Disen Me

As not being a leader, logically there was no reason to understand what Disen Me meant, but curiosity to understand the meaning led to discovery of intent. Meanings of words over time seem to take on new meaning as such with the word mortgage, according to MerriamWebster: a legal agreement in which a person borrows money to buy property (such as a house) and pays back the money over a period of years. Attention is directed to a further meaning as implied by Merriam Webster: a conveyance of or lien against property (as for securing a loan) that becomes void upon payment or performance according to stipulated terms, which definition do we believe, definition 1 or definition 2 as it surely cannot be both definition 1 and definition 2 or definition 1 and/or definition 2. I say, imagine in your private life, if you decided that Im not going to pay my mortgage for a month or twofirst of all youre not saving money by not paying your mortgage. Youre just a dead beat. Barack Hussein Obama Moral Turpitude, if one was in belief that such only applied to sexual activity, boy what surprise, as an early definition can be found in Blacks Law defines Moral Turpitude extends to conduct that is contrary to justice, honesty and morality. Okiee Dokiee, applying honesty to those leaders of government and financial responsibility it can be assumed that many that are not presenting facts in an honest manner. Assumption and impression reaches beyond those few who support those violating Moral Turpitude as it appears intentions are to protect their personal interest. Conduct that is contrary to justice, honesty, or morality. In the area of legal ethics, offenses involving moral turpitude

- such as fraud or breach of trust traditionally make a person unfit to practice law. Question presents, if one in violation of Moral Turpitude is not fit to be an attorney would such equal that a lawmaker is not fit to be a lawmaker? (Hello Congress) BLT, whats that mean to you. Bacon, lettuce and tomato sandwich! Where everyday application of BLT one assumes that it is a complete sandwich, but where it is stated to be only BLT then be not surprised when you dinner arrives without bread. Words are precise but people tend to apply their own meaning and forget the fact of the matter. Yes it matters as to what words say and mean. Consider where statutory laws are not ambiguous (confusing), a judge with jurisdiction cannot/should not pay attention to comments(official or otherwise) or to any other external stimuli. It is not uncommon to see a party to a lawsuit surpass statutory meaning to apply another meaning that is not supported by law by referencing official comments or other alleged jurisprudence writings. Where statutory law is unambiguous and the argument is made in accordance to statutory law then one should consider standing on principles of law. This writer has not verified nor will an attempt be made to verify the presidents statement regarding the word Mortgage. If the statement is in fact true then it appears that the president has no clear understanding of the definition of Mortgage that is found in Blacks Law and other citable sources. Per earlier Blacks Law a mortgage is defined in part as: mortgage (mor-gij), n. 1. A conveyance of title to property that is given as security for the payment of a debt or the

performance of a duty [Given as Security][Mortgage is not the debt obligation] emphasis added by writer.

Appears the leaders of the worlds governments and financial institution (Central Banks, IMF, etc) have failed to understand their people or is it they have set themself at a table so as not to hear the people? Also appears that there is a belief that might makes right. Really do those without ears within government really believe the people believe might makes right. The next time Momma Right rings the diner bell, should one consider what type of table has been set? Maybe one should consider, was the table set by might or was the table set by a Government under God for the righteous? As time and meaning have changed over time, for this writer it is clearly visible that four worlds will have existed, Tangible, Intangible, Heaven and Hell. For those who live by tangible means have a choice between everlasting peace in Heaven of Eternal no rest in Hell, those who believe the Intangible gives rights to persecution have no choice remaining, may Satan have mercy on their soul, oops, error, Satan shows no mercy. Who do you Disen, Translation to understood English, why are you being disrespectful to me, could God be asking the same question? If one is right then one may be able to use might, not vice-versus! Maybe old momma wiser that she leads one to believe!!! Appears we have not leaders of free, appears we have leaders for greed. Is Moral Turpitude applicable, choice is yours