Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
d
,
q
Transient sc time constants
d
,
q
Subtransient sc time constants
R
a
Armature resistance
L
l
Armature leakage inductance
L
0
Zero sequence inductance
! If L
af
= L
akd
= L
fkd
and L
ag
= L
akq
= L
qkq
the above measurements
are enough
! If L
af
La
kd
a new measurement, L
c
(characteristic impedance),
is needed
1
L
d
(s)
1
L
d
1
L
d
1
L
d
s
d
1 s
d
1
L
d
1
L
d
s
d
1 s
d
d0
d0
L
d
L
d
d
1
L
d
L
d
L
d
L
d
d0
d0
d
L
d
L
d
L
c
L
l
L
md
L
fkdl
L
md
L
fkdl
Direct axis basic definitions
L
L L
L L
L
L
fl
dc dc
dc dc
md
dc
1
]
1
'
'
2
L
L L
L L
L
L
kdl
dc dc
dc dc
md
dc
1
]
1
' "
' "
2
L L L
md d l
L L L
dc d c
L L L
dc d c
" "
R
L
f
fl
d
1
R
L
kd
kdl
d
2
do do
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
L
L
L
L
L
L
' "
'
'
' "
"
+ + +
1
]
1
1
1
do do d d
d
d
L
L
' " ' "
"
( ) ( )
d d d d
d
dc
do do
c
dc
L
L
L
L
1 2
+ + +
' " ' "
d d do do
dc
dc
L
L
1 2
' "
"
L L
L
L
dc dc
d d
do do
dc
dc
d
'
' "
"
+ +
1
]
1
1
1 2
2
1
( ) L L L
L
L
fkdl c l
md
dc
d-axis data conversion procedure
STANDSTILL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING
! ! Aim : Accurate identification of SM parameters from
low-voltage frequency response tests at standstill
! ! IEEE Std. 115 : Test procedures for SM
! ! Measurable parameters
* d-axis operational impedance Z
d
(s)
* q-axis operational impedance Z
q
(s)
* standstill armature to field transfer function sG(s)
* standstill armature to field impedance Z
afo
(s)
I I V
d s d s
2
3
1
3
V
I
d d
0 0 V
I
q q
0 0 V
I I V
q s q s
2
3
1
3
V
I
0 0
0 0 V I
0 0
0 0 V
STANDSTILL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING
Operating conditions I
s
= I
b
= - I
c
; I
a
= 0 ; V
s
= V
c
- V
b
d-axis q-axis
Z s
e s
i s
d
d
d
e
fd
( )
( )
( )
0
Z s Z s R sL s
d armd a d
( ) ( ) ( ) +
1
2
STANDSTILL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING
Measurement of Z
d
(s)
Z s
e s
i s
q
q
q
( )
( )
( )
Z s Z s R sL s
q armq a q
( ) ( ) ( ) +
1
2
STANDSTILL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING
Measurement of Z
q
(s)
sG s
i s
i s
fd
d
e
fd
( )
( )
( )
i s
i s
i s
i s
fd
d
fd
arm
( )
( )
( )
( )
3
2
STANDSTILL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING
Measurement of sG(s)
Z s
e s
i s
afo
fd
d
i
fd
( )
( )
( )
0
Z s
e s
i s
e s
i s
afo
fd
d
fd
arm
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
3
2
STANDSTILL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING
Measurement of Z
afo
(s)
STANDSTILL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING
Procedure for identification of d-axis parameters
! Use the best available estimate for stator leakage inductance L
R
! L
d
(0) is the low-frequency limit of L
d
(s) [L
ad
= L
d
(0) - L
R
]
! Find the field to armature turns ratio N
fd
/N
a
! Calculate the field resistance
! Define an equivalent circuit structure for the direct axis
! Use a fitting technique to find values for the unknown parameters
that produce the best fit for L
d
(s) and sG(s)
! Adjust L
ad
to its unsaturated value L
adu
! Measure the field winding resistance, convert it to the desired
operating temperature, and refer it to the stator
! Normalize the equivalent circuit elements to per unit values
STANDSTILL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING
Procedure for identification of q-axis parameters
! Use the best available estimate for stator leakage inductance L
R
! L
q
(0) is the low-frequency limit of L
q
(s) [L
aq
= L
q
(0) - L
R
]
! Define an equivalent circuit structure for the quadrature axis
! Use a fitting technique to find values for the unknown parameters
that produce the best fit for L
q
(s)
! Adjust L
aq
to its unsaturated value L
aqu
! Normalize the equivalent circuit elements to per unit values
STANDSTILL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING
! ! SSFR testing limitations
* effect of eddy current losses on R
a
* standstill measurements made at low currents
* resistance in the contact points of damper windings
! ! Fitting techniques
* Maximum-likehood estimation
* Noniterative parameter identification
* Network synthesis technique
* Vector fitting
! ! Several procedures have been proposed to solve some
limitations, see for instance
* I.M. Canay, IEEE Trans. on EC, 1993
* A. Keyhani & H. Tsai, IEEE Trans. on EC, 1994
* D.Y. Park et al., IEEE Trans. on EC, 1998
! ! Differences between round rotor and salient pole
machines (IEEE PES WM 1997 Panel & IEEE Trans. on
EC, 1999)
ON-LINE TESTING
! ! Limitations of off-line testing
! ! Time-domain and frequency-domain methods
! ! On-line tests
* on-line frequency response test
* load rejection test
* large disturbance in the excitation voltage
* small disturbance
INDUCTION MACHINE
! ! Equivalent circuit
* eddy currents in rotor bars
* leakage inductance saturation
! ! IEEE Std 112 : Standard Test Procedure for Polyphase
Induction Motors and Generators
! ! Parameter estimation tests
* on/off line tests
* standstill time-domain test
* standstill frequency response
! ! Procedure based on standard specification data
* G.J. Rogers & D. Shirmohamadi, IEEE Trans. on EC,
1987
* EMTP Universal Machine Module
INDUCTION MACHINE EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT
! ! IM performance dominated by the stator and rotor total
leakage reactances and the rotor resistance
! ! These quantities are not constant but vary with slip
* rotor resistance variation is caused by eddy currents
* leakage inductance variation is caused by eddy currents
and by magnetic saturation of the leakage flux path
Equivalent circuit - Deep bar or double
cage rotor winding
EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT
SIMPLIFIED EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT
MODIFIED EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT
Standard Specification Data Equivalent circuit parameters
Rated voltage, V
red
Full load specification
* Efficiency,
* Power factor, cos
* Slip, s
Starting specification
* Current, I
st
* Torque, T
st
Maximum torque, T
max
Design ratio, m
Stator resistance, R
s
Stator leakage reactance, X
s
Magnetizing reactance, X
m
Rotor leakage reactance, X
r
Rotor primary resistance, R
1
Rotor secundary resistance, R
2
Rotor secondary leakage reactance, X
2
DATA CONVERSION PROCEDURE
( ) T r I
T
T
T
T s
s
m
r r
x
DF I I
DF I I
I
I
x x DF x
st st st
rat
st st s
sat
sat
sat
tl to ts
+
<
+
1
]
1
>
_
,
2
1 2
2
1
1
1
2 2
2
( )
cos
sin( )
sin
Full load specifications
r
s
r
s
s
x
s
s r
m
cos
( ) cos
( ) sin
' '
'
1
1 1
1
Starting specifications Basic relationships
r r T
I
I s
r r m r m r
r r
r r
x
r r
m
x
V
I
r r V pu
x
V
I
r r
x
x x
DF DF
x
x DF x DF
DF
st r rat
s
st
st r
r
r
tls
s
st
s st s
tl
red
red
s st
ts
tl tls
s
to
tls tl s
_
,
_
,
+
_
,
+
2
2
1
2 2
2
1
1
2
1 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
1
1
cos
( )
( )
( )
2
1
2
2
2 1
2
+
DF
x
x
x x r
r
r
m
m
x x
x
s
so
to
ro so r
ss rs
ts
CONCLUSIONS
! ! A significant activity has been made during the last 20
years to deduce rotating machine parameters from
test measurements
! ! Only machine models for low frequency and switching
transients have been analyzed, in all cases considering
a terminal machine model
! ! EMTP users can take advantage of different conversion
procedures to obtain the machine parameters for the
most adequate model
! ! However, very few data conversion procedures are
currently implemented in transients tools