CIVIL PROCEDURE 2 Semester, AY 2012-2013 Prof. Victoria A.

Avena
nd

Syllabus

[Note: The cases below are either bracketed or unbracketed. When a case is not bracketed, study the pertinent facts and consequent ruling/s. When a case is bracketed, note pertinent ruling/s.] Part I. Introductory concepts Part II. Judicial Power Nature, scope 1987 Constitution defined Article VIII, sec's. 1, 5; judicial review re dec. relief 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 63, sec. 1 (as am. by SC Resol. of 2-17-98) re presidential/vice-presidential elections Art. VII.4 re martial law/suspension of writ of habeas corpus Art.VII.18 statutory base of judicial review Civil Code, Art. 7 judicial legislation Civil Code, Arts. 8 & 9 Constitutional protections re constitutional status Art. VIII, sec. 2; Rule 56.3 re statutory increase of appellate jurisdiction Art. VI.30 PART III. Prescribed Jurisdiction i.e., over subject matter, by law Sindico v Diaz (G.R. No. 147444, October 1, 2004) kinds general/limited or special original/appellate exclusive/concurrent or confluent territorial definition/distinguished from exercise distinguished from venue Manila Railroad v Atty.-General (20 Phil 523) 1

general rule = jurisdiction cannot be waived; judgment without jurisdiction void Rule 9, sec. 1 Abbain v. Chua (22 SCRA 748) -- jurisdiction by estoppel = exception SEAFDEC v. NLRC (206 SCRA 283) Soliven v. Fastforms Phils. (G.R. No. 139031, October 18, 2004) cannot be the subject of compromise Civil Code, Art. 2035 retroactivity R.A. 7691, sec. 7 adherence of jurisdiction - once attached, not ousted by subsequent statute unless so provided Southern Food v. Salas (206 SCRA 333)

PART IV. Acquired jurisdiction A. Over the person of the plaintiff Manila Railroad v. Atty.-General (supra; see above) of the defendant 1) by service of summons Rule 14, secs. 1, 2, & 3 personal service sec. 6 substituted service sec. 7 service by publication sec. 14 extra-territorial service sec. 15 2) by voluntary appearance Rule 14, sec. 20 Boticano v. Chu (148 SCRA 541) 3) by voluntary submission Rodriguez v. Alikpala (57 SCRA 455) B. Over the res Rule 14, sec. 15 Banco-Espaol-Filipino v. Palanca (37 Phil. 921) De Midgely v. Ferandos (64 SCRA 23) C. Over the issues Rule 18, sec. 7 Rule 10, sec. 5 Gonzaga v. CA (G.R. No. 142037, October 18, 2004) PART V. Specific Jurisdiction of Courts A. Supreme Court 1987 Constitution 2

Art. VIII, sec. 1, 2, 5 (supra Part II) Art. IX, A, sec. 7 B.P. 129, sec. 9 (as amended by R. A. 7902); Rule 43 -- question of law Urbano v. Chavez (183 SCRA 347) Ortigas v. CA (106 SCRA 121) Josefa v. Zhandong Trading Corp. (G.R. No. 150903, December 8, 2003) -- change of venue People v. Sola (103 SCRA 393) P.D. 1606, sec. 7, as am. by R.A. 7975 and R.A. 8249 B. Court of Appeals B.P. 129, sec. 9 (as amended by R.A. 7902) [supra] 1987 Cons't., Art. VIII.5.e Rule 43.1, .2 P.D. 442, as am. By R.A. 6715 St. Martin Funeral Home v. NLRC (G.R. No. 130866, Sept 16, 1998) SC Resol. A.M. No. 99-2-01 (dismissal for non-compliance w/ St. Martins case) SC A.M. 7-7-12 (December 4, 2007) C. Regional Trial Courts B.P. 129 (as am. By R.A. 7691) -- in ordinary civil actions sec. 19; R.A. 7691, secs. 1, 5 -- in special civil actions and the special proceeding of habeas corpus sec. 21 -- exclusive appellate jurisdiction sec. 22 -- special jurisdiction sec. 23; Rule 1, sec. 4; Rule 143 -- SC Admin. Circular 09-94 (June 14, 1994); R.A. 7691 -- SC Cir. No. 11-99 (transfer to RTC from MTC of cases w/in jurisdiction of family courts under R.A. 8369 (Family Courts Act of 1997) -- CB v. CA (208 SCRA 652) [read specially pp. 654-656; 661-665; 673, last par. 677, par. after quote; 679-683] Home Guaranty v. R-II Builders (G.R. No. 192649, June 22, 2011) Ascue v. CA (G.R. No. 84330, May 8, 1991) Baito v. Sarmiento (109 Phil. 148) Matling Industrial v. Coros (G.R. No. 157802, October 13, 2010) University of Sto. Tomas v. Sanchez (G.R. No. 165569, July 29, 2010) Rule 47 D. Metropolitan, Municipal, Municipal Circuit Trial Courts 3

Rule 5, sec. 2 B.P. 129, secs. 28, 29, 30, 31, as am. By R.A. 7691; A.O. 33; P.D. 537 A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC (October 1, 2008) - exclusive original jurisdiction - in civil and estate settlement proceedings/over provisional remedies - B.P. 129, sec. 33 (1); R.A. 7691, secs. 3 & 5 - SC Admin. Circular 09-94 (June 4, 1994) - in forcible entry and unlawful detainer cases - B.P. 129, sec. 33 (2); R.A. 7691, sec. 3 Lim Kieh Tong v. CA (G.R. No. 93451, March 18, 1991) - in civil actions involving title to or possession of real property - B.P. 129, sec. 33 (3) as am.; R.A. 7691, sec. 3 BF Citiland Corporation v. Otake (G.R. No. 173351, July 29, 2010) Russel v. Vestil (304 SCRA 738) - delegated jurisdiction B.P. 129, sec. 34; R.A. 7691, sec. 4; SC Circular 38-97 special jurisdiction B.P. 129, sec. 35 summary procedure in special cases B.P. 129, sec. 36 E. Special Courts Sandiganbayan (Article XIII.5; P.D. 1486) Shari'a District Courts (P.D. 1083), Shari'a Appellate Courts (R.A. 6734) [Tomawis v. Balindong, G.R. No. 182434, March 5, 2010] [Republic v. Asuncion, G.R. No. 108208, March 11, 1994, 231 SCRA 211] Family Courts (R.A. 8369) Special Agrarian Courts (R.A. 6657) [Land Bank v. Villegas (G.R. No. 180891, March 26, 2010] Special Commercial Courts (R.A. 8799.5.2) [STRADEC v. SIDC, G.R. No. 187872, November 17, 2010] National Commission on Indigenous People [City Government of Baguio City v. Masweng (G.R. No. 180206, February 4, 2009)] F. Special Rules Manufacturers Distributors v. Yu Siu Liong (11 SCRA 680) Cruz v. Tan (87 Phil. 627) Lapitan v. Scandia (24 SCRA 477) Good Development v. Tutaan (73 SCRA 189)

Part VI. 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure A. Scope and Construction Rule 1, secs. 2, 3, 4, 6 B. Uniform procedure Rule 5, sec. 1 C. Actions Kinds Rule 1, sec. 3 Nature real/personal/mixed Hernandez v. Rural Bank of Lucena (81 SCRA 75) in personam/ in rem/ quasi in rem De Midgely v. Ferandos (64 SCRA 23; supra, Part IV, B) Rule 1, sec. 5 commencement; Rule 14, sec. 1 CB v. CA (supra, Part V, C. [emphasis on pp. 682-683] Philippine First Insurance Co., Inc., et al. v. Pyramid Logistics and Trucking Corporation (G.R. No. 16514, July 9, 2008) Go v. Tong (G.R. No. 151942, November 27, 2003) Metropolitan Bank and Trust Co. v. Perez (G.R. No. 181842, February 5, 2010) Rule 2 cause of action sec. 1 basis sec. 2 definition Felipe v. Leuterio (91 Phil. 482) Santiago v. Bautista ( 32 SCRA 188) Sagrada Orden de Precadores del Santisimo Rosario de Filipinas v. National Coconut Corporation (92 Phil. 503) Ma-ao Sugar Central v. Barrios (79 Phil. 666) Danfoss v. Continental Cement (G.R. No. 143788, Sep. 9, 2005) Bayan Muna v. Romulo (G.R. No. 159618, February 1, 2011) Sec. of National Defense v. Manalo (G.R. No. 180906, October 7, 2008) sec. 3 one suit for a single cause of action sec. 4 effect of splitting Rule 16, sec. 1 (e), (f) sec. 5 joinder of causes of action Rule 3, sec. 6 Rule 3.13 5

Rule 8.2 B.P. 129.33.1 sec. 6 misjoinder D. Parties Rule 3 requisites sec. 1 who may be parties; Rule 3.15 Juasing Hardware v. Mendoza (115 SCRA 783) sec. 2 parties in interest; Rule 16.1.g Carillo v. Dabon (G.R. No. 121165, Sep. 26, 2006) Joya v. PCGG (225 SCRA 568) Mioza v. Lopez (G.R. No. 170914, April 13, 2011) Ablaza v. Republic (G.R. No. 158298, August 11, 2010) Bayan Muna v. Romulo (G.R. No. 159618, February 1, 2011; supra) Oposa v. Factoran (224 SCRA 792) kinds sec. 3 representatives sec. 4 spouses E.O. 209 (Family Code) Arts. 145, 111 sec. 5 minor or incompetent R.A. 6809 sec.'s 1 (re E.O. 209, art's. 234 & 236), 4 & 5 E.O. 209 Art. 5 sec. 6 permissive joinder Flores v. Mallare-Phillips (144 SCRA 377) sec. 8 necessary party Wee v. De Castro (G.R. No. 176405, August 20, 2008) sec. 9 non-joinder to be pleaded sec. 13 alternative defendants sec. 7 compulsory joinder of indispensable parties Wee v. De Castro (G.R. No. 176405, August 20, 2008) Arcelona v. CA (G.R. No. 102900, Oct. 2, 1997) Cerezo v. Tuazon (G.R. No. 141538, March 23, 2004) Quiombing v. CA (G.R. 93010, August 30, 1990) Orbeta v. Sendiong (G.R. No. 155236, July 8, 2005) Chua v. Beltran (G.R. No. 151900, August 30, 2005) [Limos v. Odones (G.R. No. 186979, August 11, 2010)] [Manalo v. Robles Transportation Company (G.R. No. L-8171, August 16, 1956)] sec. 10 unwilling co-plaintiff 6

sec. 12 class suit Newsweek v. IAC (142 SCRA 171) Manila Intl. Airport Authority v. Rivera Village (G.R. No. 143870, Sep. 30, 2005) Re: Request of the Heirs of the Passengers of Doa Paz (A.M. No. 88-1-6460, March 3, 1988) [Filipinas Port Services, Inc. v. Go (G.R. No. 161886, March 16, 2007] [Reyes v. Regional Trial Court of Makati, et al., G.R. No. G.R. No. 165744, August 11, 2008)] sec. 14 unknown name or identity sec. 15 defendants w/o juridical personality sec. 21 indigent party sec. 22 when Solicitor General required to be party effects sec. 11 misjoinder and non-joinder Chua v. Beltran (G.R. No. 151900, August 30, 2005) sec. 18 incompetency/ incapacity sec. 16 death Cruz v. Cruz (G.R. No. 173292, September 1, 2010) sec. 17 death/ separation of public officer-party Gojo v. Goyala (35 SCRA 557) sec. 19 transfer of interest [Heirs of Medrano v. De Vera (G.R. No. 165770, August 9, 2010)] sec. 20 re contractual money claim Del Castillo v. Jaymalin (G.R. No. L-28256, March 17, 1982) [Carabeo v. Spouses Dingco (G.R. No. 190823, April 4, 2011)] E. Venue Rule 4 People v. Sola (supra, Part V, A) Time, Inc. v. Reyes (39 SCRA 303) Pilipino Telephone v. Tecson (G.R. No. 156966, May 7, 2004) Marcos-Araneta v. CA (G.R. No. 154096, August 22, 2008) [Dacoycoy v. Intermediate Appellate Court (G.R. No. 74854, April 2, 1991)] [Board of Trustees of GSIS v. Velasco, et. al. (G.R. No. 170463, February 2, 2011)] [Navida et. al. v. Dizon (G.R. No. 125078, May 30, 2011)] F. Pleadings 7

1. In general Rule 6 kinds of pleadings sec. 1 pleadings defined sec. 2 pleadings allowed Rule 8 manner of making allegations in pleadings sec. 1 form in general sec. 7 actionable document Rule 8.1 2. The claim Rule 6 sec. 2 where asserted Rule 8.2 sec. 3 complaint sec. 6 counterclaim sec. 8 cross-claim sec. 9 counter-counterclaim and counter-cross-claim sec. 10, par. 2 reply Rule 11 when to file responsive pleadings sec. 9 counterclaim/ cross-claim after answer Namarco v. Federacion (49 SCRA 238) Rule 6, sec. 12 bringing in new parties; Rule 1.5 Rule 10, sec. 6 amended and supplemental pleadings Young v Sy (G.R. No. 157745, Sep. 26, 2006) Rule 6, sec. 11 third-party complaint, etc. Republic v. Central Surety (26 SCRA 741) Asian Construction v CA (G.R. No. 160242, May 17, 2005) Pentacapital v. Mahinay (G.R. No. 171736, 181482, July 5, 2010) Rule 16, sec. 6, par. 2 counterclaim where claim dismissed thru defendant's motion to dismiss Rule 17, sec. 2, 3 dismissal of actions 3A Apparel v. Metropolitan Bank (G.R. No. 186175, August 25, 2010) Compulsory counterclaim/ cross-claim Rule 6, sec. 7 compulsory counterclaim Meliton v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 101883, December 11, 1992) 8

Gojo v. Goyala (35 SCRA 557; supra) Namarco v. Federacion (49 SCRA 238; supra) GSIS v. Caballero (G.R. No. 158090, October 4, 2010) Calo v. Ajax (22 SCRA 996) Rule 11, sec. 8 existing compulsory counterclaim/ cross-claim Rule 9, sec. 2 barred if not set up Chavez v. Sandiganbayan (193 SCRA 282) Cojuangco v. Villegas (G.R. 76838, April 17, 1990, 184 SCRA 374) Chan v. CA (G.R. No. 109020) Mar. 3, 1994) 3. The answer Rule 6 sec. 2 pleadings allowed sec. 4 answer sec. 13 answer to third-party complaint, etc. sec. 5 defenses Gojo v. Goyala (supra) Rule 16, sec. 6 grounds for dismissal as affirmative defenses Rule 8 sec. 10 specific denial sec. 11 allegations deemed admitted Tec Bi v. Chartered Bank of India (41 Phil. 596) Phil. Advertising v. Revilla (52 SCRA 246) Liam Law v. Olympic Sawmill (129 SCRA 439) CB Circular 905 sec. 7 based on document sec. 8 how to contest document Phil. Banking Corp. v. CA (G.R. No. 133710, Jan 13, 2004) sec. 2 alternative defenses; Rule 3.13 Rule 9, sec. 1 defense/ objection waived Katon v. Palanca (G.R. No. 151149, Sep. 7, 2004) [Valientes v. Ramas (G.R. No. 157852, December 15, 2010)] [Rumarate v. Hernandez (G.R. No. 168222, April 18, 2006)] [Alicer v. Compas, et al. (G.R. No. 187720, May 30, 2011)] 4. The reply

Rule 6 secs. 2 and 10 5. Common Provisions a) re parts of pleading Rule 7 Rule 7.2(c) Baguioro v. Barrios (G.R. No. L-277, Aug. 30, 1946) [Morales v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 112140, June 23, 2005)] Rule 7.3 Bar Matter No. 1922 Bar Matter No. 287 (September 26, 2000) Bar Matter No. 1132 Wee v. Galvez (G.R. No. 147394, Aug. 11, 2004)

Rule 7.4; Rule 7.5; SC Circular No. 48-2000 Garcia v. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 165835, June 22, 2005) Disini v. SB (G.R. No. 175730, July 5, 2010) Benguet v. CA (GR No. 153571, September 18, 2003) Palma v. Galvez (G.R. No. 165273, March 10, 2010) Cruz-Agana v. Hon. Santiago Lagman (G.R. No. 139018, Apr. 11, 2005) Wee v. Galvez (G.R. No. 147394, Aug. 11, 2004) [Chua v. Beltran (G.R. No. 151900, August 30, 2005); supra, Rule 3.11] [Ali-Bondagjy v. Artadi (G.R. No. 170406, August 11, 2008)] [Asia United Bank, et. al. v. Goodland Company, Inc. (G.R. No. 190231, December 8, 2010)] [Paradero v. Abragan (G.R. No. 158917, March 1, 2004)] [Hasegawa v. Kitamura (G.R. No. 149177, November 23, 2007)] [Mid-Pasig Land Development Corporation v. Tablante (G.R. No. 162924, February 4, 2010)] [BPI v. CA (G.R. No. 168313, October 6, 2010)] [Vallacar Transit, Inc. v. Catubig (G.R. No. 175512, May 30, 2011)] [Disini v. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 175730, July 5, 2010)] b) re manner of making allegations Rule 8 except secs. 2, 7, 8, 10 and 10

11 (supra) Perpetual Savings v. Fajardo (223 SCRA 720) Wee v. Galvez (supra) c) re effect of failure to plead Rule 9; Rule 30.9 Cerezo v. Tuazon (supra) Sps. Delos Santos v. RTC (G.R. No.153696, Sep. 11, 2006) d) striking out pleadings Rule 8, sec. 12 6. Amended/ supplemental pleadings Rule 10; Rule 1.5 Juasing Hardware v. Mendoza (115 SCRA 178; supra) Dauden-Hernaez v. de los Angeles (27 SCRA 1276) Phil. Export v. Phil. Infrastructures (G.R. No. 120384, Jan 13, 2004) Surigao Mining v. Harris (69 Phil. 113) [Bormaheco v. Malayan (G.R. No. 156599, July 26, 2010)] 7. When to file responsive pleadings Rule 11 8. Filing/Service of Pleadings, Judgments and Other Papers Rule 13 Rule 13.3 icow Rule 51.9 SC Resolution of February 17, 1998 Bautista v. Maya-Maya (G.R. 148361, Nov. 29, 2005) GCP-Manny v. Principe (G.R. 141484, Nov. 11, 2005) Marinduque Mining and Industrial Corporation and Industrial Enterprises, Inc. v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 161219, October 6, 2008) Camper Realty v. Pajo-Reyes (G.R. No. 179543, October 6, 2010) [GSIS v. NLRC (G.R. No. 180045, November 17, 2010)] 9. Computation of Time Rule 22 A.M. No. 00-2-14-SC Luz v. National Amnesty Commission (G.R. No. 159708, Sep. 24, 2004) 10. Bill of Particulars Rule 12 G. Summons Rule 14 contents, when issued, by whom issued secs. 2, 1, 3, 5 modes of service 11

1. service in person sec. 6 Toyota Cubao v. CA (G.R. No. 126321, Oct. 23, 1997) 2. substituted service sec. 7 Gentle Supreme v. Consulta (G.R. No. 183182, September 1, 2010) Andy Quelnan v. VHF Phil. (G.R. No. 138500, Sep. 16, 2005) Robinson v. Miralles (G.R. No. 163584, December 12, 2006) Palma v. Galvez (supra) Afdal v. Carlos (G.R. No. 173379, December 1, 2010) 3. extra-territorial service sec. 15 Dial Corp. v. Soriano (161 SCRA 737) Montalban v. Maximo (22 SCRA 1070) De Midgley v. Ferandos (supra) Sahagun v. CA (G.R. No. 78328, June 3, 1991) Romualdez-Licaros v. Licaros (G.R. No. 150656, April 29, 2003) R.A. 4883; P.D. 1079 4. by publication secs. 14, 15, 16 mode of service upon certain defendants 1. upon domestic private juridical entity sec. 11 Paluwagan ng Bayan v. King (172 SCRA 62) Dole Philippines, Inc. vs. Hon. Reinato G. Quilala, (G.R. No. 168723 July 9, 2008) 2. upon foreign private juridical entity sec. 12; sec. 12; SC A.M. No. 11-3-6-SC (New Rule on Service of Summons on Foreign Private Juridical Entity) Facilities Management v. De la Osa (89 SCRA 131) 3. upon resident temporarily abroad sec. 16 Montalban v. Maximo (supra) Palma v. Galvez (supra) 4. upon defendant whose identity/ whereabouts unknown sec. 14 Baltazar v. CA (168 SCRA 354) leave of court sec. 17 12

5. upon others secs. 8, 9, 10, 13 voluntary appearance sec. 20; Rule 16.1.a voluntary submission Rodriguez v. Alikpala ( supra) -- return/proof of service secs. 4, 18, 19 H. Motions in general Rule 15 City of Dumaguete v. Philippine Ports Authority (G.R. No. 168973, August 24, 2011) [Bacelonia v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 143440, February 11, 2003)] [Philippine National Railways v. Rustia (G.R. No. 153721, September 15, 2006)] I. Motion to Dismiss under Rule 16 U.S. v Ruiz (136 SCRA 487); SEAFDEC v. NLRC (supra, Part III) Rule 2.2, 2.4 Rule 9, sec. 1 Rule 6, sec. 5 (b) Rule 7, sec. 5 Rule 39, sec.47 Section 133, B.P. 68 R16.1 Philville v. Javier (G.R. No.147738, Dec. 13, 2005) Carillo v. Dabon (G.R. No. 121165, Sep. 26, 2006; supra); Arcelona v. CA (G.R. No. 102900, Oct. 2, 1997; supra) [Universal Robina Corporation v. Lim (G.R. No. 154338, October 5, 2007)] Perkin Elmer Singapore Pte Ltd. v. Dakila Trading Corporation (G.R. No. 172242, August 14, 2007; supra) Global Business v. Surecomp Software (G.R. No. 173463, October 13, 2010) Allied Agri-Business Development Company v. CA (G.R. No. 118438, December 4, 1998) Lee Bun Ting v. Aligaen (76 SCRA 178) Villarino v. Avila (G.R. No.131191, Sep. 26, 2006) Lacap v. Lee (G.R. No. 142131, December 11, 2002) Santos v. National Statistics Office (G.R. No. 171129, April 06, 2011) [Panganiban v. Pilipinas (G.R. No. 131471, January 22, 2003)] Del Rosario v. Donato (G.R. No. 180595, March 5, 2010) 13

Santiago v. De Los Santos (61 SCRA 146) Heirs of Licaros v. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 157438, Oct. 18, 2004) Balo v. CA (G.R. No. 129704, Sep 30, 2005) Katon v. Palanca (supra, Part VI.F.3) Tancuntian v. Gempesaw (G.R. No.149097, Oct. 18, 2004) Goodyear v. Sy (G.R. 154554, Nov. 9, 2005) Malion v. Alcantara (G.R. No.141528, Oct. 31, 2006) Swagman Hotel v. CA (G.R. 161135, Apr. 8, 2005) Regala v. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No.105938, Sep. 20, 1996) [Bank of America v. Court of Appeals] (G.R. No. 120135, March 31, 2003) [Robern v. Quitain (G.R. No. 135042, September 23, 1999)] [Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. CA (G.R. 126212, Mar. 2, 2000)] [Wee v. De Castro (G.R. No. 176405, August 20, 2008; supra)] Santiago v. De Los Santos (61 SCRA 146) [Public Hearing Committee of the Laguna Lake Development Authority, et al. v. SM Prime Holdings, Inc. (G.R. No. 170599, September 22, 2010)] [Suplico v. Neda (G.R. No. 178830, July 14 2008)] R16.6 [Gochan v. Gochan (G.R. No. 146089, December 13, 2001)] J. Dismissal by claimant Rule 17 Goho v. Goyala (supra) K. Judgment on the Pleadings Rule 34; Rule 18, sec. 2; Rule 9.3 Reillo v. San Jose (G.R. No. 166393, June 18, 2009) L. Pre-trial Rule 18 SC A.M. 03-1-09-SC Jonathan Landoil Intl. v. Mangudadatu (G.R. No.155010, Aug. 16, 2004) Paredes v. Verano (G.R. No.164375, Oct 12, 2006) Agulto v. Tecson (G.R. No. 145276, November 29, 2005) [Ramos v. Sps. Alvendia, et al. (G.R. No. 176706, October 8, 2008)] M. Course of Trial 1. Trial proper Rule 30 OCA Cir. No. 39-98 SC Cir. 1-89 14

2. Kinds of trial a. consolidated/separate Rule 31 Sps. Yu v. Magno Construction (G.R. No.138701-02, October 17, 2006) Espinoza v. United Overseas Bank (G.R. No. 175380, March 22, 2010) b. trial by commissioners Rule 32; Rule 67, sec. 5; Rule 30.9 Angara v. Fedman Devt. Corp. (G.R. No.156822, Oct 18, 2004) 3. Incidents/processes a. calendar of cases Rule 20 b. intervention Rule 19; Rule 11.3 Holiday Inn v. Sandiganbayan (186 SCRA 447) Ordoez v. Gustilo (182 SCRA 469) c. subpoena Rule 21; Rule 71, sec. 3 (f) d. Rule 22 Uy v. First Metro (G.R. No.167245, Sep. 27, 2006) e. modes of discovery AM No. 03-1-09-SC (July 13, 2004) 1) deposition pending action Rule 23 Jonathan Landoil v. Mangadadatu (supra, PART VI, L) 2) interrogatories to parties Rule 25 PBP v. CA (G.R. No. 110495, January 29, 1998) 3) admission by adverse party Rule 26 Allied Agri-Business v. CA (G.R. No. 118438, December 4, 1998) 4) production/inspection of documents/things Rule 27 Yu v. CA (G.R. No. 154115, June 28, 2006) 5) physical/mental examination of persons Rule 29 -- refusal to comply with modes of discovery Rule 29 f) summary judgment Rule 35 Republic v. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 152154, July 15, 2003) Grand Farms v. CA (193 SCRA 748) Cucueco v. CA (G.R. No. 139278, October 25, 2004) Bitanga v. Pyramid Construction Engineering Corporation (G.R. No. 173526, August 28, 2008) D.M. Consunji v. Duvaz (G.R. No. 155174, August 4, 2009) [BPI v. Yu (G.R. No. 184122, January 20, 2010)] 15

g) demurrer to evidence Rule 33 Northwest Airlines G.R. No. 120334, January 20, 1998) Choa v. Choa (G.R. No. 143376, November 26, 2002) h) lis pendens Rule 13.4 Romero v. CA (G.R. No. 142406, May 16, 2005) [Sps. Pudadera v. Magallanes, G.R. No. 170073, October 18, 2010)] i) archival SC Adm. Cir. No. 7-A-92 (June 21, 1993) N. Judgments, Final Orders and Entry thereof Rule 36 Macias v. Macias (G.R. No. 149617, September 3, 2003) 1987 Constitution, Art. VIII, secs. 13 and 14; Rule 36.1; B.P. 129.38 Velarde v. SJS (G.R. No. 159357, April 28, 2004) 1. Effect of Judgment Rule 39, secs. 47 and 48 Art. 2037, Civil Code Lee Bun Ting v. Aligaen (supra, Part VI, I) Oropesa v. Allied Bank (G.R. No. 129788, December 3, 2002) Nabus v. CA (193 SCRA 732) Buan v. Lopez (145 SCRA 34) Buazon v. CA (220 SCRA 182) Ali-Bondagjy v. Artadi (G.R. No. 170406, August 11, 2008) Tumbokon v. Legaspi (G.R. No. 153736, August 4, 2010) [Sps. Antonio v. Vda. De Monje (G.R. No. 149624, September 29, 2010)] [San Diego v. CA (G.R. No. 159230, October 18, 2010)] [Chavez v. CA (G.R. No. 159411, March 18, 2005)] 2. Execution, Satisfaction of Judgments Article 1491, Civil Code Rule 39, secs. 1 to 46 SC Cir. 5-98 (January 12, 1998) SC Cir. 6-93 (February 9, 1993) SC Cir. 10-25-2000 Heirs of Divinagracia v. Ruiz (G.R. No. 165582, July 9, 2010) Villeza v. German Management (G.R. No. 182937, August 8, 2010 16

Bausa v. Heirs of Dino (G.R. No. 167281, August 28, 2008) La Campana Development v. Ledesma (G.R. No. 154152, August 25, 2010) Briones-Vasquez v. CA (G.R. No. 144882, February 4, 2005) Chinabank v. Ordinario (G.R. No. 121943, March 24, 2003) Perla Compania v. Ramolete (G.R. No. L-60887, November 13, 1991) Heirs of Pidacan v. Air Transportation Office (G.R. No. 186192, August 25, 2010 [Diesel Construction v. Jollibee (G.R. No. 136805, January 28, 2000)] [BPI v. Roxas (G.R. No. 157833, October 15, 2007)] [Villarin v. Munasque (G.R. No. 169444, September 17, 2008)] O. New Trial or Reconsideration Rule 37; Rule 40.2; Rule 41.3 Cansino v. CA (G.R. No. 125799, August 21, 2003) PAL v. Salcedo (G.R. No. L-22119, September 29, 1967) People v. Amparado (G.R. No. L-48656, December 21, 1987) Helmuth, Jr. v. People (G.R. No. 57058, March 15, 1982) People v. Del Mundo (G.R. Nos. 119964-69, September 20, 1996) Cuenca v. People (G.R. No. 109870, December 1, 1995) P. Relief from Judgments, Orders or Other Proceedings Rule 38 Cerezo v. Tuazon (supra, Part VI, D) Agan v. Nueva (G.R. No. 155018, December 11, 2003) Legarda v. CA 195 SCRA 418; G.R. No. 94457, October 16, 1997) Fukuzumi v. Sanritsu (G.R. No. 140630, August 12, 2004) Redea v. CA (G.R. No. 146611, February 6, 2007) Q. Appeal 1. From MTC to RTC Rule 40 2. From MTC to RTC to CA Rule 42 3. From RTC to CA Rule 41 SC A.M. 7-7-12 (December 4, 2007) SC Cir. 48-2000 Heirs of Poe v. Malayan (G.R. 156302, April 7, 2009) Diesel v. Jolibee (supra, above) GSIS v. Phil. Village Hotel (G.R. No. 150922, September 21, 17

2004) Fil-Estate Properties, Inc., et al. vs. Hon. Marietta J. HomenaValencia (G.R. No. 173942, June 25, 2008) Palma v. Galvez (G.R. No. 165273, March 10, 2010) 4. From QJA to CA Rule 43 CHED v. Dasig (G.R. No. 172776, December 17, 2008) 5. To SC Rule 45; Rule 64 SC A.M. No. 04-7-03-SC (July 13, 2004) SC A.M. No. 7-7-12 (December 4, 2007) SC Admin. Cir. 3-96 (February 9, 1993) Wee v. Galvez (supra, Part VI, F, 5) Maramag v. Maramag (supra, Part V, I) R. Original Actions in CA Rules 46 and 47 Lazaro v. Rural Bank (G.R. No. 139895, August 15, 2003) Tolentino v. Leviste (G.R. No. 156118, November 19, 2004) Tible & Tible Company, Inc. et al. v. Royal Savings and Loan Association (G.R. No. 155806, April 8, 2008) Almelor v. RTC Las Pinas (G.R. No. 179620, August 26, 2008) S. Procedure in CA Rule 44 and Rules 48 to 54 SC Resolution of February 17, 1998 (supra, Part VI.F.10) Cucueco v. CA (supra, Part VI, M, 3, e) T. Procedure in SC Rule 56 icow Rules 45, 48, 51.1, 51.2, 51.5-11 and 52 U. Provisional Remedies A.M. 99-2-01-SC A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC (March 15, 2003) A.M. No. 04-10-11-SC (November 15, 2004) V. Preliminary Attachment Rule 57 Mabanag v. Gallemore (G.R. No. L-825, July 20, 1948; 81 Phil. 254) 18

Cuartero v. CA (G.R. No. 102448, August 5, 1992) Foundation Specialists v. Betonval Ready Concrete (G.R. No. 170674, August 24, 2009) W. Preliminary Injunction Rule 58 SC A.M. No. 7-7-12 (December 4, 2007) SC Admin. Cir. No. 11-2000 R.A. 8975 SC Cir. 68-94 (November 3, 1994) SC Resolution of February 17, 1998 (supra, Part VI, F, 10) SC Cir. 13-93 P.D. 1818 (1989) SC Admin. Cir. 20-95 (February 12 ,1995) SC Admin. Cir. 29-2002 (July 1, 2002) SC Admin. Cir. 38-2002 (August 28, 2002) Republic v. Migrino (189 SCRA 289) International Container v. CA (214 SCRA 456); Rule 16.6 Benguet v. CA (G.R. No. 153571, September 18, 2003) Dungog v. CA (G.R. No. 139767, August 5, 2003) Traders Royal Bank v. IAC (G.R. No. 66321, October 31, 1984) China Banking Corporation v. Co (G.R. No. 174569, September 17, 2008) Lim v. BPI Agricultural Development Bank (G.R. No. 179230, March 9, 2010) X. Receivership Rule 59 Talag v. CA (189 SCRA 801) Y. Replevin Rule 60 Sapugay v. CA (G.R. No. 86792, March 21, 1990) Z. Support Pendente Lite Rule 61 VII. Special Civil Actions SC A.M. No. 99-2-04-SC A. Interpleader -- Rule 62 B. Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies Rule 63 19

SC Resolution of February 17, 1998 (supra, Part VI, F, 10) Velarde v. SJS (supra, Part VI, N, 2) PDIC v. CA (G.R. No. 126911, April 30, 2003) Ferrer v. Roco (G.R. No. 174129, July 5, 2010) C. Rule 64 SC Resolution of February 17, 1998 (supra, Part VI, F, 10) D. Certiorari 1987 Constitution, Art. VIII, sec. 1; Rule 65 SC A.M. No. 7-7-12 (December 4, 2007) SC Admin. Cir. No. 3-96 (supra, see Rule 45) SC Resolution of February 9, 1999 re A.M. No. 99-2-01-SC Tano v. Socrates (G.R. No. 110249, August 21, 1997) Calagui v. CA (G.R. No. 47518, June 18, 1990, 186 SCRA 564) Republic v. CA (G.R. No. 129846, January 18, 2000) Siena Realty Corp. v. Gal-lang (G.R. No. 145169, May 13, 2004) Tesorero v. Mathay (185 SCRA 124) Wee v. Galvez (supra, Part VI, F, 5) Dungog v. CA (supra, Part VI, U, 2) Badua v. Cordillera Bodong (G.R. No. 92649, February 14, 1991, 194 SCRA 101) Ad Hoc Fact-Finding Committee v. Desierto (G.R. No. 135703, April 15, 2009) [Republic v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 159275, August 25, 2010)] E. Prohibition Rule 65 Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS (G.R. No. 122156, February 3, 1997) Francisco v. Fernando (G.R. No. 166501, November 16, 2006) F. Mandamus Rule 65 PALEA v. PAL (G.R. No. 31396, January 30, 1982) United Housing v. Dayrit (G.R. No. 76422, January 22, 1990) Vital-Gozon v. CA (G.R. No. 101428, August 5, 1992) Municipality of Makati v. CA (G.R. No. 89898-99, October 1, 1990) Systems Plus v. Local Government (G.R. No. 14638, August 7, 2003) MMDA v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay (G.R. Nos. 171947-48, December 18, 2008) Eng v. Lee (G.R. No. 176831, January 15, 2010) G. Quo Warranto Rule 66 Moro v. Del Castillo (G.R. No. 184980, March 30, 2011) 20

[Villanueva v. Rosqueta (G.R. No. 180764, January 19, 2010)] H. Expropriation Rule 67 R.A. 8974 NAPOCOR v. CA (G.R. No. 106804, August 12, 2004) Bardillon v. Bgy. Masili (G.R. No. 146886, April 30, 2003) NPC v. Gutierrez (193 SCRA 1) Ansaldo v. Tantuico (188 SCRA 300) [Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority v. Lozada (G.R. No. 176625, February 25, 2010)] I. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage Rule 68 Rosales v. Alfonso (G.R. No. 137792, August 12, 2003) J. Partition Rule 69 K. Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer Rule70 Lacap v. Lee (G.R. No. 142131, December 11, 2002) Santos v. National Statistics Office (G.R. No. 171129, April 06, 2011) Macasaet v. Macasaet (G.R. No. 154391-92, September 30, 2004) Alcaraz v. Tangga-an (G.R. No. 128568, April 9, 2003) Laurora v. Sterling (G.R. No. 146815, April 9, 2003) Jakihaca v. Aquino (181 SCRA 67) Benitez v. CA (G.R. No. 104828, January 16, 1997) L. Contempt Rule 71 Igot v. Meralco Land Bank v. Listana (G.R. No. 152611, August 5, 2003) Regalado v. Go (G.R. No. 167988, February 6, 2007) Select Procedural Laws R.A. 7160, secs. 399-422 (Revised Katarungang Pambarangay Law) R.A. 9285 Berba v. Pablo (G.R. No.160032, Nov. 11, 2005) Pascual v. Pascual (G.R. No. 157830, Nov. 17, 2005) Select Procedural Rules A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC 25 (September 25, 2007) (Rule on the Writ of Amparo) A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC (Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data) Sec. of National Defense v. Manalo (G.R. (G.R. No. 180906, October 7, 21

2008) Tapuz v. Hon. Judge del Rosario (G.R. No. 182484, June 17, 2008) [Rubrico v. Macapagal-Arroyo (G.R. No. 183871, February 18, 2010)] [So v. Tacla, Jr., G.R. No. 190108, 190473, October 19, 2010)] 1991 Revised Rule on Summary Procedure A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC (March 15, 2003) A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC (March 15, 2003) SC Adm. Memo. No. 01-2-04 A.M. No. 04-9-07-SC A.M. No. 02-1-06-SC SC Circular 2-89 A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC, October 1, 2008 (Rule on Small Claims Cases)

22