Design Project 499: PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

Group being assessed: ____________________________________________________

Please give a rating, from 0 to 10, for each of the aspects of the presentation as given below:
Content and organisation of material Poor (04) Some required content is missing No discernable structure; confusing presentation No emphasis of the main issues or relationships between them Significant technical inaccuracies Fair (5) Presentation covers all content areas, but some aspects are over / under emphasised Easy to follow the work presented Main points are emphasised, but no clear relationship between them Accurate content, but insufficient development of ideas Decisions are presented and supported by valid arguments Good (67) Presentation covers all content areas with appropriate balance Information presented in logical, thoughtful sequence Main points well addressed, with clear relationships between main ideas; good summary presented Technical content is accurate Decisions are presented with discussion of alternatives, and are supported by valid arguments Very good body language, eye contact and audience rapport Well-paced delivery with good use of tone and pauses Speaker is easy to understand and loud enough for everyone to hear No spelling mistakes; clear, concise language Consistent, professional formatting Tables, diagrams and graphs are appropriate and clear Can answer all questions and elaborates on some All group members are present; each person either presented, or answered one question 16-18 or 20-22 mins (5 marks) Very good (810) Presentation covers all content areas with appropriate balance Information is highly structured, facilitating easy understanding Key points are well addressed presented, relationships are explained and implications discussed and summarised Technical content accurate and significant All decisions are presented in context and with discussion of alternatives Clear, valid methodology is given and decisions are supported by convincing arguments Excellent body language, eye contact and audience rapport Well-paced, engaging, polished delivery Speaker is easy to understand and loud enough for everyone to hear Rating

Date: _______________

Decision methodology Spoken delivery

Results of decisions are presented, but without justification Reads directly from notes, no eye contact, little audience rapport Uneven pace of delivery Incorrectly pronounces words; is difficult to understand Too quiet: many people cant hear Slides contain spelling mistakes Inconsistent formatting Tables, diagrams and graphs are unclear Cannot understand or answer questions One or more group members are missing

Quality of visuals

Answering questions Group participation Timing (min:s) ____ : ____

Good body language, eye contact and audience rapport Well-paced delivery Incorrectly pronounces some words, but is understandable Speakers voice does not carry to entire audience No spelling mistakes, but language used is unclear or wordy in places Formatting is consistent, but some slides are difficult to read Tables, diagrams and graphs are clear Can answer most questions, but fails to elaborate All group members are present, but some dont participate

No spelling mistakes; clear, concise language Consistent, professional, appealing format Tables, diagrams and graphs are appropriate, clear and well integrated into the presentation Animation or other effects used, if appropriate Clearly answers and elaborates on all questions All group members are present; each person either presented, or helped answer several questions 18-20 mins (10 marks)

Less than 16 mins or more than 22 mins (0 marks)

TOTAL

Does the group have the X-factor?

If the group did something special and went beyond the call of duty in some aspect of their presentation, then put an X in the box. If it was a strong, but otherwise standard, presentation then leave the box blank. An X will give the group 5 marks. X-factor

Please provide some specific feedback for the group:

What were the good aspects of the presentation? What does the group need to work on?

Any other general comments: