +230 +16.2%
6,133
58.6%
0
0.0%
4,748
41.1%
1,485
12.8%
+1,385 +29.2% -1,485 -100.0%
2,152
46.2%
995
21.3%
1,825
52.0%
0
0.0%
+327 +18.0% +995
N/A
4,654
41.4%
4,190
37.3%
3,686
42.2%
1,194
13.7%
+968 +26.3% +2,996 +250.9%
1,533
63.1%
0
0.0%
1,966
41.3%
1,551
32.6%
-433
-22.0% -1,551 -100.0%
1,418
24.4%
3,644
62.7%
1,297
19.1%
4,144
61.1%
+121
+9.4%
-500
-12.1%

Homelessness by Age
Comparison of Service Planning Area (SPA) Homelessness Age Totals, 2011 vs. 2013
2013
SPA 1 SPA 2 SPA 3 SPA 4 SPA 5 SPA 6 SPA 7 SPA 8
LA CoC
San
San
Antelope
Metro
East LA
West LA South LA
Overall Valley Fernando Gabriel
LA
County
Valley
Valley
Under 18 4,667 256

625
308
18-24
4,046 495
567
355
25-54 33,043 4,542 4,833 2,773
55-61
7,570 1,034 1,105 637
62 & Older 4,472 630
660
371
Total 53,798 6,957 7,790 4,444
South
Bay
2011
SPA 1 SPA 2 SPA 3 SPA 4 SPA 5 SPA 6 SPA 7 SPA 8
LA CoC
San
San
Antelope
Metro
East LA
West LA South LA
Overall Valley Fernando Gabriel
LA
County
Valley
Valley
1,203 439 1,209 305

322 6,112 339
553
363
843
367
807
188
424 3,708
60
89
321
6,184 2,828 6,754 1,421 3,708 25,585 902 2,787 2,374
1,425 650 1,545 327
847 6,468
66
765
383
815
378
919
189
510 3,549
45
533
477
10,470 4,662 11,234 2,430 5,811 45,422 1,412 4,727 3,918
South
Bay
1,230 427 2,053 540

607
1,303 358
568
467
542
7,033 1,881 4,324 2,818 3,466
1,391 527 1,192 701 1,443
614
319
598
233
730
11,571 3,512 8,735 4,759 6,788
Comparison of Service Planning Area (SPA) Homelessness by Age Prevalence Rates, 2011 vs. 2013
LA CoC
Overall
2011
Under 18 14%
18-24
8%
25-54
56%
55-61
14%
62 & Older 8%
2013
9%
8%
61%
14%
8%
SPA 1
SPA 2
SPA 3
Antelope
San Fernando San Gabriel
Valley
Valley
Valley
2011 2013 2011 2013 2011 2013
24%
4%
12%
8%
9%
7%
4%
7%
2%
7%
8%
8%
64% 65% 59% 62% 61% 63%
5%
15% 16% 14% 10% 14%
3%
9%
11%
9%
12%
8%
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
Metro LA
West LA
South LA
East LA County
South Bay
2011
11%
11%
61%
12%
5%
11
2013
11%
8%
59%
14%
8%
2011
12%
10%
54%
15%
9%
2013
9%
8%
61%
14%
8%
2011
23%
7%
49%
14%
7%
2013
11%
7%
60%
14%
8%
2011
11%
10%
59%
15%
5%
2013
13%
8%
58%
13%
8%
2011
9%
8%
51%
21%
11%
2013
5%
7%
64%
15%
9%

Homelessness by Age
Changes in Service Planning Area (SPA) Homelessness Age Totals, 2011 - 2013
LA CoC Overall
Under 18
18-24
25-54
55-61
62 & Older
Total
#
-1,445
+338
+7,458
+1,102
+923
+8,376
%
-24%
+9%
+29%
+17%
+26%
+18%
SPA 1
Antelope
Valley
#
%
-83
-24%
+435 +725%
+3,640 +404%
+968 +1,467%
+585 +1,300%
+5,545 +393%
SPA 2
San Fernando
Valley
#
%
+72 +13%
+478 +537%
+2,046 +73%
+340 +44%
+127 +24%
+3,063 +65%
SPA 3
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
San Gabriel
Metro LA
West LA
South LA
East LA County
Valley
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
-55 -15%
-27
-2%
+12
+3% -844 -41% -235 -44%
+34 +11% -460 -35%
+9
+3% +239 +42% -279 -60%
+399 +17% -849 -12% +947 +50% +2,430 +56% -1,397 -50%
+254 +66% +34
+2% +123 +23% +353 +30% -374 -53%
-106 -22% +201 +33% +59 +18% +321 +54% -44
-19%
+526 +13% -1,101 -10% +1,150 +33% +2,499 +29% -2,329 -49%
Overall, in the Los Angeles CoC our homeless population is getting older. SPA 1 had
huge increases in almost every age category except for those under 18; SPA 2 had
the biggest increase in the Transitional Age Youth (TAY) population; SPA 3s homeless
population increased in those from 18-61 and decreased in those under 18 or those
62 and older; SPA 4 had decreases in their homeless population younger than age 55
while an increase in their 62 and older population; SPA 5 had increases in every age
group but particularly those 25-54; SPA 6 had big increases in every age group
except for those under 18; SPA 7 had big decreases in every age group; SPA 8 had big
decreases in every age group except for those aged 25-54.
12
SPA 8
South Bay
#
-285
-118
+242
-596
-220
-977
%
-47%
-22%
+7%
-41%
-30%
-14%

Homelessness by Subpopulation
Comparison of Service Planning Area (SPA) Homeless Subpopulation Totals, 2011 vs. 2013
SPA 1
Antelope
Valley
2011 2013
SPA 2
San Fernando
Valley
2011 2013
SPA 3
San Gabriel
Valley
2011 2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
10,901 13,613
209
2,176
1,489
2,085
1,149
1,147
2,175
2,092
1,076
1,029
2,073
2,960
1,078
491
1,652
1,633
2,730
1,227
67
95
93
185
324
86
578
242
207
126
679
277
203
105
579
111
15,489 16,892
14,830 16,229
8,131 6,248
1,104 511
238
287
90
14
2,550
2,287
826
61
1,228
1,643
554
149
2,563
2,397
900
71
1,849
1,472
381
106
1,360
1,348
533
45
3,691
4,419
1,656
634
2,840
2,957
1,216
109
1,169
1,670
1,004
25
1,369
1,370
546
47
2,803
3,023
1,069
113
3,528
3,337
1,266
101
1,734
1,283
856
6
673
684
276
24
2,777
1,033
2,521
57
2,009
1,849
685
53
4,610
4,827
211
618
245
687
697
416
1,078
968
292
429
841
972
561
218
685
519
9,993
9,790
143
1,280
1,239
1,405
754
838
2,199
1,924
1,080
860
1,964
1,980
1,563
436
1,051
1,067
LA CoC
Overall
2011
Chronically Homeless
Individual
Family Members
Substance Abuse
Mentally Ill
Veterans
Persons with HIV/AIDS
Survivors of Domestic
Violence
Physical Disability
2013
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
Metro LA
West LA
South LA
East LA County
South Bay
Comparison of Service Planning Area (SPA) Homeless Subpopulations Prevalence Rates, 2011 vs. 2013
2011
2013
SPA 1
Antelope
Valley
2011 2013
24%
25%
15%
31%
31%
27%
29%
26%
19%
20%
31%
22%
24%
26%
23%
20%
24%
28%
6%
2%
5%
1%
2%
2%
8%
2%
5%
2%
6%
3%
8%
2%
4%
4%
9%
2%
34%
33%
18%
2%
31%
30%
12%
1%
17%
20%
6%
1%
37%
33%
12%
1%
26%
35%
12%
3%
33%
31%
12%
1%
47%
38%
10%
3%
31%
30%
12%
1%
32%
38%
14%
5%
27%
28%
12%
1%
33%
48%
29%
1%
29%
29%
12%
1%
32%
35%
12%
1%
31%
30%
11%
1%
36%
27%
18%
<1%
28%
28%
11%
1%
41%
15%
37%
1%
35%
32%
12%
1%
10%
9%
15%
9%
5%
9%
18%
9%
9%
9%
8%
9%
10%
9%
12%
9%
10%
9%
22%
18%
10%
18%
26%
18%
19%
19%
19%
18%
31%
18%
22%
18%
33%
18%
15%
18%
LA CoC
Overall
Individual
Family Members
Substance Abuse
Mentally Ill
Veterans
Violence
Physical Disability
SPA 2
San Fernando
Valley
2011 2013
SPA 3
San Gabriel
Valley
2011 2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
13
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
Metro LA
West LA
South LA
East LA County
South Bay

2013
SPA 3 SPA 4 SPA 5 SPA 6
LA CoC
San
San
Metro
South
Antelope
Overall
Fernando Gabriel
West LA
Valley
LA
LA
Valley
Valley
SPA 1
Chronically
13,613 2,176
Homeless Individual
Chronically
1,227
95
Homeless Family
16,892 2,550
Substance Abuse
16,229 2,287
Mentally Ill
6,248
826
Veterans
Persons with
511
61
HIV/AIDS
Survivors of
4,827
618
Domestic Violence
9,790 1,280
Physical Disability
SPA 2
SPA 7
SPA 8
East LA
County
South
Bay
2,085
1,147
2,092
1,029
2,960
491
185
86
242
126
277
105
2,563
2,397
900
1,360
1,348
533
2,840
2,957
1,216
1,369
1,370
546
3,528
3,337
1,266
673
684
276
71
45
109
47
101
24
53
687
416
968
429
972
218
1,405
838
1,924
860
1,980
436
2011
SPA 3 SPA 4 SPA 5 SPA 6
LA CoC
San
San
Metro
South
Antelope
Total
Fernando Gabriel
West LA
Valley
LA
LA
Valley
Valley
SPA 1
1,633 10,901
SPA 2
SPA 7
SPA 8
East LA
County
South
Bay
209
1,489
1,149
2,175
1,076
2,073
1,078
1,652
2,730
67
93
324
578
207
679
203
579
2,009 15,489
1,849 14,830
685 8,131
238
287
90
1,228
1,643
554
1,849
1,472
381
3,691
4,419
1,656
1,169
1,670
1,004
2,803
3,023
1,069
1,734
1,283
856
2,777
1,033
2,521
1,104
14
149
106
634
25
113
57
519
4,610
211
245
697
1,078
292
841
561
685
1,067
9,993
143
1,239
754
2,199
1,080
1,964
1,563
1,051
111
Changes in Service Planning Area (SPA) Homeless Subpopulation Totals, 2011 - 2013
SPA 1
SPA 2
San Fernando
Valley
#
%
SPA 3
San Gabriel
Valley
#
%
+2,712 +25% +1,967 +941%
+596
+40%
-2
-1,503
-55%
+92
+99%
+1,403
+1,399
-1,883
+9% +2,312 +971% +1,335 +109%

+9% +2,000 +697% +754 +46%
-23% +736 +818% +346 +62%
LA CoC
Overall
#
Chronically
Homeless Individual
Chronically
Homeless Family
Substance Abuse
Mentally Ill
Veterans
Persons with
HIV/AIDS
Survivors of
Domestic Violence
Physical Disability
Antelope Valley
%
+28
+42%
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
Metro LA
West LA
South LA
East LA County
South Bay
-<1%
-83
-4%
-47
-4%
+887
+43%
-587
-54%
-19
-1%
-238
-73%
-336
-58%
-81
-39%
-402
-59%
-98
-48%
-468
-81%
-489
-124
+152
-26% -851
-8% -1,462
+40% -440
-23%
-33%
-27%
+200
-300
-458
+17%
-18%
-46%
+725
+314
+197
+26% -1,061
+10% -599
+18% -580
-61%
-47%
-68%
-768
+816
-1,836
-28%
+79%
-73%
-593
-54%
+47
+336%
-78
-52%
-61
-58%
-525
-83%
+22
+88%
-12
-11%
+18
+300%
-4
-7%
+217
+5%
+407
+193%
+442
+180%
-281
-40%
-110
-10%
+137
+47%
+131
+16%
-343
-61%
-166
-24%
-203
-2%
+1,137 +795%
+166
+13%
+84
+11%
-275
-13%
-220
-20%
+16
+1%
-1,127
-72%
+16
+2%
14

SPA 1
Antelope
Valley
2011 2013
SPA 2
San Fernando
Valley
2011 2013
SPA 3
San Gabriel
Valley
2011 2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
10,901 13,613
209
2,176
1,489
2,085
1,149
1,147
2,175
2,092
1,076
1,029
2,073
2,960
1,078
491
1,652
1,633
2,730
1,227
67
95
93
185
324
86
578
242
207
126
679
277
203
105
579
111
15,489 16,892
14,830 16,229
8,131 6,248
1,104 511
238
287
90
14
2,550
2,287
826
61
1,228
1,643
554
149
2,563
2,397
900
71
1,849
1,472
381
106
1,360
1,348
533
45
3,691
4,419
1,656
634
2,840
2,957
1,216
109
1,169
1,670
1,004
25
1,369
1,370
546
47
2,803
3,023
1,069
113
3,528
3,337
1,266
101
1,734
1,283
856
6
673
684
276
24
2,777
1,033
2,521
57
2,009
1,849
685
53
4,610
4,827
211
618
245
687
697
416
1,078
968
292
429
841
972
561
218
685
519
9,993
9,790
143
1,280
1,239
1,405
754
838
2,199
1,924
1,080
860
1,964
1,980
1,563
436
1,051
1,067
LA CoC
Overall
2011
Individual
Family Members
Substance Abuse
Mentally Ill
Veterans
Violence
Physical Disability
2013
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
Metro LA
West LA
South LA
East LA County
South Bay
Comparison of Service Planning Area (SPA) Distribution by Homeless Subpopulations, 2011 vs. 2013
LA CoC
Overall
Individual
Family Members
Substance Abuse
Mentally Ill
Veterans
Violence
Physical Disability
SPA 1
SPA 2
SPA 3
San Fernando
Valley
2011 2013
San Gabriel
Valley
2011 2013
2011
2013
Antelope
Valley
2011 2013
100%
100%
1.9%
16.0% 13.7% 15.3% 10.5%
100%
100%
2.5%
7.7%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
SPA 4
SPA 5
SPA 6
SPA 7
SPA 8
Metro LA
West LA
South LA
East LA County
South Bay
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
8.4%
20.0% 15.4%
9.9%
7.6%
19.0% 21.7%
9.9%
3.6%
15.2% 12.0%
15.1% 11.9%
7.0%
21.2% 19.7%
7.6%
10.3% 24.9% 22.6%
7.4%
8.6%
21.2%
9.0%
1.5%
1.9%
1.1%
1.3%
15.1% 7.9% 15.2% 11.9%

14.1% 11.1% 14.8% 9.9%
13.2% 6.8% 14.4% 4.7%
11.9% 13.5% 13.9% 9.6%
8.1%
8.3%
8.5%
8.8%
23.8%
29.8%
20.4%
57.4%
11.9%
11.4%
11.0%
10.4%
100%
4.6%
12.8%
8.6%
23.4% 20.1%
100%
1.4%
13.1% 12.4% 14.4%
8.6%
3.4%
5.3%
14.2% 15.1%
7.5%
15
2011
16.8% 7.5%
18.2% 11.3%
19.5% 12.3%
21.3% 2.3%
2013
8.1%
8.4%
8.7%
9.2%
18.1%
20.4%
13.1%
10.2%
20.9% 11.2%
20.6% 8.7%
20.3% 10.5%
19.8% 0.5%
4.0%
4.2%
4.4%
4.7%
17.9%
7.0%
31.0%
5.2%
6.3%
8.9%
18.2% 20.1% 12.2%
4.5%
14.9% 10.8%
22.0% 19.7% 10.8%
8.8%
19.8% 20.2% 15.6%
4.5%
10.5% 10.9%

Due to the increase in the total homeless number, Chronically Homeless

Individuals increased (+25%); however, the CoC noted decreases in Chronically
Homeless Family Members (-55%), People with HIV/AIDS (-54%), and Veterans
(-23%);
SPAs 1 and 2 experienced the greatest increases; SPA 4 had decreases in every
subpopulation followed by SPA 7
SPA 1 had major increases of over 600% in Substance Abuse (+971%), Chronically
Homeless Individuals (+941%), Veterans (+818%), Mentally Ill (+697%) and Physical
Disabilities (+795%)
SPA 2 had increases of over 100% in Survivors of Domestic Violence (+180%) and
Substance Abuse (+109%)
SPA 4 was the only SPA to have a decrease in every subpopulation with major
decreases occurring in People with HIV/AIDS (-83%) and Chronically Homeless Family
Members (-58%)
While SPA 7 had a decrease in almost every subpopulation, however, there was an
increase in People with HIV/AIDS (+300%)
16
Key Findings Supervisorial Districts

Changes in Supervisorial District (SD) Homeless Populations, 2011 - 2013

2013
LA CoC
Overall
SD 1
SD 2
SD 3
SD 4
SD 5
2011
2011 - 2013
Total
Homeless
Hidden
Homeless
Shelter &
Street
Count Only
Total
Homeless
Hidden
Homeless
Shelter &
Street
Count Only
53,798
18,274
35,524
45,422
10,800
34,622
+8,376
+18%
+902
+3%
8,063
17,976
12,319
4,840
10,600
0
5,309
3,948
2524
6,493
8,063
12,667
8,371
2,316
4,107
11,269
19,380
8,048
3,372
3,353
3830
4,529
1,007
809
625
7,439
14,851
7,041
2,563
2,728
-3,206
-1,404
+4,271
+1,468
+7,247
-28%
-7%
+53%
+44%
+216%
+624
-2,184
+1,330
-247
+1,379
+8%
-15%
+19%
-10%
+51%
Changes in Total
Homeless
Changes in Shelter &

Street Count Only
Total Homeless Counts, including the Shelter, Street and Hidden Homeless numbers:
SD 5 reflected the largest increase, followed by SD 3 and SD 4 with +216%, +53% and +44%,
respectively; there were decreases in SD 1 and SD 2 with -28% and -7%
When looking at the Shelter and Street Count numbers only, SD 5, SD 3, and SD 1
reflected increases of +51%, +19%, +8%, respectively, and SD 4 and SD 2 reflected
decreases of -15% and -10%, respectively
17

Comparison of Supervisorial District (SD) Homelessness by Household Type, 2013 vs. 2011
2013
Total
LA CoC
Overall
SD 1
SD 2
SD 3
SD 4
SD 5
Single Adults
2011
Family Members
Unaccompanied
Youth (<18)
Total
Single Adults
Family Members
Unaccompanied
Youth (<18)
53,798
46,303
86%
6,678
12%
817
2%
45,422
35,838
79%
9,218
20%
366
1%
8,063
17,976
12,319
4,840
10,600
6,245
15,289
10,758
4,292
9,719
78%
85%
87%
88%
92%
1,713
2,372
1,242
535
816
21%
13%
10%
11%
7%
105
315
319
13
65
1%
2%
3%
<1%
1%
11,269
19,380
8,048
3,372
3,353
9,186
14,740
6,744
2,695
2,473
81%
76%
84%
80%
74%
2,053
4,484
1,152
661
868
18%
23%
14%
19%
25%
30
156
152
16
12
<1%
1%
2%
<1%
<1%
Comparison of Supervisorial District (SD) Geographic Distribution of Homeless Households, 2011 vs. 2013
SD 1
SD 2
SD 3
SD 4
SD 5
LA CoC
Total
Total
2011
2013
11,269 8,063
19,380 17,976
8,048 12,319
3,372
4,840
3,353 10,600
2011
9,186
25.7%
14,740 41.1%
6,744
18.8%
2,695
7.5%
2,473
6.9%
45,422
35,838
53,798
Single Adults
100%
2013
6,245
13.5%
15,289 33.0%
10,758 23.2%
4,292
9.3%
9,719
21.0%
Family Members
2011
2013
2,053
22.3%
1,713
25.7%
4,484
48.6%
2,372
35.5%
1,152
12.5%
1,242
18.6%
661
7.2%
535
8.0%
868
9.4%
816
12.2%
Unaccompanied Youth (<18)

2011
2013
30
8.2%
105
12.8%
156
42.6%
315
38.6%
152
41.5%
319
39.0%
16
4.4%
13
1.6%
12
3.3%
65
8.0%
46,303
9,218
366
100%
18
100%
6,678
100%
100%
817
100%

2011 Comparison
19

Single Adult Homelessness
20

Family Homelessness
21

Unaccompanied Youth Homelessness
For the purposes of HUD

reporting, CoCs must be able
to report separately on
Unaccompanied Youth,
homeless children who are
under age 18.
Defining youth as under age
18 allows HUD to use the
same definition for all
reporting related to homeless
programs. Transition Age
Youth (TAY), or youth
between ages 18-24, are
counted as part of the Single
Adult population.
22

Changes in Supervisorial District (SD) Homelessness by Household Type 2011 - 2013

2011 - 2013
2011 - 2013
Changes
LA CoC
Overall
SD 1
SD 2
SD 3
SD 4
SD 5
Single Adults
Family Members
Unaccompanied
Youth (<18)
+8,376
+18%
+10,465
+29%
-2,540
-28%
+451
+123%
-3,206
-1,404
+4,271
+1,468
+7,247
-28%
-7%
+53%
+44%
+216%
-2,941
+549
+4,014
+1,597
+7,246
-32%
+4%
+60%
+59%
+293%
-340
-2,112
+90
-126
-52
-17%
-47%
+8%
-19%
-6%
+75
+159
+167
-3
+53
+250%
+102%
+110%
-19%
+442%
23

The Los Angeles CoC had an overall increase in homelessness

(+18%); there were increases in 3 of the 5 SDs with the
biggest increase in homelessness in SD 5 (+216%) and largest
decreases in SDs 1 (-28%) and 2 (-7%)
Single Adults increased in every SD except for SD 1 (-32%), with SD 5
having the biggest increase (+293%)
Family Members decreased in every SD except for SD 3 (+8%);
biggest decrease was in SD 2 (-47%)
Unaccompanied Youth increased in 4 of the 5 SDs with the biggest
increases occurring in SD 5 (+442%) and SD 2 (+250%). SD 4 is the
only SD with a decrease (-19%)
24

Homelessness by Shelter Type
Changes in Sheltered Homelessness by Supervisorial District (SD), 2011 - 2013

Total
LA CoC
Overall
SD 1
SD 2
SD 3
SD 4
SD 5
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
2013
2011
Changes
#
53,798
45,422
+8,376
8,063
11,269
-3,206
17,976
19,380
-1,404
12,319
8,048
+4,271
4,840
3,372
+1,468
10,600
3,353
+7,247
%
100.0%
100.0%
+18.4%
100.0%
100.0%
-28.5%
100.0%
100.0%
-7.2%
100.0%
100.0%
+53.1%
100.0%
100.0%
+43.5%
100.0%
100.0%
+216.1%
Sheltered
#
%
12,934
24.0%
16,882
37.2%
-3,948
-23.4%
3,183
39.5%
3,327
29.5%
-144
-4.3%
5,432
30.2%
8,956
46.2%
-3,524
-39.3%
2,755
22.4%
2,836
35.2%
-81
-2.9%
773
16.0%
929
27.6%
-156
-16.8%
791
7.5%
834
24.9%
-43
-5.2%
25
Unsheltered
#
%
22,590
42.0%
17,740
39.0%
+4,850
+27.3%
4,880
60.5%
4,112
36.5%
+768
+18.7%
7,235
40.3%
5,895
30.4%
+1,340
+22.7%
5,616
45.6%
4,205
52.3%
+1,411
+33.6%
1,543
31.9%
1,634
48.4%
-91
-5.6%
3,316
31.3%
1,894
56.5%
+1,422
+75.1%
Hidden Homeless
#
%
18,274
34.0%
10,800
23.8%
+7,474
+69.2%
0
0.0%
3,830
34.0%
-3,830
-100.0%
5,309
29.5%
4,529
23.4%
+780
+17.2%
3,948
32.0%
1,007
12.5%
+2,941
+292.1%
2,524
52.1%
809
24.0%
+1,715
+212.0%
6,493
61.2%
625
18.6%
+5,868
+938.9%

Homelessness by Age
Comparison of Supervisorial District (SD) Homelessness Age Totals, 2011 vs. 2013
SD 1
LA CoC
Overall
Under 18
18-24
25-54
55-61
62 & Older
Total
4,667
4,046
33,043
7,570
4,472
53,798
Gloria
Molina
1,087
619
4,663
1,074
620
8,063
2013
SD 2
SD 3
SD 4
SD 5
Mark
Zev
Michael D.
RidleyDon Knabe
Yaroslavsky
Antonovich
Thomas
1,713
990
327
550
1,389
931
354
753
10,908
7,621
3,046
6,805
2,504
1,745
696
1,551
1,462
1,032
417
941
17,976
12,319
4,840
10,600
SD 1
LA CoC
Overall
6,107
3,432
26,353
6,249
3,281
45,422
Gloria
Molina
1,309
941
6,801
1,350
868
11,269
2011
SD 2
SD 3
SD 4
SD 5
Mark
Zev
Michael D.
RidleyDon Knabe
Yaroslavsky
Antonovich
Thomas
3,010
829
399
560
1,087
945
362
97
11,256
4,353
1,835
2,108
2,834
1,237
554
274
1,193
684
222
314
19,380
8,048
3,372
3,353
Comparison of Supervisorial District (SD) Homelessness Age Prevalence Rates, 2011 vs. 2013
LA CoC Overall
Under 18
18-24
25-54
55-61
62 & Older
2011
13.4%
7.6%
58.0%
13.8%
7.2%
2013
8.7%
7.5%
61.4%
14.1%
8.3%
SD 1
Gloria Molina
2011
2013
11.6%
13.5%
8.3%
7.7%
60.4%
57.8%
12.0%
13.3%
7.7%
7.7%
SD 2
Mark Ridley-Thomas
2011
2013
15.5%
9.6%
5.6%
7.7%
58.1%
60.7%
14.6%
13.9%
6.2%
8.1%
26
SD 3
Zev Yaroslavsky
2011
2013
10.3%
8.0%
11.7%
7.5%
54.1%
61.9%
15.4%
14.2%
8.5%
8.4%
SD 4
Don Knabe
2011
2013
11.8%
6.8%
10.8%
7.3%
54.4%
62.9%
16.4%
14.4%
6.6%
8.6%
SD 5
Michael D. Antonovich
2011
2013
16.7%
5.2%
2.9%
7.1%
62.8%
64.2%
8.2%
14.6%
9.4%
8.9%

Homelessness by Age
Changes in Supervisorial District (SD) Homelessness Age Totals, 2011 - 2013

LA CoC Overall
Under 18
18-24
25-54
55-61
62 & Older
Total
#
-1,440
+614
+6,690
+1,321
+1,191
+8,376
%
-24%
+18%
+25%
+21%
+36%
+18%
SD 1
Gloria Molina
#
%
-222
-17%
-322
-34%
-2,138
-31%
-276
-20%
-248
-29%
-3,206
-28%
SD 2
Mark Ridley-Thomas
#
%
-1,297
-43%
+302
+28%
-348
-3%
-330
-12%
+269
+23%
-1,404
-7%
SD 3
Zev Yaroslavsky
#
%
+161
+19%
-14
-1%
+3,268
+75%
+508
+41%
+348
+51%
+4,271
+53%
SD 4
Don Knabe
#
%
-72
-18%
-8
-2%
+1,211
+66%
+142
+26%
+195
+88%
+1,468
+44%
SD 5
#
%
-10
-2%
+656
+676%
+4,697
+223%
+1,277
+466%
+627
+200%
+7,247
+216%
Overall, our homeless population is getting older. SD 1 had decreases in all of its age
groups. SD 2 had the biggest decrease in those under 18 (-43%), and increases in
the TAY population (+28%) and 62 and older (+23%); SD 3 had big increases in every
age category except for the TAY population; SD 4 had increases in those 25 and
older but decreases in those 24 and younger; SD 5 had significant increases in every
age category except for those under 18
27

Comparison of Supervisorial District (SD) Homeless Subpopulation Totals, 2011 vs. 2013
LA CoC Overall
2011
Individual
Family Members
Substance Abuse
Mentally Ill
Veterans
Persons with
HIV/AIDs
Violence
Physical Disability
2013
SD 1
SD 2
SD 3
SD 4
Gloria Molina
Mark Ridley-Thomas
Zev Yaroslavsky
Don Knabe
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
SD 5
Michael D.
Antonovich
2011
2013
10,901 24% 13,613 25% 2,289 20% 1,725 21% 4,419 23% 4,225 24% 2,205 27% 3,124 25% 1,055 31% 1,350 28% 933 28% 3,189 30%
2,730
6%
1,227
2%
819
7%
259
3% 1,348 7% 462
3% 169
2%
224
2% 259
8% 108
2% 135
4% 174
2%
15,489 34% 16,892 31% 3,963 35% 2,204 27% 6,918 36% 5,375 30% 2,556 32% 3,905 32% 1,210 36% 1,628 34% 842 25% 3,780 36%
14,830 33% 16,229 30% 4,216 37% 2,246 28% 6,140 32% 5,307 30% 3,108 39% 3,745 30% 628 19% 1,514 31% 738 22% 3,417 32%
8,131 18% 6,248 12% 1,020 9% 908 11% 3,788 20% 2,092 12% 2,073 26% 1,440 12% 865 26% 566 12% 385 11% 1,242 12%
1,104
2%
511
4,610 10% 4,827
1%
9%
318
3%
80
1,703 15% 717
1% 467
2% 177
1% 273
9% 1,605 8% 1,634 9% 694
3%
117
1%
0%
44
9% 1,111 9% 329 10% 431
1%
46
9% 279
1%
93
1%
8% 934
9%
9,993 22% 9,790 18% 2,527 22% 1,433 18% 3,931 20% 3,289 18% 2,008 25% 2,256 18% 873 26% 882 18% 654 20% 1,930 18%
28

Comparison of Supervisorial District (SD) Homeless Subpopulation Totals, 2011 vs. 2013
2013
SD 1
LA CoC
Overall
Individual
Family Members
Substance Abuse
Mentally Ill
Veterans
Violence
Physical Disability
Gloria
Molina
SD 2
Mark
RidleyThomas
2011
SD 3
SD 4
SD 5
Zev
Yaroslavsky
Don
Knabe
Michael D.
Antonovich
SD 1
LA CoC
Total
Gloria
Molina
SD 2
Mark
RidleyThomas
SD 3
SD 4
SD 5
Zev
Yaroslavsky
Don
Knabe
Michael D.
Antonovich
13,613
1,725
4,225
3,124
1,350
3,189
10,901
2,289
4,419
2,205
1,055
933
1,227
259
462
224
108
174
2,730
819
1,348
169
259
135
16,892
16,229
6,248
511
2,204
2,246
908
80
5,375
5,307
2,092
177
3,905
3,745
1,440
117
1,628
1,514
566
44
3,780
3,417
1,242
93
15,489
14,830
8,131
1,104
3,963
4,216
1,020
318
6,918
6,140
3,788
467
2,556
3,108
2,073
273
1,210
628
865
0
842
738
385
46
4,827
717
1,634
1,111
431
934
4,610
1,703
1,605
694
329
279
9,790
1,433
3,289
2,256
882
1,930
9,993
2,527
3,931
2,008
873
654
Changes in Supervisorial District (SD) Homeless Subpopulation Totals, 2011 - 2013

LA CoC Overall
Individual
Family Members
Substance Abuse
Mentally Ill
Veterans
Violence
Physical Disability
SD 1
Gloria Molina
#
%
SD 2
Mark Ridley-Thomas
#
%
SD 3
Zev Yaroslavsky
#
%
SD 4
Don Knabe
#
%
SD 5
#
%
+2,712
+25%
-564
-25%
-194
-4%
+919
+42%
+295
+28%
+2,256
+242%
-1,503
-55%
-560
-68%
-886
-66%
+55
+33%
-151
-58%
+39
+29%
+1,403
+1,399
-1,883
-593
+9%
+9%
-23%
-54%
-1,759
-1,970
-112
-238
-44%
-47%
-11%
-75%
-1,543
-833
-1,696
-290
-22%
-14%
-45%
-62%
+1,349
+637
-633
-156
+53%
+20%
-31%
-57%
+418
+886
-299
+44
+35%
+141%
-35%
-
+2,938
+2,679
+857
+47
+349%
+363%
+223%
+102%
+217
+5%
-986
-58%
+29
+2%
+417
+60%
+102
+31%
+655
+235%
-203
-2%
-1,094
-43%
-642
-16%
+248
+12%
+9
+1%
+1,276
+195%
29

Comparison of Supervisorial District (SD) Homeless Subpopulations Distribution, 2011 vs. 2013
LA CoC Overall
2011
Chronically
10,901 100%
Homeless Individual
Chronically
Homeless Family
2,730 100%
Members
Substance Abuse
15,489 100%
Mentally Ill
14,830 100%
Veterans
8,131 100%
Persons with
1,104 100%
HIV/AIDS
Survivors of
4,610 100%
Domestic Violence
Physical Disability 9,993 100%
2013
SD 1
SD 2
SD 3
SD 4
Gloria Molina
Mark Ridley-Thomas
Zev Yaroslavsky
Don Knabe
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
2013
2011
SD 5
Michael D.
Antonovich
2013
2011
2013
13,613 100% 2,289 21% 1,725 13% 4,419 41% 4,225 31% 2,205 20% 3,124 23% 1,055 10% 1,350 10% 933
9% 3,189 23%
1,227 100%
9% 135
5% 174 14%
16,892 100% 3,963 26% 2,204 13% 6,918 45% 5,375 32% 2,556 17% 3,905 23% 1,210 8% 1,628 10% 842
16,229 100% 4,216 28% 2,246 14% 6,140 41% 5,307 33% 3,108 21% 3,745 23% 628 4% 1,514 9% 738
6,248 100% 1,020 13% 908 15% 3,788 47% 2,092 33% 2,073 25% 1,440 23% 865 11% 566 9% 385
5% 3,780 22%
5% 3,417 21%
5% 1,242 20%
511
100%
819 30% 259 21% 1,348 49% 462 38% 169
318 29%
80
6%
224 18% 259
16% 467 42% 177 35% 273 25% 117 23%
9% 108
0%
44
9%
46
4%
93
18%
4,827 100% 1,703 37% 717 15% 1,605 35% 1,634 34% 694 15% 1,111 23% 329
7% 431
9% 279
6% 934 19%
9,790 100% 2,527 25% 1,433 15% 3,931 39% 3,289 34% 2,008 20% 2,256 23% 873
9% 882
9% 654
7% 1,930 20%
30

The Los Angeles CoC had increases in Chronically Homeless Individuals (+25%) and
decreases in Veterans (-23%), People with HIV/AIDS (-54%), and Chronically
Homeless Family Members (-55%); SD 1 had decreases in every subpopulation
followed by SD 2, while SD 3 and SD 5 both had major increases in every
subpopulation
SD 1 had decreases in every category with People with HIV/AIDS (-75%), Chronically
Homeless Family Members (-68%), and Survivors of Domestic Violence (-58%)
SD 2 had big decreases in Chronically Homeless Family Members (-66%) and People
with HIV/AIDS (-62%),
SD 3 had increases in every category with the largest increases in Survivors of
Domestic Violence (+60%), Substance Abuse (+53%) and Chronically Homeless
Individuals (+42%)
SD 5 had major increases of over 200% in Veterans (+223%), Survivors of Domestic
Violence (+235%), Chronically Homeless Individuals (+242%) , Substance Abuse
(+349%) and Mentally Ill (+363%)
31

2013 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

2013 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

2013 Greater