IESCO

132kV GIS NBBIA

SIEYUAN

Design of 20/26 MVA Transformer Foundation

Load Data Wind Data by UBC-97
Wind Speed Importance Factor Combined height, exposure & gust Factor coefficient Wind stagnation pressure qs= .0475 v^2 Pressure Coefficient for the structure Wind Pressure Pressure Height of Transformer Moment due to Wind Iw Ce qs Cq P P H 160 Km/h 1.15 Table 16-K 1.2 Table 16-G 1216 N/m2 1.2 Table 16-H Ce*Cq*qs*Iw 1.2*1.2*1216/1000*1.15 2.010 kN/m2 4.750 m 2.01*4.75*4.75/2 22.675 kN.m

Earthquake Data by UBC-97

Design Base Shear is given by Seismic Zone Co-efficient Structure Importance Factor Response Modification Coefficient Seismic Coefficient Structure Amplification Factor Element elevation with respect to Grade Structure roof elevation with respect to grade Total Seismic dead load =Transformer Weight Design Base Shear Max. value V = 4 Ca Ip Wp Design Base Shear Min Value Design Shear Design Shear taken Acting at a hight Moment at base V = 0.7 Ca Ip Wp Z Ip Rp Ca ap hx hr Wp Vmax Vmin 0.400 1.000 3.000 0.400 1.000 1.850 1.850 588.6 0.4*1*588.6*4 Table 16-I -Zone 4 Table 16-K Table 16-O Table 16-Q Table 16-O

ap * Ip * Ca / Rp (1+ 3 * hx / hr)

3/8*(H+D+D1)

941.760 kN 0.4*1*588.6*0.7 164.81 kN V 1*0.4*1/3*(1+3*1.85/1.85)*588.6 313.920 kN 313.920 kN 4.75*3/8 1.781 m From Top 313.92*1.78125 559.17 kN.m So Earthquake is critical H L B h d L1 w c1 4.75 6.20 5.750 5.185 0.455 380 5.75 0.60 1.735 0.91 0.91*9.81*3.281^2 96.0 1.5 18 1 0.685 0.1 m m m m m mm m m m t/ft2 kN/m2 m kN/cum m m m

Geometry data
Height of Transformer Length of Transformer Transformer Foundation Length Transformer Foundation Width Assume thickness of Foundation Pad Supporting Wall Length Supporting Wall Width C/C Wheel Distance

Soil data
Allowable B.Capacity of soil

Depth of foundation Unit wt of backfill Foundation above NSL Foundation above Y.L Lean Concrete

D D1

IESCO

132kV GIS NBBIA

SIEYUAN

Design of 20/26 MVA Transformer Foundation

Concrete data
fc' fy Concrete cover Unit wt of concrete 21 276 75 23.50 Mpa Mpa mm kN/m2

Volumes
Volume of Supporting Wall 5.75*0.6*(1.5-0.455+1-0.1)*2 13.421 m^3 5.75*0.6*(0.685)*2 4.727 1.15*0.3*0.3*4 0.311 5.75*5.185*(1.5-0.455-0.1+1) 57.988 m^3 57.98774375-13.4205 44.257 m^3 0.455*5.75*5.185 13.570 m^3 0.1*5.75*5.185 2.98 23.5*(13.4205+4.7265) 426.45 kN 0.3105*23.5 7.30 kN 23.5*(13.57+2.98) 388.93 kN 44.25674375*18 796.62 kN 588.60 kN 588.6+796.62+388.93+7.3+426.45 2207.90 kN

Volume of Tie Beam Dry volume Backfill Net Volume of Backfill Volume of raft Volume of Lean

Weights
Wt of Supporting Wall Wt. of Tie Beam Wt of raft Backfill Wt. Transformer Weight Total Compression on raft 60ton

Eccentricity
Eccentricity e B/6 559.17/2207.9 0.253 m 5.185/6 0.864 m e<B/6 5.185/2-0.253 2.340 m 5.185^2/6*5.75 25.76 m^3/m 2207.9/5.75/5.185+559.17/25.76 95.77 <96 kN/m2

Bearing Pressure
a Section modulus Max pressure induced at base Sx

Overturning
Destabilizing moment Total Wt. without Backfilling Stabilizing moment Fos against overturning Fos reqd against overturning MD/Mr MD Vr Mr F.OS 95.770 kN.m/m 426.45+7.3+388.93 822.68 kN 822.68*5.185/2 2365.210 kN.m/m 2365.21/95.77 24.697 1.50 Ok

IESCO

132kV GIS NBBIA

SIEYUAN

Design of 20/26 MVA Transformer Foundation

Sliding
Total sliding shear Resistance against sliding Fos against sliding Fos reqd against sliding VD/Vr VD Vr F.OS 313.92 kN 426.45+7.3+388.93 822.680 kN 822.68/313.92 2.621 1.50 Ok 101.39 x (( 5.185/ 2 - 0.6/ 2) - (380 )) 193.908 kN 0.75 x 1/6 ( 21) x 1000 x (380 / 1000) 217.672 kN Thickness is Ok Vu<Vc

One way Shear

Applied Shear Shear Capacity qu* ((B-t1)/2)-d) 1/6 fc b d Vu Vc

Structural Design
Max pressure at base due to dead load Max pressure at base due to Earthquake Factored Pressure Moment arm Factored Total moment R=Mu/(b*d^2) Steel ratio Min steel ratio Steel ratio used Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Use Provide Longitudinal/temperature/shrinkage Steel Provide Minimum steel ratio Area of steel reqd min b H Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd qu*l2/2 P/B M/Sx q1+1.6*q2 q1 q2 qu l 2207.9/5.75/5.185 74.060 kN/m2 559.17/25.76 21.710 kN/m2 0.9*74.06+1.6*21.71 101.390 kN/m2 5.75/2-1.735/2-0.6/2 1.708 m 101.39*1.7075^2/2 147.80 kN-m/m 1.02 0.0043 0.0020 0.0043 1956.500 mm2/m 20 mm 284.000 mm2 145.16 mm/m 145 mm c/c #20@145mm c/c

0.002 0.002*1000*0.455*1000 910 mm2/m 13 mm 129 mm2 142 mm/m #13@142mm c/c 0.0030 1800.000 20 284.000 157.00 #20@157mm c/c 0.0020 1200.000 13 129.000 215.00 #13@215mm c/c

Wall reinforcement
Minimum Vertical Steel ratio used for wall Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Provide Minimum Horizontal Steel ratio used for wall Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Provide mm2 mm mm2 m on each face

mm2 mm mm2 m on each face

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Lahore

NESPAK

Design of 105/150 MVA Transformer Foundation

Load Data Wind Data by UBC-97
Wind Speed Importance Factor Combined height, exposure & gust Factor coefficient Wind stagnation pressure qs= .0475 v^2 Pressure Coefficient for the structure Wind Pressure Pressure Height of Transformer Moment due to Wind Iw Ce qs Cq P P H 160 1.15 0.76 1216 Km/h Table 16-K Table 16-G N/m2

1.2 Table 16-H Ce*Cq*qs*Iw 0.76*1.2*1216/1000*1.15 1.280 kN/m2 8.000 m 1.28*8*8/2 40.960 kN.m

Earthquake Data by UBC-97

Design Base Shear is given by Seismic Zone Co-efficient Structure Importance Factor Response Modification Coefficient Seismic Coefficient Structure Amplification Factor Element elevation with respect to Grade Structure roof elevation with respect to grade Total Seismic dead load =Transformer Weight Design Base Shear Max. value V = 4 Ca Ip Wp Design Base Shear Min Value Design Shear Design Shear taken Acting at a height Moment at base V = 0.7 Ca Ip Wp Z Ip Rp Ca ap hx hr Wp Vmax Vmin 0.150 Table 16-I -Zone 2A 1.000 Table 16-K 3.000 Table 16-O 0.220 Table 16-Q 1.000 Table 16-O 0.600 0.600 1471.5 0.22*1*1471.5*4

ap * Ip * Ca / Rp (1+ 3 * hx / hr)

3/8*H

1294.920 kN 0.22*1*1471.5*0.7 226.61 kN V 1*0.22*1/3*(1+3*0.6/0.6)*1471.5 431.640 kN 431.640 kN 8*3/8 1.500 m From Top 431.64*1.5 647.46 kN.m So Earthquake is critical H L B h d L1 w c1 8.00 6.20 6.75 6.75 0.45 375 5.33 0.60 1.76 0.71 0.71*9.81*3.281^2 75.0 1 18 0.6 0.2 0.1 m m m m m mm m m m t/ft2 kN/m2 m kN/cum m m m

Geometry data
Height of Transformer Length of Transformer Transformer Foundation Length Transformer Foundation Width Assume thickness of Foundation Pad Supporting Wall Length Supporting Wall Width C/C Wheel Distance

Soil data
Allowable B.Capacity of soil

Depth of foundation Unit wt. of backfill Foundation above NSL Foundation above Y.L Lean Concrete

ABB

4 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Lahore

NESPAK

Design of 105/150 MVA Transformer Foundation

Concrete data
fc' fy Concrete cover Unit wt. of concrete 21 420 75 23.50 Mpa Mpa mm kN/m2

Volumes
Volume of Supporting Wall Volume of Tie Beam Dry volume Backfill Net Volume of Backfill Volume of raft 5.33*0.6*(1-0.45+0.6-0.1)*2 6.716 m^3 1.15*0.3*0.3*3 0.311 6.75*6.75*(1-0.45-0.1-0.2+0.6) 38.728 m^3 38.728125-6.7158 31.702 m^3 0.45*6.75*6.75 20.503 m^3 6.7158*23.5 157.82 kN 0.3105*23.5 7.30 kN 20.503125*23.5 481.82 kN 31.701825*18 570.63 kN 1471.50 kN 1471.5+570.63+481.82+7.3+157.82 2689.07 kN

Weights
Wt. of Supporting Wall Wt. of Tie Beam Wt. of raft Backfill Wt. Transformer Weight Total Compression on raft 150ton

Eccentricity
Eccentricity e B/6 647.46/2689.07 0.241 m 6.75/6 1.125 m e<B/6 6.75/2-0.241 3.134 m 6.75^2/6*6.75 51.26 m^3/m 2689.07/6.75/6.75+647.46/51.26 71.66 <75 kN/m2

Bearing Pressure
a Section modulus Max pressure induced at base Sx

Overturning
Destabilizing moment Total Wt. without Backfilling Stabilizing moment Fos against overturning Fos reqd against overturning MD/Mr MD Vr Mr F.OS 71.660 kN.m/m 157.82+7.3+481.82 646.94 kN 646.94*6.75/2 2183.420 kN.m/m 2183.42/71.66 30.469 1.50 Ok

ABB

5 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Lahore

NESPAK

Design of 105/150 MVA Transformer Foundation

Sliding
Total sliding shear Resistance against sliding Fos against sliding Fos reqd against sliding VD/Vr VD Vr F.OS 431.64 kN 157.82+7.3+481.82 646.940 kN 646.94/431.64 1.499 1.50 Not Ok 73.33 x (( 6.75/ 2 - 0.6/ 2) - (375 )) 197.991 kN 0.75 x 1/6 ( 21) x 1000 x (375 / 1000) 214.808 kN Thickness is Ok Vu<Vc

One way Shear

Applied Shear Shear Capacity qu* ((B-t1)/2)-d) 1/6 fc b d Vu Vc

Structural Design
Max pressure at base due to dead load Max pressure at base due to Earthquake Factored Pressure Moment arm Factored Total moment a assumed Area of steel reqd a Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Longitudinal/temperature/shrinkage Steel Provide Minimum steel ratio Area of steel reqd min b H Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd qu*l /2
2

P/B M/Sx 0.9* q1+1.6*q2

q1 q2 qu l

As = M*1000000/(0.9*fy*(d-a/2)) a = As*fy/(.85*fc'*b)

2689.07/6.75/6.75 59.020 kN/m2 647.46/51.26 12.630 kN/m2 0.9*59.02+1.6*12.63 73.330 kN/m2 6.75/2-1.76/2-0.6/2 2.195 m 73.33*2.195^2/2 176.65 kN-m/m 32.60 176.65*1000000/0.9/420/(375-32.6/2) 1365 mm2/m 1365*420/0.85/1000/21 32.12 mm 1,365 mm2/m 16 mm 200 mm2 147 mm/m

0.0018 0.0018*1000*0.45*1000 810 mm2/m 13 mm 129 mm2 160 mm/m #13@160mm c/c 0.0030 1800.000 mm2 13 mm 129.000 mm2 on each face Twice alternate as shown 286.00 in drawings #13@286mm c/c 0.0020 1200.000 mm2 13 mm 129.000 mm2 215.00 mm on each Face #13@215mm c/c

Wall reinforcement
Minimum Vertical Steel ratio used for wall Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar

Bar spacing reqd Provide Minimum Horizontal Steel ratio used for wall Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Provide

ABB

6 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Grid Lahore

NESPAK

Design of Fire Protection Wall & Fire Wall Foundation

Load Data Wind Data by UBC-97
Wind Speed 160 Km/h Iw Importance Factor 1.15 Table 16-K Combined height, exposure & gust Factor coefficient Ce 0.76 Table 16-G Exposure B. Urban and suburban areas, wooded areas or other terrain with numerous closely spaced obstructions having the size of single-family dwellings or larger. Exposure B shall be assumed unless the site meets the definition of another type of exposure. qs Wind stagnation pressure qs= .0475 v^2 1216 N/m2 Pressure Coefficient for the structure Cq 1.2 Table 16-H Wind Pressure P Ce*Cq*qs*Iw Pressure P 1.28 kN/m2 Moment due to Wind Height of wall Moment dt Transverse wind Moment at base

H =

10.35 m 1.28*10.35x10.35/2 kN.m/m 68.6 kN.m/m

Earthquake Data by UBC-97

Design Base Shear is given by Seismic Zone Co-efficient Structure Importance Factor Response Modification Coefficient Seismic Coefficient Fundamental period of vibration T= Ct (hn)3/4 V = Cv I W / R T 0.150 Table 16-I -Zone 2A 1.000 Table 16-K 8.500 Table 16-N or 16-P 0.160 Table 16-R 0.03*9.45^(3/4) 0.162 Ct 0.030 For Concrete Structure Total Seismic dead load =Fire Wall Weight W 79.048 kN Design Base Shear V = Cv I W / R T V 0.16*1*79.048125/8.5/0.162 V 9.18 Acting at a hight 3/8 * H 10.35*0.375 3.881 m From Top Moment at base 9.18*3.88125 35.630 kN.m So Wind Load is Critical Z I R Cv T

Shear in Wall Thickness of wall assumed Shear due to Wind

Factore Shear Force Shear Capacity 0.75 / 6 x fc x b x d

t1 d1 =

0.325 285 1.28*10.35 13.25 kN for unit strip 21.2 kN for unit strip 0.75 x 1/6 ( 21) x 1000 x 285/1000 163.3 kN OK 10.35 9.45 0.90 0.325 0.325*1000-40 285 6.20 4.00 0.45 0.45*1000-75 375 m m m m mm m m m mm mm

Geometry data
Height of Fire wall Height of Fire wall at Y.L Hight of Fire wall below Y.L Thickness of Wall H1+H2 H H1 H2 t1 d1 L1 B h d

Length of Wall Fire wall Foundation Width Assume thickness of Foundation Pad

ABB (Pvt.) Ltd.

7 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Grid Lahore

NESPAK

Design of Fire Protection Wall & Fire Wall Foundation

Soil data
Allowable B.Capacity of soil 0.71 0.71*9.81*3.281^2 75.00 1 18 0.1 21 420 75 40 23.50 T/ft2 kN/m2 kN/m2 m kN/m3 m Mpa Mpa mm mm kN/m2

Depth of foundation Unit wt of backfill Thickness of Lean Concrete

Concrete data
fc' fy Concrete cover for foundation Concrete cover for Wall Unit wt of concrete

Volumes
Dry Volume of wall above Y.L Dry Volume of wall below Y.L Total Dry volume of Wall Volume of raft h*B t1*H1 t1*H2 = = = 0.325*9.45 3.071 0.325*0.9 0.293 0.2925+3.07125 3.364 0.45*4 1.800 m^3/m

m^3/m m^3/m m^3/m

Dry volume of Backfill Net Volume of Backfill Weights Dry Wt of wall Wt of raft Dry Wt of backfill Total weight of fdn+backfill Weight of mounting Post Insulator Weight of mounting tublor busbar Total Compression on raft

H1*B

= =

0.9*4 3.600 m^3/m 3.6-0.2925 3.308 m^3/m 3.36375*23.5 79.048 1.8*23.5 42.300 3.3075*18 59.535 59.535+42.3+79.048125 180.883 1.200 3.800 180.883125+1.2+3.8 185.883

kN/m kN/m kN/m kN/m kN kN kN/m kN/m

P P e B/6

Eccentricity
Eccentricity 68.6/185.883125 0.370 m 4/6 0.667 m e<L/6 4/2-0.37 1.630 m 4^2/6 2.667 m^3/m 185.883125/4+68.6/2.667 72.19 kN/m2/m 72.19 <75 kN/m2

Bearing Pressure
a Section modulus Max pressure induced at base B/2-e B^2/6 a Sx

ABB (Pvt.) Ltd.

8 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Grid Lahore

NESPAK

Design of Fire Protection Wall & Fire Wall Foundation

Overturning
Destabilizing moment Stabilizing moment Fos against overturning Fos reqd against overturning P*B/2 M D/Mr MD Mr F.O.S 68.600 kN.m/m 185.883125*4/2 371.77 kN.m/m 371.77/68.6 5.419 1.50 Ok 1.28*10.35 13.248 kN/m 79.048125+42.3 kN/m 121.349 121.349/13.248 9.160 1.50 Ok 75.281 x (( 4/ 2 - 0.325/ 2) - (375/1000 )) 110.098 kN for unit strips 0.75 x 1/6 ( 21) x 1000 x 375 / 1000 214.810 kN for unit strips Thickness is Ok

Sliding
Total sliding shear Resistance against sliding Fos against sliding Fos reqd against sliding V*H (Wt. of Wall & Foundation) Vr/Vs Vs Vr

One way Shear

Applied Shear Shear Capacity qu ((B-t 1)/2)-d) 1/6 fc b d Vu Vc

Structural Design
Max pressure at base due to dead load Max pressure at base due to Wind Load Total Factore Presuure Moment arm Pad reinforcement Transverse/Main steel Factored Total moment Mu due to Self load & wind a assumed Area of steel reqd a Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Provided Longitudnal/temperature/shrinkage Steel Provide Minimum steel ratio Area of steel reqd min b H Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd P/B M/Sx 0.9* q 1+1.6*q2 q1 q2 185.883125/4 46.48 68.6/2.667 25.73 0.9*46.48+1.6*25.73 75.281 4/2-0.325/2 1.838 kN/m2-m kN/m2-m kN/m2-m m

As = M*1000000/(0.9*fy*(d-a/2)) a = As*fy/(.85*fc'*b)

75.281*1.8375^2/2 127.09 kN-m/m 21.75 127.09*1000000/0.9/420/(375-21.75/2) 924 mm2/m 924*420/0.85/21/1000 21.75 mm 924 mm2/m 16 mm 200 mm2 200/924*1000 217 mm/m #16@217mm c/c

0.0018 0.0018*1000*0.45*1000 810 16 200 247 #16@247mm c/c

mm2/m mm mm2 mm/m

ABB (Pvt.) Ltd.

9 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Grid Lahore

NESPAK

Design of Fire Protection Wall & Fire Wall Foundation

Wall Reinforcement Overload factor for Wind Design M Factored Mu a assumed Area of steel reqd a Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Bar Spacing Provided Area Of Steel Provided Wall Horizontal Reinforcement Min steel ratio Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd 1.40 68.600 kN-m 68.6*1.4 96.040 kN-m 21.80 96.04*1000000/0.9/420/(285-21.8/2) 927 mm2/m 927*420/0.85/1000/21 21.82 mm 927 mm2/m 16 mm 200 mm2 200/927*1000 215.00 mm/m 200.00 mm #16@200mm c/c 200*1000/200 1,000 mm2/m 0.0020 0.002*1000*0.325*1000 650 13 129 129/650*1000 199.00 #13@199mm c/c

As = M*1000000/(0.9*fy*(d-a/2)) a = As*fy/(.85*fc'*b)

min b H

mm2/m mm mm2 mm/m

M Mn

68.600 kN-m 1000*420*285/1000/1000 119.70 kN-m M/Mn = 68.6/119.7 0.57 A Fire Rating 3 Hour has been adopted as per Section 705.4, of International Building Code 2000. Using group F-1 a concrete Cover 40mm has been adapted. An overcapacity has been provided under the guidance of determining the Fire Endurance of concrete elements, ACI 216R-81, Using the graph 2.1.2.1 for carbonate concrete and reinforcing bars, with u=40mm the fire rating of 3 Hours, M/Mn shoud be 0.65. So M/Mn is 0.57, which is less than M/Mn required= .65. The design therefore, qualifies for a fire rating at least 3 hrs. As*fy*d

ABB (Pvt.) Ltd.

10 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Lahore

NESPAK

Design of 105/150 MVA Transformer Foundation

Load Data Wind Data by UBC-97
Wind Speed Importance Factor Combined height, exposure & gust Factor coefficient Wind stagnation pressure qs= .0475 v^2 Pressure Coefficient for the structure Wind Pressure Pressure Iw Ce qs Cq P P 160 1.15 0.78 1216 1.2 Ce*Cq*qs*Iw 1.3089024 1.309 V = Cv I W / R T 0.150 1.000 8.500 0.160 0.143 0.030 1471.500 194.099 3.000 582.296 Km/h Table 16-K Table 16-G N/m2 Table 16-H kN/m2 kN/m2

Earthquack Data by UBC-97

Design Base Shear is given by Seismic Zone Co-efficient Structure Importance Factor Response Modification Coefficient Siesmic Coefficient Fundamental period of vibration T= Ct (hn)3/4 Total Seismic dead load =Transformer Weight Design Base Shear Acting at a hight Moment at base Z I R Cv T Ct W V Table 16-I -Zone 2A Table 16-K Table 16-N or 16-P Table 16-R For Concrete Structure kN From Top kN.m

Geometry data
Height of Transformer Length of Transformer Transformer Foundation Width Transformer Foundation Length Assume thickness of Foundation Pad Supporting Wall Length Supporting Wall Width C/C Wheel Distance hn B L t l w c1 8.00 6.20 6.50 6.50 0.45 5.33 0.60 1.76 m m m m m m m m

Soil data
Allowable B.Capacity of soil Depth of foundation Unit wt of backfill Foundation above NSL Lean Concrete d 0.71 75.0 1 18 0.3 0.2 21 420 60 23.50 8.000 41.885 62.011 62.011 t/ft2 kN/m2 m kN/cum m m Mpa Mpa mm kN/m2 m kN.m/m kN.m/m kN.m/m

Concrete data
fc' fy Concrete cover Unit wt of concrete

Moments
Height of Transformer Moment dt Transverse wind Moment dt Transverse wind & soil Pressure at Top of Footing Pad Net Moment at base So Earthquake is critical

ABB

11 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Lahore

NESPAK

Design of 105/150 MVA Transformer Foundation

Volumes
Dry volume of Supporting Wall Dry volume Backfill Net Volume of Backfill Volume of raft 4.157 35.913 31.755 19.013 m^3 m^3 m^3 m^3

Weights
Dry Wt of Supporting Wall Wt of raft Backfill Wt. Transformer Weight Total Compression on raft 97.699 446.794 571.592 1471.500 2587.584 kN kN kN kN kN

Eccentricity
Eccentricity e L/6 0.024 m 1.033 m e<L/6 3.226 45.771 73.967 74.000 m m^3/m kN/m2/m <75 kN/m2

Bearing Pressure
a Section modulus Max pressure induced at base

Overturning
Destabilizing moment Stabilizing moment Fos against overturning Fos reqd against overturning 73.967 kN.m/m 8409.649 kN.m/m 113.695 1.50 Ok 194.099 kN 544.493 kN 2.805 1.50

Sliding
Total sliding shear Resistance against sliding Fos against sliding Fos reqd against sliding

One way Shear

Applied Shear Shear Capacity 1416.025 kN 1452.104 kN Thickness is Ok

Structural Design
Overload factor Max pressure at base Moment arm Design M due to pressure Factored Total moment due to Self load & wind Steel ratio Min steel ratio Steel ratio used Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Use Provide 1.60 74.000 2.070 158.541 253.67 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 900.000 16 200.000 222.22 222 #16@222mm c/c kN/m2 kN-m/m kN-m/m

mm2/m mm mm2 mm/m mm c/c

ABB

12 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Lahore

NESPAK

Design of 105/150 MVA Transformer Foundation

Longitudnal/temperature/shrinkage Steel Min steel ratio Steel ratio used Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Provide 0.0020 0.0020 900.000 16 200.000 222.00 #16@222mm c/c

mm2/m mm mm2 mm/m

Wall reinforcement
Minimum Vertical Steel ratio used for wall Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Provide Minimum Horizontal Steel ratio used for wall Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Provide 0.0030 1800.000 13 129.000 286.00 #13@286mm c/c 0.0020 1200.000 16 200.000 166.00 #16@166mm c/c mm2 mm mm2 on each face

mm2 mm mm2

ABB

13 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Grid Lahore

NESPAK

Design of Fire Protection Wall & Fire Wall Foundation

Load Data Wind Data by UBC-97
Wind Speed Importance Factor Combined height, exposure & gust Factor coefficient Wind stagnation pressure qs= .0475 v^2 Pressure Coefficient for the structure Wind Pressure Pressure Iw Ce qs Cq P P 160 1.15 0.78 1216 1.2 Ce*Cq*qs*Iw 1.3089024 1.309 V = Cv I W / R T 0.150 1.000 8.500 0.160 0.162 0.030 155.878 18.075 3.563 64.391 Km/h Table 16-K Table 16-G N/m2 Table 16-H kN/m2 kN/m2

Earthquake Data by UBC-97

Design Base Shear is given by Seismic Zone Co-efficient Structure Importance Factor Response Modification Coefficient Seismic Coefficient Fundamental period of vibration T= Ct (hn)3/4 Total Seismic dead load =Fire Wall Weight Design Base Shear Acting at a hight Moment at base Z I R Cv T Ct W V Table 16-I -Zone 2A Table 16-K Table 16-N or 16-P Table 16-R For Concrete Structure kN From Top kN.m

Geometry data
Height of Fire wall Height of Fire wall at Y.L Hight of Fire wall below Y.L Thickness of Wall Length of Wall Fire wall Foundation Width Assume thickness of Foundation Pad hn h1 h2 t1 L1 B t2 10.20 9.50 0.70 0.30 6.20 3.70 0.45 m m m m m m m

Soil data
Allowable B.Capacity of soil Depth of foundation Unit wt of backfill 0.71 75.00 1 18 T/ft2 kN/m2 m 3 kN/m

Concrete data
fc' fy Concrete cover Unit wt of concrete 21 300 60 23.50 Mpa Mpa mm kN/m2

Moments
Height of wall above Y.L Moment dt Transverse wind & soil Pressure at Y.L Moment dt Transverse wind & soil Pressure at Top of Footing Pad Net Moment at base So Wind load is critical 9.500 59.064 72.499 72.500 m kN.m/m kN.m/m kN.m/m

ABB (Pvt.) Ltd.

14 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Grid Lahore

NESPAK

Design of Fire Protection Wall & Fire Wall Foundation

Volumes
Dry Volume of wall above Y.L Dry Volume of wall below Y.L Total Dry volume of Wall Volume of raft Dry volume of Backfill Net Volume of Backfill Weights Dry Wt of wall Wt of raft Dry Wt of backfill Total weight of fdn+backfill Weight of mounting Surge Arrestor Total Compression on raft 2.850 0.210 3.060 1.665 2.590 2.380 71.910 39.128 42.840 153.878 2.000 155.878 m^3/m m^3/m m^3/m m^3/m m^3/m m^3/m kN/m kN/m kN/m kN/m kN kN/m

Eccentricity
Eccentricity e L/6 0.465 m 0.617 m e<L/6 1.385 2.282 73.904 74.000 m m^3/m kN/m2/m <75 kN/m2

Bearing Pressure
a Section modulus Max pressure induced at base

Overturning
Destabilizing moment Stabilizing moment Fos against overturning Fos reqd against overturning 72.500 kN.m/m 288.373 kN.m/m 3.978 1.50 Ok 12.435 kN/m 111.038 kN/m 8.930 1.50 Ok 806.045 kN 826.582 kN Thickness is Ok

Sliding
Total sliding shear Resistance against sliding Fos against sliding Fos reqd against sliding

One way Shear

Applied Shear Shear Capacity

Structural Design
Overload factor Max pressure at base Moment arm Pad reinforcement Design M due to pressure Factored Total moment Mu due to Self load & wind Steel ratio Min steel ratio Steel ratio used Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Provide 1.60 74.000 kN/m2 1.700 106.930 171.09 0.0018 0.0020 0.0020 900.000 16 200.000 222.00 #16@222mm c/c kN-m/m kN-m/m

mm2/m mm mm2 mm/m

ABB (Pvt.) Ltd.

15 of 16

NETRACON Technology

NTDC

SVC at NKLP Grid Lahore

NESPAK

Design of Fire Protection Wall & Fire Wall Foundation

Wall Reinforcement above YL Moment arm Design M at Y.L Factored Mu Steel ratio Min steel ratio Steel ratio used Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Wall Reinforcement below YL Moment arm Design M at Footing Pad Factored Mu Steel ratio Min steel ratio Steel ratio used Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd Wall Horizontal Reinforcement Min steel ratio Area of steel reqd Bar size Area of bar Bar spacing reqd 4.75 59.064 94.503 0.00229 0.0015 0.0023 642.55 13 129 200.00 #13@200mm c/c 5 77.09 123.34256 0.0030 0.0015 843.84 16 200 237.00 #16@237mm c/c 0.0020 600 13 129 215.00 #13@215mm c/c m kN-m kN-m Each Face mm2/m mm mm2 mm/m

m kN-m kN-m Each Face mm2/m mm mm2 mm/m

mm2/m mm mm2 mm/m

ABB (Pvt.) Ltd.

16 of 16

NETRACON Technology