100 RG PNC C07BD 900001

Spring 2010
Site Suitability Report C07BD

Car park off Broomhill Road to rear of flats facing onto Buckhold Road
Please note: Further details are provided in the Final Report on Site Selection Process (doc ref: 7.05) that can be found on the Thames Tideway Tunnel section of the Planning Inspectorates web site.
100-RG-PNC-C07BD-900001 | Spring 2010

Car park off Broomhill Road to rear of flats facing onto Buckhold Road
THAMES TUNNEL
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT C07BD

LIST OF CONTENTS
Page Number 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.2 1.3 2 Purpose and structure of the report Background Consultation 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9
SITE INFORMATION 2.1 2.2 Site and surroundings Type of site
3 4
PROPOSED USE OF SITE CONSTRUCTION PHASE PROPOSED USE OF SITE OPERATIONAL PHASE 4.1 4.2 Introduction Restoration and after-use
ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Access Construction works considerations Permanent works considerations Health and safety
PLANNING ASSESSMENT 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Introduction Planning applications and permissions Planning context Consultation comments Planning comments
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 Introduction Transport Archaeology Built heritage and townscape Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Ecology Flood risk Air quality Noise Land quality
SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT 8.1 8.2 Socio-economic profile Issues and impacts
PROPERTY ASSESSMENT 9.1 9.2 Introduction Crown Land and Special Land comments
100-RG-PNC-C07BD-900001.doc
9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 10
Land to be acquired Property valuation comments Disturbance compensation comments Offsite statutory compensation comments Site acquisition cost assessment
9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 12
SITE CONCLUSIONS BY DISCIPLINE 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 Introduction Engineering Planning Environment Socio-economic and community Property
APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN APPENDIX 3 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLANS APPENDIX 4 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDINGS APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN APPENDIX 6 SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN APPENDIX 7 CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT APPENDIX 8 OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT APPENDIX 9 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL TABLE
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AOD BAP BT CPO CSO DLR EA GLA HGV LNR LPA LU m MOL ONS ORN PLA POS PTAL SAM SINC SNCI SSR SSSI SuDS TfL TD TLRN TPA UDP UXO
above Ordnance Datum Biodiversity Action Plan British Telecom compulsory purchase order combined sewer overflow Docklands Light Railway Environment Agency Greater London Authority heavy goods vehicle local nature reserve local planning authority London Underground metre/metres Metropolitan Open Land Office of National Statistics Olympic Route Network Port of London Authority public open space public transport accessibility level scheduled ancient monument site of importance for nature conservation site(s) of nature conservation importance site suitability report site(s) of special scientific interest sustainable urban drainage systems Transport for London tunnel datum Transport for London Road Network Thames Policy Area unitary development plan unexploded ordnance
1 1.1 1.1.1
INTRODUCTION Purpose and structure of the report The Site Selection Methodology (May 2009) paper (paragraphs 2.3.29 - 2.3.34) outlines the process to be used to create the preferred list of shaft sites, and this process also applies to CSO sites. Paragraph 2.3.31 lists the type of general considerations that will be addressed in each site suitability report, but they depend on the relevance to the site and professional judgement made in the assessments. This report was prepared through the assessment of information from the perspective of a number of technical disciplines: Engineering, Planning, Environment, Property and Community. The reports have been prepared on the basis of the information listed in Appendix 1 - Sources of Information, and this level of information is considered to be appropriate to the current stage. The Background Technical Paper provides information on the requirements for different site types, their sizes and typical activities/facilities within the sites. Each site suitability report considers a particular site on its own merits. In addition, an engineering options report was produced. Information from both of these reports will feed into the technical assessment of how well the site may fit in with tunnel design options, ensuring combinations of sites spread across the length of the tunnel route provide a reasonable spatial distribution of sites (that will best assist with the construction of the tunnel, operation and maintenance). This is considered in the Preferred Scheme Report. Background The process for selecting sites is set out in the Site Selection Methodology (May 2009) paper. All sites have previously passed through the following parts of Stage 1: Part 1A - Creation of the long list of potential shaft (and CSO) sites Part 1B - Creation of a short list of potential shaft (and CSO) sites o o o Table 2.2: Long list of shaft (and CSO) sites - an assessment against set considerations and values Table 2.3: Draft short list of shaft (and CSO) sites - assessment against a list of detailed considerations Workshops to consider each site to arrive at a short list of sites.
1.1.2
1.1.3 1.1.4
1.2 1.2.1
1.2.2
The final part of Stage 1 includes this report. The following is an overall summary of all elements that apply to all the sites on the final short list: Part 1C - Creation of the Preferred List of shaft (and CSO) sites - site data, site visits, site suitability reports, engineering options report and optioneering workshops that will result in the Preferred Scheme Report.
1.3 1.3.1
Consultation The Thames Water project team held meetings with London local authorities, statutory and other stakeholders to review the provisional short list of shaft and CSO sites. All general and site specific comments can be found in a separate report titled Consultation on the Short List of Sites: Consultation Feedback Report. These comments were considered to help determine the final short list of sites, but they were also considered at the optioneering workshops. Further meetings were held with London local authorities, statutory and other stakeholders between January and March 2010. Comments are included in this report.
1.3.2
Page 1
2 2.1 2.1.1
SITE INFORMATION Site and surroundings This site is one of the shortlisted sites for Frogmore Storm Relief Buckhold Road CSO. This section provides an overview of all the site information that will be used by one or more disciplines to assess the site in sections 3 to 9 of this report. The proposed site would occupy the car park of 1 60 Park View Court, within the London Borough of Wandsworth. Park View Court consists of residential flats situated at the junction of Broomhill Road and Buckhold Road. Access to the car park is taken from Broomhill Road opposite the semi-detached dwellings at 9 24 Broomhill Road. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 2. The area is generally mixed, with Wandsworth Town Centre located 150m to the north, and the Business Village immediately adjoining the northern boundary of the site. West Hill Primary School is located to the northwest. The area to the west and south of the site is residential and King Georges Park is located to the southeast. The area east of the site consists of a mix of residential and retail, including the Southside Shopping Centre. The boundary of the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area is located close to the proposed site. The site falls within an archaeological priority area, while Green Chains and links pass through the local centre, following the route of the River Wandle. All the mapped designations are shown on the planning and environment plans in Appendix 3. Photographs of the site and surroundings, together with an aerial photograph of the site, are attached as Appendix 4. There is road access to the site via Broomhill Road, which is a short distance from the A3. The site is 2.3km from rail access, using the route A3 and A3036. East Putney London Underground station and Wandsworth Town rail station are less than 1.5km from the site. There are no existing jetty/wharfage facilities at the site and it is remote from any potential river route. A transport plan for the site is attached as Appendix 5. Third-party assets and significant utilities are listed below and are shown on the services and geology plan in Appendix 6: Residential buildings to the southwest and east.
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5 2.1.6
2.1.7
2.1.8
The locations of other third-party assets, such as BT and fibre-optic communication cables, are to be confirmed by further studies and utility searches and may not be shown on the services and geology plan. Information on the geology specific to this site can be found within the services and geology plan, which is in Appendix 6. This plan shows that the shaft would be founded in London Clay.
2.1.9
2.1.10 It is understood that National Grid is planning to build a cable tunnel which would run through the outside eastern part of the site. If this site is selected, there would be dialogue with National Grid to consider matters if applicable (such as timing, engineering constraints, cumulative effects of the projects, potential for site sharing, etc.) 2.2 2.2.1 Type of site The site C07BD is being considered as a CSO site to intercept the Frogmore Storm Relief Buckhold Road CSO (CS07B). PROPOSED USE OF SITE CONSTRUCTION PHASE The proposed construction phase layouts for the CSO site are located in Appendix 7 Construction Phase Layout, and are based on a preliminary assessment.
3 3.1.1
Page 2
3.1.2
The construction phase layout drawings are illustrative and show: the layout as a CSO site potential access point.
3.1.3
These drawings provide initial preliminary schematic layouts that have not been optimised. If the site proceeds to the next stage as a preferred site, construction phase layouts would be optimised to minimise impacts. Photographs of typical activities associated with the CSO site construction phase are provided in Appendix 7. Potential above ground construction features include: approximately 3m high hoarding around the site boundary welfare facilities, temporary structures, approximately 3m high grout plant, approximately 3m to 5m high, including silos mobile crane, approximately 30m high (maximum and not for full construction duration).
3.1.4
3.1.5 3.1.6
A preliminary assessment of the traffic management which would be required is indicated on the temporary traffic management plan in Appendix 5. Preliminary data associated with the construction phase are provided in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Construction phase data Activity Length of construction period Likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) Working days Primary means of transporting excavated material away from site Primary means of transporting materials to site CSO site 0.5 to 2 years 12 hrs from 7am to 7pm Mon to Sat Road Road
4 4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2
PROPOSED USE OF SITE OPERATIONAL PHASE Introduction The indicative operational phase layout for the CSO site is located in Appendix 8 Operational Phase Layout, and is based on a preliminary assessment. The generic elevations of structures shown on the operational phase layout are located in Appendix 8 and provide an illustration of typical examples of the permanent structures which are applicable to CSO sites. The above ground infrastructure at this site is likely to comprise a ventilation column 10m high and 3m diameter, a ventilation building 5m x 15m x 5m high and a 20m x 10m top structure with openings. The top structure is to provide access and egress into the main shaft and flap valve chamber.
b a
4.1.3
4.1.4
The top structures are envisaged to be finished at a level of 107m tunnel datum (TD) (7mAOD), and since the ground level mean value at this site is 104mTD (4mAOD), the top
It was anticipated that the ventilation column at shaft sites would be 10m high when the assessment in this report was undertaken. Although this was subsequently changed to 15m high, the assessment was not revised as it was considered that the difference would not change any disciplines conclusion on the suitability of the site. b It was anticipated that the elevation of top structures at both CSO and shaft sites would be finished at 107mTD when the assessment in this report was undertaken. Although this was subsequently changed to
Page 3
structures would be raised to approximately 3m above the current ground level. For further information on the generic layout of this top structure, refer to Appendix 8. 4.1.5 4.1.6 A hardstanding would be provided to the top structures. The site would not be fenced. Preliminary data associated with the operational phase are provided in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Operational phase data Level of inspections and maintenance and likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) frequency of visits 1 daytime visit every six months for electrical/instrument inspection. An additional 1 week maintenance period for tunnel/shaft inspection required per 10 years that could be night/day/weekend working. 1 van visit every six months. An additional 1 week period of 2 to 10 movements per day (estimated several vans and 2 cranes) every 10 years. 4.2 4.2.1 Restoration and after-use The portion of the site not occupied by the permanent works would be restored to its original condition on completion of the construction works. If any buildings were demolished, these would not be reinstated unless required. ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT Access This section should be read in conjunction with Section 7.2. Road 5.1.2 5.1.3 The site is immediately adjacent to Broomhill Road, which is directly off the A218 (Buckhold Road). Access from Broomhill Road would apply to both the construction and operational phases. Rail 5.1.4 There is no rail network local to this site. Rail access is not considered to be a significant factor for CSO sites. River 5.1.5 River access is not a requirement for CSO sites. In addition, the site is remote from any feasible water route. Construction works considerations The site is within the car park of properties fronting Buckhold Road. The CSO drop shaft would be located approximately 20m away from the nearest residential building. The construction working area would use up most of the car park area, but the site could be arranged to provide limited car parking spaces for residents in the adjacent buildings.
No of traffic movements
5 5.1 5.1.1
5.2 5.2.1 5.2.2
104.5mTD, the assessment was not revised as it was considered that the difference would not change any disciplines conclusion on the suitability of the site.
Page 4
5.2.3
The drop shaft would be approximately 45m from Frogmore Storm Relief Sewer as a direct connection. The length and depth of this shortest route connection to the interception chamber may preclude tunnelling/pipejacking under the multi-storey residential building. Therefore, the proposed interception chamber has been located at the junction of Broomhill Road and Buckhold Road so that the CSO connection culvert could run into and under Broomhill Road for approximately 85m, using an open cut or tunnelling method. No demolition would be required on this site. Data available on third-party assets and significant utilities show that the items of concern at this site are the residential buildings along the east of the site. Construction methods would be adopted, as appropriate, to mitigate potential settlement of this asset. It is likely that the proposed works can be constructed within the overall construction programme. Permanent works considerations The top structures to the drop shaft and flap valve chamber would be finished at ground level. Health and safety There are no unusual health and safety issues with this site. PLANNING ASSESSMENT Introduction The planning assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Planning applications and permissions Planning context Planning comments.
5.2.4 5.2.5
5.2.6
5.3 5.3.1
5.4 5.4.1 6 6.1 6.1.1
6.2 6.2.1
Planning applications and permissions An initial desktop search of the London Borough of Wandsworth online planning applications database did not identify any planning applications submitted within the last five years applicable to the site. Planning context The following is a summary of the relevant local planning policies and designations affecting the site and are taken from the current statutory development plan for the borough. The local plan comprises the saved policies from the Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan, adopted August 2003, and the Consolidated London Plan, adopted February 2008. Policy TBE14, Archaeological Priority Area, states that where development involves ground disturbance, the council will require developers to undertake an archaeological investigation. As appropriate, the council may, under Policy TBE15, require the preservation of findings either in situ or by excavation. The site lies adjacent to residential properties. Policy GEN12, Housing in determining proposals for development, the council will seek to protect and enhance the character and amenity of residential areas. The proposal site is located adjacent to the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area.
6.3 6.3.1
6.3.2
6.3.3
6.3.4
Page 5
6.3.5 6.3.6
Policy TBE10, Conservation Area, prohibits development which would harm the character, appearance and setting of a conservation area. Policy ON7, Green Chain Links, prohibits development that would harm the open nature of any open land that might contribute towards Green Chain or links between open spaces and especially between Metropolitan Open Land, and where they form strategic links between boroughs. Consultation comments A series of consultations on the shortlisted sites were held with London local authorities, statutory and other pan-London stakeholders during July to September 2009 and January to March 2010. This section summarises factual comments that have been made by consultees, and which have informed the SSR assessments. London Borough of Wandsworth
6.4 6.4.1
6.4.2
The council recognised that very little of the structure would be above ground level. English Heritage
6.4.3
No comment. Environment Agency
6.4.4
No comment. Port of London Authority
6.4.5
No comment. Transport for London
6.4.6
No comment. Other statutory consultees
6.4.7 6.5 6.5.1
No comment. Planning comments A number of planning designations apply to the land both within and adjacent to the site. These designations and applicable policies have been identified and described in Section 6.3. The site falls within a designated archaeological priority area. The appropriate level of site investigation should be agreed with the LPA in accordance with policies TBE14 and TBE15. Further appraisal of the archaeological potential on the site is provided in Section 7. The proposal site is situated close to residential dwellings. The closest residents fall within approximately 5m from the operation area. The operation of the proposal site is likely to impact upon residential amenity due to noise, dust, vibration and traffic movements. It is unlikely that adequate mitigation would remedy these potential impacts due to the close proximity of the works. Furthermore, the car parking for the residents of Park View Court would be lost, and providing alternative car parking facilities within the immediate vicinity is likely to be difficult. The proposal site is also within close proximity to West Hill Primary School and mitigation would also be required to avoid potential amenity impacts on this sensitive receptor. The site is adjacent to the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area. With appropriate mitigation to reduce potential impacts on setting, appearance and local views, the proposal
6.5.2
6.5.3
6.5.4 6.5.5
Page 6
should not cause an unacceptable level of impact on this designation. Further appraisal of heritage considerations is provided in Section 7. 7 7.1 7.1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL Introduction The following sections summarise specialist assessments which are provided in Appendix 9 Environmental Appraisal Tables. Transport The site is suitable. However, use of the site would involve the loss of 40 residential and six on-street parking spaces. Some parking is available onsite for the workforce but on-street parking in the surrounding roads is unsuitable due to pay restrictions. However, there is the potential to use a nearby NCP car park to replace displaced parking and to provide for workforce shortfall. River access is not essential as excavated material would be transported to a main hub site by road. Access to the TLRN is only 500m away. However, routes to both rail and TLRN are constrained by the junction treatment at the Broomhill Rd/ Buckhold Rd junction, which may require removal. Rail transport is unlikely to be required due to the small volumes of excavated material produced by the site. There is reasonable potential for the workforce to use public transport to access the site. The connection culvert runs across the carriageway to the interception chamber, and these features would require temporary traffic management to enable construction. Archaeology The site is suitable as no records of archaeological remains have been identified, although due to a lack of previous investigations in the area, the nature and extent of archaeological receptors cannot be confidently predicted. With the currently available information, it is possible that archaeological receptors of high or medium value may be present within this site. While no direct evidence has been revealed, waterlogged remains and peat deposits of high or medium value may also be present. Built heritage and townscape The site is suitable because it would not result in any direct impacts upon the historic built environment and the local townscape character. Impacts upon the character of the site and some local views, as well as upon one Grade II listed building (Down Lodge, 75m to the southwest) and the Wandsworth Town Conservation Area could be mitigated through the scheme design and/or screening of the site. Water resources hydrogeology and surface water In terms of hydrogeology, the site is suitable because the drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (non-aquifer). The Chalk piezometric head is likely to be approximately 5.1m above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected. The superficial deposits are Kempton Gravel, which is classified as a minor aquifer at the shaft site. There would be a limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to the use of a diaphragm wall or caissons. In terms of surface water resources, this site is less suitable because there is potential for a clash with the Frogmore Storm Relief Sewer and, as such, specific mitigation would be required. However, there is no overland pathway for pollution to the surface water.
7.2 7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
7.3 7.3.1
7.4 7.4.1
7.5 7.5.1
7.5.2
Page 7
7.6 7.6.1 7.7 7.7.1
Ecology The site is suitable and may only require basic ecological surveys, if selected. Flood risk The site is suitable because it is within Flood Zone 1 and has less than a one in 1,000-year risk of flooding. There is limited space for SuDS onsite and an investigation is required to determine the suitability for infiltration SuDS. Air quality The site is less suitable for use as a CSO site as there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at nearby residential properties. These impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality. However, this can to some extent be mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours. Noise The site is less suitable due to the short distances to the nearest residential properties at Park View Court and Broomhill Road. Any shielding afforded by the site perimeter barriers would be largely ineffectual due to the height of these properties. It is also anticipated that a large number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route along Broomhill Road are likely to cause an adverse noise impact. Land quality
7.8 7.8.1
7.9 7.9.1
7.10
7.10.1 The site is less suitable, based on the moderate potential for contamination of the site to have occurred, specifically from the works and gas mantle operations historically undertaken in the vicinity of the site, and the potential presence of storage tanks in the vicinity of the site. This potentially poses a risk to construction workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact and inhalation exposure pathways. 8 8.1 8.1.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT Socio-economic profile The site is within the Southfields ward of the London Borough of Wandsworth. Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data show the following indicators for the ward, in comparison to the rest of Wandsworth, London and England as a whole: A higher rate of full-time employees and self-employed people. A higher rate of employment in professional occupations. A substantially higher proportion of people educated to Level 4/5 (degree level). Fewer people aged 19 or under, or 45 and over, (with comparably more people in their twenties and thirties). There is a high percentage of young children (aged 0-4 years), indicating that there is a growing population in the area. Approximately 82% people are white and around 74% of people were born in the UK. A higher proportion of residents reporting a good state of health. 8.1.2 Overall, this community profile suggests that the ward population consists of mainly young professionals.
Page 8
8.2 8.2.1
Issues and impacts Due to the engineering requirements for a CSO site in this location, the greatest potential impact, from a community impacts perspective, appears likely to be caused by the loss of the car park to Park View Court and the likely disturbance to residents living in close proximity to the works area. The surrounding land uses are mainly residential; therefore, similar noise related impacts are likely to affect residents in proximity to the site. Wandsworth Business Village is opposite the site to the east and is likely to experience some disruption from works on the site. Also in the vicinity to the northwest is the West Hill Primary School, which is potentially affected by the use of the site, and which also appears to offer some adult education services. PROPERTY ASSESSMENT Introduction The site under consideration as a CSO site comprises the car parking area and grounds for residential flats at Park View Court, Broomhill Road. Crown Land and Special Land comments The land is owned by Peverel Properties Limited and is used as car parking associated with the adjoining flats, which are also owned by Peverel. This site appears to be neither Crown Land nor Special Land and there should be no procedural difficulty in acquiring the land using compulsory purchase powers. Land to be acquired The working area is the car park to a block of flats that appears to have been built in 1992. The compensation assessment assumes that the worksite would be acquired temporarily, via the acquisition of new rights for the period of the works stated in the engineering section above. The operational phase would require the permanent acquisition of an area, with dimensions of approximately 15m by 15m, near the Broomhill Road frontage. Property valuation comments The freehold is owned by Peverel Properties Limited and is subject to various long leasehold interests in relation to the flats. There is no information to suggest what rights the leaseholders have over the car park area, but it is likely that rights exist. The planning history shows no recent search results for the site. It therefore appears that there are no intentions to redevelop the site. If compensation is assessed on the basis of diminution in value to the flats for the duration of the works and on a market value basis for the permanent acquisition, the costs are likely to be acceptable. If compensation is assessed on the basis that temporary car parking can be provided nearby for the duration of the works and on a market value basis for the permanent acquisition, the costs are likely to be acceptable. Disturbance compensation comments The site is used for parking and therefore there is not likely to be any significant disturbance compensation payable.
8.2.2 8.2.3
9 9.1 9.1.1
9.2 9.2.1
9.3 9.3.1 9.3.2
9.3.3
9.4 9.4.1
9.4.2 9.4.3
9.4.4
9.5 9.5.1
Page 9
9.6 9.6.1
Offsite statutory compensation comments There should be limited potential for offsite statutory compensation under Section 10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965, as there is unlikely to be any physical interference with public or private property rights. There should also be limited potential for claims under Part 1 of the Land Compensation Act 1973, as the completed works are unlikely to result in diminution in value to property. Site acquisition cost assessment The statutory acquisition costs are likely to be acceptable. SITE CONCLUSIONS BY DISCIPLINE Introduction
9.6.2
9.7 9.7.1 10 10.1
10.1.1 The conclusions presented in this section are drawn from each disciplines assessment , and are designed to inform the workshop where a final conclusion on whether the site moves forward as one of the preferred sites or not. 10.2 Engineering
10.2.1 This site is less suitable as a CSO site as it would be some distance away from the interception chamber and the proposed route for the connection culvert to the drop shaft would run under the main road for approximately 85m. Further investigations would be required to determine if the shortest route connection under the multi-storey residential building would be feasible. The shaft would be in very close proximity to residential buildings. However, the site would have good vehicular access and would be of adequate size. 10.3 Planning
10.3.1 On balance, the site is considered to be not suitable for use as a CSO site. 10.3.2 The site is located very close to residential properties and is likely to have a detrimental impact on residential amenity that would be very difficult to satisfactorily mitigate. Furthermore, the proposal site would result in the loss of residents car parking, and it is likely to be difficult to provide alternative facilities within the locality. 10.4 Environment
10.4.1 Overall, the site is considered to be suitable for use as a CSO site. 10.4.2 The site is suitable from the perspectives of transport, archaeology, built heritage and townscape, hydrogeology, ecology and flood risk. 10.4.3 The site is considered less suitable from the perspectives of surface water, air quality, noise and land quality. 10.4.4 Overall the site is considered suitable, subject to further investigation of whether air quality, noise, land quality and surface water impacts as well as transport and townscape impacts can all be adequately mitigated. Likely mitigation considerations would include the following: Transport provision of alternate parking for residents Townscape high-quality scheme design and/or screening would be required to protect the character of the area, including local views Air quality minimising of the movement of HGVs during peak hours may be required to mitigate local air quality impact
Page 10
Noise standard noise barriers are unlikely to be entirely effective and other techniques may be required to reduce construction noise to acceptable levels Surface water investigation of Frogmore Storm Relief Sewer site constraint Land quality any required remediation of contamination (at this moderate risk site) and / or measures to ensure no mobilisation of contaminants retained in situ. 10.5 Socio-economic and community
10.5.1 From a community impacts perspective, this site appears less suitable for use as a CSO site. Use of the site appears likely to have a significant impact on residents of Park View Court due to the disturbance of the works themselves and the loss of the car parking. 10.5.2 The site is adjacent to and opposite further residential dwellings, as well as the Wandsworth Business Village and West Hill Primary School. These also appear likely to be affected by the noise and visual disruption. Mitigation may be provided through limiting site hours and noise reduction measures to minimise any disturbance to the dwellings. 10.6 Property
10.6.1 This site is considered suitable as a CSO site. 10.6.2 The advantages of the site are as follows: Acquisition costs should be acceptable The site is relatively undeveloped. 10.6.3 The disadvantage of the site is as follows: The loss of parking and the execution of the works would create a significant amount of disruption for the occupiers of the adjoining flats.
Page 11
Site Suitability Report C07BD - Appendices
APPENDICES
Page 12
Site Suitability Report C07BD Appendix 1
APPENDIX 1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Engineering Traffic Management and Access Roads/Rail Scott Wilson Access River BMT Third Parties (Shafts/CSOs) Mott MacDonald and AECOM Geology Thames Water Utilities Thames Water and AECOM Construction and Operational Layout Template London Tideway Tunnels Background Technical Paper London Tideway Tunnels Planning London Borough of Wandsworth online planning applications database Saved policies in the Wandsworth Unitary Development Plan, adopted in August 2003, and the Consolidated London Plan, adopted in February 2008
Environment Transport Map of Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) - www.tfl.gov.uk Bus Route Maps: North-east, north-west, south-west, south-east - www.tfl.gov.uk Crossrail Plans - www.crossrail.co.uk/crossrail-bill-documents PTAL scores - Obtained from Table 2.3 information Thames Path map - www.walklondon.org.uk Capital Ring - www.walklondon.org.uk Cycle Routes - www.sustrans.org.uk and Local Cycling Guides, 1-14 Design Manual for Roads and Bridge TD 42/95, Highways Agency Built heritage and townscape Wandsworth List of Locally Listed Buildings National Monuments Record - for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens Unitary development plans Local authority websites Bing maps Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Environment Agency abstraction licence details Environment Agency groundwater levels Local authority details of unlicensed abstractors
Appendix 1 - Page 1
Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck Ecology Thames Estuary Partnership (2002) Tidal Thames Habitat Action Plan London Biodiversity Action Plan - www.lbp.org.uk Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) www.magic.gov.uk - statutory designated sites London Wildweb - http://wildweb.london.gov.uk - non-statutory site of importance for nature conservation Black redstart distribution in London www.blackredstarts.org.uk/pages/londonmap.html National Biodiversity Network - http://searchnbn.net - distribution of protected species Google Maps - aerial views of habitat features BAP habitats - www.natureonthemap.org.uk Priority habitats and species on national and local scales - www.ukbap.org.uk Flood risk Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck Air quality Local authority websites www.londonair.org.uk/london/asp/default.asp?la_id=&showbulletins=&width=1680 http://www.airquality.co.uk Noise Envirocheck - Identification of receptors Promap - Calculation of distances between site and receptors Multimap - Aerial photography www.multimap.co.uk Defra noise maps - Identification of existing noise levels Land quality Google Maps/Earth Site walkover information
Socio-economic and community Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data Parkview Court - http://homes.trovit.co.uk/index.php/cod.search_homes/type.2/ what_d.parkview%20court%20wandsworth http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/Home/CommunityServices/Businesssupport/ default.htm
Appendix 1 - Page 2
Streetcar - http://www.streetcar.co.uk/location.aspx?location=414 Wandsworth Business Village - http://www.rolfe-judd.co.uk/architecture/projects/ affordable-housing/wandsworth-business-village/#; and http://www.rolfejudd.co.uk/architecture/projects/affordable-housing/wandsworth-businessvillage/spec-sheet.pdf
Property Mouchel referencing data Rating records from VOA Website Promap Multimap/Live maps, etc Net House Price website
Appendix 1 - Page 3
APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN
Appendix 2 - Page 1
TI AL
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM
FI D
EN
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites
AF T
! (
CSO (Directly Controlled)
CS07B Frogmore Storm Relief - Buckhold Road CSO

WANDSWORTH C07BD
! (
0 50 100
200 Metres 300 400
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. (c) Crown copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way.
Map Ref : .......101PL-SS-00974 Date : .............2009/11/26 Projection : .....British National Grid
Thames Water Utilities

MAJOR PROJECTS
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
APPENDIX 2 C07BD SITE SITE LOCATION PLAN
APPENDIX 3 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLANS
Appendix 3 - Page 1
TI AL
EN
FI D
CR
LB
1
AD
&
HO
Triangle House
LD
CK
AF T
1 to
10
ew
Th
eM
ew
RT a r d B ON d y RO A
TCB
5
M M M
West Hill Centre (adult college)
M
5
M M M Works M M M
9 7
11 .8
bu
Jessica House
ry
M M
M M M
FB
M
Welsbach House
M M M M M M
16
Do wn
FB
The St Michael Steiner School
ME
M M M M M
30
Works
M M M M
WANDSWORTH
40
33
9.1m
C07BD
32
34
Traders Hall Multistorey Car Park
Multistorey Car Park Traders Hall
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
79
! ! !
34
Park View Court
b Sta El Su
14
16.2m
5.5m
Day Centre El
Day Centre
!
1 to 72 Albon House
! ! ! ! ! !
1 to 72 Edwyn House
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
1 to 72 Knowles House
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
73
72
74
75
Sub Sta Clinic
LB
! ! ! ! !
78
5.7m
Clinic
24
44
26
16.1m
2
Willow Court
37
Birch Court
71
1 to
70
35
54
69
M
SO U TH F IE LD S RO AD
Industrial Employment Areas 2008

66
Dunsford Court
28
Legend
13
Pine Court
5.7m
68
Lake
69
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
10
Downe Lodge
Mixed Use Areas
Calico Court
Children's Zoo
Nursery
! ! !
Site Allocations Document Sites !

25a
Town Stables Centre Other Frontages

Yard
1
78
Town Centre Core Frontages
78
!
59
Town Centre Secondary Frontages

61
Octavia House
86
FB
! !
Lake
! ! ! !
Town Centres
4
! !
31
30
91 to
94
M
11
Park View Court
M
9 to 20
King George's Park
!Multistorey ! Car ! Park !
32a
29
Multistorey Car Park
Traders Hall
95
45
to 6
78
76
BA LE
96
NO
Works
98
97
AR NG
TCB
25
NS DE
FB
C BU
Traders Hall
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
36
35
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
43
40
El Sub Sta
Southside Shopping Centre
19
99
O KH
24
23
MWorks M
The Business Village
A RO LD 5.4m
17
15.0m
FBs
20
103
to
30
1 07
104 to
Gardiner House
Works
14
Wand le
3
M M M M M ! ! CS07B ! ! ! Road ! ! CSO Frogmore Storm Relief - ! Buckhold ! Southside ! ! ! Shopping Centre !
127
1 to
Me ws
27
40
23
M M
M M
M M
M M
BU
48
M
1
M
2
RO
113
115
117
11 4
11 8
to
12
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
108
! !
12
Cockpen House
! (
! ! ! ! ! ! !
1 to 84 Wentworth Court
CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or 1 to 84 Eliot Court abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued ! ! incomplete in any way.
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
46
45
87
89
1 to
17
12.4m
25
201
203
205
209
8.5m
9 197 19
28
195
Wayside
TCB
Bdy s t & Ward Boro Con
187
CR
183 185
181
El Sub Sta
146
177
144
Sub Sta
El
Chapel Yard
Dutch Yard House
16
14
24
22
QU 'S S ICK DW HA R
AR E
Chapel Yard Shelter
107 109
Police Station
111
Bank
113
115 117
167
to 1
73
D WAN
161
140
Spencer Court
SW
119
159
H ORT
157
HIG
123
to
6.3m
125
HS
155
142
127 129
134
153
Tank
131
132
ET TRE
139
141 143
149 151
13
n cis S na od ry L ge
146b
BUSH AG ES CO TT
126 128
PH
124
5.2m
PH
Def
96
130
Def
92
138a
82
M
4.9m
Pipe Bridge
M M
M M
70
NEW
Ban k
TON RD 'S YA
ro Sim se C o u rt
DU TC
Su rg
Bo ro
AR HY
C on
st &
Re dL io n u Sq are
ery
W ard
B dy
Area of Main Map
Legend
Sudbury House
1 to 132
8 6
1 3
10 11
! (
8
O BR OM
H IL
L RO A
10 to
16
18
14
Arnd al e W al k
ale Arnd
11
e H ous
128
West Hill Primary School
15
! ! ! ! ! ! !
21
13
Lon g
10
20
1 to 16
LL E NEVI
cl if fe
40
60
80
H ous
G IL L
1 to 8
CL O
Metres
15
SE
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. (c) Crown copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345
32
33
15
21 to 32
21
IL NE V
BR OOMH
LE G IL
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
47
This plan is a strategic and standardised overview based on an interpretation of GIS policy and designation layers provided by affected London local authorities. Please refer to the text in the SSRs for the full planning and environment assessments.
76
37
ILL RO AD
LC L OS E
38
39
55
33
b Sta El Su
1 to 9
42
44

MAJOR PROJECTS
1 to 6 1 to 9
39
41
Title:
APPENDIX 3A C07BD SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLAN
81
25
27
BU CKHO AD LD RO
93
TI AL
EN
FI D
CR
LB
1
AD
RO
&
HO
Triangle House
LD
113
115
CK
117
AF T
1 to
10
ew
11 .8
16
Do wn
bu
Jessica House
FB
5
Welsbach House
ry
Th
eM
ew
TCB
5
ME
30
Works Works
Gardiner House
! !
32a
! !
1 to 8
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
5.5m
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
! !
Park
! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
IL NE V
! ! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
WANDSWORTH
40
33
9.1m
C07BD
15
32
! ! ! !
21 to 32 9 to 20
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
55
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
34
Traders Hall
Park View Court
! ! ! Multistorey Car Park ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Day
! ! Car ! Park ! Multistorey Traders Hall ! ! ! ! ! !

El
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
32
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! b Sta ! El Su
Day
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
14
16.2m
! ! Centre ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
FB
! Centre ! ! ! ! ! !
Albon House !
! ! ! ! !
75
! ! ! ! Clinic ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
79
!
BR OOMH
LB
! ! ! Sub Sta ! !
Clinic ! !
!
5.7m
45
72 ! ! 1 to!
78
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Lake
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
74
24
44
73
! ! !
26
72
16.1m
2
Willow Court
37
Birch Court
! ! ! ! !
5.7m
71
! ! ! !
1 to
70
54
35
69
Pine Court
Lake
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
1 to 72
68
! !
Edwyn
10
!
69
House ! !
Downe Lodge
66
Dunsford Court
28
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
1 to 72 Knowles House
78
Legend
25a
Calico Court
1 to 9
Children's Zoo
Nursery
Metropolitan Open Land Stables

! !
78
District Parks
Yard
1
!
81
! !
86
! !
! !
! !
Open Spaces
4
Octavia House
! ! !
BU CKHO
Play Equipment
! !
93
! ! !
! !
30
91 to
94
31
Park View Court
King ! !George's ! !
Multistorey Car ! ! ! ! !Park
29
! ! Multistorey Car Park
Traders Hall
! !
! !
95
to 6
78
76
BA LE
96
NO
Works
98
97
AR NG
TCB
25
NS DE
FB
9
C BU
Traders Hall
El Sub Sta

19
99
O KH
24
23
Works
A RO LD 5.4m
17
15.0m
FBs
20
FB
21
103
to
30
1 07
104 to
Works
14
Wand le
3

127 128
1 to
Me ws
27
11 4
BU
11 8
40
to
12
108
12
Cockpen House
! (
CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or 1 to 84 Eliot Court abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. This plan is a strategic and standardised overview based on an interpretation of GIS policy and designation layers provided by affected London local authorities. Please refer to the text in the SSRs for the full planning and environment assessments.
87
89
1 to
48
17
12.4m
25
23
201
203
205
209
8.5m
9 197 19
28
195
Wayside
TCB
187
CR
183 185
181
El Sub Sta
146
177
144
Sub Sta
El
Chapel Yard
Dutch Yard House
16
14
24
22
QU 'S S ICK DW HA R
AR E
Chapel Yard Shelter
107 109
Police Station
111
Bank
113
115 117
167
to 1
73
D WAN
161
140
Spencer Court
SW
119
159
H ORT
157
HIG
123
to
6.3m
125
HS
155
142
127 129
134
153
Tank
131
132
ET TRE
139
141 143
149 151
13
11
146b
BUSH AG ES CO TT
126 128
PH
124
5.2m
PH
Def
96
130
Def
92
138a
82
Pipe Bridge
NEW
Ban k
TON RD 'S YA
ro Sim se C o u rt
4.9m
70
DU TC
Su rg
Bo ro
AR HY
C on
st &
Re dL io n u Sq are
ery
W ard
B dy
Area of Main Map
Legend
Sudbury House
1 to 132
1 3
10 11
! (
8
O BR OM H IL L RO A
10 to
16
D
7
18
14
ale Arnd
11
Arnd
al e W
al k
e H ous
15
13
Lon g
10
20
1 to 16
LL E NEVI
cl if fe
40
60
80
H ous
G IL L
CL O
Metres
15
SE
33
34 35
21
36
LE
G IL
76
37
ILL RO AD
LC
L OS
38
39
33
40
b Sta El Su
1 to 9
42
1
13
43
44
45
47
46

MAJOR PROJECTS
1 to 6
39
41
Title:
APPENDIX 3B C07BD SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT PLAN
25
59
27
61
AD LD RO
TI AL
EN
FI D
CR
LB
1
AD
RO
&
CK
!! !
HO
Triangle House
LD
113
115
117
AF T
1 to
10
ew
11 .8
16
Do wn
bu
Jessica House
FB
5
Welsbach House
ry
Th
eM
ew
TCB
5
ME
30
Works Works
Gardiner House
WANDSWORTH
40
33
9.1m
C07BD
15
32
34
Traders Hall Multistorey Car Park

9 to 20
Multistorey Car Park Traders Hall

32
Park View Court
b Sta El Su
14
16.2m
5.5m
Day Centre El
Day Centre
79
Sub Sta Clinic
LB
5.7m
Clinic
1 to 72 Albon House
75
78
74
24
44
73
26
72
16.1m
2
Willow Court
37
Birch Court
71
1 to
70
54
35
69
Pine Court
5.7m
Lake
69
1 to 72 Edwyn House
68
10
Downe Lodge
66
Dunsford Court
28
Calico Court
1 to 9
Children's Zoo
Nursery
Legend !
25a
78
Listed Buildings Stables

Yard
1
4
78
Archaeological Areas Conservation Areas
Octavia House
86
1 to 72 Knowles FB House
Lake
31
30
91 to
94
Park View Court
King George's Park
32a
29
Traders Hall
95
45
to 6
78
76
BA LE
96
NO
Works
98
97
AR NG
TCB
25
NS DE
FB
9
C BU
Traders Hall
El Sub Sta

19
99
O KH
24
23
Works
A RO LD 5.4m
17
15.0m
FBs
20
FB
21
103
to
30
1 07
104 to
Works
14
Wand le
3

127 128
1 to
Me ws
27
11 4
BU
11 8
40
to
12
108
12
Cockpen House
! (
CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or 1 to 84 Eliot Court abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. This plan is a strategic and standardised overview based on an interpretation of GIS policy and designation layers provided by affected London local authorities. Please refer to the text in the SSRs for the full planning and environment assessments.
87
89
1 to
48
17
12.4m
25
23
201
203
205
209
8.5m
9 197 19
28
195
Wayside
TCB
187
CR
183 185
181
El Sub Sta
146
177
144
Sub Sta
El
Chapel Yard
Dutch Yard House
16
14
24
22
QU 'S S ICK DW HA R
AR E
Chapel Yard Shelter
107 109
Police Station
111
Bank
113
115 117
167
to 1
73
D WAN
161
140
Spencer Court
SW
119
159
H ORT
157
HIG
!
Ban k
123
to
6.3m
125
HS
155
142
127 129
134
153
Tank
131
132
ET TRE
139
141 143
149 151
13
11
146b
BUSH AG ES CO TT
126 128
PH
124
5.2m
PH
Def
96
130
Def
92
138a
82
Pipe Bridge
NEW
TON RD 'S YA
ro Sim se C o u rt
4.9m
70
DU TC
Su rg
Bo ro
AR HY
C on
st &
Re dL io n u Sq are
ery
W ard
B dy
Area of Main Map
Legend
Sudbury House
1 to 132
1 3
10 11
! (
8
O BR OM H IL L RO A
10 to
16
D
7
18
14
ale Arnd
11
Arnd
al e W
al k
e H ous
15
13
Lon g
10
20
1 to 16
LL E NEVI G IL L
cl if fe
40
60
80
H ous
1 to 8
CL O
Metres
15
SE
33
21 to 32
34 35
21
IL NE V
BR OOMH
36
LE G IL
76
37
ILL RO AD
LC L OS E
38
39
55
33
40
b Sta El Su
1 to 9
42
1
13
43
44
45
47
46

MAJOR PROJECTS
1 to 6
39
41
Title:
APPENDIX 3C C07BD SITE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT HERITAGE PLAN
81
25
59
27
61
BU CKHO AD LD RO
93
APPENDIX 4 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDINGS
Appendix 4 - Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
Area of Main Map
AF T
Legend
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites CSO (Directly Controlled)
&
! (
50
100
200
300
400
Metres
WANDSWORTH

C07BD
! (

MAJOR PROJECTS
Title:
APPENDIX 4 C07BD SITE AERIAL PLAN
View of site from the existing entrance facing south.
View of site facing east.
Appendix 4
APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN
Appendix 5 - Page 1
EN
TI AL FI D
&
Legend
Area of Main Map
AF T
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Sites CSO (Directly Controlled) Transport Access Routes TfL Road Network Thames Path
! (
London Cycle Routes
! (
CS07A Frogmore Storm Relief - Bell Lane Creek CSO
0 0.035 0.07
0.14
Km
0.21
0.28
0.35
WANDSWORTH
! (
On-street parking
C07BD
Map Ref : ........... 101PL-SS-00704 Date : ................. 2009/11/19 Projection : ......... British National Grid

MAJOR PROJECTS
Title:
APPENDIX 5 C07BD SITE TRANSPORT PLAN
T
21
ow
gr
28
26
Wa
Chu
nds
Par
rch
wo rth ish
32
Hall
lS
ub
W
9
24 16 14
38
22
12 20 10
SIGNAGE INDICATING BROOMHILL ROAD an dl eM CLOSED AHEAD, ACCESS ONLY, NO ew s

13
3
1
B
8 6 4
4 3
6.
3
2m
ARM
OUR
YW
14
14
en
24
5m
52
50
12
P
13
54
56
ANO
NG
58
50
62
62
15
32 a
3 2
PL A
10
7t o1 73
IN
R TH
GA
76
IN
to
33
74
PA
(a
14
1 to 40 27
2
84
90
44
a 84 b 84
or
86
ou
92
90
ou
54
2
1
NO ENTRY SIGNS REMOVED W

W
se
B Y
or
.1
m
1 4
33
35
16
1t o
10
SO
ie
38
16
e
3 9
C irc ou h rt
C BU
45 to 6 0
KH
D OL
26
RO
AD
9m
B
P ri
ip e
y
ld nc hi a C uid G nit U
dg
18
C
50
78
al
ic
CSO CONNECTION CULVERT

C ou rt
20 to 30
st
22
S M ou ewth f s iel
28
ds
O
2
se
13
SIGNAGE INDICATING ROAD CLOSED, FOR ACCESS TO BROOMHILL ROAD FOLLOW DIVERSION
78
al
S Sh op
ou
th
M C
2
ar
ul
de re
83
ra
tis k
rs
16
10
to
al
l T
.4
ar
M ra
ul
14
rs
86
.4
11
11 4
.6
ur
se
ic C lin ic
Ar
11
an
ta
m
32
1 0 0
11
5.
79
8m
78
us
to
73
E H dw ou yn se
74
72
ou
12
rt
B G ro
ur
ia
un
d
S he lt
72
1
38
to
84
71
4 12
70
El
lS
io
tC
ub
ou
St
rt
lS
AB
SECOND ISSUE St a
Description
ub
13
6
1 34
69
AA FIRST ISSUE
Iss
6. 2m
68
S G So ut h ur L
14 2
ik
h
14
8m
on
en
do
ni
n
5
T 4m
ou
rt
El
Su
14
9.
MA
ak
bS
e K H no se
1 w
ta
PLE
to s
TO
NR
72
OA
ou
le
FB
in
The Point, 7th Floor,

B ur ia
eo
rg
37 North Wharf Road,

lG ro
12
ni
80
lS
ub
Location / Town:
St a
LONDON N/A
7
16 8
to
12
12
Site Name: Project Name:
10
7. .5 m
4m
ow
lin
13
to
18
re
en
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Pa
vi
lio
al
22
ou
se
10 m
ul tis to re y C ar
100 m
to
N
7
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT

Drawing Title:
MA
Pa rk
PL
ET
6.
ON
4m
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN WANDSWORTH - C07BD

6
9
8
CR
SCALE 1 : 1000
ES
Drawing No.:
17
Scale:
Sheet Size:
Rev:
CE
PLOTTED ON
19\01\10
BY
Andy.Purdy
LOCATION :
32
Thames Tideway Tunnel
x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\Infrastructure\Routewide\100-DE-TRA-C07BD-847001.dgn
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008

4
P
AVEN ING TERR ACE
1
NT
100-DE-TRA-C07BD-847001
1:1000
A1
AB
50
to
El S ub
Sta
10
.3
hs
78
st
Pa
rk
So
Paddington, London W2 1AF

un d B ur ia
ut
id
lG
Location Code:
ro un d
OS Reference:
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
en
Sh
N/A
Project Group:
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
op
ou
rt
pi
6.
ng
2m
en
LTTDT
WASTE
tr
100
ar
8.
dw
43
to
th
to
11
75
or
51
en
tw
el
be
ck
ou
se
er
6.
6m
IL MJL
Dsgnr
GT AJW
Chkd
GT MRW
Appd
15-01-10 29-07-09
Date
150
84
TC
3m
6.
eu
M H oe et u in se g
P
33
.2
16
se
ub
St
ak
ou
on
lS
13
31
lb
A
9 3
72
30
Wa rd CR Bdy
to
15
17
ry
S lin
ub
19
29
91
18
tr
21
to
en
94
TRAFFIC DIVERSION ROUTE

13
re
D C
ay
AREA OF ACCESS ONLY 5

2
Ar
nd
ale
alk
nd
k P H
ale
5.
Ho
7m
IG
us
ST
AREA OF
R EE TEMPORARY WORKS T
TH
PEDESTRIAN DIVERSION ROUTE
AREA OF EXCAVATION (INDICATIVE)
ALTERNATIVE ACCESS ROUTE
200mm
hi
ta
ld
25
bS
tr
Su
Pa
rk
L
1t
24
en
El
ar
96
20
ay
23
re
98
95
tis
to
al
81
rk
ul
97
al
ar
Pa
de
rs
99
PEDESTRIAN DIVERSION ROUTE

FIND
de
tis
to
re
ra
10
ar
re
4t o
ar
to
10
tis
10
ul
SIGNAGE INDICATING BROOMHILL ROAD CLOSED AHEAD, FOR ACCESS FOLLOW DIVERSION
pi
si C
ng
de tr
en
e
1
S H
12 7
to
ou bu se ry
5. 6m
ud
13
87
a H CSO INTERCEPTION CHAMBER ou via
ct
de
rs
89
55
10
11
12
59
S El
ub
Sta
36
66
ou
rt
ar
pe
10
ie
ha
10
rk
Pa
ou
es
rt
ill SHAFT CSO DROP ag
11
UT
HF
EL
in
Pa
1
ks EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND HANDLING AREA e

rk
us
11
DS
Th
D OA
CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY TURNING W i HEAD (NOTE: TURNING HEAD SHOWN C llow ou rt ONLY SUITABLE FOR SMALL VEHICLES)
ks
or
Pi S Y ar ta
ne
OFFICES, WELFARE AND CANTEEN

1 to 8 9 to
bl
D ur PEDESTRIAN DIVERSION ROUTE ow t es L ne od g

M
C H oc ou k sepe SIGNAGE INDICATING BROOMHILL n ROAD CLOSED AHEAD, FOR ACCESS FOLLOW DIVERSION
2
EXISTING ACCESS TO CAR PARK

5.
EXISTING ACCESS TO CAR PARK

to 9
5. 7m
5m
BUCK
5
HOLD
m
.4
ROAD

11
ALTERNATIVE CAR PARK ACCESS

un
70
ROAD AND FOOTWAY CLOSURE
s ou for rt d
K P
5. 7m
in
ar
B
10 8
eo
rg
ra
or
11
7 11
11
16
or
ks
ks
9.
1m
STOCKYARD, WORKSHOP AND STORE

8
1t o
12
14
ac
1t o
REMOVE ROAD WIDTH RESTRICTION ISLAND
sb
48
el
25
17
se
ne
UA
12
0
1
ar
di
12
ks
HA
G
CK
ta
RD
WI
ub
SQ
RE
ar
)
7
16
ge
lle
se
co
du
C lt
en
tr
ill
si
ca
22
ou
.2
EXISTING ONE-WAY STREET
tH
es
24
Sim
49
16
es
15
15
an
SS
ll
AG
Sa
in
ts
15
15
PARKING SUSPENDED ON ONE SIDE OF BROOMHILL ROAD, EXISTING ONE-WAY SIGNAGE REMOVED AND ORDERS SUSPENDED CONVERTING STREET TO TWO-WAY USEAGE J
15
L S A
se
16
RDE
NS
ou
ar
B
9 8
an
k
AL
W A
ch
LEB
RIN
AN
ON
D
3
ut
16
25
TRAFFIC DIVERSION ROUTE 0
10
SW O
10
to
23
17
JUNCTION AMENDED TO ALLOW LEFT TURN MANOEUVRES

Pr im
3m
RE
ET
11
18
18
oo
ch
el
18
ha
rS
11
to
ei
ne
ic
TH
6.
10
18
10
St
he
St
Dow
T
Mew nbury
19 5
19
m
1
.0
19
15
1
20
13
2
13 0
12
6
CA R
AN
DS
12
OR
12
HI
10
GH
ST
10
1a
TS
hu
5.
rc
h
6
2m
EXISTING ONE-WAY STREET
ar
ag
13
C d
ha
pe
P
96
Ki
ng
Ar
ms
Ya
rd
4.
11
he
lt
er
an
41
ME
3
o 1t
03
N RTO
20
ROA
16
ARD
ENS
Wa
rd B
dy
ri an g ou le se
209
LEB
7
30
st
1t o
12
11.8
9
CR
43
1t o
16
10
45
8.
ou
rt
1 to 12
ce
ar
ag
47
Bd
Sp
G
6
1 to 8
5.
0m
24
2
L
ar
26
to 12
49
ns
t&
to
14
1 to 16
Co
1t o
ro
ES
The
Mew
Bo
S oli 14 tat ce 6 io n
AG
51
LARGE VEHICLES (EXCEPT CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES), FOLLOW DIVERSION FOR THROUGH ROUTES
AY
Bo ltin
18
42
BU
SH
CO
TT
1 to 8
St
32
1 to 8
37
ou
nd
ho s
S m as
M
8
ew
ay
Pl
ay
si
de T an
7
14
k
.8
m
14
P
6b
12
.4
or
ks
16 to 24
SEDLEIGH ROAD
Bra
zil H
ous
Mid
Ho
dlem use
ill
30
1 to 8
28
gH
ous
5 to 8 13 to 1 6
1
RINGFORD ROAD
25 to 30
er
HI
LL
31
ES
1
C
0t o 22
ou
rt
15
6
5
to
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
C
Wo
23
od ham sH ous e
3a
78
7a
7a
76a
76
13
64
39
49
68
63
71
HALDON ROAD
A D H A T O H R JEP
11h
27 to 29
31
to 1 9
ar
ar
LEB AN ON
Status:
20 to 2 5
E S l S
WORK IN PROGRESS
ub
29
RO AD
We
stm
inst
er C
Keyplan:
ta
33
9a
41
9d
B H
re
Vi
ou
er
1 to 8
ne
se
Ho
use
Fu lle Ho rs us e
W
63
14
or
ks
W ork s
or
13 8a
ks
43
THIS DRAWING
2
B
2 0
49
77
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE

or SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN ks COPYRIGHT AND P DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED H
1 6
51
61
ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN 4 METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT
m DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
Pi pe Br
Go v tO ffi ce
.1
Red Lio nS qua re
TE RS YA RD
id
ge
NOTES TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW: 1. 2.

1 3
Su rge ry
6.
3m
DUT CH YAR D
3. tu di os 4.
5.
W CARRIAGEWAY CLOSURE OF SOUTHERN END OF BROOMHILL D AR ROAD, APPROXIMATE CLOSURE LENGTH 75m. MO UR ks r Y ACCESS ONLY TO NORTHERN SECTION OF BROOMHILL o W e l ROAD, EXISTING ONE-WAY RESTRICTION REMOVED, NO d n a W rCONSTRUCTION LARGE VEHICLES (EXCEPT VEHICLES) AND ve Ri TEMPORARY TURNING HEAD CONSTRUCTED. SINGLE SIDE OF PARKING SUSPENDED IN BROOMHILL ROAD TO ALLOW TWO-WAY RUNNING, DETAILS TO BE AGREED WITH LOCAL AUTHORITY. TWO DIVERSION ROUTES REQUIRED UTILISING BUCKHOLD ROAD, WANDSWORTH HIGH STREET AND MERTON ROAD. S ta WESTERN FOOTWAY CLOSED AT JUNCTION BETWEEN bl es BROOMHILL ROAD AND BUCKHOLD ROAD, PEDESTRIANS DIVERTED TO EASTERN FOOTWAY.
ar y Sc
W es tH
G FO RD RO A D
67
ho ol
ill
BRO OM R OAHIL D L
5
AY
11
NE WT ON S
7 to 9
ros e
YA
73
RD
Co urt
B an k
Ch urc h
21
Ro w
HA LDO OA NR D
89
79
D ef
f De
1
PROVISIONAL DURATIONS: MAIN SITE - 18-20 MONTHS ROAD CLOSURE - 9 MONTHS (APPROX) TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PHASES - 1
1 5
97
92
25 a
3 7 1 to 9
82
BR
re
13
20
OO HI L L RO
21 to 32
er
1 to 6
AD
4.
4 1
8m Sa C
lv
at
it
io
11 5
ad
el
rm
R
120 118 to
ST
EE
SH
OR
59
EH
AM
CL
OS
NE
6 1
VI LL EG I LL CL OS E
114
5.
E u b
121
0m
ta
Bo ro Co nst &
68
W ard Bd y
6 7
KEY
18
12 8
AREA OF ROAD/ FOOTWAY CLOSURE

6
5
To
SITE AREA
ON C LOSE
81
18
16
10 t
al
M ER TO N RO AD
81
0 6
o1
NE VIL LE G
5 4
on g cli f
o1
68
BU C KH OL D
fe
ILL CL OS E
Ho us e
N A
9
13 5
1a
to
14
11a
SW D
RO AD
R O
GA
95
RR AT T
11
34 35
LA NE
1 0 5
10 5a
36
11
to
37
27
17 to
10
15 to 23
9
1 1 1
39
40
25 to 35
42
43
44
45
46
47
58
51
60
NEV GI IL LLE CLO

SE
13
Ch ildr en s Ho me
10 11
25
13
14 15
SM
LO
WE
APPENDIX 6 SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN
Appendix 6 - Page 1
APPENDIX 7 CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT
Appendix 7 - Page 1
APPENDIX 8 OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT
Appendix 8 - Page 1
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
VENTILATION COLUMN (CSO)
Status:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Keyplan:
N
A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND 107m (AOD +100) REMOVABLE COVER ABOVE WEIR (LOCKABLE) DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
NOTE:
4m
3m
6m
1. STRUCTURE TO BE PROTECTED BY REMOVABLE HANDRAILS IN THE TEMPORARY CASE. 2. POSITION OF COVERS ARE VARIABLE WITHIN 10m FROM THE EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE LOCATION IS BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT 3. CLADDING OF VENTILLATION BUILDING TO SUIT LOCATION AND AESTHETICS. 4. ALL TOP STRUCTURES TO HAVE:ACCESS STAIRS/LADDER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT HAND RAILING 5. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. GROUND LEVEL
10000
5m
REMOVABLE COVERS ARE SPLIT UP INTO SECTIONS AND SUPPORTED BY BEAMS, WHICH ARE ALSO REMOVABLE
1m DIA
SCALE 1:50
DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF TOP STRUCTURE ABOVE CSO SHAFTS ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK (CSO)
- - - - - - 1500 - - AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS

Dsgnr
GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
27-11-09 - 22-05-09
Date
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
60
2000
Location Code: OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
---
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
LTTDT
Location / Town: Site Name: Project Name:
WASTE LONDON N/A 50

Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT

Drawing Title:
SCALE 1:25
GENERIC ELEVATION AND TOP STRUCTURE FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT - CSO SITES
Drawing No.:
PLOTTED ON
04\12\09
BY
Andy.Purdy
LOCATION :
Thames Tideway Tunnel
x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\planning-consents\Routewide\100-DH-GEN-00000-000001.dgn
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
100-DH-GEN-00000-000001
NTS
A1
AB
100
150
200mm
VARIBLE DEPENDING ON
APPENDIX 9 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL TABLES
Transport Site considerations Access to road network Comments Site to be accessed via existing access on Broomhill Road. Access suitable, however, up to 6 on street parking bays may need to be removed in order to improve visibility to the left and to provide a sufficient swept path for HGVs turning left out of the site. Right turn movement out of site not possible due to no entry restriction on Broomhill Road to north of access. Permanent access proposed through a different site access further south. Broomhill Road is subject to a 30mph speed limit and is lit. On street parking located on Broomhill Road, however, this will not restrict HGV access. On street parking available to resident permit holders and pay and display ticket holders, but latter subject to four hour limit, therefore unsuitable for workforce. Site located within 500m of TLRN strategic highway network. Route to TLRN largely unconstrained however raised junction / table at Broomfield Rd/ Buckhold Rd junction may need removing. See Transport Access Plan in Appendix 5. Access to river River access not required for CSO site. River access not required as excavated material will be transported away by road. Possible rail connection at Clapham Junction. Route to rail link acceptable, although raised junction / table at Broomfield Rd/ Buckhold Rd junction a constraint. Mitigation required and conclusions Site access suitable however may require removal of on street parking bays. Parking survey may be required to assess impact of removing parking bays, particularly on overnight parking. TLRN strategic highway network only 500m away. Only constraint is raised junction which may need removing.
Access to rail
Access to rail unlikely to be required due to small volumes of excavated material produced by the site. Possible use of existing rail connections to the sidings at Clapham Junction. Rail link only Appendix 9 - Page 1
Transport Site considerations Comments 2.3 km from site. Raised junction / table at Broomfield Rd/ Buckhold Rd junction only constraint. Parking Site is an existing residential car park. Use of site would remove up to approximately 40 off street residential parking bays. Also 6 on-street bays will also be lost to provide access. Unlikely that this level of parking could be accommodated on street within the vicinity of the site, however NCP located within easy walking distance. Opportunity to provide residential parking within the NCP car park, however, likely to meet strong opposition from residents. Some parking could be provided onsite for construction vehicles/workforce. NCP car park located within walking distance of site Other on-street parking not feasible given 4-hour pay and display limit. Public transport accessibility PTAL 3-4 (Medium) as identified within Table 2.3. Removal of some on-street parking bays on Broomhill Rd. Removal of raised junction at Broomhill Rd/ Buckhold Rd junction also required. The connection culvert runs across the carriageway to the interception chamber and these features would require temporary traffic management to enable construction. Reasonable potential for workforce to use public transport to access site. Removal of some on-street parking bays on Broomhill Rd. Removal of raised junction at Broomhill Rd/ Buckhold Rd junction also required. Site will displace residential parking (both in car park and some on-street). Opportunities to relocate residential parking to NCP car park, however opposition issues. Would also require buy in from NCP. Some construction site parking could be provided onsite. Surrounding streets not suitable for workforce parking. Mitigation required and conclusions
Traffic Management
Summary: The site is suitable site access is possible. However use of the site will involve the loss of 40 residential and 6 on-street parking spaces. Some parking is available onsite for the workforce but on-street parking on the surrounding roads is unsuitable due to pay restrictions. However there is the potential to use a nearby NCP car park to replace displaced parking and to provide for workforce shortfall. River access is not essential as excavated material will be transported to a main hub site by road. Access to the TLRN only 500m away however routes to both rail and TLRN constrained by the junction treatment at the Broomhill Rd / Buckhold Rd junction which may require removal. Rail transport is unlikely to be required due to the small
Appendix 9 - Page 2
Transport Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
volumes of excavated material produced by the site. There is reasonable potential for workforce to use public transport to access site. The connection culvert runs across the carriageway to the interception chamber and these features would require temporary traffic management to enable construction.
Appendix 9 - Page 3
Archaeology Site considerations Designations, including Archaeological Priority Areas Comments The site is within the Wandsworth Archaeological priority Area. Mitigation required and conclusions A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Summary of historical uses
The site does not appear to have been developed until the 1930s with a single large building labelled on the 1962 OS as TA Cent. No archaeological receptors are recorded within the site. An archaeological evaluation and excavation took place in 1992 immediately to the north east of the site. The work revealed brick lined watercourses and structural remains of post medieval date. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of high value being present within the site. No archaeological receptors are recorded within the site. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of medium value being present within the site. None recorded
Potential receptors of very high or high value with the potential to be directly affected
Potential receptors of medium value with the potential to be directly affected
A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. Mitigation methods could include: Desk based assessment Production of deposits model
Other receptors with the potential to be directly affected
Extent of existing disturbance (if known) (new - review borehole data for made ground if borehole data is easily available through this project) Potential issues
The large building erected in the 1930s may have disturbed archaeological deposits of Medieval or earlier date. Geotechnical data is currently insufficient to assess below ground conditions. Detailed design proposals, and an outline method statement will be required to enable initial assessment of development impacts, and to inform mitigation proposals.
Appendix 9 - Page 4
Archaeology Site considerations Comments With the currently available information it is not possible to highlight specific potential issues. Mitigation required and conclusions Archaeological monitoring of geotechnical investigations Archaeological evaluation Archaeological watching brief Archaeological excavation. Summary: The site is suitable as no records of archaeological remains have been identified, although due to a lack of previous investigations in the area the nature and extent of archaeological receptors cannot be confidently predicted. With the currently available information it is possible that archaeological receptors of high or medium value may be present within this site. While no direct evidence has been revealed, waterlogged remains and peat deposits of high or medium value may also be present.
Appendix 9 - Page 5
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Designations including Conservation Areas, including trees Comments Listed Buildings Down Lodge, Merton Road, Grade II: 80m 140-142 Wandsworth High Street, Grade II: 180m Church of All Saints, Wandsworth High Street, Grade II*: 230m 1-6 Church Row, Grade II*: 250m 23 West Hill, Grade II: 175m 25 & 27 West Hill, Grade II: 185m 29 & 31 West Hill, Grade II: 190m 33 West Hill, Grade II: 205m 35 & 37 West Hill, Grade II: 215m Milestone (opposite No, 37), West Hill, Grade II: 245m Locally Listed Buildings There are no locally listed buildings within 250m of C07BD. Conservation Areas Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area: 15m West Hill Road Conservation Area: 130m Registered Historic Parks & Garden There are no registered historic parks and gardens within 250m of C07BD. Locally Listed Parks and Gardens There are no locally listed parks and gardens with 250m of C07BD. Protected Views There are no protected views within 250m of C07BD. Mitigation required and conclusions In the case of listed buildings and conservation areas, a high quality scheme design and adequate screening for the development may be required, as discussed below. A detailed desk-based assessment in conjunction with archaeology work will be required to further determine the likely impact of the development and to inform more detailed mitigation proposals.
Appendix 9 - Page 6
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be directly affected Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be directly affected Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Comments Not Applicable Mitigation required and conclusions Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
There is the potential for 10 listed buildings (two Grade II* and eight Grade II listed buildings) and 2 conservation areas (the Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area and the West Hill Road Conservation Area) to be indirectly affected by C07BD.
Of the 10 listed buildings within 250m of C07BD, only one (Down Lodge, Merton Road, Grade II) shares a visual relationship with the site. The development therefore has the potential to impact upon the setting of this listed structure and mitigation in the form of a high quality scheme design and/or screening may be required. The other 9 listed buildings are unlikely to experience any impact and mitigation will therefore not be required. C07BD shares a visual relationship with the Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area which is located to the north of the site. The development therefore has the potential to have a visual impact upon the setting of and views to and from the designated area. Mitigation in the form of a sensitively designed scheme and/or screening may therefore be required to reduce any visual impacts. In contrast, the West Hill Road Conservation Area is screened from the site by numerous buildings and no visual impact is therefore expected or any form of mitigation required.
Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be indirectly affected
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Appendix 9 - Page 7
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Sensitive landscape character areas likely to be affected, including trees and TPOs Comments Site in Locally Significant Industrial Area. Sensitive site located on residential parking area is contained by Broomhill Road to the west and Buckhold Road to the east. Residential properties along its western boundary, high-rise residential properties beyond adjacent properties located to the south and east, commercial properties to the north. The presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings would result in temporary, direct adverse impacts on the character of the site and temporary, indirect adverse impacts on neighbouring areas. Permanent elements would result in permanent, adverse direct impacts on the character of the open space. Potential views likely to be affected Open views from Broomhill Road and residential properties along it. Open views from high-rise residential properties. Partially interrupted views from residential properties in Pine Court and Calico Court. During construction, views of cranes from surrounding residences. Permanent elements visible to adjacent residences and users of Broomhill Road. During construction, the use of hoardings and appropriate lighting would help minimise visual impact. Design of top structure, vent column, and electrical kiosk to be given careful consideration. Planting to screen permanent plant. Site is surrounded by residential properties with open views. This site is suitable only with appropriate mitigation listed above. Any permanent structures would need to be of a high quality design and/or screened in order that the visual impact of the development upon the Grade II listed Down Lodge and the Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area Mitigation required and conclusions Retention of trees where possible and protection in accordance with BS 5837. Introduction of landscape scheme to include appropriate surface treatments and planting. Presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings onsite would adversely impact character of site, especially during construction. This site is suitable only with appropriate mitigation listed above and by containing the permanent elements onsite to one corner.
Particular considerations on sites where new permanent structures are required
Permanent structures at C07BD have the potential to have an indirect effect upon one Grade II listed building (Down Lodge, Merton Road) and the Wandsworth Town Centre Conservation Area. The appearance of any above ground structures would need to
Appendix 9 - Page 8
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments be carefully considered in the scheme design and some form of screening for the site may be required. Potential issues The development could result in an indirect impact upon the character of the site and some local views, one listed building and one conservation area. However, there is the potential to mitigate any adverse impacts through a high quality scheme design and/or screening. Mitigation required and conclusions is minimised in accordance with planning policy and English Heritage guidance. The scheme design will need to be of a sufficiently high quality and may need to incorporate some screening in order that the potential visual intrusiveness of the development upon one listed building and one conservation area is mitigated.
Summary: The site is suitable because it will not result in any direct impacts upon the historic built environment and the local townscape character. Impacts upon the character of the site and some local views as well as upon one Grade II listed building and one conservation area could be mitigated through the scheme design and/or screening of the site.
Appendix 9 - Page 9
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Hydrogeological conditions (Groundwater and Surface Water) From BGS Geological Model giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river Comments Geology (thickness) Superficial Geology and Made Ground (8m) London Clay (53m) Lambeth Group (16m) Thanet sand (11m) Hydrogeology Piezometric Level in Chalk Aquifer: ~ -20 mAOD (~28 mbgl) from EA Jan 08 water level contouring Groundwater Monitoring Location EA Hydrometry Sites: TQ27-159 - approximately 330m northeast of the site (water levels to March 2009) Watercourses River Thames approximately 500m away to south Pond located approx. 100m away to southeast SPZs and groundwater users SPZ Not located in a Source Protection Zone EA Licensed Groundwater Abstractions and Details No public water supply 4 licensed abstraction boreholes within 2 km radius
Licence Numbers: 1. 28/39/39/0177 (2 boreholes) 2. 28/39/42/0071 (1 borehole) 3. 28/39/41/0081 (1 borehole) Locations: 1. 1.48km northwest of the site (other side of the River Thames) 2. 1.11km northeast of the site 3. 209 m south of the site Operator: 1. Trustees of the Hurlingham Club
Mitigation required and conclusions The drop shaft will be constructed to an invert level of approximately 33.11mbgl therefore the shaft will be founded in the London Clay. Piezometric head in Chalk is approximately 5.11m above the base of the construction.
A simple volumetric approach has been used to calculate the 400 days travel times of the abstraction borehole. A conservative mean annual recharge of 100 mm/year was used to calculate a radius for licensed abstraction boreholes as follows:
1. 109m 2. 137m 3. 80m
As a result, the shaft is not located within any of these catchment areas.
Appendix 9 - Page 10
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Comments

2. Hanson Quarry Prod Europe Ltd 3. London Borough of Wandsworth Abstracted Aquifer Unit: 1.Gravel 2. Chalk 3. Chalk Abstraction Purposes: 1. Industrial, commercial and public service (sports grounds/facilities- spray irrigation) 2. Industrial, commercial and public service (mineral products-general use) 3. Industrial, commercial and public service (municipal grounds-make up or top up water) Abstraction Quantity (annual): 1. 15,000m3 2. 23,515m3 3. 8,000m3
Mitigation required and conclusions
Local Authorities (LA) Unlicensed Groundwater Abstractions and Details No abstraction borehole within 1km radius inside Wandsworth Council Boundary borehole locations and depths There are historical records of 2 deep water wells within 1 km radius. Depth range: 101.8 192.02m Potential impacts on surface water features The site is located approximately 500 metres south of the River Thames. There is a pond located approximately 100 metres to the south east of the site. There is no overland pathway to a water course or to the pond. There is a possible clash between the interception chamber and the Frogmore storm relief sewer which would need specific mitigation to prevent the sewer backing up and to prevent it becoming a pathway for pollution to the surface water. Work needs to be undertaken in consideration of Pollution Prevention Guidelines PPG1, PPG5 and PPS23. Not applicable.
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Potential impacts on groundwater (resources and quality) Comments No impact on groundwater at depth is likely since the drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (non aquifer). At shallow depth, the shaft is located in Kempton Gravel which is classified as a minor aquifer. Limited impact on shallow aquifer if water is excluded from the excavation by diaphragm wall or caissons. No mitigation required if groundwater is not impacted. The drop shaft to be excavated in London Clay but to below piezometric head in Chalk. Potential pressure effects. Limited impact on flow in shallow aquifer. Mitigation required and conclusions See below (likely types of mitigation measures that will be required)
Likely types of mitigation measures that will be required Potential issues
Not applicable Confined head in Chalk to be considered as part of geotechnical design. Impact on and mitigation for shallow aquifer will depend on construction design.
Summary: In terms of hydrogeology, the site is suitable because the drop shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (non aquifer). The Chalk piezometric head is likely to be approximately 5.1m above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected. The superficial deposits are Kempton Gravel which is classified as a minor aquifer at the shaft site. There will be limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to diaphragm wall or caissons. In terms of surface water resources, this site is less suitable because there is a potential for a clash with the Frogmore Storm Relief Sewer and as such, specific mitigation would be required. However, there is no overland pathway for pollution to the surface water.
Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Statutory designations Non-statutory designated wildlife sites BAP priority habitats protected or otherwise notable species within the Study Area Comments None within 2km Site is adjacent to King Georges Park BGII site of importance for nature conservation There are no BAP habitats onsite. Buildings adjacent to the site could have potential for roosting bats. Mitigation required and conclusions None required None required as no landtake and site separated by busy road. None required Careful placement of lighting to minimise illumination of surrounding habitat is likely to be required. No other issues
Potential issues
No other issues
Summary: The site is suitable and may only require basic ecological surveys if selected.
Flood risk assessment Site considerations Flood Risk Zone Comments The site is located within Flood Zone 1 and as such there is less than a 1 in 1000 year risk of flooding. There is limited space onsite for SuDS. However, the site is a brownfield site and the superficial geology is such that an investigation into the suitability of infiltration SuDS is required. Attenuation SuDS would be a possibility. Potential issues No other issues No other issues Mitigation required and conclusions A FRA would not be required to assess the risk of flooding to the site. N/A
Assessment of conditions for SuDS
Summary: The site is suitable because it is within Flood zone 1 and has less than a 1 in 1000 year risk of flooding. There is limited space for SuDS onsite and an investigation is required to determine the suitability for infiltration SuDS.
Air quality Site considerations AQMA Comments The air quality objective for NO2 is exceeded on major roads in the vicinity of the site. There are residential properties along West Hill (A3), Wandsworth High Street (A3) and Broomhill Road. The nearest residential properties are around 10m from the site on Park View Court. Existing traffic issues The main traffic issue in this area is exhaust emissions from vehicles along the A3, A217, A218 and A3209 corridors. See existing traffic issues above. There is no data at likely access to the TRLN network and the nearest existing data indicates existing AQLV exceeded. The risk from additional exhaust emissions from construction HGVs is undefined at present. The risk from dust impacts at residential properties is moderate. Mitigation required and conclusions There is a need for more site specific data. There are relevant air quality sensitive receptors present along the route construction traffic is likely to take and close to the proposed construction works. Additional vehicle emissions have a high potential to interfere with local air quality action plan policies. See existing traffic issues above. Collect minimum 6 months diffusion tube data at the nearest residential receptors to the site access to the major road network. Minimise HGV movements on the local road network during the peak hours. Standard dust control measures will minimise the effect of fugitive dust on nearby sensitive receptors.
Sensitive Receptors
Existing sources of significant air pollutants Notable gaps in existing air quality monitoring
Potential issues
Summary: The site is less suitable for use as a CSO site as there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at nearby residential properties. These impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality, however this can to some extent be mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
Noise Site considerations Noise band level (from Defra noise maps) Comments Information from Defra noise maps indicates daytime noise levels of less than 58 dB LAeq and night-time noise levels of less than 50 dB LAeq at residential properties located at residential flats at Park View Court on Broomhill Road to the east/southeast of the site, which overlook the site. The residential properties facing the site are likely to experience relatively low daytime and nighttime noise levels due to them being shielded from the A218. Noise levels from the Defra noise maps provide an indication of prevailing noise levels only, and will not be employed in any detailed assessments for chosen sites. Sensitive Receptors There are sensitive receptors located to the east of the site at Park View Court, Broomhill Road. These consist of 4 storey high residential dwellings. Further residential properties are located on Broomhill Road and consist of 2 storey residential properties. There is also a primary school located to the north west of the site on Merton Road. Sensitive receptors at Park View Court are located at a distance of approximately 3m from the sites eastern boundary. Receptors at Broomhill Road to the west of the site are located approximately 20m away. The site access route is proposed to be along Broomhill Road to the A218 where there are a number of receptors and therefore there is likely to be an adverse noise impact from HGV traffic. Not applicable Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable
Noise Site considerations Existing traffic issues Comments Local road traffic, including the road traffic on the A218 to the east and the A3 to the north will contribute to the local noise climate in the area. Local road traffic, including the road traffic on the A218 to the east and the A3 to the north will contribute to the local noise climate in the area. Construction: The construction period is estimated at 2 to 3 years and working hours will be 12 hours per day (7am 7pm) Monday to Saturday. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts to any sensitive receptors in close proximity to the site. HGV movements are likely to result in adverse noise impacts on nearby sensitive receptors on Broomhill Road. The immediate site area is relatively large and, whilst the shaft location may be fixed, ancillary plant should be sited as far as is practicable from surrounding sensitive receptors. Situating plant in the northern area of the site would maximise the distance between them and the nearest sensitive receptors and minimise potential disturbance. Proposed 3m site boundary fencing will provide useful noise mitigation to some plant and construction activities however it will not provide any attenuation to higher floor levels at residential flats located at Park View Court. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated to result in an adverse impact. The nearest receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of approximately 8m and it is unlikely that vibration levels will Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable
Existing sources of significant noise emissions
Not applicable
Potential issues
Adherence to the good site practices provided in BS5228. Siting of noisy equipment and construction activities as far as is practicable from sensitive receptors. Provision of site boundary noise fences. Planning of HGV haul route so as not to pass by Dolphin House on Smugglers Way.
Noise Site considerations Comments result in minor cosmetic damage during shaft sinking but may give rise to annoyance. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a case by case basis at particular sensitive locations. Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the ventilation column and top chamber should result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Summary: The site is less suitable due to the short distances to the nearest residential properties at Park View Court and Broomhill Road. Any shielding afforded by the site perimeter barriers will be largely ineffectual due to the height of these properties. There are also anticipated to be a large number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route along Broomhill Road is likely to cause an adverse noise impact. Mitigation required and conclusions
Land quality Site location Current Site Use Grid Reference: 525342, 174491 The site is a parking area at the rear of and serving Park View Court residential properties. It includes a waste bin area for the Park View Court flats. The majority of the site is paved, with trees and hedges bordering and within the site. Topography Field Evidence of contamination (ie, visual/olfactory) Current surrounding land use (immediately adjacent to site) The site slopes slightly to the east. Possible contamination due to use as car park run off interceptors? North: Wandsworth Arts Village buildings border the north of the site. East: Park view court residential flats (3/4 storey) lie to the east. South: Park view court residential flats (3/4 storey) also lie to the south of the site the flats run from SW to NE, as does the proposed site boundary. West: Broomhill road borders the west of the site, beyond which lie residential two storey houses. Geological and hydrogeological Information Geological Strata
1
Superficial Geology and Made Ground (8m) London Clay (53m) Lambeth Group (16m) Thanet sand (11m)
Underlying Aquifer Classes
Non-Aquifer: London Clay Minor Aquifer: River Terrace Deposits, Lambeth Group, Thanet Sands, Harwich Formation Major Aquifer: Chalk
Groundwater Vulnerability/Soil Classification (High/Intermediate/Low/Not 2 Applicable) Source Protection Zone Details Surface Water Receptor
River Terrace Deposits - Minor Aquifer High Leaching Potential of Soils (U)
2
Not located in a Source Protection Zone Lake (105m southeast)
Relevant Information within a 250m radius of the site Historical Potentially Contaminating Activities (based on mapping data) Onsite Trees to the west/field to the east, 1862-1895 Open land, 1896-1920 Territorial Army Building is located on the centre of the site, a small part of a building associated with an Electrical Works encroaches the southeast corner of the site, 1947-1996 Hardstanding/residents car park, present
Land quality Offsite Factory or works, use not specified, (adjacent northern boundary), 1989- present Gas mantle factory/plant, (5m north), 1920-1949 Potential tanks in northern direction contents not specified (closest located 15m north), 1907 Electrical and Radio works, (35m north), 1951-1994 Oil storage, (65m northeast), 1907 Numerous tanks in eastern direction - contents not specified (closest located 95m northeast), 1951-1964 Reservoir infilled, (115m east), 1949 Numerous electricity sub-stations in eastern direction, (closest located 115m east), 1951 Sewage pipe, (165m south), 1920-1949 Factory or works, use not specified, (190m east), 1899-1948 Engineering works/garage (200m north), 1951-1994 Cemetery, (210m east), 1899-present Mill, listed as flour mill 1868 (215m southeast), 1868 1951 Brewing and malting, (220m northeast), 1989-present River Wandle infilled, (closest location 230m southeast), 1949 Pollution Incidents to controlled waters Two incidents: Oils, unknown, minor incident (180m east) Chemicals, unknown, minor incident (220m north) Landfill Sites Other Waste Sites Registered Radioactive Substances Fuel Stations/Depots Contemporary Trade Directory Entries None None None None Thirty-one: Record, Tape and CD Manufacturers and Wholesalers, inactive (56m north) Cleaning Materials and Equipment, active (56m north) Domestic Appliances Servicing, Repairs and Parts, inactive (56m north) Screen Process Printers, inactive (71m northwest) Tableware, inactive (80m north) Precision Engineers, inactive (98m west) Commercial Cleaning Services, active (98m west) Printers, active (98m west) Soft Drinks Manufacturers, active (98m west) Cleaning Services Domestic, inactive (99m west) Textile Printers, inactive (99m west) Printers, inactive (100m southwest) Hi-Fi Equipment Manufacturers and Distributors, active
Land quality (101m southwest) Dry Cleaners, active (104m north) Toiletries, inactive (125m northeast) Furniture Reproduction, active (131m west) Fibre Optics, inactive (131m west) Office Furniture and Equipment, inactive (136m northwest) Printers, inactive (152m west) Electronic Engineers, inactive (155m north) Commercial Cleaning Services, inactive (156m west) Glass Products Manufacturers, inactive (156m west) Jewellery Manufacturers and Repairers, inactive (160m north) Leather Garments and Products, active (167m west) Car Dealers, active (167m northwest) Dry Cleaners, inactive (167m northwest) Car Dealers, inactive (174m north) Photographic Processors, active (175m northeast) Gas Suppliers, inactive (177m northwest) Fireplaces and Mantelpieces, inactive (199m west) Lighting Manufacturers, active (202m east) Site Classification Based on Above Information Activity Potential Site Contaminants derived from surface sources (e.g. contaminants in made ground) 1) Some potential for made ground from potential filling operations during development 2) Factory/works Distance and Direction to Site 1) Onsite and directly adjacent to site Contaminants 1) Metals, PAHs, TPH
2) Onsite and directly adjacent to site 1) 5m north
2) Metals, TPH, PAHs
Potential Site Contaminants derived from offsite sources and transported to site
1) Gas mantle factory
1) Metals, PAHs, TPH, Phenols, Sulphate, Cyanide 2) TPH, Solvents, Metals 3) Metals, TPH, PAHs, PCBs
2) Potential tanks
2) Closest located 15m north 3) 35m north
3) Electrical & radio works Potential Contamination Pathways to Site (Conceptual Site Model)
3
Source 1: A1, A2, A3, B4 Source 2: E1, F7 Category 2 Assessed as Medium Risk
Contamination Category
Land quality Summary: The site is less suitable based on the moderate potential for contamination of the site to have occurred, specifically from the works and gas mantle operations historically undertaken in the vicinity of the site, and the potential presence of storage tanks in the vicinity of the site. This poses a risk to construction workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact and inhalation exposure pathways. Notes: 1. From BGS Geological Model giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. 2. Soil information for urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere in the country. Therefore a worst case vulnerability (H) is assumed until proven otherwise. 3. Refer to schematic Conceptual Site Model for explanation of site-specific source-pathwayreceptors.
Contacts
For information about the Thames Tideway Tunnel Call: 0800 0721 086 Lines are open 24 hours a day Visit: www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk Email: info@tidewaytunnels.co.uk For our language interpretation service call 0800 0721 086
For information in Braille or large print call 0800 0721 086

For information about acceptance of our application and the examination process please contact the Planning Inspectorate. Call: 0303 444 5000 Visit: http://infrastructure.planningportal.gov.uk

100 RG PNC C07BD 900001

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

100 RG PNC C07BD 900001

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Spring 2010

Site Suitability Report C07BD