Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
NATURE: The Petition for Review on Certiorari assails the Decision and Resolution of the Court of
1 2
affirmed by the Vaticans Roman Rata. The CA reversed the decision hence the appeal. ISSUE: WON Psychological Incapacity is attendant to the case. HELD: Yes, PI is attendant. The guidelines established in the Molina case is properly established in the case at bar. The SC also emphasized what fraud means as contemplated in Art 45 (3) of the FC
Appeals. The Court of Appeals had reversed the judgment3 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati declaring the marriage of Leonilo N. Antonio (petitioner) and Marie Ivonne F. Reyes (respondent), trial court. FACTS: In 1990, Leo married Marie, the latter being ten years his senior. In 1993, Leo filed to annul the marriage due to Maries Psychological Incapacity. Leo claimed that Marie persistently lied about herself, the people around her, her occupation, income, educational attainment and other events or things. She would claim that she is a psychologist but she is not. Shed claim she is a singer with the company Blackgold and that she is the latters number 1 money maker but shes not. Shed also spend lavishly as opposed to her monthly income. She fabricates things and people only to serve her make believe world. Leo presented an expert that proved Maries Psychological Incapacity. Marie denied all Leos allegations and also presented an expert to prove her case. The RTC ruled against Marie and annulled the marriage. The Matrimonial Tribunal of the church also annulled the marriage and was null and void. After careful consideration, we reverse and affirm instead the
behaviour which further constitutes PI. Her misrepresentations are not lies sought to vitiate Leos consent to marry her. Her misrepresentations are evidence that Marie cannot simply distinguish fiction/fantasy from reality which is so grave and it falls under the fourth guideline laid down in the Molina Case.