Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
60
QMHC Book Review 61
concretely phrased “aims” and “rules” in the course vacy. However, their critical comment that, “Only a
of the report. fraction of clinicians offer e-mail as a communication
In savvy journalistic style, the writers lay out six option to patients,” seems to ignore the weakness of
aims for improvement in the system: that health care current privacy safeguards and the fact that access to
be safe, effective, patient-oriented, timely, efficient, computers is by no means universal.
and equitable. The need for the specific improve- In a chapter that could serve well as one of the
ments is illustrated with a case history. Then they readings for a graduate course in health system fi-
formulate 10 “rules”—the observance of which should nance or organizational analysis, the committee ana-
help to resolve the perceived problems. To get the lyzes payment policies, past and present, and their
resolution process started, they propose that the impact on the quality of care. Mechanisms to improve
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality identify the way payment methods reward quality care are
and focus on a list of common chronic health condi- presented and evaluated. In the final chapter, the
tions (the “priority conditions”) for which state-of- committee addresses the subject of preparing the
the-art care and treatment processes will be devel- health care workforce for the future. The authors
oped and disseminated. make the point that health care workforce planning
The committee recognizes that implementing sys- must become comprehensive in scope, rather than
tem redesign requires developing effective organiza- focused on such subjects as discipline-specific ratios
tional structures and processes. The reengineering or existing organizational models. Their agenda on
principles of system design used in other industries workforce planning would address key issues in
and how they could be applied to health care are well- training and education, legal and regulatory pro-
presented. The role of the leader in planning and cesses, and workforce supply.
implementing change is thoughtfully addressed. The report of the Technical Panel on the State of
Especially well done is the chapter on “Applying Quality to the Quality of Health Care in America
Evidence to Health Care Delivery.” The authors go into Committee is included as Appendix A. Appendix B
detail on such aspects of evidence-based practice as is a chapter by Paul Plsek entitled, “Redesigning
synthesizing clinical findings, using computer-based Health Care with Insights from the Science of Com-
clinical decision support systems, making information plex Adaptive Systems,” a fascinating discussion of
available on the Internet, and defining quality mea- how applying the basic principles of complexity
sures. In another chapter, the related subject of the role thinking might aid in the redesigning effort. Each
of information technology in the twenty-first century chapter of the book has an ample bibliography. This
delivery system is discussed. The authors argue for valuable and well-written report can be recommended
the development of a comprehensive national health to anyone, whether clinician or nonclinician, who is
information infrastructure, while acknowledging the involved in the development of health care delivery
related need for a reliable apparatus to protect pri- system strategy.