IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE FAMILY .COURT: HYDERABAD, A.P. DATED:Monday, the 24th day of March, 2008.

Present: Sri B.RAPHAKRISHNAIAH;B.A., Judge, Family, Court, Hyderabad. B.L.,

I.A.NO.1092 OF 2007

iN
O.P~No.292 of 2007

M. Kavltha, W/o. C.Hari Kishan Reddy, Agedabout 31.years, Occ:.Sof~~f:lre (~()nsultant, R/o.H.No.3-4-355, Flat No.303, Ganesh Towers, Ungampally, Hyderabad.

Petitioner.

C.,Harikishan Reddy, f,/o .. C:;lVenk~t.Reddy, Age 36 years, Occ: Software Consultant, R/o.Plot No.61, Sriramnagf:lr,Karm~nghat, Hyderabad. . This petition is coming on this day i.e., 24.3.2008 before me for final hearing in the presence of both parties, this Court delivered thefollowing:

bearing Plot No.61, Sriram Nag~r,Karmcmghat,.Hydera~adand rents and he got profits from all other businesses

heJs getting

to the tune of Rs.1 lakh

arrival of petitioner and respondent to Hyderabad"from'U.S:A,'respondent has remitted about Rs.16 lakhs'to his parents'landheis also having vast

>.,

..

Rs.30,OOOIper month as interimmaintenance:

petitioner is having resiqential/,flaf,bearingN0.402,

Hi line Apartment,

Ungampally, Kachiguda, Hyderabadand petitioner is deriving rent from the said flat. The residential house isin the name of respondent's father and it is his self acquired property.. Respondent's famityH( having

30 acres of
and

land in Mahaboobnagar District, which isancesfralproperfy

respondent is only a joint owner. Due to scarcity of water, no agricultural activity is going on in the saicfland. PetitioQerisaqualifiecfsoftware
>

consultant and according to her she worked as computer programrner in U.S.A and earne<:i more money than petitioner. In the said circumstances, the petitionmaybedi~rnissed and petitioner is not entitled to any interim

the Xerox copies of passports of both parties marked. Submissions heard and this I.Ais posted

to 24.3.2008for orders.

Whetherthepetiti()ner is entitled to interim maintenance? If so, to what amount?

6. POINT:

It is important to n6te<in the affidavit filed by petitioner in

and resident of H.No.3-4-355,Flat NO.303,Ganesh towers, Lingampally, Hyderabad. In her affidavit,shf).didnot state whether she is taking shelter in the house of her parents, which is the residential address given by her or she is living alone, it so in wbat capacity, whether the said flat No.303, Ganesh Towers, LingampallY,J-Iyderabad is her own flat or if she is residing in the said house as .. aJenant and What is the rent she is paying. She did not disclose whatJ?the income. she .. is deriving as software

consultant as described by her in her affidavit. It is not her case that the respondent is also engaged in employment in India. Except her statement

not entitled to any interim maintenance and this petition is liable to be dismissed. The point is answeredaccordi~" .;;'". holding that as of income,vvhich any inte~im

IN THE RESULT, this petitj'6:ri:;idr~~S:d petitioner is Software Consultant and as,~ ~~wrce is not disclosed to the Court, she

~!,;.'.p..2!,.~~ntitl~cl to
".'if'

maintenanceDictatedto Personal Assistant, transcribed by him, correct~d and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 24th day of Marcp,
2008.

!3 t/I'lfl"-

, . t-li. l.."'-. .. ,,

,,-, ../'l

~'.'

"

JUDGE .... 'IV, FAMILY COURT: HYDERABA,g

.~ 1ii1{lll':

.'. :'1'jiIi''''

APPJ;~Dli5,OFE"'I[)E",9E WITNESSES.EXAMINED

: EXHIBITS MARKEOJ=ORTAEPET1TIONER:
Ex.P1 : Xerox copy of pass port'OfpetitiOnet. Ex.P2.:Xerox copyofp"ss port .. qf;rJ1~pondent.. Ex.P3: Xerox copy of Biodata oftespondent. : EXHIBITS MARKED FOR THE RESPONDENT: Nil

8#21/
JUD~E FAMILY COURT: HYDERABAD