Site Suitability Report C07AR/CL008: Dormay Street

Autumn 2011
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

Dormay Street
Please note: Further details are provided in the Final Report on Site Selection Process (doc ref: 7.05) that can be found on the Thames Tideway Tunnel section of the Planning Inspectorates web site.
110-RG-PNC-C07AR-000588 | Autumn 2011

Dormay Street
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street
Thames Tunnel Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

List of contents
Page number
Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 Purpose and structure of the report ......................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................. 1 Consultation............................................................................................. 2 Site and surroundings .............................................................................. 2 Type of site .............................................................................................. 3
Site information ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 2.2
3 4
Proposed use of site construction phase ................................................... 4 Proposed use of site operational phase ..................................................... 4 4.1 4.2 Introduction .............................................................................................. 4 Restoration and after-use ........................................................................ 5 Access ..................................................................................................... 5 Construction works considerations .......................................................... 6 Permanent works considerations............................................................. 7 Health and safety..................................................................................... 7 Introduction .............................................................................................. 7 Planning applications and permissions.................................................... 7 Planning context ...................................................................................... 8 Planning comments ................................................................................. 9 Introduction ............................................................................................ 10 Transport ............................................................................................... 10 Archaeology........................................................................................... 10 Built heritage and townscape................................................................. 11 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water ............................. 11 Ecology .................................................................................................. 12 Flood risk ............................................................................................... 12 Air quality ............................................................................................... 12
Engineering assessment ................................................................................. 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
Planning assessment ...................................................................................... 7 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4
Environmental appraisal ............................................................................... 10 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8
7.9 7.10 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6
Noise ..................................................................................................... 12 Land quality ........................................................................................... 12 Introduction ............................................................................................ 13 Socio-economic profile .......................................................................... 13 Issues and impacts ................................................................................ 13 Introduction ............................................................................................ 14 Crown land and special land comments ................................................ 14 Land to be acquired ............................................................................... 14 Property valuation comments ................................................................ 15 Disturbance compensation comments................................................... 15 Offsite statutory compensation comments ............................................. 15 Site acquisition cost assessment ........................................................... 15 Introduction ............................................................................................ 15 Engineering ........................................................................................... 15 Planning................................................................................................. 16 Environment .......................................................................................... 16 Socio-economic and community ............................................................ 16 Property ................................................................................................. 17
Socio-economic and community assessment............................................. 13
Property assessment ..................................................................................... 14
Site conclusions by discipline ...................................................................... 15
Appendices ............................................................................................................. 19 Appendix 1 Sources of information Appendix 2 Site location plan Appendix 3 Planning and environment plans Appendix 4 Photographs of the site and surroundings Appendix 5 Transport plan Appendix 6 Services and geology plan Appendix 7 Construction phase layout Appendix 8 Operational phase layout Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables
ii
List of tables
Page number
Table 3.1 Construction phase data ............................................................................ 4 Table 4.1 Operational phase data ............................................................................. 5
List of abbreviations AOD BAP BT CPO CSO DLR EA GLA HGV LNR LPA LU m MOL ONS ORN PLA POS PTAL SAM SINC SNCI SSR SSSI SUDS TfL TD above Ordnance Datum biodiversity action plan British Telecom compulsory purchase order combined sewer overflow Docklands Light Railway Environment Agency Greater London Authority heavy goods vehicle local nature reserve local planning authority London Underground metre/metres Metropolitan Open Land Office of National Statistics Olympic Route Network Port of London Authority public open space public transport accessibility level scheduled ancient monument site of importance for nature conservation site(s) of nature conservation importance site suitability report site(s) of special scientific interest sustainable urban drainage systems Transport for London tunnel datum
iii
TLRN TPA UDP UXO
Transport for London Road Network Thames Policy Area unitary development plan unexploded ordnance
iv
1 1.1
1.1.1
Introduction Purpose and structure of the report

The Site selection methodology paper (May 2009 and revised August 2011) a outlines the process to be used to create the preferred list of main tunnel sites, and this process also applies to CSO sites. Paragraph 2.3.31 lists the type of general considerations that will be addressed in each site suitability report. Whether a consideration is relevant to the assessment of a site will depend on available information and professional judgement. This report was prepared through the assessment of information from the perspective of a number of technical disciplines: engineering, planning, environment, property and community. The reports have been prepared on the basis of the information listed in Appendix 1 and this level of information is considered to be appropriate to this stage of assessment. The Site selection background technical paper provides information on the requirements for different types of sites, their sizes and typical activities/ facilities within the sites. Each site suitability report considers a particular site on its own merits. In addition, an Engineering options report was produced, which relates to main tunnel and connection tunnel options. Information from both of these reports will feed into the technical assessment of how well the site may fit in with tunnel design options, ensuring combinations of sites spread across the length of the tunnel route provide a reasonable spatial distribution of sites (that will best assist with the construction of the tunnel, operation and maintenance). The outcomes are reported in the Phase two scheme development report.
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.2
1.2.1
Background
The process for selecting sites is set out in the Site selection methodology paper. All sites have previously passed through the following parts of Stage 1: Part 1A Creation of the long list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites Part 1B Creation of a short list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites o o o Table 2.2: Long list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites an assessment against set considerations and values Table 2.3: Draft short list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites assessment against a list of more detailed considerations Workshops to consider each site to arrive at a short list of sites.
The amendments made in August 2011 do not change the site selection methodology process. The amendments only related to the introduction of a second phase of consultation (paragraphs 2.3.13-2.4.15) and minor factual updates.
Page 1
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 1.2.2 The final part of Stage 1 includes this report. The following is an overall summary of all elements that apply to all the sites on the final short list: Part 1C Creation of the preferred list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites site data, site visits, site suitability reports, engineering options report and optioneering workshops that are reported in the Phase two scheme development report.
1.2.3
The Site selection methodology paper also contains a provision for a back-check process in paragraph 2.5.6 that states: If any sites for any of the main tunnel sites or intermediate sites (or CSO site) are eliminated for any reason, if there are significant changes of circumstances in relation to existing sites or combinations of sites, if new or replacement sites are required or found or if the engineering design develops in unexpected ways then a targeted repeat of stages 1-3 will need to be undertaken in order to fill in any site gaps.
1.3
1.3.1
Consultation
Thames Waters approach to engagement and consultation for the Thames Tunnel project is outlined in the Statement of Community Consultation and the accompanying Community Consultation Strategy. Thames Water has engaged regularly with all potentially affected London local authorities, other stakeholders and interested parties on sites and the project. Phase one consultation has been completed for all the preferred and shortlisted sites along with the three main tunnel route options. The analysis of the consultation responses is set out in the Report on phase one consultation and Interim engagement report. Any relevant site comments were considered at the post phase one consultation optioneering workshops. The outcomes of these workshops are reported in the Phase two scheme development report. After the workshops, engagement on sites has continued with key stakeholders, and the engineering design for sites has also continued in parallel. In autumn 2011, phase two consultation will provide another opportunity for people to comment on sites.
1.3.2
2 2.1
2.1.1
Site information Site and surroundings

This site is one of the back-check shortlisted sites for Frogmore Storm Relief Bell Lane Creek CSO. This section provides an overview of all the site information that will be used by one or more disciplines to assess the site in sections 3 to 9 of this report. The proposed site forms part of the Frogmore Complex, an industrial estate comprising various industrial units with associated loading/ unloading areas and car parking. The Causeway Island to the north of Bell Lane Creek is also required as a temporary working area during construction. The island is currently used for open storage of motor vehicles and materials. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 2.
2.1.2
Page 2
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 2.1.3 The site is bound by Bell Lane Creek to north, The Causeway to the east and the London Borough of Wandsworth maintenance depot to the west. The south of the site backs onto further clusters of industrial buildings along Dormay Street, including Wentworth House, a Grade II listed building. The Crane Public House, adjoining cottages and terraced properties are located further south, at the junction of Dormay Street and Armoury Way. Existing access is taken from Dormay Street. The wider area is mixed, comprising commercial, industrial and residential uses. The Frogmore Complex forms part of a wider industrial designation, which extends across the surrounding area. The nearest residents are located within nos. 16 to 20 Armoury Way. The proposed shaft location is set approximately 80m away from the rear facades of these properties. The site falls within other designated areas of the Wandsworth Local Development Framework. These include a locally significant industrial area and an archaeological priority area, as well as allocations in the emerging Site Specific Allocations Document. The site is also partly within the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area and in close proximity to listed buildings. All the mapped designations, where data was available, are shown on the planning and environment plans in Appendix 3. Photographs of the site and surroundings, together with an aerial photograph of the site, are attached as Appendix 4. A preliminary transport plan for the site is attached as Appendix 5. Third-party assets and significant utilities are listed below and are shown on the services and geology plan in Appendix 6: 2.1.11 The river wall which forms the northern site boundary High-voltage power substation in the northeast corner of the site EDF power tunnel under the River Wandle, adjacent to the eastern site boundary Buildings within the Local Borough of Wandsworth Depot The Grade II listed house and warehousing south of the site.
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.10
The locations of other third-party assets, such as BT and fibre optic communication cables, are to be confirmed by further studies and utility searches and may not be shown on the services drawing. Information on the geology specific to this site can be found within the services and geology plan, which is in Appendix 6. This plan shows that the drop shaft would be founded in London Clay.
2.1.12
2.2
2.2.1
Type of site
The site C07AR/CL008 is being considered as a large CSO site to intercept the Frogmore Storm Relief Bell Lane Creek (CS07A) CSO and to drive a connection tunnel.
Page 3
3
3.1.1
Proposed use of site construction phase

The proposed construction phase layouts for the CSO site are located in Appendix 7 Construction phase layout, and are based on a preliminary assessment. The construction phase layout drawings are illustrative and show: the layout as a CSO site potential access points.
3.1.2
3.1.3
These drawings provide initial preliminary schematic layouts that have not been optimised. If the site proceeds to the next stage as a preferred site, construction phase layouts would be optimised to minimise impacts. Photographs of typical activities associated with the CSO construction phase are provided in Appendix 7. Potential above-ground construction features include: approximately 3m high hoarding around the site boundary welfare facilities, temporary structures, approximately 3m high grout plant, approximately 3m to 5m high, including silos mobile crane, approximately 30m high (maximum and not for full construction duration). Bailey bridge over Bell Lane Creek to connect the two separate worksites.
3.1.4
3.1.5
Preliminary data associated with the construction phase are provided in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Construction phase data Activity Length of construction period Likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) Working days Primary means of transporting excavated material away from site Primary means of transporting materials to site CSO site 2 - 4 years 12 hrs from 7am to 7pm Mon to Sat Road Road
4 4.1
4.1.1
Proposed use of site operational phase Introduction

The indicative operational phase layout for the CSO site is located in Appendix 8 Operational phase layout, and is based on a preliminary assessment.
Page 4
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 4.1.2 The generic elevations of structures shown on the operational phase layout are located in Appendix 8 and provide an illustration of typical examples of the permanent structures which are applicable to CSO sites. The underground infrastructure at this site would likely comprise an interception chamber, double flap valve chamber and a drop shaft with access openings. The above-ground infrastructure at this site would likely comprise a ventilation column and electrical control kiosk. The top structures are envisaged to be finished at a minimum level of 104.5m(AOD+100), and since the ground mean level at this site is 104.5m(AOD+100), the top structures would be flush with the current ground level. The top structure is to provide access and egress into the drop shaft and flap valve chamber. A hardstanding would be provided to the top structures. The site would not be fenced. Preliminary data associated with the operational phase are provided in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Operational phase data Level of inspections and maintenance and likely working hours, ie, (night/day/ weekend) frequency of visits No. of traffic movements One daytime visit every six months for electrical/instrument inspection. An additional one-week maintenance period for tunnel/shaft inspection required per ten years that could be night/day/weekend working. One van visit every six months. An additional one-week period of two to ten movements per day (estimated several vans and two cranes) every ten years.
4.1.3
4.1.4 4.1.5
4.1.6 4.1.7
4.2
4.2.1
Restoration and after-use

The portion of the site not occupied by the permanent works would be restored to its original condition on completion of the construction works. If any buildings were demolished, these would not be reinstated unless required.
5 5.1
5.1.1 5.1.2
Engineering assessment Access

This section should be read in conjunction with Section 7.2. The site can be reached via an existing road, Dormay Street, which is directly off the A217 (Armoury Way, TLRN). The site could also be accessed via construction of a new temporary entrance from The
Page 5
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Causeway, which also connects with the A217 via a short length of Dormay Street. 5.1.3 Dormay Street leads to a local authority maintenance depot. It is expected that this road will be busy at certain hours of the day. Operational access post construction will be via Dormay Street. Access between the two separate worksites could be via The Causeway or via construction of a temporary Bailey bridge across Bell Lane Creek.
5.1.4
Rail
5.1.5 There would be no rail network local to this site. However, rail access is not considered to be a significant factor for CSO sites.
River
5.1.6 The site will be adjacent to Bell Lane Creek and approximately 350m from the River Thames. There is probably insufficient water depth to allow barges to service this site. It is unlikely that jetty/wharfage facilities can be developed in this location. However, river access and jetty/wharfage facilities are not a requirement for CSO sites.
5.2
5.2.1
Construction works considerations

The site is currently used as a contractors depot and is occupied by three one-storey workshop/warehouse buildings. Demolition of two of these buildings, and possibly all three, depending on site layout, would be required to create space for the shaft and associated working area. This site is located in London Clay (see Appendix 6). Where drop shafts would be in London Clay, it is assumed they would be to be constructed using precast concrete segmental shaft linings and underpinning techniques. There are no apparent geological constraints. Access to Causeway Island (CL008) would be required for the construction phase. The existing third-party owned road along The Causeway crosses a weight-restricted bridge (10t maximum vehicle load with no more than 6t on any single axle) which also carries a large number of HV cables. Temporary bridging between sites could be considered as an alternative to The Causeway, although this would be complicated as the Keltbray site is bounded by a flood defence wall approximately 1.2m high. The gravity masonry river wall which forms part of the Keltbray site boundary along Bell Lane Creek is in poor structural condition and would likely require strengthening prior to construction. Data available on third-party assets and significant utilities shows the key consideration to be the river wall which forms the northern site boundary. Other assets of note include a high-voltage substation located in the northeast corner of the site, an EDF power tunnel which runs under the River Wandle to the east, a single-storey brick building and vehicle shelter located in the council depot to the west, and a Grade II listed building and warehouses to the south. The railway embankment to the north would be
5.2.2
5.2.3
5.2.4
5.2.5
Page 6
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 90m from the proposed drop shaft and is unlikely to be impacted by the works. 5.2.6 Settlement assessments and potential monitoring of the listed building, warehousing and building within the council depot would be required to assess the impact of shaft settlement on them. Construction methods would be adopted, as appropriate, to mitigate potential settlement of these assets. The interception chamber and connection culvert would need to be constructed outside the site within the council depot and would require the demolition of the vehicle shelter. It is likely that the proposed CSO can be constructed within the overall construction programme.
5.2.7
5.2.8
5.3
5.3.1 5.3.2 5.3.3
Permanent works considerations

Access to the permanent works would be directly from Dormay Street. The electrical kiosk and ventilation tower would be located on or close to the hardstanding. The top structures for the shaft and valve chamber would be flush with the existing ground level.
5.4
5.4.1
Health and safety

Dormay Street would be shared with traffic using the adjacent London Borough of Wandsworth council depot and appropriate traffic management will be required. There are no other unusual health and safety issues with this site.
5.4.2
6 6.1
6.1.1
Planning assessment Introduction

The planning assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Planning applications and permissions Planning context Planning comments.
6.2
6.2.1
Planning applications and permissions

An initial desktop search of the London Borough of Wandsworth online planning applications database did not identify any current planning applications or extant permissions submitted within the last five years applicable to the Keltbray area of the site at Dormay Street. However, a conservation area consent application for demolition of large metal framed warehouse currently used as storage has been registered on 4 March 2011 for the Keltbray site. The decision is currently pending.
Page 7
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 6.2.2 The Causeway Island has a temporary, four-year permission, granted on 21 August 2009, for the continued temporary use of land as a street cleansing operations centre including office and sanitary accommodation and use of yard area of storage of vehicles, equipment and materials.
6.3
6.3.1
Planning context
The following is a summary of the relevant local planning policies and designations affecting the site and are taken from the current statutory development plan for the borough. The local plan comprises the Core Strategy, adopted October 2010, emerging submission versions published July 2011 for Examination in Public of both the Development Management Policies Document (DMPD) and Site Specific Allocations Document (SSAD), as well as saved policies from the Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan, adopted August 2003, and the London Plan 2011. The site is within a locally significant industrial area designated in the Core Strategy. Policies PL6 and PL7 seek to retain and maximise employment and industrial uses in these locations. Mixed-use development would also be considered within these designated areas, provided they do not compromise the overall range and quality of employment land available in the borough. The emerging DMPD Policy DMI 1, Strategic Industrial Locations (SILs) and Locally Significant Industrial Areas (LSIAs), and the SSAD identify B1(c), B2 and B8 as appropriate uses for the site. The site is within an archaeological priority area, partly within the Wandsworth Town Hall Conservation Area, and in close proximity to the Grade II listed Wentworth House. Emerging DMPD Policy DMS 2, Managing the Historic Environment, requires development to sustain, conserve and, where appropriate, enhance the significance, appearance, character and setting of the heritage asset itself and the surrounding historic environment. It also states developments which would disturb archaeological priority areas will need to be assessed and may require an archaeological evaluation report. Under Policy TBE14, Archaeological Priority Area, where development involves ground disturbance, the council will require developers to undertake an archaeological investigation. As appropriate, the council may, under Policy TBE15, require the preservation of findings either in situ or by excavation. Policy TBE10, Conservation Area, prohibits development which would harm the character, appearance and setting of a conservation area. Policy TBE13, Listed Building, states that development which would harm the setting of listed buildings is unacceptable. An existing green chain runs through the eastern area of the site. Core Strategy Policy PL 4, Open Space and the Natural Environment, and emerging DMPD Policy DMO 1, Protection and Enhancement of Open Spaces, both seek to protect and enhance the boroughs green chains.
6.3.2 6.3.3
6.3.4
6.3.5
6.3.6
6.3.7 6.3.8 6.3.9 6.3.10
Page 8
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 6.3.11 Policy ON7, Green Chain Links, prohibits development that would harm the open nature of any open land that contributes towards the Green Chain or link between open spaces, especially to Metropolitan Open Land and where they form strategic link between boroughs. The SSAD identifies the land to the east of the Causeway Island as an open area laid out as an ecological area. While the Local Development Framework does not assign any ecological designations in the area, the following policies should be noted: Core Strategy Policy PL 4, Open Space and the Natural Environment, DMPD Policy DMO 4, Nature Conservation, and saved UDP Policy ON8, Nature Conservation: All policies seek to prevent development which cause harm to designated areas and state development proposals should enhance, promote and aim to provide gains for biodiversity. The proposed shaft location is set approximately 80m away from the rear facades of nos 16 to 20 Armoury Way. Core Strategy emerging DMPD Policy DMS 1, General development principles Sustainable urban design and the quality of the environment, prohibits development which would harm the amenity of occupiers through unacceptable noise, vibration, traffic congestion, air pollution, overshadowing, overbearing, loss of outlook, privacy or sunlight/daylight.
6.3.12
6.3.13
6.3.14 6.3.15
6.4
6.4.1
Planning comments
A number of planning designations are applicable to the site, and to the adjacent land and buildings. The relevant planning policies identified are described in Section 6.3 and, of these, those relating to heritage and employment uses are of most relevance to the proposed development. The site is within an established employment area and use of the site for the Thames Tunnel project would generate employment opportunities during the construction works. Suitable employment uses in accordance with the locally significant industrial area designation could be discussed with the council post completion of the Thames Tunnel project construction works. The site falls within a designated archaeology priority area. Investigative and remedial requirements would need to be agreed with the LPA in accordance with policies DMS 2, TBE14 and TBE15 respectively. Further appraisal of the archaeological potential is provided in Section 7. The proposal site lies partly within the northernmost extent of the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. The adjacent building, Wentworth House, is a Grade II listed building and the entrance to the Frogmore Complex is designated under the same listing. The development may give rise to some conflicts with policies DMS 2, TBE10, TBE11 and TBE13, and mitigation would be required to avoid potential impacts from construction works and legacy structures on the appearance and setting of these designations. Further appraisal of the impact on the listed building and conservation area is provided in Section 7.
6.4.2
6.4.3
6.4.4
Page 9
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 6.4.5 The site is adjacent to the River Wandle and an ecological area is located on the eastern section of the Causeway Island. A temporary Bailey bridge is proposed to provide access between the construction sites. With appropriate mitigation, it is not envisaged that unacceptable impacts would arise from the use of this temporary access. The council also proposes up to three permanent bridge access points from Causeway Island in the emerging SSAD to increase the accessibility of the site for potential future redevelopment purposes. A further assessment of the potential ecological impacts is provided in Section 7. The proposal site is situated close to a residential area. The closest residential dwellings are located approximately 80m from the proposed shaft location. This separation distance should be sufficient to avoid unacceptable impacts, along with appropriate mitigation measures to reduce potential temporary disturbance from increased noise, dust and traffic movements.
6.4.6
7 7.1
7.1.1
Environmental appraisal Introduction

The following sections summarise specialist assessments which are provided in Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables.
7.2
7.2.1
Transport
This site is considered suitable as a CSO site, subject to further investigation of the potential use of the turning head at the end of Dormay Street, and the feasibility of HGVs accessing the site. A new access would need to be constructed. A temporary priority working system would need to be installed to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street. Potential road and rail access routes are considered to be suitable for HGVs as there are no other visible restrictions. Due to the small amounts of excavated material that will be produced, it is unlikely that rail access would be utilised. River access is not required for this CSO site. There is a reasonable possibility that the workforce would be able to use public transport to access the site. Some parking could be provided onsite for the workforce, however there would be no parking available nearby due to the double yellow lines along both sides of Dormay Street, and because many of the surrounding roads are designated as red routes. Temporary traffic management would be required to facilitate the priority working system on Dormay Street.
7.2.2
7.3
7.3.1
Archaeology
Based on the current information available, this site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site. The site has mid to high potential for waterlogged archaeological remains associated with revetment and possibly waterside industries which may have taken place along the creek. Buildings erected during the post-medieval period may have disturbed earlier remains but,
Page 10
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 given the location, the site may equally have been raised to reduce risk of flooding, possibly protecting earlier material. 7.3.2 A desk-based assessment is required to assess in detail the potential for archaeological remains at the site. An inspection of the pre-19th century map should provide a better indication of the potential past use of the creek.
7.4
7.4.1
Built heritage and townscape

In terms of built heritage, the site is considered to be less suitable as a CSO site. The proposals are within the curtilage of the Grade II listed Wentworth House and partially within the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. The indicative site layout would potentially require the demolition of structures within the conservation area. Due to the potentially historic nature of the structure/s to be removed, there is the potential for adverse impacts to the character and appearance of the conservation area. However, it is anticipated that the impacts would be minimal due to the existing industrial character of the area which is already detracting from the conservation area. Mitigation, in the form of a sensitive scheme layout to avoid the demolition of structures of potential historic value, could minimise the level of impact on the conservation area. A high-quality scheme design and/or screening would need to be considered in relation to the conservation area, also to ensure the settings of the Grade II Wentworth House and Grade II Stables at Ram structure are not adversely affected. In terms of townscape, the site is considered suitable as a CSO site because the proposals would have minimal impacts on views from surrounding areas including residential properties, and on the character of the industrial area. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality scheme design, screening and landscape treatment of the site, could enhance the local townscape character and views.
7.4.2
7.4.3
7.5
7.5.1
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water

In terms of hydrogeology, this site is suitable as a CSO site because the drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (a non-productive strata, previously called a non-aquifer). The Chalk piezometric head is likely to be approximately 5.1m above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected. The superficial deposits are alluvium, which is classified as a secondary aquifer at the shaft site. There would be a limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to sheet piling. In terms of surface water resources, this site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site, as there is no direct route for pollution to Bell Lane Creek. However, standard mitigation would be required in line with Pollution Prevention Guidelines 1 and 5 and Planning Policy Statement 23, with strict controls applied to the construction site boundaries and drainage.
7.5.2
Page 11
7.6
7.6.1
Ecology
This site is considered suitable as a CSO site, as it is only likely to require basic ecological surveys if selected. However, care would need to be taken to avoid contamination of the creek during Bailey bridge installation, use and spoil storage.
7.7
7.7.1
Flood risk
This site is less suitable as it is not fully protected from flooding from the River Wandle. There is limited space onsite for SUDS, and an investigation would be required to determine the suitability of infiltration SUDS. However, surface attenuation SUDS are likely to be sufficient to manage surface water runoff at this site.
7.8
7.8.1
Air quality
This site is less suitable for use as a CSO site from an air quality perspective. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site, therefore there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at these properties. These impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is also potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality. This could be somewhat mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
7.9
7.9.1
Noise
This site is suitable due to the distance between the site and residential properties located on Armoury Way. However, the number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route is likely to have an adverse noise impact due to the close proximity of residential receptors (the Crane Public House) to the proposed haul routes.
7.10
7.10.1
Land quality
In terms of land quality, the site is considered to be less suitable because of the high potential that contamination has occurred from historic activities onsite. These include a laundry works, a general works, commercial cleaning services and a waste disposal service which have the potential to impact on soils and shallow groundwater. Additionally, migration from offsite activities may have occurred through the shallow groundwater to beneath the site. The contamination would have the potential to impact on site workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact/vapour inhalation exposure pathways. Additionally, the potential exists for contamination of surface water receptors to occur through the migration of contaminants through the shallow (ie, river terrace gravel) aquifer.
7.10.2
Page 12
8 8.1
8.1.1
Socio-economic and community assessment Introduction

The socio-economic and community assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Socio-economic profile Socio-economic and community issues and impacts.
8.2
8.2.1
Socio-economic profile
The site is within the Fairfield ward of the London Borough of Wandsworth. Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data show the following indicators for the ward, in comparison to the rest of Wandsworth, London and England as a whole: A higher rate of full-time employees and self-employed people. A higher rate of employment in professional occupations. A substantially higher proportion of people educated to Level 4/5 (degree level). Fewer people aged 19 or under, or 45 and over (with comparably more people in their twenties and thirties). Approximately 82% people are white and around 75% of people were born in the UK. A higher proportion of residents reporting a good state of health.
8.2.2
Overall, this profile suggests that the population is not very ethnically diverse and consists mainly of young professionals.
8.3
8.3.1
Issues and impacts

The proportion of the proposed site to the south of Bell Lane Creek is owned by Thames Water and the whole site forms part of the Frogmore Complex, an industrial estate comprising various industrial units with associated loading/unloading areas and car parking. From a community perspective, it appears unlikely that the proposed construction activities will greatly impact the local community. The nearest community facilities and residential properties, the Crane Public House and adjoining residential properties are located at a distance from the proposed works. Therefore, given the scale of work proposed at this site and the general industrial nature of the surrounding area, if necessary, it should be possible to mitigate any impacts. Access to the site from Dormay Street and site related traffic may increase congestion to this industrial area. However, the impact of any construction noise, dust and vibration appears likely to be minimal as there appear to be no further sensitive receptors among surrounding land uses. There are no likely operational impacts from a community impacts standpoint.
8.3.2
8.3.3
8.3.4
Page 13
9 9.1
9.1.1 9.1.2
Property assessment Introduction

This report builds on the advantages and disadvantages in Table 2.3 and the assessment provides more up-to-date information. The site is being considered as a CSO interception site and comprises two separate areas: an area to the north of the Bell Lane Creek and an area to the south of Bell Lane Creek.
9.2
9.2.1 9.2.2
Crown land and special land comments

The area to the south of Bell Lane Creek is owned by Thames Water. The area to the north of Bell Lane Creek is owned by the London Borough of Wandsworth. As part of the acquisition of the Thames Water owned land to the south of Bell Lane Creek, Thames Water entered into an agreement with LB Wandsworth to use the area to the north of the creek should it be required during the construction phase. Therefore, there are no procedural risks associated with the use of this land. There is a substation on site but this can remain. It will be necessary to utilise an area of the creeks foreshore and riverbed for the construction of a Bailey bridge during the construction phase. This land is likely to be Crown land or PLA land. Crown land cannot be compulsorily purchased, therefore, there is a risk that this land cannot be acquired. PLA land can be compulsorily purchased but a compulsory acquisition that is opposed by the PLA will create risk. This area of Bell Lane Creek is not easily accessible by the public and does not appear to be used by the public. Therefore, if compulsory acquisition powers were exercised, it is unlikely to be considered open space for the purpose of S.131 of the Planning Act 2008. If the site is considered to be special land, a special parliamentary procedure would then be required unless exchange land is provided or the site is smaller than 200 square metres. Alternatively, it may be possible to avoid including land acquisition powers and instead rely on the PLA licensing regime. If temporary works powers only are required, this would not amount to land acquisition and the issue would not arise. Contact should be made with the owner as soon as possible to establish if an acquisition can be agreed.
9.2.3 9.2.4
9.2.5
9.2.6
9.3
9.3.1 9.3.2 9.3.3 9.3.4
Land to be acquired
The compensation assessment assumes that the worksite is either in Thames Water ownership or that it can be leased from the council. Airspace will be required to house the Bailey bridge linking the areas separated by Bell Lane Creek. Subsoil to house the connection culvert will be required. The land required during the operational phase is within Thames Water ownership.
Page 14
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 9.3.5 9.3.6 Permanent access rights will be acquired for the maintenance of the operational site. The area to the north of Bell Lane Creek is accessed by a private road, The Causeway, which is not included in the area to be acquired. This land will be accessed via the Bailey bridge, but if access via The Causeway is also needed, rights will have to be acquired from the owner.
9.4
9.4.1 9.4.2 9.4.3
Property valuation comments

The area required to the north of Bell Lane Creek has been assessed on a market value basis. Air rights for the construction of the Bailey bridge have been assessed on a diminution in value basis. The area to the north of Bell Lane Creek is accessed by a private road, The Causeway, which is not included in the area to be acquired. Therefore, the value of the land has been assessed reflecting the lack of access.
9.5
9.5.1
Disturbance compensation comments

All land is either within Thames Water ownership or can be leased from the council. There should, therefore, be no disturbance costs.
9.6
9.6.1
Offsite statutory compensation comments

There should be limited potential for claims under Section 10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 as the works are unlikely to interfere with property rights. There is limited potential for claims under Part 1 of the Land Compensation Act 1973, as the completed works are unlikely to result in diminution in value to property.
9.6.2
9.7
9.7.1
Site acquisition cost assessment

The acquisition costs are likely to be low. The site is suitable.
10 10.1
10.1.1
Site conclusions by discipline Introduction

The conclusions presented in this section are drawn from each disciplines assessment, and are designed to inform the workshop where a final conclusion on whether the site moves forward as one of the preferred sites or not.
10.2
10.2.1
Engineering
This site is suitable as it is has adequate vehicle access and sufficient size for construction of the CSO shaft and to drive a connection tunnel. The site is also within a short distance of the sewer to be intercepted.
Page 15
10.3
10.3.1 10.3.2
Planning
On balance, the site is considered suitable for use as a CSO site. The proposal site is unlikely to have an unacceptable impact upon residential amenity and appropriate mitigation should reduce potential impacts on the identified heritage designations. The site is within an established employment area, however conflict with the policy is not envisaged since the Thames Tunnel project will create employment opportunities during construction and the site could be returned to an employment use post completion of the works.
10.4
10.4.1 10.4.2
Environment
Overall, the site is considered to be suitable for use as a CSO site. The site is suitable from the perspectives of transport, archaeology, townscape, water resources (surface water and hydrogeology), ecology and noise. This site is considered less suitable from the perspectives of built heritage, flood risk, air quality and land quality. Overall, the site is considered suitable, and further investigation would be required as to whether built heritage, flood risk, air quality and land quality impacts could all be adequately mitigated. Likely mitigation considerations would include the following: Built heritage mitigation in the form of a sensitive scheme layout to avoid the demolition of structures of potential historic value could minimise the level of impact on the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. A high-quality scheme design and/or screening would need to be considered in relation to the conservation area. This would also need to ensure the settings of the Grade II Wentworth House and Grade II Stables at Ram structure would not be adversely affected. Flood risk mitigation to reduce flood risk to the worksite from the River Wandle. Air quality measures to ensure that dust is adequately mitigated at the closest receptors. Land quality any required remediation of contamination (at this high risk site) and/or measures to ensure no mobilisation of contaminants retained in situ.
10.4.3 10.4.4
10.5
10.5.1 10.5.2
Socio-economic and community

The use of the site is suitable from a community perspective. Any potential impacts on the Crane Public House and adjoining residential properties can be addressed. Use of the site may add to congestion in Dormay Street and on the surrounding streets so appropriate traffic management measures may be needed. Apart from this, it appears unlikely there will be any impacts on sensitive community receptors.
10.5.3
Page 16
10.6
10.6.1 10.6.2
Property
The advantages and disadvantages of the site from a property perspective are as follows. Advantages: The site is primarily in Thames Water ownership. There is an agreement in place to lease land outside of Thames Waters ownership. Acquisition costs will be low. There are no significant disadvantages.
10.6.3 10.6.4
Disadvantages The site is considered suitable from a property perspective.
Page 17
Page 18
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendices
Appendices
Page 19
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendices
Page 20
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 1
Appendix 1 Sources of information Engineering

Traffic Management and Access Roads/Rail URS Scott Wilson Access River BMT Isis Services (Utilities) and Third Party Assets Thames Tunnel and utility companies Geology British Geological Society and Thames Tunnel Construction and Operational Layout Template Thames Tunnel Site selection background technical paper Thames Tunnel
Planning
London Borough of Wandsworth online planning applications database Wandsworth Core Strategy, adopted October 2010 Saved policies in the Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan, adopted in August 2003 Emerging submission version of the Development Management Policies Document (DMPD) May 2011 Emerging submission version of the Site Specific Allocations Document (SSAD) May 2011 London Plan, adopted July 2011
Environment
Transport Map of Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) www.tfl.gov.uk Bus Route Maps: North-east, north-west, south-west, south-east www.tfl.gov.uk Crossrail Plans www.crossrail.co.uk/crossrail-bill-documents PTAL scores Obtained from Table 2.3 information Thames Path map www.walklondon.org.uk Capital Ring www.walklondon.org.uk Cycle Routes www.sustrans.org.uk and Local Cycling Guides 1-14 Design Manual for Roads and Bridge TD 42/95, Highways Agency
Appendix 1 Page 1
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 1 Archaeology Historic Environment data from Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service (GLAAS) National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens London Archaeological Archive and Research Centre (LAARC) Local authority websites Bing maps
Built heritage and townscape Local authority lists of Locally Listed Buildings National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens Unitary development plan and DPDs Local authority websites Bing maps
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Local authority details of unlicensed abstractors Environment Agency abstraction licence details Environment Agency groundwater levels and contour maps (2009-11) Environment Agency water quality (surface water and groundwater) Environment Agency Groundwater Source Protection Zones Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck British Geological Survey (BGS) logs BGS 1:50,000 Geological Sheets Solid and Drift Editions (England and Wales) BGS Geology of London Special Memoir for 1:50,000 Geological sheets 256 (North London), 257 (Romford), 270 (South London) and 271 (Dartford) (England and Wales) Crossrail (2005) Assessment of Water Impacts Technical Report: Appendix C Baseline Data. Figure C.4: Extent of Saline Intrusion based on 177 mg/l *5mmol/l) Isochlor
Ecology Thames Estuary Partnership (2002) Tidal Thames Habitat Action Plan London Biodiversity Action Plan www.lbp.org.uk
Appendix 1 Page 2
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 1 Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) www.magic.gov.uk statutory designated sites London Wildweb wildweb.london.gov.uk non-statutory site of importance for nature conservation Black redstart distribution in London www.blackredstarts.org.uk/ pages/.html National Biodiversity Network http://searchnbn.net - distribution of protected species Google Maps aerial views of habitat features BAP habitats www.natureonthemap.org.uk Priority habitats and species on national and local scales www.ukbap.org.uk
Flood risk Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Environment Agency National Flood and Coastal Defence Database Envirocheck
Air quality Local authority websites London Air Quality Network www.londonair.org.uk Defra UK-AIR, air quality information resource www.airquality.co.uk Defra Air Quality Management Areas http://aqma.defra.gov.uk Defra Local Air Quality Management http://laqm.defra.gov.uk
Noise Envirocheck Identification of receptors Promap Calculation of distances between site and receptors Multimap Aerial photography www.multimap.co.uk Defra noise maps Identification of existing noise levels
Land quality Google Maps/Earth Site walkover information Envirocheck Data Sheets provided as a GIS Database British Geological Survey (BGS) logs
Socio-economic and community

Statistics from the Office of National Statistics 2001 Census data
Appendix 1 Page 3
Property
Mouchel Land Registry information Multimap Promap Land Registry
Appendix 1 Page 4
Appendix 2 Site location plan
Appendix 2 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site CSO (Directly Controlled)
! (
WANDSWORTH
CS07A Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek
CL008
0 10 20 40
! (
60
80
100
C07AR
Metres
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02256 Date : .................................. 2011/10/27 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
Thames Water Utilities
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN C07AR SITE
Appendix 3 Planning and environment plans
Appendix 3 Page 1
TI AL
EN
M M M M M M M M M M M M M
M M M M M M M M M M M
NOR
M M M M M M M M M M M M
M M M
WAY
U SM
FI D
ER M OSIM M
M OAD SR
R LE GG
AY SW
Legend
Thames Policy Area River Walks Safeguarded Wharves
E RISM MENM M TERP
M M M M M M M M M M
M M
M M
Site Allocations Document Sites Mixed Use Areas Industrial Area Town Centres
Area of Main Map
&
Town Centre Other Frontages
AF T
Legend
Short Listed CSO Site
( !
SWANDON WAY
CSO (Directly Controlled)
SS M M A M TH P
D SU
A GE
EET R STR FERRIE

R IE MO
CL008
WANDSWORTH PLAIN
U MO AR
AY YW
RAM STREET
W LO AD RO
ET RE ST
( !
WANDSWORTH
C07AR
Y LE NS TO
15
30
60
90
120
Metres
O FR
O GM
RE
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
D OL
RK YO
RO
AD
R ST T EE
AR BARC H
D S TR
EET
N TO
EY SL
AC PL

FIE FAIR
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the M beM M M that M such M site M M selected M M M M M Mform part of the Thames Tunnel scheme. proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not taken to mean will be as a construction site to
N PUT B EY RID GE RO AD
ET TRE LD S
CHUR
CAR 'S TER D YAR
Title:
APPENDIX 3A PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT PLAN C07AR SITE
CH R OW
TI AL
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
ERS OSI
D RO A
Y WAGreen Corridor/Chains Sites of Metropolitan UG ! ! ! Nature Conservation Importance SM ! ! ! Sites of Borough Nature Conservation Importance S ER GL
Legend
FI D
EN
RISE ENTERP
WAY
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Open Spaces Deficiency Area 2008 Flood Risk Zone 3 Flood Risk Zone 2
Area of Main Map
&
AF T
Legend
( !
SWANDON WAY
E SAG PAS H T NOR

D SU W LO AD RO
EET R STR FERRIE

R IE MO
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
CS07A ! ! ! ! Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
CL008
ET RE ST
( !
WANDSWORTH
C07AR
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
Y LE NS TO
O FR
O GM
RE
D OL
RK YO
RO
AD
R ST T EE
WANDSWORTH PLAIN
AR BARC H
RAM STREET
D S TR
EET
N TO
EY SL
AC PL
U MO AR
RY
Y WA

FIE FAIR
N PUT B EY RID GE RO AD
ET TRE LD S
CHUR
CAR 'S TER D YAR
Title:
APPENDIX 3B PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT PLAN C07AR SITE
CH R OW
TI AL
EN
FI D
ERS OSI
D RO A
G UG SM
WAY
R LE
AY SW
Legend
Listed Building (point) Archaelogical Areas Conservation Areas
Listed Building (polygon)
&
RISE ENTER P
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
! (
SWANDON WAY
FERRIE R STR EET
ASS TH P NOR
AGE
CL008
R MO
WANDSWORTH PLAIN
!
N PUT EY
U MO AR
RY
Y WA
RAM STREET
D SU W LO RO AD
O FR O GM
S IE
! (
TR T EE
WANDSWORTH
C07AR
N TO
AD
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
EY SL
RE
!
D OL
RK YO
RO
R ST T EE
!
TREET ARD S BAR CH
N TO
EY SL
E AC PL

FIE FAIR
! !
D BRI GE AD RO
T LD S
CHUR
CAR 'S TER D YAR
APPENDIX 3C PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT HERITAGE PLAN C07AR SITE
Title:
REE
CH R OW
Appendix 4 Photographs of the site and surroundings
Appendix 4 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site CSO (Directly Controlled)
! (
WANDSWORTH
CL008
0 10 20 40
! (
60
80
100
C07AR
Metres
Title:
APPENDIX 4 AERIAL PLAN C07AR SITE
View of site C07AR looking north up Dormay street.
View of site C07AR looking north from Armoury Way over the River Wandle.
Appendix 4 Page 3
View from The Causeway looking west over Bell Lane Creek, with the Keltbray site to the south and Causeway Island to the north.
View looking east towards the entrance to the Causeway Island site (CL008) from The Causeway.
Appendix 4 Page 4
View looking south on Causeway Island (CL008) towards the Bell Lane Creek.
Appendix 4 Page 5
Appendix 4 Page 6
Appendix 5 Transport plan
Appendix 5 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
! (
CSO (Directly Controlled) Transport Access Route TfL Road Network Thames Path
London Cycle Routes
CL008
0 10 20 40
! (
WANDSWORTH C07AR
60 Meters 80 100
Narrow Road
Title:
APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN C07AR SITE
Appendix 6 Services and geology plan
Appendix 6 Page 1
1
House
2
e l d n a r W e v Ri
5
S R E L G G U M S W Y A 0 0
3
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
N
Milliners House
N
d Mu
GEOLOGY
AWAITING OS DATA
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
m m 0 5 1
8600 N.B.THIS MAIN TO BE ABANDONED
POSITION AND LAYOUT OF MAINS AND ASSETS NOT CONFIRMED

E U N E V SA D L E I F T S A E
CCL W
mm 50 1
Ground level 104 (m OD + 100) THIS DRAWING

nH a Me
Mud
hW g i r e t a
4201
7250
5 7 3
WB
100(m OD + 100) Base of Made Ground

m m 0 5 1
7101
Riverside House
PROPOSED #9599 W/R# 42QRPT

3103
3104
m m 0 5 1
Mud
r i e
and Superficial
d Mu
mm 50 1
7150 40 YARDS 6" MAIN LAID 31-7-69 5 7

3
5703 NF
E R I F
8
Bol
5 7 3
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY

WB
" 5
ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
M HW
6 2
4 "F I R E
0 0 3
2101
" 6
4"
4" RE FI
W er v Ri
3102
6.7m
3
m m 0 0 1
-
3096
P T
M S
" 5
1 2
WO
T H EC A U S E WA Y
Mud
4" EV
5832
3 2
0 4 o t 2 3
m m 0 0 1
0 60
2905
k e e e Cr n a L l l Be
9 1
Mu d
y d Bd r Bo r o Co n s t&Wa
3274
0 2
1 6"
0 2
El Sub Sta Works Factory Works El Sub Sta
Me a n Hi g hW a t e r
Be l l L a n e Cr e e k
NF
5.8m
1 1
3101
CCL W
Goods Shed
9
0 0 6
RELAID DEC 1938 APPROX 90 YARDS

0 o1 1t 2 1 2 3 o t 1
c 1
" 7
Works
4
FH
3001
0 0 6
d 1
b 1
CCL W
5.7m
2001
a 1
3 4 0 0
5 7 6
NF
WO
m m 0 5 1
" 7
S Br
R C
1005
B
5705
4.9m
i g hW a t e r
SB
4.6m
TP
225
FH
Me a nH
OSV 3118
3003
E T VA I R P
5 2 2
3002
" 6
4001
7 2
6 2
H T OR N
3005
3136
Works
SITE BOUNDARY
Warehouse Mud
6944
a t bS u S l E
Works
" 6
TP
2 2
1 50 mm
Works
3903
Mud
2902
" 3
3
E G A S S A P
Warehouse
6.0m
Works
5 22
CON 82S
MH W
FV
Mean High Water
Pipe
Bridges
E R I " F 6
T T
WO
" 6
Adelaide Centre
Mud
" 4
H T R O N
B e l l L a n e C r e e k
Mud
0402
LV
MLW
25
Depot
4905 3904
3/4" AP
r e t Wa h g i H n a e M
MLW
Sluice
5 1
3139
7.3m
1
4.9m
0 4
3902
FV
2901
LB
E D I A L E D A
Hilden House
0 30
1 "
Depot
2 7 3 1
3122
CA US EW AY
WB
7901
8900
LB
" 4 " 7 " 9

2 7 3 1
VT D L O
El
0 30
1 21 9
5901
3102 DBV006076
Sub Sta
2909
Pembridge Place
SE 4901
WO
ZBV030269
Works
AY
) DBV006075 E N
Garage
4
N I A M ( 1 . o N R " E W 4 E S V E L W O L L E
I L
WO D 8901 E BD N O D N A B A
TH E
7.0m
El Sub
V LE
Sta
1 6"
E 3" OR GM O R 3905 F
0 0 3
8914 VMH
3 "
7
WANDSWORTH
TP
" 6 3 " 5 1 " 4
The Roche School
DBV006074
1 2
0 0 3
3 "
2 "
3901
London Court
4 o t 1 2 1 o t 9
9 4
3119
Car Park
4806
6 1
WM
Works
e g d i r B e p i P
4505
0 6
1 1
3803
0407
6 "
" 6
6801
3094
" 4
2 7 3 1
GAS
15
- LOW PRESSURE ABOVE 300mm DIAMETER - INTERMEDIATE, MEDIUM OR HIGH PRESSURE 0 100 m
5
0 0 3
El
Works
63
WO
D E N O D N A B A
5803
8803
2805
2801
2806 2804
10
2851
3140
t o 6
FH
SE
VMH
LB
90 x 6
0 0 3
Stables
6 0 2
7802
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JM
AS
GT
23/10/2010
4 2 6 2
Ri v e rW a n d l e
AC
T E E R T DS R A H 5 C 5.2m 2 2 R A B
8802
1 6
2 o4 7t 3 4 o2 1t
3801
7.1m
o 1t
3"
4"
x 690
WO
6 3 o t 1 3
2 3
0 0 3
1 070 1 5"
1 372
6.2m
6009
6 1 o t 1 1 5
Lodge
1t o8
5 2
0 0 3
2 1
WO
4.8m
37 North Wharf Road,
WO
2 2
Citadel
" 6
0 0 3
VC
3 1 0 0
V E L
L E
1 . o N
8702
Paddington, London W2 1AF

Location Code: OS Reference:
t o
VT
4"
" 6
1t o8
21
7703
" 4
El Sub Sta El Sub Sta
an d
m m 0 9
0337
7.8m
2 2
3703
9100
Garage
Brewery
RAM STR EET
" 3
5 3 2 2
9 o1 9t
" 6
E S O L MC A H E R O H S
WO
W O L
5702
Salvation Army
F E I L E R
1t o8
Milton Court
ZBV030271
2702 3701
o 0t 2
a 1
E G A S S A SP T N I L A S L A
Garage
" 4
" < -4
070 1
0 3
WO
Posts
0 0 3
6704 4 " F I R E
Buildings
Site Name: Project Name:
C07AR - DORMAY STREET
36 "A BA ND ON ED
2 0 1
0 0 1
4704
3109
5 37
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
All Saints Church

5 22
Bank
8 9
CON 130 S 7701 IL-2.17m

0 5 1
1 CON 5 " 2S
4703 SU
NOW IN ROAD
d r a Y s m r A s g n i K
Drawing Title:
6 0 8 1 0 1
0 1 1
4701
3 6 " T R U N SE K 4702 3 3129 B 6 "A A N D O SE N E D

1 2 9 5
5701
4"
4 0 1
WW
6702
CON 2S
5.0m
SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN C07AR / CL008

Drawing No.: Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
3"
S E G A T T O HC S U B
WO
4613 VT
EV DC
VT
5.2m
D e f
DC
PH
9 6
DETAILS OF DIVERSIONS
9 2
PS
IL-2.13m
6 2 1
4 2 1
PLOTTED ON
02/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
8 PH 2 1 e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_2\dms04398\100-DL-PNC-C07AR-146001.dgn
D e f
1 5 " 3 6 "
Town Hall
Fn
5 2 2
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
b 6 4 1
3 "
7606 7605
" 4 100-DL-PNC-C07AR-146001
Works
5
3 1
" 3
3104
DRAIN PIT
1
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT

3 1 t o 3 8
r af t
Municipal
Location / Town:WANDSWORTH
- CS07AR - FROGMORE SR-BELL LANE CK
1:1000
A1
AB
5 0
2750
2 1 o t 1
3702
Ch i l d Gu i d a n c e Un i t
2 0
7 4
Y R OU M R A
4 2
1 21 9
0 o1 1t
PH
0 3
5 2
0 3
5 3 2 2
5 37
3111
8705
"
1
26 YDS 4" MAIN LAID 22-10-64 GUAR NO 6438

" 3
7702
W E S R E
3130
Studios
5703
8703
4489
3 1
5 2 2
" 4
1"
The Point, 7th Floor,
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2473
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS
LONDON TIDEWAY TUNNELS 1"
WASTE
1 0 0
T R E T S E H 2751 C
Y A
o8 1t
6088
mE m 0 0 NC 1 O
S O 2703L
TP
5 4
1 o1 1t
2 o1 1t
WO
295 1
3 4
ZBV030272
ZBV030266
375
1 4
1t o1 6
8 o t 1
9 4
o8 1t
4 2 o t 6 1
h t e b m a L t r u o C
o8 1t
E G D I R B
1 2
R A P
3120 K
3802
8 o t 1
8 2
4804
Wo r k s
"
2850
C I ER
l l mi e l d d Mi s e u o H e s u o H l i z a r B
3121
WO
4 3
" 6
4801
6802
8 3 7805
VMH
6 3
0 0 3
SE
" 4
e s u o gH n i t l o B
" 6
5.0m
" 4
0 0 3
1 2
4.8m
BD 7801
" 4
5 3 2 2
WO
2 1 o t 1
0 3
3106
3 1
8 1
9 1
0 2
VC
NF
8801
4 2
4 1
5 1
NF
8805
e r mo k c a l B e s u o H

6 2
on f i de nt i al
2803
" 6
6.4m
o6 1t t n go n i t n Hu r t u Co
3 1
4"
1 5 0
DW
2812
2811
Vauxhall Court
1 3 7 2
WO
4.1m
9 3
2 o1 1t
o8 1t
0 3 o t 5 2
6 o1 1t 1
2852
t C r e t s n i m t s e
2 2
4803
3131
3 2 0 0
VC
t aC e s l e h C
o8 6 5t o1 3t 1
WO
9 o1 4t 1
Brewers House
0 30
20
6 1
PH
WO
22
2 5
" 4
d 4
" 5
8 1
ZBV030270
a 4
5 o2 0t 2
6 "
5.0m
7804
3 4
0 4
t r u o C r o s d n i
Sub Sta
Y A YW R U MO R A
6.3m
2 2 5
10 m 3107
m m 0 8 1
SCALE 1 : 1000
8 o5 2t 4
WO ZBV030267 WO
e s u o eH n i V
s r e l l u F e s u o H
" 3
" 3
ZBV030268
070 1
4802
" 6
VC
D E N O D N A B A m m 0 8 1 9000
VC
375
Revision History
El Sub Sta
7807 SE
Horse Exercise Area PH
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AB
SECOND ISSUE
JMAB
PSTV
JSWE
28/10/2011
2 0 0 mm
3137
N I MA (
PH
4 6
" 5
o6 1t
3 "
8t o1 3
Works
5.6m
9 4 5 1 5 5
D R
Chy
C07AR (2288m)
3"
DO RM
3 3 0 0
e g n a h c x E
K R O Y
3 4 5
WO
" 3
GE A S S A P
3004
CL008 (2800m)
C U A W E S
RE 6" FI
RE 3" FI
y d B d r a &W t s n o C o r o B
" 3
Gas Holder
3117
4 1
m m 0 0 1
m m 0 5 1
2102
WO
2
Y EWA S I R P R E T N E
F B F B
e c i u l S
" 5 1
" 7
" 4 6101
WO
" 3
0 0 1
WO 6103
Suggested invert level of shaft 71.89(m OD + 100) THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE
6104
e dl an
>
4.4m
" 5 1
6102
P T
EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES SWANDON WAY WANDSWORTH SPS IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, LIMITED. FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER
Weir
5"
5 1
0 2
0 1
8 2 o t 1
3 3
3 1
6 o2 1t 6 o2 1t 8 1
00mm 1
8700
STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN
3097
4"
6 E T 9 F 2 1 . HA 9 N S 7 8 4 5 5 . 5 5 2 3 1 5 7
O ER SI S R O AD
5" 1
El Sub Sta Switch House
Base of London Clay Formation 54(m OD + 100)
SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
0 30
WO
SM U G
15"STEEL TUBE RENEWED <---24-9-36 0.75" AP
450mm VALVE WO AND 100mm BY-PASS

S W
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO THE TUNNEL DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
G R LE
4"
RE FI
7005 7006 7004
AY
0 5 4
NOTES: 1. LIMITED FIBRE OPTIC AND BT COMMUNICATION CABLES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. DETAILS OF THESE CABLES AND OTHER SERVICES AND THIRD PARTY ASSETS TO BE CONFIRMED BY FURTHER STUDIES AND UTILITY SEARCHES. 2. INVERT LEVEL OF SHAFT SHOWN. BASE OF CONSTRUCTION WILL BE BELOW THIS LEVEL AND WILL DEPEND ON CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE. THIS IS ONLY PROVISIONAL AS T E E R T RS E I R R DESIGN IS AT EARLY PRELIMINARY STAGE. E F
4"
0 1
825
4.8m
RE I 3" F
6" 1
Cable Bridge
7003
Base of Lambeth Group 33(m OD + 100)
RE I mF 50m 1 RE m FI 50m 1
Mud
t c u d a i V
Base of Thanet Sand Formation

m 0m 45
P5 M
22(m OD + 100)
Delta Park
Mud
6943
0 45
8800
LEGEND
FW
7002
e l d n a rW e v Ri
FW
FOUL WATER
TH
E
SW
SW
SURFACE WATER
" 3
D E R E T E M
8 2
D SU OW L
CLEAN WATER
1 Y A
9 2
" 6
4"
4" 9"
Chalk
G G
9"
mm 00 1
1 o3 1t
RO AD
4"
0 3
GAS
1 3
34
0 30
CABTV
CABTV
FIBRE OPTICS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
4"
LV
LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
SYNTHETIC GEOLOGICAL PROFILE DERIVED FROM THE BGS LONDON LITHOFRAME50 MODEL, HISTORICAL BOREHOLES AND BERRY (1979). PLEASE NOTE, GROUND CONDITIONS MAY VARY AND THIS DATA SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR DETAILED D A ENGINEERING PURPOSES O
O AND SW
HV
HV
HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES
EXISTING TUNNELS
90
4 "
mm 00 1
y r ge ur S
" 9
5 9 2 1
"C 7 T
mm 00 1
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
WATER - ALL TW ASSETS - ALL TW ASSETS
AY NW
D SU
s B
OW L
RO
AD
6 4
70
W LO
t 6 r o t ou 1 C on t er v l A
STORM & FOUL SEWERS
4"
OTHER SIGNIFICANT UTILITIES ARE DEFINED AS:

n ol nc Li
1 o t 6
4"
1 5
T STREE
EL
9" 7"
5 29 1
" 4
TELECOMS
5
- ONLY FIBRE OPTIC CABLES - HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES - LARGE BANKS OF LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
6 6
" 3
W SE ER 1 . No
t r ou
00 3
ELECTRICITY
TO
375
2 6
c 0 6 d 0 6
Y LE S
) NE LI
4"
a 0 6 b 0 6
NED 5" 1 NDO ABA 36"
TR S
4"
4"
T E E
o t
8
9 21 1
t r u d Co l e i f r i Fa
6"
6"
5 22
RE FI
RE FI
4"
6
1 o t
3"
DGE ROAD PUTNEY BRI
o 7t 5 1
9"
4" 7"
o 2t 8 3
5 37
2"
ON CS E OS CL
3"
yC e s l Se
3"
o 1t 6
t r u o
0 3
N AI W ANDSW ORTH PL
mm 25 1 mm 25 1
o 0t 2 2 2
----->
1 o t 12
T EE TR DS EL I RF I FA
4"
4"
5 22
7t o9
s k r Wo
e c i f Of t v Go
4" 7"
9"
W LO L VE LE R WE SE 1 . No N I MA (
w o hR " c r u 5 1 Ch
5"
5" 1
90 x 6
3"
S ER RT CA
4 1
5 29 1
9 21 1
4"
3"
7"
9"
RD YA
) NE LI
Appendix 7 Construction phase layout
Appendix 7 Page 1
6
Status:
Mud
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
e l d n a rW e v Ri
i g hW a t e r
4.6m
THIS DRAWING
Me a nH
TH E C
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
250m
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN TEMPORARY WORKING AREA = 2027m SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
U A W E S Y A
Mud
600m
CL008
PARKING, VEHICLE MARSHALLING AND SITE TRAFFIC ROUTES
OFFICES AND CANTEEN
Mud
B
200m
MH W
INTERCEPTION CHAMBER 1.5m CONNECTION CULVERT
Mean High Water
P i p e
Bridges
Mud
VALVE CHAMBER
KEY:
TEMPORARY BAILEY BRIDGE EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND HANDLING AREA
STOCKYARD, WORKSHOP AND STORES
WELFARE
Mud
OFFICES, WELFARE AND CANTEEN
MLW
EXISTING POWER SUBSTATION
Sluice
CSO DROP SHAFT, CSO CONNECTION CULVERT, PRIMARY CRANE, SECONDARY CRANE AND CSO INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
r e t a W h g i H n a e M
600m 50m
MLW
4.9m
CSO DROP SHAFT 12m ID DISCLAIMER: INDICATIVE CONSTRUCTION PHASE ARRANGEMENT. BASED ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT.
100m PRIMARY CRANE
Chy
POWER SUPPLY
C07AR
10 m
10 m
Depot
SECONDARY CRANE
SCALE 1 : 250 PARKING, VEHICLE MARSHALLING AND SITE TRAFFIC ROUTES
CA US EW AY
WB
Revision History
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AB AA
SECOND ISSUE FIRST ISSUE
JMAB JM
PSTV AS
JSWE GT
28/10/2011 23/10/2010
TEMPORARY WORKING AREA = 1650m
ACCESS/EGRESS
an d
Works
C07AR SITE BOUNDARY AREA = 2288m

Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2473
UBR
Sub Process:
JBRO
LONDON TIDEWAY TUNNELS

Location / Town: Site Name: Project Name:
WASTE 5 0 0
WANDSWORTH - CS07AR - FROGMORE SR-BELL LANE CK C07AR - DORMAY STREET
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
Works
PLOTTED ON 14/11/2011 BY LOCATION : e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_4\dms04398\100-DL-PNC-C07AR-146002.dgn
CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT C07AR / CL008 - CSO + CSO CT DRIVE

100-DL-PNC-C07AR-146002
r af t
1:250
A1
AB
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
TH E
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
DO
RM
AY
T STREE
Appendix 8 Operational phase layout
Appendix 8 Page 1
6
Status:
Mud
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
e l d n a rW e v Ri
i g hW a t e r
4.6m
THIS DRAWING
Me a nH
TH E C U A W E S Y A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
Mud
Mud
B
MH W
CSO INTERCEPTION CHAMBER VENTILATION CHAMBER VENT COLUMN
Mean High Water
P i p e
Bridges
Mud
Mud
CSO DROP SHAFT 12m ID
2m x 0.6m x 1.5m HIGH ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK
MLW
Sluice
EXISTING FROGMORE STORM RELIEF SEWER 1.5m INTERCEPTION CULVERT
r e t a W h g i H n a e M
6m x 4m TOP STRUCTURE
MLW
4.9m
VALVE CHAMBER
DISCLAIMER: INDICATIVE OPERATIONAL PHASE ARRANGEMENT. BASED ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT.
Chy
10 m PERMANENT HARDSTANDING 0 10 m
Depot
CA US EW AY
WB
Revision History Iss Description
SCALE 1 : 250
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AB AA
SECOND ISSUE FIRST ISSUE
JMAB JM
PSTV AS
JSWE GT
28/10/2011 23/10/2010
an d
Works
AY

Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2473
UBR
Sub Process:
JBRO
LONDON TIDEWAY TUNNELS

WANDSWORTH - CS07AR - FROGMORE SR-BELL LANE CK C07AR - DORMAY STREET
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
Works
PLOTTED ON 02/11/2011 BY LOCATION : e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_2\dms04398\100-DL-PNC-C07AR-146003.dgn
OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT C07AR

100-DL-PNC-C07AR-146003
r af t
1:250
A1
AB
5 0
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
TH E
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
DO
RM
T STREE
6
VENTILATION COLUMN (CSO)
Status:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Keyplan:
N
A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND 107m (AOD +100) REMOVABLE COVER ABOVE WEIR (LOCKABLE) DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
NOTE:
4m
3m
6m
1. STRUCTURE TO BE PROTECTED BY REMOVABLE HANDRAILS IN THE TEMPORARY CASE. 2. POSITION OF COVERS ARE VARIABLE WITHIN 10m FROM THE EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE LOCATION IS BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT 3. CLADDING OF VENTILLATION BUILDING TO SUIT LOCATION AND AESTHETICS. 4. ALL TOP STRUCTURES TO HAVE:ACCESS STAIRS/LADDER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT HAND RAILING 5. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
GROUND LEVEL
10000
5m
REMOVABLE COVERS ARE SPLIT UP INTO SECTIONS AND SUPPORTED BY BEAMS, WHICH ARE ALSO REMOVABLE
1m DIA
SCALE 1:50
DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF TOP STRUCTURE ABOVE CSO SHAFTS ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK (CSO)
- - - - - - 1500 150 0 50
Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
- - AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS
Dsgnr
GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
27-11-09 - 22-05-09
Date
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
60
2000
Location Code: OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
---
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
LTTDT
WASTE LONDON N/A
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:

Drawing Title:
SCALE 1:25
GENERIC ELEVATION AND TOP STRUCTURE FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT - CSO SITES
Drawing No.:
100-DH-GEN-00000-000001
PLOTTED ON 04\12\09 BY Andy.Purdy LOCATION : Thames Tideway Tunnel x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\planning-consents\Routewide\100-DH-GEN-00000-000001.dgn c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
NTS
A1
AB
100
200mm
VARIBLE DEPENDING ON
Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables

Transport Site considerations Access to road network Comments Site accesses onto Dormay Street at the northern end of Dormay Street near the existing access for the Keltbray site. The site access will require construction. The carriageway width at the location of the access is only approximately 5m in width. This may restrict turning movements for large vehicles at the access and will require further investigation. Dormay Street is subject to a 30mph speed limit, is street lit and features double yellow lines along its extent on both sides. The carriageway width varies between 4.2 and 8m metres. Visibility from the proposed access on Dormay Street may be restricted by the buildings to the south of the site. Access onto Armoury Way the A3 (TLRN strategic highway network) is approximately 100m to the south using Dormay Street. A priority working system would be required to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street. A preliminary Transport Access Plan is attached as Appendix 5. River access is not currently required as excavated material will be transported away by road. Mitigation required and conclusions Conclusion: Road access to site may be suitable for HGVs providing adequate turning space is provided to access/egress the site. In addition, a priority working system will be required on Dormay Street to control HGV vehicle movements. On-street parking along Dormay Street is prevented by double yellow lines along both sides. Site access will require construction.
Access to river
River access is not currently required as excavated material will be transported away by road.
Access to rail
Access to rail unlikely to be Route to possible rail link at required due to small volumes of Clapham Junction runs excavated material produced by through a high street area
Appendix 9 Page 1
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations the site. Access to railway sidings at Clapham Junction from the TLRN (A3 becoming the A217) onto the gyratory between the A217 and A3205 turning onto the A214. The route then leads onto East Hill, following onto St Johns Hill before turning onto Plough Road for the Clapham Junction Traincare Depot railway sidings. The route contains the same constraints as the route to the TLRN (A3/A217), in addition to passing under two rail bridges (on Swandon Way and Trinity Road) with no visible restrictions, and through a high street area along St Johns Hill. Distance 2.5km to rail access point from site. Parking Some parking could be provided within the site boundary for workforce. No parking is available within the vicinity of the site as Dormay Street has continuous double yellow lines along both sides. PTAL 3-4 (medium) as identified within Table 2.3. Comments Mitigation required and conclusions along St Johns Hill and under two rail bridges, with no visible restrictions in addition to the constraints encountered upon accessing the TLRN (A3/A217). Clapham Junction railway sidings at the Traincare Depot accessible using Plough Road.
Some parking for the workforce could be provided within site boundary with no parking available within the vicinity of the site.
Public transport accessibility
Reasonable possibility of the workforce being able to use public transport to access the site. Temporary traffic management required in the form of a priority working system to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street. Location of shaft results in the loss of some carriageway at the end of Dormay Street. This area may be used as a
Traffic management
Introduction of a priority working system required to allow construction vehicles to pass each other through the narrow road section (4.2m wide) on Dormay Street. Location of shaft results in the loss of some carriageway at the end of Dormay Street. This area may be used as a turning
Appendix 9 Page 2
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Comments head. Further investigation required to determine if this loss is acceptable to other users of Dormay Street. Access will need construction. Mitigation required and conclusions turning head. Further investigation required to determine if this loss is acceptable to other users of Dormay Street. Access will need construction.
Summary: This site is considered suitable as a CSO site, subject to further investigation of the potential use of the turning head at the end of Dormay Street, and the feasibility of HGVs accessing the site. A new access would need to be constructed. A temporary priority working system would need to be installed to allow construction vehicles to safely pass each other through the narrow section on Dormay Street. Potential road and rail access routes are considered to be suitable for HGVs, as there are no other visible restrictions. Due to the small amounts of excavated material that will be produced, it is unlikely that rail access would be utilised. River access is not required for this CSO site. There is a reasonable possibility that the workforce would be able to use public transport to access the site. Some parking could be provided onsite for the workforce, however there would be no parking available nearby due to the double yellow lines along both sides of Dormay Street, and because many of the surrounding roads are designated as red routes. Temporary traffic management would be required to facilitate the priority working system on Dormay Street.
Appendix 9 Page 3
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Designations, including archaeological priority areas Comments The site is located within the Wandsworth Archaeological Priority Area. Mitigation required and conclusions A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Summary of historical uses
A large industrial building is shown in the northeast corner of the southern part of the site (power supply) on the 19th century maps. This building appears to extend along the northern edge of the site overlooking Bell Lane Creek. A further separate structure is located where the shaft site is currently proposed. The two buildings remained until the 1960s, when they appear to have been demolished, to be replaced by a smaller single building approximately in the centre of the southern part of the site. Other than surfaces adjacent to the creek, the northern part of the site remains generally undeveloped. There are no known receptors recorded within the NMR or GLSMR within the site.
Potential receptors of very high or high value with the potential to be directly affected
A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the
Potential receptors of medium value with the potential to be directly affected
There are no known receptors recorded in the NMR or GLSMR within the site.
Other receptors with the potential to be directly affected
The creek is recorded as an historic watercourse (River Wandle) in the GLSMR as
Appendix 9 Page 4
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Comments MLO 72177. Deep ground works may impact surviving waterlogged structures relating to early wharfeage structures or revetments associated with the medieval use of the creek. Extent of existing disturbance (if known) Below-ground disturbance at the site is not expected to be significant as structures other than revetments are unlikely to have been built in this location due to the soft ground and risk of flooding. Mitigation required and conclusions archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Geotechnical monitoring
Potential issues
The potential may exist for A detailed desk-based waterlogged remains on edge assessment is required to of creek. sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Summary: Based on the current information available, this site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site. The site has mid to high potential for waterlogged archaeological remains associated with revetment and possibly waterside industries which may have taken place along the creek. Buildings erected during the post medieval period may have disturbed earlier remains but given the location, the site may equally have been raised to reduce risk of flooding, possibly protecting earlier material. A desk-based assessment is required to assess in detail the potential for archaeological remains at the site. An inspection of the pre-19th century map data should provide a better indication of the potential past use of the creek.
Appendix 9 Page 5
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Designations including conservation areas, including trees Comments Listed buildings Wentworth House, forecourt wall, gate and gatepiers, B L M Girdler Ltd , Dormay Street, Grade II: 0m Ram Brewery (Young's Brewery, adjoining No. 70), Wandsworth High Street, Grade II*: 210m Stables at Ram (Young's Brewery Complex), Ram Brewery, Wandsworth High Street, Grade II: 90m The Grapes public house, 39 Fairfield Street, Grade II: 210m 7, 8 and 9 Church Row, Wandsworth Plain, London, Grade II: 190m 1-6 Church Row, Wandsworth Plain, Grade II*: 220m Church of All Saints, Wandsworth High Street, Grade II*, 230m Wandsworth Town Hall (Including Town Hall), Wandsworth High Street, Grade II: 230m Locally listed buildings There are no locally listed buildings within 250m of C07AR. Conservation areas Wandsworth Town Conservation Area: 0m Registered historic parks and gardens There are no registered historic parks and gardens located within 250m of C07AR. Mitigation required and conclusions In the case of listed buildings and conservation areas, a high-quality scheme design and adequate screening for the development may be required, as discussed below. A detailed desk-based assessment, in conjunction with archaeology work, would be required to further determine the likely impact of the development and to inform more detailed mitigation proposals.
Appendix 9 Page 6
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments Locally listed parks and gardens There are no locally listed parks and gardens within 250m of C07AR. Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be directly affected There is potential for one conservation area (Wandsworth Town Conservation Area) and one listed building (Wentworth House) to be directly impacted on by the proposed development. The current indicative layout would potentially require the demolition of structures located within the conservation area along Dormay Street to allow for access to the site. Due to the historic nature of the structure to be removed, it is likely that its removal would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality and sensitive scheme design and/or screening would be required to ensure that the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the conservation area. Where possible, the alteration/ demolition of structures along Dormay Street within the conservation area should be avoided. However, the current indicative layout would require the demolition of structures located within the conservation area along Dormay Street, and conservation area consent will be required. The development proposals are not within the footprint of the listed structure itself, which is located to the south of the site, but are within the curtilage of the structure. The curtilage already contains numerous industrial units. The development proposals therefore would need to be carefully sited to avoid any direct impacts on associated structures such as boundary walls. A high-quality design would be necessary to ensure the structures setting is not further adversely affected. Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 7
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be directly affected Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Comments Not applicable. Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable.
There is potential for four Grade II listed buildings and three Grade II* listed buildings to be indirectly affected by the development proposals.
Two of the listed structures (Wentworth House and Stables at Ram) are within the potential visual envelope of the site and may have their settings and/or views to and from them impacted on as a result of the proposed development. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality scheme design and/or screening would be required to minimise any adverse impact. Not applicable.
Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Sensitive landscape character areas likely to be affected, including trees and TPOs
Not applicable.
Two industrial areas separated by the Bell Lane Creek. The area to the north is an industrial storage area with a perimeter of trees and shrubs, surrounded by security fencing. The area to the south is composed of a mix of small to medium industrial units. Brick industrial buildings are located along Dormay Street, with varied style of metal industrial sheds behind and fronting on to Bell Lane Creek and The Causeway. The southern part of the site is enclosed by brick walls with security fencing. The A3 runs to the south, beyond which is a mix of
Retention of trees and shrubs where possible and protection in accordance with BS 5837. Careful design and layout of the proposals with an appropriate landscape scheme could enhance the industrial character of the site. Boundary improvements along the Bell Lane Creek and careful design of the temporary Bailey bridge could enhance the character of the waterway. The site is appropriate with suitable mitigation that seeks to enhance the character of the site and the surrounding area.
Appendix 9 Page 8
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments industrial and residential areas. The River Wandle is located to the east, with a mix of industrial, commercial (hotel and garage) and residential areas located beyond. To the north are further industrial units and the railway. There is no significant vegetation on the southern site. Unmanaged trees and shrubs surround the northern part of the site. During construction, the demolition of existing industrial units, the presence and operation of machinery, storage of materials, temporary buildings and a temporary Bailey bridge to connect the two parts of the site would result in temporary direct impacts on both parts of the site and surrounding area, as a result of the increase in activity and a new crossing across the Creek. The industrial activity, however, would be in keeping with the industrial character of the area. In contrast, the temporary Bailey bridge would potentially impact on the waterway character of the creek. Permanent elements on the southern part of the site would have a negligible impact on the industrial character of the site. Potential views likely to be affected Open views of industrial units are available from neighbouring streets, adjacent industrial units and boat users travelling along the Bell Lane Creek and River Wandle. Construction activities would be visible from the surrounding area and streets. The During construction, the use of hoardings and appropriate lighting would reduce visual impact of construction activities from surrounding streets and areas. The design and layout of the site should be given careful consideration to enhance Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 9
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Mitigation required and conclusions temporary Bailey bridge would existing views. Permanent be visible for users of Bell Lane structures should, if possible, Creek and cars and pedestrians be screened through planting. crossing the Causeway bridge. The design of the top structure Tall structures and machinery and ventilation column to be would also be visible above the given careful consideration. foreground of industrial buildings In terms of townscape, the site for motorists along the A3 and is suitable with appropriate high-rise residential properties mitigation. to the south and west. Permanent industrial structures would be visible from surrounding areas and the 10mhigh vent column above the foreground of industrial buildings. During construction, views of cranes to and from the adjacent conservation area, Wentworth House and Stables at Ram, may be impacted on. During operation, views of top structure and ventilation column to and from the adjacent conservation area, Wentworth House and Stables at Ram, may be a consideration. Comments Permanent structures at C07AR would potentially have a direct impact on Wandsworth Town Conservation Area and the Grade II listed Wentworth House, and indirect impact on one Grade II* listed building. Any permanent structures would need to be of a high-quality design and/or screened to preserve or enhance the appearance of the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area, and to ensure there are no setting issues with the identified listed structures. It is also important to ensure that there are no physical impacts on any historic elements within the curtilage of the Grade II listed Wentworth House.
Particular considerations on sites where new permanent structures are required
Appendix 9 Page 10
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Potential issues Comments The development will potentially impact on the setting of two listed buildings and possibly impact on associated structures within the curtilage of the Grade II listed Wentworth House. In addition to this the development may adversely affect the character of the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. Through careful design, the construction and operation of the development would potentially enhance the local townscape character and local views. Mitigation required and conclusions The scheme design would need to be of a sufficiently high quality and may need to incorporate some screening in order that potential direct and indirect impacts of the development on built heritage receptors are reduced. Particular attention will need to be paid to the relationship of C07AR to the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area and Grade II listed Wentworth House to ensure that the visual amenity and fabric of the receptors are not adversely affected. The scheme design would need to be of a high quality and incorporate screening and landscape treatment to enhance the local townscape character and local views.
Summary: In terms of built heritage, the site is considered to be less suitable as a CSO site. The proposals are within the curtilage of the Grade II listed Wentworth House and partially within the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. The indicative site layout would potentially require the demolition of structures within the conservation area. Due to the potentially historic nature of the structure/s to be removed, there is the potential for adverse impacts to the character and appearance of the conservation area. However, it is anticipated that the impacts would be minimal due to the existing industrial character of the area, which is already detracting from the conservation area. Mitigation, in the form of a sensitive scheme layout to avoid the demolition of structures of potential historic value, could minimise the level of impact on the conservation area. A high-quality scheme design and/or screening would need to be considered in relation to the conservation area and also to ensure that the settings of the Grade II Wentworth House and Grade II Stables at Ram structure are not adversely affected. In terms of townscape, the site is considered suitable as a CSO site because the proposals would have minimal impacts on views from surrounding areas including residential properties, and on the character of the industrial area. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality scheme design, screening and landscape treatment of the site, could enhance the local townscape character and views.
Appendix 9 Page 11
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Hydrogeological conditions (groundwater) From BGS Geological Model, giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. Comments Geology (thickness) Superficial geology and made ground (4m) London Clay (46m) Lambeth Group (21m) Thanet Sand (11 m) Hydrogeology Piezometric level in Chalk aquifer: ~ -23mAOD (~27mbgl) from EA Jan 08 water level contouring Groundwater monitoring location EA hydrometry sites: TQ27-159 approximately 275m south of the site (water levels to March 2009) SPZs and SPZ groundwater users Not located in a source protection zone EA licensed groundwater abstractions and details No public water supply Four licensed abstraction borehole within 2km radius Licence Numbers: 1. 28/39/39/0177 (2 boreholes) 2. 28/39/42/0071 (1 borehole) 3. 28/39/41/0081 (1 borehole) Locations: 1. 1.2km northwest of the site (other side of the River Thames) 2. 600m northeast of the site 3. 600m south of the site A simple volumetric approach has been used to calculate the total catchment zone of the abstraction borehole. A conservative mean annual recharge of 100mm/year was used to calculate a radius for licensed abstraction boreholes as follows: 1. 109m 2. 137m 3. 80m As a result, the shaft is not located within any of these catchment areas. Mitigation required and conclusions The drop shaft will be constructed to an invert level of approximately 32.11mbgl, therefore the shaft will be founded in the London Clay. Piezometric head in Chalk is approximately 5.1m above the base of the construction.
Appendix 9 Page 12
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Comments Operator: 1. Trustees of the Hurlingham Club 2. Hanson Quarry Prod Europe Ltd 3. London Borough of Wandsworth Abstracted Aquifer Unit: 1. Gravel 2. Chalk 3. Chalk Abstraction purposes: 1. Industrial, commercial and public service (sports grounds/facilities spray irrigation) 2. Industrial, commercial and public service (mineral products general use) 3. Industrial, commercial and public service (municipal grounds make up or top up water) Abstraction quantity (annual): 1. 15,000m3 2. 23,515m3 3. 8,000m3 Local authorities (LA) unlicensed groundwater abstractions and details No abstraction borehole within 1km radius. Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 13
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Borehole locations There are six historical records and depths of water wells: five deep wells and one shallow well within 1km radius. Depth range: 101.8 192.02m. Depth range: 6.88m. Potential impacts on surface water features The site is located approximately 400 metres south of the River Thames. The site is located immediately adjacent to the Bell Lane Creek, a distributary of the River Wandle and a tributary of the Thames. The site is located behind the flood defences and so the pathway for pollution would be through drainage to Bell Lane Creek. Work needs to be undertaken in consideration of Pollution Prevention Guidelines PPG1, PPG5 and PPS23. Specifically, in relation to the proximity to Bell Lane Creek, construction site boundaries will need to be tightly controlled with bunding and runoff to drainage controlled.
Potential impacts on groundwater (resources and quality)
No impact on groundwater at See below (likely types of depth is likely since the drop mitigation measures that will shaft is to be constructed in be required). London Clay (non-productive strata, previously called non-aquifer). At shallow depth, the shaft is located in alluvium, which is classified as secondary aquifer (previously called minor aquifer). Limited impact on shallow aquifer if water is excluded from the excavation by sheet piling. No mitigation is required if groundwater is not impacted. Not applicable
Likely types of mitigation measures that would be required Potential issues
The drop shaft is to be excavated in London Clay but to below piezometric head in Chalk. Potential pressure effects. Limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer.
Confined head in Chalk to be considered as part of geotechnical design. Impact on and mitigation for shallow aquifer will depend on construction design.
Appendix 9 Page 14
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: In terms of hydrogeology, this site is suitable as a CSO site because the drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (non-productive strata, previously called a non-aquifer). The Chalk piezometric head is likely to be approximately 5.1m above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected. The superficial deposits are alluvium, which is classified as a secondary aquifer at the shaft site. There would be a limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to sheet piling. In terms of surface water resources, this site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site, as there is no direct route for pollution to Bell Lane Creek. However, standard mitigation would be required in line with Pollution Prevention Guidelines 1 and 5 and Planning Policy Statement 23, with strict controls applied to the construction site boundaries and drainage.
Appendix 9 Page 15
Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Statutory designations Comments None within 2km. Mitigation required and conclusions None required. Care will need to be taken to avoid impacts (including contaminated runoff) into Bell Lane Creek. Works are unlikely to require land-take from the BAP habitat. However, care will need to be taken to avoid impacts (including contaminated runoff) into Bell Lane Creek, particularly during the Bailey bridge installation and spoil storage. If bat roosts were found to be present, mitigation would be required, possibly including offsite provision. If mature scrub or trees are to be removed between March and September (the period when birds are likely to be nesting), an ecologist will need to confirm the absence of nesting birds prior to clearance. The significance of the disturbance to spawning smelt can be assessed following completion of baseline surveys. No further issues identified at this stage.
Non-statutory designated Site is immediately wildlife sites adjacent to River Thames and Tidal Tributaries SMI. BAP priority habitats The Bell Lane Creek shore includes the UK and London BAP priority habitat mudflats. The Thames Tideway is a London BAP habitat.
Protected or otherwise notable species within the study area
There is a low possibility that buildings on site may be used by roosting bats. Trees and scrub on site have the potential to be used by common nesting birds. Ground-penetrating works and the installation and use of the temporary Bailey bridge will potentially lead to increased disturbance to spawning smelt which utilise the creek.
Potential issues
No further issues identified at this stage.
Summary: This site is considered suitable as a CSO site, as it is only likely to require basic ecological surveys if selected. However, great care would need to be taken to avoid contamination of the creek during Bailey bridge instillation, use and spoil storage.
Appendix 9 Page 16
Flood risk assessment Site considerations Flood risk zone Comments The site is within Flood Zone 3. It is defended to the one in 1,000-year flood level from the Thames Tideway, and has one in 1,000-year defences protecting it from flooding from the Bell Lane Creek. However, the defences along the Wandle are not at a consistent standard of protection and the site may be liable to flooding from the Wandle, and is not shown to be defended from Wandle flooding. There would also be potential for a breach of the defences and, as such, mitigation would need to be considered as part of the FRA. Sewage transmission infrastructure is considered to be water compatible, according to Table D.2 of PPS25. The site is brownfield and at the downstream point in the catchment. Hence, although the superficial geology is such that an investigation into the suitability of infiltration SUDS is required, it is likely that straightforward surface attenuation SUDS would be sufficient to manage surface water runoff. No further issues identified at this stage. Mitigation required and conclusions An FRA would be required to assess the risk of flooding to the site.
Assessment of conditions for SUDS
Not applicable.
Potential issues
No further issues identified at this stage.
Summary: This site is less suitable as it is not fully protected from flooding from the River Wandle. There is limited space on site for SUDS, and an investigation would be required to determine the suitability of infiltration SUDS. However, surface attenuation SUDS are likely to be sufficient to manage surface water runoff at this site.
Appendix 9 Page 17
Air quality Site considerations AQMA Comments The air quality objective for NO 2 is exceeded on major roads in the vicinity of site. The whole of Wandsworth borough is an air quality management area for NO 2 and PM 10 . There are residential properties along Armoury Way (A3). The nearest residential properties are within 50m of the site on Armoury Way. The main traffic issue in this area is exhaust emissions from vehicles along the A3, A3209 and A217 corridors. See above. Mitigation required and conclusions There is a need for more site specific data.
Sensitive receptors
There are relevant air quality sensitive receptors present along the route that construction traffic is likely to take, and close to the proposed construction works. Additional vehicle emissions have a low potential to interfere with local air quality action plan policies. See above.
Existing traffic issues
Existing sources of significant air pollutants Notable gaps in existing air quality monitoring
There is no data at likely access to A3 and the nearest existing data indicates existing exceedance of air quality limit values. The risk from additional exhaust emissions from construction HGVs is undefined at present. The risk from dust impacts at residential properties is moderate.
Collect a minimum of six months diffusion tube data at site access to A3 or other point of access to major road network. Minimise HGV movements on the local road network during the peak hour. Standard dust control measures will minimise the effect of fugitive dust on nearby sensitive receptors.
Potential issues
Summary: This site is less suitable for use as a CSO site from an air quality perspective. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site, therefore there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at these properties. These impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality. This could be somewhat mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
Appendix 9 Page 18
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Noise Site considerations Noise band level (from Defra noise maps) Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Information from Defra noise maps Not applicable indicates daytime noise levels of between 69 and 74 dB L Aeq and night-time levels of between 60 and 65 L Aeq at residential properties located on Armoury Way/Frogmore. These residential properties are likely to experience relatively high day and night-time noise levels due to their proximity to Armoury Way (A3) to the south of the site. Noise levels from the Defra noise maps provide an indication of prevailing noise levels only, and will not be employed in any detailed assessments for selected sites. There are sensitive receptors located to the south-southwest of the site, on Armoury Way and Frogmore. Sensitive receptors to the south are residential properties consisting of two to three storeys. These are located approximately 50m from the southern site boundary. There are a number of sensitive receptors adjacent to the site access route, including the Crane Public House on the corner of Dormay Street and Armoury Way (A3) which could be affected by HGV traffic. Not applicable
Sensitive receptors
Existing traffic issues
Local road traffic on Armoury Way (A3), Not applicable coupled with more distant road traffic on other major routes nearby, will contribute to the local noise climate of the area. Local road traffic on Armoury Way (A3), Not applicable coupled with more distant road traffic on other major routes nearby, will contribute to the local noise climate of the area. A railway also lies to the north of the site. Construction: The construction period is estimated at up to two years and working hours will be 12 hours per day (7am to 7pm) Monday to Saturday. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts to the closest sensitive receptors located on Armoury Adherence to the good site practices given in BS5228. Siting of noisy equipment and construction activities as far as is
Existing sources of significant noise emissions Potential issues
Appendix 9 Page 19
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Noise Site considerations Comments Way (A3). The vehicle movements have the potential to result in adverse noise impacts along the length of Dormay Street and also along the A3. The immediate site area is fairly small and, while the shaft location may be fixed, ancillary plant should be sited as far as is practicable from surrounding sensitive receptors. Situating plant in the northern area of the site would maximise the distance between them and the nearest sensitive receptors, and minimise potential disturbance. Proposed 3m site boundary fencing will provide useful noise mitigation to some plant and construction activities. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated to result in an adverse impact. The nearest receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of approximately 70m and it is unlikely that vibration levels will result in minor cosmetic damage during shaft sinking, however vibration levels may give rise to annoyance. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a caseby-case basis at particular sensitive locations. Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the ventilation column and top chamber should result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Summary: This site is suitable due to the distance between the site and residential properties located on Armoury Way. The number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route is likely to have an adverse noise impact due to the close proximity of residential receptors (the Crane Public House) to the proposed haul routes. Mitigation required and conclusions practicable from sensitive receptors. Provision of site boundary noise fences.
Appendix 9 Page 20
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Land quality Site location Current site use Topography Field evidence of contamination (ie, visual/ olfactory) Grid reference: 525531, 174960 Contractors yard owned/operated by Keltbray Ltd Generally flat None identified at this stage.
Current surrounding land North: Bell Lane Creek and the Causeway Island use (immediately adjacent (split into two parts); land to the north used for open to site) storage of motor vehicles and materials; land to the northeast is open space laid out as an ecological area. Railway track. East: The Causeway, the River Wandle, and gas works and industrial units beyond. South: Commercial/industrial units (including Wentworth House used by owner Keltbray), The Causeway and the A3 beyond. West: Industrial and commercial premises, including the London Borough of Wandsworth maintenance depot (mainly vehicular storage and maintenance) and offices. Geological and hydrogeological information Geological strata1 Superficial geology and made ground (4m) London Clay (46m) Lambeth Group (21m) Thanet Sand (11m)
Underlying aquifer classes
Unproductive strata: London Clay Secondary aquifer: River terrace deposits, Lambeth Group, Thanet Sand Principal aquifer: Chalk River terrace deposits secondary aquifer High leaching potential of soils (U)1
Groundwater vulnerability/Soil classification (High/Intermediate/Low/ Not applicable)2 Source protection zone details Surface water receptor
Not located in a source protection zone Bell Lane Creek (adjacent north) River Wandle (27m east) River Thames (293m north)
Appendix 9 Page 21
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Land quality Relevant information within a 250m radius of the site Site history information and historical potentially contaminating activities (based on mapping data) On site North of Bell Lane Creek Historical maps show this part of the site to be undeveloped, 1868-1996 Aerial photographs show mature trees along the southern boundary. The rest of the site appears to be covered with hardstanding and used as a storage depot/yard, 2003-2006 On site South of Bell Lane Creek Unknown buildings (likely to be a works), 18681899 Royal Wandsworth Laundry (northern region of site), 1896-1920 Laundry works is labelled a ruin, 1947 Site is labelled as a works (use unspecified), 1948present Off site Historical building plans list a gas engine (1m west), 1907 Road haulage (3m east), 1987 Historical building plans list a gas engine (6m east), 1907 Corporation yard (8m east), 1947-1970 Works (10m southwest), present Infilled land water (16m east), 1896 Historical building plans list electricity generation (16m east), 1907 Works (19m southwest), 1972-1996 Electrical substation (22m north), 1969 Works (23m east), 1972-1977 Works (29m south), present Tar works with 18 tank areas (26m east, located on opposite side of River Wandle), 1947-1970 Garage (33m southeast), 1976-1996 Numerous tanks located in an easterly direction associated with former Wandsworth Tar Works (closest located 35m east, located on opposite side of River Wandle), 1951-1968 Railways (35m north), 1868-present Wharf (39m west), 1947-1970 Dye works with tanks and works buildings (40m
Appendix 9 Page 22
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Land quality southwest), 1868-1952 Infilled land water (48m east), 1949 Warehouse (51m west), 1947-1970 Factory or woks use not specified (52m southwest), 1989 Wharf (transport support and cargo handling), (54m north), 1916-1976 Electricity works (66m north), 1947-1970 Depot (66m west), 1976-1996 Warehouse (68m west), present Goods shed (85m northwest), 1947-1970 Laundry (95m south), 1909-1970 Infilled land water, (97m southeast), 1949 Mill (cattle food), (98m northwest), 1947-1970 Wharf (99m west), 1909-1920 Wharf (105m west), 1909-1920 Timber yard (106m south), 1947-1970 Motor vehicles maintenance and repair (128m east), 1989 Gas manufacture and distribution (130m northeast), 1873-1949 Brewery (150m south), 1909-1920 Waterworks (160m north), 1909-1920 Works (wood block flooring), (166m northwest), 1947-1970 Works (211m northwest), 1972-1996 Laundry (215m west), 1909-1920 Engineering works (223m northwest), 1947-1970 Engineering works (250m northwest), 1947-1970
Pollution incidents to controlled waters Landfill sites Other waste sites
One Unknown sewage, significant incident, (92m southeast) Historical landfill site, ref EAHLD11043, 125m north, no data Three registered waste transfer sites: Special waste transfer station (inert/asbestos), very small (less than 10,000 t/year) since 6/2/1995 (43m northwest). Listed as operational. Metal, film and photo waste treatment, very small (less than 10,000 t/year), active (90m south).
Appendix 9 Page 23
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Land quality Household, commercial and industrial inert waste transfer station, medium (25,000 to 75,000 t/year), inactive (136m northwest). Registered radioactive substances Fuel stations/depots Contemporary trade entries None One former petrol station, Armoury Way, Wandsworth, (129m southeast). Eight: Commercial cleaning service, inactive (on site south of Bell Lane Creek) Waste disposal service, inactive (on site south of Bell Lane Creek) Telecommunication equipment and system, active, (53m south) Car dealer used, inactive (79m south) Gas suppliers, inactive (83m northeast) Refrigeration equipment retail, active (116m northeast) Scrap metal merchant, inactive (117m southeast) Commercial vehicles servicing, repairs, parts and accessories, inactive (132m east) Distance and direction to site 1) On site and directly adjacent to site 2) On site 3) On site 4) On site 4) Metals, PAHs, TPH 3) Metals, sulphate, TPH, solvents
Site classification based on above information Activity Potential site contaminants derived from surface sources (eg, contaminants in made ground) 1) Some potential for made ground from potential filling operations during development 2) Works 3) Laundry/ commercial cleaning service 4) Waste disposal service Contaminants 1) Metals, PAHs, TPH 2) Metals, PAHs, TPH
Appendix 9 Page 24
Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Appendix 9 Land quality Potential site contaminants derived from off-site sources and transported to site 1) Road haulage 2) Corporation yard 3) Works 4) Infilled land 5) Electricity generation 1) 3m east 2) 8m east 3) 10m southwest 4) 16m east 5) 16m east 2) Metals, PAHs, TPH 3) Metals, PAHs, TPH 4) Metals, PAHs, TPH 5) PCBs Identified sourcepathway-receptor risk assessment at CSO construction stage (Conceptual Site Model)2 Source 1: A1, B4 Source 2: D6, E1, F7 (Note that during the borehole drilling, the potential exists for the Chalk geological strata to be encountered at the base of the borehole. Consequently, potential exists for contaminants to be transported vertically to the principal Chalk aquifer.) Category 3 assessed as high risk 1) Metals, PAHs, TPH
Contamination category
Summary: In terms of land quality, the site is considered to be less suitable because of the high potential that contamination has occurred from historic activities on site. These include a laundry works, a general works, commercial cleaning services and a waste disposal service which have the potential to impact on soils and shallow groundwater. Additionally, migration from offsite activities may have occurred through the shallow groundwater to beneath the site. The contamination would have the potential to impact on site workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact/vapour inhalation exposure pathways. Additionally, the potential exists for contamination of surface water receptors to occur through the migration of contaminants through the shallow (ie, river terrace gravel) aquifer. Notes: 1. Soil information for urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere in the country. Therefore, a worst case vulnerability (H) is assumed until proven otherwise.
2.
Refer to schematic Conceptual Site Model for explanation of site-specific sourcepathway-receptors.
3.
From BGS Geological Model giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river.
Appendix 9 Page 25
Contacts
For information about the Thames Tideway Tunnel Call: 0800 0721 086 Lines are open 24 hours a day Visit: www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk Email: info@tidewaytunnels.co.uk For our language interpretation service call 0800 0721 086
For information in Braille or large print call 0800 0721 086

For information about acceptance of our application and the examination process please contact the Planning Inspectorate. Call: 0303 444 5000 Visit: http://infrastructure.planningportal.gov.uk

Site Suitability Report C07AR/CL008: Dormay Street

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Site Suitability Report C07AR/CL008: Dormay Street

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Autumn 2011

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

110-RG-PNC-C07AR-000588 | Autumn 2011

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Thames Tunnel Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

Site information ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 2.2

Engineering assessment ................................................................................. 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4

Planning assessment ...................................................................................... 7 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Socio-economic and community assessment............................................. 13

Property assessment ..................................................................................... 14

Site conclusions by discipline ...................................................................... 15

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

TLRN TPA UDP UXO

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

Introduction Purpose and structure of the report

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Site information Site and surroundings

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.10

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

Proposed use of site construction phase

Proposed use of site operational phase Introduction

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Restoration and after-use

Engineering assessment Access

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Construction works considerations

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Permanent works considerations

Health and safety

Planning assessment Introduction

Planning applications and permissions

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

6.3.7 6.3.8 6.3.9 6.3.10

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Environmental appraisal Introduction

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Built heritage and townscape

Water resources hydrogeology and surface water

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

Socio-economic and community assessment Introduction

Issues and impacts

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008

Property assessment Introduction

Crown land and special land comments

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street

Property valuation comments

Disturbance compensation comments

Offsite statutory compensation comments

Site acquisition cost assessment

Site conclusions by discipline Introduction

Site suitability report C07AR/CL008 Dormay Street